WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: The Numbers Behind Veterans, the Economy, and the Jewish Vote

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a numbers game with Brian Grudeski. Thank

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you all for being here again. I forgot to mention

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this on Monday show, but I want to thank all

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the veterans. It was Veterans Day on Tuesday. It's a

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>problem of mine where I just don't look at like

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>three days ahead and to see there's a big holiday.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So I missed saying it the day before. But Happy

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Veterans Data. All the veterans out there, thank you for

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your service for joining our armed forces and keeping our

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>nation free. I appreciate everything you have done and do

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, I hope you guys had a great day.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to briefly talk about some economic news before

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>doing a full ask Me Anything segment. So Goldman sachs

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Is estimated that the economy loss around fifty thousand jobs

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in October. Now that's not the official government data. Because

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>of the government shutdown, there was a delay getting out

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>the official data, so we don't know the official data yet,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but this is just an estimate. I'm going to do

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>an episode next week dedicated to the economy, and I

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>am going to have another whole episode on it AI

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>regulation on the government, which would be really really good.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think of lining up with a very impressive guest

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for that show, so that'll be next week. And I

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>got to get more on immigration because there's so much

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>immigration news. But I looked at my emails and I

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was backed up on asking me any things, and I

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, some of these questions are so dated. I

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have to just do a whole episode and kind of

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>empty the inbox because I really appreciate you guys. I

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you joining me asked Me Anything segment. By the way,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year, I'm going to bring

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on one of my old campaign buddies to discuss anything

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about running for office or you know, campaigns or like

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the meat and potatoes a campaign is not just like

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the overall idea of politics or a big meta issue,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but just like what it's like to work on a campaign,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how to run for office, all those real meat and

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>potato questions. I think you guys really enjoyed that episode

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>I did like early early in the year and when

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>my first episode. So I'm going to do it again.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys will be part of it and

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do a whole ask Me anything just about campaigns and

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>working in politics and what that whole thing is like.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So email me Ryan at Numbers Game podcast dot com.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan at numbers Plural Game podcast dot com. Put in

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the headline campaign episode. I'll be sure to answer all

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>those questions and then once again ask me anything because

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we do. We love this part of the show. It

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>really makes the whole entire podcast. You know about anything

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about you know, I feel like a dialogue. I'm not

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>just talking to a computer. So okay, here goes, ask

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>me anything for the day. So first question comes from

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>e cardialist. He says, my family took a trip to

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Washingt d C. About ten years ago. All of my

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>travel research and tourist books made a point to not

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>having a floor plan of the White House and stated

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that the location of the Oval Office has not been

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>released to the public. I actually did not know that.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>With the most with the recent ballroom outrage, I've seen

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of images that show the exact location, shape,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and size of the Oval Office. Until this week, I

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that it was in the White House. Rather,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it is in the West Wing. It wasn't in the

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>White House. It's in the West Wing. When did the

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>location of the Oval Office become something people didn't try

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to protect I actually had never heard of that before,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>because I I feel like there's models of the White

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>House that you could buy, and the West Wing is there,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Oval Office is there. I didn't I didn't

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know that that was not supposed to be public. I

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was. There was a movie called Civil

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>War that was released a couple of years ago. It

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was there was a war, obviously a civil war, a

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>new civil war, and they were invading the White House

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and they went through like door to door Florida, Florida

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to get to the west to the gets to the Oval.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was watching my buddy John mcintee, and John

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was Trump's body man and then the head of PPO

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>during the first term of the administration. And one thing

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>John said to me, I was like, Wow, they really

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>got this very accurate, Like this is extremely accurate the

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>layout of the White House. So I feel like it was.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was there, Like I feel like

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>people could have gotten a hold of it. I don't know,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe this was the one tour guy, or maybe this

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is the one book that says that the old Office

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is not located, but I feel like it probably was.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And about the outrage in general. Look, Dan Turntine said

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this on this podcast. Democrats fundamentally believe that we are

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in a fever dream that Trump will just go away

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if there's enough controversy, if there's enough protests, if there's

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>enough no King's rally that you know it's Russia or

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Epstein know the ballroom or anything like Liberals Finnament's believe

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>were just one more controversy away from wake up the

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>eyes of millions of people that this whole thing was

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>misguided and that will return to normalcy as they see it.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And if only they were focused on policies that make

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>them popular, they would be much further along to being

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>effective against him. Okay, next question, Hey, Ryan, Although I

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have a boy's name, I am actually a girl. What

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to start off a question. I am from

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the South and my parents give me my grandmother's made

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a name. Pause. So I have a Candida running for

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>office in the South and he has his grandmother's made

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a name. And apparently I did not know this, but

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>this is I learned this this year that that is

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a very common tradition in the South. I have to

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>say I really like it. I really like the idea

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>of honoring your maternal sides family by giving the first

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>name of the child to their last name. So the

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Candon's name is Morgan Murphy, and Morgan was his grandmother's

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>last name. Yes, his grandmother's last name, So that is

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very very cool. It's a very cool

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Southern tradition I just learned about. The question continues, why

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>do you think Democrats are holding out on the shutdown?

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>It is because the past the Republicans have given into

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>their temper tantrum. Can you please give us the numbers

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you're so talented at doing on past shutdowns and how

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they play out, whether Conservatives have given in play cared

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. Secondly, I know you want to Buck and

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Clay to discuss the Jewish vote. How has it changed

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>or not changed his October seventh, and how does it

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stand now now? And why could you do a longer

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>segment on that? Please? Rock Rock love that you are

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>at this question very very smart stuff. So I am

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss first the shutdown. Obviously it's over now,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think a big part of it that no

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one was really talking about was one was to juice

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the election in New Jersey and Virginia. I think there

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was a pure political thing right to give you langry,

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it really has to do with

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer's career. Rewind the date. What was being talked

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>about on September thirtieth, twenty twenty five that one of

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the big stories was a poll that had come out

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>from Pew Research, and it found that Schumer was the

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>most unpopular national politician in the country, more than John Thune,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>more than Donald Trump, more than JD. Vans, more than

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Hakim Jeffries. Schumer had a negative twenty nine percent approval rating.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But what made it worse for Schumer was that he

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was also underwater nationally with Democrats. He was at negative

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>four nationally among his own party. And that poll came

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>out several I guess, maybe like ten weeks or eleven

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks after. Another poll showed that AOC was beating Schumer

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York City if they went to a statewide primary,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But in the New York City, which is forty two

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of the state's populations in those five burrows in

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a head to head competition, Schumer was losing to AOC

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>by twenty one points in New York City, means that

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he'd have to make up a ton of votes out

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on Long Island and in the suburbs of New York

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up state in Westchester, Rockland, and then further in western

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. That's not a great place for Schumer to be.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>He was very worried, I think by the fact that

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats didn't believe he was up for the fight against Trump.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>That was often another number one thing cited it Schumer's

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not a fighter, so Schumer needed the narrative to change

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to fight. And I think that's

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>why you see more mainstream Democrats. I guess the term

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if we were in the UK would be backbenchers Schumer

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back benchers, people who side with the leadership most of

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the time. That's why they voted to continue the shutdown,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>which they wouldn't have done had had Schumer told them to,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, get rid of the shutdown, like let's keep

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing everything funded. They basically kind of go with

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what Schumer's cues are. That's why it's

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>believed that Schumer gave them the okay, enough of them

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>who are either retiring or they're not up for a

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>very long time to sit there and devote to end

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown with getting very little concessions from the Republican Party.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very rare except for Trump's term. It was very

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>rare before that for the Republican president to have a

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>government shutdown, especially with the Republican majority. I don't think

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Bush ever had them. So that's I mean, that's really

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>where I think a big part of it was. It

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was really Schumer trying to make a stand. Schumer trying

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to sit there and say, you know, look, I'm this

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>strong fighter, and I think things just got so bad

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>between the air flights being canceled and snap benefits and

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the rest of it that they ultimately caved,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which is more or less what the Democrats said. They

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>basically caved. My guess is that Schumer gave him the blessing,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>hoping he wouldn't get his prints on it, and of

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>course it went to a huge backlash. Congress and Rocannor

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and several other people are saying Schumer needs to step

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>aside his leader. I think this is the last ditch

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>effort to save Schumer's career, and I didn't think it's

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to work. I don't. As far as the Jewish

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>vot goes. I'm going to try to dedicate an episode

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to this later on the year because it's something that

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about. Here's the deal. Since October seventh, there's

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>only been two major elections, so I guess three major

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>elections right in New York City, Virginia, and New Jersey's governorship,

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>which saw a big left wing shift along across the board.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>New York City didn't really have a Republican running. We

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had a Republican running on the ticket, but his name

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>was on the ballot, but he It was basically a

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>moderate republic Democrat versus a left wing Democrat race. That's

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how the media branded it. So the Jewish vote was

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>very clearly aligned with Guomo there, so it's not really

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a good test case. In New Jersey, the Orthodox Jewish

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>vote was very strong for Chitarelly, extremely strong for Chitarelly.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the very few places that swung right

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>word from twenty twenty four. And as far as Virginia goes,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not really a heavy Jewish presences that they're in.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You get polling, accurate polling, don here's the problem with

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish vote as far as these studies that come

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one there is. There's a nonprofit I will think of

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the name of it, probably after this episode's over, that

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is a left wing nonprofit. And they immediately released the

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>first eggs of Poles right after the elections saying how

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish vote broke, but the Jewish vote always seems

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to break even more left wing than the previous election.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>They kind of manipulate the data and they given the

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>media eats it up because it's a good narrative the

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>media really wants. When you look at the Jewish vote,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're really breaking it into three different groups of people.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You're breaking into non religious Jews. Who are you know, secular,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.119
<v Speaker 1>who would be somebody like a fran Drusher, a Jerry Seinfeld,

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a Woody Allen, somebody who they are a fran Leeblitz.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They are Bill Maher, I guess is half Jewish. They

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are Jewish in the sense of their birth or their circumstances,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really influence their politics all that much.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a special attachment to Israel. They are

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just they're just Jewish. So when and they for the

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>longest time where the all huge teche of the Jewish

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>population in America, probably most of the majority. So when

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone would say, oh, the Jewish votes not moving, well,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they vote like non religious, college educated whites. Well, that

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most left wing groups in America.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Then there's also the Then there's the conservative Jews. This

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is like conservative or Orthodox. Those are two separate things,

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if you know Judaism, but I'm going to lump them

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in together. Politically, they tend to vote, you know, much

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>more Republican than the secular Jews do. But that would

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be something like a Ben Shapiro, right. They are when

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they are Republicans. I have found they are the most

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent Republicans. They are of the Jewish population. They are

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very consistently. I'm a Republican. I vote Republican very very

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>very like down the line constantly. And then the last

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>group is the like ultra Orthodox, the Hasidum. They are

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the ones who wear you know, the outfits and the

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>hats and that where the fur. Their wives have wigs

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. They live in cloister community where they don't

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of the outside of the Jewish community.

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll see them in Borough Park or a curious joal

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York or Lakewood, New Jersey. They tend to

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>vote for how the rabbis want. And I know it's

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>like a very controversial thing to sit there and say,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>but they do block vote based upon rabbi endorsements. That's

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>why the rabbi's endorsements are so important, because they have

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>huge voters to turnout. They turn out at maximum level

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in every election for doll catcher or for president, doesn't matter,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and they have a huge interest in having certain things

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>granted from the state. I will tell you I went

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to an Asidic This is the craziest thing in the world.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I went to a Hasidic a meeting with acidic Jews

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Hassidic rabbis in Brooklyn, and they were asking about education

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>issues because I run the seventeen seventy six project pack.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And I guess to the place and it looked like

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a doctor's office. It looked so strange. It looked like

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a doctor's office or like a like a call center,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like I couldn't make out what where I was. And finally,

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>because it was like a waiting room. But then there

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was rows of Jewish women, you know, having someone in

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>front of them, sitting next to them doing phone calls

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to somebody or other, and having computers. So I finally

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>got to meet with the rabbis and I asked the

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>person who brought me, who is not a rabbi but

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is Jewish, said to them, where am I? Like, what

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is this place? I've never seen something of this before

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in my life. And they said, oh, this is where

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we signed everyone up for Medicaid and Social Security benefits.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>And the Republican voice in my head wanted to sit

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there and scream like crazy. And it was really funny

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>because when the snap benefits were ending and they were

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>having a bunch of people, you know, who were definitely

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>able bodied in my opinion, going on the news to say,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at my hungry kids and they have

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like the nice nails, and they have new iPhones, and

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they probably shouldn't be on welfare benefits and we should

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>probably have better ways of monitoring welfare benefits and they

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have six kids by who knows. That same friend who

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>brought me to the call center was like, this is ridiculous.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>People be working, and I said, that's exactly what I

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>thought about all those people at that Medicaid call center

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that he brought me to. Anyway, those that voting block

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>votes extremely one way or the other. So like that's

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>when you'll see like these elections where it's Trump, you know,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven to two, and then down ballot it will

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be a Democrat like ninety five to like three. Like

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it will be one way or the other, and they

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have no loyalty to party. It's really an issues based thing.

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They tend to vote Republican federally and Democrat locally in

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Okay, so I've made to a whole episode

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on this, but I just get, you know, with everything

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about I feel tremendously bad for my Jewish friends and

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for my friends who are Zionists who feel like they

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are under a constant attack and duress. And it's led

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to a place where having an honest conversation good and bad,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult without feeling like you're kind of piling

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on to a very unfair moment. I would like to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>go into the Jewish vote one day, though, and maybe

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>break it down. I'll have one of my friends who's

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Jewish to sit there and works in Jewish politics, sit

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there and really discuss and break it down. But maybe

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll do a lot of it because it is fascinating.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very interesting. Okay, speaking of Jews. Next question comes

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from Joel. I don't know Joel is Jewish, but the

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>questions about Jews, okay? And Joel says, suppose Israeli Prime

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Minister Netanya, who visits New York City and now Mayor Mandanni,

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>has him arrested on war crimes, what federal laws or

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>doctrines would apply. Could Mandanni himself be arrested under the

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Logan Act for interfering with foreign affairs? Or would it

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just not happened? Thanks for engaging with your audience so thoughtfully.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You've definitely got a loyal listen here. Oh thank you, Joel.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of you. So it's a great question. Netnia,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>who has a warrant for his arrest under the International

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Crime Criminal Court for crimes against humanity and soon to

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be Mayor Mandannie, has said over and over he plans

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on arresting him if he comes to New York City.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Legal experts say that he doesn't really have the authority.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I look this up because I'm not a lawyer and

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't pretend to play one. So this comes from

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>India Today and the Time Times magazine. It says the

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>United States is not a signatory on the International Criminal Court,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>which means the ICC has no jurisdiction within the US territory.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>As Times reported after interviewing Mandannie, several federal laws would

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>be would obstruct any local attempt to execute an international

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>arrest warrant. The US Constitution gives the federal government authority

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>over foreign affairs, a power repeatedly upheld by the American courts.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>In practice, this means that even if the New York

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>City authorities were to attempt to detain Yahoo, federal agencies

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>would override that move. Mendanni himself acknowledged these limits during

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>his Zeno interview. He said, quote, I'm going to operate

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>within the bounds of the law on not Donald Trump

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>seeking to create my own legal system. Of course, he's

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>got to hit Trump, but this at the time of

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrating Benjamin Yahoo in the city from those in the

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>leading political positions, has come to an end. So he

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. I mean, that's basically the long law

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and short of it. He can't do it. And I

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>think that he knows he can't do it. It's just

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>him being a union know what. Okay. Tristan Shelby writes

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about the elections turnout was definitely the main issue, but

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the shutdown and lack of focus on cost

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of living and inflation by Trump and the White House

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>played it a role too. Seems like Trump and Jdvans

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are aware that these about these issues. Hopefully they'll immediately

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>focus on it. I would look into pushing care for

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>leaf checks before Christmas to make more of the public

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on board with tariffs and help give extra income during

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the holiday season. I would like to raise a minimal wage.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a winning issue and I would take away take

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>away from the damas, but doubt this establishment GOP will

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be on board. Looking forward to Thursday's podcast. Okay, so

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, and I don't mean to sound like

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a libertarian, because you know I can't stand libertarians. Here

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>is the thing about the minimal wage. Worker scarcity creates

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>higher and minimum wages. Right, if you have less foreign

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>workers being pumped into the country, the minimal wage will

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>rise naturally, especially for people with low skills. Right. There's

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>no minimum wage conversation happening among doctors or nurses or

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>educated class. It's really the uneducated population, not uninformed uneducated.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a difference, but people without a college degree,

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>who are working blue collar jobs or are they're working

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>service jobs, that protecting those workers is of the most importance,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and other ones really feeling the tremendous exhaustion of the

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>last five years of inflation and constant spending. I mean,

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that the two thousand dollars check idea is

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>would be popular, but our deficit is so large, our

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>debt is so large that anything that we could do

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>to bring that down will help reduce inflation over time.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>It is more essential to bring down the deficit and

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the debt than to worry about these two thousand dollar

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>checks that will help the working class more over the

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>long term. And I know if you're listening, I know

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're hungry, you don't think about the long term.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I know if you have credit card payments and you're

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>looking at Christmas and I know you're not thinking of

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the long term. I get it. I completely understand. I've

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>been broke at times. I know what that feels like,

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I know how tough it can be, and I know

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what a two thousand dollars track would mean for a

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. So I'm not discouraging that. I'm just

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of a bigger policy issue, saying how

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>do we help Americans and the best way is to

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>reduce the deficit. It will bring down inflations. I'm not

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really for that, although I understand him doing this. In

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>my opinion on the ADMIN in the last few months

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is they Trump ha spent a lot of time looking

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>at overseas and international issues, which is very common for

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>second term presidents. Right you have Clinton who did it

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in Israel. Bush, I mean, I guess this whole entire

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>second term was dealt with with foreign policy issues, but

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Iraq War mainly, and then you had Obama with

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to do the Iran deal. Like second terms are

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes for legacy making historical foreign policy accomplishments, and President Trump,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, it has a number of them. But

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said in the post election podcast, because you

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>saw this swing both among white working class voters and

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Latino voters who are of a similar economic level, similar

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>economic indicators, I think economics played a more significant role

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>than people. And Republicans are are willing to admit. Inflation

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is down from Biden years, but prices aren't down, which

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know if you're struggling three years ago. Because inflation

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was very high. Unless you've got a significant raise, you're

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>probably still struggling. Unemployment for young people is very high

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. If you're in your fifties and you got

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid to graduate at college, I'm sure you're sitting

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>there with a lot of anxiety of how they can

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>get a job. Credit card debt is that its highest

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>amount ever. Q three of twenty twenty five was over

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars. People are really struggling, and I think

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>there's anger because Trump was known to be so successful

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in this first time on the economy, they were hoping

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he could just change it all immediately. Polls find that

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump is so severely underwater. When it comes to inflation,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's negative twenty six points. And when you ask voters,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this is in the polls. If you ask voters who

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>do you blame on affordability and unaffordability, really Americans say

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump over Biden fifty four to twenty one. He is

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the president. So that's who people blame. And is it

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>should be a concern for Republicans because they are in power,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and people blame the people in power. It's just how

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it works, even if it's not fair, even if some

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of this problems predate Trump's first term, even if a

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of it happened right after COVID and because of

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>COVID heavy lies the crown. It's just how the voters

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>see things. So we'll be back with more. Ask me

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>anything after this. All right, back to ask me anything.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>This question comes from Bill. He says, I know you're

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not an electional lawyer. I'm not even a college graduate,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>but I saw this on Twitter and thought it was

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting way to challenge it. I can get a lot

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of attention. It's about the Virginia redistricting push. The rule

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>require of the amendment to pass through the legislator before

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an election and again after. But the election was ongoing,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of vote were cast because of mail

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>in ballads under the VIA law. Is this before an election?

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems wrong? Okay, I'm not an election lawyer. I

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>did look this up a little bit, and technically it

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is before an election because it's an election day, I'm sure,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's an interesting debate, and who knows how a

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>judge would rule, So I don't know. I mean, it

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>seems like election day is the marker, not when early

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>ballots are being mailed I guess it's an interesting way

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of considering it. I couldn't find anything online, any resource

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>online that showed that this had been argued before, and

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots obviously have been greatly expanded since COVID.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. If this does go through, Democrats will

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>likely pick up three more seats in Virginia from the

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans through redistricting efforts. You know, Republicans when the registioning

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 1>is stuff started. This is definitely the falsiest move by

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>any of the legislators now that I'm thinking about it.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But when the registionings starts, Republicans, we're having this big advantage,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but losing what we're going to lose in Virginia and

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what we lost in California, and seeing how the districts

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are being changed, it's going to be very I mean,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans may only come out with one or two more

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>season they went in with, depending what Florida, Indiana, and

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Kansas do. Unless SCOTUS strikes down Section two of the

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Voting Rights Act in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, unless

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they start immediately going to the redistricting, it's going to

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be a very very you know, big question of did

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>they gain very much at all. I mean maybe they

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gained like one or two seats, but it's not enough

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to deflect from a blue wave, like it won't be

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to stop a blue wave from crashing. I mean,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll save a few seats, but not that many. A

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>big question really remains for what DeSantis does in Florida,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because he could redistrict Democrats out of four seats in

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Florida pretty easily as long as the Hispanic vote doesn't

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>retract significantly. And obviously the Hispanic vote in Florida is

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>differently than the Hispanic vote everywhere else in the country.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens in Florida, see what happens

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas. But between Virginia and California, it's not very

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>faitable for Republicans unless the VRA is struck down. I

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>would say overall, if it's not struck down, you're looking

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>at maybe two or three one or two seats extra

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>game for Republicans. If it is struck down, you might

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more. And if it's limited, it's like Louisiana,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Alabama or the court cases were maybe like four seats

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I mean that's that was the gamble that

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans took. They're going to come up with a little

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of an advantage, but not enough to stop a blue

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>wave if it crashes through a country next November. Okay,

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>next question, And you guys know I am terrible pronouncing names,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so I apologize ahead of time. Per drawl our karia,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I know I butchered that, and whoever you are, I

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>am so sorry forgive me. I'm from Queens, New York.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't breathe through my nose. I don't say ours correct.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on a lot of you know, handicaps right now,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sorry. The email says huge fan of your work.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I am currently here in Florida, not a US citizen,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>just a permanent resident. I felt terrible by the election

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>day result and I was following you before to kind

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of you before, so kind of was expected. What I

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>realized is that we were losing by eleven in Wisconsin

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>during the Supreme Court race. Was there any races that

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>were precursors to the two governors races? That's a great question,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And once again, p Jwall, I am sorry I was

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>saying your name incorrectly. That's a great question, though I

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think there was any singular race, but there was

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely a question over voter intensity. If you look at

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all the precursor special elections that were happening, both on

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the state legislative level and the congressional level, you could

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>see Democrat intensity was really very, very high, higher than

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it had been almost ever in recent times. You have

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona seventh congressional race where Democrats did thirteen points

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>better than they did last year, Florida's first where they

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>did seventeen points better, Florida's six where they did nineteen

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>points better, and Florida Sorry, Virginia eleven, where they did

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteen points better. So there were all those special elections

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>where Democrats were doing between thirteen to nineteen points better

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>than they had done in twenty twenty four. That's not

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>because those districts. Those were all safe districts, by the way,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans and Democrats didn't flipping of those districts. It

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>was just that the voter intensity by their own party

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was so heavy. I mean, it is this issue of

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>complacency among voters. When your parties in the White House,

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you think you know the president's got it, I'm going

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to sleep in. I just, you know, campaigned and voted

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for this guy who won, So why am I going

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to get out there? And that really started to show

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the signs that there was something kind of brewing. There's

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>also a ton of local state legislative races where Democrats

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>way outperform numbers. I'm not going to go through all

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of them because there was dozens, but it definitely showed

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that the trend was in democrats favor. I don't know

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's any signs specifically the Latino and working white vote,

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>working like coll ass blue collar vote. I'm nothing that

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I can see from those things, but definitely the signs

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of voter intensity was clear on display. I think people

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>are just kind of ignoring it because the old adage is, oh,

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, these special elections, they don't decide anything. That's

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just a special election, which is true until it's not

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>until it is predictive. Okay, This last question for this

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>episode comes from Joseph. He says, Hey, Ryan, I'm a

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>big fan of your work as a Trump voter. I

