WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Trump Is Exhibiting 25th Amendment Behavior + Why Anti-Corruption Could Be A Powerful Electoral Issue

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sponsorship time. But you know what, it's really great

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when you get a sponsor that you already use.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And guess what.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Quint's is something that in the Todd household we already

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>go to. Why do we go to Quint's Because it's

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a place you go where you can get some really

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>nice clothes without the really expensive prices. And one of

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the things I've been going through is I've transitioned from

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>being mister cot and ty guy to wanting a little

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more casual but to look nice doing it. Is I've

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>become mister quarter zip guy.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Well guess what.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Guess he's got amazing amounts of quarter zips. It is Quints.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I have gotten quite a few already from there. The

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff's really nice. They have Mongolian cashmere sweaters for fifty dollars.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I just know, hey, cashmere, that's pretty good. You don't

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>normally get that for fifty bucks or less. Italian wool

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>coats that look and feel like designer the stuff. I'll

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, right, you look at it online, you think, okay,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is this really as nice as it looks? Well, when

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I was like, oh, this is real quality.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm going to end up making sure I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take it to my dry cleaner so I don't screw

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it up when I clean it. But I've been quite impressed.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In Hey, it's holiday season. It is impossible to shop

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for us middle aged men. I know this well. Tell

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>your kids, tell your spouses, tell your partners. Try Quints.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're trying to figure out what to get

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>your adult child, what to get your mom or dad,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you you're gonna find something that is going

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable for them on Quints. So get your

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wardrobe sorted and your gift list handled with quints. Don't wait,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>go to quins dot com slash chuck for free shipping

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>on your order and three hundred and sixty five day

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>returns now available in Canada as well. That's qui nce

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and three hundred and

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Use that code.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Wednesday, and welcome to another episode of

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. So got another loaded show today. The

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>guest is a gentleman named Jeff Clements. He's part of

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an organization called American Promise. They are an organization that

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is campaigning a state by state to get I think

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they're up to twenty three state legislatures right now to

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>approve a constitutional amendment that would allow for regulation of

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the financing of campaigns. Essentially thanks to Citizens United and

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the belief in our judiciary system that money

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is speech that without a constitutional amendment, there really is

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>no law that will successfully sort of get through the

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>courts and pass muster in order to limit the influence

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of money. I think the debate about the First Amendment

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>is I think we are having a debate about amplification

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of your right to free speech. I think we all

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>agree everybody's a right to free speech.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>The question is.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Who's got the right to amplify who should have access

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>to amplification? How does that work? If you will, And

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty simple. Well, we go through it quite a bit.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>As you know. I've one of if I have a

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>pattern of guests that I will that I will default to.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It is those that are looking to improve the infrastructure

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the democracy. I've had a conversation about open primaries

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and how do we get rid of partisan primaries. In

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this case, I think there is agreement that we've gotten

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, we don't know how to do

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>anything anymore in moderation, right, we take a little thing

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and we go to an extreme, right. I mean we

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>do this in society all the time. We should pay

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>players in college sports, yes, but the system we created

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>creates all sorts of essentially absurdities in the market. Should

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sports betting be open to all fifty states instead of

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the state of Nevada? I think we thought, okay, that's fair.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>How we've allowed this system to populate and sort of

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 1>consume the lives of some people is kind of out

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of control, right, every we go from we have a

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>system that seems to only know how to regulate when

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we let things go to excess, right, We don't seem

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to know how to do it that way. So in

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this case, I think we all know now money and

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>politics has gotten crazy. Just to give you a sense

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. In twenty twelve, I had this idea at

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>NBC to audit the two presidential campaigns after the fact,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Romney. And my thesis was, this was the

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>first time that both campaigns each spent a billion dollars.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the first billion dollar campaign. Obama had a billion,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Romney had kind of just under a billion, but if

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you throw in all the outside money, it was Basically

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time we had a billion. To

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>put that in perspective. In two thousand, both Al Gore

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and George W. Bush were within state, within the system,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>which meant it was publicly funded general election campaigns. Bush

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>did not take public funding during his primary campaign, but

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he did during his general election campaign. Basically, it limited

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides to sixty five million dollars, so we more

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>than ten x from the general election in twenty to

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve.

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Well where are we today?

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty five, North Carolina is likely to be

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the first billion dollar Senate race. So in twenty twelve

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we had a billion. We had one campaign spending a

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, so it combined two billion dollars. And now

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have one singular US Senate race. They might

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not even decide the balance of power in the United

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>States Senate. Okay, cost a billion dollars. So we have

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten to absurd degrees of money. And I think everybody's

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fine with small donors populating these things. You're not going

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to see many people say that that's a bad idea.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the large donations. It's the anonymity of the large donations, etc.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It is the idea that an outside group can essentially

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>spend more than the two actual campaigns combined, and they

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can decide what the agenda is, not the actual voter

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>powered campaign. So, you know, we have created a system

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely in need of some sort of regulation.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Congress is actually tried, but the courts have said they're

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all unconstitutional. So if that's the case, then there really

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is only one answer on the on campaign finance, and

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it is that is that's why if you believe in

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>term limits, well those have all been struck down as unconstitutional.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It was a big movement in the nineties. A bunch

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of states past term limits for members of Congress. None

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of them pass constitutional muster because once you put in

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>age required, you know, it's sort of that was the

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>only there was. The only requirement was age in the constitution,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and so they were not considered constitutional. If you want

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>term limits in, you're going to have to put a

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>constitutional amendment in. We have one constitutional amendment that has

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with term limits. It's term limits for the presidency.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So there are certain things where the judiciary decided to

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>overrule the legislative branch. And when it turns when it

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to campaign finance laws, the judiciary has written the legislation.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>They are legislating from the bench. There is nobody that

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>passed a law wanting super PACs. There is nobody that

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>passed the law that wanted unlimited money in politics. Those

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>laws did not pass, they were interpreted after legal rulings.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the case to put in to

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>put this in and it's interesting and you'll hear I

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is you know, this gets you know,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to the you know where each party on this.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's an argument for both conservatives and progressives that

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to you want to you want a fair fight,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and the way we finance our campaigns makes it where

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no such thing as a as a fair fight.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's the conversation. I kind of think we're we're, uh,

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we're on the cusp, as I've said before, where we're

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get more and more interest in doing this

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>with our constitution. Can we get thirty eight states interested?

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you get Congress to pass a law anyway? We

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>go through all the mechanics of this as well as

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the larger idea with Jeff. I think it's for those

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of you concerned about that issue, I think you will

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>enjoy that conversation. I'm also going to have my top

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>five list, and for those of you looking for a

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>holiday guide. In some ways, my Top five list will

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>serve a bit as a holiday guide buying guide for

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the for the person who wants to feel extraordinarily well

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>informed about the zeitgeist of the world and of America.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope my Top five list will do that for you.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But before we begin, I want to pick up on

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>something that I did it, you know, which is, you know,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we're in one of those moments where we're trying to

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out does this latest outrage mean anything, And of

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>course the outrage being you know, Donald Trump's just horrendous

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>comments about Rob Reiner and his wife and the death

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and the murder of Rob Reiner and his wife. And

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some ways it's not a new debate,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>right Donald Trump has put us in this position before.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has embarrassed us collectively as a country, collectively,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as a society, collectively as a human species. Right he

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just this is what he does. And I know that

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been at these moments before or where he says

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>something so outrageous, Well this, you know, nobody can survive this, well,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody other than Donald Trump.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He seems to be teflon don on just about everything,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but the reaction on this one he has been fascinating

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because it seemed as if it was a bridge too

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>far for a lot of people. And what he did,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>especially so soon after the Charlie Kirk assassination, so soon after,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>so many on the right targeted anybody who said anything

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>remotely negative about Charlie Kirk, you know, in some cases,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>got him doxed, got him fired, cost them jobs, And

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, we have behavior modeled by

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States that if anybody else

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>behaved this way in the workplace, they'd be fired. Of course,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he's done this multiple times, right, this is not the

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>first time he's done something that if any of us

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>did it, it would cost us our marriage, it would

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>cost us relationships, it would cost us our jobs, it

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would cost us our cost us our you know, whatever,

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>our whatever place we feel like we are in society,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we might be shunned, we might be ostracized,

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, in some of the behavior you know that

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is that is it's sometimes the only the only thing

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we have. You'd be shamed, right, We know that the

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>real superpower of Donald Trump is shamelessness. It's fascinating to

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see on the heels of this story because I'll tell

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you what, really what I couldn't shake with the with

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Reiner story with Trump. As appalling as the first

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>tweet was, it was the second it was the second

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>time he dealt with it when he when he sort

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of reinforced the tweet on camera. Because I actually think

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that this space signal a larger, more alarming issue that

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>if we take seriously people's concerns about Joe Biden and

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>his loan term, then we need to start taking seriously

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>about whether he's all there and how quickly you know

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to it's going to sound like I'm trolling him,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, at what point is his behavior twenty

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>fifth Amendment alarming type of behavior? Because think about it

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this way, there's probably two things that may have happened

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in between Donald Trump tweeting what he did on social

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on his truth social platform and reiterating what he said

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on camera about Rob Reiner. One would two things happened

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or didn't happen, right, Either somebody said to him, perhaps

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it was the chief of staff, Suzie Wiles. We're going

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to her in a minute, but perhaps it

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was said, hey, you know at the Reiner stuffs, they'd

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>be careful that didn't you know, I don't know what

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you intended to say.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>It didn't play well.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you you know, express just straight up condolences

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and sort of, you know, move on, or nobody said anything.

