WEBVTT - Surgical Solutions CEO on Covid-19 Vaccine

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the worlds of

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be sort of watch

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News. Well,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Alex and I were just chatting about a store on

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg about the pressures on healthcare workers here as

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we go into a second and third wave here, and

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it must just be just the ongoing cumulative pressures and

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the on these healthcare workers is just extraordinary. Our next

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>guests can help us talk about that a little bit.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>In the overall home healthcare services space. ALYSSA. Wrap is

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a chief executive officer of Surgical Solutions. He joins us

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Deerfield, Illinois. Lissa, thanks so much

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I know you've got your company has

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>over to employees on the frontlaw lines of this crisis. Here,

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what you're hearing from them.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is month ten, and it looks like

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a couple three more difficult months ahead

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of us. How are they doing well? Thanks for asking

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for having me back, Paul and Alex. You know,

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been a crazy and wild year for frontline healthcare workers.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I was looking this morning at our volume of the

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the number of surgeries they've supported from November

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of eight thousand and months that's then dipped and plummeted

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand in April, and starting in July and

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>August it was back and now we're up above a

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen of our annual volume from last year

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>because people are rescheduling those procedures that were canceled or

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to get them in before their year in deductibles

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are refreshed. So what is how would I feel or

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel if we had been on that roller coaster ride, exhausted,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a little burnt out, motivated by the mission of the

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>work and serving the end patient, and anxiously awaiting the vaccine.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's been a heck of a year and it feels

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be medium worse in some ways.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>We have this new strain of COVID that was discovered

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK that hasn't been reported here yet, but

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>by all admissions like, there's no way it can't get

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>here at some point right where it might be here already.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing about that from your online workers? Yeah,

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.279
<v Speaker 1>so what I am hearing is that people are cautiously

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that the current vaccines will vaccinate against the current

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>strain and those uh less virulent but more fast spreading

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>strains or mutations, so they're not as afraid of the mutations.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>What we're all concerned about for our two or fifty

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>people in thirty five hospitals in nine states is when

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are they going to get the vaccine? And there's they're

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in the front line to get it in January, but

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not there yet. Yeah, that's kind of where I

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>want to go. Well, listen, I think you know, and

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 1>we all in the eu furia of the last month

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>or so of these uh fives and modern vaccines. You know,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the number that I seem to have been the acceptable

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>number out there is maybe twenty million vaccinations by the

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>end of count I think we're nowhere near that. What

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is your sense of of how this is rolling out

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in some of the early days here, Great question, Paul.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So what we are seeing is at about of each

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>hospitals eligible staff is getting vaccinated or has been already.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean. You're an e ER worker, you're

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an I c U worker, or you're a surgeon, you

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have probably been vaccinated. If you're in a major metropolis

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or a market that has access to the vaccine. If

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you're the other of the essential workers, you're getting it next,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>but you probably haven't had that first shot yet, by

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and large, So that's great that we're making progress. What

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we need is more progress faster. Um, are you hearing

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>anything about individuals not wanting to take it? In the

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>healthcare profession? It's interesting and our our team is you know,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>frontline support for minimally invasive surgeries, and we have a

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>roster of vaccines and immunizations our team has to get

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>before they go into any hospital, and the hospital policy

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about vaccines is what governs ours for our team. And

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so in these hospitals where it's required of their staff,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there's really not been any pushback of when our team

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is getting it. If anything. It's the contrary, are we

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on the list to get it when when our run

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of essential worker gets vaccinated in the answer is yes,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there will be pushback, But when you are

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>on the front line, UM, and you are knowing how

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>exposed you've been, I haven't seen it yet with our team.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>So Alyssa, let's switch gears a little bit um PPE.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>That was such a big problem in the initial wave

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>back in March in April, and it really underscored kind

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the risk to the supply chain, if you will. Well,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>here we are fast forward ten months later. Where are

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we in terms of P p P within the healthcare

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>system to deal with these rising numbers? I can I

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>can speak to this anecdotally, not nationwide, but anecdotally. We

