WEBVTT - Get Ready For Pay Cuts, As Work-From-Home Endures

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, it's been a head

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>scratcher from the start. Firstly, imperative was to get workers

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to work from safe places, their homes preferably. Then it

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was clear this wouldn't be a short term phenomenon, so

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>some workers wanted to swap out those homes for other homes,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe even other states. But what do the companies do

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>those that are still paying rent for those employees at

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>work spaces. Well, Noah bu Hire is real estate reporter

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. He has the cover story of the

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>new issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine and it's called

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the Work from Home Boom is here to stay. Get

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>ready for pay cuts. No, it's a great story. Talk

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to us about the decisions that companies are having to

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>make now nine months into this pandemic, with no end

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in sight and the possibility of a very changing geographic workforce. Yeah,

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. I I think it's a

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting question and and a lot of

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>this has been evolving over the course of this year's

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Companies have have realized that UM workers, their employees can

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be quite productive at home. They're they're certainly drawbacks and

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're starting to see that. So what companies

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are are are starting to do is come up with

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>policies UM that imagine, you know, what the rules of

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the road are going to be when UM, when offices

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>can be reopened safely? You know, do you have everyone

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>come back UM every day of the week. Are they

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>doing more hybrid schedules coming in a few days a week? UM?

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent do you allow workers who want

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to UM just to move somewhere in in entirely different UM.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a small town, maybe it's closer to family,

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but somewhere that's not so close to the office. Well,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this new little phrase that's coming in and something

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>tells me that we're all going to be using it

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>very soon, called localized compensation. What is that? Well, it's

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's an idea that's been around and been

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in practice for for a long time. I mean, companies,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>even the federal government paid different wages for the same

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>work in different places. And and it's just a reality

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that the cost of labor and the cost of living

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>very um widely across the US. And as a result,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>UM companies try and pay in accordance with local labor

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>market conditions and with you know, something that would allow

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>their workers, um, if they're you know, professional to live

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a sort of what we consider a professional lifestyle and

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>fill in the blank city and um, you know, there's

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>data out there, and companies use this data. But now

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they're having to think about, well, how do we um

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>pay people who make these voluntary moves to places where

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we may not have an offer? Right, Because if some

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of what you're pay is based on is the city

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that your headquarters is in. You can imagine how companies

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>would feel a little odd if if cuddenly you went

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to a place where the cost of living was half

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the price or what have you. There's gonna be a

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of litigation about this though, right. I mean, workers

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to make the case that there is them,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>whether they're in New York City or San Francisco or

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Montana you know, I think there are a lot of

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>strong feelings about this. I don't know if there's going

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to be litigation per se. I mean, this is something

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been around for a while, and I think a

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who have made these moves, including some

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of the employees I interviewed from my story, get that

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're living in a place that's cheaper to live,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's there, um in a way to be paid less,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and that in many cases um companies are still paying you,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>uh so that you can afford a similar lifestyle or

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>even a better lifestyle in the place you've chosen to relocate.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much is a company entitled to know

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if you if you move back in to your parents,

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, and you're not paying any rent, you're not

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>paying any utilities, or you're just giving your parents. I mean,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is that something a company is entitled to take into account?

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Imagine say those parents who are in a city. Yeah. Yeah,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I don't I don't think there's any

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence that that's how these policies are being rolled out

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>in In fact, I mean that sounds like more of

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a temporary arrangement. And the company I've profiled, Red Finn

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, explicitly says that these temporary moves that are

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>happening during the pandemic, those they're not adjusting pay for

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>those people. They're They're talking about folks who are making

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a life decision to say, leave New York and moved

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to Rochester closer to where they have family, and they're

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>settling down there. It's these are these are these are

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>permanent moves. These are not um, you know, I'm trying

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep myself and my family safe during the pandemic.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to leave this town. These are These are

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people who are making long term decisions. Yeah, it's going

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to be so interesting to see what human resource departments

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>do after people are vaccinated. I mean, will they hold

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, recruitment events in all sorts of places and

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be quite happy to to take somebody on staff from

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a state that is nowhere near a headquarters or even

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an outpost. It will be interesting to see, Yeah, and

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're seeing. So yeah, yeah, it's

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. It gives the American labor force so much

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>more choice and also makes makes the possibility for it

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be more mobile, right, And that's been one of

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the problems for the American labor force. It's it's not