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Either.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Either potential outcome is alarming to me. Why is it

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>alarming because either he was told don't do it again,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and he did it anyway, and he is that sort

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of stubborn that caught up in his own filter bubble,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that delusional, right, or nobody has the guts to tell him, hey,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>this is not good. Don't do it, don't talk about it.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't say it.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That's so either way, you have to ask yourself, oh

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>my god, what's going on here? And for me, it

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a different Donald Trump, you know, I know. So

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Biden, when you know, as folks started making

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the case asking questions about whether Biden was the same Biden,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you would show Biden clips doing interviews in twenty fifteen,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, even twenty sixteen, and you would see, my god,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not even the same Joe Biden as twenty nineteen.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That's it was my impression. I spent a lot of

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>time at Joe Biden in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic, and I thought he had definitely slowed down.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It was the same Joe Biden, but an older version,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and he definitely seemed to lack the same energy he

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>once had. He wasn't the glad hander. He was certainly

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a talker, but he wasn't as fast as a.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Talker, you know.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>There was definitely And then the difference between Joe Biden

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>circa twenty nineteen and circa twenty twenty three was even

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>more so. But the real contrast was between the Joe

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden that I covered in the Obama era and the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden that I was covering for the one term

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of his presidency.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>It was a big difference.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So in some way the questions were natural, Hey, he's

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely getting older, you know, the younger Joe Biden would

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>be traveling the country. Why isn't older Joe Biden traveling?

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was you know, they never wanted to say

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it was because he can't, or because he gets tired,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or because they don't you know, it was always some

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>other excuse and things like that. It was definitely some

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>form of a you know, you can call it a

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>cover up, but it was definitely, you know, it was

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely some form of rationalization for why there is they were.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>They were certainly concerned and sensitive to the age issue,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to the idea that he wasn't and they were

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of always trying to push back on this idea

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't up to the child, up to the job,

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or as energetic as he once was. With Donald Trump,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's admittedly a little bit harder, right because you know,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has had erratic behavior for years. Right, this

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is not new his erratic behavior. And so as the

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>title of my substack goes, how will we know? Right,

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we had a clear idea that something had changed about

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden because his speech text had changed. His energy

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>levels were clearly different. He was you know, more spry,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he was walking, he was younger, you know, all those things.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>There were physical changes that you couldn't ignore and the

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>public side, right some eight you know, that's why the

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers were consistently in the seventies and eighties, you know,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why I've just sort of, you know, the

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>false narrative that somehow the media was covering this up?

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>What is there to cover up? Media was the one

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>asking pole questions. Do I think there were some within

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the White House Press score that could have been more aggressive? Absolutely?

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of think, you know, we you know,

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the media didn't show the footage. It's

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not like the media didn't let you know he was

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>taking the short staircase. It's not like the med you know,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>media didn't show you him shuffling around and tripping over sandbags, things.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Like that with trumpets. Admittedly a little harder.

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know, when you see him behave erratically, you know,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but this was a moment with the Reiner thing where

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.239
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, you know, Donald Trump is no more

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>or less narcissistic today than he was ten years ago.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>But ten years ago he was still sensitive to what

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the public thought of him, and he didn't quite live

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in his own bubble is filtered bubble that is more

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so today than he's ever had before. He's got surrounded

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>by yes people and sycophans, who don't want I don't

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think want to present him with the with reality if

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reality the only show him reality when reality looks good

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for him. They don't show him reality when it paints

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>an ugly picture for him. And so he definitely seems

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>more detached from reality today than he did when he

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>first entered the political arena. But you know, the Donald

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump of ten years ago, when a celebrity died, his

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>narcissism would put him, would sort of link him up.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He would say, you know I was in his movies,

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or you know I was able. You know, he's most

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and in this case with Michelle Reiner who took the photo,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>who was the photographer for the Art of the Deal

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>photo that Donald Trump posed for back in the eighties,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the old Donald Trump, the guy who was

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just as shameless, but in that sort of

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I've got something to sell you shamelessness would have said, boy,

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>her career would have been nothing without me, Her career

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have happened without me. They in some ways that

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>would have been the normal. Oh boy, there he goes, putting,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>making everything about himself, which he always does, but sort

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of within his own weird semi positively, it would at

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>least try to say, hey, they were successful, but he

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>would try to take credit for their success. This time,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he's in this really ugly place right where he just assumes,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, because by the way, imagine like, you know,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he because there's another alternative here that he said that

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because he feared one of his supporters did this, which

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in itself is such a warped version of thinking. Right,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine that he actually said it because that's

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what he thought was going to be the case, That

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in itself is troubling behavior. But you know, he's an

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty year old man, and any of us with older

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>relatives have experienced the older relative with no filter or

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>with less filter who doesn't feel like they have to

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>round the edges of commentary anymore, that they can just well,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, man, Grandpa's got to be grandpa, grandma's

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>got to be grandma, uncle's got to be uncle. Ann's

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going to etcetera, etcetera. But he's president of the United States,

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know when he blurts one of these

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bizarre things that he says in front of a world

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>leader that actually changes the nature of our relationship with

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>said country. These are things that should concern us and

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>if you were is you know, do we have and

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>given what we just learned with the Vanity Fair story

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's funny with the Vanity Fair story,

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it sort of confirms everything that I'd been hearing about

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the role Susie Wilds plays that she is try She

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of the reality you know, she's the

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>reality check. But she's got a light touch, right, She's

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a she sees things the way most normal

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>people see things. But she's gonna let the process play

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>out and just clean up the worst messes, you know,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just try to try to steer a choppy shift a

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>ship through choppy waters. And you know, they've sort of

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>given up on the small stuff, and I think they

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would put mean tweets under the category of small stuff.

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother, single mother, now widow, myself

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>pay for college? And lo and behold, my dad had

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well,

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process,

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>require you just answer a few health questions online. You

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>quote at ethos dot com slash chuck so again, that's

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary, and

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is something you should really think about it,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>especially if you've got a growing family. To me, it's

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>an alarming moment where you have to start the question

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is he all there all the time? Is he so

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>consumed with himself? The fact that he can't concentrate all

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the time? I bet the fact that in the Wall

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal interview, he's doing an interview and then he

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>takes a call, and then the Interior Secretary, Doug Bergram,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk with him about remodeling the DC golf courses,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're what what And you're in the middle of

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>doing this interview. I mean, I appreciate that the journal

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>people told us about that. I mean, I think it's

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a terrible look politically that he cares more about redesigning Washington,

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>DC's three public golf courses than he does about lowering

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the price of electricity or lowering the price of groceries, right,

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like you could those TV ads right themselves. But that's

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>also another sign of of sort of you know, where

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't keep concentration, you can't keep focus that you're

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of that you're erratic. Now again, he's kind of

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>been this way all the time, So it is going

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to be harder. While it was easier us for us

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to see sort of the the you know, we could

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>just see boy Biden used to be this, Now he's this.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>That evolution of Trump is harder to fully appreciate because

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of always been kind of outrageous, He'll always say,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was sort of it felt like it was

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>planned outrage in twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen. This

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>feels a lot more sort of unfiltered, unpasteurized, if you will,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on this front. But my point is is that for

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all of those folks on the right that we're concerned

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not the staff was running things, whether

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about Joe Biden's faculties were all there, I would

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>argue the behavior we've seen of this president, particularly over

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the last few months, given his age, given how quickly

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this stuff happens. I mean, look, we are not getting

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a straight story about his current health. You don't go

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>through as many he's had I think three annual physicals

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. You get my point, right, That's what they

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>keep calling him, he keeps going back. They keep calling

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a routine you know, you know, it's not routine going

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the doctor more than once a year. I mean,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>something out of the ordinary that they're concerned about the

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that, you know, he seemed to tell us that

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the last time he took a one of these cognitive tests,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there was an audience. That's interesting. Why was there an audience?

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Why were there so many people observing this? What was

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the concern? Were there more experts that were brought in?