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>saw a dearth of PP in all major markets when

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this first hit, like everybody did, and then those major

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>metropolo these again New York City, Chicago, l A, San

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Francisco stockpiled and so those markets are now flushed with PPE.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But where we're seeing a shortage now uh eight, nine,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>ten months later is in more rural markets and more

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>small regional hospitals. That's where our folks have said they're

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to see a decline, and we have our own

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>corporate stockpiled just in case our people made it. We

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>want them armed with the right artillery to go to battle,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. But we've heard the pinch the greatest

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>so far in Rule America, not in the major metropolis,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>just totally. Also, what area right now is worse off that?

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think that it depends how you

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>define where's we're soft right. I think that the major

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>metropolis are gonna see higher numbers by by definition, but

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's all about preparedness and also the rate of positivity.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.119
<v Speaker 1>So the first wave in the Q two hit those

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>dense urban markets the highest, where the smaller markets were

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>not as scathed. And here we are. We saw a

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>big pop in those secondary in tertiary markets in October

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>November because that's when it hit. That first wave was

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>was really their first wave. And so now it's I

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to stay calming to a dull roar. The

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers are the numbers. We all see them. But it's

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I think people are more prepared and I'm just hopeful

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccine can come in a more widespread manner

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>before there. As you said earlier, a third, fourth, and

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>fifth wave of this thing. So listen, just in the

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>next twenty seconds, where are your people mostly deployed. Are

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>they smaller, more rural markets maybe where they're understaffed. No, Actually,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we have forty of our team in New York City,

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and then we also have them in big, big markets

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.559
<v Speaker 1>like Houston, and then uh, you know, a large number

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in Kentucky and Louisiana and upstate New York and other places.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>But now we're we sort of see both extremes, the

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>large urban markets in the in the smaller regional ones. Hey, listen,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Again. We always appreciate

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>your perspective here on this unfolding stories that moves from

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, just trying to deal with it on a

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis, to therapeutics and vaccines. So we

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your thoughts and listen. Rap Chief executive Officer Surgical Solutions,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from the Deerfield, Illinois, and again,

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex interesting, We're gonna be seeing how this vaccination rollout

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>plays out over the coming weeks and months, and hopefully

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it can go smoothly so we can do it as

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>efficiently as possible. Well, we did finally get that fiscal

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill passed and sign although it was an ugly

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>process over the last several days. You had weird coalitions.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>On one day you had the president with the Democrats

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and you have the Republicans and not with their president.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But it all got said, all got done there in

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the end, let's get the latest. Let's dig under the hood.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Laura Davison, congressional tax reporter

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. She joined us on the phone from Washington,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>d C. So, Laura, we did get a plan. Talk

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to us about the stimulus payment that seems to be

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the real bone of contention here between all parties involved. Yes,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so similar to the Cares Act backs in March, this

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>still has another stimulus payment, this time six dollars for

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>adults and four children. Uh. Last time it was college

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for adults, five dred for children. But otherwise the eligibility

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is is relatively similar. Um, if you make less than

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy five thousand dollars as an individual, you'll get that

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>full payment. Twice that a hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for a married couple, you'll get that full amount. And

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a phase out, so uh, you know for about

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars. On top of that, there's a you'll get

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a diminishing amount below that six hundred dollars. Uh. But

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this is still very much a live issue. There is

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a vote planned in the House of Representatives tonight that

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would increase that amount to two thousand dollars, both for

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>adults and children. Unclear how it will fare in the House, However,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the prospect for this passing Congress is not likely. The

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Senate is not likely to bring us up, or if

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if they were to it, it would like to not

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pass that chamber is two thousand dollars on the table

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for like three weeks from now, You know, that is

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a good question. Obviously there will be a change of

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>administration uh come next month. The question really hangs the

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>bounce of you know, what happens in Georgia. Uh, is

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that runoff election for both Georgia seats That will determine

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the control of the Senate UM and that will really

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of be a deciding factor in terms of, you know,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what can get done legislatively, what sort of political appointees

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>UM are able to to pass the Senate and enjoining

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. So there's a lot of question mark about

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, not only you know, what can be done politically,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but also what the state of the economy and the

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>virus and the vaccine will be and what the what

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the calls will be for in terms of what parts

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economy need boosting at that point. So, Laura,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you've covered this Congress thing for a while, what do

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you make of the seemingly lack of coordination and cohesion

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>between the White House uh, their Republican colleagues, and then

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party just seem like the President really pulled

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the wrong out from under his own party. He he

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really did. You know, Congresses is known for chaos, but

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>even by Congress of standards, this was quite bizarre. Um.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>It has created some really weird factions where you had Democrats,

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you when when President Trump said, hey, you know, I

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>want two thousand dollars, they were like, great, We've been

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>saying this for months, let's take a vote on it.

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And Republicans were put in a very awkward position of,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, having negotiated actually for a lower stimulus payment

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>rather than a higher one. Yeah, that they're definitely when

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw the headline last week was on vacation. I

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, what happened? Usually go away, nothing happens,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you can back, everything is the same. Um, So what

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>else is in this bill, um that we need to

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know about. I feel like we've glossed over kind of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening for the sectors that need to be bailed

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>out again that are the ones actually rallying today. Yeah.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So there is a new round of p p P

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that Paycheck Protection Program money UH to kind of go

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>out to two small businesses across the board. They specifically

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>targeted some money to two very small businesses minority owned. UH.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of money for for stages for for

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>live performance venues, which had lobby hard saying, hey, look

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been closed for months and really unable to do anything.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>There's some additional airline aid UM. And there's also very

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>importantly another round of unemployment benefits, these sort of enhanced

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>federal benefits to to help people who are who are

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out of work and kind of keep them afloat UH

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for for the coming months. So on the p PP side,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Lard there was some concern and some criticism last time

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that it didn't really get to the small and midsized

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses that really needed it. For example, if he didn't

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>have a relationship with a bank, Uh, it was very,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to get the funds. Is there any modification

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to the plan this time? As far as we can tell,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there's several things that they did, um and and

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the advocates who were pushing for those changes are hopeful

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that that small you know, those very small businesses, we

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>will be able to access the funds. They changed with

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the incentive structures for the banks who were actually making

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>these loans, processing these loans, so that they wouldn't necessarily

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit or you know, be incentivized to take only big

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>loans and not take small loans. There's a certain part

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the money that's earmarked for these very small loans.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Um and they've also just made the process a lot

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>easier for the businesses applying. There is some concern that

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>there were you know, just there is some reputational risk

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and with the program of people of her that

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated that it's hard that the rules change, and

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>some businesses may be scared. Though there's a lot of

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>efforts sort of in the small business community development world

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to get businesses who are who are hurting to

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and apply for this money. Y Lara, thanks

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We really appreciate it clarifying

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what's coming out of Washington here in terms of that

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus. Laura Davison, congressional tax reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from Washington, d C.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of moving parts there, Alex. But

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is a good first step, and then

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to just wait and see what the Biden administration,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what strep strategy that they want to take in terms

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal stimulus. Presumably they're going to want to be

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive, your boy, I guess we'll have to wait

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens, certainly in Washington, d c. Uh

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it the makeup of Congress. You're listening to

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser on Bloomberg Radio. Let's

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>take some time and talk about the global oil business.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>When you think about all the commodities after that have been,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, swinging around during this pandemic. On news as

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the pandemic, metrics as it relates to vaccines,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>crude oil has been one of the most actives, and

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's a bell weather and it's a reflects on

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>investors belief about when this economy will begin to open.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the latest. We can do that with the

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>professor Brenda Schaefer. She's from the She's a research faculty

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>member of the U S. Naval post Graduate School, also

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a fellow with the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center. She

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Washington, d C. Professor

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of Schaeffer, thanks so much for joining us here. You know,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen oil kind of rally up to the high

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>forties here in terms of w t I, but it

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>really seems to be driven by demand or the perceptions

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of demand going forward, as opposed to supply a little bit.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We know it's a commodity and it's a demand supply issue,

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but it just feels like it's being driven by demand.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>How do you view the global oil markets right here?