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>as mobile as other labor forces, and you know, going

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>across state lines and so on entails all sorts of

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other sort of tax rules and so on. So see

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>how that all plays out. But no, I do want

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask you though, um banks. For example, you know,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there are certain banks that are talking about increasing bonuses

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for some of their star staff this year. And it's

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not just the banks. So on the one hand, we're

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing them try to cut costs, maybe close headquarters, close

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>some of their office buildings and so on. But they're

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not docking pay or reducing pay for their such star stuff,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are they. No? I mean, look that that that seems

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the evidence that that our colleagues here Bloomberger

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are reporting um. But look what what my story is

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>really about or is a long term shift and how

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are thinking about this and for all those star

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>traders who maybe getting bigger bonuses. I think we're seeing

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some early indications that Wall Street firms are looking at

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what positions don't have to be in New York and

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what they can move to lower cost places, and and

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, some of some of their back office staff.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of their staff might find that they can lead

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>better lives if if they can live in you know,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>say Nashville or Dallas, than than having to live in

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York City metro area where costs are significantly higher. Right,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it takes almost as long to get into

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the city from the likes of Brooklyn. Just getting Noah,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. There is room for just a little levity

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>here as well. Noah bue Hire, real estate reporter with

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, has been doing a lot of research on

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this on the work from home boom and what it

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>really means for the workforce of the future here in

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States, So do check out his story. It

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is the cover of the new issue of Bloomberg Business

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine, available now on newsstands and at Bloomberg dot com.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And they're always great reads, great graphics, and a great

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pictorials associated with these cover stories, so this one is

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>no different. I really are due to check it out.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So that does it for this week for Bloomberg Markets

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve show. Do stay tuned. Balance of Power

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is next and we'll bring you up to date on

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>stimulus talks and what's going on in Washington. D c

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and as four markets. Right now, the SME five hundred

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is down more than half percent, so is the Dow

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Average NAZAC is down, but not by as much,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>done by a quarter of a percent or so. We

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have the VIX at twenty three, the Dollar index just

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>inching above ninety once again. And for those of your

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping track of Brexit, there's still a couple of days

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>left for a potential deal Sunday night is it's if

0:07:58.160 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it wants to get ratified by all the twenty seven

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>countries before the end of the year. Right now, the

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>British pound has come off about three tenths of a

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>percent versus the euro training at one ten. The Conference

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Board leading Index of Economic Indicators came in better than

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>forecast in November at point six. Economists, we're looking forward

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to show a point five reading. Not only that, but

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the October data was revised better as well, the overall

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>index coming in at positive point eight in October when

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the original reading was positive points seven. Let's bring in

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody who knows a lot about what's going on underneath

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the surface here, and that is Dana Peterson, chief economist

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Conference Board. Dana, what is actually leading the

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>leading index. Sure absolutely when we look at the details here,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a surprisingly a lot of very positive contribution

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from jobless claims, which added two tenths of a percentage

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>point to the overall six tenths increase UM. Also, I

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>S M. New words continue to be strong, as well

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as contributions from building permits and stock prices. So some

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of these areas are not at all surprising. Uh. Certainly,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we know that manufacturing uh uh new orders have been

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>improving with improving trade globally, and also as many businesses,

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>factories can affect social distancing. We also know that construction,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>residential construction has just been booming. It's on fire in

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the US, and so it makes absolute sense that permits

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have been um very positive contributors. And finally, when we

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>look at stock prices, indeed, the text sector healthcare stocks

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>UM also to a certain degree, financial stocks UM have

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been driving gained and so all those things are being

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the overall measure. So the leading index, you know,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rebounded quite quickly and was extraordinarily positive. At one point

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, above two, as close to three,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and now we're sort of coming back down to earth

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at what point will it start to concern you in

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the reading for the leading in next I mean,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we're already a little bit concerned by the fact that

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, with each even though each month shown a

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>positive reading, it's smaller. And so that suggests that we did,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>uh see a deceleration and growth heading into the last

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter of this year, and that potentially the first quarter

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of next year we might see a soft patch. Um.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Certainly we've also seen uh this behavior reflected you know,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>more retroactively, of course, but in the jobs data, as

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>payroll gains have been smaller and smaller and the unemployment

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>rate is falling at a more glacial paste. Um. So

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we are keeping watching this and you know, seeing whether

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>or not there's going to be a second dip in

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>our leading index and also our concurrent uh leading in

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>concurrent measures of activity. Dana, what is the conference forwards

0:10:55.280 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>current outlook for inflation next year? Yes, well, we have

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation rising a little bit, um but staying beneath you persent, uh,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and really that's going to be a reflection of you know,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>basis effects from very weak inflation this year twenty but

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>also a rotation of consumption. You know, a little less

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>spending on goods, more spending on services, um, where you

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>could see a little bit of inflation there um, But

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all on all pretty modest inflation outlook, so not too

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>much concern there. There are some economist, I suppose, trying

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to sound an alarm on that. Dana, you also did

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>a really phenomenal study into the impact of the pandemic

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on race and also the impact of the pandemic on women,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and you found something very disconcerting when it comes to

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>studying the female labor force. You're actually calling it a

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>she session. Can you explain to us some of the

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>key findings of that report. Sure. Absolutely. What we've seen

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is that, especially in the US, where we have the

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>most complete data, very early on in the pandemic, women

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>suffered much deeper job cuts than did men. I mean,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it was horrific across the board, but it was much

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>more cute for women. And a lot has a lot

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of that to do with the fact that women are

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>working in many of those sectors that have been very

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>negatively impacted by covid UM. But as we saw job

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gains pick up, um, we saw more women exiting the

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>labor market, and we believe that's a function number a

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>few things. Number one, the fact that you know, there's

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>still this childcare crisis in the US that was there

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic but has only gotten worse. Um. Many

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>times women find themselves that they are tasked with caring

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for older adults. But also many kids are in and

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>out of school physically, and so oftentimes the responsibility of

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>educating children from home falls on mothers. And so we've

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of women exiting the labor market. That's

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very apparent in the payrolls data. Um. Sorry, uh yeah,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>pyroll report, Friday Employment report that comes out where labor

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>market participation among women has been falling. Yeah. And as

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you say, even if the job exists, in some cases,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>women have to leave it because they just have responsibilities

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can fulfill at home unless they're They're right, Dana,

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>how much of this will turn out to be structural

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>unemployment for women? Will the female libor force bounce back

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as as the male labor force. Well, our

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>hope is that this will be a blip and that

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>female labor force participation as well as male labor force

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>participation will bounce back and return to pre coronavirus levels.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, certainly the longer people are out of

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the labor market, the more difficult it is for them

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to rejoin because of perceptions that you know, either their

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>skills of actro feed or they're credit going to be behind.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be very important for employers to

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>find ways to encourage flexibility in labor force, in labor

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>market activity UM in terms of allowing people to work

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>from home, potentially providing on site or near site childcare UM,

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and also reskilling their workers and training to make sure

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>workers get back on track UM such that we don't

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>have this these permanent losses in the labor market among

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>women as well as among men. Dana, we're pretty out

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of time. But what's the GDP forecast from the conference board?

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>For one, Yes, we're expecting growth at three point six

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>percent next year. Okay, three point six percent not not

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>negative girls at least, but we'll need a little bit

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>more than that. De bounced back probably from where we're from. Dana,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining. That is Dana beats In,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>chief economist with the Conference for there this as the

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>leading index comes in a little better than forecast, but

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>as Dana said, slowing all the while. This is one

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of the stories that's extremely disconcerting and also filters out slowly,

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>such that you don't really know exactly how big or

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>important to story it is for a little bit after

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the original announcements. I'm talking about the hacks, the hacks

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that have been filtering out news wise in the middle

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of this week and even more yesterday. Let's bring in

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's up to date on what it all is

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and how concerned we should be. Car Tike me Rota

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>covers security and particularly computer security, cybersecurity and the like

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Cartike bring us up to date on

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly who was attacked and how many at hacks there were. Yeah,

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we are still figuring this out. It's been almost a

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>week since. Um no, it's been ten days. And excuse me.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>The fire Eye breach was first prepared publicly, and since

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then it's just been a lot of questions and very

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>few answers. What we do know is that a handful

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of federal agencies were targeted, including Commerce, Treasury, parts of

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>d h um AND, as well as the Department of

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Energy and the Nuclear Administration. UH. These very sophisticated Russian

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>attackers have been targeting UM critical infrastructure and entities that

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are of government interest. But exactly who has been targeted

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the scope of the attack is still up in

