WEBVTT - Trump Orders US Agencies to Drop Anthropic After Pentagon Feud

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy, plus global business finance and tech news

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>President Trump directed US government agencies to stop using Anthropics products,

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>capping a feud between the AI Giant and the Pentagon

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>over safeguards on its technology. The President said before four

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>o'clock today, right, there would be a six month quote

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>phase out period for agencies, including the Defense Department, that

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>are using Anthropics products. I thought, and we're going to

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>bring up his tweet in a second. Here is the

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>left true social not a tweet. I'm sorry. The left

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>wing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a disaster mistake

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>trying to strong arm the Department of War and force

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 2>them to obey their terms of service instead of our constitution.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Their selfishness is putting American lives at risk.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Meantime, we've also seen, according to Axios, saying that Anthropic

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and the Pentagon are still negotiating a deal is still

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 3>That was after the president's post on Social Access reporter

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>citing a source on Anthropic and Pentagon in an ex post,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know clock ticking though here.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, fortunately we got Katrina Manson back with US's Bloomberg

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 2>News reporter who covers tech in national security. She's also

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 2>the author of the forthcoming book Project Maven, a Marine

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Colonel his Team in the Dawn of AI Warfare. The

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>book comes out next month, but you can pre order

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>it now. She joins us from New York. Katrina, congratulations

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>on the book. I'm looking forward to reading it. I

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>know it's been a long project, but it's totally related

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>to exactly what you have been reporting on in recent

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>weeks and sharing with us on our program, the back

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and forth that Carol and I just had. Where is

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>this Anthropic Pentagon relationship right now?

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's very significant that the President's weighed in and

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 4>called this directive. But of course you're quite right to

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>say that, to indicate this is the man who knows

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>the art of the deal, and things are going to

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>keep going unraveling. Anthropic over the course of six months

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>will be extremely complicated. They're in the tech stack, they're

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>in the intelligence community, they are used in combat operations

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>on Maven's smart system, which is a Palenteer system. It's

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 4>not impossible to replace them, and of course the President

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>is suggesting a six month phase out, and even Anthropic

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 4>when they gave their very strong statement yesterday said we

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 4>will help if the choice is to remove us, we

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 4>will make sure that transition is smooth. And then you've

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 4>got now Warner calling in from the Senate Intelligence Committee

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>suggesting this is a politicized attack, and of course the

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 4>president they'd call them left wing nutjobs, so he is

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 4>concerned that this is not really a debate about the

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 4>future of war, but a jostling for position over which

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 4>company gets what. And if the Axios report is correct,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't have separate reporting to that, then this could

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>be still part of that process, Haig Seth. Of course,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>the Secretary.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 5>Of War or Defense had given.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Us until five oh one, so we'll also still be

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 4>waiting to see if the Defense Department wants to weigh in.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think about national security with all of

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 3>this stuff AI, you name it, you know, raw materials, everything,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and I just think about if this comes undone is

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>that a loss for national security for the United States.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 4>It's quite hard to work out the ways in which

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>the US military machine is dependent on AI at the moment. Well,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 4>that's what I've been trying to do in this book, honestly,

0:03:56.120 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 4>and it has threaded through of course LLMS and gentic AI.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>This is something that is being rapidly adopted but also

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 4>really really unknown and unreliable in many cases. So the

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 4>military and the intelligence community, both of them in terms

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 4>of national security, have been experimenting from pretty early on

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>after that first moment when chat GPT was launched back

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 4>in when it was at November twenty twenty three, and

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>they have started really trying to develop their own systems. Obviously,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic is the interesting one because they're on the classified cloud.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 4>They found a way to do it, and they were

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>threaded through a number of systems, mostly helping things run

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 4>faster if you imagine an enterprise service, but just happening

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 4>in a classified way, really trying to draw on data

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>points and make things go swifter, quicker, connect things smatter

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 4>through bureocracy in that sense, that could slow national security down.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 5>But of course, the.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Thing they said that they were worried about wasn't politics,

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 4>it was autonomy. They didn't want their tools being involved

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 4>in autonomous warfare because they're not ready. And we were

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 4>increasingly beginning to hear from military leaders, not just the

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 4>campaigners who you would expect to have a problem with this,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 4>like stop killer robots, but actually the former leader, the

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 4>former director of Project maeven Jack Shanahan, who's a retired

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 4>three star general, said look, lms are not ready for

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 4>prime time. He put that post out yesterday and just

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 4>said this technology isn't ready yet, which is very much

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 4>in line with what Anthropic had been saying.

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to the Axios. We have

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a follow read through on this.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic and the Pentagon still negotiating ahead of the Pentagon's

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>five oh one pm ET deadline, are reached deal. Citing

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>a source familiar, Axios goes on to say, if no

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>deal has reached, Defense Secretary Pete Hexath's plans to declare

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic a supply chain risk, there's five oh one deadline,

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Might it, Katrina be extended? What where did this deadline?

