WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Beethoven’s DNA

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh, and

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's Chuck and this is short stuff, a pretty interesting

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one that comes from our friends at How Stuff Works,

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe, specifically from Robert Attenborough. Yeah, and lots of

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>other places. Because this I just saw this all over

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the news last week. The story of Beethoven's DNA has

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>been researched, and it just I don't know, it's like

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it hit the news cycle and I saw it in

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of places. I mean, I can understand why.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>It's very very fascinating, more fascinating than it appears on

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the surface. And the surface is Beethoven was fairly famous

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for suffering from a lot of terrible health maladies for

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>many years late in his life until his death, very

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>most famously his hearing loss, which is just fascinating that

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>he was still able to compose with hearing loss. That's

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just insane. Yeah, But people, some people are very much

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>fast sinated with Beethoven, even more than other people. And

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those people is Justin Beg who is a

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.639
<v Speaker 1>student of biological anthropology at UC Santa Cruz and also

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>an enormous Beethoven enthusiast. And he said Hey, I want

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to put my two things together and figure out what

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the heck was going on with Beethoven's body. Yeah, and

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>now we back up a little bit and talk a

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit about DNA and the challenges of taking DNA

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>from a dead person to figure anything out. It's it's

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not that easy. DNA from a live human is much

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>easier to work with in sequence, but if you're trying

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to get good DNA from a body, you're gonna want

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>teeth ideally, or the petris bone in the skull, which

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we did not have from Beethoven. But during Beethoven's day,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>collecting locks from brilliant people's hair was a thing, and

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so by virtue of that, it turns out there were

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>quite a few samples of Beethoven's locks around the world,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and they ended up with what they thought was eight

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yes, Tristan beg had eight that he was

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>able to access. None of them had roots, which was

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>made the whole thing much more difficult. If you have

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a root, you got a much better chance of extracting

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole genome from it, right. Yeah, But plucking a

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>whole handful of hair from Beethoven said was not allowed

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Beethoven did not want that to happen. He said, sure,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you can use some old timey scissors on me, or

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a sharp knife, and I'll sit here and

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>let you do it. But I do not pluck my hair.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>So that meant that the DNA in there in this

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>hair was composed of short, broken fragments. But Tristan Beg

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is such a Beethoven enthusiast and such a student of

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>biological anthropology that he said, I don't care. I'm going

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to piece together different fragments of DNA from these hair samples,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>from each hair sample to create basically as close to

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a net profile as I possibly can for each of

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the eight locks of hairs. And he did it. That's right.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I was so trying to come up with a joke

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about plucking hair, and what do you think? I am

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a harpsichord player. And then I tried to think of

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a like maybe Bach or somebody I couldn't remember who

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was most notable for their harpsichord work. And then I

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe Beethoven had some harpsichord stuff, and I bailed,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But I was just in my head that entire time.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, you missed some great stuff. Men. All apologies

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>all to think of a joke that I missed the

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity of, but at least you got to explain it,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all right. So the big reveal is is that he

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ended up with two locks of hair that had with

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>DNA sampling where they were like, all right, it's western

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>central Europe. We got great providence records, yeah, going back

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to yeah, going back to the early nineteenth century. So

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>these two, we feel really good about three more that

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>are genetically identical to those, So that's also probably Beethoven.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is pretty good providence records, So we think

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>these are for sure Beethoven's. But the other three are

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>problematic because one is a woman, so that's somebody got

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably paid way too much money for fake

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Beethoven locks. Yeah, and then another is a little side note.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Beethoven would probably be mad about that, because there are

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>no side notes. Each notice as important as the last. Yes,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the notes that I wrote. But the side note is

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that that lock, it turns out, had been previously used

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that Beethoven had lead poisoning, and it turns

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>out that probably wasn't even Beethoven's hair, right, So the

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>upshot of the whole thing is is that he had

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on his hands now five locks of hair genetically identical

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to one another, two of which were basically one percent

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed Beethoven's because they had Providence records. So as he

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>had five locks of Beethoven's hair to work with. So

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I say, Chuck, that that is a great point to

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>take our ad break. Let's do it all right. So

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>here we are with Beethoven's hair. And they did some

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>research on his DNA and they came back with some

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting results, one of which and they kind of

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>figured this, but they were like, all right, his hearing

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>loss wasn't genetic. It rarely is genetic anyway when you

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have adult onset hearing loss. So they kind of figured

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that was coming and that was kind of proved out.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>But they said, he does have poopy pants a lot. Yeah,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he suffers from GI issues, and he has liver disease

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>or had liver disease. Yeah. So they could not find

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>anything that they could connect to the GI problems. It

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he just had some bad clams that stayed

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with him or some sort of bad luck. But it

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a genetic thing. But the thing that they did

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>connect to his genetics. His genes were his liver issues. Yeah,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>apparently he suffered from pretty bad cerrosis. It looks like

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they know from just sort of historical record that he

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>did have attacks of jaundice, a pretty clear issue with

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 1>your liver going on. Yeah, but they actually found genetic proof.

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>They found particular variant two copies of the p and

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>p LA three gene linked to cirrhosis, and then single

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>copies of two variants of a gene that causes hemochromatosis nice,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>another liver condition. And then they also found a little

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>surprise and that I don't think they even knew about

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this at all until then, that he had hepatitis B. Yes,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at the very least in the final months of his life,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>possibly before. The thing is is that's not scandalous. A

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in Europe had he be at the time.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that a lot of people did at the

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>time was drink lots and lots of booze by today's standards,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And they'd long been question about whether Beethoven's jaundice was

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>brought on by liver disease brought on by excessive drinking.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And apparently there's even you know, record that mentions he

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>liked to drink, but it was not clear how much

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he liked to drink and if he liked to drink

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>more than the average person. So apparently Tristan Beg went

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one step further, examined records as closely as they could,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and said, I think he just drank like a normal amount, Like, yeah,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it'd be a lot today, but that's not what causes

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>liver problems. It was genetic, right, pretty interesting stuff. Have

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen Immortal Beloved the Beethoven movie Gary Oldman? No,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I have not. It was good. I think I

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was nineties. I want to say it was nineties.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It was good. I enjoyed it. But when's the last

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>time you saw the professional with Gary Oldman? That's been

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a while. I saw it a month ago. It's good,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but it holds up even better than it was back. Yeah,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. And Natalie Portman being twelve like out acts

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody else on the screen. It's nuts man that she's great.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That whole movie is just so good. Leon Um. The

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Immortal Beloved is good, it's not. It's not Amadeus level Um,

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as evidence by the fact that it didn't like clean

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>up at the Academy Awards. But it was pretty good.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So just remind me Amadeus was played by the guy

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>who who was in Animal House, right, Yeah, okay, I

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to Abraham. Yeah if Murray Abraham was was Salieri? Right?

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And boy boy, that was good. I want to see

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that again soon. That's a good one. I've not ever

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seen it. I never got around to it. Hmm. I'm

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a Dais is good. It's worth a look if you

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ever get a hanker. And for nineteen I think that

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was eighties biopic, Yes for sure, because the theme song

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>rock Me I'm a Dais hit the charts in the

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>eighties like Wildfires. Well that's it for short stuff, everybody.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to know more about Beethoven, you couldn't possibly.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.