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the air. There are, uh, you know, federal investigators, private

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>investigators at Microsoft and other incident response companies that are

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulling apart pieces of this. The scope is massive.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The company that was breached Older Winds. They provide I

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>T solutions largely for the federal government, but also they're

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they're all over the place. They work with UM, but

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions, telecommunications companies, defense contractors. They're a third party

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the security supply chain. UM that was

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>targeted and using a software update, UM malware was was

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>inflicted upon up to eighteen thousand of their clients. Now

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean the eighteen thousand victims exist. These Russian

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>attackers are very sophisticated, very meticulous and detailed in the

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>way in which they're targeting their victims. So as of

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>now we're hearing and there are potentially dozens, maybe up

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to hundreds of victims. So of those seventeen thousand, there

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>are about UM forty two two maybe over a hundred

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>victims so far, but UM, that number is going to

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>go up as time passes. UM. It's it is a

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tedious task trying to figure out if you have been targeted.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's what most companies, most agencies are doing right now. Amazing.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's suspected Russian hackers. Now we don't know what

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got, how much of it they have, But assuming

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they have something, will they be able to interpret data,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>will they be able to extract useful information? Or is

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>this just data that will be coming in, you know,

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in in megabytes to the Russians and they they'll find

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it difficult to actually do anything with this. Yeah, no,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they know what they're doing. UM. We don't have evidence

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of acciltration yet, but it's it's obviously a cause for concern. UM.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, when when any adversary has this level of

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>unmitigated long term access, which goes back at least to March,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if not further. UM, surely they will have gotten their

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hands on UM files and data that companies and governments

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the United States would have preferred they not have

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>their hands on. Now, exactly what they have and how

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it will be weaponized is uh still a question that

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we're all trying to answer. But you know, the presumption

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>is that they knew what they were looking for, they

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>likely got access to at least portions of it. And

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this is intelligence that will feed their UM operations, right. Uh.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>They're geopolitical status, you know, trying to assert Russia as

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a UM, you know, a power on par with with

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>other UM economic superpowers, even as that country's economic prowess

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of dissipates. This is a tool and a mechanism

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to to show the world that they're still on the

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. And uh, you know, depending on what

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence tells them, they could use it for um

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>uh for political purposes or otherwise cardigate in a sense,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the damage has already done. What kind of authorities do

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to try to mitigate the damage or prevent weaponization, as

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, including President Trump. Yeah, so you know, companies

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that have been exposed have been directed by the Cybersecurity

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Infrastructure Security Agency to cut off UM any portion of

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>their network that has UM the Solar Winds malware and

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and if they can uninstall it altogether. UM at this point, UM,

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so what happened is that when when the malware was

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>installed in uh in devices, these uh, these victims had

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out if they were actually then targeted UM

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with an attack, was that malware activated to spread through

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that network and infect it. And so that is what

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>investigators are doing right now, and it's a tedious task

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>because these attackers have cleaned up their footprints as best

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they can and are are. So it's a manual operation.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, they're going through thousands of lines of

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>code to see if anything's wrong. UM. The National Security

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Advisor Robert O'Brien cut short and overseas trip earlier this

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>week to come back to Washington help manage the crisis.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what the administration is doing right now is sort

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of an all hands on deck situation to figure out

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly the scope of the operator. Cartigue, it might be

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>up to you to keep us all informed. So thank

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you for all of your work so far. Cartigue. Me

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Rota on the Russian linked solar winds hack do follow

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>him all right? Well, we know that Maderna vaccine is

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one backing from FDA advisors that puts it on track

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to be the s con cleared in the US, perhaps

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>even as soon as today. For more on this and

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as well the little hiccups that we've been seeing with

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the rollout of the vaccine small though they maybe let's

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bring in Laurences our Associate Professor of Emergency Mendicine, JOHNS

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins School of Medicine. So, doctor Saur, is there anything

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that you've seen in terms of the little hiccups that

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>we that we've heard about, from discarding doses at modern

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>after a filtration issue to the idea that you know

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>fis are actually had more doses in its vials than

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>previously known. Anything that gives you cause for concern. I

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think concern might not be the right word, but I

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>think it just demonstrates that the these other elements of

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccine distribution are so critically important. Right. It's not just

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>UM getting the science behind making the vaccine and testing

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, evaluating the vaccines efpacy, but UM the supply chain,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>so ramping up dose production, making sure that the process

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to get it into the hands of vaccinators and before

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>getting vaccinated works m making sure that people believe in

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the process and and trust the process enough to get

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. All those things are showing how critically important

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>they are, and these hiccups are um par for the course.