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 3>You can talk deadline in the past, you know deadlines

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>can move.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, so much of this is performative, as we've

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 4>seen a lot of very loud public statements, as we

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 4>actually have learned the disagreement on paper comes down to

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 4>the term as appropriate. There have been letters going backwards

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 4>and forwards, so we've been told that are about whether

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 4>human judgment will be used over the use of force

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 4>in an autonomous situation. And we had Emil Michael talking

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 4>to Bloomberg TV much more cool headed than he was

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 4>last night. Last night he was calling dari Amadee a

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 4>liar and saying he had a god complex. This morning

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>with Bloomberg, he was saying, look, talks are carrying on.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 4>So I think, of course this is a negotiation. They've acknowledged.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 4>I think in multiple ways that they're really dependent on

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Claude and that thought is really good and they want

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.679
<v Speaker 4>to keep using it. Claud doesn't want to be involved

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 4>in autonomy, and I was learning, of course that if

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 4>the department pushes ahead but autonomy in the way it

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 4>wants to do, it could be quite hard to have

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 4>one system that allows autonomy and another that doesn't touch

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 4>autonomy that Claude would be on.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 6>So they do need to work out.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Exactly what their red lines are. Even if they're coming

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 4>to a much softer accommodation behind closed doors now. But

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, with the President weighing in and with heg

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Seth maintaining this position, there's no reason to think they

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>will reach a deal at five oh one.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So, Katrina, just in the last twenty seconds that we

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>have with you, when I was on my way home yesterday,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>this crossed. It was just minutes after you were on

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>our program talking about it, but it said it was

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>this post from anthropics Dario Amiday saying that the company

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>cannot accede to the Department of Defense. Did you learn

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>anything just in thirty seconds. Did you learn anything new

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in that post last night?

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Here, I've got it right in front of me.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I thought there was a very interesting part of it,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 4>a detail to pick out, which is we've offered to

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 4>work directly with the Department of War on R and

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 4>D to improve the riability of these systems that they

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 4>have not accepted this offer. I thought that was very interesting.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 5>They are saying, we want.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>To help you use this while technology in a reliable way,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 4>and you help us help.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 3>You, which is similar to what the Undersecretary of Defense

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 3>at earlier this morning.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 5>You go to a dinner party.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>You want to sit to somebody, you want to sit

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 3>next to somebody like Katrina.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna put that out there.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>US Live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, that's the latest on the US economic picture.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to two companies looking at our economy and

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the issue of affordability, especially when it comes to housing

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and really the ability to own a home. As we

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 3>know home ownership in the US, it offers stability, it's

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 3>an offer, a way to create wealth.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 7>And this is a really big part of the American dream.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I laugh, but it's not funny because a lot of

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>people between US home prices outpacing wages. It's made it

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 3>really difficult for many to afford a home in the

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>United States.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, two companies are looking to address that. We're talking

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 2>about Compass and Rocket Companies. The two announced to a

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>three year strategic alliance aimed at expanding home listing inventory

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to create a significantly enhanced and affordable home buying and

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 2>selling experience for American family.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, we wanted to know more. Also, we should

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 3>point out our next two guests. Both of them had

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>earnings last night. Compast shares are a little bit lower

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the company forecast first quarter revenue, the top analyscet testaments,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and shares of Rocket rallying after the mortgage finance company

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 3>posted revenue and adjusted profit for the fourth quarter that

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>beat the average analyst estimate, which.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 7>Means we're going to get to the macro as well.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>With us in studio, Robert Refkin, he's founder, chairman and

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Compass International Holdings, and Varun Krishna, President and

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>CEO Rocket Companies, both joining us here in studio. Welcome,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>like you are the perfect guests to have right now

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 3>with so much going on, I want to talk about

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the partnership though, and how it gets to the affordability issue.

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 7>Let's go right there. Robert, who whatever wants to kick it.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 5>Off, please go ahead. So let's get it.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 9>Look what this represents is the number one largest brokerage

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 9>in the world, Compass three hundred and forty thousand agents,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 9>nine brands Compass, Corcoran, So the Best, Caldel Banker, Beterhomes

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 9>and Garden e A Central twenty one, Christie's and ad

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 9>Properties partnering with the largest mortgage company in the world

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 9>to help sellers by giving them something they've never had before,

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 9>which the ability to market their homes to sixty million

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 9>buyers without days on market and price drop history. Ultimately,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 9>there's a risk to listing negative insights that are on

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 9>listings that we are taking off the listing so for

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 9>the first time so that they can market without risks.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 9>There should not be these artificial barriers.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, come on in here, because if we think about affordability,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what we hear over and over again from

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 2>economists is, yeah, mortgage rates matters matter. You know, it

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>matters how much people are are thinking about buying and

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>their salaries and how they think about affordability. But it

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>really has to do with supply and if we're not

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>building more homes in places where people want to live,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 2>we're just not going to make a dent. How do

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you do it if you're not a builder.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a very complicated problem, and I think

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 10>it's really important that industry participates and does its part,

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 10>and the purpose of this partnership is really to attack

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 10>affordability in two ways. The first one is inventory. As

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 10>Robert shared, we plan to bring as a result of

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 10>this partnership, five hundred thousand to a million listings to

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 10>the market that are not accessible and.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 5>So why aren't they accessible Because part.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 10>Of the issue is that certain sites provide access to

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 10>these private exclusives and coming soon listings, and these are

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 10>inventory that really comes down to a more flexible way

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 10>for sellers to be able to advertise their home. And

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 10>what we think is that everyone is really focused on

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 10>the buyer. That's obviously a very important side of the equation,

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 10>but in some ways the entire world is forgotten about

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 10>the other side of the equation, and that's the seller.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 10>And so this partnership first is focused on the seller.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 10>It's about lowering the barrier to entry so that more

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 10>listings can be advertised online on redfin and on Compass.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 10>That's one side of the equation. The second side of

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 10>this is a mortgage partnership, and that's where we are

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 10>building a more integrated platform for buyers so that buyers

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 10>that use Rocket Mortgage, that use Compass can actually save money.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 10>They can get up to six thousand dollars in closing

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 10>costs coverage. They can save up to one percent on

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 10>payments for the first year. And so it's a very

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 10>multifaceted challenge to fix affordability. But what's great about this

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 10>partnership is it fixes things for both buyers and sellers

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 10>on both sides of the ecosystem.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>But I got to ask, you know, one of the

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 3>things that Tim and I we've covered this a lot

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>in terms of affordability, and yes, it's some of it

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 3>is buying homes, affordable homes where they are needed.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 7>It's not just buying homes.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing is a lot of folks have

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>said we need to pay people more, that it's an

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>income thing, So like, are you guys going to give mortgages?

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Are you changing your metrics in terms of income and

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 3>so and so forth? Qualifies yeah, because that gets to

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the affordability issue too.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think, look, the reality is affordability,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 10>as you said, is much more than just supply and demand,

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 10>although supplying demand are probably the major ways to.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 8>Attack the problem.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 10>But a part of this is you have to have

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 10>more ways to qualify people you have alternative ways to

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 10>look at things like credit. You have to think about reform,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 10>you have to think about wage.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about self employed?

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 10>We have diversified the way that we look at our population.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, you look at things like the creator economy,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 10>you look at the self employed economy. So you have

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 10>different ways that people make income, have credit, and it's

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 10>really important I think to acknowledge that and to diversify

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 10>the way you qualify folks.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 2>So the idea big picture is you increase supply, you

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>get more homes listed out there, it frees up inventory

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>for people to buy that first home.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 9>Robert, But yeah, go ahead, So you mentioned developers and holders. Look,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 9>unfortunately that will just take too long. If we attack

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 9>the builder side, that will take two years to have

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 9>even the most modest impact. The bigger impact is not

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 9>really where you play. The bigger impact exactly what we

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 9>play on both. But the bigger impact is on existing

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 9>home sales, and that's where there's there's been less inventory

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 9>because so many homeowners locked into low mortgage rates and

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 9>they don't want to lose that low mortgage rate to

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 9>transfer to a six.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 11>Percent mortgage rate.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 9>So the way to expand the existing home sale market

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 9>is to reduce the bearers to entry. And so let

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 9>me give you some examples. Yeah, why do sellers say

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 9>when's the right time to list? There shouldn't. There shouldn't

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 9>be a right time to list. But they're worried about

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 9>days on market? Why is there a fear of what

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 9>price should we go at? Well, there shouldn't be a

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 9>price drop history. That shouldn't be a conversation. You know,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 9>my wife would never want to sell her home, but

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>do you ask her is there a price you'd sell

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 9>your home?

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 11>Yes, there's a price, there's always a price.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But don't those histories inform the potential seller? Doesn't that

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>data show and help inform a buyer? Doesn't that provide

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>more information to the market.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 9>So look, if I were buying your company, I would

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 9>love your investment banker told me how long you've been

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 9>trying to sell your company and how many times you

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 9>drop the price. But that's not what I'm buying. That's

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 9>a negotiating point for leverage. If buyers deserve to know price,

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 9>job history and days and market sellers to deserve to

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 9>know how long has that buyer been searching, how many

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 9>times they put in office that fell through and fell

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 9>out a contract. And so we believe if you the buyer,

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 9>what you need is you need more inventory. So to

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 9>help you the buyer, the best thing that we can

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 9>do is just let the seller sell however they want.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 11>And if we do that, they'll be more inventory.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 3>So then wait a minute, So then now does the

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 3>seller have more information or you're just getting rid of

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it and it's just kind of a through.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 11>We're just getting rid of it for the first time.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 5>So you just listed and you go.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 9>If you go to Australia, the word days on marketing

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 9>and price job history are not on the sites. They

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 9>don't exist. The reason why is that system was built

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 9>for sellers here. It was built because everyone's forced to

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 9>put in the MLS. It was built for buyers. And

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 9>so we're just trying to bring the pendulum back and

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 9>give individual homeowners the same advantages as the builders. Builders

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 9>market without days on marketing, price jop history. So we

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 9>should give homeowners the same opportunity.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 3>What makes you so sure this is going to work

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the affordability, because I also wonder if

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you remove some of that information. To Tim's point, if

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>there have been price drops that ultimately brings down the

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 3>cost of the price of housing.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 7>But if you don't have that and it.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Just kind of stays and maybe doesn't really indicate what's

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 3>happening at the broader market, Doesn't that lead to price appreciation,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 3>and that doesn't get to the affordability.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 10>I think there's two things to point out. I think

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 10>the first thing is I think no one can disagree

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 10>that today there is no inventory right Like, we have

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 10>an issue with the way the system works today, which

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 10>is that we looked at some redfinn data and so

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 10>half of the homes that are listed right now have

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 10>been on the market for sixty days plus. So we

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 10>have a lot of stale inventory. You don't have a

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 10>lot of new inventory.

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 3>So I spend my neighborhood because I like to check

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 3>and keep an eye inter there's.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 10>There's not much inventory is coming on market. And so

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 10>to me, it's less about some of these metrics. It's

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 10>more just like, how do you create more inventory? More

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 10>inventory it creates more competition, it reduces scarcity, and that

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 10>creates pricing advantage. So the bigger picture for us is

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 10>just how do you attack the supply problem? Because without sellers,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 10>you're not going to have buyers and every seller ends

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 10>up being a buyer. And that's really what we're focused

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 10>on here.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Robert, you're a data driven guy. How do you measure

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>if this actually works? Like, what's the metric?

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 11>We will see more inventory come to the market.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 2>How much more inventory?

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 9>Before restrictions came into the industry through something called clear Cooperation,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 9>which forced every individual American homeowner to put their listening

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 9>in MLS after twenty four hours, ninety percent of our

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 9>listing started off outside of the MLS system. And when

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 9>that rule came into effect, we saw less inventory. And

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 9>so I can't give you the exact number, but we will.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 9>We will see how much more inventory we will bring

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 9>to the market and we'll share that.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 11>With the public.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 7>Will this work in any rate environment?

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely?

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 9>Just there should be no fear to list, There should

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 9>be no downside to list, There should be no barrier

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 9>to list. You should be able to list however you want.

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 9>Do you want to not disclose the price sin say

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 9>price spawn request? Do you want to have how many

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 9>photos you want? You want to have no photos? Do

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 9>you want to have an address that just this fifth

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 9>Avenue luxury penouse without seeing the exact unit? Number whatever

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 9>you want. If you take away all those bears, you

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 9>will have more inventory.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Help me understand too, What does this do to the

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 3>selling process the real estate agents who are selling properties,

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 3>who often sometimes I would say, covet certain properties.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 7>Does that change any of them?

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, obviously, I believe deeply in real estate ags. My

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 9>mom is a real estate agent, all my clients are agents.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 7>Is well calling you and say what my.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Mom supports this idea, okay, as he supports the partnership,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 9>but no agents are at the center of this. And

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 9>you know we both are companies with loan officers and

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 9>real estate agents. We are empowering the real estate professionals

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 9>that are required to make the transaction happen.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 10>The other thing I would add around the rate environment

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 10>to that question.

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>You guys did kind of smile when I said, what

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 3>was going on with the ten year and how we

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 3>some rates moved down?

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 5>So it does impact Well, it's great.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 10>To see rates moving in a good direction. We think

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 10>that gets more buyers off the sideline. But I think

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 10>what's unique.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 7>It's the economy slowing down. Andy's going to be working,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 7>that's right.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 10>What's unique about Rocket in particular is that Rocket has

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 10>the home search experience. We have a servicing book and

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 10>because of that, we can acquire clients at a lower cost.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 10>And when you can acquire clients that are lower cost,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 10>you can help save them money on the overall transaction,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 10>and so you eliminate a lot of the friction. You

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 10>become more efficient by using technology, and that turns into

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 10>real savings in terms of lower rates and lower fees,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 10>and that happens in any rate environment. That's what's unique

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 10>about business.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Some of the mortgage origination costs, some of these things

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>will go away or be reduced.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 10>Or what that's right, and that's because that's because many

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 10>of the clients are buying they're already homeowners that we service,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 10>and then they're buying their next home, and so the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 10>cost to acquire that client becomes significantly lower. And because

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 10>we do a good job servicing them, we can then

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 10>provide them with their next purchase, a cash out refinance

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 10>home equity loan, can do all of that more efficiently

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 10>because that cost of acquisition has come down significantly.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have a couple of minutes left and we

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>want to talk a little bit about the macro environment

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and the individual companies as Carol mentioned both of you

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 2>guys reported earnings late yesterday. Compass shares down about one

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>point five percent. The company forecasts first quarter revenue that

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>topped analyst estimates. When you look out at the landscape

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>right now, where are you seeing signals of strength and

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 2>where you see signals of weakness?

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 9>Robert, So, overall, we have more inventory, which has been

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 9>the key bottleneck over the last five years, which has

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 9>not been enough inventory. So we have nine per cent

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 9>more inventory than we did this time last year, but

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 9>still less than pre pandemic levels. Prices are basically flat

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 9>to up one percent. We have four percent more pending

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 9>contracts than we did this time last year, so things

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 9>are okay. We're not out of the woods yet. Mortgage

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 9>rates being at three year lows at just under six percent,

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 9>I think the key is, can we see sub six

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 9>percent mortgage rates not for a day, not for three days,

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 9>but for a season. If we do, then I think

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 9>we will start will be out. We will see strength

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 9>in the market for Roon.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Same question to you, what do you see when it

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>comes to the macro, how does it compare from last year,

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>a year ago, six months ago, and your visibility on

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the outlook.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 10>I mean generally, when you look at all the different

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 10>industry forecasts, we expect the mortgage market to be bigger

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty six than twenty twenty five. I think

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 10>the question is just how much bigger and how far

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 10>up into the right.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 5>So a lot so more activity, more.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Activity, more purchase behavior, more refinance behavior. Obviously, as Roberts said,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 10>we see inventory starting to creep up a little bit,

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 10>which is good. We're starting to see rates cooperate, which

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 10>is good. And I think that for the first time

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 10>you're starting to see a five handle on the raid

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 10>environment and that's going to bring a lot of buyers

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 10>off the sideline. And so we do expect twenty six

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 10>to be better than twenty five. But a big part

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 10>of this is just some companies have built a business

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 10>model to be able to thrive in any rate environment,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 10>and that's kind of what our focus is.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>We know the President is so focused on affordability. He's

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>focused on making sure that people can get into homes.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Have either of you guys had conversations with the administration.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 8>We have.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we have great relationships with everyone at the

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 10>administrative world, and we support reform. We support affordability. We

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 10>support new programs, new initiatives. Anything we can do to

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 10>create more buyers and sellers and improve the supply challenge

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 10>that we have in this country we support.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 3>Was there anything in terms of a specific program that

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>you would like or policy that you'd like to see

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the administration support?

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 11>I would. I'd very much like to see them.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 9>Eliminate the National Association Real It is clear cooperation rule

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 9>that forces homeowners to put their listings in mls. It's

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 9>not NAR's home, it's the homeowner's home, and they should

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 9>have the freedom to market their home when, where and

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 9>how they want.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Great stuff.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Please come back, let us know how this partnership's going

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 3>and the impact that you guys are seeing.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 7>Really appreciate it.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Robert Refkin, Founder, chairman and CEO Compass International Holdings and

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Varun Krishna, President and CEO Rocket Companies.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 7>Joining us right here in studio. Gentlemen, Thank you again.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Busines This Week Daily

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>coming up after this.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five yeas during

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Shares of due A Lingo are tanking today. The stock

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 3>in fact right now down about seventeen percent.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 7>It did though, hit.

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Its lowest intra day since February of twenty twenty three,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 3>now down more than eighty percent since May of twenty

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, and about twenty two percent of the float

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 3>is short, so there's some real negative sentiment on the name.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Shares sliding after the companies said it's drive to gain

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>subscribers would mean slower earnings growth and narrower profit margins

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 3>in the short term. Tim, you keep reminding us that

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot going on with the company, some transformations here.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>The company said it would step up investment in AI

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and sacrifice some degree of monetization in order to accelerate

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>user growth and engagement. The goal double the current number

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>of daily active users to one hundred million in twenty

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight. Great to be talking again with a member

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of the Duelingo c suite. Back with Luis von Ahn,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 2>co founder, chairman, president and CEO of Duelingo. He joins

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 2>us from New York. Louis always good to see you.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about the quarter and the outlook

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, but I want to start big picture

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 2>with AI because I mean, you've been thinking and researching

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>AI for decades. At this point, you're a recipient of

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a MacArthur Genius Foundation grant back in the year two

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six. We're working on AI. This is nothing,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 2>nothing new to you, what's happening right now. But answer

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the question for investors, is AI a threat to your business?

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, thank you for having me.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think that we're in a unique point

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 12>in time where because of AI.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 6>We're going to be able to teach significantly better.

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 12>And you know, Dueling was is by a wide margin,

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 12>the largest app in education in the world, and I

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 12>think because of that, we're going to be able to

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 12>really take advantage of this, you know, AI boon to

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 12>be able to teach significantly better. And our sense is

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 12>that within the next few years, we're going to have

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 12>an app that teaches us well as a one on

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 12>one tutor, but also is as fun as a mobile game.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 12>And if we're really able to do that, I think

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 12>there's just so much more that we canencapture. So that's

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 12>what that's what we're doing, we're really shooting for that.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 3>So jumping on the AI bandwagon, I mean, I guess

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 3>what I guess what investors want to know is what

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 3>is dual Lingo's advantage over potential new AI learning apps.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, uh, you know, at the moment, we're not we're

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 12>not particularly concerned with competition in terms of you know,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 12>other other education apps.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 8>We have.

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 6>For example, for.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 12>Language learning, we have about eighty five percent of the

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 12>market share of all daily active vities of people who

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 12>are learning a language.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 6>So we have huge scale.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 12>And what differentiates us is that, because of that scale,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 12>we just have more data into how people learn than

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 12>anybody else and we can use that to train our

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 12>own specific models. So we just have the advantage of scale,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 12>of being able to watch literally billions of exercises every

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 12>day by people who are learning different things.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>But as you know, this is going and this is

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 3>moving pretty quickly the AI impact it seems, and to

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 3>be fair, you are right, like we'll see may say

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, we're kind of early in on

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 3>this process and the impact. But what does dual lingo

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 3>offer that can't easily be replicated by a large language model,

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 3>And how do you kind of view that competitive landscape evolving.

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean there's a there's a there's a number

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 6>of things.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 12>I mean, for one, with doual lingual, what we do

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 12>is we try to build a habit of learning. I mean,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 12>for example, fifteen million of our daily active users have

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 12>a streak of longer than three hundred and sixty five days,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 12>meaning they have been using dualingo for a year or

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 12>longer and haven't missed the day. So we're really trying

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 12>to build a habit for that. And this is why

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 12>do a linguist part game, part education, And that's you know,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 12>I think that's just the right thing. It just turns

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 12>out the hardest thing about learning something by yourself is

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 12>staying motivated. The actually the content to learn has been

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 12>there for a long time. So for example, it's you know,

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 12>you've been able to learn a language by just reading

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 12>a book for hundreds of years.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 6>That has been there.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 12>It's just what we do differently is we motivate people

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 12>to continue doing it.

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 6>And that's hard to get right.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So what are what our investor is not getting right?

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>In your view, Carol? Carol mentioned some of the stock

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>moves and now you know, down at a point that

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you haven't seen since February of twenty twenty three. What

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>are investors missing here?

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a matter of timing.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 12>You know, on our end, we are trying to build

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 12>a company for the very long term. We're trying to

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 12>do something that you know, for example, in our in

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 12>our shareholder letter, we said that we were shooting to

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 12>have a double the daily active uses.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 6>That we have now.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 12>I mean, at the moment we have a little north

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 12>of fifty million daily active users worldwide.

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 6>We're trying to have more than one hundred million.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 12>But we're saying that that's going to take some time,

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 12>and so we'rekins concentrated in the long term.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 6>And you know what we're doing is we're trading off.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 12>This year's you know, financial metrics for a much larger

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 12>thing in.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 6>The long term.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, go ahead, Well I get that right. You know,

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>companies have to invest in order to provide growth going forward.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's fair to say that we understand

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>why investors, I mean, they're not loving your forecast for

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 3>first quarter adjusted EBITA that's missing the mark from what

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the street was expecting twenty twenty six revenue. Also that

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>forecast missing same story for twenty twenty six adjusted EBITA overall.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 3>So you talk about building this to double your daily

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 3>active users to one hundred million, how much will how

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>long will that build actually take and what kind of

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>visibility do you have on that to kind of maybe

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 3>reassure investors at this isn't something that takes longer while

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the AI world continues to challenge established players.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, we're the way we're seeing it is

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 12>We're going to spend this year really working on three things,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 12>really teaching better, improving the free user experience, and also

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 12>expanding to other subjects. I mean, by now we are

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 12>we already teach math, music, and chess, and you know,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 12>we've been growing quite a bit. About fifteen percent of

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 12>our active users are learning things that are you know,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 12>other than languages. Our chess courtse has grown quite significantly.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 12>So these are the three things that we're working on,

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 12>and we're going to be working on that for the

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 12>rest of the year, and we're expecting that towards the

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 12>end of the year we're going to see some improvements

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 12>in our year over year growth rate. We're still growing,

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we've had five years of really phenomenal growth.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 12>We iPod in twenty twenty one, and since then we've

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 12>more than five x our active users, so you know,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 12>we expect that will continue growing pretty strongly.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Luis, is the idea in making changes to the free

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>tier is it to get more people who don't use

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>dulingo now to use the free tier, or is to

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>get those free free tier users to upgrade to a

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 2>paid tier.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 12>Historically, what we have done is we have try to

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, the way we generate value on duolingo is

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 12>there's two parts of it. One is how many active

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 12>uses we have. That's kind of like the size of

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 12>the pie that has grown quite significantly. And then there's

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 12>how many of these people are paying us because we

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 12>have this freemium model, that's you know, like the fraction

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 12>of the pie that our payers.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Historically we have worked on both.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 12>We have worked on growing the pie and also growing

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 12>the fraction of the pie that is paying, which is

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 12>why our bookings have grown really significantly over the last

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 12>five years. This year, we're mainly concentrating on just growing

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 12>the pie, that is the number of people that are

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 12>actively using dual Lingo. Because it is our belief that

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 12>because of the moment that we're in. We really want

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 12>to have as many people as possible actually learning something

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 12>meaningful and dual Lingo and once we're able to do that,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 12>I mean, one of the main advantages that we have,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 12>certainly against new entrance is scale. They're just there's there's

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 12>no other education app that has the scale that we have.

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, great to always get a check on what you

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 3>guys are up to and really appreciate it. Love to

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>hear more too as we go out throughout the year,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>how things are going.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm the three fifty five, I think my lingo I'm

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 2>almost at a year.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I think I think Sebastian actually said he's on his

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 3>streak is about seven hundred and seventy. That's one of

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 3>our producers. Hey, Louise, thank you so much. Luis fan On,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 3>co founder, chairman, president, CEO of due Lingo. When we

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>come back and check on trading and stocks on the move.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple, Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Business app or watch live on YouTube.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, the President posting about Anthropic and federal agencies. He's

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>telling all agencies, the President that is to stop using

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic Federal agencies cease use of Anthropics technology. Anthropic made

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a mistake to strong arm the Pentagon. This is now

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>a redhead cross in the Bloomberg terminal. The President posting

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 2>on true Social about anthropic and federal agencies. The latest

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the President telling all agencies to stop use of anthropics technology.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have Katrina Manson on the program in the

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.959
<v Speaker 2>four o'clock hour. There was a four five pm Eastern

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>time deadline yesterday. Anthropics Starrio Amidae came out just after

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 2>our program ended and essentially said we are not we're

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>not wavering from our position about our technology not being

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>used for these two things, mass surveillance of Americans correct

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and fully autonomous drones drone fully autonomous weapons.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but talking a lot about in terms of mass

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>drones being used, and I understand was that the Pentagon

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 3>was going to be talking with Anthropics. So we're kind

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of counting down to the wire on that as well.

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 3>In the meantime, we want to get to our own

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Eric Wiener, talk a little bit about the trade today,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.959
<v Speaker 3>the week, the month, Ready to start a new one.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Eric Wener, Senior Editor Equities America's here at Bloomberg News

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 3>in our interactive Brokers studio never dul date. Interesting trade,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.479
<v Speaker 3>interesting trade? Where should we begin here as we are

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 3>wrapping up February.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's interesting is one word to use.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 7>I just the market stocks are down for the week overall.

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I am we start with banks? Well yeah, because yeah.

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Well yes, but I am also.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Confused about hot inflation print. But yields are down and

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to understand. That doesn't make sense to me.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Is it just that we are so worried about the

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 3>outlook here? The private credit worries, the private market worries,

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 3>leading to yes, what you said? So homage to you,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Tim in terms of.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 8>Banks, did you did you say that? Because that's actually

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.959
<v Speaker 8>what's what appears to be going on. I mean, you

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 8>can't get a straight answer directly from like the bond market,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 8>but but that does appear to be what's going on,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 8>which is I mean the keyword would be uncertainty. There's

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 8>so much up in the air. It's because it's not

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 8>just you know, private credit. It's basically the whole lending

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 8>landscape possibly being you know, under in risk at risk,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 8>and so you're looking at.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about corporate, regional, individual, everything.

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 8>Well or what. So there's risk that there's rising the

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 8>rising problems in credit cards, there is you know, rising

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 8>delinquencies across the lending spectrum. And then you have all

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 8>of this private funding which is less regulated and has

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 8>been financing a lot of the technology growth that's been

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 8>going on. So you have this big mishmash of risks

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 8>that are flowing in ways that we can't really predict

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 8>right now. What we do know though, is that the

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 8>last time there was a blow up, it got really ugly.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 8>So that's really what like the first Brands thing, you know,

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 8>all of the stuff that happened a couple of years

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 8>ago is really scaring people right now. And if you

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 8>look at who's exposed to it, it's much bigger companies

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 8>and much more important in central companies because you're talking

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 8>about open AI, you're talking about anthropic you're talking about

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 8>companies that are driving the technological growth that we need

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 8>and that we're counting on. And if they can't get

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 8>the funding that they are anticipating then that spending that

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 8>is ricocheting across the market could be pulled back. And

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 8>that's really the underlying fear of everything going on with

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 8>AI right now. So it sort of spills over into

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 8>a whole bunch of different places. And we haven't even

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 8>talked about Iran yet.

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>You have any we're going to talk about Iran, But

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got me on the underlying fears about AI, and

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that's certainly one of them, is the idea that maybe

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>we won't see the results of all this spend. Another

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>one is what happened with Block slash Square last night

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and a forty percent reduction in force, and it has

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>people thinking and we've I'm sorry to beat a dead horse. Well,

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 2>we've been doing this all day today because I think

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of yeah, I think there are

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of questions still about you know, is this

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 2>idiosyncratic to Jack Dorsey and to Square or is this

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 2>something that is actually going to happen at many different

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 2>companies with white collar jobs, because it does raise market questions.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 2>And yes, the stock reaction for Square today is up.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 2>But then when you start thinking about this, Okay, if

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 2>all these companies can do more with half the number

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 2>of employees, where do those employees go? And then what

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 2>mean for their spending power?

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 5>So crin right, well.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, in other words, and we did all. I mean, look,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 8>I made my bones on that this week. But you're

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 8>you're on the tip of the whole concern, which is

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 8>that if you look at all of the technological innovation

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 8>that has happened, you know, over the last one hundred

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 8>years or so, mostly it's involved things that may kill

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 8>a job here or there, but will ultimately increase jobs.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 2>The horseless carriage, for example.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 8>Yes, exactly, the the the automobile, which you know put

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 8>buggy whips out of business but then created a whole

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 8>transportation industry. So this specific technology is designed to make

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 8>things more efficient in a very specific way, which is

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 8>to eliminate the need for you and I to be intermediaries.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 8>And that's white collar jobs. So the concern is very real,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 8>and Dorsey kind of got after it. I mean, he's

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 8>running a successful business, they're making a lot of money,

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 8>and he can and if he can make things that

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 8>much more efficient, then great for him. However, what we're

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 8>hearing is that we are very very far away from this.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting, you know, the Pentagon attacking anthropic. Nobody would

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 8>say that right now you need automated weapons. You know,

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 8>we're just not there yet. And the idea that we

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 8>shouldn't have guardrails on this seems like very much being

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 8>out in front, and the same kind of way that

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 8>like thinking that everybody is going to be replaced tomorrow,

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 8>is being way out in front. However, the longer term

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 8>risk is, yes, that high earning job. This is coming

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 8>after high earning jobs which are really underpinning the economic growth,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.479
<v Speaker 8>not just through production but through consumption, and this could

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 8>actually go right after those people that we need to

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 8>be spending, which is scary.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Fortunately, between now and Monday, if we don't get replaced, AI,

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I can say this that you're going to

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 2>join me for a special live conversation on Monday morning.

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 2>I'll send out the details of it, but it's at

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.479
<v Speaker 2>eleven am Eastern time, and we're going to talk about

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 2>this exact thing. Carol.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 3>I do worry about this circular financing. That's confusing. And

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't want to say Ponzi scheme or

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>anything because I think that that but this idea of right,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 3>did you.

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Look at the open ai ideal today.

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, oh yeah. So what I'm saying like, so, yeah.

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 7>I want to be careful. I don't want to accuse. No,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 7>that's smart, but I.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 8>This is the risk. This is the risk. So and

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 8>I realized that, and then figure take one step back

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 8>and realize that it's coming from private credit. So like,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 8>if you look at open ai today, Okay, Amazon is

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 8>going to spend fifty billion dollars and then open ai

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 8>is going to spend one hundred billion more on AWS

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 8>and all of this is coming from well, Amazon has cash,

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 8>but well they're free. Cash flow actually is going to

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 8>be negative next year. But the idea is that they

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 8>don't really need.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 5>The private Yeah, but it's okay, it's okay.

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 8>But they don't really need the private market, but open

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 8>ai does. So if all of that gets pulled back

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 8>and they can't honor the one hundred billion dollars that

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 8>they promised, that unwindes a whole bunch of expectations, including

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 8>a Amazon's expected revenues. So like, how do you value

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 8>the stock? And that's really the question.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 3>When I go to our AI expert, Rachel Mett's brilliant

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 3>smart on this AI and We say to her, I

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>want to understand open AI is balance sheet and she's.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Like me too.

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 7>And so that to me is we talk about.

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 3>The importance of transparency and understanding value and yet we

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 3>don't quite have it, and I feel like we're going

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 3>to have to do this.

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah five seconds, Well.

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 8>That is really that's really it. That's the danger of

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 8>the private Now they're going to go public so they

0:40:59.120 --> 0:40:59.959
<v Speaker 8>will have the stock.

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 2>But this is the danger of private companies about down

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to Eric Wiener. We do it because he is the best.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So killer I'm Eric Wiener, Thank you so much, senior

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>editor here at Bloomberg News.

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.