WEBVTT - '"SORRY, SHE DIED:" NANCY GUTHRIE RANSOM NOTES TO SNARE SUSPECTS

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Crime Stories with Nancy Grace.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Sorry she died.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Really, the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes could be the key

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to snaring the suspects.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>What do we know?

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Tonight, good evening. I'm Nancy Grace, this is Crime Stories.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to thank you for being with us. The

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>ransom notes are all oaks. Then why at the get

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>go was Savannah told they were legitimate? Betel says N's

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Nano says Betel, Who can we trust?

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this real?

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I think anybody who reads them? My investigators, we look

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 4>at it and clearly there's things and there. They are

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 4>very concerning to our investigative team. So we hope that

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>by releasing the actual note we'll get some response from

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the community.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Did the Guthrie tame?

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 6>We know you'd be right.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I love when Nanas puts on his serious face.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, he's just released two ransom notes, the ones that

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 3>were indicated to us by Savannah as being legitimate, But

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 3>then he goes on to suggest they're not legit, in

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 3>direct contradiction to what she has been obviously told by

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 3>the FBI. Now he releases the notes, but wait a minute.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>What did he just say? What did he just say?

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen, is Nancy Guthrie alive or?

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 7>Based on everything that you have right now? I haven't

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 7>seen the indications she's dead. I don't have a body.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 7>I don't have a burial site. I don't have any note.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 2>What don't you just say?

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That's our friends at CBS. Play it one more time,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Control room, please, I gotta hear.

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 7>This is Nancy Guthrie alive or based on everything that

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 7>you have right now?

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I am seeing the indicator she's dead.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't have a body, I don't have a burial site,

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 7>I don't have any note.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Then he releases the ransom notes. Dave mac joining me

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Crime Stories investigative reporter. Is it him or my lionears?

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Did I just hear him say about twenty four hours

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>before he releases the ransom notes.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>That say sorry, she's dead?

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Did he just.

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Say I don't have a body, I don't have a

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>burial site, I don't have a note. And then twenty

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>three hours bam, he releases the note saying she's dead.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 8>He actually says, note, that's what kind of got me

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 8>more than anything, Nancy, is you know, to just offhandedly

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 8>say I don't have a body? Okay? Fine, but he

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 8>says note and then releases the very thing he says

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.839
<v Speaker 8>he doesn't have where we have alleged kidnappers, saying, plea

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 8>didn't realize how bad she was. She's now in nature.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 8>It is the most ridiculous, you know what.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 3>And I have reason to believe Dave mac and I'm

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>going to an expert on this.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Miller is joining us.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I have reason to believe that the note was transcribed

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>into English. To me, it sounds like English is the

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 3>second language. But that's a whole other can of worms.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's see the ransom notes. Please put up the ransom

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 3>notes in chronological order, please quickly. Number one, Hello Savannah,

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right there.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that.

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a degree of some familiarity from a guy that

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>steals your eighty four year old mother in her pj's,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>without shoes, without her glasses, without her hearing aids, without

0:03:55.440 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>her watch, nothing, Hi, Savannah, really can't wait for doctor

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Bethany to get.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>A hold of that.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>We have your mother. She's safe, but scared. She will

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>be held for ransom. Once payment is received, she will

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>be released unharmed. You need to send bitcoin in the

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 3>amount of four million dollars USD.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Another suggestion.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>This is a foreign national who says to USD when

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I go to the gas station, Nobody says, okay, that'll

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 3>be forty three dollars USD before five pm on the fifth.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Once payment is received to the bitgoing address, she will

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>be released within twelve hours to a safe drop off

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 3>location back in TUSNG. Let's see the rest chop. If

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>payment is not received by the last deadline, she will

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 3>be killed. Your mother is aware of this, and her

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>life is in your hands. Dot dot dot. That's interesting,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>the dot dot who does that? She had a white

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>smart watch on the floor of the foot of her

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>bed and the white floodlight in backyard was destroyed. Let's

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>go now to the second note so we can compare

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and contrast. Second note, this I believe came on the

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>sixth Guthrie family.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>We did not.

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Fully grasp the seriousness of her physical condition. Oh, laying

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>it on her as her fault. She's ill, it's her fault.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 3>She's eighty four years old, it's her fault. We didn't

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 3>understand her problem. We never intended to hurt her.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Comma. That was not our intention.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>That's called splicing, where you make a statement, and then

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you comma, and then you make the statement again. That's

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>the stylistic issue that Lisa Miller is going to explain.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I prosecuted a bank robbery based on comma use.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>She perished shortly after she was taken. We believe it

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>was heart related. Oh thank you doctor. She is buried

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 3>in nature. Now who says that again? Translation, nothing you

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 3>could have done could have changed the outcome.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>We want nothing you could have done.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, how about something he could have done, like not

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>kidnap her to start with? We want your family to

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 3>know this and hope you can all find peace. Sorry, Oh,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean okay. Straight out to Lisa Miller, joining US

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>former detective, former chief investigator, Senior Executive Colorado the AG's

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 3>office at Lisa Miller c O. She initially thought two

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 3>people had written a ransom note, but after reading them

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 3>in full, she thinks they're written by one person. Maybe

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think deeply enough, Lisa, but I always thought

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 3>they were both written by one person, and then after

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 3>that all the others. Eh No, I'm also the same

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>IP address. That's a big red flag. It's the same person.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>But I can't wait to hear your analysis tell me everything.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, initially, we kept hearing reports about the excerpts, and

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>it sounded like the second note was a massive shift

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 5>in tones and it definitely was different than what we're

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 5>seeing in the first. So that lended me from reporting

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 5>to think that maybe two even though it came from

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 5>the same ip. However, when we start taking a look

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 5>at the two notes together, and I think one of

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 5>the most definitive things that links these two notes are

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 5>these comma splices that you explained two sentences unnecessarily separated

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 5>by the comma. The second sentence in these two notes

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 5>is a reinforcing statement, so it's not necessary like we

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 5>never intended to hurt her. That was not our intention.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Why say both of those things, and it's repetitive. It

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 5>was not our intention. We did not intend to hurt her.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 5>And then we're also seeing open compounds in both of

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 5>these statements. Most people when they write out smart watch,

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 5>it's smart watch one word, flood floodlight one word. If

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 5>they see heart related, they hyphenate heart related. But in

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 5>these notes, we're seeing these open compounds. These smart watch

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 5>two separate words, not together, heart related, no hyphen So

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing these things they seem to leak stylistically, and

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 5>for that reason, I have to make a caveat here.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Though these are both short notes, so it's hard to

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 5>say definitively. You can't assign to Jenner. It's hard to

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 5>say to fenneratively that it's from one person. But based

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 5>on what we have, that's the best analysis.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Lisa didn't they both come from the same IP address.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 5>That is my understanding from reporting.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm glad you said it that way, because you know,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I never know which end of Nano's things are coming

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>out of this end or the other one. I'm still stunned.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Day day one hundred, he goes, we don't have a note,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Day one hundred and.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>One, here's the note.

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, All Star panel jumping in straight out to doctor

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Bethany Marshall joining us. Renownces like COO Analyst out of

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the LA jurisdiction. She's the author of deal Breaker in

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 3>the midst of her second book. She's seen on Peacock

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 3>on Hulu, on Bravo, and she's a star of a

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 3>new podcast on the Couch with Doctor Bethany Marshall. Doctor Bethany,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 3>thank you for being with us. Okay, I know you're

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna have a field day with this. Let's start. Let's

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>put a the first ransom note that has been released.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>The whole point of this tonight is will it help

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>us catch her killer? That's the issue. Oh hey, let

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>me see Lisa Miller, real quick, Lisa, Lisa, look at this.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I actually had it framed at the time.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>This was used in front of a jury, my jury

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 3>in my first bank robbery case. Don't Comma touch Comma

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the alram Comma alram dyslexi.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 2>This is a roby. He also is a prolific user

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of apostrophe marks.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>When I tracked down a witness, not an eyewitness, but

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>a circumstantial witness that knew a little bit about what

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the bank robber was wearing at the time of the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 3>robbery stylistically, so I got a line on him. The

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 3>witness was, of course, in the Fulton County jail. I

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 3>had him submit to a handwriting analysis and got a

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 3>known handwriting and that use of Comma's turned the case.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>It turned the case. So comma splicing, odd, use of

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Comma's odd phraseology exactly what you're talking about. I wasn't

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 3>as schooled as you were, as you are but I

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 3>knew what I could see. Okay, sorry, doctor Bethany, but

