WEBVTT - Special Episode: Dr. Rageshri Dhairyawan & Unheard

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and this is this podcast will

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Kill You. You are listening to the latest episode in our

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>special series we're calling the tpw k Y Book Club.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>This isn't your typical book club where you spend about

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the time talking about the actual book

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>selection and the other ninety percent eating tasty snacks and

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>drinking tasty drinks and talking about a million other things,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which I absolutely love. By the way, shout out to

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>my real life book club. In the TPWKY book Club,

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which I also adore. We're staying on topic, getting to

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hear directly from the authors themselves about what inspires them,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>how writing change their outlook, what they most want people

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to take away from their book, and so much more.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So far this season, we've explored books on topics ranging

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>across the fields of medicine, science, and history, and there

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is still so much more to come. If you'd like

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to check out the full list of books we've covered

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so far and the ones later to come, check out

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>our website This Podcast will Kill You dot com, where

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>under the Extras tab you'll find a link to our

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bookshop dot Org affiliate page. There we have several TPWKY

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>booklists covering everything podcast related, including a book club list

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can see all of the books featured in

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>these book club episodes. And one last thing before we

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get into the book of the week, that is to

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>please rate review Subscribe really helps us out so much,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and also share your thoughts with us. We always love

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Think of the last time you

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke with a doctor about a concern that you had.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>How long did the doctor spend with you. Do you

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like they were present in the room or did

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they seem distracted checking emails, typing up notes with half

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a mind on the conversation. Did you get all of

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your questions answered? Did the doctor give you time to

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>ask questions? How did you feel at the end of

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the appointment. Did you feel listened to, understood, cared after,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>reassured or did you feel gas lit, condescended to dismissed, unheard.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully your experience falls into the first category of emotions,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>but I know that many, if not all, of you, have,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point or another, been made to feel the latter.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Going to a doctor's appointment, whether for a routine checkup

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or a specific prim problem or concern, can be a

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>very vulnerable experience. It's no exaggeration to say that you

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are putting your life and health into their hands, and

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>when that trust is broken, the damage can be severe,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>both in the short as well as the long term.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the physician patient relationship and the

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>way that medicine is practiced today that lends itself to

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this pattern of dismissal. That's exactly what doctor Ragastri Darowan

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>explores and unheard the medical practice of silencing. Doctor Darrewan,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>who is a sexual health and HIV doctor with the

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>NHS as well as a health equity researcher and science communicator,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>draws upon her own experience as both patient and physician

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to examine this nuanced topic from multiple perspectives. Through her research,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>she demonstrates that this problem of silencing patients is not

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a matter of a few doctors acting negligent or being

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>too exhausted to properly listen, but rather a systemic issue

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in medicine, where the foundations of patient dismissal are laid

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>out during medical school training and perpetuated by the medical system,

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and as minoritized groups are disproportionately more likely to be

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>silenced by their health care providers. They are also more

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to suffer the negative health consequences that being unheard

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>carries with it. Compounding this are the knowledge gaps that

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to be wider for conditions primarily impacting minoritized groups,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of research priorities that designate funding and resources

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to more prestigious diseases. To say this matter is complex

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is an understatement in the extreme. Fortunately, doctor Derrewan's clear

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and compassionate approach in Unheard expertly guides readers through the

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>factors enabling the continued silencing of patients and crucially suggests

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how positive change can be made by individuals during training

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at an institutional level and at a systemic level. I

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>truly loved this book and this conversation for getting to

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the heart of this issue, for exploring not just why

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>does it happen, but also providing a roadmap for how

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it can get better. And I am so excited to

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>share this conversation with you all. So let's get into it,

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Darwan. I'd like to just first thank you so

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>much for chatting with me today. Welcome to this podcast

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Kill You book Club.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for the invites and I'm really

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>really excited to be here.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Your book, Unheard the Medical Practice of Silencing was a

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>truly compelling blend of infuriating and enlightening, and I suspect

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that it will resid with many many people. I also

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think it should probably be required reading for medical practitioners

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>as a part of both initial and continued training. Can

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you describe your journey to writing this book and how

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>your experience on both sides of the power dynamic as

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>both physician and patient influenced the approach that you took.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So, I think it's been coming for a really long

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>time and kind of this year is my twentieth year

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of being a doctor, so you know, probably all of

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>my career it's been coming. And my work, my day

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>work is I work in sexual health and HIV, so

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I work with some really kind of minoritized patients who

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>are people who aren't heard generally in policy, who you know,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>who are often very poor, they have HIV stigmatizing disease.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>So part of that is my work with them, I think.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But what really.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Instigated the book were my experiences as being a patient.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So I was diagnosed with endometriosis when I was trying

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to get pregnant, which was unsuccessful, and kind of went

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>on to have fertility treatment. And during one of those

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 2>fertility cycles, I was on a lot of hormones and

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I developed really really bad abdominal pain, like excruciating pain,

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the worst I'd ever had. So my husband took me

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to the emergency department. Initially I was seen, I was given,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, really strong painkillers, and then I was admitted

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to the ward and they were really worried that I

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>had this thing called ovarian torsion, which is when the

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>ovary is so big from the hormonal stimulation that it

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>twists on itself and you need urgent surgery. But a

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>scan showed I didn't, but I was still in a

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of pain, which I thought was due to kind

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>of a flare up with the endometriosis.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 3>From the hormones.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>And whilst on the ward, I asked for more pain relief,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>but I refused it. Basically the medical team didn't seem

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 2>to believe that I was in so much pain. They

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>treated me like I was just trying to get morphine

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 2>because I wanted it, and it was a really shocking

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>experience for me. At that point, I'd been a doctor

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>for quite a long time senior, and I just thought,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, if this could happen to me, this experience

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of being disbelieved when asking for pain relief, what on

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>earth happens to everybody else? And in the end, I needed,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, my partner to advocate for me. I thought,

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, what if you can't speak English, what if

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't have a partner. I know how the healthcare

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 2>system works. What if you don't know how it works?