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It is, there is something different, and there is more

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>You can feel the sort of concern about I don't know,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not going you know, there's fear of

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>ever contradicting him. There's fear of pushing back at him.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>There's fear of telling him news he doesn't want to hear.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>These were all concerned that people had on the right,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in particular with Joe Biden in twenty twenty three and

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. So again, if you're looking to to

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>find out who's high on the hypocrisy scale of concern,

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, watch the people that express the most concern

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Biden's faculties. See pretty much everybody in primetime

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on Fox News and ask them if this behavior were

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at all being you know, if this were Biden a

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>second term of Biden behaving this way, I wonder what

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the coverage would be on primetime of Fox right. But

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in all, you know, snark aside, this unfiltered behavior is

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>alarming for either one of two things. One, he was

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>told this is not good and he still can't help himself,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>which means he's got a self control issue. He's got

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a staff so afraid of telling him bad news that

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they won't do it, and therefore he was why he

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ended up doubling down on this in the first place.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the answer is, neither is good for the country.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Neither is good, by the way, for the Republican Party.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'll ask you know, if JD. Van's and Marco

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Rubio right, they're going to have to they want to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>succeed this presidency, one of them does. Look at how

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>unhappy the voters are with the Democratic Party, even though

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they're voting for Democrats right now. Right, we saw this

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, majority had an unfavorable view of the party. Well,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what's driven that? What what's driven that? Was this idea

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that they all had their head in the sand when

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it came to Biden in twenty twenty four. And there's

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resentment among Democrats for how Democratic leaders

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>look the other way when there was an obvious, slow

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>motion train wreck taking place with the vot voters were

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>concerned about long before there was a debate between Trump

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and Biden on June twenty seventh, twenty twenty four. The

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>voters have been pretty angry about it. You know, I

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think if you want to know why there's such limited

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>trust in Chuck Schumer by fellow Democrats and Akeem Jeffries,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the entire Democratic leaders in Washington are just seen

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>as somehow they were in kahoots and they had their

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>head in the sand when it came to the Biden thing. Well,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>these same voters are going to have the same reaction

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>if it appears that Trump progressively gets worse, his behavior

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>gets more erratic, you have sort of more you know,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>enablers not wanting to either say something, and you know

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're finding out today. Look the few sober quotes that

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Susie Wiles did give a reporter and this case a

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>biographer and Chris Whipple. She didn't like what it looked

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like once they went public, and there's a fear that

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the president can't handle any sort of criticism or analytical criticism,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>or even just sort of acknowledging when there are tough

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>moments or when there are awkward things that happen in

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the administration, which only serves to concern me that when

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you really need somebody to step in, are they going

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be willing to do it? Are they going to

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be willing to say, hey, man, the emperor has no

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>clothes here. We have got to acknowledge this. We cannot

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to pretend this isn't happening. I think it's a

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>legitimate concern, and I think in some ways the president's

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>own behavior, the odd things he has said about his

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>own health, and then the erratic nature of what he

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>did with Reiner and some other folks. I think this

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is a storyline that's only going to grow. And you know,

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not getting younger, This is not going to get better.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>This is only going to become more obvious. Look, we

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see him travel the country, and I think there's

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a reason for it. Right, just like with Joe Biden,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you got to ask yourself, boy, Normally in a president

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in this situation would be traveling the country to try

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to sell his agenda and he's not doing it.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Why is that right?

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That is what began the conversation for folks who were

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned about whether Biden was up to the job. Certainly

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>not up for a second term. He couldn't do the

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>job to self to sell his agenda in the first term. Well,

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we've entered that same situation. And again, if

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you were truly concerned about Biden because of his physical

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>ailments and not due to your own politics, then you

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>should be equally alarmed by the currents situation with our

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>current president and the situation that he's in. Now. All right,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>before I go to my interview, I want to share

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>with you a poll that came to me via the

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>search Light Institute. Now, if you recall that may seem

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>familiar to some of you listeners out there, I had

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>interviewed the founder of search Light Institute, which is search

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Light is the hometown search Light, Nevada is the hometown

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of Harry Reid. Adam Gentilssen, of former Harry Reid staffer,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>started this up and it's basically an attempt to try

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to move the Democratic Party in a more pragmatic direction.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even say ideologically moderate, just more of a

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mainstream sort of try to make the party more big

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>ten again between progressive in the center a little bit

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and so. But they did a poll on corruption, and

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>why I find it interesting, it's sort of it was

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the question is what is corrupt? What do

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the voters think is corrupt versus sort of what the

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>definition perhaps we in the media have, you know, you know,

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>when I say think of the word corrupt, I think

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of like, who's ripping off taxpayers? Right? But what's interesting

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is what the voters themselves view as corrupt. And they

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>asked a terrific question, and the question was this, if

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you describe a politician as corrupt, what are you saying

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>about them? And then they offer, please select one that

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>comes closest to your view, and the number one answer

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was not somebody that was stealing taxpayer dollars. It was

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>using public office for personal financial gain.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That could mean insider trading on stocks. That could mean

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>finding out that you're buying a piece of property that's

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about to be zone for a government funded highway or

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>something like this, that somehow your net worth grows that

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>your own relatives get to start a lobbying business and

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>use your last name to get on a board, say

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with a company in Ukraine, or they use your last

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>name to start a meme coin and you make money

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>off of the crypto market. Jeez, I don't know what

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>two families might might have qualified for that, but that

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>was the number one definition of corrupt. The number two

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>most popular definition of corrupt politician was this they change

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rules to hold onto power instead of improving lives. Well,

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>basically that's re redistricting. They simply want to pick voters,

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>pick voters that they don't have to persuade. They pick

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.479
<v Speaker 1>more voters that are already on their side, so they

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do the hard work of representative democracy.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That was the second most popular. The third most popular

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>definition was they only serve wealthy donors instead of regular people. Well,

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I just told you about we're going to have our

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>first billion dollar center rights. Do you think that ten

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars donor to a Senate race as much as one

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar or even the one the ten million

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.959
<v Speaker 1>dollar donor I've had. I've had donor sources of mine

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>who only give six figure donations okay, which for just

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>about all of us, writing a check for one hundred

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars or more is a lot of money. Okay,

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's purchasing a home type of money that

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you write that to send your kid to college type

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of money. And they're considered they're not considered big donors anymore.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just considered middle class donors.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lawmaker will spend a lot more time

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>persuading that finding a ten one ten million dollar donor

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>then they will looking for one thousand, one hundred thousand

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>dollar donors because that's you know, it's the law of efficiency.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The fourth most popular is they let corporate influence overwhelm

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the influence of voters. Arguably that's arguably the big donors.

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And then in the single digits you have they trade

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>favors with lobbyists or special interests. They cater only to

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the extremes that don't look out for everyone. What's interesting

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is that none of the definitions were they steal money.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>So the point is is that what the word you know,

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and I it is what the voters think is corrupt

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating, and I think that it is in some ways.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>It is sort of like you're you're you're ripping off

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the democracy, right. And what I appreciate about this about

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>where the donors are the voters are on this. Listen

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, the donors the voters are on this, is

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're a little more sophisticated on what's corrupt. They

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>say that, hey, that that corrupts the democracy, that gets

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the way of you representing the average person. And

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a case where the voters are ahead of

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the politicians, right. The politicians don't speak of corruption this way. Right,

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they speak of corruption like breaking the law, corruption thinking,

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think they're all afraid that if you define

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>corruption the way the public defines it, which is profiting,

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, having you know, essentially personal financial gain while

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>serving in office, you know, trying to just stay into office,

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>always worrying about raising money, always catering to donors. A

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of politicians, if you said, do you think that's corrupt, like, wow,

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the system's corrupt, but I'm not, you know, they might

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>blame the system.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 2>They wish they wouldn't do it that way.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that voters think this is anyway just

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting and it also tells me that voters are man,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the pitchforks are out, the pitchforks are ready, and I

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I do not think.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Large corporations and the tech industry is aware of this

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and is ready for what's coming. And I certainly think

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders in both parties don't fully appreciate it.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's another question that came through that I want to

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 2>share it.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>How well do you think government serves each of the

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 1>following groups? Okay, the very wealthy, eighty six percent said

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they think government serves the very wealthy somewhat or very well,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty six percent. About businesses, all right, seventy four percent

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>say the government serves it serves businesses somewhat or very well.

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>How about racial and ethnic minorities, Well, guess what, Only

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent believe government serves them well. Fifty seven

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>percent believes they do not serve racial or ethnic minorities

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>very well at all, or not well at all completely

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or not not well completely all. How about you personally?

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You personally, that number is thirty is just under forty percent.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't one of those cases where well, I

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think Congress is, but I like my member of Congress,

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Congress looks out for the interest of

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, but they also look out for me. Nope,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know they most people think they they're served slightly

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>better in government than racial and ethnic minorities, but not

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>too well. And then when you throw out ordinary people,

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that number is.

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 2>That means.

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Three and four voters believe ordinary people are not served

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>well at all in some form or another by government.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 2>What it tells you is that there's a.

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>There's an appetite out there for government reform, for democracy reform.

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>You just have to frame it in a way that

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just say, hey, do you want government to serve you better?

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>This is why it doesn't serve you well. The system

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is rigged against you, which I think the folks believe

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the system is rigged against them. They just have yet

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to find a politician that has sold them a struck

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>sure that makes sense and that they believe will work.