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I had to go get that to show it to Lisa.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Bethany hit it well.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 9>Whoever wrote this note is obsessive because he or she

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 9>repeats the same phrases multiple times like hyperbole. It's interesting.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 9>We have your mother, Nancy, she perished, She's in nature.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 9>This person is trying to act sympathetic to form a

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 9>bond with Savannah. In a way, he or she is

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 9>trying to manipulate Savannah into believing them. It's a little

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 9>like the BTK killer when he defended himself in court.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 9>He said about one of the victims, Hey, I'm a

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 9>nice guy. I comforted her before I strangled her, before

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 9>I put a pillow over her face. So this person

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.119
<v Speaker 9>who wrote the note, Okay.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Wait, you're talking so fast, Bethany. This is not a

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 3>speed race.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Slow it down. Okay, what did you just say?

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 9>The BTK killer, in an attempt to persuade the jury

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 9>that he was not guilty, said I'm not a bad guy.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 9>I comforted her before I killed her. The author of

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 9>this note is trying to get sympathy from Savannah, and

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 9>I think we have your mother, Nancy, she perished was

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 9>her heart, she's in nature. It sounds a little bit

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 9>like the sociopath manipulating the victim before they slashed their throats.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 9>It's a highly manipulative note. The first note asks for money,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 9>the second says, oh, never mind, she perished. That tells

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 9>me that by the time the author gets to the

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 9>second note, they're more worried about breeding being brought up

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 9>on homicide murder charges than the four million that they

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 9>wanted originally. I do have an image of a wife

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 9>or girlfriend standing over the author's note saying, oh, add this,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 9>add that, as if one is not enough, got to

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 9>say it again and again. I do believe the author

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 9>is obsessive, that they took a long time to write

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 9>this note. The author is not is an ex patriot

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 9>because of the USD and they take the almost like

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 9>a European might say they were in hospital, not they

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 9>were in the hospital. So I noticed that as well,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 9>and I think, finally you know the fact that there's

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 9>these shifts and turns throughout the notes. You know, when

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 9>I wrote my doctoral dissertation, I was told to consult

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 9>with everybody in the department, about thirty people by the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 9>time I defended my dissertation, the committee said, sounds like

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 9>it was written by thirty people. I'm like, yeah, I

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 9>consulted with thirty people. It sounds like this guy or

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 9>gal handed the note around, deliberated, thought a lot about it.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 9>But again, primarily it's the manipulative tone. So if you,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 9>whoever's listening, has somebody in your household who over talks

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 9>is manipulative, grandiose, uses hyperbole, a lot of verrbal borishes,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 9>you should think very carefully about where that person was.

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 9>Nancy Gotthrie went missing.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, back to you, Lisa Miller, who has done an

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>incredible analysis of this note. What do you make of

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>what Bethany just said? And our whole purpose tonight is

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to try to use these notes to identify the killer

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and he will be charged with felony murder even if

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>his fantastical claim is true that Missus Guthny died of

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>natural causes. Whenever a death occurs during the commission of

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>a felony equals felony murder, which is murder one which

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>does get the death penalty. It doesn't matter if you

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't intend for the person to die. If they die

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>in the commission of a felony that would be kidnapped

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 3>or burglary. That's a felony murder punishable by the death penalty.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Now you heard what doctor Bethany said. Now I have

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 3>great respect for doctor Bethany a clairvoriant. I don't know that,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 3>but her image she says of a girlfriend's standing over

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the writer's shoulder is.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Not are fetched. That said, What do you make of it?

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, I have much respect for everything that was said.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 5>From an investigative standpoint, I look at the second note

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of like I looked at the offender across the

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 5>table from me back when I was doing interviews of

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 5>murderers or even the worst offenders that did some of

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 5>the worst crimes against children. They always minimize their involvement.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 5>They turn it the second note is a passive thing.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Nancy perished, Nancy didn't perish. You did something horrible by

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 5>taking a vulnerable elderly woman out of the house, and

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 5>you caused this. But that's how they choose to disk themselves.

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 5>It's very common against that we hear the worst criminals

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 5>do this. They take a passive role. It's always someone

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 5>else's fault. It's definitely not their fault. And then I'm

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 5>taking a look at like the phrase of perished and

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 5>buried in nature odd statements, right, we have to evaluate

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 5>could that be translation artifact from the translation tool or

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 5>is it possibly ideolect something from where this individual has

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 5>We all have this here in the States. We most

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 5>of us speak English. We have different parts of the state,

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 5>We have different slang that we use. That's our ideolect.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 5>It's individual to us. So perhaps this person the buried

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 5>in nature the perish is their own ideolect. And so

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 5>what people should be looking for at this point in

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 5>time is looking at whether actually asked to watch behavioral

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 5>changes post offense. Think about who writes like the dates

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 5>the dates that were written in the notes, Who writes

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 5>their dates out like that? Who maybe uses perish every

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 5>now and then? Who have you heard that uses buried

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 5>in nature?

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Crime stores? With Nancy Grace.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 6>On behalf of our family, we want to thank all

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 6>of you for the prayers for our beloved mom. Nancy.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 6>We feel them and we continue to believe that she

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 6>feels them too. Our mom is a kind, faithful, loyal,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 6>fiercely loving woman of goodness and liked. She's funny, spunky,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 6>and clever. She has grandchildren that adore her and crowd

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 6>around her and cover her with kisses.

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 5>She loves fun and adventure.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 6>She is a devoted friend, full of kindness and knowledge.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Talk to her and you'll.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 6>See the light is missing from our lives.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 5>Nancy is our mother. We are her children. She is

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 5>our beacon.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 6>She holds fast to joy in all of life's circumstances.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 6>She chooses joy day after day, despite having already passed

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 6>through great trials of pain and grief. We are always

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be merely human, just normal human people who

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 6>need our mom. Mama, Mama, if you're listening, we need

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 6>you to come home.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 3>That was a portion of one of Savannah Guthrie's first

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 3>please to bring her mother home. That is before she

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 3>got the second note stating that missus Guthrie is dead,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and she had to put on a brave face and

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 3>go back into the anchorchaeir in front of millions of people,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 3>knowing the very distinct possibility her mother is dead straight

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 3>out to Joseph Scott Morgan, Professor Forensics, Jacksonville State University.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>He is the author of Blood Beneath My Feet on Amazon.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>He is a star of a hit series Body bags

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>with Joe Scott Morgan. But most important, he is a

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 3>death investigator with over ten thousand death scenes under his belt.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>When I say professor of forensics, that doesn't just include

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 3>as a death investigator. He investigates the scene. How are

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 3>these notes going to help us? And I haven't even

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>gotten into all of Nanos's screw ups that are now

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 3>coming to light. Let me just direct your attention very quickly,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Joe Scott Morgan to other missives that have resulted in

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a bust. That would be obviously Theodore Kazinski, the unibomber.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 2>He had a thirty five thousand word manifesto.

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Nut job here, we've only got about two hundred and

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 3>eighty four words. That's a good question, not only for you,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 3>but for Lisa as well. What can we do with

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 3>those two hundred and eighty four words. Then there are

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>others You've got Israel Keys who sent a ransom note

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 3>including a photograph Joe Scott Morgan, as you and I

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 3>discussed in the past, of the victim dead, and he

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>had heavily made her up and sewn her eyes open

0:21:52.800 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>and blurried the photo so the victim FA remember her.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 3>The young barista Samantha Koenig blurred the photos so her

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 3>father could not tell whether she was dead or alive,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and then sent a ransom note he was caught. Then

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you've got other Oh yeah, btk, he sent written taunts

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 3>buying torture, killed Dennis Raider. Oh there's his ugly face.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 3>He's still alive, amazingly. Then let's see, there's so many more.

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>You've got Zodiac who taunted with written notes, never identified.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 3>That's helpful, right there. I can't tell a thing about him.

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>And there are others. Oh yes, son of Sam Berkowitz

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>caught written missives. Okay, look at him? Ugh, okay, Joe

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Scott forensically, what can I do with this? What can

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 3>you add, Joe Scott that Lisa hasn't already told us?

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Speak now?

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think the thing that really reaches out to

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 10>me is that where they say we didn't intend to

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 10>hurt her, and they talk about this intention again, and

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 10>for me, that goes to the idea that they did

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 10>in fact hurt her. And guess what, we've got evidence

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 10>of that evidence that, by the way, and I'll say

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 10>it plainly, that was ignored to their own peril. Now,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 10>and that is that blood deposition that we had on

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 10>that front porch that they seemingly walked over, ignored whatever

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 10>the hell they were doing at that moment in time,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 10>and they didn't see the import in this. And so

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 10>for me, these two things are connected. I you know,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 10>it's it's very easy to sit here and say, yeah,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 10>she was infirmed, and you know she had physical problems.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 10>I've got I've got a lot more questions relative to

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 10>this because they're the ones that bring up the term hurt.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 10>They're the ones that say this, and we have evidence

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 10>of violence here as far as I'm concerned, that's position

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 10>of blood that has originated from the Naso FARNICKX area.

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 10>I am of the opinion that they pop this poor

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 10>lady in the face to try to get her to comply,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 10>and she bled right there. I'm not saying she bled out,

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 10>but they started her down this road. I don't give

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 10>two hoots in hell what your intention was. She wound

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 10>up dying in your custody, illegal custody by the way,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 10>this is a kidnapping. Obviously you are held directly responsible

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 10>for this. So these people are violent, they are very violent,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 10>and now they're wanting to go back on this I

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 10>think that they just by virtue of that second note,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 10>they know that there is a chance they're going to

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 10>have to pay a heavy price for this. Now if

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 10>they can get their wires straight relative to the investigative

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 10>team and get marshalled on the line to head in

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 10>the right direction investigatively, hopefully it's not too late. I

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 10>think that there's still a chance that they can find

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 10>out who whoever it is that did this, because look,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 10>as far as I'm concerned, these people are crazy. They're

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 10>still out there and they can do harm to other people.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>For Crime Stores with Nancy Gray.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Wright and Joining a cybersecurity expert former detective, he

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>has actually trained the FBI KRT team on Internet investigations.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 3>He is the founder and the CEO of the National

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Center for Open and Unsolved Cases. Also, he's editor and

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>host the Star of Crime Reconstructed.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Morgan, thank you for being with us, jump in.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 11>I'm going to be I'm going to go a different

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 11>tact on a lot of this stuff. A lot of

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 11>my training also comes out of the intelligence community. I

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 11>trained members the damage assessment people at NSACIA FBI. I'm

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 11>looking at a lot of this stuff and I'm saying

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 11>we're making a lot of assumptions, and these assumptions are

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 11>not yet grounded in fact. So I take a look

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 11>at even the ransom communications, and my first thought is

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 11>Earl Edwin Pitts, FBI agent rested under a false flag

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 11>operation by the FBI. Once the wall came down, we

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 11>started seeing this information. I look at these communications. There's

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 11>not enough material in there.

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 5>To do it.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 11>Like in the unibomber case. By the way, some of

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 11>the folks you know, like Mary All and O'Toole worked

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 11>with a friend of mine, doctor William Floyd Tafoya, to

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 11>revise the profile of the unibomber. What they originally thought

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 11>was not it. It was a ludeye in his fifties,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 11>very technically advanced. So that was Kazinski. So I take

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 11>a look and I say, all, there are alternative views

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 11>of this information that we could have, especially the ransom note.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 11>So real quickly, here is somebody who is sophisticated enough

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 11>to establish bitcoin. They use the bitcoin address in addition

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 11>to the IP address. The one thing we know is

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 11>the bitcoin address was put in both emails. So the

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 11>ability to do that shows it's that right. There is documentation,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 11>it's the same thing with BTK, same thing with zodiac.

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 11>You put items in there to document that you are

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 11>who you say you are. Second thing is that this

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 11>person these notes, the originator of these notes, has so

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 11>far eluded identification by the FBI and Nancy. As you

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 11>were saying, I mean many years ago I trained the FBI,

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 11>but they are now the student has now become the master.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 11>When you can identify Chinese PLA agents, Russian SVR FSB agents,

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 11>when you can do identify state actors in these investigations

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 11>through in cyberspace, the fact that this person has not

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 11>yet been identified shows a level of sophistication. So I

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 11>don't want to assume that these messages are in fact

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 11>what they're purported to be. I look at it. Are

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 11>they a type of misdirection? Is this more of a

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 11>psychological type of thing to make you believe that it's

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 11>somebody overseas or somebody a foreign when they're actually not.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 11>This is all designed to slow you down, slow down

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 11>the investigation, make you chase rabbit holes. So I've been

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 11>very skeptical about these notes. I don't call them ransom

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 11>notes because even in the note, if you were as

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 11>I said before, words mean things it says quite smart watch.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 11>It does not say Apple watch. You could have made

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 11>a leap of logic to find out that that that

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 11>watch may have been left behind. I don't know that

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 11>for sure, but I don't see anything proprietary. If you

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 11>wanted to prove to me that you actually had Nancy,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 11>that you were in care, you had the care and

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 11>custody and control of her, then send me a piece

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 11>of her clothing, send me something we can test with

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 11>DNA to correctly establish.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 5>In fact.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 11>On the screen right now, you can see it's a

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 11>white Apple watch. That it's not just a smart watch,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 11>it's an Apple watch. People also identify by brands, so Nancy.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 11>I've been very skeptical about a lot of this information.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 11>I agree that releasing the note might help, but again,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 11>as we said about the unibomber, the difference in the

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 11>manifesto and the number of words gives you behavioral insight.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 11>I don't think you can get from a small amount

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 11>of words.

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Here, Nanos, wake up man.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 3>You have me to call you every morning and wake

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>you up and get you started.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>You have any color code you're clothes for you?

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 3>For Pete's sake, that said Nanos going down with the ship,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>pretending everything's honkey dory a okay with the Feds?

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 2>What a croc okay, listen to this lie.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a good relationship. It's always been a good relationship.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 4>We've we've been a member of the what it's known

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 4>as the Southern Arizona Violent Crime Task Force headed up

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 4>by the FBI for decades. We've always participated and to

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 4>this day we still do. It's a it's a it's

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 4>a it's not just a great relationship, it's one that's

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 4>very valued.

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Notice he looks right at you and lies, so you

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 3>believe him, or Hanity and Ptail, listen to this.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 12>I understand everybody's frustrations on this.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm not frustrated with you.

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm frustrated that they If I was a sheriff and

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you the FBI is willing to help me, and time

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>is of the essence I would want.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I'd want all the help I can get.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 12>We have Quantico best live in the world. I had

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 12>a fixed wing aircraft on the ground ready to move

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 12>it immediately through the night. They just say know and

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 12>they said, we're sending it to Florida, And I launched

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 12>hundreds of agents and Intel staff to Phoenix and Tucson

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 12>just for this case, just.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>To be on stand.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 12>They didn't want just to do the canvassing, and we

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 12>said we'll take the DNA.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 3>My ears are bleeding right now at all the missed opportunities.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Back to you, Joseph Scott Morgan. You mentioned the blood

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>on the front porch. Let's see it. It's not just there,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 3>but it trails off down the walkway, which tells me

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>which way they took her out. It's very obvious. This

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>is from our friends at Fox Muse Digital. That was

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>treated like it was nothing. People walked all over it.

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean later day, late dollar short we saw a

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>tent erected around the front porch where I guess they

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 3>were finally processing it, but not before everybody and her

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>little sister trumped all over it, including a pizza delivery

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>person ruin. Now that's on the outside that I can see,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I can only imagine the horrors, the evidentiary horrors that

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 3>took place on the inside. One DNA two.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>They ignored the.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Fact that the back door was propped open. Hello, that's

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>how one purp came in. And I to this day

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 3>believe the guy the porch guy was looking in the

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>window to see if his accomplice had made it to

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.959
<v Speaker 3>the front door. Yet no forest entry. Why because they

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 3>came in the back and opened the front door. Duh,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 3>So they completely ignored the back door. They go Leelu's

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>valuable critical hours by going back and forth of the family.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you think she wandered off?

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Hell?

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 3>No, she can only walk X number of yards. She

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't wander off. The family kept trying to tell them that,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>did they listen. No, That aircraft, very very sive equipment

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>on it, sat on that runway, fixed wing till dusk dusk,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>from dawn till dusk.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>It ain't just a movie. Okay. That's how long they

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>waited to do.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Nanos's bidding, and he couldn't get his uh self together

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 3>to use it. I'm just giving you a few examples.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 3>You know how important the first hours are, Joe Scott.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I do.

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 10>A high school forensic class would have pushed everybody away

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 10>relative to that blood evidence that you see there and

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 10>would have said, we got to lock this down. That's

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 10>so elemental in an investigation. And here's one other thing.

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 10>You can keep that clip up. This guy moving around

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 10>out here, do you see where he's placing his feet

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 10>out there on those ceramic tiles. If and you know

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 10>the old adage about you know, wishes in one hand

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 10>something else and the other see what fills up first.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 10>But if you see this right here and he's stomping

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 10>around out there, if they had frozen this area down,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 10>locked it down, do you realize that they could have

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 10>done electrostatic lifts out there, place milar down, lifted shoeprints

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 10>out there, and yeah, it's going to be overlaid with

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 10>other shoeprints. But if you freeze it at that moment

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 10>in time, you can get an idea as to what

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 10>he's leaving behind us a very dusty area and you

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 10>can see every step he takes. Even how often do

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 10>we have where we have a this is literally gritted off, Nancy. Yeah,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 10>that's we created that at Jack State. And it would

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 10>have been so easy to have lifted that off if

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 10>they just frozen, you know, just frozen in time. That's

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 10>that's one of the elements that happens in a crim

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 10>Seene investigation. We have the ability to lock things down,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 10>freeze right and Lord only knows what happened in that

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 10>bedroom that has been lost.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Miller, I'd like to hear your thoughts.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Well. I think you know from your time as a prosecutor,

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 5>there's no such thing as a perfect investigation. There are

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 5>flaws now omittedly here. We have substantial flaws. I agree

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 5>that crime scene should have been locked down, that should

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 5>have been expanded right away. Everybody should have been kicked

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 5>off with that property. We know that. I have to

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.439
<v Speaker 5>give the benefit of the doubt here. We didn't have

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.919
<v Speaker 5>the video of this porch guy walking around in those

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 5>first days, and there was some mistakes, and as much

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 5>regard as.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I have for the FBI, I do not want to

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>tangle with you because of your expertise and maybe over

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 3>my head right now, but no, we didn't have the

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 3>video because Nana's blurret it out.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>There is no video, but we did have.

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>The blood trailing off in the direction where she went,

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 3>so we know she went that way. I don't need

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a video. I could figure that much out on my own.

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 3>My two twins could figure that out.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 5>I agree. And in a massive misstep by both the FBI,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 5>because they did come back later, they also did not

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 5>take that mat. They also did not take that door

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 5>off and ship it to Quantico for processing. Well, you're

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 5>exactly right. We saw the blood, so that should have

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 5>shut down that front entrance area. They also should have

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 5>seen where the camera a camera had been removed from

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 5>the frame holding it to the doorframe. That should have

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 5>given them an indication.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Good point. Good point. We completely glossed over that. That

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 3>was a major red flag that she had been taken.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Yet they dithered around for hours trying to figure out

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that she wander off and another blurt effects nanos reveals

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 3>something critical.

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 4>It's very active. We've got a lot of work ahead

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 4>of us. We've done a lot of work, but we

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 4>still have more. And there's not just in DNA where

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 4>labs across the country are working together, but in forensics

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 4>analysis of thousands and thousands of videos, photos, and we

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 4>also have still tens of thousands of tips that we

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 4>that come in and we actively work in them. So

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a very active investigation.

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Every time he speaks, I cringe, why is DNA all

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 3>across the country because he sent it to his pet

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>lab that he's got a money contract with in Florida

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 3>DNA Lab International, I believe is the name, instead of

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 3>sending it to experts in this field.

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>They again dithered.

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 3>For weeks and weeks and weeks before it was finally

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 3>sent to labs that could handle the job.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I call on.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 3>All citizen sleuths, regardless of your expertise. They need help.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 3>My mind is open to any analysis, any observation at

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 3>all regarding these ransom notes. How do you think Kazinski

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 3>was solved because of the manifesto? It's happened over and

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 3>over before. If you know or think you know anything

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 3>about Missus Guthrie's disappearance, dial eight hundred two two five

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 3>five three two four, or if you wish to remain

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 3>anonymous five two zero eight eight two seven four sixty three.

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>There is one point two plus million dollar reward for

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 3>information leading to Missus Guthrie or her remains. Where about.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 3>A conviction is not required for you to get one

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 3>point two million dollars. We remember an American hero, Deputy

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Sheriff Jillian Olson, Lexington County Sheriff of South Carolina, just

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine killed in a line of duty, leaving behind

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 3>grieving parents. So proud of her, Jim and Molly. American

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 3>hero Deputy Sheriff Jillian Olson, thank you to our guest,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 3>but especially to you for never giving up in the

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 3>search for missus Guthrie. Nancy Gray signing off for tonight,

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 3>but I'll see you tomorrow night, and until then, good night.