Speaker 1: Hey, everybody, it's me Josh. And since it's summertime, it's
Speaker 1: movie time. I am oh. So I've chosen our super
Speaker 1: interesting two thousand fifteen movie Talk episode some movies that
Speaker 1: changed filmmaking. You don't have to be a cinema file
Speaker 1: to enjoy this episode, so don't be scared off. And
Speaker 1: there's a part right around the beginning of listener mail
Speaker 1: where we talk about making a movie podcast that I
Speaker 1: now wonder was possibly the seed that Chuck's Movie Crush
Speaker 1: podcast sprouted from. Maybe, which if you like this, go
Speaker 1: listen to the extensive Movie Crush catalog anywhere you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy Welcome
Speaker 1: to Stuff you Should Know, a production of I Heart Radio. Hey,
Speaker 1: and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W.
Speaker 1: Chuck Bryant, A k A. Ciskel, and Ebert save with
Speaker 1: Sea I'll see, and Jerry's over there. I guess she's
Speaker 1: Jeane Shallott. That's that's the stuff. If you should know,
Speaker 1: trium for it. I don't know why that took on
Speaker 1: me so much, because Jeane sell it's a funny looking
Speaker 1: I guess Jerry's not. I'm just picturing her with a
Speaker 1: big afro and a mustache and like a tweed jacket
Speaker 1: and bad opinions about movies. Jane Shell. It had a
Speaker 1: look for sure. Still though he's around right, Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I think so? Yeah, r I p both cisk Lanni,
Speaker 1: but it's so sad. Um. Have you seen the Roger
Speaker 1: Ebert documentary? No, I've heard nothing but good things, really
Speaker 1: really good, very touching. Yeah. What is it? Uh? Something Life,
Speaker 1: Life like Mine, Life with Me, Life on Top, Life Itself,
Speaker 1: Life with thumbs, Life itself, Life itself, Life with thumbs.
Speaker 1: It was really great and I watched it and it
Speaker 1: made the mistake of watching on a plane, and I
Speaker 1: was just like, my allergies are acting up, so yeah,
Speaker 1: oh yeah I was. I was watering because you're allergies. No,
Speaker 1: because it was sad. I was crying. Do you want
Speaker 1: me to say it? Yeah, crying on a plane. I
Speaker 1: was confused there for a second. That's better than when
Speaker 1: I watch other movies that are on my laptop that
Speaker 1: are like like bad violence or or nudity or something.
Speaker 1: I'm always just like, oh, then I kind of lower
Speaker 1: the laptop and it's like I didn't realize this was
Speaker 1: in here, and the lady next to me, he's just
Speaker 1: like you disgusted me. Yeah, because I don't I want
Speaker 1: to be sensitive people around me. You know, I'm not
Speaker 1: one of those jerks just like just lives in my
Speaker 1: own bubble. It's like watching some sex scene on Blane.
Speaker 1: You're like elbowing the lake. So no, I hate it.
Speaker 1: That's it was so embarrassed that happened to me a
Speaker 1: couple of times. I'm like, I needed to start going
Speaker 1: PG on movies like airplanes, Judd Apples. How Am I right?
Speaker 1: He's unpredictable? Yeah? Alright, so Chuck, this is your episode
Speaker 1: to shine Man, is it? Yes, you're a movie guy too.
Speaker 1: Though I like movies, but I've I almost consciously don't
Speaker 1: let myself watch movies on a like a film aficionado
Speaker 1: level kid pure enjoyment. Yeah. I don't never want to
Speaker 1: see the individual shots and just be like, oh, well
Speaker 1: that could have been better whatever, um and and just
Speaker 1: miss the movie as a whole. Yeah. I fall somewhere
Speaker 1: in the middle of that. I try to let go,
Speaker 1: but um like, our our video producer director, Casey Is
Speaker 1: is pretty bad about that, and our Buddy Scotty who
Speaker 1: shot our TV show. He's the worst. He's just a
Speaker 1: camera working. That lighting in that scene's awesome. Hey, Casey,
Speaker 1: they're all in here with this in spirit, and hey,
Speaker 1: this is the last show in the studio. Ye, last
Speaker 1: episode in the old office, the murder Room. Couldn't feel
Speaker 1: more neutral about it. I actually feel less than neutral,
Speaker 1: less than zero. It's it's weird. That was a good movie.
Speaker 1: You great shots. I say thank you as if I
Speaker 1: directed it a lot, right, I not only directed it,
Speaker 1: also played Andrew McCarthy. Uh. Yeah, I'm ready to get
Speaker 1: the heck out of here. Man. I can't wait to
Speaker 1: get in that new office and that it's gonna be good,
Speaker 1: tiny little dedicated studio, whole new world. All right, let's
Speaker 1: do this. Okay, So, Chuck films, you've seen one or
Speaker 1: two of them in your time. Have you seen any
Speaker 1: of the ones in this list? I know you've seen
Speaker 1: a few of them, but have you seen like some
Speaker 1: of the early ones I've seen. Well it we'll just
Speaker 1: go piece by piece because I have not seen Battleship Penkin. Okay, Um,
Speaker 1: but I do love Mandy Patankin. It's a little different
Speaker 1: in spelling pronunciation meaning the whole thing. But it's close,
Speaker 1: I guess. But we're talking, of course about films that
Speaker 1: change filmmaking and somewhere or another, and the first one
Speaker 1: on the list is from Battleship Patankin. That's hard for
Speaker 1: me to say, which is not the first movie, by
Speaker 1: the way. The first screen movie was Workers Leaving the
Speaker 1: Lumier Factory, which is forty seven seconds long. I'm the
Speaker 1: most boring piece of celluloid anyone's ever put together, But
Speaker 1: it was the first, that's right. This was many years.
Speaker 1: That was a full thirty years before Battleship Potempkin. By
Speaker 1: the time thirty years had passed, like we were doing
Speaker 1: like narratives and there was banning and all sorts of
Speaker 1: great stuff, and battleship pretention fell under both of those umbrellas.
Speaker 1: It was a narrative story. It was a silent movie, right,
Speaker 1: but it told a pretty clear story. And it was
Speaker 1: a bit of Russian propaganda as well. Yeah, it tells
Speaker 1: the story of a nineteen o five uprising in uh
Speaker 1: where there were Russian sailors. Basically, there was a mutiny
Speaker 1: aboard a ship and then the bad guys, the Cossacks
Speaker 1: came in looking for revenge. Yeah ninety five, that would
Speaker 1: have been rising up against tyranny, would have been rising
Speaker 1: up against the romanof monarchy, I guess. But it was made.
Speaker 1: So this is a time when you know, Lenin and
Speaker 1: Trotsky and all those dudes were running around trying to
Speaker 1: do the great experiment, and uh it ends up. It
Speaker 1: turns out that the battleship Potempkin was banned in some countries.
Speaker 1: Some countries are like, we don't want this Rusky propaganda, right,
Speaker 1: But Russia itself later on banned it when Stallin came
Speaker 1: to power because he was a self aware dictator. Was
Speaker 1: that the deal? Yeah, okay, he knew this could be
Speaker 1: a metaphor for rising up against my dictatorship. So I'm
Speaker 1: gonna just bay in this. Uh yeah, even though it's
Speaker 1: Russian propaganda. Well, filmatically, I need to bring the history,
Speaker 1: by the way, uh, Filmatically speaking, it was a landmark
Speaker 1: film because of the montage, most notably the Russian or
Speaker 1: Soviet theory of montage, which is basically that, um, your
Speaker 1: impact is going to come from juxtaposition of shots and
Speaker 1: not necessarily smooth sequence of shots. Um, and it should
Speaker 1: be rhythmic instead of necessarily being tied to the story.
Speaker 1: It was like a rhythmic series of shots. And um,
Speaker 1: this one is popular. It was The Odessa Steps sequence
Speaker 1: is one of the five acts, and it is huge
Speaker 1: because it has been aped and um mimicked and mocked
Speaker 1: and um homaged, probably more than I don't know about more,
Speaker 1: but a lot of times in film history. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: the montage it's like a go to editing technique, right,
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, well the montage in general, but specifically the
Speaker 1: Odessa Steps. There are two notable parts in that sequence.
Speaker 1: One is the you know, it's basically a big charge
Speaker 1: on these these grand steps leading up to a building
Speaker 1: in a big battle Odessa, Texas. And um, there's a
Speaker 1: part of it where there's the old the old baby
Speaker 1: carriage going down the steps. You know what's going to
Speaker 1: happen to the baby And it sounds tired because we've
Speaker 1: seen that in uh, you know, The Untouchables. Notably that
Speaker 1: I did not find it tiresome Naked Gun thirty three
Speaker 1: and a third everything is illuminated the great movie by
Speaker 1: leaf Shaw. Ever, um that was from directly from the
Speaker 1: Odessa Step sequence and Battleship Patinkin the Baby Carriage and
Speaker 1: the old um shot through the shot in the eye
Speaker 1: through the glasses. Oh cool, that comes from this movie too.
Speaker 1: They were the first ones to do it. Yeah. Um,
Speaker 1: And you've seen that in Woody Allen's Love and Death
Speaker 1: and Bananas and of course The Godfather. The great sequence
Speaker 1: where Mo Green's getting the massage and he looks up
Speaker 1: and puts on his glasses during a montage. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: exactly the whole Yeah, because there was an assassination on
Speaker 1: the steps as well. Oh yes, that was definitely a
Speaker 1: double Who was that? That was Francis Ford Coppola. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he was clearly aware of battleship attemptin clearly. I was
Speaker 1: trying to think of other examples of montages and the
Speaker 1: only thing I could come up with was the a
Speaker 1: team building something. But that counts as a montage, right, Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's like some related in some way related shots that
Speaker 1: are kind of put together that a little bit transand
Speaker 1: and like a story in itself, like Rocky training for
Speaker 1: a fight. Yeah, that's another good A lot of times
Speaker 1: to set to music. Yeah, I love that. That's the
Speaker 1: only one you can think of. And in the Great
Speaker 1: Movie Brazil too has the shot through the glasses bit
Speaker 1: as I like to call it. So that's a Battleship
Speaker 1: at Tamkins, doesn't one of the Nazis and Raiders have
Speaker 1: lost art gets shot through the glasses. Maybe that wouldn't
Speaker 1: surprise me. It's been it's been off homaged, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So Battleship at Tempkin was a It made a pretty
Speaker 1: big splash in ninety six. The following year, the next
Speaker 1: movie on the list. Um, it wasn't his first, but
Speaker 1: it really solidified I think his stardom Buster Keaton stardom, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the general rightfully so too. Yeah, he was one of
Speaker 1: the great Um well, some people call him the greatest
Speaker 1: stuntman to ever live. He's done some stuff that I
Speaker 1: think earns him that, yeah, because I mean this is
Speaker 1: back in the day two where he was legitimately risking
Speaker 1: his life, you know, like the the very famously where
Speaker 1: he's standing on the street in front of a house
Speaker 1: and then the whole front of the house falls over
Speaker 1: him and the window he just goes right around him.
Speaker 1: I watched that again today. It is I can't believe
Speaker 1: he did that. And there's actually a half of a
Speaker 1: second where his arm jerks up because he startled as
Speaker 1: the house finally makes its way like into his peripheral vision,
Speaker 1: and it has to be one of the most dangerous
Speaker 1: things that human beings ever done on film. I'm sure
Speaker 1: the whole time before that was like, we did the
Speaker 1: math right, he did the math. Do the math again,
Speaker 1: do the math again, Show me the math right, show
Speaker 1: me the math, because that's all it was. It was
Speaker 1: math and measurements. But yeah, he could have been squashed
Speaker 1: and killed very easily, and he had a lot of
Speaker 1: faith in everybody who was pulling off the stunt with him.
Speaker 1: You know, he had to just stand there. That was
Speaker 1: his whole thing is he had to just stand there.
Speaker 1: And his bit was that he um was he played
Speaker 1: it straight constantly. He was a stone faced actor. Yeah, deadpan. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he kind of started that whole thing because his big um.
Speaker 1: I was about to say rival, but I guess um
Speaker 1: just contemporary Charlie Chaplin, while similar in some ways, was
Speaker 1: completely different because Chaplin was constantly mugging for the camera
Speaker 1: and like asking for the audience, uh sympathy, raising his
Speaker 1: eyebrows or yeah, like look what's happening to me? Come on?
Speaker 1: Come on? Whereas Buster Keaton was just he had that
Speaker 1: dead pan look the whole time. Yeah, he would go
Speaker 1: from like a house falling around him to jumping on
Speaker 1: a train or something like that with just the same
Speaker 1: blank facial expression. Yeah. And the reason this is a
Speaker 1: highly influential film the generals because it kind of showcases
Speaker 1: the best of both, um, the the amazing stunts that
Speaker 1: would be mimicked in throughout the years and built upon,
Speaker 1: and then the dead pan style that influenced everyone from
Speaker 1: Obviously Bill Murray is one of the great dead pan
Speaker 1: actors of all time. Like you can count the number
Speaker 1: of time Bill Murray even smiles in a movie on
Speaker 1: like two hands, much less like apes or laughs or anything.
Speaker 1: Michael Sarah's mentioned in here, and I'm like he, I
Speaker 1: think he might have Bill Murray beat as far as
Speaker 1: actor goes. Well. Zach Galfin Akiss is on the list,
Speaker 1: he's super deadpan, um Leslie Nielsen, of course, Amy Poehler.
Speaker 1: I think is a is a woman that's a very
Speaker 1: dead pan has a dead pan style. Jason Schwartzman, Yes,
Speaker 1: but people say this is this all is a direct
Speaker 1: descendant of Buster Keaton's work. Yeah, And if you think
Speaker 1: we're overstating this. Go watch any Buster Keaton movie. You
Speaker 1: will be thrilled and delighted. And if your attention span
Speaker 1: has been shredded to ribbons by the Internet, just go
Speaker 1: on to YouTube and type in Buster Keaton and it'll
Speaker 1: bring up all sorts of um clips of his awesome stunts.
Speaker 1: Pretty great. He will be thrilled in amazed, I promise. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And I think I made a note here by the way,
Speaker 1: that we have a fatty Arbuckle retraction to make. Remember
Speaker 1: when we we called him out as the rapist murderer,
Speaker 1: I didn't say murderer, well, we said rapists at least,
Speaker 1: but we were taken a task by fan he was
Speaker 1: he had, he was acquitted of all that stuff and
Speaker 1: apparently didn't do uh either act and um, his career
Speaker 1: in life and family name were ruined forever. So he
Speaker 1: was evidently done a grave miss justice, and we sort
Speaker 1: of cavalierly just still called him that today. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: need to look into it more, all right, So next
Speaker 1: up we have the Jazz Singer the edition not the
Speaker 1: Neil Diamond one. No, and there was one in between
Speaker 1: two with Danny Thomas. I believe, Um, I like Neil Diamonds.
Speaker 1: It's good. I never saw do you ever see it? No? No,
Speaker 1: it's not bad. Um. But this is the original from
Speaker 1: Alan cross Land, and it is notable because it was
Speaker 1: the first feature link uh movie that was at least
Speaker 1: spoken dialogue. Does that make sense? Yeah, it's totally new. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it wasn't. It wasn't the first talkie because they had
Speaker 1: short films that were talking key's. And there was a
Speaker 1: movie the next year I'm sorry, yeah, called Lights of
Speaker 1: New York that had full spoken dialogue, but the jazz
Speaker 1: singer had a mix of music and spoken dialogue. The
Speaker 1: first big, big daddy feature length film to do so
Speaker 1: right with substantial dialogue, right, Yeah, and they they did
Speaker 1: it in the most roundabout difficult way that you could
Speaker 1: possibly do it, which is too record the audio and
Speaker 1: the soundtrack, both the dialogue and the music, onto vinyl
Speaker 1: records probably wax records really, and then um, the projectionists
Speaker 1: had to sink the record up with the film strip
Speaker 1: so everything was in sync. Yeah. It was a device
Speaker 1: called a Vita phone that Warner Brothers sunk about half
Speaker 1: a million into. Uh. This company called Western Electric who
Speaker 1: invented it, and it was actually physically connected to the
Speaker 1: projector's motor. Um, so they did while they did have
Speaker 1: to sink it. It was it was a physical connection
Speaker 1: between the phonograph player and the projection. Uh real, I guess.
Speaker 1: And it went on to gross three and a half
Speaker 1: million bucks a lot of dough. That's a ton of dough.
Speaker 1: That's like five six million dollars today at least at least,
Speaker 1: but uh, it was ineligible for the Best Picture because
Speaker 1: they were just like, you can't compete with the rest.
Speaker 1: It's not fair, oh wow, because everything else is silent
Speaker 1: and everyone's going to vote for you. So that changed
Speaker 1: the whole game for sure. We will continue on with
Speaker 1: our awesome and engrossing list right after this, So Chuck,
Speaker 1: if you will notice the first three movies in our list,
Speaker 1: the first three films that changed everything happened in twenty seven.
Speaker 1: Things were changing vast they really were. I mean, like
Speaker 1: we buy leaps and bounds. But you can also make
Speaker 1: the case that there was a lot of new ground
Speaker 1: to cover. So just about anybody who did anything new
Speaker 1: that was noteworthy. Yeah, it was a big innovation. Harder
Speaker 1: to innovate these days, it is um And if you'll
Speaker 1: notice on the list. Um, So the earliest ones where
Speaker 1: like technical editing, innovations. Um. Now, starting with Citizen Kane
Speaker 1: from we start to get into innovations and storytelling, which
Speaker 1: is a lot more nuanced than you know, um, doing
Speaker 1: your own stunts or using a montage or something. It's
Speaker 1: it's figuring out how to tell a story in a
Speaker 1: much less linear narrative fashion. And Citizen King was one
Speaker 1: of the early ones to pioneer a non linear narrative
Speaker 1: of Yeah, did you you saw this? Yeah? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: didn't see it until I mean it was probably like
Speaker 1: probably about fifteen years ago, but like way later than
Speaker 1: you would think I would have seen this as a
Speaker 1: big film buff. I saw it in college at a
Speaker 1: in a film class. Yeah. Often. Yeah, if you sign
Speaker 1: up for a film class, you're gonna study Citizen exactly
Speaker 1: pretty much. And I finally found out where Rosebud was.
Speaker 1: Don't ruin it. I won't. But it is a landmark
Speaker 1: film in every way, and it has often been top
Speaker 1: of best Films of All Time lists for great reasons, UM,
Speaker 1: one of which, like you said, the non linear narrative
Speaker 1: was really unique thing at the time. UM. Although Flashback
Speaker 1: wasn't brand new it was the first time it had
Speaker 1: been this extensive and effective in the story because I
Speaker 1: mean it's substantial enough that it really cuts up the flow. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, it's not like a quick flashback and they
Speaker 1: come back and the actor is like staring off into
Speaker 1: space to transition back into the present again. I mean
Speaker 1: like it was all over the place. Yeah. Uh. Some
Speaker 1: of the more concrete cinematic landmarks. One was using deep focus. Uh.
Speaker 1: Director of photography Greg Toland Legend used he had used
Speaker 1: deep focus before on a movie called Long Voyage Home,
Speaker 1: But um, it's all over the place in Citizen Kane.
Speaker 1: And that basically means if you see a shot where
Speaker 1: something very far away is in focus in the shot,
Speaker 1: basically where everything is in focus, or the background in
Speaker 1: the foreground or in focus, so you can press pause
Speaker 1: and look around exactly like you're sticking your head into
Speaker 1: a box. Yeah, that's called deep focus. And it was
Speaker 1: brand new. Uh, as far as Citizen Kane goes. It's
Speaker 1: how extensive it used it. One of the other things
Speaker 1: was off center framing. Um it was a big, you know,
Speaker 1: pretty common thing to just center whatever the main act was,
Speaker 1: either the character or the object, and um, Citizen Kane
Speaker 1: had a lot of things where the main focus of
Speaker 1: the scene the character, maybe even off screen, which was
Speaker 1: really weird at the time. People didn't know what to
Speaker 1: think of it. Um expressionistic lighting. Uh back then everything
Speaker 1: that they just lit it there, like make sure everything's
Speaker 1: well lit. Um. But auto premature also like a big
Speaker 1: pioneer with that. Yeah, I think so with um Dalin
Speaker 1: for Murder, I think he directed that. Was that Hitchcock?
Speaker 1: I think that was Hitchcock? Was it? Okay? Well, auto
Speaker 1: premature directed stuff like that, though right he was. He
Speaker 1: used moody lighting and shadows and stuff a lot. I
Speaker 1: probably messed that up. People are going to be Dalin
Speaker 1: for murder. I think it was premature, okay, Um, but
Speaker 1: U orson Welles of course. I don't think we even
Speaker 1: mentioned that who wrote, directed, and started and produced, and
Speaker 1: I think he even edited A Citizen Kane. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: just assumed everybody knew that, you know. Yeah. Um. He
Speaker 1: came from the theater, where uh you create mood with
Speaker 1: lighting only certain parts of the stage, so he brought
Speaker 1: that into the movies and uh it was very um
Speaker 1: evocative and set the mood well. And people are like, man,
Speaker 1: why are we lighting everything all bright all the time?
Speaker 1: Look at Citizen Kane, which really worked. Um. A couple
Speaker 1: of other things, one of which I know you will appreciate, sir,
Speaker 1: is that he pretty much invented the wipe. Oh, the
Speaker 1: star wipe, not the star wipe, but it followed. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the star wipe followed, which I know is your favorite
Speaker 1: transition in cinema. Oh, it's all Star wars Star because
Speaker 1: it almost makes a beop sound, you know. Uh. And
Speaker 1: one of the way, I want to say, you're right, Dallan.
Speaker 1: For murder, it was Hitchcock. Okay, what was premature? Did
Speaker 1: you look that up? He did one called Laura the
Speaker 1: Man with the Golden Arm. It's not who I'm thinking of.
Speaker 1: I'm thinking of a director named Auto who directed in
Speaker 1: like the twenties or thirties, and he directed like moody um,
Speaker 1: like like moody movies like yeah, murder movies, yeah, filmore, yes,
Speaker 1: film noir. That's exactly what I was going for. And
Speaker 1: I don't remember who it was. Maybe his name is
Speaker 1: Otto film Moore, He's French. Um. And then one final thing,
Speaker 1: of course, that you could study Citizen Kane for a
Speaker 1: week in the film class. So this is an overview.
Speaker 1: But um, the low angle shots. Um, people didn't use
Speaker 1: a lot of low er high angle shots back then.
Speaker 1: It was kind of just shot from straight on and
Speaker 1: um Orson Welles even dugout cut out the floor a
Speaker 1: lot of times to get the camera lower. And for
Speaker 1: the first time we saw ceilings in view in a
Speaker 1: movie because quite often things were shot on a sound
Speaker 1: stage where you don't have ceilings, and um, he wanted
Speaker 1: those low angle shots, so they used um fabric most
Speaker 1: times to act as a ceiling, but very effective shots
Speaker 1: of from below of orson Wells. As I mean, it
Speaker 1: wasn't exactly William Randolph first, but it was an approximation
Speaker 1: of William Randolph first, a very effective low angle stuff
Speaker 1: that now, I mean we take for granted all these things, Um,
Speaker 1: but you know, there would be no pulp fiction and
Speaker 1: that non linear storytelling if there was no well maybe
Speaker 1: somebody would have done it, but maybe eventually. But the
Speaker 1: first he did the first, and and that's why it
Speaker 1: was innovative. Exactly. It's Fritz Lang. Yeah, there you go,
Speaker 1: Fritz Lang Metropolis and m just um, that's okay, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's all making sense that get confused. Yeah, but you
Speaker 1: were right, You were right there. Fritz and Auto are
Speaker 1: not close. I mean they're both Jerreman, but that's about it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but do you know the difference between M and dial M?
Speaker 1: Just a telephone? What's up next, Chuck Breathless? One of
Speaker 1: my faiths. So I am going to rely on you
Speaker 1: mostly for this one because I looked up what the
Speaker 1: French New Wave really did, what did accounted for? And
Speaker 1: like all of the essays I found were are they
Speaker 1: were dense, Yeah, and I didn't really understand. I understood
Speaker 1: that the French New Wave like changed everything, yea, and
Speaker 1: that a lot of the movies that I know and
Speaker 1: love today are the offspring of the French New Wave,
Speaker 1: but I still didn't get exactly specifically what the French
Speaker 1: New Wave did. And you're going to rely on me
Speaker 1: to summarize this, no pressure. Well, for me, the French
Speaker 1: New Wave basically ushered in an era of what now
Speaker 1: I think most people might associate with in d filmmaking Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: like uh, handheld camera work and what some people at
Speaker 1: the time considered amateurish camera work. UM movies where maybe
Speaker 1: not a lot seemingly happens you know, nothing grant happens,
Speaker 1: which was the case in Breathless. A lot of people
Speaker 1: didn't like it at the time because it was like,
Speaker 1: you know, not much happens. You know that the the
Speaker 1: two leads in the movie, uh, Jean Paul Belmondo and
Speaker 1: Jean c. Berg weren't really lie didn't show express a
Speaker 1: whole lot of deep love, and there weren't these big
Speaker 1: moments of love and affection and these huge action sequences.
Speaker 1: And it was described as flat by a lot of people. Um,
Speaker 1: and I think a lot of indie movies do that,
Speaker 1: just kind of show life as it happens. Yeah, So
Speaker 1: without Breathless, we wouldn't have like Bottle Rocket. Maybe. Wes
Speaker 1: Anderson is definitely a big French New wave guy for sure. Um,
Speaker 1: but uh go dar John Luc Goodard who directed it,
Speaker 1: and Trufaux and some other um French New wave forefathers
Speaker 1: were film critics at first. Yeah. Yeah, and they decided
Speaker 1: as a group like we want to look at cinnam
Speaker 1: in a new way, um and do something different. So
Speaker 1: they would and started making their own movies. That's like
Speaker 1: James Fenimore Cooper, Yeah, the guy who wrote Less of
Speaker 1: the Mohicans. Yeah. He apparently used to complain that, like
Speaker 1: nobody wrote good books anymore, and so I think his
Speaker 1: wife or something said, well, why don't you do a
Speaker 1: big shot? And he did. And the books he wrote
Speaker 1: really weren't so great, but he he went and wrote
Speaker 1: him and he wrote a bunch of them too. One
Speaker 1: of my favorite four sides ever, is the second to
Speaker 1: the last of the Mohicans. It's just a line of
Speaker 1: Native Americans. In the second to the last one, they're
Speaker 1: online facing away. He just sort of turning around and
Speaker 1: waving at the camera, I guess the camera at Gary
Speaker 1: Larson's hand. Um. So Breathless is notable for those reasons.
Speaker 1: It kind of kicked off the French New Wave. But
Speaker 1: the use of jump cut editing, which we see so
Speaker 1: much now. It was the first movie and it was
Speaker 1: very jarring at the time to see jump cuts in
Speaker 1: a movie. And that's when you're showing, like, I guess
Speaker 1: the best way to describe it as um, multiple shots
Speaker 1: of the same subject or thing from different angles. Right,
Speaker 1: It's like, um, you indicate the progression of time or
Speaker 1: movement or something by just cutting quickly rather than focusing
Speaker 1: on somebody walking down the street for five minutes. You
Speaker 1: cut a couple of times, and all of a sudden
Speaker 1: they're just closer to the camera, and then closer and closer,
Speaker 1: and then they're past the camera. It's a jump cut, yeah,
Speaker 1: or even as simple. Something as simple is like you're
Speaker 1: going to leave the house, so you go and pick
Speaker 1: up your keys and you put on your coat. Instead
Speaker 1: of showing all that you come out of the bedroom, Boom,
Speaker 1: you're putting on your coat. Boom, you're putting the keys
Speaker 1: in the door, right exactly, you're just showing the high
Speaker 1: highlights of this progression of stuff, where that would otherwise
Speaker 1: be boring to watch the whole thing. But it also
Speaker 1: um is used to create tension too, because it's it's
Speaker 1: um jarring. I guess it's probably why it creates tension.
Speaker 1: And Scorsese famously used it in Goodfellas at the end
Speaker 1: when Henry Hill is like like trying to sell some guns. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's coat to the gills, right, and he's like trying
Speaker 1: to sell some guns to Nero but they don't fit
Speaker 1: the silencers, and like he's the helicopters following him. He's
Speaker 1: got the sauce going and all this stuff is being
Speaker 1: represented and compressed in a very short amount of time
Speaker 1: by the use of jump cuts. Very effective and for
Speaker 1: budding filmmakers, it's a great way to hide mistakes. UM
Speaker 1: of things you may not have gotten that you thought
Speaker 1: you got. UM. Jump cutting is a really easy way
Speaker 1: to to just sort of uh yeah, to hide your errors.
Speaker 1: I did a lot. In other words, when I was
Speaker 1: making those shorts, I UM, I was. I realized that
Speaker 1: in my head I was referencing the UM shot in
Speaker 1: Soul Taker. Have you seen that mystery signs three thousand
Speaker 1: with it's um. His last name is Estevez is Martin
Speaker 1: Sheen's brother, and he is a soul taker and he's
Speaker 1: next to this guy who's a soul taker. You just
Speaker 1: have to see this. But anyway, they're they're walking down
Speaker 1: the road and this jump cut like has this progression
Speaker 1: of them. It's so unnecessary, but it's like a great
Speaker 1: use of jump cut. You could tell the director was like,
Speaker 1: I can't wait to use a jump cut, and that's
Speaker 1: what she did. She used it on UM. But go
Speaker 1: watch the MSc three K. It's a good one. Man.
Speaker 1: You did you see every single one of those episodes? No,
Speaker 1: it's still I still run across the ones that I
Speaker 1: haven't seen. Yeah, nice, um hey, and the shout out
Speaker 1: to Bill Corbett, who I know as a listener. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: he isn't. Yeah. I don't know if he's gonna hear
Speaker 1: this one, but the great Bill Corbett, so take care. Uh. Next,
Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to Federico Fellini's eight and a half.
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen this one? No? I haven't. Now
Speaker 1: I understand why it's called that. Yeah. It was one
Speaker 1: of the first, although not the first, movies about movie
Speaker 1: making and uh, starring the great Marcello Mastriani Masterroianni from
Speaker 1: Ludulta Vita. Amuse of Felini's over the years too, And
Speaker 1: this one, Um, this one really kicked off the surrealist
Speaker 1: filmmaking and sort of saying you can play around and
Speaker 1: shoot a dream sequence where the guys in traffic and
Speaker 1: then he leaves his car and floats up in the
Speaker 1: air and is you know, being pulled down to the
Speaker 1: ground on the beach from a rope tied around his ankle,
Speaker 1: just like go nuts. Yeah, and successive filmmakers did go
Speaker 1: nuts like um Gondry did. Uh eternal sunch out of
Speaker 1: the Spotless Mine. Oh yeah, he's hugely influenced. Um, Darren
Speaker 1: Aronofsky did some weird stuff here there, Yeah, David Lynch
Speaker 1: and Terry Gilliam. Of course. Just basically surrealism is is
Speaker 1: what I'm taking Felini introduced into this, Yeah, for real.
Speaker 1: And um, besides the surrealism, uh, that opening sequence of
Speaker 1: eight and a half where the director of um, he's
Speaker 1: the director in the movie, Uh, Guido is stuck in traffic.
Speaker 1: It's really claustrophobic feeling, and that's why he floats away,
Speaker 1: uh and escapes. You know that, that traffic jam. But
Speaker 1: that was directly mimicked in like R E. M S.
Speaker 1: Everybody Hurts video, And Um, the beginning of the movie
Speaker 1: Falling Down. Do you remember that that started with the
Speaker 1: traffic jam. Michael Douglas just laughed. He doesn't float, he
Speaker 1: gets I saw that again the other day. Most of
Speaker 1: it it's weird. It alternately felt way ahead of its
Speaker 1: time and also very dated. Yeah, because the stuff that
Speaker 1: Michael Douglas is doing felt way ahead of its time.
Speaker 1: But then there was I just forgot about that whole
Speaker 1: um weird subplots with Robert Duval retiring and he had
Speaker 1: this wife that was him pecking them, and like this
Speaker 1: retirement party they were trying to throw off. Forgot that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was just so unnecessary and felt really weird and
Speaker 1: out of place. The other day when I was watching
Speaker 1: it was there like a jump cut montage where he's
Speaker 1: putting on his watch, his gold retirement watch. No, but
Speaker 1: then to the Barbara Hershey, you know, is in venice
Speaker 1: at home with the daughter, and he spends a whole
Speaker 1: day coming there to grab them basically, and the whole
Speaker 1: time she just keeps calling the cops like a no,
Speaker 1: he's coming, and no, he's coming. And I was watching
Speaker 1: the other day, I was like, freaking leave, what are
Speaker 1: you doing there? That's a movie character thing, you know.
Speaker 1: That's just bad writing, bad directing. When you just walk
Speaker 1: right past the ability to leave, there's you. You missed
Speaker 1: a huge step. Where were we falling down? Yeah? I
Speaker 1: think that pretty much sums up eight and a half.
Speaker 1: I think so too, falling down boom, so chuck. We
Speaker 1: got a little more left, we got more films. Is
Speaker 1: this making you want to watch films? Yeah? Me too.
Speaker 1: I feel like eating ice cream watching a film and
Speaker 1: scratching from poison Ivy lately and burning this office down.
Speaker 1: Uh you know if that happens now, suspicion is going
Speaker 1: to fall on you for saying that's all right. Uh,
Speaker 1: we'll be right back after this. Alright, So we're back
Speaker 1: with our awesome jingles, which, by the way, um, we
Speaker 1: we have to thank John bagonin John begin begin to begin.
Speaker 1: He even emailed with the pronunciation of his name, but he, um,
Speaker 1: the original guy who did our jingle, the first jingle ever,
Speaker 1: Rusty Maddius Mattias Man, I'm not good with the pronunciation.
Speaker 1: Uh well, anyway, Rusty who's banned the sheep Dogs are
Speaker 1: on tour right now. Um, just because his work was
Speaker 1: so original, we contacted him and said, hey, we got
Speaker 1: this other guy who's done like covers of your work.
Speaker 1: Can we use these is like totally and John's been
Speaker 1: making awesome like versions of it ever since. Yeah, they're
Speaker 1: both great and talented. Thanks to you both. And go
Speaker 1: check out I think that what you say. They're on
Speaker 1: tour right yeah, the sheep Dogs. Go check out the
Speaker 1: sheep Dogs in town here you Yeah, all right, let's
Speaker 1: finish with these two in reverse order. Okay. Toy story
Speaker 1: was a big one, hugely innovative, huge, And again it's
Speaker 1: one of those things where now almost everything about it
Speaker 1: seems pedestrian or what it did. See. It's still a
Speaker 1: great movie, I'm sure, um, but the innovations that it
Speaker 1: undertook her it's just seemed pedestrian. But at the time
Speaker 1: it was totally groundbreaking. It was the first, um, the
Speaker 1: first c g I movie, all c g I movie ever. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was enormous. Well yeah, and I remember at the
Speaker 1: time seeing it and just being like, Wow, this is
Speaker 1: the future of animated films. What's the best all c
Speaker 1: g I animated film you've ever seen? Visually? Uh? Well,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen a lot of them these days because
Speaker 1: Emily doesn't like those. So I probably wouldn't be the
Speaker 1: best person to ask Holly from stuff mom or sophiasts
Speaker 1: and history class, she'd probably be the one to ask
Speaker 1: for my money. Have you seen The Adventures of Tintin? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was amazing, mind blow. Yeah. I saw that on
Speaker 1: your recommendation and really really liked it. Yeah. The story
Speaker 1: was great, the action was great, the characters were great.
Speaker 1: But the c g I, the computer animation is but
Speaker 1: I think possibly the best ever done. Yeah, And that's
Speaker 1: a bit of a different style than say like UP
Speaker 1: or Um The Incredible. It's not nearly his cartoons. It's
Speaker 1: like the I think it's the motion capture. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think that's what they did for that. Oh yeah, with
Speaker 1: UP it would strictly be totally just animation, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: but I mean they're both animation. Um. But yeah, man, Tinton,
Speaker 1: that was really good. It was good. I'm surprised how
Speaker 1: much I like that. But UP was good too, and
Speaker 1: Toy Story was good too. And but all of these
Speaker 1: things came as a result of the ground that Toy
Speaker 1: Story broke absolutely in Um, like you said, what seems
Speaker 1: like a common thing today, could I mean, you don't
Speaker 1: see sell animation anymore. It's almost I know, I kind
Speaker 1: of miss it. I totally miss like the new Um,
Speaker 1: Mickey Mouse is all weird and CG like stuff from
Speaker 1: our generation should have just been discontinued, and then you
Speaker 1: just come up with all new stuff off that's CG.
Speaker 1: I start very shortcake not supposed to be c G.
Speaker 1: I it just all looks weird now. Yeah, I wish
Speaker 1: there would have people would have done a little bit
Speaker 1: of both still, because I think Sell animation like Uh.
Speaker 1: I think The Iron Giant came out after Toy Story
Speaker 1: and they did sell animation and that was great, great
Speaker 1: movie that it was really good, you'd like it. Uh
Speaker 1: Like it was a movie for grown ups, and Toy
Speaker 1: Story sort of laid the way for that because it
Speaker 1: was one of the first movies. Um, I guess cartoony
Speaker 1: kids movies to really have a lot of dialogue that
Speaker 1: flew over kids heads that adults got a little nod
Speaker 1: in a wink. What Toy Story. Yeah, yeah, not like
Speaker 1: dirty humor, but it's not like f it's the cat
Speaker 1: no no no, but a little entendre here and there
Speaker 1: that adults might appreciate that kids won't understand. Those are
Speaker 1: the best jokes. Um. And now we have you know,
Speaker 1: best animated uh feature in the Oscars, which definitely came
Speaker 1: straight out of the original Toy Sto worry because movies
Speaker 1: started being considered before they created its own category up
Speaker 1: in Toy Story. Three were actually nominated for a regular
Speaker 1: Best Picture, and I think everyone's like, oh, we need
Speaker 1: to get in their own category because you can't have
Speaker 1: an animated movie when best Picture it came well up
Speaker 1: would have come after. Um, the the best Animated Picture
Speaker 1: category came out, really, so that kind of goes as
Speaker 1: a testament to just how amazing that movie is. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but it was still for Best Picture. Oh, it was both.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it was up for it probably
Speaker 1: was up for Best Animated as well, but it was
Speaker 1: definitely also up for Best Picture while there was an
Speaker 1: animated category. Yeah, I never considered that. Bam, that was
Speaker 1: a good movie. Yeah, it was sweet. Um, so I
Speaker 1: got nothing else in toy Story. Well then what about
Speaker 1: the last one? Yeah, two thousand one Space Odyssey quite
Speaker 1: a film. You sent this, uh essay on Criterion I
Speaker 1: think Criterion dot com, but you know the criteria in collection.
Speaker 1: Um it was written, I guess in even though it
Speaker 1: says posted in it's like there wasn't an internet to
Speaker 1: post it on in night. Maybe it means posted it
Speaker 1: like in the mail. Maybe. Um. But I realized, like
Speaker 1: I can read film essays about Stanley Kubrick's work all
Speaker 1: day long, Like I love that documentary Room two to
Speaker 1: seven two three seven six seven, you know the one
Speaker 1: about the shining conspiracy theory. Yeah, then the number of
Speaker 1: the room is amazing. I can't remember though. Um, I
Speaker 1: read a bunch of articles is I think two thirty seven. Um,
Speaker 1: I read a bunch of articles around the release of
Speaker 1: that documentary, which we're basically like film essays on on
Speaker 1: the shining. I read this one amazing one um from
Speaker 1: several years ago about Eyes Wide Shut about how it's
Speaker 1: like a masterpiece of sociology, studying sociology. People hate that movie. Um.
Speaker 1: And then now this like two thousand one. I'm sure
Speaker 1: there's tons out there to consume, but I can just
Speaker 1: read that stuff all day long because that guy was
Speaker 1: so just amazingly detailed as a director. Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 1: I can read more about his work critical essays on
Speaker 1: his work than any other director. It's just unbelievable. It's
Speaker 1: almost like its genre. It is, you know rick. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's got a word named after it, and well it should. Um.
Speaker 1: So two thousand one of Space Odyssey, Um, blue minds
Speaker 1: back then, blows minds today one for its uh just
Speaker 1: the amazing look and the technical achievement. Um. A eight
Speaker 1: is really well. I mean, if you see a movie
Speaker 1: from nine about out of Space, it still looks like
Speaker 1: the future. Yeah, he don't expect it to hold up well,
Speaker 1: but it totally does. Um so much so that a
Speaker 1: lot of the you know, George Lucas and Ridley Scott
Speaker 1: were just like it's done, Like we might as well
Speaker 1: give up. Yeah, George Lucas when Star Wars came out
Speaker 1: said Star Wars is technically comparable, but for my money,
Speaker 1: two thousand one was by far the better movie. Yeah,
Speaker 1: everyone was sort of intimidated, I think by how talented
Speaker 1: Kubrick was. Well. Plus also, um, you have to take
Speaker 1: into account that he made this movie at a time
Speaker 1: when other sci fi movies were just pure schlock. So
Speaker 1: not only to make the movie in this way this
Speaker 1: visually amazing and amazing with an audio soundtrack and just
Speaker 1: totally innovative, it also took like that mindset. It is
Speaker 1: completely go in a different direction that everybody else has
Speaker 1: as well. Yeah, of course I think about Ridley Scott
Speaker 1: saying that, and then he goes on to make Alien
Speaker 1: and Blade Runner after that. So I mean he helped Prometheus. Man. Yeah,
Speaker 1: people are like Prometheus. I don't care. It's a cool movie. No,
Speaker 1: I liked it too. I thought, Okay, one flaw, the
Speaker 1: big flaw to me was and I'm sure it's like
Speaker 1: part of the subtext, the context, or one of the texts,
Speaker 1: but um, the engineer coming back to life or coming
Speaker 1: out of hibernation after however long and just immediately like
Speaker 1: inflicting violence on these p brained humans who are showing
Speaker 1: him no threat whatsoever. I just thought it was a little, uh,
Speaker 1: it wasn't explained well enough for my taste. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't think I agree with you, But when I'm watching
Speaker 1: a Ridley Scott movie, I just assume if I'm missing something,
Speaker 1: he has an explanation for it. I'm just not catching it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know what you mean. I'd like I think I
Speaker 1: read some stuff about how it tied into the alien
Speaker 1: cannon and realized I need to go see it again
Speaker 1: with all this knowledge that I wasn't really thinking about,
Speaker 1: and maybe i'd like it more. Yeah, but I haven't
Speaker 1: done that yet, So back to two thousand one. It
Speaker 1: was also notable for being bookended basically with thirty minutes
Speaker 1: of silence on both ends of the movie. The first
Speaker 1: thirty minutes or and when I say silent, I mean
Speaker 1: no dialogue in the last thirty minutes have no dialogue. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the last line comes like a full thirty minutes before
Speaker 1: the end. Yeah, and over the hundred and forty six minutes.
Speaker 1: There are only forty minutes of dialogue and the whole thing.
Speaker 1: And um, that's why I just when people compare something
Speaker 1: like Interstellar and call it kubricky in, I just want
Speaker 1: to smash do you know like Interstellar? Not really? Oh,
Speaker 1: I liked it. I was super let down despite McConaughey
Speaker 1: doing Waterson in the future. I still liked it. I
Speaker 1: even liked him in it. I liked a lot of
Speaker 1: the parts of it. But um, to me, it's anti
Speaker 1: kubricky in because every ten minutes they're explaining everything that's
Speaker 1: going on again another thing. Just like Inception, Ellen Page's
Speaker 1: entire character was written in to explain what was going
Speaker 1: on every ten minutes. Yeah, and I felt like Interstellar
Speaker 1: was the same way. It's like Christopher Nolan needs to
Speaker 1: just trust his audience a little bit like kubrick did
Speaker 1: and say figure it out or don't. Yeah that I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna stop every ten minutes just to explain everything.
Speaker 1: Here's just going on. Remember if you didn't get it right,
Speaker 1: here's what's going on again. Well, I think if they
Speaker 1: are labeling something like Interstellar, is Kubrickian right, one of
Speaker 1: the ways that you can interpret that is that he
Speaker 1: was he rooted his two thousand one in science fact right,
Speaker 1: So like the stuff that the astronauts are like dealing
Speaker 1: with and the things that are going on and the
Speaker 1: conditions of space, it was all factual. Whereas with Interstellar,
Speaker 1: same thing. They went to really great lengths to do
Speaker 1: what they could to make everything scientifically factual. Aside from
Speaker 1: the fact that the idea that you could go into
Speaker 1: a black hole and then come back out or something
Speaker 1: like that drifting in space, that's not gonna happen. But
Speaker 1: for the most part, Interstellar was scientifically accurate. So maybe
Speaker 1: that's what they meant when they called it Kubrickian, because
Speaker 1: you're absolutely right, like they did blaming a lot and
Speaker 1: went to great links to explain a lot, whereas with
Speaker 1: with two thousand one, you just watch it the first
Speaker 1: five times like what just happened? Yeah, And apparently Carry
Speaker 1: Grant had that same reaction as well. That was rock Hudson,
Speaker 1: Rock Hudson, that's right. Yeah, the original screening that Roger
Speaker 1: Ebert was at in l A. Rock Hudson just left
Speaker 1: and said, can somebody tell me what the hell that
Speaker 1: was about? Yeah? And it wasn't even over yet. Yeah. Um.
Speaker 1: Well the reason it it uh has science fact and
Speaker 1: not science fiction is because Kubrick and Arthur C. Clark,
Speaker 1: who it wasn't actually a book that was made into
Speaker 1: a movie. It was a movie B book made after
Speaker 1: a movie, and they collaborated on both. And um, they
Speaker 1: went to Carl Sagan, um of course of Cosmos and
Speaker 1: said he said, you're gonna make billions and billions. That
Speaker 1: was pretty good, it wasn't. Yeah, that's a lot like them. Um.
Speaker 1: They went to Carl Sagan said, hey, we want to
Speaker 1: portray these extraterrestrials. Are they maybe the Star Child is uh?
Speaker 1: Or they turned Dave into the Star Child? Are they humanoids?
Speaker 1: What are they gonna look like? And Sagan was like
Speaker 1: they were very unlikely to be humanoid. So Kubrick did
Speaker 1: the smart thing and was just like, well, we just
Speaker 1: won't show him at all, instead of making a fool
Speaker 1: of myself like signs and making some dumb looking at man, man,
Speaker 1: let me just not show the aliens. Very smart move. Um.
Speaker 1: Getting back to the story of two thousand one, although
Speaker 1: I think the Village is underrated, Yeah I can stomach
Speaker 1: that one. What about well, you like the six cents, right,
Speaker 1: everybody like the sixth Cents. I guess that was it
Speaker 1: for him. I loved Unbreakable. Unbreakable that was one where like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think it was maybe even better the second time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I still like that movie. Uh. But then he also
Speaker 1: made that Lady in the Water movie and the the
Speaker 1: one with Marky Mark the people were jumping off no
Speaker 1: three kings. Uh is it the one in the elevator? No,
Speaker 1: he just produced Oh I know what you're talking about,
Speaker 1: the one where people like jumping off of buildings and
Speaker 1: stuff inexplicably. Yeah. That I didn't even I didn't see that.
Speaker 1: You couldn't get through ten minutes of that movie. So um.
Speaker 1: Two thousand one Back to Good Movies was had a
Speaker 1: three x three part structure, but not a conventional three
Speaker 1: act structure that you might be used to in movies,
Speaker 1: which is why it confounded people like Rock Hudson. The
Speaker 1: first they called the movements. The first movement was the
Speaker 1: Dawn of Man sequence with the the the apes with
Speaker 1: a monolith um and uh, he has that great part
Speaker 1: where he throws his little bone tool up in the
Speaker 1: air and then it morphs into well not Morse but
Speaker 1: maybe it's a dissolve into the spinning and outer space.
Speaker 1: It's called the match cut. Yeah, match cut and um
Speaker 1: of the rotation of what we now know was a
Speaker 1: nuclear warhead. Because I read that little article twenty Things
Speaker 1: you Didn't Know about two thousand one, I didn't know
Speaker 1: those are nuclear warheads necessarily in outer space. They made
Speaker 1: it a little more vague, and initially it was going
Speaker 1: to be more explicit and they were going to explode
Speaker 1: it in outer space. But he said, now it's a
Speaker 1: little too close to uh, the ending of strange. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so let's not do that. Yeah, probably a good choice, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but some as a result, some people have taken it
Speaker 1: to mean that, like it was a That match cut
Speaker 1: was supposed to show how far humans have come from
Speaker 1: using a bone to murder somebody to satellites in space.
Speaker 1: But if you know that the satellite is actually loaded
Speaker 1: down with nuclear warheads, that match cut demonstrates how little
Speaker 1: humans have changed from using a bone to murder somebody
Speaker 1: to using satellites to murder somebody. The the motif is
Speaker 1: still the same, and it's murder. Yeah. He was going
Speaker 1: for some deep things. Oh yeah, a lot of metaphor happening.
Speaker 1: I mean supposedly in every single shot, because he started
Speaker 1: out as a still photographer, right, supposedly every frame of
Speaker 1: a Kubrick movie. You there is nothing that isn't unintentional
Speaker 1: in place there by him. He did a lot of
Speaker 1: his own set decorating. Yeah, Like the pencil holder on
Speaker 1: the desk in the office of the guy at the
Speaker 1: Shining Hotel was where it's supposed to be, right, and
Speaker 1: if like if it has like a picture of a
Speaker 1: goat head inscribed on it, that means something. It's not accidental. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Although I will say Room two thirty seven, which I
Speaker 1: think may have been the point, is a little bit
Speaker 1: like these people are crazy, not like, oh man, I
Speaker 1: just see what they're saying in all this, right, I
Speaker 1: was just thinking, these people are nuts, right, It's it
Speaker 1: was just kind of enjoyable to hear their interpretations of
Speaker 1: it well, and I think it had a It was
Speaker 1: a comment on obsession and fandom more so than the
Speaker 1: Shining but there I thought there some of their ideas
Speaker 1: were interesting. I said Room to two sid didn't I
Speaker 1: like going out with conspiracy theorists like Mary. Wasn't Room
Speaker 1: two two seven like a sitcom? Yeah. It was just
Speaker 1: called to seven. Okat. Remember was Jack k She'd be like, Mary, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's what my impression was. What do you think I
Speaker 1: was doing? Well? I wasn't sure what. You must be
Speaker 1: a weirdo. Yeah, okay. The second movement was, of course
Speaker 1: the house sequence, the computer, the how was it? The
Speaker 1: How nine thousand um really creepy and How ended up
Speaker 1: being a lot of people's favorite character, even though it
Speaker 1: was just a voice the supercomputer on the Discovery ship. Remember,
Speaker 1: he's like, what are you doing to you? It's so creepy.
Speaker 1: I had the Mad Magazine spoof of two thousand one
Speaker 1: when I was a kid. It was great. And then
Speaker 1: the third movement is when Dave moves on to the
Speaker 1: next stage of human development with these extraterrestrials that you
Speaker 1: know only here and um. Basically, it's when it comes
Speaker 1: full circle the third movement, and the third movement is
Speaker 1: the one that has almost well, it's really just the
Speaker 1: second movement. That's it's dialogue. Yeah yeah. Uh. Some of
Speaker 1: the alternate titles for two thousand one Journey Beyond the Stars,
Speaker 1: Terrible Universe, not bad, Tunnel to the Stars, not so great,
Speaker 1: Planet Fall, that sounds bad. It sounds like good James
Speaker 1: Pond movie. And then how the Solar System was one
Speaker 1: as a play on how the West was one, Yeah,
Speaker 1: which like movie geeks would find that appealing, but everybody
Speaker 1: else would say that's dumb. He ruined everything, Yeah, and
Speaker 1: Kubrick was this is the last thing I have. He
Speaker 1: was so obsessive with protecting his material that he allegedly, uh,
Speaker 1: I don't think allegedly. I think he did have all
Speaker 1: the sets and props and miniatures destroyed after he shot
Speaker 1: it so they would never be reused, which is a
Speaker 1: common thing at the time, like, hey, we're doing a
Speaker 1: space movie, go get the go get that space from
Speaker 1: Stanley set. Yeah, let's reuse it for a planet fall.
Speaker 1: He he also destroyed all of the footage that didn't
Speaker 1: make it into the original theatrical release. Yeah, destroyed it's gone. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so they wouldn't one day after his death recut it,
Speaker 1: which they invariably probably would have done. Yep, he's a
Speaker 1: smart man. Yeah, I could. We should just do a
Speaker 1: podcast on Kubrick. Okay, he was I'm down for that challenge.
Speaker 1: Be a dude, Yes, one of my heroes. Yeah, cinematically,
Speaker 1: you got anything else? I got nothing else. Uh. If
Speaker 1: you want to know more about movies, if you like
Speaker 1: this one, you probably also love our exploitation episode exploitation
Speaker 1: movie episode fun one. What else have we talked about
Speaker 1: movies in Cannonball Run? Oh yeah, I had a lot
Speaker 1: to do with the movie. Yeah. Our James Bonda episode. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah. We've had a few of these, and people
Speaker 1: always respond to these, were like, you guys should have
Speaker 1: a spin off, should do an all movie podcast maybe
Speaker 1: one day. May remember if you're confront any of these,
Speaker 1: UM press control F or Apple F in your web
Speaker 1: browser and search that way on our podcast archive page. Uh.
Speaker 1: You can also search for this article on how stuff
Speaker 1: works by typing movies in and seeing what comes up.
Speaker 1: And since I said how stuff works, is time for
Speaker 1: a listener mail. I'm gonna call this Mike. Could DuPont
Speaker 1: really clear something up for us on scientific method? Hey guys,
Speaker 1: it was a great um Well, actually he doesn't say
Speaker 1: it was great. I think I just made that up.
Speaker 1: Hey guys, your Scientific Method podcast has a consistent misuse
Speaker 1: of what a scientific law is in relation to uh,
Speaker 1: to the working of the scientific method. Uh. It appears
Speaker 1: that you believe that a law e g. Newton's law
Speaker 1: of gravity isn't held uh in higher esteem than theory,
Speaker 1: and that eventually a theory matures into a law. Um.
Speaker 1: I think I probably did think that because of politics,
Speaker 1: you know, bill becomes a law right exactly, he says,
Speaker 1: when in fact, theory is considerably more robust than a law.
Speaker 1: A law is a mathematical model that describes observed behavior,
Speaker 1: does not answer the why. Theory does answer why something happens.
Speaker 1: Did we not say that? I thought we did, Like
Speaker 1: I I knew that. I remember finding that out from
Speaker 1: the research. I just can't believe it didn't come out
Speaker 1: of my mouth. He claims, we did not, and I
Speaker 1: I feel like I'm learning this So I definitely did not.
Speaker 1: But you may have. For example, Newton's law of gravitational
Speaker 1: attraction describes the action of two bodies that can be
Speaker 1: used for pretty much everything. Um. It is perfect for
Speaker 1: describing what happens, but it cannot tell you why the
Speaker 1: two items are attracted or drill down to the underlying mechanism. Yeah,
Speaker 1: law is like much more succinct. It just is what
Speaker 1: it is. Uh. Nor is the law even universal and
Speaker 1: could not be used to explain the para helion procession
Speaker 1: of Mercury's orbit burn. In comparison, Einstein's theory of general
Speaker 1: relativity was eventually used to solve the mercury issue. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: the mercury issue. Uh, and the standard model, along with
Speaker 1: the recent discovery the Higgs boson on my sern, can
Speaker 1: answer the why do these two masses attracted to each other? Question?
Speaker 1: I think what you mean is, why are these two
Speaker 1: masses attracted to one another? Mike, it's pretty teleological theory
Speaker 1: is considerably more developed and richer than a scientific law,
Speaker 1: which is more of a tool that is applicable to
Speaker 1: a wide range of applications. Keep up the good work
Speaker 1: that is, Mike DuPont. Thanks Mike, thanks for that of
Speaker 1: the Valley Forge DuPont's I think so, huh have you
Speaker 1: seen Fox Catcher? Oh no, I've heard it's good. Is
Speaker 1: a good? No? Really, I don't think so. Now. I've
Speaker 1: heard it's kind of slow. It's beyond slow. Really, I
Speaker 1: I can understand why, Um, the Academy loved it, or
Speaker 1: a lot of people. I'm sure, do you like it?
Speaker 1: I was not a fan of Fox Kich. I think
Speaker 1: people generally seeing like a turn by an actor like
Speaker 1: Steve Girl doing something really different. They're knocked out by that. No,
Speaker 1: I still can't believe you didn't like Birdman. No spoiler
Speaker 1: alert for people who have not seen Birdman. The following
Speaker 1: conversation is full of spoilers. Yes, what didn't you like
Speaker 1: about it? Um? So I thought? I thought Michael Keaton
Speaker 1: was good? Okay? Um? Who plays his daughter Emily Blunt?
Speaker 1: Is that? Who that is? Emma Stone? Emma Stone? Excellent? Okay?
Speaker 1: Um Edward and even pretty good? Okay? So the acting
Speaker 1: was fine? Who is Naomi Watts was in it? Yeah?
Speaker 1: She did great? Okay, So yes, the acting, the acting
Speaker 1: was fine. Sure that the acting was fine. I thought
Speaker 1: the photography was amazing. The whole seemingly one take thing
Speaker 1: kind of knocked you out. Probably I didn't even pick
Speaker 1: up on that, but yes it did. Um. It was
Speaker 1: more the the for me, the juxtaposition of the story,
Speaker 1: which was pretty boring in realistic and everyday life. Even
Speaker 1: though it was about a Broadway production, it was still
Speaker 1: about the everyday life of it. Sure, against the surrealism
Speaker 1: that's like threaded and embedded in throughout the whole movie.
Speaker 1: I didn't like that it was like choose one or
Speaker 1: the other? Man? It irked me. Um and uh. And
Speaker 1: then just so that one part with the critic or
Speaker 1: Michael Keaton tells off the critic. I thought Michael Keaton
Speaker 1: did a wonderful job, but just the whole point that
Speaker 1: it was in there of like the director, you know,
Speaker 1: using Michael Keaton's character to tell off all the critics
Speaker 1: he's ever wanted to. I just thought it was pretentious
Speaker 1: and I thought it was kind of clumsy in that
Speaker 1: sense too, and it was enough that it it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and then the ending. I did not like the ending
Speaker 1: at all at all. That'll ruin a good movie because
Speaker 1: it was completely went contrary to all the other stuff
Speaker 1: that he went out of his way to point out
Speaker 1: was fake or fraud and they're not real. And then
Speaker 1: all of a sudden it is what no choose one
Speaker 1: or the other? The director refused to make very important decisions,
Speaker 1: and I think that that ruined the movie. That is
Speaker 1: a very well uh thought out the criticism. I think
Speaker 1: you thank you very much? Sure, uh man. That was
Speaker 1: the end of Listener Mail even, wasn't it? Yeah? Because
Speaker 1: now I'm not like she's Josh is weird? He didn't
Speaker 1: like Birdman. Now I'm like just in like Birdman. He
Speaker 1: has good reasons. Thank you, Thank you. UM. I like
Speaker 1: justifying my opinion, don't we all? So? If you want
Speaker 1: to get in touch with Chuck and I or Jerry,
Speaker 1: who I apparently just spoiled Birdman for UM, you can
Speaker 1: contact us via Twitter at s Y s K podcast.
Speaker 1: You can join us on Facebook, dot com slash Stuff
Speaker 1: you Should Know. You can send us an email. This
Speaker 1: stuff podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and has
Speaker 1: always joined us at Home on the web. Stuff you
Speaker 1: Should Know dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a
Speaker 1: production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio,
Speaker 1: visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or where
Speaker 1: every list into your favorite shows. H