WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Second-Guessing?

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Helman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, September fourteenth, twenty twenty, season sixteen, episode

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>number twenty two. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>We are alive in this WBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick and I are joined by Dave helm and Amber Garcia.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They are at their homes and we're gonna talk some

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys football with you guys for an hour. We're coming

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>off the first game of the season and Cowboys lose

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Los Angeles Rams twenty to seventeen. Nick's gonna

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>give us an idea at some point during the show

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of what the scene was like there. He was at

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that new beautiful stadium so far right now, you want

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to do that quick? All right? Yep, that's very much

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what it sounded like like that, you know. Actually, the

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>funny thing is I said on the show last week

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was last week. I said that I'd

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>been watching some college games and I that I didn't

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really notice the crowd not being there. Yesterday, it was

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>very apparent to me that there was no crowd there.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, but for some reason, even the

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>energy just feeled like it felt like it was very

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>very different. Dave Ember, did you guys notice the same thing? Yeah,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all I hear is day's papers. Oh I'm sorry, Sorry,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking through my stats. Am I bad? You have

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to look for stats to talk about the environment. That

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was good? Okay, what you got. I'm just getting my

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>talking points ready, Derek. Okay, all right, tell you what show?

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I know this. Okay, let's go jump right in. Hey,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say this though about that, like, like, yeah,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw some games earlier in the day and the

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game and all that, But I mean this,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have like a little bit of add which

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I maybe I have sometimes when you're not always paying

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>attention and all of a sudden, but I was telling

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave this, when the crowd will tell you look up,

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't happen. You know, you just hear whistles

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and you hear the other side I mean, that's one

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>thing they were saying they could hear the calls from

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the other sideline, so they got to crank up that

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that noise a little bit. It was kind of interesting

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that the NFL gave all the team's

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>license to have crowd noise. My assumption is they decided

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we're good without crowd noise, and it may make sense

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for some teams that offensively, they're like, you know, we

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really want a lot of crowd noise. We like

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to just run efficiently, and we think

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we run best when we don't have to deal with

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>crowd noise, even home crowd noise. Right, Yeah, I mean,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was a bad product just just

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>from listening to it. I don't know what it sounded

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like on TV, but I mean it was. It was

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty It was pretty excited. I thought, yep, all right,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>let's jump in. I did want to start the show

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>by first going around and asking everyone what did you

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>think was the biggest story coming out of that game. Obviously,

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of things that happened in that

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>game even before the game began. There were things that

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we that we found out just as the game was

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about to kick off. But I want to know from

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys, what do you think was the biggest story

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the game. Let's start first with you Amber.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that the biggest story for me was that

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>none of my questions were answered. I feel like I

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>walked out of this game with more questions than I

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>already had, so there. I think that overall, if you

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>look at each spot, maybe there's not a huge area

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of concern that sounds terrible. There are a huge concern

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but I just think I just think that honestly, waking

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>up today, I don't think the game was as bad

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as I thought initially. I don't feel terrible. My biggest

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>concern is, Okay, what happens now with the injuries. Those

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>are big questions for me, especially at the linebacker position,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and then some of the things that were happening in

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the defensive lining. You and I, Derek could argue all

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>day about it, but I did not walked out of

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that game pleased at all. Dave, I guess my big takeaway,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, it's week one, no preseason like all

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is fair to say, but if you're asking

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>me for one big takeaway, it's that after nine months

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of all that talk about hope and change, I saw

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a team that looked pretty damn similar to what we

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>watched all last year. Like across the board, shoot special

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>teams weren't terrible, but even special teams had a missfield goal,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>missed opportunity for points, costly drops by receivers, bad pass

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>protection at times. I thought the play calling looked pretty

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>vanilla for the most part, and then obviously the defense

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all of the familiar hallmarks. Pass rush that

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a whole lot for the most part, linebacker

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>player that didn't look up the snuff like. It looked

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot like last year, which is a bummer after

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the excitement and unknowns. Nick, I just thought,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, this offense just couldn't do anything, you know, consistently.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were gonna have a little bit more

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>firepower and and make more plays, and you know, they didn't.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>They were kind of they were stifled too many times

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and couldn't you know, extend the drives and get those

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 1>extra yards on third down just to keep it going,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and kept shooting themselves in the foot. I thought the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>offense was disappointing. Yeah, you look at this game overall,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of agree with with a little bit

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of all of what you guys have said about that.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It actually reminded speaking of what Dave was saying, it

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>actually reminded me of the playoff game when the Cowboys

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>went to play the Rams in LA a few years ago,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you look at how they used the

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mister direction, you look at how they use screens. They

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>basically negated the pass rush at the cow that we

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>were so excited to see the Cowboys put on display.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It really looked to me as though, you know, I

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot being made during this during training

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>camp of you know, being secretive and keeping stuff behind

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>closed doors because you know, you didn't want stuff out there.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Cowboys look to be way more surprised by

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>an offense with the Rams. And by the way, this

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is an offense that they've had on display for the

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. But the Cowboys look way more

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>shell shocked defensively than I think the Rams. Did you

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>guys agree with that? Yeah, I mean I do agree.

