WEBVTT - Tech News: Elon Musk X's Out Twitter

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, and.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech are you.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the tech news for Tuesday, July twenty fifth,

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. And let's get this out of the

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>way first. Elon Musk has rushed into changing Twitter into

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his long talked about it does Everything app called X.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk actually has a long history with X. He actually

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>also has a lot of x'es. Back in the late

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties, Musk was part of a group that founded

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a site called x dot com. It was essentially an

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>online bank. Then they acquired a competing service called Confinity,

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and primarily they became own as a service that allowed

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>users to do money transfers over the internet. X dot

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 1>com was purchased by eBay and became PayPal, and Elon

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk was subsequently ousted from PayPal when Peter Thiel led

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a coup and his group gave Elon Musk the boot.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they found him difficult to work with, but of

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>course by that time he had already received his massive

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>payout of eBay purchasing the company, so he was well

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>on his way from going from being wealthy to obscenely wealthy.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The domain X dot com remained at PayPal for more

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>than a decade. However, in twenty seventeen, Musk purchased the

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>rights to the name from PayPal for nostalgic reasons. Meanwhile,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>over in China, the company ten Cent had in twenty

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven released an app called we Chat. As Stefan would say,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this app hasing instant messaging, voice messaging, one to many

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>messaging like Twitter, mobile payments, and other social media functions.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably the worst Saturday Night Live sketch I've ever done.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>When Elon Musk started talking about acquiring Twitter, he also

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>said his long term plan was to incorporate Twitter's functionality

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>into an everything app similar to we Chat, but for

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world, and that he was going

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to call this app X.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Well. This past weekend, Musk.

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Started making those changes, So if you visit Twitter dot com,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that there's now an X logo in place

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the once familiar bird logo that had been there

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for ages.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>It's gone now.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>There's been no shortage of criticisms for this move. A

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks question the wisdom of ditching more than

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a decade of branding and ip. In fact, Twitter and

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>tweeting are common words in the text sphere, and a

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are suggesting that it's just a really

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>bad move to just unceremoniously ditch all that the police

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>also thought it was a bad move temporarily, or at

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>least that the physical act of taking the word Twitter

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>down outside the company's HQ was a really bad move

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because that involved a crane that blocked two lanes of

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>traffic on a busy street, and there was a question

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not Elon Musk had bothered to get

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a permit to do that. Anyway, the crew only managed

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to remove the twitt from the logo before the delays

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>set in, so the er was still on there. I

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>almost said that the crew managed to remove the twit,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but Elon's still at the company, so I guess that's

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not true. AO, The stompage was just a temporary delay.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The police determined that no crime was being committed, and

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, they didn't actually charge anyone with anything.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk says that the twins name once made sense back

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in the day when you were limited to sending messages

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred and forty or fewer characters, but these

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>days you can post a lot more stuff, including long

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>form video. So he argues Twitter as a name doesn't

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>make any sense personally. I disagree. I don't think that

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the increase in services and capability and functionality has negated

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the sense of the name. But then again, I also

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have even one billion dollars to my name, so

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what do I know. Musk also said that tweets should

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>now be called x's, and maybe that'll catch on. There's

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>also the possibility that Musk will just gut this newly

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>renamed service of some of its features as he pushes

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for X to be the everything app he wants it

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to be. You know. Rumor has it that he doesn't

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>really like the retweet feature and that that might just

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be you know, on on borrowed time. Now, there are

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>questions remaining that will he be able to succeed, Will

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he be able to create an X app that has

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>some but not all, of Twitter's functionality as well as

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>other functions and make it a success, or maybe other

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>services like Threads or blue Sky or Mastodon will take

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the reins, or maybe people will just come to the

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that they are fed up with Twitter style social platforms.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm one of those. I technically have a

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Thread's account and a blue Sky account and a mastadon account,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and I very rarely check them because I just find

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>them exhausting. Now, I did mention masddon just a moment ago,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a federated approach to social platforms. That means

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that rather than having a centralized corporate structure where you

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have a single entity that dictates the rules and policies

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for the platform, Mastedon consists of multiple in instances called servers,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and each server can have its own rules and policies

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>and vibe and culture. So some servers cater more to

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a specific community than others do, like this community is

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for queer creators, for example, that might be one masted