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>feel like he has been disappointing on a lot of

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>key policy issues. Do you think he's getting bad advice

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>from Susie Wilds, Brooke Rowans, and Howard Lutnick side of

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the adamant Okay, this is an interesting question. So I

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>am not a personal fan of several members of the administration.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think other people do a very very good job.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Susie Wilds, I give a lot of credit to is

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a tough job to be any chief of staff, to

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>be Trump'sjuba staff, It's extremely difficult, right, It's not easy,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>no easy gig. And she's a woman of a particular

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>age who doesn't allow for many leaks or any leaks

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>really to go through this White House. And I think

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>she's done a very good job at managing the situation

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to the best of her abilities. Howard Lonik I don't

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of positive things to say about him,

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and Brooke Rowlin's the same. That being said, I think

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that it's just more than the people that we know.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people who come in and

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Trump's orbit who influence them, who sit there

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and say this thing or that thing. You know, they

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>constantly being peddled about the deportations and the tariffs, and

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things that are very much people

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>pushing Trump on this issue or that issue. So I

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's just the people that we know. And

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>more times than not, in my experience working in politics,

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>both from the journalism side and the political side, a

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of times it's not the people that you know.

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember back in twenty seventeen, I sent this tweet

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>out and I wrote, I think I wrote a story

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about it, but I was getting calls from inside the

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>White House, my sources inside the West Wing who were saying,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>these are the people who were really against Trump, and

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.239
<v Speaker 1>they've all been shown themselves as prominent never trumpers. They

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>were even they've been the guy who wrote that book, Anonymous,

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>who wrote that op ed for the New York Times.

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>He was on my list as somebody who was against

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the White House. No one knew. I mean,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a very famous person. I think. Listen, it's

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>been a rough couple weeks with headlines from the Trump administration.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that. And Trump did not make it easier

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on his supporters. From the Lori Ingram interview, I'm not

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not gonna pretend and say, oh no,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>everything is going fine. Look away, look away, look away,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not my role, it's on my job. I'm here

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to have an honest conversation with my listeners. I think

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's important to sit there and say, one,

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no politician is perfect, and you're never going to get

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of what you want. So, as somebody

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>who was a Day one Trump supporter, let's look at

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting. Right. Deportations are happening. Five hundred thousand

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and two million self Deportation's great, fantastic, And he's not

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>backing down, which there's all the effort in the world

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to back down right now. And he's not backing down.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>On foreign policy, he's been pretty good. You know, we

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten more into more interventionist wars, and there was

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>every incentive to do it. So I want that to

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be very clear. On the economy, it's struggling and I'm

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if there is an easy way

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to get out of it. We may have tougher times

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of us before we are in the clear. And

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>part of that is a change in the American economy,

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in part because of AI and how that's changing the economy,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in part because of worries over how tariffs have been issued.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's been all over the place. I will admit that,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm supportive in general of tariffs, I think

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that they have been all over the place. The messaging

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has been a disaster. Everyone's got a different answer for everything.

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Scott has said is doing a really good job,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>though with a treasury much better than what's doing. And

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that the economy is the

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>main issue. I know it's easy and I did this

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot during term one, right, blaming everyone around Trump

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for Trump's shortcomings, and sometimes they are. You know, there

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are people who in his ear who are giving him

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>better device it's one hundred and ten percent. But at

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, Trump is Trump, right, He's not.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>He is a great politician because he is not nailed

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to strict ideology. Unfortunately, that includes his own ideology that

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he creates and that he campaigns on. So I think

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not been a perfect administration. I think that there's

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of hiccups and misplacements and kind of

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>got lost after the first four months of just one

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>win after the other, win after the other win. I

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to that earlier's place. But I

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think a lot more commitment. Is going to need it

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on the economy right now because it's really really struggling.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where voters really their minds are. So anyway,

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that question. I really appreciate it. Monday,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back with a full episode I think on

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy, but it might be an AI, it'd be

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the other though. We're going to a great episode.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And please, I mean more questions on asking me anything.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryan at numbers gamepodcast dot com. I always appreciate it.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for listening. Please like and subscribe on YouTube,

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast, wherever you get your podcasts.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you all. Thank you. Have a great weekend.