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>What happens to everyone else? So that was really what

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>instigated it. And also the fact that at the time

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I didn't complain, and I didn't complain afterwards either. I

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>felt really ashamed and I felt silenced for quite a

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>long time. And it wasn't until kind of maybe six

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>or seven years later that I started to do some

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>writing and I ended up writing about this and really

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>reflecting on why did I feel so silenced? And this

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>really came together into the book. But also the factor,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm a patient, but I'm a doctor patient,

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not just any old patient. And I'm a

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.119
<v Speaker 2>doctor and I know very well that despite my best.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Intentions, I don't always listen well.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And you know, much as I love to say that

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>every single patient I've seen will say they had the

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>best experience with me.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 3>That's probably not true.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>So I thought the book was a really good opportunity

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to look at why we don't listen and who doesn't

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>get listened to.

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you use the terms deliberately silenced and

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>preferably unheard to describe those patients who are ignored by

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>medical practitioners. Who are those individuals most likely to be

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and what does being silenced or unheard look like? Because

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be a great many things, sometimes maybe not

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as obvious as just like thinking about, oh, someone is

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>going I don't believe you like that is not often

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>how it comes out.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I think when I started the book, I thought it

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 2>was just some people who go unheard, But during my

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>research I actually found out that actually all patients go unheard.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure we'll talk more about why that is.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>But obviously some patients go more unheard than others. And

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>these are often people from minoritized groups. So these people

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>who when they speak, they're seem to be less credible

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 2>when they speak, so they're less likely to be seen

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 2>as trustworthy and less likely to be believed.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 3>And these, as I said, are.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>People who from minoritized groups, people of color, women, people

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>who are very old or very young, people who are

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>LGBTQ plus, so they're just less trusted and therefore less

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>listened to. And I realize it's not just patients you

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>go unheard in healthcare. It's also minoritized doctors, minoritized researchers,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>and this can happen at a global level as well.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of thing about when you think about

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 2>the patient doctor kind of contact thing, people are dismissed,

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 2>they're not believed. They can feel like they're being gas lit.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>So you know, that's really that phrase, it's all in

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>your head. They might feel like that, and they just

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>may feel like they've been ignored. So they've gone, you know,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>at their most vulnerable with their concerns to their doctor,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and the doctors kind of said okay, but then they

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>haven't acted on their concerns, so perhaps you know, they

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't reassured them or refer them or done a test.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are different ways in which people

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 2>can feel unheard, but I think that feeling of being

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 2>gas lit is a really common one.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You also introduce the term epistemic injustice as a framework

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand the ways people feel unheard in medicine. Can

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you take us through this term in the different types

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of epistemic injustice.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>This was a term which comes from philosophy, So the

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>British philosopher Miranda Frica coined it in two thousand and seven,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and she basically define this as being a wrong occurring

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to someone in their capacity as a noah. So basically,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>as humans, we like to create knowledge and we like

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to be able to pass it on. It's part of

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>what makes us human. And when we can't do this,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>we experience an injustice. And you know, this is one

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>injustice amongst many other injustices that people who are minoritized

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>might face. And there are a couple of types of

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 2>epistemic injustice. There's one called hermeneutical injustice and one called

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>testimonial injustice, and I talk about both, but I think

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to concentrate more on testimonial injustice here because

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's something that people will identify with. With

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>testimonial injustice, it's basically, when someone speaks, the listener is

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 2>less likely to believe what they say or listen to

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>them because they don't feel they're credible due to aspects

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 2>of their social identity. So for example, if you are

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a woman of color, you may not be seen as

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>being credible, so you're less likely to be listened to.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's often minoritized people who experience this testimonial injustice,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and they experience what's called a credibility deficit, so they're

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>not seen as being credible speakers by the listener. And

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>actually it can happen in the other way as well,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>so you can experience an injustice if you are taken

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>too seriously, so you can have a credibility excess. So

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, quite commonly it's white men who speak on something.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Actually they don't know that much about. I don't know

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 2>if you've seen this anywhere.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Noe, never, I've never experienced that.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>So they say something and people are like, yes, probably right,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>so I'll believe them. So they actually also experienced an injustice,

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>but perhaps one that doesn't cause them harm so much.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>When a medical provider does not listen to or ignores

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>their patient's concerns, that can impact both whether that person

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>receives care at all, as well as the quality of

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>care received. What are some of the immediate and long

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>term health impacts of being unheard.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think the most kind of immediate thing is

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>that you just you don't get treated or diagnosed. So

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you're telling you know, your doctor your symptoms and then

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>nothing is done, so you may not be referred for tests,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>so you may have like a delayed diagnosis, or you

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>may have the wrong diagnosis misdiagnosis, or you may get

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the wrong treatment or no treatment at all. And I

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>think in its extreme sense, it can be very dangerous.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>It can be very harmful. I think we see all

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the time in kind of patient safety reports. So for example,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot about maternal mortality, both here in

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the UK and in the US, and a lot of

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the reports say that women and their relatives say that

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they are not listened to or believed when they are

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>experiencing care. So kind of at its worst, it can

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 2>even cause death. In terms of kind of the more

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>other long term things, I think if you are routinely

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 2>not listened to by your health care provider, routinely not heard,

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>it means that you're kind of less likely to go

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 2>back to them, so you don't trust them.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>It increases mistrust.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>And you might think, you know, I actually don't want

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to tell them what's going on. So you may avoid

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>healthcare or you may self censor. So if your doctor says,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's happening with your treatment, how's it going

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>for you, and you've told them time and time again

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that you're getting side effects, you might just give up

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh no, they're fine. But in your own time,

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>just stop taking the tablets for example. So I think

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you can have, you know, a real effect of silencing

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.119
<v Speaker 2>mistrust and kind of health care avoidance.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break here, and when we get back,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>there's still so much to discuss. Welcome back everyone. I've

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>been chatting with doctor Ragashri Derewan about her book Unheard,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the Medical Practice of Silencing. Let's get back into things.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The dismissal of patients by healthcare providers is not something

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that happens spontaneously, as you point out, it is an

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>explicit and implicit part of training where the foundations are

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>laid out for their hierarchical relationship between physician and patient.

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about what that training is like and

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>why it's viewed as an essential part of patient care.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I talk quite a bit about medical school

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in one of the chapters because I think that's really

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 2>where we start to develop this almost skepticism of the

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 2>patients already coming from a thought that we don't believes

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>right from the beginning. So one of the ways in

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>which we talked about medicine, particularly in the West, is

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the bimedical approach. So this is where we think of

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the disease being separate to the patient, so it's not

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>part of them as a whole. It's a separate thing.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And our job as doctors is essentially to find the

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>diagnosis and then treat the patient, So we don't really

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>think of a patient as a whole, and it means

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>that we don't necessarily provide holistic care.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So it really teaches.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Us to keep a distance from the patient, and it

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>means that we're more likely to have boundaries. And I'm

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>not saying boundaries are bad. Boundaries are a good thing

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>as well, but sometimes when we have very rigid boundaries,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 2>we don't listen as well as we can do. And

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>it means that we as a doctor, we hold the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>knowledge and the expertise, and it means that we can

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>be very paternalistic because we think we know best, we

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>know better than the patient themselves about their own bodies.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think the other things about medical school is, certainly,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, as medical students, you've come through so much

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to get to where you are.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, you've passed.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Exams, you are you know, some of the cleverest people

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>at university, and you're taught together because you have long hours,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>so you kind of end up really being tight as

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a group. And I think that separation and that feeling

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>of being special and separate to other students means that

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 2>we can develop a sense of hubris or excessive pride,

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and again that can make us seem kind of more

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>unapproachable and less empathic. And I think the other thing

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 2>about the biomedical approach that I was saying is if

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>our job as doctors is to diagnose and fix, that's

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>what we think our role is, but we don't think

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>about other ways in which we could treat patients. So,

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 2>for example, there is value in more holistic care, and

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I don't think we think about that, So we

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>are less likely to listen, for example, when someone is

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 2>telling us something that we don't know how to fix.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So if someone, for example, has an issue with chronic

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>pain and we don't know what to do about it,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>then we find that uncomfortable because we can't fix them,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and that makes us really question our role as doctors,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>so we might be more likely to shut them down

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and not listen to them. But I think if we

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 2>were taught to find more value in listening as being

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>therapeutic in itself, so being witnessed to somebody who is suffering,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>then I think we would see our role as being

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>more healers rather than fixers, and we would be better

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 2>at listening in that way. And there's a couple of

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>other things at medical school which I think contribute to

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>this not listening as well.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 3>We learn very early on to.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Be very focused with our history taking, and you know,

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>that is a good thing because you know, we need

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to find out what's going on with the patient, but

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it means we kind of strip away everything else

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 2>that we don't think is important, and again that makes

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 2>us not as good listeners. I have this concept in

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 2>the book of something called the ideal patient. So you know,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>someone has a heart attack, they present in a specific way,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>we kind of know what we expect them to say,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but if they present in an atypical way or they

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>respond in a way that we don't necessarily expect them

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to that we haven't been taught to that we're more

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 2>likely to be skeptical of them and doubt them and

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>not listen to them. So I think there's lots of

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>things in medical school in the way that we're taught

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>which really makes it less easy for us to learn

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to listen better.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Also, in your book, you present these quotes from the

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth and seventeenth century discussing how or instructing physicians to

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>doubt their patients and question their intentions. So it goes

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>back literally like we're fighting hundreds of years of this.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>How is this tendency to doubt still reflected in the

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>language used in medicine and enabled by the power dynamic

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of physician patient relationships.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So I was really shocked when I found how long

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>it has been going on for actually, like I didn't

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>realize it had gone on for so long. So yeah,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 2>I think it is ingrained in our profess and ingrained

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>in our language. So for example, I think, you know,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 2>we use language which kind of puts a patient at

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>a distance and has kind of innate skepticism in it. So,

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>for example, some of the medical language, we may use

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>terms like the patient denied or the patient claimed, so

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of inherently skeptic of the patient, or it

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 2>might be derogatory language. So there's a term that we

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>use here in the UK. I'm not sure if you

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>guys use it in the US, but what we call

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a heart sink patient, so someone when we see them,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we know, oh, gosh, this is going to be a

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 2>difficult consultation, and we can sometimes use language that is

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>victim blaming and language that is paternalistic. So I work

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in HIV medicine where we really want patients to take

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>their tablets every day. It's very important, but we talk

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>about patient compliance and you know that sounds like a

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>very paternalistic attitude to patients. It's not a very patient

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>focused language. So I think it really is inherent in it.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is there is a lot of

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 2>use to humanizing language. So again from my specialty of HIV,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can see people saying things like the

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>HIV patient, but there's been a real shift to talking

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 2>about people living with HIV, so being person focused first.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>If the problem of silencing patients begins during medical training,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and also like hundreds of years in the making, it

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is only exacerbated by the way modern medicine is practiced,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>where the emphasis tends to be on maximizing productivity. In

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what ways does the medical system hinder or even discourage

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>physicians from adequately listening to their patients.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So I think you're really right when you talk about

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>that emphasis on productivity. So it's you know, numbers of patiency,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>number of tests done, number of diagnoses, number of treatments.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, we get paid on that.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And really what isn't valued are those consultations where listening

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>in itself is therapeutic. So you know, we're not going

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 2>to get paid for just you know, listening to a

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>patient who is having a hard time and at the

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>end of the consultation leaves feeling better because they feel

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>like someone has hurt them. So that just isn't valued

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 2>by our medical systems. You don't get money for that.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>And because there is an emphasis on productivity, it means

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 2>that we are often short of time, so we often

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>too busy to listen. Well, we're looking at our watches,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>were needing to go on to the next patient. We

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 2>work in environments that aren't very good for listening, so

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>for example, we work with very clinical rooms, so it

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>may not feel like a welcoming or comforting space, or

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>they may not be privacy where people feel that they

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>can talk. And I think with the emphasis on being

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>more productive, and I think, particularly since the pandemic, I

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 2>think healthcare workers are increasingly tired, stressed, burnt out, and

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>those are all conditions which mean that we listen not

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 2>as well as we could do.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And I really loved, like I said, how you provided

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this perspective from the physicians as well. And so in

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>these scenarios in your book, you describe someone who is

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>seeking medical care, and then you kind of give the

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from both different healthcare providers associated with the patient

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and the patient themselves. What might be going through their head,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what might they be feeling? And I think that these

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>scenarios help to illustrate the nuance in these interactions where

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there might be doubt, sometimes disbelief, sometimes neglect, and

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes simple just miscommunication or just like forgetfulness, but all

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things tend to end up with more or

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>less the same result in terms of harm or in

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of lack of care. Do you feel that the

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>distinction between an unwillingness to listen and not having the

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>capacity to listen due to things like you mentioned compassion fatigue.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Do you think making that distinction is important, like is

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>one more easily addressed than the other.

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really good question, and you're right,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 2>they lead to the same thing. I think that most

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 2>healthcare providers, most doctors do want to listen. I think

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 2>we kind of go into the field because we're you know,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>people who are we're caring people. We want to make

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 2>people feel better. So I think generally for most people

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 2>there is a willingness to listen, and often it is

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>our training or the environments that we're working in, which

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 2>means that.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>It's harder for us to do so.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 2>But I do think there is an unwillingness to listen sometimes,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 2>so as I've said, you know, when we're uncomfortable hearing

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 2>what the patient is saying because we don't know what

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to do, or when things are uncertain so again we're

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 2>not entirely sure what is the next step to take.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 2>I think that's when we shut patients down. So I

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>think there is that unwillingness to listen. But again I

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>think that comes from how we're trained to be someone

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>who is a fixer rather than someone who is a

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 2>healer and can just listen. So I think whether it's

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>unwillingness or not having the capacity to listen, I think

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>both involve system change, and they're both really important.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's take another quick break. We'll be back before you

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>know it. Welcome back, everyone. I'm here chatting with doctor

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Ragashri Darawan about her book Unheard. Let's jump back into

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>some questions, getting into some of those changes that we

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could make. I loved how in your book you had

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of chapters here are ways that we

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>can change things at different levels of organization, at an

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>individual level, training and so on, And I was wondering

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>if you could speak to that a little bit more.

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to medical training, how can we fix

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this from the ground up, or how can individual providers

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of reassess their own listening skills or maybe where

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they could improve.

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's things for individuals to do, and

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there's things for system change, which starts from

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 2>medical training and education all the way to kind of

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>how institutions are run and kind of post qualification training.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think as individuals, I think it's really important

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>that we learn to reflect on our listening and certainly

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>since writing the book, that's something I've been doing a

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 2>lot more of a thinking, you know, why was that

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>consultation difficult? Like what happened in it that might have

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 2>made it difficult for me to really listen to what

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 2>the person was saying. Being aware obviously that you know,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we all hold bias, and thinking about when that's most

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>likely to come up, so you know, we're more likely

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 2>to rely on stereotypes and what I call heuristics, so

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 2>mental shortcuts when we're tired or stressed. So you know,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>for example, you may not be so good at listening,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>or you may be more biased when it's three o'clock

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, you're in the emergency department and it's

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 2>really busy. So I think individual reflection is important, but

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I think listening should be taught at university, right from

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 2>medical school, so how we can be better listeners, And

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 2>also really taking that emphasis away from thinking all patients

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>present in a certain way. Patients may not present in

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 2>a way that we necessarily expect them to, and not

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>using that as kind of excuse not to believe them

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 2>or to feel that we're skeptical of them. Understanding that

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>people present diversity, people are diverse. I think there's also

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>something there around being taught about the value of listening

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and that listening in itself can be therapeutic, so really

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>taking us away from that kind of fixer model of

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>being doctors to being healers again. And I think also

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>really important in medical school is learning more about the

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 2>social determinants of health, so understanding why people don't present

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>as we expect them to, why they don't behave as

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we expect them to. And understanding more about the history

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 2>of medicine, so you know, understanding about bias, the history

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of medical experimentation, etc. And then when we get into

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of clinic practice, I think there needs to be

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>a room for more reflection in the workforce generally. So

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about how you know there should be planned

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>reflection time, so having team supervision, so in clinical practice

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>often if something bad happens, then the team might reflect.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 2>But building that into kind of everyday practice so teams

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 2>together can talk about their experiences about what went well

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 2>and what didn't I think would be really good for

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone and would help prevent some of that compassion fatigue

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and burnout. And I guess the other things are about

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 2>making better listening environments, so you know, making those private

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>spaces more available, making sure that we have regular breaks

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>so that we can then feel rejuvenated again, more likely

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to listen, and thinking what does productivity mean? Maybe it

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>does mean just listening as being a therapeutic tool.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Getting a bit more into what that reflection looks like.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You discuss in your book how well you as a

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>physician sometimes don't always listen as well as you could.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about what those moments are like? Is

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it something that you realize at the time where you're

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>not being a good listener or did it just like

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like you said, like this was this consultation didn't

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>feel great or didn't something was not right about it?

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Or was it in retrospect that you're seeing this or

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is it a combination of both.

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a combination of both.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>So sometimes you know, when you're you know, for example,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>in a busy clinic and you're rushing and you're trying

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>you're on the computer trying to order tests while also

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>listen to the patient, you're trying to make notes, or

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, someone pops in to tell you something, or

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>an email pops up on your computer. You know that

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you are distracted and you know that you're perhaps not

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 2>listening or focusing as well as you can be. And

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously doctors a human you may have not

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>had a good night's sleep before, you might be tired

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and know that you're not at your best, or you

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>know something's happening in your personal life. So I think

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 2>you can be aware of that at the time, but

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you're not so aware. So it may be kind

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of towards the end of the consultation when you're just like, oh,

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you know that didn't feel right as you said, or

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>you know that was an uncomfortable consultation. I don't feel like,

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the patient got what they wanted and I

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>got what I wanted from the consultation. But I think

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you don't even realize, and I think that can

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>happen to any doctor, but it is, you know, sometimes

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you think you've done your best, but the patient doesn't

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 2>agree for you. So I think trying to recognize when

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you know you're not listening, trying to reflect on those

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>consultations which are uncomfortable, but then also kind of learning

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>from patient feedback as well, and I think feedback is

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>really important from colleagues and patients throughout our career to

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 2>make sure you know, we understand how well we are

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>communicating and listening.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Patients who are unheard by their providers are often or

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes told that they should better advocate for themselves, which,

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, is a form of victim blaming

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because it shifts the responsibility for the signalancing of patients

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to the patients themselves, and it enables the medical community

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to just keep things as they are or it doesn't

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really drive any sort of change. But until the medical

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>institution takes meaningful steps to ensure better listening, what are

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the ways that people can increase the chances

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that they will be heard or listened to by their

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>healthcare providers.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is exactly why I wrote the book because

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I wanted the healthcare system to change. But absolutely, I

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>mean it's not going to change quickly, and I think

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>it's really important that everyone has the agency to try

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and get what they need from the healthcare service. So

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I do provide some tips. So if you are going

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>in for a consultation with a doctor, I think it's

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>really important to be prepared. If you're prepared, perhaps if

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 2>you know a little bit about your condition, or you

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 2>know what questions you want to ask. So, for example,

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I always love it when my patients write a list,

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>so they come in with their list already thought about

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and then we sit and go through each point like

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, that's great. You know, so you feel like

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.239
<v Speaker 2>you've asked everything that you want to. But importantly, it

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 2>makes a doctor feel that you care about what's going on.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 2>It makes you seem more credible. So I definitely recommend

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 2>planning for your consultation. You can always write things down

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>while you're there as well, and I think if you're

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 2>writing things down that you don't understand, then ask the

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 2>doctor what it means. I think sometimes with this innate

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 2>power imbalance between doctors and patients, it can feel scary

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to ask things. So I always say, if you want to,

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>you should take someone with you, like a friend or

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a relative who can advocate for you. And if you do, again,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>prepare them so they know what you want answers to.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So if you don't get a chance to ask the

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>questions yourself, then they can ask it for you and

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they can stick up for you as well. I think

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>if you can, if you would find it helpful to

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>see the same doctor then ask. I think seeing someone

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>who knows you and you know you've already had a

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>good consultation with would be really helpful. So continuity of care,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important, and you can ask for it

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 2>often and if it doesn't go well, I think it's

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>really important to know your rights, so kind of know

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>who's in charge of your care, where you can complain to,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and that you can get a second opinion, and that

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you can ask for it.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really important.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And also I think another thing about being prepared is

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>just letting before your appointment, letting them know if you

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 2>have any special communication needs, so if you need an

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>interpreter or something like that, then that's really helpful to

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the doctor as well.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Other things.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Please bring any medications you're on. It's really helpful to

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 2>know exactly what you're taking. If you're seeing other doctors

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and you have results and things, bring all of that

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 2>with you. It's really nice for us to see it.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And I do write in the book, but sadly, I

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>think lots of studies show that doctors find patients more

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 2>credible if they are you know, if they can be

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 2>if they can appear more well dressed, And I think

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a terrible thing, but it does improve credibility. And

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, I talk in the book about my mother,

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 2>who is a who's a retired family doctor, but she's

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>also you know, an older Indian woman, and stereotypes about

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 2>them is that you know that they often complain about

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>things that are all in their head, and she actually

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 2>gets dressed up to go to her doctor appointments, and

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't think that should happen at all,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 2>but there are lots of studies to show that people

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 2>do it and it can help them come across as

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>more credible. So I'm not really saying that as a tip,

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>but I think people should be aware of it. And

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously there's times when you can't be, so you know,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's an emergency, you know that's not going to happen.

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 2>So I kind of give all these tips of the

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 2>huge caveat, but it is not down to the patients

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>who have to kind of speak up to be heard.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>We should be listening more, but in an imperfect healthcare system,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 2>these are things that you can do.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as you discuss, it's not just patients

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that face issues with being unheard. Can you talk about

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>testimony injustice, in credibility deficit, and how this affects minoritized

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doctors as well.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we've talked about testimonial injustice with regards to patients,

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, minoritized doctors and researchers go unheard. So there

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is a good example of how it can happen. I

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>write it in the book. So imagine you're in like

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a work meeting and you're having a discussion in a

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 2>group and you say something, and you know, you think

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you've made this amazing point and you say it and

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of waiting for everyone to go, yeah, that's

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a great point, but no one says anything, and the

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 2>discussion kind of moves on, and then like a few

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 2>minutes later, someone else makes exactly the same point as you,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and they get praised for it. And you know, that's

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 2>definitely happened to me in meetings may have happened to

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>you as well. So what you have experienced there is

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>testimonial injustice, and I think that can happen to anybody.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think if it happens repeatedly to people, then

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 2>you're just more likely to not speak up because you

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>think no one's really listening to me. So why bother

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>and what this can do in terms of career prospects

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>for minoritized doctors mean that they lose their self confidence.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, they feel less likely to speak up because

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 2>they won't be heard. That means they won't apply for

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, promotions or posts on boards, and this can

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>have a real impact in terms of their career progression.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And it can make them feel kind of excluded from

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the workforce. And I think it's really important that minoritized

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 2>doctors get listened to one to have a diverse workforce,

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's good for patients as well. So yeah, I

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 2>have a whole chapter about how minoritized doctors go unheard

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and the effect it can have on patients.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that you have a whole chapter on it,

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but can you dive into that a little bit and

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>give us some examples of how a more diverse medical

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>workforce can improve patient health.

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's actually quite a lot of research to show this,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 2>And if you're listening, you know, it may be something

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 2>that you've experienced yourself. So you know, it may be

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>easier to talk to a doctor perhaps who looks like

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 2>you or comes from a similar social background to you.

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 2>You may feel kind of more comfortable with them. But

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 2>in terms of research, there's lots to show that a

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 2>more diverse workforce is better for diverse patients.

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 3>So there is a study that I quote, for.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Example, which is from the US in twenty twenty three,

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 2>which showed that in counties with more black primary care doctors,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 2>black people had longer life expectancy and lower mortality rates.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 2>And that is absolutely huge. Isn't it to show that

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 2>having more black doctors means that black patients do better.

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So there's lots of different research studies which show this,

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 2>so it can have a real impact on patient care.

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 2>And if you think, you know minoritize doctors who aren't heard,

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>they're not able to stick up for their patients, so

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 2>their patients then suffer. So it's really important that we

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 2>keep the workforce diverse and also acknowledge that some patients

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 2>also may not want doctors that look like them. And

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I think about this in sexual health a lot, where

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you know, some of our patients don't want to

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 2>see someone who looks like they're from their community because

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>they're worried about confidentiality. So if you've got a diverse workforce,

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you can give patient choice as well, and I think,

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, patients have the experience of seeing lots of

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>different doctors, some of who may suit them, some who

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>may not.

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>As you kind of alluded to, research or knowledge gaps,

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to conditions that predominantly affect minoritized groups,

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>take a long time to fill in. What are some

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the factors contributing to these research gaps, from funding

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to structural barriers, and how do these gaps impact care.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.879
<v Speaker 2>A really good example of this is endometriosis, in that

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a condition which until quite recently, we didn't

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>know that much about, despite affecting one in ten cisgender

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>women around around the world. So this is, you know,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>women have complained of symptoms of endometriosis for centuries, but

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 2>because doctors have been male, their symptoms have not been

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>taken seriously, and because of that, the research hasn't been done,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>leaving us with this big research gap, which means that

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>we still don't know what causes endometriosis, what are the

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>best ways to treat it, how we can help someone

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 2>get pregnant if they have endometriosis, even though there's been

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of push to change this in recent years,

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's probably because we have more more

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 2>female doctors and researchers. When we look at funding levels,

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>we still see that funding, for example, for menstrual conditions

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.959
<v Speaker 2>is much lower compared to conditions that affect mostly men.

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 2>So we still see these real kind of disparities in

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 2>funding for patient groups who are less heard. I talked

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 2>about kind of you know, testimonial injustice with regards to

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 2>minoritized doctors, but we see it in research as well.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 2>So minoritize researchers are more likely to study conditions that

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>affect minoritized patients. And when they're not heard, you know,

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they may not get jobs, they may not get promotions, grants,

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 2>they may not get their research published or cited. All

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 2>those things affect their career progression and mean that their

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 2>research is less likely to be done, which means that

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.479
<v Speaker 2>the conditions that affect minoritize patient groups are less likely

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to be researched and studied. So you know, we have

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>that gap. And if you think of that on a

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 2>really wider scale, if we think kind of when we

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 2>look at global health, we know that global north researchers

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>are much more likely to be seen as credible researchers

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and they get all the grants and all the funding,

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>leaving Global South researchers going unheard as well as the

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 2>communities that they serve when it comes to research.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm so glad that you brought up global health

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because I wanted to ask about sort of the imperialist

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and colonialist roots of global health and how those have

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>left traces in the way that this field is practiced today,

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or the topics and approaches that are prioritized in research.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering if you could just talk a

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about that.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:04.959
<v Speaker 3>So I think I think.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There's been lots of discussion in global health recently about

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 2>how its origins kind of come from disease control during

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 2>colonial times and the approaches then still exist to this day.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:16.959
<v Speaker 3>So there is this.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Kind of feeling of, you know, knowledge that comes from

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the global North, so the countries that colonized other countries

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 2>is superior. So you know, when it came to colonization,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't just about taking land. It was also about

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 2>erasing local knowledge and culture, and that included medicine. So

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Western medicine was part of colonialism. So replacing local health

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>knowledge with Western medicine, and I think global health has

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 2>continued to do this. So I think there is a

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 2>critique at the moment saying that we do need to

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>decolonize global health. We need to value the local knowledge

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 2>of researchers in the global South and understand that they

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 2>are just as credit as researchers in the global North,

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and if not more credible when it comes to conditions

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that affect their communities. So there needs to be more

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 2>power sharing. So power needs to go from researchers in

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the global North to the South. And one of the

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 2>critiques of kind of the history of global health has

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 2>been around how organizations in the global North have kind

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of enacted policies on communities in the global South that

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>have been colonized without really collaborating with them and without

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 2>understanding that perhaps they're order is knowledge of how to

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 2>treat some diseases, but you know that has been devalued

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes erased.

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I pulled a quote from in my notes from your

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>book where you state that global health continues to see

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>local people as being part of the problem, not the solution,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that was like, yes, that is

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly what is always happening, and really is I think

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, like just like with medical training, just like

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>anything where the change has to start from the beginning.

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>It's like going to just take so much time and

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>effort to correct and to fix things and to progress

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and in a better way than we are currently doing.

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think throughout the book, I think one

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of the main themes is it's about power and people

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>who hold the power, be that doctors, be that researchers

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in the global North are going to have to give

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 2>up some of that power, and that, I think is

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 2>I think that's going to be the issue, but they

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 2>need to we need to understand that it means that

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it's better for everyone overall if power sharing occurs.

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the physician patient relationship, I want to

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit about the problem of objectivity and the

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>divide between symptoms and signs. How is evidence ranked in medicine,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and where does patient voice or experience fit in among

0:43:58.000 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>those ranks.

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think we're talking about the hierarchy of evidence

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>quite early on in our medical careers because we've kind

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of taught how to read research papers and to understand

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 2>them and critique them. So at the top of the

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 2>hierarchy are things like meta analyzes, systematic reviews, and then

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 2>we see randomized control trials, and then things like case

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 2>control studies, cohort studies, and then lower down are things

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 2>like case series and expert opinion and animal studies. And

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>essentially what the hierarchy is doing is the ones at

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 2>the top are those that are study designs which have

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 2>less biased and are seen to be more objective. And essentially,

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to research evidence, we value quantitative evidence

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 2>much more highly. So you know, we value numbers and

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 2>statistics because we think they are more objective. So obviously

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that kind of research has been really important and has

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 2>improved patient care, so I'm not arguing against it. Evidence

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 2>based care is a really really important thing which has

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 2>improved patient care massively. But sometimes research questions aren't best

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 2>answered by quantitative study designs. So you know, they're very

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 2>good for asking how many or how much or is

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 2>there a relationship between two things, But sometimes we need

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to understand how or why something happens, So other forms

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of evidence, like for example, qualitative evidence, may be useful,

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's really not as valued as highly as quantitative evidence.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's really interesting about the hierarchy of

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 2>medicine is that there is no patient voice in any

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 2>of that. It's all thinking really about numbers and qualitative

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>evidence isn't valued, and that does include some patient voice.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's really striking to me how we

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 2>value evidence which doesn't come from patients because we see

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 2>it as being too subjective. So I think that has

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 2>again an impact on how well we listen to patients.

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is going a bit back to like the

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>research gap discussion that we were, but I wanted to

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the table that you created for the

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>most and least prestigious diseases. I found that really fascinating

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and truly eye opening. So could you just take me

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>briefly through the characteristics of prestigious diseases and patients and

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not prestigious diseases and patients.

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this concept and this table came from research

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>papers by Norwegian researchers. So yeah, I've just compiled it

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>into a table to make it easier to read. But

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 2>essentially it looks at how doctors look at diseases and

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 2>value them and in turn value the patients who have

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.280
<v Speaker 2>those diseases. So things that might be more prestigious, for example,

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 2>are conditions that have objective features, so you know, easy

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>to see clinical signs or symptoms or test results. So

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 2>for example, if you have HIV, you will have a

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 2>positive HIV antibody test, so that is easy to test for.

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Other things that make disease seem more prestigious or valuable,

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 2>for example, is if it's sudden or life threatening, if

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it affects patients who are young, for example, if the

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:16.240
<v Speaker 2>treatment is kind of active, a bit risky, but means

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that you can cure somebody. And also I think really

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:23.839
<v Speaker 2>interestingly the researchers say here in terms of patients, if

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the patient is more likely to listen to the doctor

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and accept what they say, those diseases in which the

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 2>patient is more likely to do that are more prestigious.

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 2>So when they ask Norwegian doctors over twenty five years

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to rank diseases by their prestige and kind of consistently

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 2>over that time, they found the conditions like leukemia, heart attacks,

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 2>and brain tumors to be the most prestigious diseases. So

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 2>you can see those are ones of objective features that

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 2>are life threatening and you need quite intensive treatment for it,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 2>whereas the diseases that are seen as less prestigious. Those

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 2>are kind of the opposite. So there are fewer objective

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 2>signs of symptoms, so you may have to rely, for example,

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 2>more on patient testimony. There may be things in which

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 2>there isn't an obvious cure or treatment, and there may

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 2>be things in which the patient may have more to say,

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they may be more likely to contest what

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the doctor says, and consistently over the twenty five years

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>in this study. In this Norwegian study, fibromyalgia was found

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to be kind of the least prestigious disease, and I

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>think we also see that with other conditions such as,

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 2>for example, long COVID or MACFS. So these are again

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 2>conditions which we can't just fix, which is not so

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 2>easy to diagnose without patient testimony. So these are the

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 2>conditions that doctors value less find less prestigious, and I

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 2>think that really affects the patients you have them.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious to know sort of what reception or

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>what sort of reactions that you have gotten from other physicians.

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that most people in the medical field

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are receptive to the idea that medical practitioners aren't always

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>good listeners and that they don't always provide adequate care

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>or has there been any defensiveness or I don't know,

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>like just denial outright or is it mostly like yes,

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand and I can see that in myself.

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 2>So I think actually people have been very receptive, which

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 2>has been really encouraging, and it's really interesting. I mean,

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:28.399
<v Speaker 2>it does tend to be the people who have been

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 2>patients themselves and have it been at kind of that

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 2>end of being a patient and not being listened to,

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think, particularly for doctors, when that happens to

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you kind of makes you question everything. So people have

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 2>been very receptive. And the other thing is, you know,

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 2>all doctors at some point will probably be patients as

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 2>they get older. So knowing that we will be on

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the other side ourselves at some point means that you know,

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 2>we will be more receptive to it. And the other

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 2>thing is there's so much evidence to show that patients

0:49:57.520 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 2>say they go unheard. I don't think, you know, we

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 2>can deny data at all. So people have been really receptive,

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and many of them have experienced it themselves as patients.

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:08.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think what is going to be interesting about

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the reaction to this book is the fact that I

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 2>believe it is ingrained in our profession. I think many

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 2>doctors will say, yes, we're not very good at listening

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 2>because we work in environments that make it very hard

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to listen. But I think it'll be interesting to see

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 2>what they think when I say, I think it's actually

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 2>ingrained in our profession.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Right from the beginning.

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned earlier in our discussion that working on this

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.839
<v Speaker 1>book has changed the way that you approach medicine. Can

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you describe a little bit about what you mean by that,

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>How has your approach changed?

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So when I was writing kind of the book proposal

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:47.479
<v Speaker 2>and the first few chapters, I was very lucky because

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I had taken time away from clinical medicine. I took

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a year out after COVID off the second COVID wave,

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 2>and did a master's full time. So I had a

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 2>year out to study, which was wonderful, and I also

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 2>had time to write the book proposal. So when I

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 2>came back to clinical practice, I was still writing the book,

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, do you know what, I need to.

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Be better at listening? So I'm going to try really hard.

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 2>And after a few months I realized it's really really hard.

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Listening is really hard.

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think what has really changed is that I'm

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 2>so much more reflective than I used to be. I

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 2>also now don't feel as uncomfortable as I used to, Like,

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I understand that if a patient wants to tell me

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 2>about something which I can't actually help them with, it's

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 2>okay for me just to listen because they come out

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 2>of the consultation feeling better, so you know, it's not

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 2>a futile consultation. I am still doing something therapeutic. So

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really made me reflect on every consultation

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 2>and it's really made me value just the benefits of

0:51:49.440 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 2>just listening and how that can help patients.

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Darawan, thank you so very much for taking the

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.359
<v Speaker 1>time to chat with me and for writing this incredible

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>book that I'll say it again, I really think should

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be required reading for anyone going into medicine, and everyone

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>already in medicine, and anyone who has an interest in medicine.

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Basically everyone should go read this book. So go check

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>out our website, this podcast will kill You dot com.

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We're I'll post a link to where you can find

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Unheard the Medical Practice of Silencing, as well as a

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>link to doctor Darrewan's author page. And don't forget. You

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>can check out our website for all sorts of other

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>cool things, including, but not limited to, transcripts, Quarantinian placeber

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reader recipes, show notes and references for all of our episodes,

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>links to merch our bookshop dot Org, affiliate account, our

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Goodreads list, a first hand account form, and music by Bloodmobile.

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which, thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>music for this episode and all.

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Of our episodes.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Leana Squalatchi and Tom Bryfocal for our

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.839
<v Speaker 1>audio mixing. And thanks to you listeners for listening. I

0:53:09.880 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>hope you liked this episode and our loving being part

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of the TPWKY book Club. A special thank you, as

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>always to our fantastic patrons. We appreciate your support so

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so very much. Well, until next time, keep washing those

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>hands