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>On server. Not that you know it's exclusively that, but

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's who was in mind when they created the server.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of system facilitates communication across servers. So

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you join server A and your friend joins

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>server B, you can still communicate with each other through

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>this system. Discovery is a little trickier if you're on

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>different servers, but still possible. It's just not as intuitive.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But Mastodon is in the news for a really grim reason.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Some researchers at Stanford discovered that after examining three hundred

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five thousand posts, they found one hundred and

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve instances of known child sexual abuse material, also known

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>as seesam c SAM. Their search covered the twenty five

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>most popular servers on Mastodon, and in addition to the

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>messages actually containing known seesam, they found more than a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand instances of messages pointing to off site seesam you

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know resources, whether it was a trading site or grooming sites.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Terrible awful things, and it points to a really big

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 1>challenge with the federated approach to these social networks because

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>big centralized companies can have entire departments that are filled

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>with content moderators, or actually, more likely they'll outsource that

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to a third party company that is employing people in

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>developing countries. We've seen that over and over and how

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that has affected people who are working in those jobs.

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>The point is they have a lot of people who

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>are working on the problem in these big centralized companies,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but in the THETA verse. You're talking about instances that

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have only a single moderator running them, and chances are

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>being the server's one moderator is not actually that person's

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>real job. They've got another job, and they just do

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this on the side, like in their spare time, which

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>means that when problems arise, you know, when people are

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>violating terms of service or when they are posting outright

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>illegal content, it takes time for the moderator to be

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>able to address it. And if it's happening a lot

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've only got the one moderator, then those problems

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really start to pile up. For these federated services to survive,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I suspect they're going to have to develop and incorporate

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more automated tools to supplement the work that's

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>being done by human moderators. Here's a case where you

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can make a real strong argument for the need for AI.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You would need AI powered tools that are very good

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at identifying instances that have illegal material or CESAM related

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>material on them so that you can respond much more

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly and decisively and have a safe community. Otherwise, these

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>services will not really be able to take the place

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of these centralized services. That currently dominate the web because

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they won't be able to scale without encountering massive problems

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like being saturated with illegal and harmful content. So it

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is the dark side of the fediverse. Okay, one more

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>story before we go to break, and that is you know,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I talked about PayPal a little bit earlier. I mean

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about Musk's history with the letter X.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the US Federal Reserve because it has

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a new system being rolled out called fed now. So

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this service coordinates payment between different financial institutions like banks

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and credit unions. So at launch, thirty five banks and

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>credit unions are included in this system. But that's just

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning of this initiative. The goal is to

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>create a network work that connects more than nine thousand

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions together for what purpose well, essentially to make

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it easy for people, at least people who have a

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bank account to transfer money to each other, So forget

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>checks or debit cards or even apps like Venmo or PayPal.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, PayPal owns Venmo in case you weren't aware,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember hearing some millennials talk about, you know, dissing

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>PayPal because they want to use Venmo, and I was

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just like you do know PayPal owns Venmo, You're still

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>using PayPal right or any of those other cash transfer apps.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So this would allow you to make direct transfers from

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one bank account to another, as long as the two

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>banks or community credit unions or whatever it may be

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>are connected within this network, the FED and visions FED

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>now to also allow people to access funds much faster

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with fewer roadblocks.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So imagine, let's say that.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You run a small business and you invoice another company

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because they've hired you to do some work and you

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>did the work, so you send them an invoice and

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they can pay you through FED now. Well, the money

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>can go through much more quickly and then you can

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>access it right away. And obviously that can be really

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>helpful for people who have cash flow issues right where

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not that they don't have money coming

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to them, it's just it's not in their account right now.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>This can help cut down on those kinds of situations

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and streamline those financial transactions. So it could be person

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to person, it could be company to person or person

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to company. It's meant to just kind of facilitate all

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of that and to remove the need for these third

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>party applications. There's still a long way to go to

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>get to that point, obviously. Whether just thirty five initial

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>systems that are in place, that's not enough obviously to

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>really make a huge difference. Also, the participating institutions are

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not required to fully implement all the services, so some

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are taking it a little more slowly than others, and

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they're only allowing certain services to be used within their systems.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So fed now has the potential to disrupt stuff like

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>PayPal and Venmo and cash apps and things like that,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going to happen overnight, and for the

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are unbanked or underbanked, this might not prove

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a relevant technology. We still have to find

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>ways to facilitate them being part of these financial transactions

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because just having a bank account can be a barrier

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to entry for a lot of people. So it still

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to address that issue too, And I don't know

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that the system ultimately will. That may not even be

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the mission statement at all for fed now, but

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting that it could have a massive impact

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on money transfers using the internet.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now we're going to take a quick break when

0:12:59.280 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>we come back.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot more news to cover, all right,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>We're back.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>More than one thousand.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>App developers in the UK I think around fifteen hundred

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>actually have joined in on a class action lawsuit against Apple.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They argue that Apple is using its monopoly as a

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>storefront for iOS apps to charge high fees to developers.

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 2>So this is a.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Complaint we have heard numerous times in the past and

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has been addressed in various court cases around the world. So,

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as you likely know, Apple collects between fifteen to thirty

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>percent on in app transactions for most types of transactions.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>There are some that get an exception, but for most

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple gets a fifteen to thirty percent cut. So if

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>you spend a dollar in an app from a really

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>big developer, that developer might only get seventy cents of

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that dollar and the other thirty cents goes to Apple.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that doesn't sound like that much, But

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>then you start thinking about all the apps and the

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>millions of people, the hundreds of millions of people who

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are using iOS apps to do these different transactions. It

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>really adds up, and it means Apple breaks in the

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>big bucks through this practice. The app developers argue this

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is unfair to them because there's nowhere else they can

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>go if they want to get their app in front

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of iOS users. There's no alternative to the Apple App Store,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's no competition in the space, and that means

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple holds a monopoly for that market and can dictate terms.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The lawsuit is seeking a billion dollars from Apple. Is

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar class action lawsuit. Recently, Apple has made

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some steps to move away from its kind of iron

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>grip approach that it had been known for for years,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and those steps include things like allowing developers to use

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>different financial services to complete transactions instead of Apple's own

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in house financial system, all the way to potentially opening

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>up so that competing app storefronts can offer apps on

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>iOS devices. One word about the different third party financial

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>services thing, Apple, at least in some markets, was kind

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of sneaky about this, Like, yes, they allowed it, you

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>could use a different financial services company to complete your transactions,

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but Apple would put essentially like an Apple tax on

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>top of it, which means you would actually collect even

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>less money per transaction. And obviously a lot of people

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>are challenging that, saying Apple is doing this unfairly that

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you unwilling to relinquish control. Apple creates disincentives to use

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>any alternatives. So yes, technically there are alternatives, but they

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are less attractive than Apple's own approach because Apple has

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>artificially made them more expensive. That's been an argument in

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>some regions as well, so we'll have to see how

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this one plays out. Google recently published its Environmental Impact

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Report for twenty twenty two, and the company revealed that

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it is using a truly enormous amount of water every year.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year, the company used five point six billion gallons

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of water, most of it potable water, meaning drinkable water,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>water that's safe to drink. Many of Google's data centers

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>depend upon water cooled systems to keep machines in operation

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. The

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>general expectation is that twenty twenty three is going to

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>see another big jump in water consumption because Google, like

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other companies, has pushed forward really hard

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the AI space, and AI requires a lot of

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>compute power, so to meet those requirements, it shouldn't be

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a surprise that Google is going to need to consume

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>more resources in order to keep machines running. Below critical temperatures.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>According to Google reps, the company is also relying on

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>air cooled systems to help reduce the need for water,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly in places that are impacted by a water crisis,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and Google says it is committed to replenish quote one

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty percent of the freshwater it consumes end

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>quote by twenty thirty. That's according to Business Insider. However,

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in that same article, the writer reveals that currently Google

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>replenishes just six percent of the freshwater it consumes, So

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously the company is going to have to make some

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>substantial changes to meet that one hundred and twenty percent

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>goal within seven years. Considering that large parts of the

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>US are either currently in a water crisis or they

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>very well may be in a water crisis within a

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>year or two, this is a real problem that needs

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a serious solution. Now stop me if you've heard this one.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Tech companies see a potentially massive market. There's a tiny catch, however,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this market is in a region that's run by an oppressive,

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian government, and that government is going to have some

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>tight restrictions on any company that works within that region,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up to and including requiring the companies to share data

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>with the government itself. Plus the government has been connected

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>with atrocious acts in the past. Yes, we saw this

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>actually happen in China. And while a lot of tech

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>companies were initially very eager to get across and get

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>access to the enormous population of potential users in China,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those same companies later abandoned China after

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>discovering that sure enough, doing business there came with too

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>many downsides. Well, I guess we can say those companies

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>learned from their mistakes, because they're ready to repeat them

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly by the way, I lifted that joke from

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Peter Cook in a Beyond the Fringe sketch. Anyway, Saudi

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Arabian officials are courting tech companies to set up operations

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>within Saudi Arabia, partly to create a new technological wonder

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>city that some people are really worried is going to

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>become like the perfect surveillance city to keep track on

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the movements of everyone who's within it. It's pretty dystopian stuff.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So the effort is to make Saudi Arabia a global

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>center for tech as part of a plan called the

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Vision twenty thirty plan. Companies that have signed on include Google,

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which signed on last year, and Microsoft, which signed on

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, both of which are now building cloud centers

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>within Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, human rights experts warned that Saudi

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Arabia has some rather vague but powerful laws regarding national

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>security which give the government really kind of limitless power

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to make demands of companies that operate within their borders,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and that those demands could include telling Google and Microsoft

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and other tech companies that they have to share information

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so that the government can do things like track down dissidents.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>And in Saudi Arabia, a dissident can be someone like

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a journalist reporting on the dealings of the Saudi Arabian royalty.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And as we have seen, the government is not above

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>assassinating people like that. It has happened, It happened not

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>long ago. You speak out against authoritarian power in Saudi Arabia,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you face massive consequences. A woman in Saudi Arabia criticized

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this futuristic technological city on Twitter. She is now serving

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year jail sentence for speaking out about it.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's this huge concern that Google and Microsoft, in

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>an eagerness to tap into the undeniably huge amount of

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>money that's in Saudi Arabia are also turning a blind

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eye to the consequences of that deal, and that they

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are becoming accomplices to an authoritarian government that commits terrible

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>acts upon its own people. Company representatives for both Microsoft

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and Google have essentially said they're committed to protecting human rights,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but critics say that doesn't exactly align with them agreeing

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to do business in a country that has an undeniable

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>history of violating human rights. So yeah, it's it's hard

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to take these companies at their word when it's undeniable

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that the government has abused its power multiple times in

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>order to strike down any who would question that government's,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, authority or its practices. So yeah, pretty ugly stuff. Okay,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got a couple more stories to talk about before

0:21:55.800 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>we get to that. Let's take another quick break. So,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the Entertainment Software Rating Board or ESRB would very much

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>like to scan your face before you launch into that

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>play session of Doom. So, according to PC Gamer, the

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>ESRB and some partners it's working with are planning to

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>launch a tool that they're calling the Privacy Protective Facial

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Age Estimation. So the purpose of this would be to

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>determine if the person who's trying to buy a game

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>or to go through an in app purchase or activate

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>some other feature in the game that's meant for adults

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is actually of age that they're old enough to do

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that and not be violating some policy somewhere. And the

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>FTC is considering the measure and has opened up the

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>matter to public feedback and will continue to accept public

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>feedback until August two. First, so, if you're in the

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>United States and you have some thoughts about this, you

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>should probably go to the FTC's website and find the

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>page that is actually about this measure and leave your thoughts,

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in support or against. I'm not telling you

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>how to feel personally, I'm against it, but you know,

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I can also see why there is a call for this,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise you're requiring adults to take a very active

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>role in overseeing the types of stuff their children are

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>getting involved in. And while I think that's necessary, I

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>also think it's not always realistic, right, Like, even the

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>most loving parents are going to have issues following through

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with that because they have their own stuff they got

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. I assume I don't have kids, so

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have this issue. My dog isn't a gamer,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so I don't ever have to worry about this anyway.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 2>We have talked a.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Lot in this show about how facial recognition technology in

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>general has some really big problem and it makes me

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder how accurate the system really is? Right can it

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between say, a mature fifteen year old

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and a young looking eighteen year old, Because the eighteen

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>year old will be old enough to play games that

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>get like a mature rating, the fifteen year old would

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not be. How is this system going to be able

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell the difference reliably? Like sure, after a certain

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>age it might not have an issue, But for younger players,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like people who are of age but they look young,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be an issue. And it gets really invasive,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of privacy concerns obviously about this.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of weird. It reminds me a lot of

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>how in Japan there were companies that were making cigarette

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>vending machines and they were incorporating cameras and facial recognition

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>technology to try and prevent kids from being able to

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>buy cigarettes out of these machines. The kids just figured

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>they could hold up the face of an older person,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like a picture of a face of an older person,

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not the actual face that would have been really disturbing,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but a picture of a face, and that would be

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to fool the system. Supposedly, this this system they're

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about, would not be fooled by holding up a picture.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You would have to actually have a three dimensional face there.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But still it seems weird and invasive, And you know,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I get that the ESRB is trying to stay ahead

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>of governments from regulating the video game industry. That's the

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>whole purpose of the ESRB in the first place.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>If you don't.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Remember, back in the nineteen nineties, the video game industry

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as a whole formed the Entertainment Software Rating Board as

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a way to address government concerns that the video game

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>industry was creating games that would, you know, turn children

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>into total monsters because they would play Mortal Kombat and become,

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, gremlins or something. So the ESRB existed

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to give rating to these different games. Now

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like the ESRB is trying to come up

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>with ways to ensure that the people who are buying

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>games are actually old enough to do it, and maybe

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that's to head off any potential government regulation that would

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise enter into the industry, But in my opinion, this

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>particular move is not a good one. Finally, in some

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>NIDOS Science News, researchers at North Carolina State University created

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a gel like solution that lets them three D print

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>with metal at room temperature. So if you've never used

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a three D printer, generally speaking, three D printers work

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way where they take some sort of material,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like the one that I'm most familiar with is plastic,

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you get these filaments made of plastic. It's like

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a plastic wire almost, and you feed it through the

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>three D printer and it has a chamber that heats

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>up that the plastic melts into like a semi liquid state.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Then that ends up going through the three D printer

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>through the print head, which lays down a trail of

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this semi liquid stuff, which when it cools, it hardens

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and solidifies, and that's what lets you create three dimensional structures. However,

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're working with materials that have a much higher

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>melting point, it gets really hard to print with them, right,

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and metals typically have pretty high melting points, not all

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. You know, mercury doesn't, gallium doesn't, but others do,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and so they require more specialized equipment. When you're talking

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>about specialized equipment, well then you're talking about stuff getting

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, right, because if it has to be built

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>to certain parameters, then it gets to be expensive and

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you start to lose any advantages you get through being

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>able to three D print right from a financial standpoint anyway,

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so you might as well not do three D printing

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and use a more traditional and cheaper approach, even if

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>it's less efficient, because you're not going to spend as

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much money. While these researchers at North Carolina State University

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>came up with a way to print with copper that

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't involve heating the copper up to a melting point. Instead,

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they used copper particles that were in suspension in water,

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and they added to that suspension some hydrochloric acid, which

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>dropped the pH of the water down to one, and

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they added particles of utectic gallium indium alloy, and as

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of binding agent, they also added methyl cellulose

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and this created that gel like mixture which was liquid

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to go through a three D printer. They could

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>then print what was essentially a two dimensional shape using

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this mixture, but then by applying heat in specific ways,

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they could get a predictable reaction from the me It

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>would bend in ways that were predictable, so you would

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>print the shape. You would apply the heat at specific

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>points on this two dimensional shape, and as it would

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>heat up and dry, it would also change shape into

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was you wanted to make, and you would

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>get a three dimensional metallic object that's electrically conductive. So

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>really neat, Like you could make components to very specific

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, sizes and measurements using this approach instead of

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>having to make do with, you know, something that's off

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the shelf, but isn't you know, ideal for whatever use

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you need. As the object dry is the water and

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the act evaporate, so you are left behind with just

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a mix of those two metals plus the methyl cellulose

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of binding everything together. So it's really

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cool technology. I'm not sure when we will see like

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of practical uses of it, but it is

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty neat. That's it for today's news. I had a

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of other news items, but a lot of them

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are still developing, so I'm going to wait and maybe

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>cover them on Thursday when there's more to say. And

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope in the meanwhile that you are all well

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows