1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:03,200 Speaker 1: Hello everyone, I'm Matthew Friedman, matt fd Oracle. Welcome to 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: the Betting Pros Podcast, brought to you by bet MGM, 3 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: where you can get a risk free bet of up 4 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: to a thousand dollars with the promo code betty Pros 5 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:11,399 Speaker 1: on first deposit. All right here with me to talk 6 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,680 Speaker 1: NFL Week seventeen Best bets is Cleve Ta, proprietor of 7 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 1: Cleveanalytics dot Com and a contributor to the Hammer Betting Network. 8 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:21,079 Speaker 1: Cleeve thanks for joining the show. 9 00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 2: Hey man, I appreciate you having me on. 10 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, So cleave Ta, what does that stand for? 11 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 3: Well, Cleve is, I'm from this I live in the 12 00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:33,559 Speaker 3: city of Cleveland, a big, big Cleveland sports fan, and 13 00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 3: then Tha is just just some initials. 14 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 2: So it's funny. 15 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 3: When Twitter was created how many years ago, twelve, thirteen 16 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 3: years ago, when Eve been longer that fifteen years ago. 17 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:45,199 Speaker 2: Yeah, no one knew it would end up like this. 18 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 3: So I just needed a quick username, and my buddy 19 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 3: had same. They had Cleve and then he had his 20 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:52,519 Speaker 3: real first name. So I just did that with my 21 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 3: initials and it's been kind of stuck ever since then. 22 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:58,320 Speaker 3: I haven't changed it, so it was just kind of 23 00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:00,080 Speaker 3: on a whim, and so I've just I've stuck with it. 24 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, so part of me figured it was for Cleveland, 25 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: which you know, if you go to to Twitter look 26 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 1: at Cleve's handle, you'll see Cleveland Browns I think in 27 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 1: the header there. So like that seemed rather obvious. But 28 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:13,759 Speaker 1: part of me was also like thinking, okay, like if 29 00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 1: you were to say CLV, like like if you were 30 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 1: to pronounce it, it might be Cleve, you know what 31 00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,240 Speaker 1: I mean. So like I see this, see the L 32 00:01:22,319 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: and the V, and I always think, oh, that like 33 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 1: CLEVE is like it stands for closing line value, even 34 00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,120 Speaker 1: though like I knew it didn't, but just in my brain, 35 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:31,559 Speaker 1: I've always made that association. 36 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 2: That's funny. I've never even thought about that. 37 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 3: But that's not it's not a bad thing, but a 38 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 3: lot of controversy with the CLV, right, so but yeah, no, 39 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:39,839 Speaker 3: that's that's funny. 40 00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 2: I never thought about it, but it could be. 41 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, of course, so you actually at Cleve Analytics, 42 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 1: you have a piece I think looking at CLV, and 43 00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 1: you know, so some people will talk about how CLV 44 00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Some people think that obviously like closing line 45 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,680 Speaker 1: value is the holy grail for people who aren't aware 46 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 1: of what closing line value is. It's the difference between 47 00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 1: the line where you bet it and where the closing 48 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:09,040 Speaker 1: line is. And so if you bet something at plus 49 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: three and it moves to plus one, then you got 50 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 1: two points of closing line value. And so that in 51 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 1: general would feel like a good thing if you were 52 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:22,640 Speaker 1: if you were betting. Of course, if the if the 53 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:25,280 Speaker 1: bat didn't hit, then you would be like, closing line 54 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 1: value doesn't matter where are you on the closing line 55 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: value spectrum in terms of mattering not mattering? What do 56 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: you think? 57 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:35,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I think on. 58 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 3: A kind of one off basis, it probably isn't a 59 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 3: huge deal. I mean, you'd like to get it, but 60 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:41,920 Speaker 3: it doesn't really tell you much. But I think in 61 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:45,240 Speaker 3: the long run, as you kind of accumulate to CLV, 62 00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 3: it's a good I think it's a good way to 63 00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 3: recognize whether you are you're you're a sharp better or 64 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:54,480 Speaker 3: not in my opinion, over over the long run, because 65 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:57,600 Speaker 3: if you're consistently beating a market that is supposedly efficient 66 00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:00,920 Speaker 3: or close to efficient, then you're doing something right. So 67 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 3: I think it's a good sign in that in that regard, 68 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:04,760 Speaker 3: So I think if you look at it from a 69 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:08,240 Speaker 3: long stretch, you want to get as much CLV as possible. 70 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 3: But yeah, from I mean, I think I was on 71 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:12,040 Speaker 3: the Broncos minus two and a half last week. I 72 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:14,239 Speaker 3: think it closed three three and a half. That a 73 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:16,239 Speaker 3: smart bet, you know, I mean, like, so it doesn't 74 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:18,440 Speaker 3: work out and I can I can just tell you 75 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 3: I do a better job probably of predicting where the 76 00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 3: line will close, more so than whether it'll win or not. 77 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 2: And you know, I don't know. 78 00:03:27,560 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 3: Is that at the end of the day, I'm not 79 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 3: sure if that's more valuable, but but yeah, you want 80 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:34,920 Speaker 3: to be ahead of the market as much as possible, 81 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 3: and especially when the sharper betters, with the influential betters 82 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 3: are the one shaping. 83 00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 2: A lot of these lines. 84 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 3: You know, that means you're on the same side of 85 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 3: them and you have a better line than a lot 86 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 3: of them. So at the end of the day, you 87 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:48,000 Speaker 3: want that obviously more often than not. 88 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I was right there with you last week 89 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:54,720 Speaker 1: on on Denver at uh you know, at that number, 90 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:59,280 Speaker 1: and of course that did not that did not feel good. Obviously, 91 00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: that went against us. But yeah, I mean closing line value. 92 00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 1: I think it's as you said, I feel like I'm 93 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 1: better at predicting in some instances where the market will 94 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: go instead of where it should go, you know, where 95 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 1: the line should be, uh, and you know that that 96 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 1: ultimately does have some value there. How's the season gone 97 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 1: for you. 98 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:21,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it's it's been okay. 99 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 3: It's from sides perspective, I'm in kind of the lower 100 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 3: fifty percent range, which is fine. You know historically, you know, 101 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 3: whether it be my personal plays which are typically kind 102 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,920 Speaker 3: of mid fifties, or you know, I've entered these Circle 103 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,160 Speaker 3: Millions contests and the certain Westgate Super Contests for the 104 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,279 Speaker 3: last decade, and I think I'm hitting I've hit sixty 105 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:44,919 Speaker 3: percent plus like three the last four years, so this 106 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:47,680 Speaker 3: is to me, this is a down year, but in general, 107 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:49,680 Speaker 3: you know, it's a positive. And then I've you know, 108 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 3: really started to do a lot more with props this 109 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,240 Speaker 3: year in the regular season. I typically had had kind 110 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 3: of waited more for the playoffs because you know, lines 111 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,000 Speaker 3: are way more efficient and relentless games. But I started 112 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:03,279 Speaker 3: to do a lot more from a prop perspective during 113 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 3: the season, and I'm I'm actually hitting sixty five percent 114 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 3: of props, which is crazy to me. And it's funny 115 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 3: because there's a lot of sharp I mean, there's sharper 116 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 3: money in the market these days, and there are times 117 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:16,480 Speaker 3: where like I'll be on one side and I'll hear, hey, 118 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:18,080 Speaker 3: you know, people will message me, hey, do you know 119 00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 3: so and so, you know, real sharp prop better is 120 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 3: on the other side, and I'm like, okay, and I win, 121 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:25,719 Speaker 3: you know, I'll win by a mile, and it's. 122 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:27,280 Speaker 2: Like, okay, give myself a pat on the back. 123 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:31,120 Speaker 3: I don't know, maybe I'm doing something different, but I've really, really, 124 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 3: I think, just honed in on a couple of props 125 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:39,560 Speaker 3: per per week that really just find I just find good, 126 00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:42,719 Speaker 3: the best possible matchup in my opinion, because I don't 127 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 3: think that the opening lines are really that that sharp. 128 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 3: I mean, you know, you know these sharp openers are 129 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:51,520 Speaker 3: never never really I mean that Taysom Hill number last 130 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,120 Speaker 3: year was the last week was thirty four and a half. 131 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:55,640 Speaker 3: And it's my that was like the dumbest I remember 132 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:57,560 Speaker 3: I was messaging someone said, you know, have you seen 133 00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 3: a taste some prop yet? And I said, it's go 134 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 3: watch it's gonna be in the low thirties and I 135 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 3: can't imagine you know, anyone not betting it, you know, 136 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 3: up to at least forty. And so it opened up 137 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 3: I think thirty four and a half and bet up 138 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:12,960 Speaker 3: to I think it closed it like fifty two or 139 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:14,160 Speaker 3: something crazy. 140 00:06:13,839 --> 00:06:14,240 Speaker 2: Right like that. 141 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, and that was just the most obviously that's something 142 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:19,360 Speaker 3: that you know, the books are not not paying attention 143 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 3: to one off Taysom Hill props, right, They're not putting 144 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,000 Speaker 3: that much effort into it, So you know, you could 145 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:27,280 Speaker 3: take advantage of those kind of those mispricings. 146 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:28,240 Speaker 2: And so I've been able to. 147 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:30,719 Speaker 3: Do that a lot and really have hit hit at 148 00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:32,720 Speaker 3: a really high rate and you know, spread around as 149 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:34,479 Speaker 3: many books as I can, so I don't get limited. 150 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 2: So so far it's doing okay. 151 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:39,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting that you you kind of got into 152 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:42,880 Speaker 1: props after getting into sides and totals. The way I 153 00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:45,960 Speaker 1: got into betting was through fantasy, you know, like I 154 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:48,600 Speaker 1: was really into fantasy, had a full time job in 155 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 1: fantasy sports, and then uh, you know, the company I 156 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: was working for got more into sports betting, and so 157 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 1: I started to get into player props that way, and 158 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 1: then from there moved in to sides and totals, and 159 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 1: I feel like I was a little bit too early 160 00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:10,240 Speaker 1: on the props because the prop market has become much 161 00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:13,160 Speaker 1: more liquid than it was when I was really getting 162 00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 1: into it five years ago, and so I had success, 163 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 1: like quote unquote success then, but you know, like all 164 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: those accounts, they got limited very quickly, and I think 165 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:29,520 Speaker 1: now accounts aren't quite as quick to get limited in 166 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:32,880 Speaker 1: the prop market, and so it's it's just interesting the 167 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: way that people get into betting in the areas where 168 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:38,200 Speaker 1: they gravitate towards Yeah. 169 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:39,840 Speaker 2: And I will say, because I've been doing sides for 170 00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 2: what twenty. 171 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 3: Five years probably at those point, since I was in college, 172 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 3: losing a lot of money when I was in my twenties, 173 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,880 Speaker 3: until I figure things out, and I will say, under 174 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 3: I think the one area with the prop market that 175 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 3: I've understood not just the kind of pure matchup, but 176 00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:58,080 Speaker 3: I think you kind of have to marry understanding you know, 177 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 3: game flow obviously gamescript with the actual matchup, and that's 178 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 3: really important there. And I think some of the you know, 179 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 3: there are some guys that just do props or dfs 180 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 3: and that aren't good at understanding the sides, and so 181 00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:14,200 Speaker 3: they just say, oh, a team is, you know, seven 182 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 3: point favorite, So I'm going to gravitate towards a running 183 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 3: back right because game script. 184 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:20,120 Speaker 2: But if you are, if you you. 185 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 3: Know, are successful betting sides, and I think I am 186 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 3: in general, Like if I think an underdog actually is 187 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:28,600 Speaker 3: live at a at a seven as a seven point underdog, 188 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:31,720 Speaker 3: I'm much more likely to take a look at those 189 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 3: running back markets than others would, So that a little bit. 190 00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:38,760 Speaker 3: So that creates a little bit of value on my end, 191 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 3: so and vice versa. So I think that does help. 192 00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 3: It gives me a tiny little edge here and there, 193 00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:47,440 Speaker 3: just because a lot of the sharp prop guys don't 194 00:08:47,480 --> 00:08:50,320 Speaker 3: do sides, so they don't really are able to evaluate 195 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,840 Speaker 3: it that way. So I can take advantage from that perspective. 196 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:55,520 Speaker 3: So you know, it's a nice little marriage between the two. 197 00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:58,120 Speaker 3: And it's taken me time. And look, I used to 198 00:08:58,120 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 3: do kind of just prime time props and I've gone 199 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 3: through stretches. I mean Twitter probably four five years ago. 200 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 3: I remember I went through stretchers. Was given out like 201 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:08,960 Speaker 3: a one prop per primetime games. I think I won 202 00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,320 Speaker 3: fifteen in a row at the point where like I 203 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 3: would just put up oh. 204 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 2: Like I think it was Sony Michelle was on New 205 00:09:14,520 --> 00:09:16,120 Speaker 2: England as a rookie and I put up a prop. 206 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:17,880 Speaker 2: It was like thirty five at the time. 207 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,560 Speaker 3: And I think within twenty minutes my buddy texted me goes, 208 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:22,719 Speaker 3: that thing is like forty five right now, Like, how 209 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:24,719 Speaker 3: the hell do you move it to that degree? I 210 00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:26,560 Speaker 3: don't know, Like you know, it was so ill liquid, 211 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 3: like you said just five years ago. 212 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:29,800 Speaker 2: Now it's not to that. I don't know they gets 213 00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:30,679 Speaker 2: to that degree. 214 00:09:31,080 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 3: But you know, so I've had some success in the past, 215 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:36,720 Speaker 3: just never really focused on it. Now I'm taking probably 216 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:40,280 Speaker 3: a handful per Sunday, whereas maybe I would only do 217 00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:41,800 Speaker 3: primetime in the past. 218 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, so great conversation there. We are recording 219 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 1: this on Thursday. This morning, I posted my projected spreads 220 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:53,000 Speaker 1: for each game, and one line that caught my eye 221 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 1: was Cardinals plus three and a half at the Falcons. 222 00:09:56,760 --> 00:10:01,200 Speaker 1: And I'm looking at the odds paid now at betting Pros, 223 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:03,439 Speaker 1: the number is still three and a half. Of course, 224 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:05,160 Speaker 1: that number is three and a half at bet Gym, 225 00:10:05,160 --> 00:10:06,640 Speaker 1: where you can get that risk free bet of up 226 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: two thousand dollars with the promo code betting Pros. On 227 00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 1: first deposit. All right, you know, there are some trends 228 00:10:12,040 --> 00:10:14,920 Speaker 1: that you can look at for this game. Cliff Kingsbury 229 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 1: on the road has historically been great underdog. He's been 230 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:21,920 Speaker 1: good as a road dog sixteen, five and two against 231 00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,560 Speaker 1: the spread. And then Arthur Smith, like the Falcons have 232 00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:26,800 Speaker 1: no home field advantage. He's four and ten against the 233 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:29,679 Speaker 1: spread at home, one in four against the spread as 234 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:32,720 Speaker 1: a home favorite, And I'm looking at Desmond Ritter and 235 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: I think, like, Okay, sure the Falcons should be favored 236 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 1: in this matchup, but favored by more than a field 237 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:43,200 Speaker 1: goal that just feels like it's too much. The Falcons 238 00:10:43,280 --> 00:10:45,600 Speaker 1: opened the year six and zero against the spread, three 239 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:47,880 Speaker 1: and three on the money line. You know, they were 240 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 1: an overachieving cover machine to open the year. But since 241 00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:53,760 Speaker 1: then they are two and seven against the spread and 242 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:56,080 Speaker 1: on the money line. The market has caught up to 243 00:10:56,120 --> 00:10:59,440 Speaker 1: the Falcons, and the Falcons have regressed as the season 244 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 1: has per regressed, especially on offense and especially since switching 245 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: to Desmond Ritter. In weeks one through six, they average 246 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,679 Speaker 1: twenty four point three points per game, in weeks seven 247 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:13,679 Speaker 1: through sixteen, eighteen point three points per game, and then 248 00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:16,360 Speaker 1: since they switched to Ritter thirteen and a half points 249 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:18,800 Speaker 1: per game. Now, it's only two games, but the sample 250 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:21,760 Speaker 1: has not been good. He's had the team has had 251 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 1: only four point seven yards per pass attempt with Ritter. 252 00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:27,559 Speaker 1: In weeks one through six, they had six point seven 253 00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:31,560 Speaker 1: yards per pass attempt. Like they've they've really regressed, especially 254 00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,000 Speaker 1: since they switched to Ritter and the Cardinals. They're a 255 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:36,600 Speaker 1: bottom five team like in any one's power ratings, but 256 00:11:36,640 --> 00:11:39,120 Speaker 1: they have a clear edge with Colt McCoy at quarterback. 257 00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:42,679 Speaker 1: He's cleared the concussion protocol. He's playing this week. If 258 00:11:42,679 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: you look at what McCoy has done after the Browns era, 259 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:50,040 Speaker 1: he's had six point four adjusted yards per attempt. In 260 00:11:50,040 --> 00:11:52,080 Speaker 1: his two years with the Cardinals, he's had six point 261 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:56,000 Speaker 1: one adjusted yards per attempt. Like he's a competent veteran backup. 262 00:11:56,240 --> 00:11:58,439 Speaker 1: He's not great, but he's competent. And that's way more 263 00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:00,240 Speaker 1: than we can say for Ritter, who's been I think 264 00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:04,640 Speaker 1: a clear downgrade on Marcus Marioto Again. The Falcons, I 265 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:07,200 Speaker 1: think they should be favored, but not buy more than 266 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:09,360 Speaker 1: fill goal and they're one and two against this bread 267 00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:13,040 Speaker 1: as favorites this year, they're one ats victory as a 268 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 1: favorite was against the Bears in Week eleven when Justin 269 00:12:16,160 --> 00:12:21,400 Speaker 1: Fields suffered his shoulder injury. So not exactly the circumstances 270 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:23,959 Speaker 1: that you would look for. So you know, Raw, I'm 271 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: proven rookie quarterback at home at a home field advantage 272 00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: that doesn't really amount to all that much laying too 273 00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:32,840 Speaker 1: many points. I'm just looking at the Cardinals in this spot, 274 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:35,720 Speaker 1: even though I think the Cardinals are really bad as 275 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 1: a football team. But I this projected at two point 276 00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:41,200 Speaker 1: twenty five. Cleeve, I think you're on this side with me. 277 00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: Cardinals plus three and a half. What do you think? 278 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:46,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I am. I actually took it yesterday three and 279 00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:47,800 Speaker 3: a half and I totally agree. I think this line 280 00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:49,680 Speaker 3: should be at three. I think I'll close at three. 281 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:52,360 Speaker 2: We'll see what happens, but totally agree. 282 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:55,640 Speaker 3: I mean the Colt McCoy from Trace mcsworley cult McCoy, 283 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:57,959 Speaker 3: I mean the market, unless the market had a really 284 00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:00,160 Speaker 3: strong feeling that Colt McCoy's gonna play, maybe they did. 285 00:13:00,600 --> 00:13:02,160 Speaker 3: To go from it was only four to three and 286 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,840 Speaker 3: a half. To me, is just that's way too That's 287 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 3: not enough, I mean to me, I mean mcsorley's fifty 288 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 3: a tho out of fifty two quarterbacks and EPA per play, 289 00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:14,200 Speaker 3: he's dead last and success rate. He's not an NFL quarterback. McCoy, 290 00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:15,680 Speaker 3: like you said, is competent. Now if you look at 291 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,680 Speaker 3: his numbers this year, not as good from an EPA perspective, 292 00:13:18,679 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 3: but you have to consider two of his starts were 293 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 3: against San Francisco in New England New England. Well, New 294 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:25,520 Speaker 3: England wasn't a start, but it was what one or 295 00:13:25,520 --> 00:13:26,920 Speaker 3: two plays in for Tyler. 296 00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:29,199 Speaker 2: That's a top two defenses in the NFL from an. 297 00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:31,959 Speaker 3: EBA perspective, So it's not really fair to judge him 298 00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:34,200 Speaker 3: on that. You're going up against an Atlanta defense, it's 299 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:37,400 Speaker 3: last and success rate. They are last in pressure rate, 300 00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 3: So a bad offensive line doesn't really need to worry about, 301 00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 3: you know, a defense in Atlanta there. 302 00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:44,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, And the. 303 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:46,280 Speaker 3: Only area that I would have been worried about was 304 00:13:46,320 --> 00:13:49,320 Speaker 3: potentially motivation for a team like Arizona. But you know 305 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 3: the fact that JJ Watt is announcing his retirement I 306 00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:53,880 Speaker 3: think helps here because you got to you got a 307 00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:55,960 Speaker 3: defense that really looks up to the guy. They're gonna 308 00:13:55,960 --> 00:13:57,520 Speaker 3: play hard for him. I don't think they're just gonna 309 00:13:57,559 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 3: totally quit in his final two games of his career. 310 00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:00,640 Speaker 2: I find that hard to believe. 311 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:04,120 Speaker 3: Still got weapons on offense with DeAndre Hopkins and James 312 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:06,640 Speaker 3: Connor and you know Hollywood Brown. So it's just, yeah, 313 00:14:06,679 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 3: it's hard for me to see a team, a bad 314 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,080 Speaker 3: team like Atlanta with a rookie quarterback who's done nothing 315 00:14:12,760 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 3: laying over a field goal. I think this definitely closes 316 00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:16,120 Speaker 3: at three some with you here. 317 00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 1: One game, you were looking at Texans minus four on 318 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:24,960 Speaker 1: the road in Jacksonville. And I mean the Texans. I 319 00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:27,320 Speaker 1: mean I had them as the worst team in the 320 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 1: league a few weeks ago, and then they did well 321 00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 1: against the Cowboys, almost beat the Cowboys. They played well 322 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: against the Chiefs, and then outright beat the Titans, and 323 00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 1: then now here they are actually no, sorry, not on 324 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 1: the road. The Texans are at home hosting the Jags. Man, 325 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 1: what do you see here in this game? 326 00:14:48,640 --> 00:14:48,880 Speaker 2: Yeah? 327 00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:51,160 Speaker 3: I mean this, and this has doesn't really have anything 328 00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 3: to do with the recent performance from the Texans. You know, 329 00:14:53,800 --> 00:14:56,400 Speaker 3: if you look at just pure power ratings, you would 330 00:14:56,440 --> 00:14:58,440 Speaker 3: not get to this number. And I took four to 331 00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 3: a half yesterday. It's four right now, you would never 332 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:03,239 Speaker 3: get to this number. This is more like any legitimate 333 00:15:03,520 --> 00:15:05,240 Speaker 3: power rate and gets you to six, maybe six and 334 00:15:05,240 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 3: a half. 335 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:06,920 Speaker 2: You might get the seven. 336 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 3: But but there's there's a couple of things that play 337 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:11,560 Speaker 3: here that that that that's why I don't use pure 338 00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 3: power ratings because for one motivation and I know Doug 339 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:17,560 Speaker 3: Peterson yesterday said that you know, they're gonna play all 340 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 3: their starters, but doesn't mean that they're not gonna sit 341 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 3: guys who maybe tweak something in the first half, or 342 00:15:24,160 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 3: you know, Trayvon Walker is questionable, didn't play last week. 343 00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 3: Like maybe they hold them out, Uh, maybe they rotate 344 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:32,280 Speaker 3: guys in and out. Like there's just a lot of 345 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 3: different variations of you know, not necessarily going pushing full force. 346 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:39,480 Speaker 3: They have less than a ten percent chance of making 347 00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:42,240 Speaker 3: the wild card anyway, even if they win this game 348 00:15:42,280 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 3: and then lose next week. So and I'm sure they 349 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 3: are game planning for Tennessee. They're there, you know, maybe 350 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 3: they're doing a little bit on Houston, but they're they're 351 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 3: gonna put a lot of energy in the Look at 352 00:15:53,200 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 3: it here because it means so much so to me 353 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:58,120 Speaker 3: that that right there just knocks. 354 00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 2: Down some of the uh, you know, the gap in 355 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:01,120 Speaker 2: the power ratings. 356 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 3: And then from a matchup perspective, Trevor Lawrence he has 357 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 3: been playing obviously, has been playing out of his mind lately. 358 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:12,160 Speaker 3: He historically has really struggled against his Texans Lovey Smith defense, 359 00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:15,400 Speaker 3: this Cover two defense. There's a reason why they're zero 360 00:16:15,400 --> 00:16:17,760 Speaker 3: and three straight up and against the spread against the Texans. 361 00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 3: In his career against Cover two, he's fortieth out of 362 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:24,080 Speaker 3: forty four quarterbacks and completion percentage. He has one TD 363 00:16:24,280 --> 00:16:27,480 Speaker 3: six interceptions since the beginning of last season. And then 364 00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 3: includes you know some games I know recently where you know, 365 00:16:31,840 --> 00:16:34,280 Speaker 3: maybe he's he's improved, and you can make the claim 366 00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 3: that he's gotten better, he has not solved this defense. 367 00:16:36,600 --> 00:16:41,000 Speaker 3: So clearly there's something from that schematic perspective that you 368 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 3: know he has problems with. Now maybe you know, maybe 369 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:47,120 Speaker 3: he solves some of that. Who knows, but I'm willing 370 00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 3: to be okay, you know, backing the Texans, you know, 371 00:16:50,560 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 3: fourth fourth time facing Lawrence and potentially having his number. 372 00:16:54,800 --> 00:16:56,720 Speaker 3: And then you see, you know, his left tackle, Cam 373 00:16:56,800 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 3: Robinson is out Walker Little who's ninety eighth out of 374 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:02,600 Speaker 3: one hundred ten tackles in PFF pass block grade is 375 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:03,080 Speaker 3: going to start. 376 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 2: It's a huge down grade. 377 00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:07,600 Speaker 3: I mentioned Trayvon Walker may not play. They also lost 378 00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:11,000 Speaker 3: it was an underrated season ending injury to ed rusher 379 00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 3: Dwayne Smoot, second on the team in pressure rate. 380 00:17:13,359 --> 00:17:16,520 Speaker 2: He's one of the top thirty pass rushers according to PFF. 381 00:17:16,600 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 2: It's a big loss there. 382 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:20,639 Speaker 3: So you're potentially missing your two of your three best 383 00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:24,240 Speaker 3: defensive lineman. And this is not a good Jags defense 384 00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:26,760 Speaker 3: in general. I mean, this is a bottom five defense 385 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,080 Speaker 3: by most metrics, especially. 386 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:29,280 Speaker 2: Through the year. 387 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 3: So I just think that you know, from that perspective, 388 00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:34,600 Speaker 3: you look and you see Lawrence and the Jags are 389 00:17:34,640 --> 00:17:37,800 Speaker 3: zero to four against the spread in his career when 390 00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:39,720 Speaker 3: he's a favorite of three or more points, like, and 391 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:41,959 Speaker 3: they've lost all four straight up by the way, Like, 392 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 3: I just it's hard for me to back a young 393 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:47,560 Speaker 3: team like the Jags that might be looking ahead, that 394 00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:51,439 Speaker 3: might be sitting, you know, rotating some guys with you know, 395 00:17:51,480 --> 00:17:54,040 Speaker 3: Trevor Lawrence, who struggles against this type of defense he 396 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:55,080 Speaker 3: always has. 397 00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,280 Speaker 2: And you know, again, the Texans are feisty. They haven't quit. 398 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 2: So I'm okay taking any thing over field goal here. 399 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:05,480 Speaker 1: Really interesting. I you know, I have this projected at four, 400 00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 1: but I am very open to the idea that I 401 00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,639 Speaker 1: am not discounting the Jags enough because of two things 402 00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:17,960 Speaker 1: you mentioned. One Jacksonville looking ahead and preparing for that 403 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:21,480 Speaker 1: matchup with the Titans in week eighteen, and then the 404 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:25,680 Speaker 1: injuries you know, Kim Robinson a not insignificant injury there 405 00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:28,800 Speaker 1: that they're dealing with Treron Walker potentially not playing. And 406 00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 1: then Smoot as you mentioned, who's out. So U yeah, 407 00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:36,280 Speaker 1: I can I can see it if I'm not betting it. 408 00:18:36,359 --> 00:18:38,640 Speaker 1: If I were about it, I would be on the Texans, 409 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:39,440 Speaker 1: and I. 410 00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:41,280 Speaker 3: Will say, you know, some people say this maybe is 411 00:18:41,320 --> 00:18:44,600 Speaker 3: too much of a overreaction to what the Texans have 412 00:18:44,600 --> 00:18:45,720 Speaker 3: done lately, but I don't think it is. 413 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:48,479 Speaker 2: I mean, if you look earlier in this season, these 414 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:50,400 Speaker 2: two teams played in Jacksonville. 415 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,720 Speaker 3: The line closed only seven, and I wouldn't say I 416 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:55,640 Speaker 3: mean Texans were by far dead last, and everyone's power 417 00:18:55,720 --> 00:18:58,720 Speaker 3: rating back then the Jags were, you know, started off 418 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 3: the season. If you remember, they started off the season 419 00:19:00,600 --> 00:19:03,880 Speaker 3: with some impressive wins. They lost close to to the Eagles, 420 00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:06,280 Speaker 3: so you know they were highly rated early on. It 421 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:09,480 Speaker 3: was that middle season dip where they started to to. 422 00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:10,440 Speaker 2: Get a little bit of a setback. 423 00:19:10,520 --> 00:19:12,560 Speaker 3: So if you look at if you're minus seven at home, 424 00:19:12,760 --> 00:19:14,919 Speaker 3: and you do kind of the home and away, you know, 425 00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:18,119 Speaker 3: flip it, being minus four four and a half in 426 00:19:18,320 --> 00:19:23,119 Speaker 3: Jacksonville is actually kind of cheap. So, you know, like, 427 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:25,320 Speaker 3: I don't think that there's any sort of pure line 428 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:28,320 Speaker 3: value here that you were taking advantage of from a 429 00:19:28,400 --> 00:19:30,960 Speaker 3: Jacksonville perspective. I think that the line, you know, just 430 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:33,880 Speaker 3: from a pure power rating perspective, and you know, isn't 431 00:19:33,920 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 3: that far off of where it should be. 432 00:19:35,359 --> 00:19:39,000 Speaker 2: So you know, I'm okay here. I just think, you know, 433 00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:40,440 Speaker 2: I just think that. 434 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 3: Maybe maybe Trevor Lawrence solves the cover two and I 435 00:19:43,320 --> 00:19:45,920 Speaker 3: look like an idiot and the Texans get blown out. 436 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 2: But I'm okay taking a shot here on them. 437 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:52,040 Speaker 1: Yeah. And one more item her Jags playing their fourth 438 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,639 Speaker 1: game out of five on the road, so uh, you know, 439 00:19:55,720 --> 00:19:58,760 Speaker 1: not you would think an overwhelming matchup, but the you know, 440 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: the road that tends to where after that many games 441 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: away from home? Here? All right, one one game I'm 442 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:09,679 Speaker 1: looking at here, Browns plus two at Commanders and let 443 00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:15,919 Speaker 1: me make sure that's the current line here. Yeah, it's 444 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:19,080 Speaker 1: it's disgusting. It is two and a half at points 445 00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:20,920 Speaker 1: bet for people who are out there getting the best 446 00:20:20,920 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: of the number, but plus two Browns at the Commanders. 447 00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:28,560 Speaker 1: You know, Carson Wentz is you know, since the twenty 448 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:32,679 Speaker 1: seventeen knee injury, which I think really altered his career, 449 00:20:33,359 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 1: twenty six and thirty six against the spread, fourteen and 450 00:20:35,800 --> 00:20:38,640 Speaker 1: twenty one against the spread as a favorite since then. 451 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:42,000 Speaker 1: And this game to me really comes down to the 452 00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:45,680 Speaker 1: Browns pass defense against Carson Wentz and week swan through eleven, 453 00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:49,320 Speaker 1: the Browns defense was absolutely terrible. Key players were in 454 00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:51,760 Speaker 1: and out of the starting lineup based on injuries, and 455 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:54,560 Speaker 1: you know, they allowed teams to score pretty much at will. 456 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:57,639 Speaker 1: But since Week twelve, they've been pretty They've been pretty stout. 457 00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:00,840 Speaker 1: In weeks one through eleven, twenty six point nine points 458 00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:04,320 Speaker 1: allowed per game, since Week twelve, fourteen point eight points 459 00:21:04,320 --> 00:21:07,640 Speaker 1: per game. In the first part of the season, they 460 00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:11,919 Speaker 1: were number thirty one in defensive EPA. Since Week twelve, 461 00:21:12,119 --> 00:21:15,840 Speaker 1: number three in defensive EPA and especially strong against the pass, 462 00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: number one in defensive dropback EPA. Now, to contextualize this, 463 00:21:20,920 --> 00:21:24,760 Speaker 1: those five recent games have come against Tom Brady who is, 464 00:21:24,880 --> 00:21:27,879 Speaker 1: you know, not the Brady of previous seasons, Kyle Allen 465 00:21:28,000 --> 00:21:32,440 Speaker 1: who is barely an NFL quarterback, Joe Burrow who obviously 466 00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 1: is fantastic, but Tyler Huntley after him, and then Andy Dalton, 467 00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: who is you know, on that borderline between starter and backup. 468 00:21:41,920 --> 00:21:45,359 Speaker 1: That's not a great cohort. So the the statistics there 469 00:21:45,720 --> 00:21:49,159 Speaker 1: for the Browns probably a little skewed, but it's not 470 00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 1: as if Carson Wentz is any better than those those guys. 471 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:57,040 Speaker 1: Like then that collective cohort of passers. He's been mediocre 472 00:21:57,119 --> 00:21:59,560 Speaker 1: this year six point three adjusted yards per attempt, and 473 00:21:59,600 --> 00:22:02,119 Speaker 1: that's the same mark that he's had since twenty twenty. 474 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:04,720 Speaker 1: Six point three adjusted yards per attempt. Like, that's who 475 00:22:04,760 --> 00:22:07,680 Speaker 1: he is at this point in his career. He's a 476 00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: mediocre passer going against a pretty good pass defense and 477 00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:15,800 Speaker 1: Deshaun Watson for the Browns, he has not been good 478 00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:18,480 Speaker 1: right since he returned, and that's even if you exclude 479 00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:21,360 Speaker 1: last week's weather impacted game. He still has just six 480 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:24,560 Speaker 1: point two adjusted yards per attempt since returning to action 481 00:22:24,640 --> 00:22:27,720 Speaker 1: in week thirteen. But we know who he is, Like, 482 00:22:27,800 --> 00:22:30,320 Speaker 1: he is better than Carson Wentz and his four years 483 00:22:30,320 --> 00:22:32,880 Speaker 1: with the Texans, he had eight point six adjusted yards 484 00:22:32,920 --> 00:22:36,760 Speaker 1: per attempt. He's the better quarterback, uh, And I am 485 00:22:36,800 --> 00:22:40,159 Speaker 1: still expecting Whens to struggle against a rejuvenated pass defense. 486 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:44,600 Speaker 1: So if I can have the better quarterback, probably the 487 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:47,560 Speaker 1: better head coach, and I can get that less than 488 00:22:47,560 --> 00:22:50,199 Speaker 1: a field goal, I'm probably going to do it. So 489 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:53,400 Speaker 1: Browns plus two, that's where I'm looking. Cleve. I think 490 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:54,840 Speaker 1: you're also on this side of the game. 491 00:22:55,440 --> 00:22:57,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, And just to be you know, just to be 492 00:22:58,280 --> 00:23:00,880 Speaker 3: you know, straightforward, like I'm not because I'm a Browns fan, 493 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:03,239 Speaker 3: will I will bet or I will stay away from 494 00:23:03,440 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 3: games I don't like. So this is not a bias play. 495 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:08,480 Speaker 3: But yeah, I'm on the Browns as well. So the 496 00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:10,919 Speaker 3: only question is motivation. But there's no First of all, 497 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,320 Speaker 3: there's no tanking going on because they don't have a 498 00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:14,240 Speaker 3: first round pick, and I think they want to play for, 499 00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:18,600 Speaker 3: you know, play for Deshaun Watson. They really, they really 500 00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:20,480 Speaker 3: want to see what they've got there. So I don't 501 00:23:20,520 --> 00:23:23,200 Speaker 3: think that they're going to Hey, they're not sitting guys 502 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 3: and be I think the team is actually going to play, 503 00:23:26,400 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 3: And that's hard to that's hard to judge anyway, Like 504 00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:31,320 Speaker 3: you really can't make these. I mean you're just you're 505 00:23:31,359 --> 00:23:34,520 Speaker 3: just guessing if you're making decision on motivation, you know, 506 00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:36,040 Speaker 3: when when a team is kind of out of it. 507 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:38,400 Speaker 3: But I agree with everything you said. I mean, once 508 00:23:38,480 --> 00:23:40,560 Speaker 3: people forget how bad he was to start the year. 509 00:23:41,000 --> 00:23:43,119 Speaker 3: He was twenty ninth out of thirty three quarterbacks in 510 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:46,119 Speaker 3: both EPA and success rate before he got hurt. And 511 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:48,639 Speaker 3: that includes if you look at the pass defenses he 512 00:23:48,680 --> 00:23:51,919 Speaker 3: played the Bears, the Lions, the Jags, and the Titans. 513 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:54,399 Speaker 2: That's three of the bottom seven in e p A. 514 00:23:54,600 --> 00:23:58,520 Speaker 3: From a past perspective, the Titans are twenty first, so 515 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:00,879 Speaker 3: it's not like he was struggling against a bad competition. 516 00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:02,560 Speaker 3: So I mean, the Browns are better than I think 517 00:24:02,600 --> 00:24:05,719 Speaker 3: all of those defenses anyway. And then when you exclude 518 00:24:05,720 --> 00:24:08,480 Speaker 3: garbage time, I mean the Commanders as a whole, their 519 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:10,800 Speaker 3: offense was thirty first in the NFL in those six games. 520 00:24:11,280 --> 00:24:14,200 Speaker 3: I mean, they were gonna bench Wentz anyway, So him 521 00:24:14,240 --> 00:24:15,720 Speaker 3: being hurt was just kind of a convenient thing. 522 00:24:16,080 --> 00:24:18,040 Speaker 2: So they're pretty desperate. 523 00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:19,800 Speaker 3: Here, and it's hard for me to match a team 524 00:24:19,800 --> 00:24:21,919 Speaker 3: that really doesn't believe in any of their quarterbacks to 525 00:24:21,960 --> 00:24:24,040 Speaker 3: just all of a sudden be laying close to a 526 00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:26,240 Speaker 3: field goal against a competent team. And the Browns where 527 00:24:26,280 --> 00:24:28,719 Speaker 3: if you look at all the advanced metrics, I mean, 528 00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:31,160 Speaker 3: they are a top twelve to fifteen team by most 529 00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:35,840 Speaker 3: every you know, advanced database out there. I think that 530 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:37,679 Speaker 3: some of what happened the last. 531 00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:40,479 Speaker 2: Week is really skewing this. You know, it's funny. 532 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:43,960 Speaker 3: You see all the discussion on Twitter again, absent all 533 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:45,679 Speaker 3: the not you know, off the field stuff. We're not 534 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:47,680 Speaker 3: going to discuss that with Deshaun Watson, just. 535 00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:48,600 Speaker 2: Purely his play. 536 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 3: I mean, the people are using pure data and numbers 537 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:55,680 Speaker 3: from last week and the prior week in snow against 538 00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:58,639 Speaker 3: a top five defense in the Ravens to somehow discredit 539 00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:00,879 Speaker 3: the trade and talk about out At being a bust 540 00:25:00,880 --> 00:25:03,960 Speaker 3: like Russell Wilson. I mean, you're talking about those are 541 00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:07,280 Speaker 3: the worst weather conditions the NFL has maybe ever seen. 542 00:25:07,480 --> 00:25:08,200 Speaker 2: It's a win chip. 543 00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:10,920 Speaker 3: I mean we're talking about minus one degree or worse, 544 00:25:11,720 --> 00:25:15,520 Speaker 3: fifty mile an hour wins. The grass was impossible to 545 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:19,400 Speaker 3: even run on. I mean Amari Cooper dropped a touchdown. 546 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:24,479 Speaker 3: There's three drop touchdowns in that game for the season. 547 00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:28,240 Speaker 3: Deshaun Watson's had the highest drop rate of any quarterback 548 00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,520 Speaker 3: in the NFL. He really stunk against Houston. That was 549 00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:33,960 Speaker 3: one of the worst performances you'll see. He was a 550 00:25:33,960 --> 00:25:38,040 Speaker 3: lot better against Cincinnati and then he beat the Ravens again, 551 00:25:38,040 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 3: a top five defense. 552 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:41,760 Speaker 2: He did, you know, kind of made the plays he 553 00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:42,119 Speaker 2: had to. 554 00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:45,399 Speaker 3: He played pretty well there and then last week, like 555 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 3: just impossible to compete in those conditions. 556 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:49,320 Speaker 2: I mean, just to put that. 557 00:25:49,280 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 3: In perspective, Josh Allen in that Hurricane Weather game last year, 558 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:55,879 Speaker 3: on that Monday night against New England, that was probably 559 00:25:55,920 --> 00:25:58,960 Speaker 3: the closest comparison from a win perspective. He was fifteen 560 00:25:58,960 --> 00:26:01,120 Speaker 3: of thirty for one hundred forty five yards in that game. 561 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 3: But no one says a word about that, right like that, 562 00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 3: and that's a guy with a cannon for an arm, 563 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:07,919 Speaker 3: Like that's just impossible to throw in. So I'll just 564 00:26:08,200 --> 00:26:11,080 Speaker 3: I think people are just making way too much of that. Personally, 565 00:26:11,119 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 3: when I watch the games, he's gotten a lot better. 566 00:26:13,080 --> 00:26:15,119 Speaker 3: He's a lot more comfortable than he was in that 567 00:26:15,160 --> 00:26:18,280 Speaker 3: first start. So you know, the only issue here is 568 00:26:18,640 --> 00:26:21,199 Speaker 3: you're gonna have to You're gonna have to run the 569 00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:23,560 Speaker 3: ball against a really good Washington run defense, and that's 570 00:26:23,560 --> 00:26:25,119 Speaker 3: obviously not a good matchup for the Browns. 571 00:26:25,160 --> 00:26:28,160 Speaker 2: So it's gonna have to be Deshaun Watson who who 572 00:26:28,160 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 2: wins this game. 573 00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:31,320 Speaker 3: But I have faith that Carson Wentz is just not 574 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:34,880 Speaker 3: the guy to consistently sustain drives. And I think if 575 00:26:34,880 --> 00:26:36,600 Speaker 3: you're getting points here, you got to you gotta take 576 00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:38,399 Speaker 3: it with the Browns, all right. 577 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:41,880 Speaker 1: One game that you were looking at Colts at the Giants, 578 00:26:42,480 --> 00:26:46,000 Speaker 1: this was six, moved to five and a half at 579 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:49,600 Speaker 1: most places, still six at bet MGM, And I guess 580 00:26:49,640 --> 00:26:51,480 Speaker 1: say I have value on the Colts as well. I 581 00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:54,800 Speaker 1: just projected at four and a half. I did bet 582 00:26:54,880 --> 00:26:58,240 Speaker 1: the Giants too soon. I bet him on Monday before 583 00:26:58,240 --> 00:27:01,040 Speaker 1: the Colts played on Monday Night Football. In retrospect, I 584 00:27:01,040 --> 00:27:03,920 Speaker 1: think I reached on that bet. But you know, after 585 00:27:04,040 --> 00:27:08,840 Speaker 1: adjusting power ratings everything, once the week was over, I'm 586 00:27:08,880 --> 00:27:11,879 Speaker 1: now on Colts at plus four and a half. I 587 00:27:11,880 --> 00:27:14,160 Speaker 1: still don't know if I would actually want to bet 588 00:27:14,160 --> 00:27:17,600 Speaker 1: them though. There's just something about this team that just 589 00:27:17,680 --> 00:27:21,480 Speaker 1: makes me, you know, I feel weak like you. I 590 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:23,879 Speaker 1: don't have the will to bet when I have a 591 00:27:23,960 --> 00:27:26,160 Speaker 1: number that's on this team. But what do you seen 592 00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:28,119 Speaker 1: that gives you confidence in the Colts. 593 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:28,880 Speaker 2: Yeah. 594 00:27:28,880 --> 00:27:30,600 Speaker 3: So this is the thing about the NFL that I 595 00:27:30,640 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 3: tell people all the time, Like the bets that make 596 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 3: you queasy, like you just mentioned, uncomfortable, those usually mean 597 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:38,800 Speaker 3: that you're on the right side, because if it was 598 00:27:38,800 --> 00:27:41,159 Speaker 3: that easy, then everybody would win, right, Nobody wants to 599 00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:44,400 Speaker 3: bet the Colts. This look ahead was three, by the way, 600 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:46,960 Speaker 3: before that Monday Night debacle. So you're talking about a 601 00:27:47,040 --> 00:27:51,639 Speaker 3: full three point change and spread with no injuries to 602 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:56,160 Speaker 3: the Colts off of one game like that. That's pretty egregious. 603 00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:59,439 Speaker 2: And anyone who does this, you know, I've. 604 00:27:59,280 --> 00:28:01,800 Speaker 3: Been doing it for twenty plus years, like that is 605 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 3: that's an overreaction. 606 00:28:03,119 --> 00:28:04,000 Speaker 2: It just clearly is. 607 00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:07,960 Speaker 3: And now it doesn't mean it's gonna win, but you're 608 00:28:08,040 --> 00:28:11,560 Speaker 3: you're getting the best number. You are taking advantage of 609 00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:14,679 Speaker 3: a bias market, a near term bias market that is 610 00:28:14,760 --> 00:28:18,080 Speaker 3: just scared to death to back the Colts. And that's 611 00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:20,760 Speaker 3: you've got to take those. For me, I got to 612 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:22,840 Speaker 3: take that ten out of ten times, and if, like 613 00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:26,040 Speaker 3: I said, hopefully it hits at a higher rate than 614 00:28:26,080 --> 00:28:28,719 Speaker 3: you know, fifty five sixty percent, But you know, I 615 00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:30,760 Speaker 3: just have to do it and really so a couple 616 00:28:30,760 --> 00:28:32,760 Speaker 3: of things of that. So, first of all, the defense 617 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:34,479 Speaker 3: is still playing hard. I mean, they held a good 618 00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:37,800 Speaker 3: Chargers offense at twenty points. It wasn't as if they 619 00:28:37,800 --> 00:28:38,560 Speaker 3: got blown. 620 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:40,280 Speaker 2: Out of the water by that offense. 621 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:43,480 Speaker 3: So you know, they're they're keeping keeping them in games 622 00:28:43,560 --> 00:28:47,200 Speaker 3: or a top ten defense, you know, they I think 623 00:28:47,240 --> 00:28:51,080 Speaker 3: it was the Chargers had eight possessions that started in 624 00:28:51,120 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 3: their own territory. They only scored on three of those drives, 625 00:28:54,520 --> 00:28:56,640 Speaker 3: so it's not as if they just let the Chargers 626 00:28:56,640 --> 00:28:58,480 Speaker 3: march up and down the field. So I feel good 627 00:28:58,520 --> 00:29:01,040 Speaker 3: against you know, it's called the what they are. They're 628 00:29:01,040 --> 00:29:03,720 Speaker 3: a bad offense. They have no receiving and receiving corps. 629 00:29:04,320 --> 00:29:07,080 Speaker 3: It's pretty much Saquon Barkley and Daniel Jones on the 630 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:09,400 Speaker 3: Reid option, and so it's going to be a lower 631 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:12,160 Speaker 3: scoring game. You're getting six points in a total that's 632 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,120 Speaker 3: what thirty seven and a half thirty eight, So from 633 00:29:15,160 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 3: that perspective alone, you're getting value. And then look, Nick 634 00:29:18,160 --> 00:29:20,120 Speaker 3: Foles was awful last week, There's no doubt about it. 635 00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:22,800 Speaker 3: But you know one thing that you know, I think 636 00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:25,440 Speaker 3: that kind of was went a little bit unnoticed that 637 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:27,160 Speaker 3: people didn't take an account because I know some sharp 638 00:29:27,160 --> 00:29:28,080 Speaker 3: money was on the Colts. 639 00:29:28,280 --> 00:29:31,960 Speaker 2: I think it closed three. If you look at what 640 00:29:32,080 --> 00:29:33,080 Speaker 2: some of the quotes. 641 00:29:32,800 --> 00:29:35,600 Speaker 3: That Nick Foles had midweek, he never even took first 642 00:29:35,640 --> 00:29:38,280 Speaker 3: team reps until I think Wednesday or Thursday. Yeah, and 643 00:29:38,320 --> 00:29:40,480 Speaker 3: when they made that announcement, he was running scout team. 644 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:43,240 Speaker 3: So he had zero chemistry with any of those receivers. 645 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:45,320 Speaker 3: And you if you watch that game, there are a 646 00:29:45,400 --> 00:29:50,200 Speaker 3: couple of plays where like Alec Pierce was running, was 647 00:29:50,280 --> 00:29:52,880 Speaker 3: running like a slant and he threw the other way. 648 00:29:52,920 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 3: He thought he was running an out like it was. 649 00:29:54,680 --> 00:29:57,959 Speaker 3: It happened multiple times, so clearly he was rusty. 650 00:29:58,040 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 2: He didn't have any chemistry. 651 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:01,800 Speaker 3: Now you get another their full week of practice, he's 652 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:02,520 Speaker 3: gonna look better. 653 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:05,600 Speaker 2: He just is. That's as bad as it can look. 654 00:30:06,000 --> 00:30:07,760 Speaker 3: They're gonna be able. I mean, they can do some things. 655 00:30:07,800 --> 00:30:09,920 Speaker 3: They can run the ball on. This Giants defense is 656 00:30:09,960 --> 00:30:11,680 Speaker 3: one of the worst run defense in the NFL. I mean, 657 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:14,920 Speaker 3: this is one of the bottom five EPA defenses in 658 00:30:14,920 --> 00:30:16,880 Speaker 3: the NFL and you're laying six. They were laying four 659 00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:21,840 Speaker 3: and a half to a bad Houston team at home about. 660 00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:22,120 Speaker 2: A month ago. 661 00:30:22,480 --> 00:30:24,760 Speaker 3: So you're telling me that Houston back in the in 662 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 3: mid November is a point and a half better than 663 00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:30,120 Speaker 3: this Colts team right now, I just I just can't 664 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:33,120 Speaker 3: buy that, not with this defense, and you still got weapons, 665 00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:34,840 Speaker 3: you still got Michael Pittman, you still got peers, you 666 00:30:34,920 --> 00:30:37,480 Speaker 3: got tight ends that can play. You know, I just 667 00:30:37,520 --> 00:30:39,960 Speaker 3: think that it's just it's just an overreaction. 668 00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:42,280 Speaker 2: It's a veteran team. They should be able to you know, 669 00:30:42,320 --> 00:30:44,160 Speaker 2: they're not gonna quit. Now. 670 00:30:44,160 --> 00:30:46,680 Speaker 3: He's gonna have to contend with Wink Martindale blitz packages, 671 00:30:46,680 --> 00:30:49,280 Speaker 3: which is gonna gonna be tough. But you know one 672 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:51,600 Speaker 3: thing I did look at this year, I have I 673 00:30:51,600 --> 00:30:54,160 Speaker 3: have a game log of all the EPA performances by 674 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:57,200 Speaker 3: every team, and I went and looked at the ten 675 00:30:57,360 --> 00:31:01,400 Speaker 3: worst EPA performances a season. Because last week's Monday night 676 00:31:01,400 --> 00:31:04,800 Speaker 3: game against the Chargers was one of the worst we've 677 00:31:04,840 --> 00:31:07,400 Speaker 3: seen this year. If all you did was blindly back 678 00:31:07,480 --> 00:31:10,160 Speaker 3: those teams the next week, you'd go seven and three 679 00:31:10,200 --> 00:31:13,200 Speaker 3: against the spread. Because what happens is, again it's that 680 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:14,280 Speaker 3: overreaction to. 681 00:31:14,600 --> 00:31:15,560 Speaker 2: One horrible week. 682 00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:17,840 Speaker 3: We saw it actually earlier in this year. The worst 683 00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:21,440 Speaker 3: offensive performance all season was this Colts team with Sam 684 00:31:21,480 --> 00:31:23,760 Speaker 3: Ellinger against the Patriots when they lost twenty six to three. 685 00:31:24,400 --> 00:31:28,080 Speaker 3: They hired Jeff Saturday. Nobody wants to back them. The 686 00:31:28,120 --> 00:31:30,160 Speaker 3: line was six in Las Vegas, and they went out 687 00:31:30,240 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 3: right like, it's not saying this is the exact same situation, 688 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:34,960 Speaker 3: but it's not that much different and it's a much 689 00:31:35,320 --> 00:31:38,640 Speaker 3: you know, Vegas is much better than the Giants at 690 00:31:38,640 --> 00:31:41,920 Speaker 3: this point. So yeah, like all that being said, I 691 00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 3: just think that it's an overreaction. If this line was 692 00:31:44,160 --> 00:31:46,360 Speaker 3: three and a half, yeah, I'm not gonna take the Colts, 693 00:31:46,360 --> 00:31:47,880 Speaker 3: but at six and a half, six or five and 694 00:31:47,920 --> 00:31:51,400 Speaker 3: a half, I'm fine having them, you know, with their 695 00:31:51,440 --> 00:31:52,640 Speaker 3: defense keep it close here. 696 00:31:52,920 --> 00:31:56,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, you mentioned the Raiders there. That is one team 697 00:31:56,160 --> 00:31:59,080 Speaker 1: I am willing to bet against at this point. And 698 00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:04,360 Speaker 1: forty nine ers minus ten on the road in Las Vegas, 699 00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:06,440 Speaker 1: that feels like, I mean, that's a big number. I 700 00:32:06,600 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: like this on Monday at minus five. I put it 701 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:10,960 Speaker 1: in the Betting pros app. By the way, you can 702 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:13,480 Speaker 1: sync up with sportsbooks. In the Betting pros app. You 703 00:32:13,480 --> 00:32:15,160 Speaker 1: can get free betting and advice and picks. You can 704 00:32:15,200 --> 00:32:17,640 Speaker 1: track different experts in your own bets. And you can 705 00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:20,520 Speaker 1: set alerts, so we monitor all the major sportsbooks. When 706 00:32:20,560 --> 00:32:22,320 Speaker 1: one of them has a line move that hits a 707 00:32:22,360 --> 00:32:24,880 Speaker 1: threshold you've set, you get an alert that tells you 708 00:32:24,920 --> 00:32:26,760 Speaker 1: where you can make the bet. You can download the 709 00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:30,240 Speaker 1: app today in the Apple or Google Placed or forty 710 00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:32,960 Speaker 1: nine ers minus ten. It's a big number, but I 711 00:32:33,000 --> 00:32:37,320 Speaker 1: have this projected at eleven point two five right now. 712 00:32:37,840 --> 00:32:41,480 Speaker 1: And Kyle Shanahan on the road, including the postseason, has 713 00:32:41,520 --> 00:32:43,920 Speaker 1: been pretty strong for his career, thirty and twenty against 714 00:32:43,960 --> 00:32:46,920 Speaker 1: the spread. Brock Perty, I mean, I'm not gonna overweight 715 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:50,280 Speaker 1: the sample, but he's looked good in his you know, 716 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:54,360 Speaker 1: three and a half four games as the primary quarterback 717 00:32:54,560 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 1: for the forty nine ers three to zero against the 718 00:32:56,560 --> 00:33:00,200 Speaker 1: spread to open his career. And man, you know, with 719 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,880 Speaker 1: the benching of Derek Carr, the Raiders are starting backup 720 00:33:03,920 --> 00:33:08,000 Speaker 1: quarterback Jared Siddam on plus eyed siddlm for your veteran. 721 00:33:08,240 --> 00:33:11,480 Speaker 1: He spent his entire career under head coach Josh McDaniels, 722 00:33:11,520 --> 00:33:13,520 Speaker 1: you know, first with the Patriots and then with the 723 00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:16,360 Speaker 1: Raiders this year, so he knows the system. He should 724 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:20,080 Speaker 1: know the system very well. That said, there are a 725 00:33:20,120 --> 00:33:24,280 Speaker 1: lot of negatives. He's a forgotten former fourth rounder with 726 00:33:24,440 --> 00:33:28,520 Speaker 1: little NFL experience, no NFL starts. He has just sixty 727 00:33:28,520 --> 00:33:30,800 Speaker 1: one pass attempts in his career, and he has looked 728 00:33:30,960 --> 00:33:34,160 Speaker 1: awful in those sixty one pass attempts. He's converted that 729 00:33:34,240 --> 00:33:37,240 Speaker 1: into just three hundred and forty two yards, two touchdowns, 730 00:33:37,280 --> 00:33:40,800 Speaker 1: four interceptions. I believe three point three adjusted yards per 731 00:33:40,800 --> 00:33:43,280 Speaker 1: attempt is the mark that he has for his career, 732 00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:47,280 Speaker 1: which is like sub backup level type of mark, Like 733 00:33:47,320 --> 00:33:49,960 Speaker 1: that's what you would expect out of a rookie quarterback 734 00:33:49,960 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 1: who's a third stringer who's just thrown in on short preparation. 735 00:33:54,080 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: He also has a nine point zero percent sack rate. 736 00:33:57,880 --> 00:34:01,000 Speaker 1: He offers nothing as a runner, and then he's going 737 00:34:01,080 --> 00:34:03,960 Speaker 1: against if not the best defense in the league, top 738 00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:06,240 Speaker 1: three defense and the forty nine ers, number one in 739 00:34:06,320 --> 00:34:11,000 Speaker 1: EPA per play, number two in dropack EPA. Just a 740 00:34:11,080 --> 00:34:14,520 Speaker 1: terrible matchup. And regardless of whatever you think about Car, 741 00:34:14,800 --> 00:34:19,799 Speaker 1: I think Stidham is an unquestioned downgrade, a significant downgrade 742 00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:22,399 Speaker 1: from Car. So given the matchup, I just I think 743 00:34:22,400 --> 00:34:24,640 Speaker 1: he's drawing dead. And if this number is at ten, 744 00:34:25,680 --> 00:34:27,600 Speaker 1: I'm going to bet it because I think it should 745 00:34:27,640 --> 00:34:30,560 Speaker 1: be higher. Again, I think eleven is where this number 746 00:34:30,600 --> 00:34:34,719 Speaker 1: should be. Cleve, I'm going to sense that because you 747 00:34:34,800 --> 00:34:39,480 Speaker 1: are sharp and you don't mind taking bets that make 748 00:34:39,480 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 1: you feel a little bit queasy, you if you were 749 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:44,560 Speaker 1: to be betting this, you might be on the raiders here. 750 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:48,520 Speaker 1: But any thoughts on this game here? No? 751 00:34:48,760 --> 00:34:52,640 Speaker 3: Actually, you know, I did get a tip off. I 752 00:34:52,680 --> 00:34:56,440 Speaker 3: was driving home yesterday from the office around lunchtime. I 753 00:34:56,560 --> 00:34:58,279 Speaker 3: got a tip off that car was not going to 754 00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:01,120 Speaker 3: play and maybe some other and this the line was 755 00:35:01,120 --> 00:35:01,960 Speaker 3: still at five and a half. 756 00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:03,439 Speaker 2: The total was in forty four and a half. 757 00:35:03,960 --> 00:35:07,040 Speaker 3: So I immediately grab both the under and the niners. 758 00:35:08,680 --> 00:35:10,799 Speaker 3: But yeah, so I got lucky there, I guess. But 759 00:35:10,840 --> 00:35:14,160 Speaker 3: at this point, I just laying double digits on the road, 760 00:35:14,200 --> 00:35:15,000 Speaker 3: no matter how good the. 761 00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:17,719 Speaker 2: Team is, is always a dicey proposition. 762 00:35:18,280 --> 00:35:20,480 Speaker 3: I mean, it looks so good on paper, but it's 763 00:35:20,760 --> 00:35:23,000 Speaker 3: it's just hard, especially lately this year, I think. 764 00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:25,560 Speaker 2: I mean, I'm not even sure if any double digit 765 00:35:26,000 --> 00:35:28,440 Speaker 2: favorites have covered on the road. I have to think 766 00:35:28,480 --> 00:35:29,359 Speaker 2: about it. I know that. 767 00:35:29,280 --> 00:35:33,560 Speaker 3: The the Eagles could not against the Texans. There's a 768 00:35:33,560 --> 00:35:36,439 Speaker 3: couple other ones that stand out it doesn't happen. 769 00:35:36,480 --> 00:35:38,480 Speaker 1: It hasn't happened. It hasn't happened that often. 770 00:35:38,960 --> 00:35:41,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, so and the other So if the if the 771 00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:45,160 Speaker 3: Niners were this was mid season, the Niners are one 772 00:35:45,200 --> 00:35:49,520 Speaker 3: hundred percent motivated. I can understand it more at you know, 773 00:35:49,560 --> 00:35:50,360 Speaker 3: eleven or whatever. 774 00:35:50,440 --> 00:35:51,879 Speaker 2: But they don't. 775 00:35:51,920 --> 00:35:54,279 Speaker 3: I mean they're not They're trying, but they're not like 776 00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:58,279 Speaker 3: going full force. That's the only question is you know, 777 00:35:58,360 --> 00:36:00,680 Speaker 3: how motivated are you to really just you know, push 778 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:01,960 Speaker 3: the pedal to the metal. 779 00:36:02,520 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 2: Well, I think what you need you're gonna. 780 00:36:03,880 --> 00:36:08,600 Speaker 3: Need if you lay double digits is some defensive turnovers, 781 00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:12,880 Speaker 3: which is obviously with this defense, very possible. But I 782 00:36:12,600 --> 00:36:15,759 Speaker 3: don't guess it's hard. Stidum isn't very good. But you know, 783 00:36:16,080 --> 00:36:17,759 Speaker 3: we see it all the time. This game could be 784 00:36:17,840 --> 00:36:22,040 Speaker 3: twenty seven to ten late and all the backups are 785 00:36:22,040 --> 00:36:24,120 Speaker 3: in and Sidham just you know, walks up and down 786 00:36:24,160 --> 00:36:26,279 Speaker 3: the field to get this to twenty seven seventeen and 787 00:36:26,320 --> 00:36:29,520 Speaker 3: then they cover right. So I personally would stay away. 788 00:36:29,600 --> 00:36:33,040 Speaker 3: I wouldn't touch either side at this point. But if 789 00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:35,240 Speaker 3: you got in early like you did, then you're sitting 790 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:39,239 Speaker 3: really pretty So it's a nice early wager. That's that's 791 00:36:39,320 --> 00:36:40,239 Speaker 3: real CLV, right. 792 00:36:40,719 --> 00:36:41,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. 793 00:36:41,280 --> 00:36:45,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, So one one game you are touching the Jets 794 00:36:45,800 --> 00:36:48,840 Speaker 1: on the road at the Seahawks. Minus one and a 795 00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:51,520 Speaker 1: half is the number here with the Jets favored. And 796 00:36:52,120 --> 00:36:55,520 Speaker 1: you know this, I believe did this flip when the 797 00:36:55,560 --> 00:36:58,520 Speaker 1: news was released that Mike White was gonna play. I 798 00:36:58,520 --> 00:36:59,800 Speaker 1: don't remember where this opened. 799 00:37:00,680 --> 00:37:01,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, it opened. 800 00:37:02,800 --> 00:37:06,719 Speaker 3: I think Seattle was minus one. It was around minus one. Yeah, 801 00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:08,399 Speaker 3: to pick them, it was right around there. 802 00:37:08,520 --> 00:37:11,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, so it's flipped flipped through zero towards the Jets, 803 00:37:11,880 --> 00:37:14,680 Speaker 1: but still in that yeah, that pick them territory. My 804 00:37:14,760 --> 00:37:18,719 Speaker 1: projections lean slightly towards Seattle. But I haven't bet it. 805 00:37:18,760 --> 00:37:20,560 Speaker 1: I have no desire to bet them because I just 806 00:37:20,600 --> 00:37:22,880 Speaker 1: I know that there's a chance I haven't downgraded them 807 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 1: enough based on what we've seen recently out of Geno Smith, 808 00:37:26,719 --> 00:37:28,960 Speaker 1: uh and the return of Mike White, I think gives 809 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:31,799 Speaker 1: gives the Jets an edge here. What do you see 810 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:33,000 Speaker 1: in this matchup? 811 00:37:34,320 --> 00:37:35,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm on the Jets. 812 00:37:36,000 --> 00:37:38,480 Speaker 3: I'm okay laying anything under three, to be honest, and 813 00:37:38,600 --> 00:37:41,359 Speaker 3: once you get to kind of pick them to two 814 00:37:41,400 --> 00:37:42,719 Speaker 3: and a half, it's kind of all the same. 815 00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:45,760 Speaker 2: It's never hasn't really mattered. If you look back the last. 816 00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:48,400 Speaker 3: Two years, you know, you just just lay it doesn't 817 00:37:48,400 --> 00:37:51,239 Speaker 3: really it doesn't really make a difference. You know, the 818 00:37:51,280 --> 00:37:54,720 Speaker 3: team that wins usually covers here. So I'm not worried about, 819 00:37:54,760 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 3: you know, if it flip flopping between one and two 820 00:37:56,760 --> 00:37:57,200 Speaker 3: or whatever. 821 00:37:57,320 --> 00:37:59,720 Speaker 2: So I don't think the market has. 822 00:37:59,560 --> 00:38:03,080 Speaker 3: Fully asked the difference between Mike White and Zach Wilson. 823 00:38:03,440 --> 00:38:05,919 Speaker 3: I think people were projecting a couple of weeks ago 824 00:38:06,320 --> 00:38:08,680 Speaker 3: that maybe it's a you know, point point and a half, 825 00:38:09,320 --> 00:38:11,680 Speaker 3: you know, upgrade than Mike White. But once we saw 826 00:38:11,719 --> 00:38:13,799 Speaker 3: White play and then we went back to Wilson and 827 00:38:13,840 --> 00:38:15,919 Speaker 3: saw how much worse he was, I think he really 828 00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:19,840 Speaker 3: is really is a three point upgrade to me between 829 00:38:19,880 --> 00:38:21,719 Speaker 3: White and Wilson. And so I don't think that's being 830 00:38:21,760 --> 00:38:25,640 Speaker 3: fully documented here. I mean, look at since the beginning 831 00:38:25,680 --> 00:38:28,080 Speaker 3: of last season, White's twenty fourth out of fifty eight 832 00:38:28,160 --> 00:38:32,640 Speaker 3: quarterbacks in EPA, Wilson's fifty second out of fifty eight quarterbacks. Now, again, 833 00:38:32,680 --> 00:38:36,040 Speaker 3: the sample size is smaller, but Mike White had to 834 00:38:36,080 --> 00:38:39,160 Speaker 3: play in some tough conditions. I mean, he played Buffalo twice, 835 00:38:39,239 --> 00:38:42,840 Speaker 3: including once in snow. He played in a in a 836 00:38:42,960 --> 00:38:45,920 Speaker 3: driving rainstorm. Yeah, I was against a bad Bears defense. 837 00:38:45,960 --> 00:38:48,120 Speaker 3: But in his first starting at driving rainstorm, it's not 838 00:38:48,160 --> 00:38:51,239 Speaker 3: easy to do. He had to play in Minnesota. Yeah, 839 00:38:51,280 --> 00:38:53,640 Speaker 3: their defense isn't great, but that's a loud stadium, that's 840 00:38:53,640 --> 00:38:57,000 Speaker 3: a playoff team, that's not again, not an easy environment. 841 00:38:57,080 --> 00:38:59,560 Speaker 2: So he's been battle tested from that perspective. 842 00:38:59,600 --> 00:39:03,440 Speaker 3: Now he has to face Seattle defense, which is one 843 00:39:03,480 --> 00:39:05,239 Speaker 3: of the worst in the NFL, and they've gotten worse 844 00:39:05,239 --> 00:39:08,440 Speaker 3: and worse as the years year has gone on. I 845 00:39:08,440 --> 00:39:10,399 Speaker 3: mean last week was the first time in the last 846 00:39:10,400 --> 00:39:13,880 Speaker 3: six weeks that their defense is held an opposing offense 847 00:39:14,040 --> 00:39:17,279 Speaker 3: below their season EPA average. So and in that game, 848 00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:20,040 Speaker 3: Casey was kind of barely even showing anything and they 849 00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:22,359 Speaker 3: typically played down to competition, so and that. 850 00:39:22,320 --> 00:39:23,760 Speaker 2: Game still ended in double digits. 851 00:39:23,840 --> 00:39:27,160 Speaker 3: Right, So, you know, this is not the Seattle defense 852 00:39:27,239 --> 00:39:30,480 Speaker 3: is just they're not playing well. And so I have 853 00:39:30,560 --> 00:39:33,040 Speaker 3: faith that Mike White's going to be able to, you know, 854 00:39:33,120 --> 00:39:34,560 Speaker 3: put some points on the board. 855 00:39:35,120 --> 00:39:37,680 Speaker 2: He's got all his weapons. Corey Davis is playing this week. 856 00:39:38,040 --> 00:39:40,600 Speaker 3: This you know, the Seattle defense is kind of dead 857 00:39:41,719 --> 00:39:45,160 Speaker 3: and and we look at defensively and I think that 858 00:39:45,200 --> 00:39:46,959 Speaker 3: the team just plays better with Mike White. 859 00:39:46,960 --> 00:39:48,640 Speaker 2: To be honest, I just you could see it last week. 860 00:39:48,680 --> 00:39:51,640 Speaker 3: They were deflated when whenever Zach Wilson would just you know, 861 00:39:51,880 --> 00:39:53,960 Speaker 3: go three and out, and it's just they you could 862 00:39:54,000 --> 00:39:55,080 Speaker 3: tell they were not up for it. 863 00:39:55,560 --> 00:39:57,040 Speaker 2: I think they'll play better with Mike White. 864 00:39:57,120 --> 00:40:01,880 Speaker 3: Defensively, by far, the Jets are the best unit on 865 00:40:01,920 --> 00:40:04,400 Speaker 3: the field. And if Tyler Lockett doesn't play again, and 866 00:40:04,480 --> 00:40:06,319 Speaker 3: I don't know if what you've seen, but I can't 867 00:40:06,320 --> 00:40:08,239 Speaker 3: imagine he plays. And if he does, he's gonna be 868 00:40:08,320 --> 00:40:10,520 Speaker 3: He's got like maybe he has a cast on his hand. 869 00:40:10,560 --> 00:40:11,920 Speaker 2: I'm not really sure. It doesn't seem like it's a 870 00:40:11,960 --> 00:40:12,880 Speaker 2: good idea for receiver. 871 00:40:13,760 --> 00:40:16,920 Speaker 3: They've got no options outside of DK Metcalf. I mean, 872 00:40:16,920 --> 00:40:19,160 Speaker 3: Marquis Goodwin was supposed to step up. I know some 873 00:40:19,200 --> 00:40:22,319 Speaker 3: guys are touting him as a DFS cheapy last week, 874 00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 3: and he got shut out and he got hurt. He 875 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:27,759 Speaker 3: heard his wrist during the game. And so you've got 876 00:40:27,760 --> 00:40:29,880 Speaker 3: two great corners. You've got two top ten corners in 877 00:40:29,880 --> 00:40:32,399 Speaker 3: the NFL, and Saust Gardner and DJ Reid. So even 878 00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:35,480 Speaker 3: if you wanted to move Dk Metcalf all over the field, 879 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:38,239 Speaker 3: like you've got really good cornerback on each side, and 880 00:40:38,280 --> 00:40:40,400 Speaker 3: then who does who does Geno go to? He just 881 00:40:40,440 --> 00:40:44,000 Speaker 3: doesn't have that option. The right tackle. Abraham Lucas is 882 00:40:44,560 --> 00:40:47,759 Speaker 3: a good rookie, he's questionable, he may not play. And 883 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:52,600 Speaker 3: I just think that this defense is really gonna impact Gino, 884 00:40:52,680 --> 00:40:55,160 Speaker 3: who's's come back to earth lately. So you know, we've 885 00:40:55,160 --> 00:40:58,799 Speaker 3: seen Seattle face three other top five elite level defenses, 886 00:40:58,840 --> 00:41:02,080 Speaker 3: the Niners twice, and then in the opener they scored seventeen, 887 00:41:02,200 --> 00:41:03,920 Speaker 3: zero and thirteen points in those games. 888 00:41:03,920 --> 00:41:07,239 Speaker 2: Like when they've had to step up in competition, they 889 00:41:07,280 --> 00:41:08,280 Speaker 2: haven't been able to do anything. 890 00:41:08,320 --> 00:41:11,560 Speaker 3: They only scored with ten points against Kansas City last week. 891 00:41:11,640 --> 00:41:14,840 Speaker 3: Like they're just not producing at a level that was 892 00:41:14,840 --> 00:41:16,759 Speaker 3: even close to the earlier of the year. So I 893 00:41:16,760 --> 00:41:19,759 Speaker 3: think a lot of maybe your numbers, or a lot 894 00:41:19,800 --> 00:41:23,080 Speaker 3: of people's numbers are maybe if you're equally waiting all 895 00:41:23,160 --> 00:41:25,640 Speaker 3: the games, you're probably gonna get to that, you know, 896 00:41:25,680 --> 00:41:28,239 Speaker 3: pick them or maybe Seattle minus one. But if you 897 00:41:28,320 --> 00:41:30,960 Speaker 3: wait the more recent performance a little bit more, and 898 00:41:30,960 --> 00:41:35,200 Speaker 3: then you take an account that Tyler Lockett may not 899 00:41:35,280 --> 00:41:38,080 Speaker 3: play or probably won't play, I think that you know 900 00:41:38,200 --> 00:41:41,160 Speaker 3: that gets you to maybe the Jets as a slight favorite, 901 00:41:41,160 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 3: So that's where I'm at. 902 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:43,480 Speaker 2: I just think it's a much better. 903 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:47,200 Speaker 3: Team, and I think that Mike White will will play 904 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:49,560 Speaker 3: well here, So I do like the Jets here. 905 00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I'm very open to the possibility that 906 00:41:53,120 --> 00:41:57,120 Speaker 1: I haven't downgraded the Seahawks fast enough to account for 907 00:41:57,160 --> 00:41:59,440 Speaker 1: what we've seen. And as you mentioned, yeah, Tyler Lockett 908 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:01,840 Speaker 1: looks like he's going to be out. Mark he's Goodwin 909 00:42:01,920 --> 00:42:05,080 Speaker 1: dealing with the wrist injury. And Will Disley I believe, 910 00:42:05,200 --> 00:42:08,120 Speaker 1: is also out. Not as if he's a major contributor 911 00:42:08,600 --> 00:42:10,960 Speaker 1: in terms of like the overall production, but I mean 912 00:42:11,000 --> 00:42:14,239 Speaker 1: he he plays a not insignificant number of snaps each game, 913 00:42:14,320 --> 00:42:18,239 Speaker 1: So just another player there that they kind of depend on. 914 00:42:18,400 --> 00:42:20,799 Speaker 1: Who doesn't see Mike he's going to be there. 915 00:42:20,920 --> 00:42:24,279 Speaker 4: So Kenneth Walker didn't practice yesterday, by the way, right, Yeah, yeah, 916 00:42:24,320 --> 00:42:26,040 Speaker 4: So I mean, who knows what's going on with his ankle, 917 00:42:26,080 --> 00:42:27,799 Speaker 4: and he had a decent game last week, but he 918 00:42:27,800 --> 00:42:31,359 Speaker 4: hasn't done anything in the last month either, So it's 919 00:42:31,440 --> 00:42:34,120 Speaker 4: just this is a completely if you flip flopped, you know, 920 00:42:34,200 --> 00:42:36,239 Speaker 4: if if the last six weeks was the first six 921 00:42:36,280 --> 00:42:37,960 Speaker 4: weeks of the season. I mean, I mean the Jets 922 00:42:38,000 --> 00:42:40,200 Speaker 4: would probably be laying three and a half. I think 923 00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:42,640 Speaker 4: some of the early season numbers are getting baked in 924 00:42:42,680 --> 00:42:45,560 Speaker 4: here for Seattle and they're playing more like the kind 925 00:42:45,600 --> 00:42:49,799 Speaker 4: of the the priors coming into the year. Then they 926 00:42:49,880 --> 00:42:52,279 Speaker 4: you know, then they kind of overperformed early in the year. 927 00:42:52,360 --> 00:42:55,160 Speaker 4: So yeah, I'll take the Jets on the road and 928 00:42:55,200 --> 00:42:55,759 Speaker 4: swallow it. 929 00:42:56,280 --> 00:42:59,040 Speaker 1: Yeah. And for my fantasy article, Mike White is one 930 00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:02,040 Speaker 1: of the guys who is my favorites this week. He's 931 00:43:02,080 --> 00:43:05,799 Speaker 1: you know, great matchup as you mentioned there. Okay, one 932 00:43:06,040 --> 00:43:08,680 Speaker 1: one more game I want to quickly get your thoughts on, 933 00:43:09,040 --> 00:43:11,560 Speaker 1: uh not in the outline, but I mean Monday night football. 934 00:43:11,600 --> 00:43:14,080 Speaker 1: This it might not be the game of the year 935 00:43:14,400 --> 00:43:17,479 Speaker 1: Bills at Bengals, but I mean this is it looks 936 00:43:17,520 --> 00:43:20,160 Speaker 1: like it's gonna be a great game. And uh, you 937 00:43:20,200 --> 00:43:24,799 Speaker 1: know Bengals one let me see here, uh one one 938 00:43:24,840 --> 00:43:28,000 Speaker 1: and a half point underdogs. I believe this number was 939 00:43:28,200 --> 00:43:31,520 Speaker 1: two and a half in the look ahead market, which 940 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:34,279 Speaker 1: shout out me. That's a that's where I bet it. 941 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:34,520 Speaker 3: Uh. 942 00:43:34,560 --> 00:43:37,400 Speaker 1: And by the way, I should say the Bills, you know, 943 00:43:38,400 --> 00:43:40,000 Speaker 1: a lot of wide receivers there one of them is 944 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:43,240 Speaker 1: Isaiah McKenzie. We're giving away a free signed Isaiah McKenzie 945 00:43:43,239 --> 00:43:45,680 Speaker 1: Buffalo Bill's Many helmet from Prissy and Auction. If you 946 00:43:45,719 --> 00:43:47,520 Speaker 1: want a chance to win it, subscribe to the Betting 947 00:43:47,560 --> 00:43:49,919 Speaker 1: Pros YouTube channel right now. Comment below on the video. 948 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:53,080 Speaker 1: We will announce a winner in a future episode. Do 949 00:43:53,120 --> 00:43:56,560 Speaker 1: you have any thoughts on this game? Bill's favored by 950 00:43:56,640 --> 00:43:59,160 Speaker 1: one on the Road Doman. 951 00:43:59,200 --> 00:44:00,200 Speaker 2: I think it's be a great game. 952 00:44:00,360 --> 00:44:02,839 Speaker 3: I think it'd be a great You could literally tease 953 00:44:03,080 --> 00:44:07,080 Speaker 3: either side if I mean, whoever, whoever is hits one and. 954 00:44:07,000 --> 00:44:09,680 Speaker 2: A half, just tease that side and call it a day. 955 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:12,839 Speaker 3: Yeah, so at this point, looking like the Bengals, if 956 00:44:12,880 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 3: you can get the that's that's my piece of advice. 957 00:44:15,200 --> 00:44:18,080 Speaker 3: You know, maybe pair them up, you know, with a 958 00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:21,960 Speaker 3: team like either the Steelers or you know. 959 00:44:22,080 --> 00:44:23,920 Speaker 2: Maybe I'm trying to think there was another. 960 00:44:24,160 --> 00:44:27,200 Speaker 3: The Browns is another good teaser leg if you go 961 00:44:27,280 --> 00:44:30,040 Speaker 3: Browns and then you know, wait for that one and. 962 00:44:29,960 --> 00:44:33,560 Speaker 2: A half to pop eventually hopefully with with the Bengals, 963 00:44:33,600 --> 00:44:36,160 Speaker 2: and you can do that. But yeah, straight ahead, I mean, 964 00:44:36,360 --> 00:44:37,360 Speaker 2: if I like, if I'm in a. 965 00:44:37,360 --> 00:44:38,960 Speaker 3: Pick on pool, I'll take the Bills just because I 966 00:44:39,000 --> 00:44:42,160 Speaker 3: think they're the better team and I just trust trust their. 967 00:44:42,040 --> 00:44:45,479 Speaker 2: Defense a little bit more. But you know, it's hard. 968 00:44:45,560 --> 00:44:47,719 Speaker 2: I mean, this this Bengals team. I will say. 969 00:44:47,800 --> 00:44:49,239 Speaker 3: You know, two weeks ago, I was actually on the 970 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:52,719 Speaker 3: Bucks in since versus Cincinnati. They were blowing them out 971 00:44:52,800 --> 00:44:55,919 Speaker 3: and just crazy flurry of I was actually at dinner. 972 00:44:55,960 --> 00:44:57,920 Speaker 3: I was on vacation with my family, and I was 973 00:44:57,960 --> 00:45:00,359 Speaker 3: like feeling good about my pick at halftime, and then 974 00:45:00,360 --> 00:45:02,160 Speaker 3: I look at my phone. In every two minutes it's 975 00:45:02,320 --> 00:45:04,720 Speaker 3: Bengals have the ball inside the bank and the Bucks territory. 976 00:45:04,719 --> 00:45:06,480 Speaker 3: I couldn't believe what was going on. I mean, that 977 00:45:06,640 --> 00:45:10,799 Speaker 3: was a flurry of random occurrences. I mean, nine times 978 00:45:10,800 --> 00:45:13,239 Speaker 3: out of ten, the Bucks probably win that game if 979 00:45:13,320 --> 00:45:15,680 Speaker 3: they don't go crazy with that. And then you know, 980 00:45:15,760 --> 00:45:19,560 Speaker 3: last week you Ramandre Stevenson is potentially going in for 981 00:45:19,680 --> 00:45:22,400 Speaker 3: a game winning touchdown. You know, the perception here is 982 00:45:22,400 --> 00:45:24,200 Speaker 3: probably a little bit different. You might get Buffalo at 983 00:45:24,200 --> 00:45:26,759 Speaker 3: two and a half to three, So you know, I think, 984 00:45:26,840 --> 00:45:30,200 Speaker 3: all things being equal, I would probably lean Buffalo straight up. 985 00:45:30,239 --> 00:45:32,680 Speaker 3: But you know, I think a Bengals teaser is probably 986 00:45:32,719 --> 00:45:33,440 Speaker 3: your best bet. 987 00:45:33,680 --> 00:45:35,919 Speaker 1: Yeah, and Josh Allen on the road for his career 988 00:45:36,000 --> 00:45:38,880 Speaker 1: historically has been good against the spread. All right, Cleve, 989 00:45:39,200 --> 00:45:41,680 Speaker 1: thanks for joining us. Awesome stuff. Let the people know 990 00:45:41,800 --> 00:45:44,120 Speaker 1: where to find you on social and where to follow 991 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:44,560 Speaker 1: your work. 992 00:45:45,400 --> 00:45:48,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean my Twitter handles cleve ta and then 993 00:45:48,440 --> 00:45:53,960 Speaker 3: you can see my website on their Cleveanalytics dot com 994 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:56,399 Speaker 3: just kind of a I've got some free stuff up there, 995 00:45:56,400 --> 00:45:59,480 Speaker 3: but then also got a paywall for subscribers, just kind 996 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:03,120 Speaker 3: of you know, I'll have a playoff package up there 997 00:46:03,160 --> 00:46:06,480 Speaker 3: where I write up every single game of the playoffs, 998 00:46:06,800 --> 00:46:09,279 Speaker 3: you know, side in total that I'm on a bunch 999 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:12,240 Speaker 3: of props through DFS analysis, kind of a one stop 1000 00:46:12,239 --> 00:46:14,320 Speaker 3: shop if you will, for anyone. 1001 00:46:14,080 --> 00:46:18,520 Speaker 2: Who's looking for some content. So you know that's up 1002 00:46:18,520 --> 00:46:20,840 Speaker 2: there on the website. So I appreciate you having me on. 1003 00:46:20,960 --> 00:46:22,879 Speaker 2: This is a good discussion, all right. 1004 00:46:22,880 --> 00:46:26,000 Speaker 1: He's cleeve Ta. I am Matthew Friedman at matt fe Oracle. 1005 00:46:26,120 --> 00:46:28,160 Speaker 1: Check out Betting Pros and Fantasy Pros for all of 1006 00:46:28,160 --> 00:46:31,520 Speaker 1: my work best bets, player props, fantasy favorites, player projections 1007 00:46:31,520 --> 00:46:33,840 Speaker 1: and rankings, and more. If you like the show, please 1008 00:46:33,920 --> 00:46:36,239 Speaker 1: rate and review on your favorite podcast app that is 1009 00:46:36,280 --> 00:46:38,640 Speaker 1: going to do it for this week seventeen Best Bets 1010 00:46:38,760 --> 00:46:41,640 Speaker 1: edition of the Betting Pros podcast. Thanks for tuning in, 1011 00:46:41,680 --> 00:46:43,960 Speaker 1: good luck, and see you next episode.