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this morning and literally the first thing

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought when my eyes opened, I'm like, the first

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that came to my mind was like McCarthy, seriously,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>all this secretive, all this hiding for what what you

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>do with that? Nothing? But this is another year of

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the cowboys. Here we go. Oh, Age, No, your tolerance

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for this is just so low, and I appreciate it.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that I was most shocked by that,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and that to me. I actually the one of the

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>things I was looking forward to was as much as

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy talked about how you know, he spent this year

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>away and he's really been studying the NFL and studying teams,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I expected that, if nothing else, they would come in

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>with this really unique game plan and unique way that

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 1>they were going to attack the RAMS. And like you said, David,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it felt to me, again they could have had a

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>really different game plan, but it felt like it was

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>much of the same stuff that they'd been doing. And

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe part of that is that your offensive coordinator at

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>least still the same guy. It's still the same guy

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>calling the play at the end of the day. Yeah,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>let's it does kind of strike a blow for Oh,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, it just it strikes a blow for the

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that, you know, the fun wild offense we saw

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the first three weeks of the Year. Last year was

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>all Kellen Moore and then Jason Garrett just just stomped

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all the creativity out of him. Because Jason Garrett's not here,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and that looked like, you know, weeks four to seventeen

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. I mean, and they had their moments, and

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're that talented, you're gonna have your moments. Zeke

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Elliott looked amazing last night. That's probably the biggest bright

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>spot of the entire game. But I just thought they

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>were boring and contrast that with some of the stuff

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams were doing. Yeah, it was a bummer. Let's

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the injuries that I think

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>is again Amber alluded to it, but I think that's

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a big story coming out of that game. You lose

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Layton vander Esh, you lose Blake Jarwin, you lose Cam Irving.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess first, Nick, you were on the trip. Have

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you heard anything more about what those injuries are and

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>how long each of those players will be out? Yeah.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I'm supposed to say this, but on

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the tenor on the seating chart going out, there was

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>three spots kind of in front of us that said

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>injured player, injured player, injured player, and like nobody was

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting in that. It just like three spots. Well, Blake

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin was sitting in that on the way back, and

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Irving was as well, and so I think, yeah,

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds like Blake Jarwin has a torn

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>acl That's what I mean, that's what the fear is.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what that's what it sounds like, and that it's

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think the MRI has come in just

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>yet to confirm that, but that's kind of what the

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>speculation is there. Um and and then just quickly, I

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mean Layton vander esh it looks like broken collar bone.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They can do a couple of different things there. Either

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like four to six or six to eight maybe,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna be out a little bit. And then Irving,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure on that one. On Cam Irving

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>just yet? Is it there are more than that? That's

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the three? That No, that's the three. And actually, to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I was I am actually pleasantly.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say surprised, but I'm actually happy

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with what we heard about LV because my first thought was, Oh,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we're back to the neck injury. Oh yeah, and and

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so when it ended up that it was a broken

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>collar bone, to me, that was that was somewhat of

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a relief because I just if it was the neck again,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that's when I start worrying about, like what does this

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mean for his long term uh, not only just playing career,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but what does this mean for his life? Right? I mean,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just I'm glad that it's something like that. That

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is a very like it is a bone. It is broken, right,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to do what you gotta do to heal it. Right, Yeah,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're right, it's not the same, but it's

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it's like Sean Lee, did he ever

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>had the same injury? Just had one every year? You know?

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, I hope you're not getting down that

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>road with him, But it's happening a linebacker. I mean,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>just start thinking about that, you know. And also to

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave and Amber on this one, But the sad part

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is is that they were thinn at tight end already

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and then he gets and then he gets her thinnet linebacker,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>thinnet right tackle. So it didn't help that these were

0:10:53.280 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>happening the positions already in question. Dave, Yeah, I mean,

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right, is you know those were the problem spots.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I don't think anybody expected Terrence

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Steele to be the starter, which you know didn't didn't

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sink the game. But again, like you're you're drastically thin there,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you lose I guess we thought cam Irving would be

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the starter, but you lose your primary backup instead. And

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, I mean linebacker, you still got a minimum

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of two weeks until Sean Lee is available. That looks

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>scary based on what we saw, man, I mean, I

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to overreact to one week, but that was

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>disheartening to say the least. Jalen Smith's performance. I thought

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Thomas seemed like he was fine, but I mean

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the Rams ran for one hundred and fifty yards. And

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>then I don't know what you do about tight end

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>because Dalton Schultz kind of I mean, he got an

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to step up. I mean, Blake went down in

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter, so you have two and a half

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>quarters to step up, and the early returns on that

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are not great. Two pretty big drops and a pass

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>interference pum Sean mccun. Sean mckun wasn't active for this game,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so we didn't get to see him, so and and

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bell played eight snaps um, which I didn't expect

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>him to have a huge role, But that's a pretty

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>low number for me. So, I mean, I don't I

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you do about tight end. If if

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Blake Jarwin is on a is gone for the season,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Cole Hiccottini's on the practice squad, I don't know if

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that is good enough to inspire confidence. Um. That's that's

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the most disheartening things to come out

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of this is that we got to watch one catch

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>from Blake Jarwin this year. Yeah, I hate it for

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>for Blake, but I think what's happening at linebacker is

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger issue for this team because as I

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>watched those linebackers play last night, they weren't diagnosing plays well. When,

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>especially when you got a team that does a lot

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of misdirection and screens, you want your linebackers being able

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to diagnose when they see those offensive linemen pulling. You

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>want them to be able to diagnose that quickly and

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>then be able to run to get there to support.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And they were slow and recognizing it. They were often

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in an out of position and then they couldn't get

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>off blocks and they didn't have the speed to get

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to the ball, and especially that first drive, if you

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>go back and watch that, it was a horrible drive

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for the linebackers. And I just I look at that

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>all around, and I'm really concerned. Now you've got two

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>guys right now that looks like we'll be injured for

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a while with Sean Lee and Layton vander esh Jalen

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Smith didn't play great. At this point, I'm like, maybe

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>get those young linebackers and put them in there and

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>let them play. Maybe they can run, maybe they can

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have better instincts. I don't know, but I just think

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>right now the Cowboys are struggling at the linebacker position.

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's put tack our first break when we come back.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into the segment we're gonna call

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>moments that mattered. We'll do it every Monday. I'm gonna

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>lay out some of the moments that I thought were

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>important in the game, and we'll talk about them and

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>see what you guys think that when we come right back.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're back in

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>new Doctor Peppery Creeps soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>bad and cream soda? Is he a Newcombonet's Music to

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>My ears? Okay? Doctor Batime, poll in a glass Music

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to My ears? And mouse new Doctor pepper and cream soda?

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>What delas just do? By? Hey? I want to use

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what the pros use? How about the official men's skincare

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now you

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>can get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The starter includes four Jack Clack skincare favorites, plus a

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>full sized and tense therapy whip bomb. Go to get

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>word team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys the Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping since

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American maid with pride

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas and and is proud to be

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Want to show your

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Team pride too? You can by purchasing your

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>own stetson. You can look just like how the flag

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>guys do on field at every home game. Stetson Hats

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop Dallas Cowboys

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com or at Stetson dot com. It's funny as

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we travel places, often we find the places we want

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to travel aren't really places at all. They're people, their grandparents, moms,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>old friends, and new nephews. That's why at American Airlines

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been using enhanced cleaning measures so you can feel

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>confident every step until you get to them. So, as always,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>our people can't wait to take you to yours. American Airlines.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You are why we fly back to the Break. Welcome back.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We're in the second segment of The Break from the

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>s WBC Mortgage studios. At the start, David Amber joining

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>us from their homes. We're talking about the Cowboys lost.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>They loose to the Los Angeles Rams to start the

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>season twenty seventeen. Let's get into this segment. We call Moments,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>set and Matter. I have four moments in the game

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that I thought were big moments for this team and

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of dictated what happened ultimately in the Cowboys loss.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first. With three fifty eight left in the

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>third quarter. It was third and seven at the Rams thirty.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Goff backs up to pass. He throws the ball. He's

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>throwing it to Jefferson's intercepted by Cheeto. The pressure on

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that play was created by Alden Smith, who forced that

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>bad throw which created the opportunity for Cheeto to be

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>able to get the interception. Obviously, on that play, as

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody saw in the replay, it was clearly a penalty.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Should have been a personal file against Alden Smith. But

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I really set this up to talk about it from

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of Alden Smith and how he played. Nick,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>tell me, what were your thoughts on Aldon Smith? Yet? Six?

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean sorry tackles, one sack, two quarterback hits. Well,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was a different snaker throughout the game.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a play that if the Cowboys had had one,

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>would have been one of those five. Don't forget about

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he made a nice tackle behind the line of scrimmage

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that led to a field goal that was missed by

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Early in the game. I thought he kind

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of turned the game around when it wasn't looking good early.

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought he just had really good pressure. It was

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>nice to see one of those pass rushers to get pressure.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, Nan, I guess talking about pressure, Dave,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>why why do you think the Cowboys weren't able to

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>generate much pressure? We saw all throughout training camp that

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that this defense seemed like they could

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>do really well was get after the passer. They didn't

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to do that very much last night. Honestly, you know,

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know you're asking me about the defense,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but it makes me think about the Cowboys offense. I think,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>not to let anybody off the hook, but I think

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it is the Rams did not

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>give the Cowboys a ton of opportunities to do that

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned at the beginning. I mean, how many how

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>many middle screens, receiver screens did we see? You know,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw it last night. The Rams social team made

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a super cut of Robert Woods's six catches for one

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five yards. Six catches for one hundred and

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>five yards. Four of them happened within ten yards of

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage, and three of them were behind

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage. Jared Goff was getting the ball

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>out fast as hell and Obviously, the Rams were concerned

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>about negating that pass rush, which the reason I bring

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>up the Cowboys offenses, why don't they do that? You

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>got a rookie right tackle, and like I said, I

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thought Terren Steele held up pretty well for his first

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL game. But you didn't see that type of play

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>calling or decision making from the Cowboys recognizing that, hey,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a game wrecking defensive tackle over there and your

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>line is a little compromised. I would have loved to

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen some more of that built into the offense

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>where you're not asking Dak to drop back that way. So,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the pass rush needs to be better,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of that was by design, I think

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams part. Yeah, it's interesting, Dave, because a

0:18:55.560 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>good amber I was gonna say, I mean, it's very

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>concerning to me the fact that the best defensive player

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was a guy that hasn't been playing for like what

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>it was in five years, So that is very concerning.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I was. I mean, I was expecting good things from

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Aldon Smith. He had a great camp, but at the

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>same time you talked about all this other talent that's

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there in the line, and they weren't able to play

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>up to the expectations once again, and many many issues there.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about the Rams, I think we

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>saw it last week when we were analyzing the Rams.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is the best team that they're

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be facing here in the first weeks of

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the season. So again, when you compared the Rams and

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what they got their talent wise, I don't think the

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys should have played the way that they did. Let's

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and move on to that next moment. It

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>was twelve to twenty six left in the fourth quarter.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>This time it's third and six at the Ram fourteen.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You had a run by Zeke for three yards, and

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's fourth and three. Cowboys decide instead of kicking

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the field goal that they're going to throw the pass.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>They throw a pass to Ceedee Lamb on a crossing route.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>He has tackled short of the first down marker turnover

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>on downs. My first question for you guys is the

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>big question I think most fans are talking about today.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Do we think it was a good decision for the

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to forego the field goal up to attempt in

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>favor of trying to get the first down. Let's start

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with you Nick. Yes, I think it was a good decision,

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's a question you have to ask yourself before

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the result. I mean sometimes that that happens like that

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>playing and simple for me, Dallas wasn't the better team

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>last night. I thought the Rams were better. I think

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone could see that. I think the coach could see that.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And you get to a point in the game where

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you're like, Okay, we could try to we could tie

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>this up and all that, but we need to go

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>take the lead. We need to put the pressure on them.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we can stop them. I think

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>they thought they had a good call there and let

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy go make a play and you know he

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ran it too short and and you know, maybe it

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was his fault or someone else's. But I like the aggressiveness.

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's the type of coach McCarthy's going

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in the sixteen game season. I think fans

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>are gonna like that aggressiveness more than the is showed

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in that particular moment. I don't have a problem with

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the call Camber. I like the call. I don't like

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the play that they decided to go with on fourth

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and third. I think I would have chosen to probably

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, especially when Zeke was the one that

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>has been carrying the offense pretty much throughout the game.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And I get it that Ceedee Lamb, We've seen the

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>amazing talent that he has, but when it comes to

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a fourth down call me personally, I would try to

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>rely on a veteran guy and not a rookie. And

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a little blame on both sides.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was a good call and just Ceedee Lamb

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the right turn and get in the right

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>position that he needed to do. But all in all,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>good call, bad played decision, I think, Dave. I'm I'm

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so happy that me and Nick are on the same

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>side of a philosophy question because I feel like that's

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>where we typically butt heads. But I liked it. I mean, yeah,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the play didn't work. I thought, Dalton, you know,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>they ran a mesh concept with two receivers go in

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>opposite ways. I thought, Dalton Schultz probably could have run

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>his route deeper to draw defenders away. Ceedee Lamb, obviously,

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe run your route to the sticks next time. Also,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jordan Fuller made a hell of a play

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, Like as we always say, like the

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>other guys get paid too. Jordan Fuller awesome play on

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>his part. That happens sometimes. But I thought, you know,

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys were outplayed. It's one thing if you really

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>trust your defense and you want to play that game

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and kick a fuel goal and you think you can

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>stop him, that's fine. I don't think anybody felt confident

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>about that. I love the idea of going to get

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown, taking the lead, and dictating the last eight

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nine minutes of the game. We talk about how the

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>pass rush couldn't generate pressure because of the way the

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Rams were playing. That's a way to fix that is

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to take a you know, a four point lead that

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>takes the Rams out of the field goal game and

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of helps them play into your hands a

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I loved it, and for that matter, something

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we always hated about the way Jason Garrett did things.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>In Jason Garrett's era, they would have run the play

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on third down, see what they got, and decided what

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to do from there. They probably would have burned a

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>time out discussing it. Jason Garrett would have looked really angry.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>But and I don't know this. We can talk to

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Kellen Moore about it later today. From my vantage point,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it looked like Kellen Moore saw a favorable look in

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the box and said, all right, let's see what Zeke

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>can do on this third and six, and we're gonna go.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go on fourth down no matter what happens

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>unless they lose yards. And and we're thinking two plays ahead.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>That's something that they never did under Garrett. Absolutely were,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking a play ahead, which they never did before.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work. But I love the aggressiveness of it.

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, people that are mad about it, basically you're

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>just saying you only want to go for it if

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're in no man's land. It's not Jason Garrett did

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>not true at all. No, I want to hear it.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear your part. Well, no, here's the deal.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's the deal I think. And first of all, I'm

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>not one of those people that was on Jason Garrett

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>about those kinds of decisions. I tend to be more

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>conservative when it comes to games like that. A very

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>very close game. You got teams in my opinion, that

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>were pretty evenly matched. I know, as we were looking

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at it, we're thinking of cowboys the defense playing horrible

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>offense can't get it done. But this was a close game.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>These teams were evenly matched, and in a game like that,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, you give your chance, your team every chance

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to win, and you give your team every chance to

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>stay in the game. And I look at just the

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>previous series before that Cowboys stalled on the RAM fifteen.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was where they had the same thing,

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>had two incompletions and end up having to kick a

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>field goal. And my thought is what gave him confidence

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in that moment after just on the previous drive you

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>had two get in completions to finish it off to

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>where you had to kick the field goal. What made

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you think on this drive, all of a sudden, you're

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>now going to get that first down and keep your

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>drive alive. I hadn't seen a lot of consistency from

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this offense throughout the day. I didn't have very much confidence.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>My thought is you do what you're gonna do on

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>third down. I love the play call. By the way,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down, I think the idea was right. I

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think you were trying to get that rub to where

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:19.959
<v Speaker 1>to where you could get this guy free. And by

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, if he gets free. Oh my god, he's

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>probably may get to the end zone, who knows. But

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so I love the play call. I think they should

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have done that on third down. And then if you

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>get the first down, great, If you don't, you take

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the points. You live to fight another day and you

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>still are in this game, right. I think at twenty

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen, as we saw it, like it just there

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough there. I didn't think you were gonna necessarily

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just drive right back down and get right back into

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>position if you didn't get it, I think you needed

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>those three points. Yeah, but I just think to just

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to make just to say when you said, who's you know,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>why did he think that? Why did he think that

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen? You know when the previous you know,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>possession on offense. But you could also make the case, well,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, what makes them think that they're gonna get

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball back of the game tied and their kicker

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna make a lung field goal? You know? I mean, like,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not only did he did he miss the kick, it

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he was kind of getting close to those

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>uprights and some of the other ones as well. So

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how confident they were The one thing

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I will say though, and I think we've all noticed

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this during training camp. Sirline has been pretty money during

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>training camp. The one area he hasn't been is fifty plus.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So that fifty three miss, I don't put that on him.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It is what it is. You miss fifty three yards,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, Like that is not a huge deal. So

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're you're playing. You're playing to get yourself

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>into at least a forty six, forty seven or less,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is the way I look at it. I'm not unless

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely have to. I'm not necessarily lying on him

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to kick fifty plus yard field goals. But again, I

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just feel like at that point they had a better

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>opportunity take your three points, tie up the game, and

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>let's see where it goes from that second down. How

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>about that? I mean, he fired that ball in his

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>shouts and he dropped it. I mean it was a

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tough catch, but it was There's so many moments in

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that game where Schultz's name came up and it wasn't positive.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just it's kind of amazing that that

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where they were, but the fact that

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they felt like he was the best option to come

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in after you know, Jarwin goes down. Does make me

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>wonder a bit like what's happening with Blake Bell they,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they went out and signed him as a

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>free agent. My expectation was he was the second tight

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>end on this team, but it does not look like

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that from what we've seen. It's going to answer that

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>first day. Blake Bell is not that guy. I mean,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>he's never He's really never been receiving tight end in

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>his entire career. Granted, I know Dalton Schultz has done

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>much of anything. Hey either, I know that, but I

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that that's Blake Bell. I don't think was brought

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>here to be a viable part of the passing game,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not on a regular basis At this point, do you

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think they have to? And I honestly, unless they are

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sold that Cole Hiccottini can do it, then I don't

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>know that they that they might have to go look

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. You know, people are tweeting me about Delaney

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Walker or trading for David Joku. I don't know. I mean,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he's on the practice squad. He seemed to have a

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>decent camp. But if that's not the answer, then I

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>don't think the answers on the team right now, honestly,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, obviously we're already getting sarcastic tweets

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about what we saw at training camp. I stand by

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what I said. Dalton Schultz had a really solid training camp.

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But the thing you got to remember is every year

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>at training camp, somebody looks good in practice and wilts

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>when the lights come on in the preseason. The differences,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have a preseason, so not all of them,

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not all of these guys were going to

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be ready when the lights came on, and it's one week.

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, I mean Dalton Schultz, he had

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a built in opportunity to make his case when Blake

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>went down and it didn't happen for him, and I

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think they can get away with letting that be

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for too many more games. Let's go ahead and take

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>our chefs. I was. I was just gonna say, I'm

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>no scout and I barely know any football, but based

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on everything that I've seen from Schultz, I have not

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seen a single thing that makes me want to keep

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>him on the team. And I know that he had

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a second good half of training camp, but at the

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>same time, not enough for him to earn that second

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>spot right behind Blake Jarwin. He just he has not

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>done enough to be a guy that you can be

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>relying on, and he clearly showed that. And I know,

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not fair to say because again, like Dy've

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that haven't had preseason games and sometimes it takes

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>guys a few games to kind of get going. But

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, there is no way that the

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys can keep going to this second week just relying

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on this guy. All Right, We're gonna take our final

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>break when we come back. We have a couple more

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>moments from that game than we gotta talk about when

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American maid

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to be on the field with America's team. Want to

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>show your Texas and team pride too, You can by

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>purchasing your own stetson. You can look just like how

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the day, I was the guy who always got

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the tough yards, and that's why I run with John

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Deer today. In fact, I have a John Dear three

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any yardwork

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I need to do, even the tough yards way out back.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you have one acre or a thousand, John

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Deer has the equipment that's just right for you. Visit

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a John Deer dealer today and run with us. We

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>are the official tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. I

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>want to use what the pros use. How about the

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter, a

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized and tense therapy lip bomb.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys, the Jack Black Starter ten bucks

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>free shipping. We're backing the Tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper and cream Soda.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen, Doctor Baba cream sodas he a

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Newcombonut's music to My Ears? Okay, Doctor bad Time pass

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Music to My Ears and mouse new Doctor Pepper and

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Cream Soda. What delas just do? Back back to the break,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It is the final segment of the show.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a Monday, for sure. It's definitely a Monday, and

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a Monday after a late game, and it

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>feels a little bit like it's a loss. So I

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's kind of feeling like football season is

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>here because the energy is a little a little bit

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.239
<v Speaker 1>weird today. But we're gonna power through that and by

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow we're gonna be back and ready to get you

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>guys ready for the next game, Cowboys versus Falcons. But

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we do have a couple more moments from this game

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think we need to go through because I

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think they were important to the game. It was five

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen left in the fourth quarter h third and fifteen

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Dallas seventeen Cowboys tried to throw our Dak

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to throw a pass to a Mari. It would

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have been a seven yard game. He kind of grasped

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it for a moment and then Jalen Ramsey put a

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>big hit on him and he let go of the ball.

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>My question for you guys is do you have fault

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with a Mari over that or is that just one

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of those plays where Jayleen just made it. I mean,

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>jay Ramsey just made a great play. Kellen Moore, I

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with Kellen Moore on that play. Okay,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey's covering Michael Gallop. Why are they right there?

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Spread the field a little bit. He comes off of

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup, he's running, He's there's too close. If it

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Gallup needs to clear or get out of the way.

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Get Jalen Ramsey out of the way because he comes

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>off of that and makes that hit on him. Yeah,

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>catch the ball, Mary Cooper, that's what twenty million dollars

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a year is supposed to be. But at the same time,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>get the All Pro one hundred million dollars cornerback out

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the picture. And I thought that was a kind

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of a bad play design by them, Camber, I think

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination of both. Honestly, Amari Cooper, that wasn't

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the only play where he just didn't seem to be

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>doing what he's supposed to do as a receiver in

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with his hands. He there were several locations where you

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just felt like he didn't want to catch the ball

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>or something. Again, I might be the road game theme

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe come back again this year. We'll see, but he

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just needs to play better as far as that. Dak Prescott, Honestly,

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought he had a pretty nice game. I know

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people are criticizing him in this game,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but I thought he did a nice job based on

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what he had and what could do. I think that

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>play was more on Amari Cooper. Yeah, for reference dec Head,

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>he was twenty five or thirty nine, two hundred and

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yards a touchdown, no interceptions, and then had

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a thirty yards rushing All in all, a pretty pretty

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>good day for Dak Prescott. Dave, did you find fault

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with Cooper on not catching that ball? Yeah? I remember

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>being shocked last night when I said I found fault

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with it, and you were kind of like I don't know.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey's pretty good. I'm like, I'm no, twenty million dollars.

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It hits you in both hands. You gotta you have

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to make that play. And I know it's hard, that's

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the NFL. It's always gonna be hard.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You have And look, I mean, everybody knows I'm the

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Dak apologist. That's fine. But that drop, the bizarre sequence

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>where Amari was running across and the ball hit him

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on the thigh and he like looked surprised that the

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ball was there, very weird. And then we already brought

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>up Schultz. But I mean two or two or three

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>players that could have extended drives and helped that third

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>down number that Dak just didn't didn't get as much

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>help as he could have. That's for sure. You brought

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>up that third down number. Dak was one of seven

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>on third downs, not a great number, um and then

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously on the final drive of the game, he couldn't

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>get his team down there to to score to win.

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys at all concerned that maybe this is

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.479
<v Speaker 1>what we were seeing last year? The Cowboys behind Dak

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just good enough to be in the game, not good

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to get the win. Yeah, it's concerning the clutch.

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The clutchness, that's a word, is not there um like

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it should be, and we just haven't seen it. We

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen them beat teams that are good teams, and

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen him come back at all in the

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>second half. So that's that's a that's or you know,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a concerning trend. It's early. I mean, this

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is early in the season. They're a close game, a

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of plays here and there, but like Dave and

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Amber both said, it was like like we've seen last year,

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's what we're supposed to see. A bunch

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of big changes. We really didn't the final moment that

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I did want to talk about, Dave gs, I'm on

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that Wait can I can? I I'd have to rebut

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there because yeah, I mean, I'm and hey, they didn't

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get it done. They lost. I get it, and and

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of blame to go around. Dack certainly

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't perfect, but I saw clutch moments. I saw a

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>hell of a gutsy, freaking run on a third and

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven to put the ball near the marker. I saw

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>him hit Michael gallop and stride for forty seven yards

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on a throw that would have changed the game. We're

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>getting there, we can argue about I know we're gonna

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>get I mean, the throw was the throw was freaking money. Yeah,

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it was time. I consider that clutch I and I,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>like I said, you know, if if if, ifs and

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>butts and all that fun stuff didn't win the game.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>But I thought Dak Prescott played a hell of a

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>game and didn't get as much help as he could have.

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I saw the same things as last year

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the offense was nowhere near as

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>innovative as I think it could be with the amount

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of talent that they have, and the guys around Dak

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't help him as much as they could have. Amari

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Cooper two plays that could have been made to extend drives,

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz miscues in the red zone killing touchdown chances.

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>But I have a hard time putting most of it

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on Dak Prescott. That's for sure. You alluded to it.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And I want to get to this final moment that

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought was pretty much the game. If you want

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up the game, it was the game. It

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was the moment that probably would have turned this game.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Thirty one seconds left in the game. It was third

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and ten from the Dallas thirty four. Doesn't look great, obviously,

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty bleak. But Cowboys or Dak Prescott throws the

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>ball deep to Michael Gallop forty seven yards would have

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>been the completion down to the Dallas nineteen. Here goes

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fly offensive pass interference against Michael Galloped A big question.

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with the call? Let's start with you Amber.

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people are disagreeing heavily, but

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I honestly I'm okay with it. I think that when

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy, from my understanding, when the receiver fully extend

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that arm, that causes for the ref to bring attention

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to it, and usually it gets called that way. I

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>think that it should not have depended on that specific play.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate when games get to the point, and I

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>know that's part of football. It all can come down

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to one single play. But at the same time, the

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys should not have been in that position to begin with.

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And many people want to start nominating this guy for

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>an Oscar and all that, but hey, that's another part

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the game, you say. I know it's not soccer,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>but Hey, if you gotta do what you gotta do

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to play it up and fake more if you want

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and cause a scene to get what you need you're

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to get as far as the game. But all

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in all, I just think the play the call. I

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree fully, but at the same time, I just

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think you should have depended all in that single play.

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave you agree with the call by the strict by

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the strict letter of the law, it was probably the

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>right call because, in my personal opinion, the game moves

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so fast. NFL referees have touchstones that they look for.

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You can the dead thing in Green Bay is a

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect example. By the strict letter of the law, the

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>ball moves when he hits the ground, he doesn't have

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>control going to the ground. They call it an incompletion.

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>By the strict letter of the law. It's probably right,

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>but it's Bogan. So the NFL sees the arm fully extended,

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they look for. They say, oh, his

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>elbow is all the way extended. That's a push off.

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a flag. But really, with thirty seconds to play,

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>all pro corn back against eleven yard receiver, like nobody

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>wants to see Lebron win the game at the free

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>throw line. We want to see plays, we want to

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>see fun stuff and the balls on the nineteen Cowboys

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have a time out. By no means is it a

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that they're gonna win or even tie the game

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from that distance. Like, there's still plenty to play for.

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like the penalty completely swings the game.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You just gotta let football players play football in that instance.

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But by the strict letter of the law, I don't

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with it. I just think learned to

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>know the situation referee. After the after that play, I

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of text messages and I got I

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>got all three of them. I got dog, horse, and chicken.

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Huh yeah, all of them. And I was not huh

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>uh oh no, no, yeah, bull not dog, Sorry, okay,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>wow yeah bullick in horse Okay. And I you know,

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, since it was gallup, I

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think it was closer to horse. I think, I mean,

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, a terrible joke there, But I do think

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a very bad call. At the time I

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. I thought it was a bad call.

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought Jalen sold it well. But let me ask

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you this next week, that same situation and Julio Jones

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Brown are running down the sideline, do you

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>think that call is thrown that way? I just think

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a reputation, Like Michael Gallup cannot do this

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to Jalen Ramsey. I honestly, but I personally don't believe

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in football rests get into that. I think that's a

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>basketball thing. I do think you gets you get calls

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>based upon your reputation in the NBA. I don't think

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that happens in football as much. That's my personal opinion.

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think next, and here's where I thought you

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>were going with that, is if next week that exact

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>same situation plays out and Julio is there with Anthony

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Brown and his arm is fully extended, how many of

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the people that are saying that call should not have

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>been made last night are gonna say, yeah, good job,

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ref his arm was extended. I think we all agree

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or should agree that, according as Dave says, according to

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the letter of law, it was appenally. Now, whether you

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>want to call it in that situation, I can see

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that that may be one of those things where it's

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's so, it's so light of an infraction that

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't let the game hinge on that. And to me,

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the game hinged on that, And so maybe you don't

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>make yourself a part of the game in that way

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're the referee making that call. But it's hard

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>for me to say that it was a bad call.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>That was the right call. It just the question is

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 1>whether he should have made it or not. In my opinion,

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen worse, which he shouldn't have. Yeah, I just

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen I've seen worse, and I just think it's

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a situation where, you know, defenders do a lot, you know,

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse to get the call, But on offense,

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like any kind of push or anything like that.

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're calling that a lot more now, you know.

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Then it's kind of like the block charge in basketball.

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, it just seems like it's a lot easier

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>now to get a charge than a block call because

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone's kind of looking for it now. So I don't know,

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this rule I asked you this before,

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or is PI not challengeable anymore? I know it would

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>have to be a booth review, But did they get

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of that? I didn't see it at all yesterday.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>There's been a thousand rule changes. I don't know if

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that was one of them. Yeah. I didn't see any

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>calls in the football I watched yesterday of an offensive,

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a challenge or whatever. But it would have been nice

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to look at it because then you would have seen

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey kind of it would have been Booth review anyway, right,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 1>booth review. But at least you see that he's acting.

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think in that instance. Again, I don't

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think they changed the call because although we think he

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was acting, the fact is he extended his arm and

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the player went back. Now it was acting, we all

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>get it, but that's still gonna be. I don't think

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're gonna overturn now. I think I can

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>make a decision whether you want to make the call.

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you overturn it based on that. When

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 1>did Michael Gallery gets picked up on review? Yeah? Yeah,

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I agree, But I just didn't realize gallup and hit

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the weight rooms like that. Geez all right, guys man,

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you joining us today. It's been a it's

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>been a rough first first week. We're gonna get together tomorrow.

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back on the air at eleven thirty, and

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start moving forward. We're gonna get some big

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>picture looks at this team. We're gonna re redo our

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>our segment that we did last Friday of I know,

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think and I have no idea. We're gonna talk

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about those things. We'll bring some of

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones we had from last week up and see

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>if there's any clarity in some of those, but also

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you some new ones, some fresh ones give

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you a bigger perspective look at this team as we

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get ready for Cowboys versus Falcon. So then for Nick Even,

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I am Derek Eagleton. This has

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.