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Yes, and I think that there is I mean,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're backed up to um the pre COVID, you know,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>oil oil price rate, you know, bent back up to

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the rates of of March um. So it's definitely a

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>confidence in the direction of that with the general economic

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>trends are going UM. But I think that there's two

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>big picture trends that are going to emerge post COVID,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty clear to anyone you know, trading in oil. UM.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>One is that we're not going back to the same

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 1>rates of public transportation. So even after the vaccine, after

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>people return to work, UM, they're not going to return

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to the same rates of use of public transport. Transportation

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that that fuer will probably linger for a long time.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And the second is the use of plastics. So if

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we would almost already factored in two thousand eighteen two

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen sort of a general global decline and demand

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for plastics, UM with you know, different environmental goals, UM,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and and commercial goals, UM, it's clear

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that plastics demand will be high. And plastics, you know,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the main is a sector that uses a lot of

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>oil to produce it. So these are two things that

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>won't change that you know, dependent on you know, regardless

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of what happens going forward with the pandemic, with the economy,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to see return earned to the same

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>levels of public transportation or or a decline in demand

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for plastics. Can other things offset that so diesel, for example,

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>or other petro cam products. UM. Yes, I think the

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>specifics you know for plastics that you know right now

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with current technologies, UM, I don't think we'll see, you know,

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a big, big change in that trend. But there are

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side a couple more short term things

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that could affect the market. UM. One, we have OPEC

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>plus meeting again in January and reevaluating their strategy. It

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like Russia actually wants to up production, which would

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>mean UM, you know, downward pressure on the price UM.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is in order to preempt US shale from

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>recovering and you know and coming back in in a

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>big way to the market. And then a second big

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>question mark is that UM, if the incoming Biden administration

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>will quickly go back to an agreement with Ran will

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>allow more Iranian oil to the market, how quick Iran

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>manages to up its production if that takes place, So

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side, there could be more oils coming

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>into the market UM in early one that would affect

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the price UM, but those bigger issues on the demand

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>side probably won't won't be moved. So, professor, do you

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think we've some people are you know, raise the issue

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>prior to the pandemic that perhaps the world had seen

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>peak oil. What is your view there? Um, as my

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>students know over the years, I don't. I don't believe

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in peak anything when it comes to oil. So so,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean basically having a finite of anything fine,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's finite supply or finite demand. I think it's

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>very uh you know, it's very difficult to conceive of that.

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So it used to be we were talking about peak oil.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We meant about you know, peak supplies, and that was

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>completely debunked. You know, we were we got you know,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we were we were awash and oil from from from

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen to about out. Um. Uh so debunks that,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and then then we had to have a new peak theory,

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>which was peak demand. Um. Yeah, I you know, I

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>see it doesn't it's much ago. We often talk about

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>energy transition, energy transformation as if it's a fact. Sure,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>many things are happening, but I'm still in the transportation sector,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>especially with this new uh lingering fear of public transportation,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we're far away from uh, you know, decoupling

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>our activities from oil. In the transportation sector. I mean

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>totally right now. I mean look at like SUV sales

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>or bananas. I mean, evs are great. Okay, you're gonna

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have more UM subsidies, you're gonna push them out, et cetera.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you'll have some charging stations, but people just really

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>want to buy SUVs. UM just and we'll get to

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the specific of the energy plan UM that was passed

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. But I mean, does gasoline have a

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have a real life here, real future UM you know,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, definitely if you again, if they it's

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not even I agree with your point about it's

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>UM larger cars, but we're even seeing sort of a

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>revival of the used cars and uh, the industry of

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, car parts and and repairs, because the same

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>people that were riding the bus and the metro UM,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>they might not be buying a new you know, a

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>new car. So so it's really a renaissance of those

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>industries UM as well. And uh yes, and and and

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>still not you know, people can't afford uh, there's the

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>same kind of people that are moving from public transportation

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to to private vehicle. UM, you know, probably can't afford

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>electric cars regardless of the subsidy. And then quickly, are

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we going to see a point where we don't have

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>enough oil for the demand that we're going to meet

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>over the next two years or three years. Well, we

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>will have enough oil, but it might come at a price.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's why um there, there's there is a big

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>chance that you know, what has happened over the past

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the past year and even more or less over the

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>past uh six years, when there's spent a lot of

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>many periods of low oil prices that there haven't been

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of um uh, there haven't been a lot

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of investments investments in new oil. So so now the

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>demand is going up, there isn't necessarily new production there

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet the demands. What will happen to you know,

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>prices will go up. A big question mark is how

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>fast US shale production will uh will reappear because it

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>basically it has about the ability relatively to swing back

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>faster than a lot of other places um and that

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>could be a modifying impact on on on the global

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>oil price. But you know, it's not clear how much

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>investor appetite uh there is to go back to the

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>shale because some most more people have lost money on

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that then than Professor I want to continue discussion and

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of go to the fact that we are going

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a new administration in the White House in

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a little more than three weeks. What does that mean

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for the U. S energy policy? Do you believe what

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if you heard from the Biden campaign and maybe what

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we know about his past policymaking. Um, yeah, thank you.

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, you know, I think that the ability of

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the federal government in general to uh influence some at

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>least US energy production is limited relatively to the States,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. So we debated a lot, we talked about

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it a lot, but but at the end of the day,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, most of the regulation of US energy production

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is by you know, by the state structure. So um,

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, clearly there's going to be on the formal level, Um,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, more of an emphasis on climate policy. Um.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, returned to the Paris Agreement. But

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I think on you know, day to day things that

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>affect US oil production and oil and gas production, we

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>might not see any any uh dramatic changes. And it

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is quite interesting that under the Trump administration, even though

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't you know, a formal policy of you know,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>promoting climate aversion of promoting renewable energy. Renewable energy production

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow UH significantly, you know, enter to the

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, UM US emissions relative to the economic growth

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to decline. UM. So you know, so really the

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most important signals actually if if there

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>are policies that are both economic, it doesn't really matter

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>UM or doesn't matter significantly what the political framework is.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>If I think the best example is, UM how the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>switching in the United States of the electricity production from

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>natural gas to coal. So this is, you know, without

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>any policy, simply because natural gas has been cheaper in

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>most markets, UM power product producers have decided to go

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>from you know, gas to from coal to gas. And

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this lower US emissions, is lowest US air pollution regardless

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of government policies. Well and then and to that point,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even in the budget that UM is said

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to be passed today, there's like twenty three billion that

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was four solar and wind, even though it's a Trump administration.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Also for carbon capture, et cetera. And I think that's

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>something that's nuanced here is that if you get a

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of money going into this technology like carbon capture

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>or direct air capture or you're basically just sucking carbon

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the for air um and then having to

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>recycle it. That's actually an oil story. Like oil companies

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that are actually spending to do that

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because in part they have the infrastructure. Yeah, I think

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great point. And how much you know,

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>many things you know, because of Congress's support, you know,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>are not contingent on you know, who happens to occupy

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the White House. UM. But also I think you know

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes we lump all together, um, all fossile fuels

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>as if you know, oil, natural gas and coal are

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. And I think that we're already seeing

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe a backtracking in Europe on this because

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>why has the US been so successful and lowing air pollution,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>lowering carbon emissions that is just this easy and you know,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>cheap transference from use of coal to natural gas UM.

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And Europe didn't adopt the same policies. They tried to

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of skip the fossil fuels, you'll skip natural gas

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and go uh, you know directly into renewable but that's

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the way to lower emissions, and they have not been

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>despite all their you know, being part of the Paris agreement,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>all the global agreements, having all the rhetoric, they have

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>not been a successful as the United States and lowering

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>pollution and lowering carbon emission. So, um, I think we

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>might be seen a rethinking of UH natural gas. That

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that really even though the fossil fuel it does has

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>such a lower climate impact and pollution impact than the

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>alternative fossil fuels. So professor, presumably under Rebided administration, the

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship economic relationship between the US and China will improve,

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and perhaps you know, we'll see trade levels pick up.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>How does that, How does energy fit in to the U. S.

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>China relationship? Yeah, well, I think it's still early to call, um,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, how the U. S. China relationship is going

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to change. I think that um, due to the pandemic

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, and seeing the vulnerability of US

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>supply lines on uncritical UM and critical products you know,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>being abroad. I think there's something that there is bipartisan

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>consensus that, um, you know, the sort of US dependence

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>on China needs to change. So it's it's not really

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>clear I think exactly how um, you know, how how

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>if trade relations will go back to the sort of

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Obama era type of frameworks or for really in a

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a new a new stage. UM. But we

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly sure energy you know, the US, UM, natural gas

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>exports are often you know, touted as something that helps

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>US allies, um, you know, improve their energy security. But

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, some of the biggest consumers of US

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>energy exports are you know, actually China and UH UM

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily countries that are you know, have energy

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>UH dependence or security supply issues. So clearly, for for

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the case of natural gas, UM, the trade policies that

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>really matter. UM, do you expect this to be quick

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US in a way that they can catch

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>up to Europe at all? I'm in terms of that

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>climate policy, in terms of real money going to real places. UM. Well,

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I look more on the global aspects of UH of energy.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, we should be really results

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>driven driven versus process. So again, if you take something

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like uh the Paris Accords, clearly the Biden administration will

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.239
<v Speaker 1>go clearly back to the to the accords, but that

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>won't necessarily change um, you know much in the United

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>States because again the US has been doing a lot

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the market itself to to reduce emissions and reduced pollution

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Professor Brenda Shaffer, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Research faculty member at the US Naval post Graduate also

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a fellow with the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center, joining

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Washington, d C. Giving us

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the latest geopolitical impact for global energy morow a journal. Yeah,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. Oh no, and en Honey, please,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll do thet I want to drive ball, Just drive

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>baby the question. This is the drive to the globe community.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks well, dry up Don on Bloomberg Radio. Well, when

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you have markets at or near all time highs, as

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we do right now, you think about where we were

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>back in March. It's just an extraordinary turnaround. But when

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you do get markets there, what you also get is

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies tapping the initial public market offering market,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>either by a direct I p O, where now we've

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>got spacks and direct listings, taking a sense of kind

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of how two thousand and twenty played out and maybe

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>how one is going to look at this point. Christian Munafo,

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>chief investment Officer of Liberty Street Advisers, also portfolio portfolio

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>manager of share Post one Fund. He joins us on

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. Christian, thanks so much

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Give us just a look back

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on it seemed like we had some really really big deals. Yes,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>good afternoon, it's nice to be with you. Yeah, it

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was certainly an active year, uh, in any stretch of

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the imagination, you know, I P O s, you know,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the traditional IPO structure at least, you know, we've raised

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the neighborhood of about eighty billion dollars, which

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is almost two f up from last year. Um spacts

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>where over eighty billion, coming off of thirteen billion last year.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Direct listings, you know, as we know, have beencoming more popular.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's certainly been an interesting time for you know,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>private late stage innovation companies, you know. And it's worth

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>just understanding that, you know, the the structure that these

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>companies are coming from is essentially structurally a liquid, right,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the private markets are in a structurally a liquid asset class,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and over the last couple of decades, what we've seen

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is that these private companies continue staying private for longer,

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and so as a result of that, you have these

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>companies that are growing into you know, much larger operating

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>businesses and at the time that they go public, um

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>or are attracting you know, also potential acquisition oriented um

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>A sponsor capital. They're just much larger businesses than what

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the past when we think of companies

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft and Oracle and those types of companies when

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they went public. These companies are staying private for much longer.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>They're scaling into much larger businesses, and we're seeing a

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand for this high growth innovation. So I'm

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>going to try and tie this conversation into something that

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the markets overnight, and that was the

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big sell off we've seen over the last two days

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>over in Asia, JD, dot Com, Ali, Baba, etcetera. All

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of that really because China's cracking down on Ant, which

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to go public would have been the biggest

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I p O ever and then now they're cracking down

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're seeing something somewhat similar in the US.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Obviously these are very different circumstances, but the idea that

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies are too big, they're doing too many things. Um,

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you noticing in the private market with mid

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sized companies? Are they getting that warning? Are they wanting

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to stay smaller? Yeah? No. I think it's a very

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good question. You know, I think we've been fortunate that

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen this play out at scale as of yet.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we saw it clearly, you know, Tobacco

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>last year with we worked, and there's obviously some other

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ones out there. You look with Spaces we worked. Here's

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like a million years ago, by the way, doesn't it

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it does? Yeh, yeah, yeah, it sure does, except for

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>those who invested into it. That's true. God, yeah, But

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think look, I think the reality is, uh. From

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream standpoint, a lot of the venture capitalists and

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>protequity investors who backed these companies are very much focused

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on nacho, you know, executing on the operational plans of

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the core company, but also making sure that they're not

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>overexposing themselves because they've seen what happens. You know, there's

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>been so much capital that's flown into these markets over

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the last decade alone. You know, somewhere in the order

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of six trillion has come into the private markets, of

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>which over a trillion has been allocated just for venture

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And so when you can raise that kind of money,

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not difficult to get excited about trying to grow

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>into different areas. But I think what a lot of

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to is governance and discipline at the

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>board level to make sure that the company is staying

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>focused on its core competencies and not stretching itself. So, Christian,

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your outlook for one? I guess just the broad

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>market outlook is okay, vaccines are coming. The worst, you know,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, once we get past the next couple of

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>months will be behind us and we can look forward

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to maybe in the second half of the year, maybe

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>even beginning a second quarter of the economy beginning to

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>grow again. What do you think about the capital raising

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and the I p O and the going public market?

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And then sure, so, look, I think in any market cycle,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from our experience and from our perspective, we believe that

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be strong public market interest and

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>demand for innovative, differentiated companies that are generating substantial growth

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and market penetration and that also can turn a profit, right,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because we saw that with some of the companies were

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioning even though they have these hyper growth type trajectories,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they're unable to demonstrate profitability or at least they passed

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to that. So it's our view at in any market cycle,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to continue to be strong demand for these

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>types of companies you know that can uh show the

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ability to generate that that profit. And again there's just

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>been a substantial supply build up of many of these

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>late stage companies. And so you know, when we look

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at two thousand and twenty one, you know, we look

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at our own portfolio, we see activity that's happening. You know,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>we believe that two one should continue to be a

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>very active year for the late stage private company space.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What we saw this year clearly was an acceleration of

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>technology adoption across the board. These not are not only

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>technologies that are going to be disruptive, but they're also

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be complementary. And so, you know, we think

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of capital out there that's chasing growth,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's chasing innovation. We think that it's going to continue

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. M Is it all going to

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be in tech startups? Well, it depends on what your

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.719
<v Speaker 1>definition of startup is, right, and so you know, when

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you have when you have companies in a generating you know,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions to billions in revenue, you know, those

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are not startups from the from the traditional sense, and

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what many of these companies are. UM. But look,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not all these companies are going to be success success stories,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and not all of these companies are also going to

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>achieve a public market currency. You know. We have to

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that there's hundreds of billions in cash sitting on

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheets of the mega tech companies alone that

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking for ways to augment their own reach capabilities,

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so a lot of these companies will

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also get acquired. UM. But yes, to your point there,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there are certainly not going to be all success stories. Hey, Christian,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining it. We appreciate it so much.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting talking tech investing and just growth investing in general.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian manofo He is the chief investment officer for Liberty

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Street Advisers, also portfolio manager of shares Post Fund At

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New York City. Thanks

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or at Bloomberg dot com, and

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out our daily radio show at

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. And be sure to

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News,