WEBVTT - 2010 Predictions Follow-Up

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>text stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot Com.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as always, just as he was

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, his senior writer, Jonathan Strickland. You all

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>know me, know how I earn a living. I'll catch

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this bird for you, but it ain't gonna be easy.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Bad fish now like going down the pond chasing bluegills

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tommy CODs. This shark swally a hole, little shaken,

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>little tenderizing and down you go. Okay, so wow, I

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, I think we'll figure that out in a minute.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course. You know, if you know the source of

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's quotes, please let us know some of you of them. Yeah,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>some of you have been very good about that. We

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>got one email that that listed I think thirty nine

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the quotes. How much Jonathan loves Tron. Yes, but

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that movie I just quoted from not Tron. Alright, Uh,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this is our this is our annual. Hey, let's see

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>how well we did last year podcast where we we

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about the predictions we made the year before and uh.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>And first of all, we should mention that we're recording

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this podcast at the very beginning of December of two

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, and this is about the predictions we made

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for two thousand ten. Now, the reason why I say

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>that is because some of these wrong answers may still

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>turn right before January, so don't write us in if

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>something happened on December thirty one. Some of them were

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>very clearly wrong, and mine is the most embarrassing. Now

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the list here, Polette, the list oh

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>predictions that the two of us made together. Yeah, this

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was the second time we tried this. We tried this

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at the the end of two thousand eight for two

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine. Yeah, and uh, I remember being much more

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>into it and excited about making predictions because I didn't

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>realize how wrong I was going to be. And so

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan made a ton more predictions for two thousand ten

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>than I did because I didn't want to go out

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on the limb, so I was really conservative. Yeah. Also,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you remember how I graded them last year, yeah, yeah,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the last time I'm giving you the marker. I

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>guess I won't be doing that this year, all right,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna start this up. Because I made a

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>few more predictions than Mr Pillette, We've decided that Mr

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Pellette will read out some of mine and then we

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will comment upon them, and then occasionally I will read

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>out some of his, and then we'll make our way

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>through there, and then we're gonna wrap up by talking

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>about some of the big stories that neither of us predicted. Yes,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because we thought that would be fun. Okay, cool, all right,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get started. So you said, yes, that would be

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the year of the e reader, you know, the devices

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to books, like the Nook or the Kindle. Uh

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that you know, well, you were about to head

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>out to see SUH the the show formerly known specifically

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as the Consumer Electronic Show. Every everyone assumes now that

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just ce S. I guess. But you said you'd

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of those when you went out in

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>January to Las Vegas, and you did. Some of them

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have disappeared since then, never actually hit the marketing, some

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of them never really got a good chance. Yeah, I

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>said that that Twain ten would be the year the

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>e reader, and you disagreed. You said that it would

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>take another year. Well, I was going by you know,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the analyst Gartner said that the e reader wasn't yet

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ready for the masses. I think the Kindle sales prove

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that wrong. However, I'm gonna I'm gonna call this one

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a tie for us because one, it really is not

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States at any rate. It's still pretty

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>much a two horse race, right, And and the first

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>horse is the Kindle, and it's way the heck ahead

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the second horse, which is the Nook. And still

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have other readers, but those are the two main ones.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's if you're going strictly by devices dedicated to readers, right,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>because the iPad has become a real contender in the

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>e reader space. But the iPad, of course is not

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just an e reader, so that you know. But I

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>would say that the iPad still has not um It

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>hasn't made e readers obsolete. No, some people said that

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it would because it can do so much more. But

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that some people just like the e

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>reader form factor specifically for reading books. Plus the prices

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>come down, and there was another factor by a very

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>famous woman who came out in favor of e readers,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who probably tilted the market a little bit more than

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it might not have benefit had been allowed to sit

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of anonymous people reading books. Are you

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about Wait wait wait wait, are you talking about

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Kimman? Wait wait wait wait? Are you talking about

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>um Red Fraggle? Yes? Not Oprah. As a matter of fact,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about the lady who has the network

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>starting January one. In January, Sorry, I can remember. I

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>think eleven, isn't it? I don't know. You want to

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go back on that. Yes, it was indeed Oprah I

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was speaking of with the the new network on Discovery. Yeah,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, Oprah. Really the kindle became one of

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>her favorite things, right, Yeah, and of course she she

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>has a bully pulpit in her show, so we're so.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, as soon as she mentioned that, a lot

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of people who may not necessarily have been interested, you know,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>checked it out and discovered they liked it. Yeah. Actually,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that was one of those devices that that quickly got

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>outside that niche market of the you know, the the

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>early adopter tech guys gals, and hit a broader audience

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly and and they still have been doing pretty well.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still calling it a tie. I still don't think

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was really technically the year of the e reader. I

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think the iPad managed to two deflect that quite a bit.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So um, but it certainly did hit public mass consciousness. Yes,

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>readers did really well, and they continued to do well

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>during Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales as well. Okay,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so let's go. I guess to another one of mine.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and one of your on the iPad, the

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch camera. Hey look at that ding? Yeah, I

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>got one right? Um, that was it was almost I

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think I said last year that that one was pretty

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 1>much gimme. Uh. And even though Apple had not said

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>anything to that effect, I could not imagine another year

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>going by of iPod updates and not seeing a camera

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in the new iPod Touch and uh. And of course

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they've They've added the capability of being able to join

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>face time using iPod Touch over WiFi, just like if

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>people who use the iPhone. So I got one, right,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you got one right? More. I think this would be

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a good time for my first one. All right, So

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple release something likely. I love that you said something

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about hedging your bets. I told you I was

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>being really conservative because it could have released like doves

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and it would have been right. They released a plague

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of locusts in the in the Google headquarters and it

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>would have okay. Anyway, so Pletts says Apple will release something,

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the master prognosticator here. But then he went

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on to say it would likely be a tablet and

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it would sell well, but not as well as all

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the hype leading up to the tablet would have indicated.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you remember lots of hype, right, well, yeah,

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>if you remember this time, well, this time, I don't

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>know when you're listening to this, If you remember the

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>winter of two thousand and nine, that was really when

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>people were speculating about this tablet device more than ever before,

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and that that speculation had started years earlier. I mean

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking like, I think it had been like two

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>years since people had started talking about an Apple tablet

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh and so yeah, everyone was was really convinced

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is going to come out with this. Um.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I should also say that I made a similar prediction,

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>except I said that Apple would come out with a

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>tablet and that it would tank. I think we both

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>technically got this a little wrong. I got it. I

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>got it way wrong. I was completely wrong. I mean,

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>apart from the fact that they came out with a tablet,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that part was right. Did you all hear that it

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just me? I know, yes, Okay, Once in a

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>while I say things that don't turn out to be

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>true because, like John teethor I traveled back from an

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>alternate future where the iPad flocked. That's my defense. I

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's three degrees of difference from my reality. I

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>hope you I hope you guys listened to the j

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>T podcast anyway. So, yeah, I said it was gonna flop.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I was totally wrong. Chris said it was gonna sell well,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but not as well as people thought. Actually ended up selling.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sell better hot cakes. Yeah it was.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It flew off store shelves well. Keeping in mind that

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the previous tablets, the Windows based tablets, which were essentially

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>laptop computers that the screen flipped around. Yeah, uh, they

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't really do so well. So I kind of figured,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, they they'll probably do well, but nobody

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really wants to tablet as much as they say we do.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Once it turns out Chris and I totally underestimated how

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple can convince us to buy stuff. In fact, I

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>will go so far as to say fifty of the

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people in this room have an iPad right now. Of

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the people in this room at the moment caved within

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a week of the release, and it's still upset. Actually,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I should I should amend that people in this recording

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>area of this room, because we have our producer out

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there and I don't. Hey, Matt, do you have an iPad?

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt does not. So the people in this room own

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>an iPad? How do you like them? Odds? So, yeah,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Anyway did really, really well. So we both got that

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>kriska just a little wrong. But I'm going to give

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>him a checkmark on this because he was more more

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>right than not right. I was totally wrong. Alright, So

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's your turn to read another one of my predictions. Yes,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>here's another one we got that you got mostly right,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, Anyway will come and go without an

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>announcement of a new console from Sony or Microsoft. But

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo might come out with something, and I agreed with you.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought that would be likely. Yeah, I thought at

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the time that Nintendo might announce a successor possibly to

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Wei. As it turns out, Nintendo did not do that.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo or hasn't so far. December. We still have December

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yeah, this isn't the time for announcements like

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that because people don't want to cannibalize the today sales.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna keep mom on it even I'm sure they're all.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with my earlier self when I said that

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're working on the next All of them

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>are working on the next generation. They're just ready to

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>share with us what they're doing. Yeah, and and and

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>my reasoning behind that was that both Sony and Microsoft

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>were coming out with new peripherals and that would be

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the move and the connect um and uh and I thought, well,

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing that, you wouldn't want to cannibalize those

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sales by suggesting that you were going to come out

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with a new console the following year, because people might say, well,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>what if the peripherals aren't compatible with the new console.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, I was I was right. Sony and

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft did not announce anything. Nintendo did announce the three DS,

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a new gaming device, but it's not a console.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a handheld. It is an interesting handheld device, and

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a variation on an original on their Earth.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm more right than not with this one,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>but I think, uh, yeah, it's not a it's not

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a total win on this one either. Yeah, the tech

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>industry is kind of aren't to pin down on. Yeah, alright,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>hit me with another one. We have one of these

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>science more science e This is before we had a

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>science oriented podcast. So we actually talked about the Large

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, which is the if you'll remember, the Large

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Particle Accelerator in Europe, Europe, Europe. There we go. Uh,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and you said it would either uncover evidence of the

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson particle or something even weirder. Yeah, that has

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not really come to pass. Although recently the LHC has

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>managed to recreate on a miniscule scale conditions similar to

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that that we believe existed right after the Big Bang.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty cool, but nothing to the point where

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at least none of the information has trickled out where

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's something brand new that we didn't know, it's something

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't achieved before. But it's not like we

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have new information that either confirms our hypotheses or uh

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>disproves them, and now we have to come up with

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a new model. So right, so nothing as drumatic as that,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, can I read another one of yours? Now? Okay,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>so Chris, here's another one of yours. The Nexus one

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>will come out and be a consumer device and will

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be exclusive to T Mobile. And I agreed with that.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>The Nexus one phone, uh, Android phone did come out

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>through both Google and through T Mobile. Uh, it was

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a consumer device. Um, it wasn't technically exclusive to T Mobile,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but there was no real easy way to use it

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on other networks if you were just purchasing for yourself.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>They did sell that well, the Google the phone you

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>could get from Google was unlocked GSM phone, so you could,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, use it with a T and T here

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. That would mean you'd have to

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>shave down the simcard though, right or no? The SIM

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>cards on a T and T are different, our size,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>differently from the ones on T Mobile. So that was

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the that was the plan. I'm sorry I misspoke then, No, no, no, no,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think but they were unlocked. Yeah, they were unlocked

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and so um, but you didn't have to buy a

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>contract with mobile to exactly. Yeah, you could use this

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on an existing contract if you already had one with

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile, you didn't have to sign a new contract. Um,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I will. I'm gonna say that this is a win

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>for you. Um. Now. Granted, the next one did not

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>remain a consumer device for all of two thousand and ten,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it did go off the market eventually. Yeah, it actually,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it actually left the market pretty quickly all things considered. Yeah,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those things where I think Google

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>discovered that trying to sell a device through their own

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>system just didn't work as well. For one thing, it

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't allow consumers the chance to get a device in

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>their hands and play with it before committing to purchasing

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the device. And uh, and smartphones aren't cheap, so it's

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to say, you know what, I'm just gonna take

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it on faith that this is a good hand set

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and a good operating system, and I'm just gonna buy

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it without getting my hands on it. So um, Yeah,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't stay out for the consumer market for all

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and ten, but I think it's still

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>count and uh, although I have fewer predictions, I think

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it might be a good point time to point out

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that My next one was sort of related, which was

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile's merger with another company, which, man, it's been

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>rumored like every three months, and it was I think

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it was big around this time last year, around the

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the year two thousand nine. But it's just

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as as many times as people have predicted its death.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile is still hanging in there as a separate company. Independent.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we called out survey says you would get

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>an on this one. Yeah, I think you're right, all right,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so why don't you do it? Um? Okay, uh, here's

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>here's a ding on the game show buzzer for you.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll start to see the pay version of Hulu appear

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in hooray it. As a matter of fact, we both

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>had predicted that one. Hooray for both of us. Um, well,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean this was this was one of our more

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>uh easy targets. I would say, well, the low hanging fruit.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was one of those things where it

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was being talked about at in in two thousand nine,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but the question was whether or not Hulu would actually

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>go through with it, because you know, sometimes companies talk

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about potential business models but nothing ever happens of it.

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it did happen. Hulu does have a

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>paid version, Hulu Plus, which has some some benefits and

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>some limitations compared to the free Hulu service. So yeah,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that one was that one we both got right. Hooray,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>let's do another one of mine. All right. You also

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>said that we would see wireless HD components. Okay, never,

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just market Yeah, all right, Okay, so that didn't happen.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This was talking about things like devices like DVD players

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and Blu ray players and cable boxes even that would

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not require you to use a cable to hook up

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>directly to your TV. They would have power cables, but

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would transmit data wirelessly. We're still not there yet.

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact that I've seen such systems at the

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>CSU conference every year since we started going, they still

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have not really hit the market. My guess is it

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>may partially be due to the economy, because people's stuff

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>already works and there I would imagine that the manufacturers

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>are probably thinking, yeah, I'm not sure that people are

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>ready to upgrade. I think it might also be due

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to those guys in the parking lot all holding bats

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and wearing jackets that say Monster Cable on the back.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>You're anyway, that was not me. Um, I predict next

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>year my legs will be broken. Um. You also said

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we'd see the war of the four G technologies take off.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That's wy max and LTE. We're just starting to see

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that come to a head right now. So I I

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>say that's a partial win. I would, but Verizon will

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be At the time we're recording this, Verizon has announced

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be launching its LTE network and

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think thirty eight cities in just a few days.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>So by the time this this publishes, it will already

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have happened. The launch will have happened. Yeah. I have

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar related prediction. Yeah, oh you said, um, on's

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's the next to last one on the next Yeah,

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the first LTE structure will get built out in the

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>United States because there were some in Europe already. And

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Although it's really funny because it wasn't Verizon

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>who did it first, nor was it a T n

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>T or sprint to our T mobile. It was metro

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>PCs who beat everyone to the punch. Where you at? Dog?

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Where am I at? I'm sorry? Yeah, tro PCs is

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>actually I've got friends who use that that that that

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there's subscribers to metro PCs. Yeah. Now they are a

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>much smaller carrier, which probably helps them in building out

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>their LTE network. But uh yeah, one day tuned into

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the Tech News Metro PCs builds out an LTE network

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I'm sorry, what but they did it?

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So they I get a point. My next the next

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for me is a another big win for me, for me,

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>not for them. Ah. Yes, that would be Palm, the

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>formerly independent company. Uh that came out with the Palm

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Pre smartphone. Of course, the Palm pilots for years the

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>handheld digital assistance. You said that they would either go

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out of business or get acquired, and they got acquired,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. I actually now again this was

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that this was not a sure

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>thing when I predicted it, but it was it was

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>something I felt fairly confident about because they were coming

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>out with a new phone. The Pre actually know at

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this point was the Pixie. The Pre had already come out.

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Um at the beginning of nine they showed it c

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>E S CS two thousand nine. It was yeah, everyone

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>went crazy for the Pre. When c S two thousand nine,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't come out until the spring of two thousand nine,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>which was the problem, right, They couldn't capitalize on that buzz,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the Pre just did not sell very well.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>They came out with the Pixie towards the end of

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, but I said that the Pixie was

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not priced at such a point that it would keep

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the company going. I had forgotten and uh, and sure

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>enough I was right. They started to really waiver and

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>then they got acquired. But they were acquired by Hewlett

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Packard and p HP is talking about doing some things

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Palm, the new web OS, the operating system

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Pre and Pixie, talking about using it for

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>tablets or possibly even phones, even though they said at

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one time they weren't interested in doing phones. Then that's

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that kind of flip flops on. Well,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you got a good platform. And apparently,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>from from what I've heard, the web os is a

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent operating system. So there, okay, so let me

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>do one of yours. Apple will embrace music rental and

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or streaming service on iTunes. We are still waiting for this,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but it appears that something along those lines may be coming.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>They the company purchased La La. Yeah, and La La

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was a streaming music service. Yep. And they're building in

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a huge data center in North Carolina. So it may

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be that this is still going to hit. It's just

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's going to hit by the end

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of Yeah, and there are there are a lot of

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>licensing agreements that have to be in place for something

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>like this to happen, and it wouldn't. It's also prevented

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Spotify from launching in the United States. There's licensing agreements exactly.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't surprise me to see this if they do

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>get all their those those problems tucked away. It wouldn't

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise me to see this announced being announced in January,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's usually an Apple announcement sometime in January. Of course,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that might also be the next iPad that we hear about. Yep.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to do another oil skip skip the

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>next one that's on my list, because that's the one

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that I want to save to the end. Okay, we

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>can do that. You mentioned the rise in three D entertainment.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That would be a great day old ding. Yeah, for

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>at least for movies. For TV, it's still pretty slow

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to take off. Although three D televisions are on the

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>market as of the holiday season, and there are three

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>D channels out already. Um, but it's it's still in

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>its earliest days for television. But as far as movies go, Yeah,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it went crazy. Avatar really helped that a lot. Yep,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't uh, it hasn't stalled out, so it's continuing

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to move. It's just moving slowly. So yeah, I think

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a win. Um. Also, you uh you

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>said more virtual machines will be used in the workplace. Yeah,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that one is kind of hard for me to verify.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that many companies actually switched to

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a virtual machine. Uh system. Now, that would be of course,

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>where you don't necessarily have a computer. You might have

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a monitor and a keyboard and you have a vert

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wall of virtual machine that you lug into the it's

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of hosted on a another corporate machine and

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>uh so you don't have your own personal computer. Uh.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>There may be some companies have switched over, but it

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a big movement as far as I can tell,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to call that a miss on my part.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got movie studios will start testing downloadable movie

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>business models, possibly through through the Comcast acquisition of NBC Universal. Well,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition is still pending pending, so that's we'll have

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see if that actually goes through. But

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as the studios testing downloadable movie business models,

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we we can see streaming versions of this all over

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the place. Right, there's Plus, there's Netflix, there are other um,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there are other actual set top devices that are doing this.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I call this a win. Well Netflix, Uh, the Netflix

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>CEO just not terribly long time before we recorded this,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in early December, announced that Netflix is a streaming video

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>company and not a DVD mail company anymore. So it's

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely the way they're they're headed. Well, I only have

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>two more left, so, um, there's one more I have,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think we should save that before right before

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>yours then, so let's go with yours. The newspaper attempt

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to get behind a paywall. That was a big thing

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year. Um, people talking about

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of removing themselves from Google. Uh, you know

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for some companies that have newspapers behind the paywall. Now,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if you access the article through Google instead of going

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>directly to the site, you can read the whole article.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I won't mention any you know, major newspaper names. Rupert

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch may be involved with them, famous business publications owned

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by Yes, but yeah, I mean there there are situations

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>where in which they've said, you know, hey, no free

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>ride if you come to our site, no matter how

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you get there, You're gonna have to pay if you

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>want to read our content. And um, yeah, at the

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>time him, you said that you expected other newspapers and

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>blogs would step in if some of them went behind

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a paywall, and uh, the big, bigger papers would go

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the old business model. Yeah, we haven't seen

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it happen whole sale like that. No, No, I mean

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Telegraph just announced that it's going to be having

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of not a paywall, but it's going to

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>have a paid uh access model of some sort. And

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the details were not available as of the recording of

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but they did specifically say it wasn't going

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a paywall system. Uh. So there are other

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>newspapers that are trying this, but it did not happen

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at the speed at which I imagined. So this one,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this one's is still just a maybe. Yeah. I I

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just thought have a prediction uh for the Predictions podcast

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>based on this, so I'll bring that up when we

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>actually do our predictions. But yeah, I kind of expected

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it to happen with a couple of them have been

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>rumbling around, but they didn't. Actually it was saying go forward.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It moves slower than we thought. So alright, so we're

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>down to the lab the final two. Right, So here's

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>here's Chris Palette's final prediction for which was Jonathan's computer

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>will die before people. I want you to listen carefully

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to this. All right, hang on, that's me hitting the

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>E key and nothing is happening. Still, I still have

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the same computer, and the E key does not work.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The W key does not work, the A key does

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.479
<v Speaker 1>not work, the S key does not work. The tilty

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is still missing in action. I never found the tilty key,

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so I have to actually plug in a supplemental keyboard

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>if I want to type anything on this computer. But

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the key the keyboard is although it is not functioning,

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the computer is well for a given

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>definition of functioning. Yes, so it did not let me

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it this way. I don't have a new one, so

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that one is U for all intents and purposes on

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>this alright, technically that's a technicality, and I still have

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Um that's true. Actually you could if you

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, maybe maybe it will quote unquote slip off

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>my desk before the end of the year, so you

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>uh can I can I read the last one for

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you to Jonathan will appear on This Weekend Tech sometime

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in well, so c E. That's in January. Yeah, that

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>was like two weeks after we recorded my podcast. So

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we recorded the podcast about two weeks later. I went

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to c and as I was there, I was passing

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>by Leo Laporte and he had his This week in

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech live coverage of c e S table up and running,

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and his producer saw me and waived me on and

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>got me on This week in Text live coverage. Now,

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>technically that was not an episode of This Weekend Tech.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>It was, however, on the This Weekend Tech network and

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I was live, so I thought in January, I'm like, oh,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to call us a win. I still

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't been technically on the show This Week in Tech, however,

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I have appeared several times on Tech News Today, which

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of the shows on This Weekend Tech hosted

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by Tom Merritt. So yeah, and I'd like to point

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>out that you have a very nifty cap on. I'm

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>also wearing a This Weekend Tech baseball cap right now.

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I totally wasn't thinking about that, but yes, I am

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>wearing a baseball cap with the Twit logo on it.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's because I got that at CS and not

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>because he is a Twit. No, that that's unrelated but

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>also true. So, yes, you wanted to mention a few

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the stories before we wrap it up, on things

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't hit here. So I I see some

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of those stories that you listed that interrupt him? Sorry, no,

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Uh, but you know some of these things

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the listeners will agree we we wouldn't necessarily

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have hit anyone they were they were not Yeah, they

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>were not on the radar. Yeah yeah there, and and

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they're probably. I'm sure there's some big ones I didn't.

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I did this off the top of my head, so

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I was mostly thinking of the stories that were recent.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there were stories that happened throughout the year

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that anyway. We did not predict Google TV. No, we didn't.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>We didn't predict Google Buzz nor the massive fallout that

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>immediately followed the launch of Google Buzz, because if you

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, some people, probably a lot of people aren't

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>using Google Buzz at all anymore. I do. I still

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>use it, and there's there's been a legal settlement involving

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that too, right, but Google Buzz, if you don't remember,

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of there was a big outcry

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about privacy issues where you could see people who were

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>context of the people you knew and um, and there

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of other issues around it. So we

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't predict that at all, Nor did we predict the

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>other big Google story of about the driverless car program.

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true. Yeah, for a while there it

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>looked like Google is going to be in the news

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>every week. Actually, for a while there, Google was in

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the news every week. Uh, I meant for the rest

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. I wouldn't be surprised if that still

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>holds true. You mentioned Facebook the exactly where all of

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>your messages are going to go through a kind of

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>central funnel on Facebook, So it's kind of like email messaging,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>instant messaging. All that the notes and all that kind

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff all kind of goes through one I don't

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have access to that yet. But we didn't predict that.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We didn't think that. We didn't think about Facebook having

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a what some people had been calling a Gmail killer,

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and even Facebook has said since then that that's not

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what this is intended to be. UM did not predict

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>my spaces redesign, despite the fact that I think they

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had announced it sometime in two thousand nine. Where do

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we predict that they would be partnering with Facebook? I

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think I think maybe gone out of business or something else.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we mostly didn't think about my Space at all.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We did not We didn't think that Windows Phone seven

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to be uh well, we didn't predict that

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Windows Phones seven was really gonna look as awesome as

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it does. You know, Um, I actually got to play

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with Windows Phone seven recently, and uh and I was

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>really impressed with the operating system. I thought for a

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>while I was skeptical that Windows could I know, crazy

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>huh A skeptical that Windows could jump back into the

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>smartphone wars, because I thought that Android and Apple really

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>had that sewn up. But Windows fun seven does look

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's a legitimate contender. I mean it, it's slick,

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it does what it's supposed to do, at least the

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>limited amount of time I've had with it, it did. Um,

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so I would not be surprised to see that actually

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>take off, especially if if Windows partners with some really

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>good handset manufacturers. Uh. We did not predict the iPhone

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for the massive redesign of the iPhone. I mean, we

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't predict that. We didn't predict FaceTime. We did not

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>predict and ten I gait. There was no way we

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can know that we were holding it wrong. I'm left handed,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way. So anyway, UM, we did not predict

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole this was Yeah, this is the story that

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories that drove me crazy in Gizmodo

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and leaking the iPhone four story months before it actually launched,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and not just the leak, but the whole stolen slash

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>missing iPhone for debacle, finding it quote unquote on a

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bar stool and or stealing it depending on who you ask,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and then selling it essentially to Gizmoto and then Gizmodo

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>running the story. Did not predict that. UM didn't predict

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft Kid going on sale, then not being on sale,

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>then being on sale again. We didn't predict the Danger debacle. Either,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Yeah, that's something that came up earlier, the

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Danger servers, and I would not have I would not

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>have imagined that after Microsoft acquired Danger. I mean that

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the kin as kin to uh, the T mobile sidekick, um,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I would not have expected that to have gone

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>away the way it did. But and I also have here,

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we did not predict this one's. This one's the juicy

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>story of the bunch. We did not predict HP CEO

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Heard having to resign from HP due to a scandal, which,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>depending again upon whom you ask, either was about inappropriate

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>relationships or just mismanagement of money or or unreported expenses.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's the nice way of putting it. Uh.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Nor did we predict that that he would then just

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>turn around and become a co president over at Oracle. Yeah,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that was actually a pretty scandalous story all around, because,

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean HP and Oracle. You're talking about two major companies,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about a man who presumably has quite

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of knowledge about one company's I p going

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to work for a competitor, Yes, in a very prominent position, Yes,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as a prominent as it gets as it turns out. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a little freaky. Yeah, we also didn't know I

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it, predict the wiki leaks. That's something that

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, has become very and it's still unfolding as

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we record this podcast. They've been undergoing denial of service attacks.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They switched over to the Amazon Cloud system, and now

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I've just heard before we win in that Amazon has

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pulled that. Yes, they are no longer on Amazon. Yeah,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>they're like, you know what, maybe we don't want to

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>have the target of all these d d o S attacks. Yeah, no,

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't predict that at all. Um. Yeah, there's and

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what we didn't predict could go into another eight episodes.

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's wrap this up because I think we've gone

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>way too long for this one. Yeah, it's it just

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>goes to show you how mercurial I hate that word mercurial.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>The tech world is. Things changed so frequently, and you know,

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we take our our best shots, but we don't always. Yeah.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for us to record the predictions for eleven.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing that during this particular record wording sessions. Yeah. Yeah,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>they should be fun though. All right, So if you

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>guys have any predictions for eleven, that you think are

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely positively going to come true. Email me and that

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>way I can get the advantage over Poulette, or you

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can post to our Facebook or Twitter accounts they handle

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>There is tech Stuff H s W. Our email address

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com and

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I will talk to you again, probably before

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>really soon. For more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it how stuff works dot com. To learn more

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>about the podcast, click on the podcast icon in the

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>upper right corner of our homepage. The how Stuff Works

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>iPhone app has arrived. Download it today on iTunes. Brought

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to you by the reinvented two thousand and twelve Camry.

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you