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That I think is the missing piece here, right. Bertie

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and a Donald Trump have convinced seventy percent of

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.439
<v Speaker 1>America that the system's rigged against them. Okay, that's that's

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. What there is an agreement on is whether

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>government itself is redeemable to do it, and whether it's

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to need a singular individual.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 2>That's what Donald Trump believes that.

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't the system can't be trusted to do it,

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>versus Bertie Sanders, who said, well, you got topend the

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 1>entire system, but then the system can be can be

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>can be trusted on this. Here's one more question to

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>share with you, just to show you.

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 2>The definition of how.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Much corruption do you think there is in the Trump administration? Well,

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>among independents, forty percent said there's a great deal and

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>another twelve percent said there's a moderate amount. So fifty

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent said there's at least a great deal or

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a moderate amount of coruption in the Trump administration. And

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>if you throw in the nine percent that say a

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>small amount, right, so there's only thirty nine percent says

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's no corruption at all in the Trump administration.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, but guess what how much corruption do you

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think there was in the Biden administration? Well, twenty eight

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>percent said there was a great deal, another thirteen percent

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>said there was a moderate amount, another twelve percent said

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a small amount, Which means you had a

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>majority that believed there was some corruption. You only had

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent. So you have thirty nine percent believe

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no corruption in Trump administration, and you have forty

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>seven percent believing there's no corruption. This is just among independents,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but a majority of independents believe there's some form of

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>corruption in the Biden administration. A majority of independents say

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some form of corruption in the Trump administration. Look,

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the point they're trying to say. I think the point

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that Searchlight is trying to say is we look framing.

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Framing reform issues through the lens of corruption might get

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>people's attention better. Right, if you talk about the financing

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of campaigns through a through the prism of corruption. If

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the lack of regulation of big tech

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>through the prism of corruption, if you talk about entrenched

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>power in term limits through the prism of corruption, you're

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely to get an audience to listen to you,

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, you're going to be able to talk

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to the voters who are the most skeptical of the

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>two parties right now, those that are self described independence

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>are no parties. So anyway, in this moment that we're

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>living in, right, we're basically, you know, we've got back

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to back presidencies where we're not quite sure that the

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>actual president you know, is up to the job, you know,

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>has the temperament of the faculties to do the job

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the way it needs to be done. You also then

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have a growing coalition of voters that are believing the

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>system itself is rotting. And this is this Look.

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's about.

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Affordability at home, and in order to speak to a

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>certain segment of voters, you're going to have to make

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it about that. But connecting the struggle to affordability through

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>corruption is potentially a potent force. And I will just

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. Anytime we've had big changes in election,

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>big midterm waves, there's always been an element of corruption

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that has helped fuel it. You know, in nineteen ninety four,

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we had members of Congress. We were just two years

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>removed from a check where members of Congress could bounce

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>checks without having a bank account. It was just weird

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>system where only Congress could write checks for money that

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 2>It was crazy.

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to know more about it, you know,

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back on my time machine in a couple

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>months we'll talk about it. But but go take a

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>look in two thousand and six, there was sort of

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the corruption of Jack Abramoff and Tom Delay was that

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>arguably in twenty ten and in twenty fourteen, Republicans were

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 1>using more of sort of the fear of sort of

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the growth of government. It was less so less so

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>corruption fueling that one. But when you see for the

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>most our corruption usually plays role, especially when you see

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a total flip. Right ninety four, both the House that

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Republicans went, both the House and the Senate. There was this,

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, movement for term limits, movement for against entrenched power.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You had the check bouncing scandal, et cetera. Two thousand

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 1>and six also saw both houses flip. In this case

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Republican a Democrat, you know, the addition of

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Abramoff stuff and sort of the takeover of

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 1>K Street.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 2>You know that had it.

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that is a potential potent force

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>here if if Democrats figure out how to tap into

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it in a credible way. Right, It's important It's important

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to note they think, you know, independence think Trump's corrupt,

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>more corrupt than Biden.

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 2>But they also.

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Majority thought the Biden administration was corrupt too, So it's

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest road for Democrats to go down. But

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it will make sense if you're a new candidate, if

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you're somebody without the baggage of a previous era, a

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>previous entity, or a previous administration. Do you hate hangovers,

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out of Office gives you

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the social buzz without the next day regret. They're best selling.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Out of Office gummies were designed to provide a mild,

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>relaxing buzz, boost your mood, and enhance creativity and relaxation.

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>With five different strengths, you can tailor the dose to

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fit your vibe, from a gentle one point five milligram

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>micro dose to their newest fifteen milligram gummy for a

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>more elevated experience. Their THHC beverages and gummies are a modern,

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>mindful alternative to a glass of wine or a cocktail.

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you this, I've given up booze. I

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like the hangovers. I prefer the gummy experience. Soul

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is a wellness brand that leave feeling good, should be

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fun and easy. Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived THHC

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and CBD products, all designed to boost your mood and

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>simply help you unwind, so if you struggle to switch

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>off at night. Sol also has a variety of products

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>specifically designed to just simply help you get a better

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>night's sleep, including their top selling Sleepy Gummies. It's a

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>fan favorite for deep restorative sleep. So bring on the

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>good vibes and treat yourself to sold today. Right now,

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off your entire order.

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So go to get sold dot com use the promo

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>code toodcast. Don't forget that code. That's getsold dot Com

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>promo code toodcast for thirty percent off. All right, I

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>got my top five list. It is Wednesday to Top

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>five top estop and I thought i'd give you the

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to give you maybe the Chuck Todd Holiday Book

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>buying gift guide, if you will. These are five books

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that I think are worth reading this year. Doesn't mean

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they are my five favorite books of the year, but

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they were five books that I found informative, important.

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Or interesting or a little bit of both.

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So number five on that list is a book that

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>did not come out this year. It actually came out

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, and it's not a book that

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of attention. But it is now a

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>book that I would recommend to anybody that works in

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the world of finance or works in the world of business,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that they need to go pick up a copy in

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks and read. And it is called

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>The Drift, and it is by Kevin Hassett. So why

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 1>do I say you need to write this book read

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>this book? Well, this is a book that got very

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>little attention when it came out. He wrote this book

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>probably assuming he was never going to work in another

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. The book came out just after the twenty

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty election. Kevin Hassett worked in the first trumpet. He's

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the few people that worked in a high

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:14.240
<v Speaker 1>profile position in the first Trump administration as an economic

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 1>advisor and has made it to a second Trump administration.

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's basically him. Steven Miller, right, and I guess Russell

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Voight was was there, but more in a in a

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>lower capacity. But Kevin Hassett very well, maybe the next

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Federal Reserve, and so understanding his worldview

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and much of his worldview, he's sort of The point

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of The Drift is he basically defends the Trump era,

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>defends his work with Trump and the Trump era. As look,

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there may be a lot of things not to like

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about Donald Trump the person, which he's sort of, which

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>he hinsid in this book, but that he was a

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>necessary correction for what was a drift towards socialism that

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was taking place not just inside the Democratic Party but

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in various institutions of academy and the media, etc. It

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is how he frames his book. Regardless of whether you

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>agree with that framing or not, I would argue, if

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a well informed person about understanding

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where's the FED going, what does Hassett believe? How does

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he interpret Trump's beliefs? How does he defend Trump? Kevin

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>asked somebody who sort of came up in the world

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of the same world that Alan Greenspan came up through.

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was sort of an acolyte at times

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of green Span. So I think it is It is

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>as illuminating as any ex staffer book is going to be,

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because what this book wasn't unlike say Pence's book or

0:48:55.600 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton's book. It is it's a total evisceration of

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. It is more of an observation. You know,

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there's he takes pride. So it is not an antagonistic

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 1>book on Trump, but I think it's one of these.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people realized he wrote a book. It

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a lot of attention. It's you know, it's

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not the I'm not going to tell you it's

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the world's greatest read, but I think it's an important read.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I know some of you listen to my podcast just

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, whether you love or hate the direction

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I take this podcast. You were looking for usable information, Well,

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you reading this book will give you

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>plenty of usable information to navigate a FED and a

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>central bank that could be run by Kevin Hassett. And

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you get to get ahead of the game, get to

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>know the book before senators start asking him questions during

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>his confirmation hearing about the book. All right, so that's

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>number five. Number four is the Mark Twain book by

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Ron Churnout. I enjoyed it for the most part, but

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, not as much as I enjoyed his

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Grant Book. I did enjoy his Grant Book more, but

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot about Mark Twain, and in some ways,

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Mark Twain is arguably, you know, the closest thing that

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we had in the nineteenth century to a quote unquote influencer, right,

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>an outsider and outside force who could who could stir

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the pot of the country and could galvanize the country

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>on certain issues if he so chose. You know, now

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a million Mark Twain's right. You know, would

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:47.400
<v Speaker 1>today's Mark. Would Mark Twain himself be on YouTube? He

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>probably would. He certainly would have a Would he have

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or would he be more.

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:52.439
<v Speaker 2>Of a monologue kind of guy?

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Right? Would he interview others or would he just simply

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>opine on a given day?

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's a.

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy sure now because he's what I do. The

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 1>best part of his books. It isn't just learning more

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about the individual he's talking about, but he's just does

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a great job of capturing the era as well. You know,

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>it's the little details, it's that stuff, trying to understand

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the world that these folks were living in at the time,

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not just trying to understand the psyche of them in

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that moment. So but I think that Twain in some

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ways the quintessential American, a model for so many, so

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>many of us, good, bad or otherwise just a it's

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a timely it's a timely moment. It's timely, you know

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's timely. It's a wrong word. No, it's more

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of a timeless biography, if you will. But I think

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an important one, and it came out this year, so

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think it should be on your gift liss.

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Number three is one that you may not be surprised.

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That I'm pushing again, and it's the right Thompson book

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>called The Barn. I don't know if it technically came

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.399
<v Speaker 1>out this year or not. I don't think it did.

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it came out last year. But as you know,

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know it's this first of all, it's just this

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is a really just a great book to read. It

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>is if you want to write, what it's like to

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>read somebody who just is just better with words than

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>most people in your life are.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right Thompson.

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And I love I hope you had a chance to

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to the interview with him. Those of you that did,

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've already bought the book. It is such

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a compelling read. But the sort of the idea behind

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the book, right that here was something that happened within

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five miles of where he grew up right. Emmett

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Till killed in a barn just within essentially the same

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>neighbor you know, in the same larger community that he

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>grew up in, that right Thompson grew up in, and

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know anything about it. It's amazing how little

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of our own, a little of our local history. We

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes know the good or the bad history. And so

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, reading the book, I hope a lesson

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to hey, don't forget to look around where you live.

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to learn the history of your own neighborhood.

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You may be surprised on how much you learn and

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:32.720
<v Speaker 1>how much it may matter in the in the grand

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.879
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things. So that's number three. Number four on

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my list is one hundred and seven Days Kamala Harris's

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>memoir about her campaign.

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I've spent a lot of time talking about the book

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 1>when it came out, but I did enjoy it. I

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can debate whether this was good for

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>her future political career or bad for her future political career, but.

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Guess what it felt like. It was.

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes these memoirs are so dishonest art or they're honest,

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.879
<v Speaker 1>but they're but they're sanitized. This didn't feel very sanitized.

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>This felt different, and you know, it's interesting about her.

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 2>I was having this.

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Conversation with Crystalism and he said, you know, who had

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the He asked who had the worst, best or worst

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight. You know, we both agreed that Gavin Newsom,

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>for anybody think about running for president of the Democratic side,

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom probably had the best twenty twenty eight. He

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>believes that Kamala Harris at the worst. I don't. I

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with him on it. I understood the case saying, well,

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, she made everybody mad, and it's true, right,

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>she seems to have she seems to have thrown a

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>few matches at a few of the bridges that she's

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 1>crossed over the years. Right then, maybe she burned a

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>bridge with Biden World, Maybe she burned a bridge with

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Shapiro, Maybe she burned a bridge with Mark Kelly.

0:54:54.880 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she burned a bridge with Gavin Newsom. But there

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was another part of me that was surprised at her

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:07.439
<v Speaker 1>candor and she didn't play the type. You know, she's

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>been a politician that's been very careful over the years,

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and she chose to be less careful in this memoir.

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this a different Kamala Harris? Is this the beginning

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of a different relationship she wants to have with with

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:22.839
<v Speaker 1>her political career, a different way she would go about

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:23.760
<v Speaker 1>running for office.

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:26.280
<v Speaker 2>The point is is that I think there's.

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot to learn about one hundred and scent about

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of the state of the Democratic Party Circle twenty

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. But I found it quite compelling, and it was,

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a hard read. Especially you know, it

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like it's like reading the director's notes

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on a movie you already saw, but in some ways

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the director's notes help you understand the movie even a

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit better.

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you will.

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not wasting your time by reading this book. I

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's something to learn the number one book, and

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the middle of it now, but I think

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it is absolutely consequential reading Sarka twenty twenty five is

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a book called Fateful Hours. It is by Vulkar Ulrich

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's been translated from the original German by a

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>gentleman named Jefferson Chase, and it is a new take

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the collapse of the Weimar Republic, the democracy that

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was in place after World War one and before the

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 1>rise of Hitler. Why did it fall? How did it collapse?

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>What were the warning signs. There's a lot of commentary

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>about how democracies fail, how republics die. Well, this is

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:45.719
<v Speaker 1>an example of a republic that died one hundred years

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>ago and in its place came made off Hitler. How

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>did it happen? How could such a modern westernized place

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do this. Let's just say I have found it both

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:04.800
<v Speaker 1>reassuring and arming, but most importantly it's eye opening.

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 2>And look, I is the they must.

0:57:10.840 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Read article of the month that I gave you last

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:17.959
<v Speaker 1>episode from the political quarterly of the Council on Foreign

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Relations called Foreign Affairs, about this idea that we the

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>United States, have slipped from a democracy to something called

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>competitive authoritarianism. Let's just say this is a pretty good

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 1>companion read, and I think one that will round out.

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You read all five of these books. Okay, you read

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>all five of these books, and I think you will

0:57:44.480 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be as well informed and as ready for the political

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>landscape that we are all having to navigate going in

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty six. So my five books, The Drift

0:57:56.360 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by Kevin Hassett, The Mark Twain Biography by Ron Chernoud,

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Barn, the place where Ed Mattil was killed by

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Wright Thompson one hundred and seven days by Kamala Harris,

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and my number one recommendation book that you should be

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>reading going into twenty twenty six fateful hours, the collapse

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of the wim Are Republic.

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 2>So there you go.

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 1>There's your shopping list for the political junkie in your life.

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:40.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:58:54.320 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

0:59:00.720 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred fifty thousand dollars,

0:59:04.320 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country.

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>They know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer, You need somebody to get your back.

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Check out for the People dot Com, Slash podcast or

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Dow Pound Law Pound five two nine law on your

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same.

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>unless they win. All right, let's do a little ass.

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Ask Chuck. First question today comes from Jason in

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 2>NY otherwise known as New York.

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>He goes, Hey, I really appreciate the bonus episodes that

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you put out recently as political events have warnted, I

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>too believed that the Indiana GOP's rebuke of Trump and

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump's revolting comments about Rob Reiner were significant enough moments

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to call for quick reactions. Hope to see if more

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of those in the future.

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, I appreciate it. Look, I go hot and cold

0:59:56.960 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 2>on that.

0:59:57.280 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be I'm not you know, somebody

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>who's just chasing you know, I don't want to be

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>here quote chasing the news, if you will. But I

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>also think that that if I think I have something

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to add and trying to add a perspective about how

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you should think about a major event. That's when I

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>try to try to chime in on that. And I

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think these were both significant events, and I think that

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to trigger larger discussions.

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the INDIANAGOP rebuke is a reminder that something

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that I've been sort of forecasting for the last three months.

1:00:34.480 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I send you back to a sub steck I think

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I wrote in late September early October, which the cracks

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the coalition were beginning to show. And then you know,

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>right after that piece, we've seen more and more examples

1:00:45.480 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, whether it's Marjorie Taylor Green, whether it's

1:00:47.440 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Indiana Republicans, and YadA, YadA, YadA. So it is,

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is part of this is just time, right,

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>No political movement has that I can think of in

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>our history, has been able to go more than more

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>than eight to ten years. And we're sort of we're

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end, right, We're at the We're at the We're.

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>At the beginning of the end. We're not the end.

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not the end of the end, it's at the

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:12.960
<v Speaker 2>end of the beginning. Okay.

1:01:12.960 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that we're past the end of the beginning.

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at the beginning of the end, and

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, it's everything is going to get

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get worse for him everything. You know,

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You're going to see the Republicans fracture a little bit

1:01:26.720 --> 1:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>more the closer.

1:01:27.880 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>We get to election day.

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So look, I'm not saying some new outside event that

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>none of us have thought of won't create a rally

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>around the flag effect. There's always there are always possibilities.

1:01:37.880 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>There's always the one percent, the two percent chances where

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>things go another direction. But on the trajectory we're on

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and assuming sort of you know, events that take place

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>within the normal sort of set of expectations that we have,

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this is only going to get more acute. And then,

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, on the writer thing, I really think it.

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a reason I'm framing it as a

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do we need to be thinking about whether he's this

1:02:08.680 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning of his own downfall of is just

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>his basic capacity. If you don't have a filter for

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>something like this anymore, what else is not going so well?

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is one of those that we

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>needed this. This for me is a bit more alarming

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because either staff was afraid to tell him this was

1:02:31.640 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy or they did and he did it anyway, right,

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And so these felt significant enough. So I appreciate you noticing,

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but I promise you I don't want to go down,

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, chasing every squirrel down that road.

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>All right. Next question comes from Eric.

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>From another question from New York. Given the competitiveness of

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Ohio and Iowa US center races, do you think a

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrat could win the Florida center race?

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks?

1:02:57.120 --> 1:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Eric, Well, look, all the ingredients are they are for

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>a competitive race. You have an appointed senator. The history

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of appointed senators in general indicate that, you know, they're

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the most you know, they're more vulnerable than even a

1:03:12.800 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>first term senator trying to seek reelection. Appointed senators, you know,

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have the have the worst of all worlds, right they

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they have the they're an incumbent without any of the

1:03:24.520 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>upside of incumbency. They only have the downsides of it.

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:32.479
<v Speaker 1>So there's that, right, And Ashley Moody's you know, she's

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not a well known political figure yet, but Florida's very expensive,

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and that Florida Democratic Party is just structurally so far behind,

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, shared Brown has an organization that these almost

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>turn key for Ohio Democrats. And even though that's a

1:03:51.160 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>state where overall the Democratic Party is in worshi Democratic

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe brand is in worship in Ohio than it is

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. Structurally, they're already more competitive Iowa be in

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a smaller state. They have a very strong gubernatorial candidate

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in Rob Sand That also helps it be competitive. I

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>do think that if the governor's race gets competitive, then

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate race will automatically start to get more competitive.

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Keep an eye out on Jared Moscowitz. I think if

1:04:17.560 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he ends up running. He's a member of Congress. He's

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>been on this podcast, he said. I asked him point

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>blank if he was thinking about running statewide and he said, well,

1:04:26.680 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if they redistrict me and he would be among the targets.

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And I do think Florida still might. I mean, I'll

1:04:32.640 --> 1:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be curious to see whether Indiana's rejection of redistricting if

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it means the fever's broken. But if we do have

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two more states that engage in this, it's gonna be

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Florida in Virginia, one for the Team Red and one

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for Team Blue. And we'll see what kind of We'll

1:04:51.560 --> 1:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know pretty quickly. I think Jared moscow It's could be

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful Senate candidate if because he said, if

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets redistrict he represents of northern Broward County southern

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Palm Beach County, they could sort of make it a

1:05:06.360 --> 1:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>bit you know already was only sort of a I

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think a plus two Harris district. He could turn. It

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>could turn into something that he's buyinging. And he basically

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>said if if they go after his district, then he'll

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>probably just run for the Senate. There's a candidate in

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>there now, somebody who's a school board part of the

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>school board wars with the Moms of Liberty. It's an

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>organization on the left that went after Moms for Liberty

1:05:30.840 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and somebody there. But you know she's got a You're

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a financial commitment unless you get

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a higher profile candidate. Moscowtz might be a high profile

1:05:39.360 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>enough where he could bring a decent a decent financial

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>following with him. But I don't think the Senate race

1:05:49.080 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gets competitive without the governor's race being competitive, and that's

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>an open question. I do think that Democrats ended up

1:05:56.320 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with two pretty good candidates in the governor's race, and

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>David Johny and Jerry dem One could argue one of

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>them out a run in the center race, that they've

1:06:03.120 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>got too many good candidates in the governor's race, not

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>enough good candidates in the Senate race. But we'll say,

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do think it should be. But the cost

1:06:15.080 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is it's so prohibitive. I think they're more likely to

1:06:18.240 --> 1:06:22.439
<v Speaker 1>spend money targeting Mississippi and trying to put Mississippi in play,

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>which is not as far fetched as you might think,

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>because five million dollars, you know, an extra five to

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars in Mississippi would have a huge impact.

1:06:33.560 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>An extra five to ten million dollars in Florida would

1:06:36.240 --> 1:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have minimal impact. Next question comes from tboor Shinto from Toronto.

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>He says, longtime listener watcher from Toronto here, I have

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a possibly naive question about journalism in the US. Why

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't reporters directly challenge the president when he makes inappropriate

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive statements like the ones about Rob Ryner are calling

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>journalists stupid. Many in the media react on TV or

1:06:57.840 --> 1:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in print, but rarely pushed back to his face in

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Why isn't anyone asked him directly why he

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>behaves that way, maybe using more polite language, just curious

1:07:04.800 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>why no one takes that shot. Thanks for all the

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>great insights. Well, I would argue in the first term,

1:07:09.200 --> 1:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we all did. I would ask him questions about it.

1:07:12.640 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I confronted him directly an off the record meeting during

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:20.439
<v Speaker 1>when he was president elect, basically saying when he name

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>checks our correspondence in the field, he puts their lives

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at risk, He puts a spotlight on him in ways

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that I believe he didn't intend, is how I put it.

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's a reason I think in Trump

1:07:35.360 --> 1:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>two point zero why so many people in these same

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>positions that some of us were in have chosen not

1:07:41.160 --> 1:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it Because none of you know, nobody wants

1:07:44.880 --> 1:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be fodder to help somebody else's social media following,

1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's this belief that it doesn't

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do what you think it's going to do, and if anything,

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it only it only.

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>It only puts you.

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>In a position of having to debate the president, right,

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>which is you're.

1:08:11.560 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Just so it's.

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of us don't want to be a story,

1:08:19.840 --> 1:08:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to insert ourselves, not out of fear,

1:08:22.800 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>out of distraction. We don't want to be used as

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.479
<v Speaker 1>a you know, I didn't like it. I always whenever

1:08:29.520 --> 1:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I got a whiff of a guest trying to use

1:08:33.000 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>an appearance to raise money to don't fundraise, you know,

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I did my best to gum that up. There's a

1:08:41.560 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly memorable back and forth I had with Ted Cruz

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>one time that it was clear he accepted the invitation

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>only to try to use me as an attempt for

1:08:55.479 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>political fundraising fodder. But the own of the conversation went

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that he would have been a

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>self owned had he tried it. I didn't realize that's

1:09:08.560 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what he was up to until about halfway through the interview,

1:09:10.360 --> 1:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, oh, now I know why you

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>came on. And it was just anyway it was during

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the first impeachment. If you want to go back and

1:09:19.320 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>go find that back and forth that I had with him,

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just say I'll just use three letters to give

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you a hint about where the conversation went to JFK

1:09:29.120 --> 1:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just let you know and you can sort

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of imagine where the where that part of the conversation went.

1:09:35.920 --> 1:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the That's why you know, it

1:09:39.600 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like it gets you anywhere, and it I

1:09:43.960 --> 1:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say journalists don't do it out of fear.

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Fear is the wrong word. I think terms of it's

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like is it effective? Like ultimately, what is

1:09:53.720 --> 1:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>our role? Is your role to get information out to understand?

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I could tell you the private conversations I've had with

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>him about this. I'm like, why do you you know

1:10:04.200 --> 1:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you do that?

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>You know?

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He he sort of has always viewed the press as

1:10:10.360 --> 1:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>playing a part, like almost like the chorus and a

1:10:13.840 --> 1:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare play, that we're all playing a role, and his

1:10:18.920 --> 1:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>role is to go after the press. The press is

1:10:21.680 --> 1:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of that, you know, I've always equated it. He

1:10:23.800 --> 1:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>sees us all as if you're familiar with the WWF

1:10:27.280 --> 1:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>slash WWE And I have the reason I used WWF

1:10:30.400 --> 1:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is back in my day, it was the WWF and

1:10:33.080 --> 1:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a guy named the press person was a

1:10:36.120 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>guy named gene Okerland, mean gene Oakerland, and he was who,

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the wrestlers picked on because he was

1:10:43.520 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the press, you.

1:10:44.280 --> 1:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Know, et cetera.

1:10:45.479 --> 1:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And I always said that that Trump sort of viewed

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>us as mean gene Oakerland, that we were kind of

1:10:49.240 --> 1:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in on the joke, and he would say even say

1:10:52.120 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>things to me like, oh, this is good for your ratings,

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>it's good for your name. I d you know, it

1:10:56.479 --> 1:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>only gives you more attention, it only makes you more money,

1:10:59.240 --> 1:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it only gives you or book deals. That was his

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mindset about it back then. It's I think that's a

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>little more nefarious.

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But I don't, you know, what what do you expect?

1:11:14.320 --> 1:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect him to say? Sometimes when you ask,

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I understand sort of like, you know, I'd

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>rather press him on why is he pardoning a convicted

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>drug Uh? Why did he pardon somebody who was convicted

1:11:30.720 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of being a drug trafficker? Are you taking you know?

1:11:35.520 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you know?

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Did it? You know?

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do you pardon your friends?

1:11:40.320 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 2>You know?

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Why did you pardon you know, Henry Kuayer? You know,

1:11:43.240 --> 1:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there are other questions that if you have

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the chance at a shot a question, because let's say,

1:11:48.040 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, why did you say that about Rob Bryner

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and his answer, I can tell you what his answer was, Well,

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he attacked me first. It's always that's always usually his

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>defense when they came after me. You know, I wouldn't

1:11:58.120 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have said anything had they not said this. You know,

1:12:00.880 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>he always says, I don't attack people, I defend myself,

1:12:07.840 --> 1:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so but I could, but I definitely you're right, there

1:12:11.880 --> 1:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is less of this in Trump two point zero because

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>many of us tried this in Trump one point oh,

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't seem to go anywhere, It didn't seem

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to didn't really produce an answer. You know, I think

1:12:26.200 --> 1:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people, and I'm you know that

1:12:28.840 --> 1:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to this podcast that want the press to express

1:12:32.400 --> 1:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the outrage that they have. But it's the equivalent of

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>punching your you know, punching a wall, a dry wall.

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might punch a hole in the wall

1:12:45.000 --> 1:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and you might feel strong, but then you've got to

1:12:46.880 --> 1:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>go back and patch up the wall, and what have

1:12:48.320 --> 1:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you really accomplished? You know, you can express your outrage

1:12:52.320 --> 1:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at him, he doesn't say anything satisfactory, and whatever he

1:12:56.479 --> 1:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>says will outrage people who are already outraged.

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>And so it's.

1:13:03.600 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that's you know, I don't and

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's not a satisfactory answer to you. I get it,

1:13:10.200 --> 1:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there comes a point of you know,

1:13:14.080 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is there anything to be gained in understanding more about him?

1:13:20.120 --> 1:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Or are you just trying to go viral for yourself

1:13:23.760 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>right to Hey, look, I took on Donald Trump. Some

1:13:28.240 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of us are not in the game of just making

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this about ourselves, right, and so I think that's also

1:13:35.479 --> 1:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>also plays a role on that front. Next question comes

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>from Adam w Any writes, I'm curious about your thoughts

1:13:41.400 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>on this. Affordability seems to be the central theme that

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Democrats seem to be winning on. One of the sneaky

1:13:46.680 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>culprits of rising costs is the complete lack of competition

1:13:49.200 --> 1:13:51.479
<v Speaker 1>and various segments of the economy. Perhaps it is the

1:13:51.520 --> 1:13:53.519
<v Speaker 1>lawyer in me, but I don't understand why democrats haven't

1:13:53.560 --> 1:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>begun at least bringing up the issue of breaking up

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>big monopolies. Thanks Adam w.

1:14:00.000 --> 1:14:01.479
<v Speaker 2>So, you're right, I think that.

1:14:03.640 --> 1:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think there's going to be a fear

1:14:06.000 --> 1:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing that, but you know there's you know, I

1:14:09.920 --> 1:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think the the stuff that's popular is when you point

1:14:13.680 --> 1:14:19.519
<v Speaker 1>out how these monopolies are costing you money. And so

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I just had a interview with an economist on my

1:14:24.880 --> 1:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>newsphere show a couple episodes ago where we spent a

1:14:27.920 --> 1:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on the issue of surveillance pricing and

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have this. We have this phenomenon

1:14:35.840 --> 1:14:39.439
<v Speaker 1>these days of dynamic pricing, where basically the new goal

1:14:39.760 --> 1:14:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is to figure out, Hey, how do I maximize you know,

1:14:46.000 --> 1:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you Chuck Todd have a little bit more money to

1:14:48.680 --> 1:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>spend versus you Jane Doe, who has less money to spend.

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to have you both as customers. But I

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you can pay more than Jane Doe. How

1:15:02.040 --> 1:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>can I get you to pay more in Jane Doe

1:15:03.880 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay me something? And I think that you know,

1:15:10.000 --> 1:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>whether we've seen that airlines are thinking about going down

1:15:12.960 --> 1:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this road. There was a really good story and I

1:15:16.800 --> 1:15:19.559
<v Speaker 1>think it was the Washington Post about Uber and lyft

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and how you know, on one phone, you know, based

1:15:24.080 --> 1:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on information they may have about you, the price is

1:15:26.640 --> 1:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing. On another phone, based on information they have

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on the person who owns that phone, the price for

1:15:32.400 --> 1:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the same ride from the same location to the same

1:15:35.000 --> 1:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>location is suddenly different. And how much of it is

1:15:38.320 --> 1:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>based on what they think you're sort of Oh, I'm not,

1:15:41.080 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that's too expensive for me versus that And

1:15:48.280 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the type of of discrimination that will

1:15:55.439 --> 1:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really sort of, you know, middle class discrimination is when

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the middle class grabs the pitchforks watch out right, like,

1:16:05.240 --> 1:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when the supposedly comfortable, you know, enough

1:16:10.080 --> 1:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to own a home, you know, have a couple, have

1:16:12.880 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>two cars, be able to afford kids college, all that stuff,

1:16:18.120 --> 1:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and they feel as if they're being taken advantage of

1:16:21.439 --> 1:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because they have a couple extra dollars, you know, the

1:16:24.439 --> 1:16:29.519
<v Speaker 1>middle and the upper middle class revolting. That's that's when

1:16:29.640 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>politicians sometimes finally finally start to pay attention to some

1:16:33.000 --> 1:16:37.799
<v Speaker 1>of these things. I think it's possible you will see

1:16:38.439 --> 1:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>going after you know, tech monopolies on this, but we're

1:16:45.320 --> 1:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>not quite there yet because I don't think the public

1:16:48.560 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sees the evidence yet, right. I don't think we're you

1:16:52.400 --> 1:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to. The public needs to be a

1:16:54.640 --> 1:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bit better informed on this, and I think you're seeing

1:16:57.400 --> 1:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>more and more coverage that's focused on so of how

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>consolidation in various industries has cost the consumer money. Now,

1:17:06.080 --> 1:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what I think has been the you know,

1:17:07.960 --> 1:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think local media used to do consumer reporting a

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:13.839
<v Speaker 1>lot better than national media, and the loss of local

1:17:13.920 --> 1:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>journalism has really gutted the consumer journalism world. This is

1:17:19.800 --> 1:17:23.519
<v Speaker 1>where influencers, I think, come in, and this is something

1:17:23.560 --> 1:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think, if you know, I think trusted media

1:17:27.120 --> 1:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was higher when we had a lot more consumer reporters

1:17:29.960 --> 1:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to saving consumers money and from being ripped off.

1:17:34.240 --> 1:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And the lion's share of those reporters were on the

1:17:36.760 --> 1:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>local level. So the gutting of local gutted out the

1:17:41.120 --> 1:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>reporters that were providing a real service to average Americans.

1:17:45.800 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think the you know, this is among my goals.

1:17:48.280 --> 1:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Why do I want to revitalize local news because I

1:17:50.880 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is the biggest missing piece when it comes

1:17:53.479 --> 1:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to the lack of trust that we have nationally with media,

1:17:57.800 --> 1:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is we lost our local character references and they did

1:18:00.800 --> 1:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a better job worrying about helping people on a local

1:18:05.280 --> 1:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>level than we have the ability to do on the

1:18:07.720 --> 1:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>national level. And so I think if once we know

1:18:12.520 --> 1:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there's more reporting locally on scams and pricing discrimination and

1:18:18.400 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>things like that, which is where you're more likely to

1:18:20.479 --> 1:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>see this, then you'll hit critical mass and it becomes

1:18:24.320 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly something that they want politicians to do something about.

1:18:28.840 --> 1:18:30.519
<v Speaker 1>All Right, The last question for today is going to

1:18:30.560 --> 1:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>come from Dave, and he writes, is Chuck really enjoy

1:18:32.680 --> 1:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast? Appreciate the mixture of politics, history, and college

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>football right on. Also love the guests you have for

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>interviews and all the information that comes from those conversations.

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us how interview prep has changed for

1:18:43.280 --> 1:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you from the shorter time limits you had to meet

1:18:44.760 --> 1:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the press to now being able to do long form

1:18:46.840 --> 1:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>interviews on the podcast. Would love to hear some of

1:18:48.520 --> 1:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on what you think makes a great guest

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation on your show. Thanks and happy holidays. Well, the

1:18:54.640 --> 1:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing is just right just having more time it

1:18:57.520 --> 1:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>means that I spend more time on a specific policy

1:19:04.960 --> 1:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that the guests may have in wanting to go four,

1:19:09.160 --> 1:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>five or six questions deep on said right. In a

1:19:12.240 --> 1:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>meet the press, if somebody who was rolling out a

1:19:13.840 --> 1:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>policy proposal for your eight to ten minute interview, you

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:20.559
<v Speaker 1>do one follow up, maybe you know, maybe a second

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's you think it's really interesting to the viewers,

1:19:24.560 --> 1:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>then you end up moving on. We don't have to

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:30.519
<v Speaker 1>do that here, and that's you know, that.

1:19:30.560 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>To me.

1:19:32.320 --> 1:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Allows for some of the nuanced debate and we end

1:19:35.400 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>up what you get and what I think I'll tell

1:19:37.920 --> 1:19:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you. You ask me what makes a good I think what

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>makes a good conversation is when we end is when

1:19:46.880 --> 1:19:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you end up understanding all sides of an argument without

1:19:49.760 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>having me and the guests debate each other, because hopefully

1:19:54.240 --> 1:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I have asked a few of the let me ask

1:19:56.560 --> 1:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the perspective from the left, let me ask perspective from

1:19:58.720 --> 1:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the right, and needed depending on what their point of

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>view is, and that by the end of the conversation,

1:20:04.560 --> 1:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like that you would understand how this

1:20:06.880 --> 1:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>issue would then get debated between sort of stereotypical left

1:20:11.960 --> 1:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>versus stereotypical right, then I've accomplished something. Right then I've

1:20:15.960 --> 1:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>given you a complete conversation that makes you prepared to

1:20:20.960 --> 1:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>understand this issue no matter where else you end up

1:20:22.880 --> 1:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>getting information about it. I think the best conversations are

1:20:30.400 --> 1:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>when that when I kind of know them a little bit.

1:20:34.040 --> 1:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that always helps because they're more comfortable with

1:20:38.479 --> 1:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>me because they know me a little bit. So I

1:20:40.439 --> 1:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>think those make good conversation better podcast conversations. Obviously, I

1:20:46.840 --> 1:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do take a much less antagonistic posture because this is

1:20:55.800 --> 1:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always say this, you know it meet

1:20:57.680 --> 1:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the press. There was an expectation that this is an

1:21:00.479 --> 1:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>accountability show, and this is where we're gonna you know,

1:21:05.000 --> 1:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got to you're test, you're testing your your beliefs

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:10.519
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you're you gotta, you gotta, you got

1:21:10.520 --> 1:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell them, you know, you got to explain your rationale.

1:21:14.960 --> 1:21:17.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's devoted to a you know, single issue or

1:21:17.560 --> 1:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a topic or a couple of topics versus here where

1:21:22.520 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I may have, you know, a large singular reason for

1:21:27.479 --> 1:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>booking that guest, say, on the issue of how do

1:21:30.320 --> 1:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we open up primaries, uh to to all voters. But

1:21:36.000 --> 1:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it means we can meander around a little bit. But

1:21:43.400 --> 1:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's also you know, not everybody can carry forty five minutes,

1:21:47.760 --> 1:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so you have to be mindful of that, just like

1:21:51.520 --> 1:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people are great ten minute interviews, terrible

1:21:53.800 --> 1:21:54.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty minute.

1:21:54.280 --> 1:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Interviews and vice versa.

1:21:56.200 --> 1:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, you've you've got to you've got

1:21:59.360 --> 1:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to know. But it is I will tell you this,

1:22:05.680 --> 1:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there was only one interview, and I'm not going to

1:22:08.640 --> 1:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>say who it is. You guys might be able to

1:22:10.880 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>figure it out by just listening. There's only one interview

1:22:14.280 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>where I felt like I ran out of questions before

1:22:16.560 --> 1:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I ran out of time. And ultimately that means we're

1:22:21.479 --> 1:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>doing a good job of booking. Because I hope to

1:22:24.880 --> 1:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have the type of guests where we you know, an

1:22:28.200 --> 1:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hour is great, but believe it or not, there were

1:22:31.160 --> 1:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>some questions left on the table. If there are no

1:22:35.240 --> 1:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>questions left on the table, then probably the guest wasn't

1:22:38.000 --> 1:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>quite worth the forty five minutes I may have spent

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>with them. But I actually think since I started this

1:22:42.520 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast re upped this podcast on April, I could think

1:22:47.080 --> 1:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of only once that I sat here and I thought, boy,

1:22:49.960 --> 1:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of exhausted from questions.

1:22:51.720 --> 1:22:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I got to go.

1:22:52.360 --> 1:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of if I finally go twenty minutes

1:22:55.280 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with this interview, am I sending the signal that this

1:22:58.320 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was a total dud?

1:22:59.760 --> 1:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:23:00.120 --> 1:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like I almost didn't want to do I didn't

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think that was fair to the person. So I wanted

1:23:04.360 --> 1:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sure I hit a minimum a minimum time slot.

1:23:09.880 --> 1:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>My guess is I'm not I don't want to. I

1:23:11.360 --> 1:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want you guys to play the guessing game of

1:23:13.960 --> 1:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>who it is. But it's usually pretty obvious when you

1:23:17.520 --> 1:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>know somebody isn't working out. It's usually because they don't

1:23:21.439 --> 1:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>want to answer questions, and you're like, well, why the

1:23:23.120 --> 1:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>hell did you come on here?

1:23:24.600 --> 1:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Right? What did you think this was going to be? Uh?

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And and thankfully, in some ways the format is self selecting.

1:23:33.400 --> 1:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Right if you if you're not comfortable sort of having

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a conversation for forty minutes with me, then you're not

1:23:40.320 --> 1:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>going to come on anyway. So in that sense it

1:23:45.320 --> 1:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>can be self selecting. Look, I wish I've had there

1:23:51.520 --> 1:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are there are a few more Republicans that I've been

1:23:53.720 --> 1:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to come on that won't or haven't

1:23:56.520 --> 1:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>said yes yet. Hopefully they're listening right now, And I

1:24:00.360 --> 1:24:03.519
<v Speaker 1>think I know why. Like it's not that they worried

1:24:03.560 --> 1:24:07.759
<v Speaker 1>about me. They just somehow think that their own voters

1:24:07.800 --> 1:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>will that that that they only want to spend forty

1:24:11.439 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>five minutes talking to their to their base. They're not

1:24:15.360 --> 1:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in talking to swing voters, talking to independence, talking

1:24:20.080 --> 1:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to you the intellectually curious, And that's disappointing to me.

1:24:25.520 --> 1:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I think in it, I think once the Orange Man

1:24:28.520 --> 1:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>leaves the Oval office, these people I've been trying to

1:24:31.080 --> 1:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get to come on will come on. But you know,

1:24:36.479 --> 1:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that in for some for some of these folks,

1:24:38.920 --> 1:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to They don't want to have to

1:24:42.760 --> 1:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>not answer a question that they know is logical for

1:24:45.560 --> 1:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>me to ask, which is just a disappointment, all right,

1:24:48.800 --> 1:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but this is the world we live in. Look what

1:24:50.439 --> 1:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Look what Susie Wilds just had to do. You know,

1:24:53.760 --> 1:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>she had to put out an apology tweet for an

1:24:55.800 --> 1:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>audience of one. And there are people that are always

1:24:59.800 --> 1:25:04.360
<v Speaker 1>looking to aggregate and cherry pick what somebody says. Hey,

1:25:04.800 --> 1:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know Tom Cotton said this to Chuck Todd on

1:25:08.080 --> 1:25:12.599
<v Speaker 1>his Todd on his podcast. You know, and you know

1:25:12.720 --> 1:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that's just unfortunately the way things, you know, things get

1:25:15.920 --> 1:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>weaponized on the on the stupid left and the stupid right,

1:25:19.520 --> 1:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>which is right, We know right that it's those it's

1:25:23.320 --> 1:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>those that are in the business of grifting you on ideology.

1:25:27.560 --> 1:25:29.559
<v Speaker 1>And these people exist on the left and the right,

1:25:29.640 --> 1:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>my friends, that have scared off some of these folks

1:25:35.240 --> 1:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>from from coming and swimming in the intellectually curious pool.

1:25:41.080 --> 1:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But hey, come on in, the water's comfortable and if

1:25:45.360 --> 1:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>you're comfortable in your own skin, everything's going to be

1:25:49.520 --> 1:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>easy on the Chuck podcast. But if you're not comfortable

1:25:52.000 --> 1:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in your own skin, then yeah, it's going to be

1:25:55.120 --> 1:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>an uncomfortable forty five minutes.

1:25:57.840 --> 1:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, listen to another round of a great question.

1:26:00.120 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>There's more, a lot more to come. I am also waiting.

1:26:04.200 --> 1:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I am curious. I've not gotten a lot of feedback

1:26:09.000 --> 1:26:13.559
<v Speaker 1>yet from you, specific feedback on where you guys aren't

1:26:13.560 --> 1:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>prediction markets. I just would love an array of experiences,

1:26:18.800 --> 1:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the good, the bad, the ugly, you know again, non sports,

1:26:22.720 --> 1:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the prediction markets, through the prism of non sports everything else.

1:26:26.560 --> 1:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious good experience, bad experience, you know, Are

1:26:33.040 --> 1:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you curious, are you nervous? Any of those things? I am,

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I've expressed to you, I'm cautiously pessimistic about the

1:26:43.200 --> 1:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>prediction markets and yet and keeping an eye on them

1:26:48.760 --> 1:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>because somehow I have a feeling it's going to be

1:26:52.920 --> 1:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>more impactful than we want to admit.

1:26:55.640 --> 1:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

1:26:56.400 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>With that, I'm going to shut it down for another

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours, but I will be back in twenty

1:27:01.000 --> 1:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>four hours, So thank you for listening until we upload again.