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>In this very short ramp up of production. But I

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think it just demonstrates how careful we have to be

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>in this process to make sure that we're using every precous,

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>precious dose that crosses our hands. Do you have confidence

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the distribution system as it is now? Yeah? I

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that we're seeing that the distribution system

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is working as well as could possibly be expected given

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the short turnaround. I think some of the feedback that

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing from FISER and the administration and the possibility

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that pure dirsors will go out shows that it's far

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>from perfect, and UM, communication becomes critically important in these um,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this really intricate distribution process. UM. I think seeing things

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>like the potential for an extra dose or two in

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the FISER vials, hearing that some of the production delays,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, UM, we we're seeing that actually there's a

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of eyes on on the process and that the

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kings are being worked out really quickly, which is great.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So even though we're identifying challenges in the process, we're

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>working through them, you know, in this like whole response

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that allows us to fix it and and and improve

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>efficiency as quickly as possible. That's such a great point

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because everybody really has the same goal here on that

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there might be extra doses in the

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Fiser vials, is there anything that concerns you about that,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>because it seems to me that you know, if Fiser

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>won't you officially say there's more than five, then are

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you at risk of getting just a little bit less

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>than the dose that you need or just a little

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more than the dose that you need. It seems

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a little vague for me. Yeah, I understand that completely.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know these vials are they're doing that

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>because they want to ensure that that there's no um

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>undercutting of what they expected. Sans are right, So um,

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that that there may be an extra dose

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 1>or an extra dose and a half in these vials

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is not unreasonable given the scale that we're talking about

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and how quickly things are being partitioned and measured out

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the The I think the risk comes when you try

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to say like, oh, yes, you could get six, you

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>could get potentially six and a half or seven. UM.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you tell everyone there's five doses in this

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>file and you should get five doses, you're not. You

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have less likely that people are going to get UM

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a smaller dose right. So, um, perhaps it will be

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised with an extra dose and you can vaccinate several

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred extra people over the course of the projection. UM,

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But you don't risk under underestimating or you don't risk

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>overestimating who you can vaccinate, so you don't risk people

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>getting left out. Is there a little bit of a

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>danger though, if there is you know, a half doals

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>left and somebody decides they'll combine that with a half

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>doals from another vial, does that not sort of letting

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the risk of contamination and so on? Lauren, Yeah, I

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think we want to We don't want to see that

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so UM. I know many places have made the determination

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not to combine partial doses from multiple vials. So that

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>might mean a little bit of wasting at the at

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of that bial um, but that's really a

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>safety issue that I think it is the right decision

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to not combine partial doses. It gets into measurement challenges,

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets into contamination challenges, and it gets into like

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>basic accounting challenges. So when you're thinking about who you

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and how you track them, UM, you want to

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be sure that you're not taking those those steps where

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>error can enter because You'll also have to follow up

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>all of these people with additional vaccinations for their booster shops,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you want to make sure that you have

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate number of booster shops for the people that

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you've vaccinated initially as well. I mean, there's so many

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>things that have to go right here, and having seen

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>how the PPE distribution system worked, it doesn't inspire that

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>much confidence. But I guess, I mean, is there any

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>room for let's say criminality here? I mean, can can

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people managed to get away with the types of things

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that were getting away with when it came to PPE,

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>selling selling stuff online illegally and so on. I think that, um,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a slightly different environment. UM. I do I share

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the concern that there are potential for UM for bad actors.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we always see that in emergencies because there's um,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the regulations become relaxed, or when UM

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of misinformation and disinformation spreading.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>UM that's where these people and these activities flourish. I

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of eyes on this process, and

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so few places where you can actually get UM

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>legitimate vaccine supply that it's much less likely that you

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>will see this happen because somewhat a new company could

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>pop up and say we're making an N and five.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>It's totally approved. You're good. You're not going to have

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a new company pop up and say we've reproduced the

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Visor vaccine. You're totally good. It's trying to take it

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so to about the number of eyes on all of

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this process. Lawrence, thank you so so much, as always

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as Lawrence Sauer, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine at Johns

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins University. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio