WEBVTT - March 5th, Hour 1: Breakout and Deep Sleeper starting pitchers...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do? Do? Do Do too? Yeah?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Is yes, the Fantasy Fast Friends Forever. Here are the

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Freggie staff Well, I am

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Gregg. A happy Tuesday. I got a little Game

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones trail out there, so that was a nice little, uh,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>nice little morning today. Happy about that. You know where

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we're at in the in the time of year. This

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is every year we hit this point, Greg, where it's

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>spring training is going on. You're watching some of these

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>games and you see the sun beating down the weather

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>looks great. Like we're at that time right now where

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>although it's only March, and like we're basically in the

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of winter. It feels like windows should be over

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at least, That's how I feel. So I'm getting out

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of like bed today, and you know, come outside degree point.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the time where you know, things gotta start

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to rush a little bit right about now. So and

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>then we always get like one more snowstorm, we do.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. And I will say this because I've

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I look in the city for for a little while now,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and like I remember being like absolutely frozen walking to work.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't feel your face, can't feel your ears, can't

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>feel her anything. And I've only felt like that this

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>year once or twice. Like it hasn't been a brutally

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>bad winter of act insanely insanely cold temperature, but it

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just feels it's gone for a while, like did You're

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>right about that. You're right about that. It hasn't been

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a brutal winter, Like we have some snow on the

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>ground right now, but we haven't been like blasted. That's

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>why I like everything evens out right Murphy's law, like

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get blasted again before like March is over

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at least, I feel like that isn't that Newton's law

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to think Newton's law, what's Murphy's law? And

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>looking up, I'm not sure like you're talking about like

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're talking about Newton's law. That's what you're

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>referring to. Right, anything that can go wrong, we'll go

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong with Murphy's law. Which law. That's how you're trying,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that's how you're first everything every action will have an

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>equal opposite reaction. I thought everything evens out right. Yeah,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's new. There's too many laws, all right, we

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just laid that on the table right now. Too many laws.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Murphy's law is still kind of applicable to me. Is

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>an adage or epigram that is typically stated as anything

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that can go wrong will go wrong. So there you go.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not like we're talking No, it's exactly what I meant.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking about there's no snow on the

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ground that it hasn't been a bad winter through, which

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>means everything is about to go wrong. Greg, we hope

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not on the fantasy baseball drafts. By the way,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from tonight is our GST draft, which will

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>only be part of if you pay Adams, Yes, anybody,

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why don't I don't. I don't used to.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I said, you're like the highest ranking

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>official like myself, Michael Florio. What's the difference. We're all

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>pay equally. I know, but so it's different. You're responsible

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like I don't. I really don't. If I can you Kin,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just Ben move you the money and you can PayPal.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I I did that last year. What's the difference, Well,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I told you my duty. I told you

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I paid. Are you pay both? Wow? What can't Florida

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>do it? Great question? Get him on the line, Floria,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening. Is it gonna be from a urinal again?

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't need you. I don't need to get the bathroom. Hey,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Kyle Andricks more than cold hamals. I don't

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>need like I don't need. I'm just like the PayPal.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't money in the account. I don't want to

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it. That's all it is. It's just it's easier.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There's like too many money apps now cash kind I

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get I get caught up too much constantly, like

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>moving money around in and out of bank accounts. It's annoying,

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>thistles money, having a cold hard cash. Everyone's rid of it.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Man like stadiums game. He's cash stadiums anymore. It's crazy.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of stadiums, I was at the NET game last night.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You see some Dirk You not how to? I mean

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know if she was there. How how

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was I supposed to know? Greg? Where is big time?

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>She's too big? So yeah, I didn't know she was there.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I ended up on the nets broadcast, had no idea

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>between and they just saw you on TV. It's pretty cool.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>They were probably doing that thing where they show everyone

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>who's like paying respect to dirt because everyone, like everyone

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was standing up with their phones out, Like I thought,

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a forty point game, and and cried the entire

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>crowd is changing like m v P for Dirk whenever

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he touches the ball. I thought more broken was died.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were showing. They were just showing the

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>celebrities are at the game, which why they showed you.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah that's too Yeah they showed it. They showed

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a Rod on the big screen. He was there at

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the game. He was front row. I mean they showed me,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>how are your seats nomen awesome? And I was like

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ten rows behind, Like that's awesome. Sick was right in

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the court too. And how about this

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>gig unlimited food, unlimited food. I didn't take enough advantage

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. I mean I did. I had bonless Buffalo wings,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Nathan's fries, very good, unlimited, not unlimited booze. She made

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that she stressed that. She's like, we can't give

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>you unlimited drinks, so yes, and not alcoholic beverage. That's great,

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to We probably do that again before the

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the season, but like I should go this

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>time in what there was excuse brother, um, all right,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I love that about the nets and the Mavericks and whatnot.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do what people are here for, which is

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>some of these late rast staring pictures. So, as promised,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Florio sent me his point in league rankings. I'm giving

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>him full credit for this, but I have then taken

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>his rankings and separated it into my own rankings, moving

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people up and down, color coding it as I do.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And as I turned my computer around Greg Selsman's rankings

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>boom available on Venmo absolutely for a small fee that

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 1>will be about one cent less than Chris Venter's charging.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Whatever that is to be perfectly, honest, I'm not ready.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know later it was great. So anyway, Yeah,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so we have talked a lot about rankings, and I've

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to use that to move guys up and down

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to my board based on like guys I like. Obviously

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Floria has his own ranks and franks his own rankings,

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to be prepared. I wanted to um,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I have my own rankings for own reasons. So here

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they are, once again polar coded, as I do all rankings.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty cool, right, we're doing a great job, gregs funny.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we dive into second rankings? Let's do it right now,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get right in the story pictures, shall I? We shall?

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>All right? So we we've hit problems. I don't Actually,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>here's the one problem with my rankings. I don't have

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>like numbers next to them, like who the first, second,

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and third, Like, I don't have any of those. It's

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>just an order of the guys that I like it.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So we got through what thirty forty story pictures already

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that? Yeah, I think we ended around like

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray David Price is yesterday, which is right around me. Okay,

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so this whole tier. I feel like we we kind

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of hit um, it's here right after it's here. Five.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Haven't really talked about the guy who uh ed Wara, Rodriguez, Valdi,

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like we brought their names up, Nick Pavetta, Joe must Grove,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Heeney. That's really like, those are the hype guys

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this year? Yeah, so I have those guys all kind

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of similar. Um, some of her in my tier five,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>some of her in my Tier six. Just how I'm

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>broken it up. Um, But if you want to start

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with Rodriguez and Bieber and Pavetta, we could go into

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that if that's cool. Alright, So I have Beeber higher

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>as well. But going into draft season, when I asked

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Frank a, right, who the hype guys this year? Let's

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>really have one of the first conversations I asked before

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the ranking, before I studied anything, who

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>were this year's hype guys? And the two answers he

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>gave me were Shane Bieber and Nick Pavetta. We've talked

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Shane Bieber and what's good with him,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and you look at every advanced metrick. He doesn't walk.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Anybody strikes a ton of guys out. He's gonna be awesome.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I love Shane Beeber. This year, Um, everything in

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the minors has been consistent. We give you the Dians pedigree.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:04.599
<v Speaker 1>We's talk a lot about Shane Baber. I don't I

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think we need to go with Beaver. But the

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>other guy we talked that he gave to me besides

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Shane Beaver Biever was Nick Pavetta. And this one was

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a prize to me, just on the surface,

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like Pavetta, like I've heard his name banded about for

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a while. You look at Philly, it's not a great ballpark.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you have Arietta there, you have arian Nola there.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, um you have my man. Did Evelasquez there

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>my man? And it's like, okay, I like LASKI. I

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>always leave Nivelaska working with a mental health coach in

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the off season. I got. I moved them up, and

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think to move him up high enough. To

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I love Evelaska and move to

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>another tier. This is this is the best part of

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>having rankings. I can move backs up and down. I

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>will agree with what Modica said, is drafting right now

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you do some Best Ball drafts or

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>even mock drafts, that's how you figure out how to

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rank players, Because when you're actually on the spot and

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to decide, oh, do I want you know

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetto, or do I wanted Wardon Rodriguez? Do I

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>want Nick Pavetta, or do I want Shane Bieber. When

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you're actually in that position where you have to make

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that decision yourself and and do the research, that's when

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you kind of figure out, like where these guys should

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>be ranked. So definitely true. So with that being said,

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned on the surface, I didn't get the

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetta love. Are you in on Nick Pavetta? You love?

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And like everybody else does I? I like Nick Pavetta. Um,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I have him. I am thirty four, that's starting pictures.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have Shane Bieber twenty five. I have Pavetta thirty,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so pretty significantly farther. Okay, so I'm moving back to

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.599
<v Speaker 1>where I had him that Okay, there's a lot to

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like here. Look the case for nine last year for

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetta ten point three, the wolfsper nine were under

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>three solid groundball right nearly forty seven percent. What you're

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at here is that the EARRA indicators were much

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>better than the four point seven seven ear A, So

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>don't let that scare you off too much. The x

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>fit was three point four to and the Sierra the

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>extro was three point five one. So there's like, by

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>all indications, his stuff played up to a you know,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sub three six e r A. He's gonna definitely have

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>run support with the Phillies lineup this year. Uh, he

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't allow that much hard contact. He was right around

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent, which was better than league average twelve

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>percent swinging strike rad I mean, that was good enough

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for top twenty among starting pitchers last year. Over sixty

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>percent first pitch strike sixty three percent. I mean, these

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>are all marks that he's hitting right, Like if you

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have the if you're over eleven swing crade, if you're

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>over sixty pst pitch strike, that means you know, three

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>out of five batters that you're facing, you're getting ahead

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in the count. I mean, typically that's what you want. Uh.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And then he's getting people to chase pitches over thirty

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, which is better than league average

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's got a mid nineties fastball, which definitely

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>needs some work. I mean it's it's fast, but it's

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>like Louise Casile, like people bomb the fastball. But he

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>has two legits. I canary pitches with the curveball and

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the slider to swing and miss pitches. So I understand

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>why people like Nick Pavetta. Last year, I got a

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a John Gray vibe from him, And

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I know he doesn't pitch in corps Field, but it

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was like every like all year long, people were freaking

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>out about Pavetta, like how good he should be, But

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it never really came to fruition. He's still young enough

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where like it could happen, like he could easily break

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>out this Year's only twenty six years old, so he

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>could take that next step where it actually comes to fruition.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But last year, you remember this Greig, A lot of

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>people were just talking about him all year long, like

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>how good he should be, like all the underlying numbers.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He gave me a little bit of a John Gray Field.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't pitch in a good hitter's ballpark in the uh

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in Citizens Bank Park with the Phillies. Pretty tough division

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>now to like outside of the Marlins he's gonna face

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals lineup, he's gonna face the Mets lineup, he's

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna face the Brains lineup. Pretty tough lineups there too.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So I like Pavetta. I could see why you know

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a breakout candidate. Definitely. I think I've tempered expectations

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than other people, though. Yeah, I

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be people that are higher than me

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>than Nick pavetda, Like in the leagues that we're doing

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the g S T A D nine days away now, Um,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>people are just gonna be higher on this guy than

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we are. Like, I know, people in an auction, they're

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna bid more than we care for. Like I like

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetta, Like I could see why there's a chance

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>that he breaks out, Like you also see why he

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>may not. Like the good news is there's a good

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>chance he could pitch around a hundred and eight hundred

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>nine innings like that. That's awesome. Um, how do you

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>think how do you think Nick Pavetta goes for in

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>an auction? Fifteen teams? I have no I have no

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>concept of this at this moment. I'm just I'm thinking of,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like how much we paid for like last year, for example,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>we got alex Would for like seven eight bucks, so

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Povetto would this year. It's kind of

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like in the range where alex Wood was last My

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>first instinct was like nine, Yeah, that was my first

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks something like that, which you probably want them

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>as like your SP four four yea spen ten dollars

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>on them in a fifte team. You know what's really

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we will said four pretty immediately there, Nick Pavetta,

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>right right, yes, before yea, what have I said? And

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of drafts where Moredcae has done

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>he gets paved, he gets him as is four. But

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing about this, and what's kind of almost

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>confirming my beliefs if I would have said, okay, the

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>two hype guys, Nick Pavetta, we both said five s befour,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I give you Shane Bieber to me SP three.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that. It's true. Yeah, I just kind

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of I think there's a little bit more trust in

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Bieber for me. I don't know, but I have it.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But I have it also, and I'm like, I'm okay

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with Shane Bieber is organizational organizational philosophy, right, maybe, but

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the other you've done such a good job. The Cleveland

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Indians know we've vision a pitchin too. We've hardly on

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this all three days this week, to be fair, or

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>two days this weeks only Tuesday. Jesus um. But I

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>look at I look at Shane Bieber, and maybe it's

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because I looked at him more closely than I did

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavett last year. Maybe it's because he had a

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>better year than Nick Pavetta did last year, and there

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is more trust there, and I think it's warranted. Reminder,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>same people had a four point five five year last year.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>These guys are pretty similar, Like spot on, it felt

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're drafting Bieber because his underlying numbers were way better, awesome,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like his ear, like his exfit was three point three.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Another guy was better than another guy that you keep

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>giving out in this range is EDWARDA. Rodriguez, who people

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>have loved for a while now, and I've taken shots

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at WARDA. Rodriguez multiple times in the past. Gloria will

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>never let you live down that last year at GST,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>when he wanted to draft him, you scoffed at it.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>How did you scoffed at Edward because I'm not let

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you live that down. The problem at Wardo Rodriguez is

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I felt, I just feel like he's never healthy. I

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's always one bad turn away from reinjuring

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that knee. I don't feel safe at all. Um that

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Reguez and again in a Rodo league it made more sense.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And I screwed that up in gd D. There's no

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. But I scoffed. But I scoffed. I

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I wasn't. Really I'm not gonna let you sit

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>here and take all in the head. That's fine, but

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that blame because I know I did it

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the head to head format. It's like, I don

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know what these numbers safe for Last year they were awesome,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But don't you feel like he's still kind of has

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to break out and there's some trepidation that he won't

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like and whatever is in this mixed with Beaver, in

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this mixed with Proveta, you're higher on him than than

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I am traditionally. Um, what do you think about him

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this year? Yeah? I mean this was another picture from

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>last year that made a conscious change. I mean, he

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>added a pitch he added a cutter. Last year, he

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>threw it nineteen percent at a time, So just just

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to put this in perspective, he threw a four seam

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>fastball twenty fifteen between fifty seven and sixty six percent

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Last year he cut that four seam

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>usage down from sixty one percent with the fourth seamer,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lowered that down to forty two percent. So lowered it

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>by nineteen percent, basically took that nineteen percent and added

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a new pitch, a cutter, which was lights out right.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, there's a lot to like with him again,

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's hitting the benchmarks that we want. Over eleven

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>strike it last year, over first pitch strike per today,

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>over oh swing and people to chase pitches. There's a

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>lot to like. If he stays healthy. You legitimately has

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, top thirty, top twenty five starting pitcher up.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Well here more about I want to run you gains

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>other guys in this area. When we come back daily

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>roado dot com learn from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections and now the Daily

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Roado dot Com optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>enough for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players join Daily roado dot com. The following

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener districution is advised. Is someone

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of should Roulette?

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>six six eight four nine six two one eight six

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>six four eight four nine six to one. That's eight

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>six six eight four ninety six twenty one Scout Fantasy

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports as a two straight seasons of twenty seven Holebron's

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>two straight years of eight. The RBI is on the

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>batting averages taken hit over the last couple of years,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>so you were expecting pretty good numbers from him, especially

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of the speedsters in front of him,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>King Kansas Cy. They were gonna be aggressive on the

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 1>big Beast Pas President. I've had a lot of rb

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I opportunities, so one of the more safer catchers, and

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>now he is off the board. Definitely a big hit.

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And for those that already drafted, that's just her week

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>days to the four pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Network and on your popular podcast providers. We're back here

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample, Greg Susman hanging out with you. Done. The

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>richest owner in fessial sports is right. Richest owner, Ah,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you. Number two is Dietrich match it's the

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Reds Bulls owner eighteen point nine billion. The how about

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars guy shot Con Now? Is he up there?

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not. The I only have the top five and

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in front of its top five, so three or two

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of were soccer. That's the second and fifth is should

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I be able to do? I know this person and

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he's very hard with you. You know, I don't really

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>know anyone. What if said someone that kind of has

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like a background, like I know he passed away, but

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like Paul Allen like, so that's the absolute right mindset.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You're right there, the one who has like that background.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You are right there. You could not be any closer. Oh,

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Bomber number one there, it is excellent job, Steve Bomber,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>number one. He's worth forty one billion dollars. That's a

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than us Panthers new owner worth. How much? Um,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>David Tempers number four on this list? Who's that the

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>new Panthers owner, Carolina Panthers? Um? Yeah, I thought I

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>thought Bomber was gettable for you, and he was all

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>right you were before you at the break you were

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about Eduardo Rodriguez and what makes him been triguing

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this year? Look, he just he checks a lot of

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the boxes, right, I mean the k per nine over ten.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The walks have always been an issue. But if he

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>continues to up that first pitch strike percentage and get

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of counts, I could see the walks coming back

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. That's really that's the next step for him, right,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's not outrageous to expect someone to take that step.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wheeler did it last year. I mean Zach Wheeler

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was always a guy that was over three walks per nine.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>He goes to two point seven walks per nine last year. Now,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if Edward Rodriguez can get it down to that level

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just have that many less people on

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>base via the walk and he's still getting as many

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>strikes as he is, I think he could be a

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sub you know, three seven, sub three six e R

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>eight kind of guy, and you know he's gonna get

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>run support. Pitching with the Red Sox. He hasn't been

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>able to stay healthy. I mean that's been a huge

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>issue for ed Ward Rodriguez. He's had the knee issues

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that that Greg reference. He hasn't gotten more than a

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty seven and a third endings pitch in

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>any season yet at the major league level. But you're

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>just you're not healthy until you're healthy, right, like the

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one year that you're healthy. If he goes on a

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty sixty getting pitch Greg and he you know,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>does similar to what he did last year, lowers that

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>e R a a little bit. He's easily a top

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty starting pitcher and he has the upside to be

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>even better, you could be a top twenty guy. Yeah,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the the upside is absolutely there. You get to the

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>advantatistics there, the underlying the numbers and much with Paveta

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and Biver like it's here now, he walks more. To

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be fair, the fan graphs projections have him between a

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty six and a hundred fifty one innings,

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so not great, no, but the one that might be realistic,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like one forty maybe maximum fifty is probably a realistic projection.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>D Ward Rodriguez, he shows us otherwise he walks more,

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than the other guys, right, definitely more

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>than Pavetta, definitely more than Beaver. I mean, you know,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Bieber is a control artist, so that's kind of an issue, right,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>rod Rodriguez with the control he also strikes out more,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not more than, not more than, but Bieber was he's

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>below ten case he is, right, So he's think Patta

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is like around this range. Yeah, I just looked at

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an exact thing. Um, so I think that's why.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's why it's close. Like I think

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're in the area together around Pitcher thirty

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Giver kikes to with the with the influx of this

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>cutter that he introduced last year, he limited hard contact

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>seven excellent, especially pitching in the A at least that's

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>what you want. That's excellent. How does Edward with a

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez compare to two of his teammates, Nate Evaldi and

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Rick Porcella. I have Porcello a little bit lower. He's

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy that wins a lot of games because he

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>goes deep into games and obviously gets to run skill. Yeah,

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's a good whip pitcher. Two because he's controlling.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't he doesn't walk a lot of guys, and

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go deep into games. So you know, Porcello

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was a good guy. I'm gonna mention to to pair

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with some of the type of guy. Yeah, yeah, that's

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna like help out your whip. He's gonna help get

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you wins, and he's gonna give you two any pitch

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and just based on that volume, he's gonna give you

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy strikeouts ish. So he's a good

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>guy to pair with some of these starry pitchers who

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are only you know, you're only expecting a hundred sixty innings.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You need to get these guys who are gonna give

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you anys. And I do think that Porcelo has a

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>place in fantasy. He's not really a target of mine

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>until maybe I take a few of these guys and

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:11.959
<v Speaker 1>then I realized, all right, I have to get some anys. Now,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think jose Can Tan is kind of in that

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>mix two. So it's literally was gonna ask you who

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like Josecan Tan because I'm really buying into that, that

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that change that he made over his final twelve starts

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>where his e r A was three point six and

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout rate was around I'm buying into that change

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>from jose Katana for the Red Sox, you brought up

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Porcello and who was the other one? I like a

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Valdi a lot as well. I will say this just

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>raw stuff. I think Edwardo Rodriguez is much better than Valdi.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I have Edward Rovadrigez one spot higher than Valdi.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I have Eduardo at thirty five. I have Nathan Valdi

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>at thirty six. But I like Valdi as well, because

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about someone who made a change. Look,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, we've been beating the drum for

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Valdi, We've wanted this to happen. He's always been

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a thrower. He needed to learn how to pitch. The

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox kind of got that out of him last year.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was the guy who added a new

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>pitch as well. Right, he starts throwing this cutter. I mean,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be again this is an organizational thing

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Boston Red Sox. You see, you see a

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>guy like EDWARDO Rodriguez at the cutter. Nathan Valdi did

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. I mean he started throwing a cutter

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent of the time last year. The last

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>time we saw him pitch before this was seen where

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he started to work this in a little bit. Seven

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time he threw a cutter back in

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>before that he never used it. Last year thirty two

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>percent cutter. And it's a really good cutter. Greg, it's

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a cutter. So you're giving me a guy who throws

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>with his four team fastball, which was always really straight,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but now he throws so hard that when he throws

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the cutter, hitters don't have enough time to decide whether

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or not it's a four team or a cutter. And

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>then you get that little late action that's throwing people off.

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So he made a conscious change. He added a pitch

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and he pitched much better. We all saw what he

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>did in the postseason, especially against the Yankees and down

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the stretch against teams in the Al East. He was

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a good picture. He was a really good picture. We've

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>been we've been trying to get this out of Valdi

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while now. He needed to learn how to pitch.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He pitched to a three point eight one ear a

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>last year and a hundred and eleven innings. So again

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>another guy would I don't know what the ennis are

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna look like this here we get a hundred and fifty.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a safe projection for a Valdi. But

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>his ex fit was three point six seven last year. Again, Greg,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>this is another guy like I don't think he has

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout upside. He was right around eight case per nine.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he could push nine case per nine this year,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but the walks were under two walks per nine one point.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>He made huge, huge strides last year. I know a

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are just gonna see of all these names,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna think well of Aldi. We've always been sold

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on a Valdi and we're tired of it. We're not

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>buying in. It's time to buy in on a Valdi.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And I've been drafting him everywhere to this point and

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>getting him as like my SP four, sometimes my SP five,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because I am buying in on this hut cutter that

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he's added, and the fact that he has improved his

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>command and that the underlying numbers mean even the real

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers weren't bad. Last year three point eight one e

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>r A with a one point one three with in

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eleven innings very good. Valdi was great

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, And a lot of what we heard ultimately

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>actually was about that cutter that you just spoke so

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>highly of. It was the fact that heat for years,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as Frank mentioned, perfectly, just throw the ball too straight,

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like you could throw a hundred miles hour. We saw

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it here in New York. It was just right down

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the middle. And hitters who are professionals catch up to

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it that you can throw a hundred miles power, but

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's not moving anything. With Luis Caste, if you

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>don't develop that third pitch, and you know it's like, hey,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's either slider or fastball, and you guess right, on

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the fastball. It doesn't matter how fast it is. These

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are major league professional hitters. So and I'm looking at

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the arsenal here for Valdi, of the time he throws

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a four seam or that's ninety seven miles power. He

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>also has a slider he throws twelve percent of the

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>time eighty seven miles power. He has a thirty two

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time he's using a cutter which is

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety three miles power. And he has a split finger

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>which he threw u thirteen percent of the time at

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight miles prowder. He has a legitimate four pitch

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>arsenal of pitches that he throws at least twelve percent

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of the time, four different pitches. Of all the is

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>learning how to pitch, which is what we've been better

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>lay than ever for a long long time. I know

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it pains me to say, it's basically like the Red

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Sox edition of the show. They have a lot of

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting starting pitches starting pitchers right now. So at where

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez fell into this hype guy category of Nimick Pavetta

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and Shane Beaver, there was another one that was brought

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>up the first show we or Frankston. I was on vacation.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The first show that Frankie did with Matt Modica, he

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>talks about a hype guy, and as a couple of

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>years late, that was Joe Musgrove and Joe Musgrove. Here

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Musgrove of now the Pittsburgh Pirates is a

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>hype guy this year, where do you have Joe Musgrove

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>compared to some of the names that we're talking about,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think about him? Yeah, he's right

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in this range. Right, So I have a foursome here

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of Eduardo Rodriguez, Nathan of Aaldi, Nick Pavetta, and Joe

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>muscro from thirty four to thirty seven, and I just

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>want to try and grab as many of these guys.

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember last year, Greg, something that I've been talking to

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you about I think off there. I don't know if

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we've done it much on the air yet, was last

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>year we said outside the top thirty starting pitchers, you

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>really just want to load up on as many of

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>these arms as you could possibly get because they have

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of upside. And the names that we were

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>referencing this time last year were Blake Snell. That was

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>mostly Michael Florio I was talking a lot, and we've

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this, Patrick Corbin a lot this time last year,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Tyne a lot this time last year. Jack Flaherty

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>came on late during the spring. I think Clevinger was

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>even a guy that we were talking about a little

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bit outside the top forty. Those are like really the

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>five guys that we were talking about a lot, and

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>they made that inside the top twenty. So again like

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>these are the skills that we're looking at from these

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers are all legitimate. It's just can they give

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you endings this year? Can they take that next step?

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what we're hoping for, and that's

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>why you try and grab as many of them as

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can. You know, I've mentioned the arsenal with

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Valdi where he can throw four different pitches. That's

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I'm looking at here. With Joe Musgrove, greg

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his first year with the Pittsburgh Pirates getting

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to work with race series, we've seen stride from him.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year. Um he threw five different pitches at least

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent at the time. He had a four steamer

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent of the time, a cutter fifteen percent,

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the time, a sinker seventeen percent, change up fourteen

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>percent at the time, and a slider, yes, three different

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>iterations of a fastball. He had a swinging strike rate

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>over eleven percent. That's what we've been talking about with

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys, Right and so Edwardo Rodriguez

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>has a swinging strike rate of eleven percent and he

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has a k per nine over ten Right, Greg, Last

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>year Joe Musgrove had a swinging strike rate over eleven

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>percent and a first pitched strike percentage six percent, So

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he's getting ahead of the count. We know Joe musgrob

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has good control. He's always had great control. He has

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a chase rate of around thirty six percent. These numbers

0:30:59.920 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are better than some of the guys that we've talked

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about to this point. Greg, Yet his caper nine was

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>only seven point eight. So that's how to me, he's

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>got to learn how to finish off batters. I think

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's like a big thing for him. It's not these

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>things aren't always just black and white. It's like, oh,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you you have a high screening strike rate, so your

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>kper nine should be better. Because there's a maturation process

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for starting pitchers. They need to learn how to finish

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>batters off at the major league level, So it's not

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily just black and white like, oh, you have a

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>high screening strike rate, the strikeouts are gonna come. But technically,

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if you learn how to pitch at the major league

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>level and sequence your pitches correctly, if you're getting the

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes, the strikeouts are going to come. So I

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>see this, you know, eleven point four swing strike rate

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Musgrove, and I'm thinking this caper nine is

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>closer to nine this year. And he always has great control,

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and he pitches in a pretty good ballpark in Pittsburgh,

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>tough division. He's gonna have to face some tough lineup

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure. The winds might be hard to come by

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh. But you at one point one whip last year.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>If he gives you a hundred and fifty endings of

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a you know, his his ffit was three point five nine,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>his exit was three point nine. If he gives you

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a three point eight zero e r A with nearly

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>nine case per nine, a hundred and fifty innings pitched

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>with a one point to zero whip, he's a top

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty starting pitcher. Pitches. I think my guests for a

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys, I think Pttic could go more

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because he threw more innings than a lot of these

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>guys last year. I think Provettic could be like one eighty.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's where a lot of people like him. I

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>think Ford, Water, Rodriguez, Valdi and must grow. Specifically, if

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you could get a hundred and fifty out of them,

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe must grow a hundred sixty. I think you feel

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>really good about that. And he that's a fair projection, man,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But you don't look at the fan grass projections. I

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have him between very high to make big Joe. He's

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a big guy. He's there. I think it's more than

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>than last year. He's never come close to that in

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>his major league He also he also pitched. Let's not

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>forget this hold on great he had seventeen and two

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>thirds and he pitched in the minors last year, so

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you add that on to his total. He was he

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was at one two, one thirty two. He can't jump

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>up to one sixty theoretically, sure, he was at one

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty two last year. I think that's I mean, it's

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.719
<v Speaker 1>fair jump up to one sixty. And what are these

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>guys right just because I have them ranked as top

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty five starting pitchers, that's not where they're going. I

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like these guys, and you don't have to draft him

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like right around where some of these others. But you

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to draft him around where David Price is going.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else is gonna jump on David Price. That's fine.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You let those people jump on David Price. You get.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You get your two starting pitchers inside your you know

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your top fifteen ranks starting pitchers, however you have it ranked.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you grab another like a Chris Archer, you get

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your top thirty guy. That's what I've been doing. Either

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Archer to knock a lot of times against my third

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher, and then just grab as many of these

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>guys as you possibly can. It's exactly what we said

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 1>last year and worked out. I think it's gonna work

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>out again. Grab Valdi, Edward Rodriguez, Pavetta, Shane Bieber, Luis Castillo, Joe.

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Must grove as many of those guys as you possibly can.

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And then when you take two or three of those

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>guys and you gotta round it out, you need some endings.

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we work. Back in, you work back

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in Rick Porcello, you work back in Jose Cantana because

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you needs some endings pitched. My Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, I have Walker Bueller, and I have James Paxson.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I have two of my top fifteen starting pitchers, and

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>then I have Chris Archer as my three. I got

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.479
<v Speaker 1>him in a tenth round. I took Valdi as my four,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and then, you know, ideally I would have wanted to

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>get more of these hype guys. But I mean, in

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a draft like this, it's like an experts draft, fifteen teams,

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>all these guys are gunning for the same starting pitchers.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I ended up getting as my five, So I would

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have wanted more than just Valdi, but that's just the

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>way it worked out. And I love my pitching staff.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot to have those guys. I

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have Rode don as my six. Do you like do

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you like cars redone this year? Think of Redonda's your six.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a little bit later on that's what

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the guys are talking about, but always I've always been

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a Rodana. Everyone see the thing that the redone is

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone everyone is ty Man. You know, he was like

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the first round pig get it. You're tantalized by what

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he can do. Redone's never been able to stay healthy ever,

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He's always been so last year was super weird, right

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>because he came back from like the big injury and

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the strikeoups just weren't there. But if you look at

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the sample size everything else he's done in his career,

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he was around a strike up for any kind of guy.

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think, will the real Carlos were

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on really please stand up? But I don't know, but

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>like last year, like maybe he just doesn't have anymore, right,

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's changed as a picture. Maybe he's changed in

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>order to stay healthy. I kind of give him the

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>benefits extra was over five. Last year. It was bad.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>He was bad, There's no doubt about it. I'm taking

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>everything that he did before and kind of hoping that

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he builds off and gets back to that. That's what

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping for. Maybe it's not fair for me to

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>do I'm kind of throwing out last year because he

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>came back from the injury. Maybe he was still kind

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of like pitching through some stuff. But we've seen the

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>talent before with Rodan specifically, it's sixteen right over. A

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>strikeout for any got the walks down to below three

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>walks per nine the xpit at three point eight nine.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we could get there with him, man, Like

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>if we get a sub four ear eight of Carl

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Shordon and a strikeout for any like, that's where the

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>upside lies. Like, I don't think he's ever gonna be

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a great whip picture because he walks a lot of guys. Look,

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>last year he was bad. I can't really defend last year,

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Like the swinging strikes were down, it wasn't any people

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to chase as much. Last year was bad with Carl Shordon.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he came back from the injury maybe a

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit too soon, maybe he was pitching through some stuff.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But what I saw the three years before that with him,

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>with the prospect pedigree that he has, I'm trusting that

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than what I saw last year. Okay,

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I I don't want to. I don't want to. I'm

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>always done bait. Not that he costs hell No, he doesn't.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't even have him ranks anywhere

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>close to this right, Like, we're gonna talk about a

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>whole group of guys that you could get at the

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>end of your draft that you should load up onto.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>And he's in that range for me like I have

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Carl Sordan, it's my seventy ninths are gonna just for likes.

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a few guys going in this range

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that I do want to be like. Alaska is in

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>another one in the same range that he has walk issues.

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He also gets a ton of strike when you come back.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>We hit all the red sox. Let's tell the angels,

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyler's guys and yourheny they're going around here. What a

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>striking thing. We'll tell you next. The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is hitting you from all angles with the best fantasy

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>sports and betting analysis. You can catch the latest programming

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>on so many platforms. There's no way you'll miss out

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on any of the award winning programming we pump out

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You can listen through the f t

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>s Y Radio app, Iiheart Radio, tune in Radio, Stitcher,

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Audio Boom,

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch select programming on the fan t

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network your only

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>source for fantasy sports and wagering anytime and anywhere. Marie

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Sale two thousand and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen Europe,

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>being Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen World number one.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I keep my game face on me all

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, especially coming out with the bucker, leaving the

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>range or even leaving the poors. What's your story? Go

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to game face grooming dot com from all your athletic

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>facial wipes and body cleansing needs, brains make it rain.

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we take the Steph Curries of the world

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>way too much. For granted, we focus so much on

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the train wrecks in the sports world. We forget step

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of Curry represents what the game should be. We sometimes

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>don't pay enough attention to guys like Steph Curry and

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what he is doing for the game, win or lose.

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>He's still having fun playing basketball, and I think a

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys lose sight of that week day

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>six and nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast providers can't get enough fantasy football.

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Road to Experts has launched their NFL Fantasy Football package,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>which includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>available anywhere on the Internet, and Davids Madig and the

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Rhoto Experts are providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball,

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and NFL Draft content every day of the year to

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>give you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>football you play. Say temper cent at roto Experts dot

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>com with the promo code V and T s Y.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the NFL three Fantasy football package only at Rhoto

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot Com. Joined the Experts live on the air

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>every day by calling in at April fourth at six

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>seven nine to join the Fantasy Sports Network. It says

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you plus calcul us, it says you plus Eagles us

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever right here, Like what is going on? It's like

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>love making music and then it turned into some like

0:39:54.560 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Parity boy dand song that Greg knows. Oh babe, I

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>love that. We just have like songs and everybody in

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the world hates except for us. He who's that girl?

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can leave Greg. I can just you

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>just do karaoke karaoke tuesdays with Greg. Susan, that's not

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>fun for any about it, all right, I said, going

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the break some feedback in the chat, no singing, Susman,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I get a lot. I've noticed. Have you seen that

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>as well, yes, I have for about two years now.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Swing for the fences this daily Fantasy Baseball season with

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com. You're playing MLBDFS on DraftKings or

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Fandel Daily Rhodo will hope you hit your first home run.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>As the twenty nine MLB Daily Rodo Premium packages now

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>live a lot of alerts and weather updates. They gotta

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be covered Fantasy projections, yep. Covered a lot of optimizers

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to compete with the pros. Oh yeah, you're covered there too.

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Save temper cent on winning MLB DFS advice with earlier

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and specially using the promo code f n t s Y.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>That's MLB Daily Rhodo Premium package a Daily Rotor dot Com.

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code fn t s why and get

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>your temper cent off. Really bird, just count to day.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>It's Daily road Or dot Com. The promo code is

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>n t s Y. All right, Frankie, Right? Can I

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>sit out the first hour of the first segment of

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>our two No? All right, I really want to watch

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Archer pa. I have to get some updates somewhere to

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>watch spring training Chris Archer. I have a lot of

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer shares and why you're asking to sit out

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 1>your own radio show, your own podcast, your own video program.

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>One segment you could sing for a whole segment if

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you want to sit out for the first hour here,

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not the first hour, the first segment. I'm going to

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ask to sit out a segment, not two weeks. Is

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it okay? Where March Madness is gonna be on? I'm

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be focused. Well, you can just watch it on

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>your computer and just throw a bunch of stuff my way,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>oh to me like you're gonna do with Chris Archer,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and about twenty minutes from now, maybe right see how

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>much attention I'll be paying? I will, I got you

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or don't. I'm not worried. I believe me. I'm not worried.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Ventre's coming up. He's got like

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a throat thing going all right, getting blasted by snowstorms

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five degrees outside. I walked into and like, Chris,

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how you feeling? He kind of just like stared at

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>me and like that he can't talk, So how's he

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? Radio? You know? Radio? That's fine? Um, we

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>never red SOX already we have some requests and rightfully

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so talking about the Angels. Someone funny the chat, didn't

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I know. On the homepage of MLB dot com, there's

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a video of the d back singing baby Shark. So

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I gotta watch this. Open the TABN watch it later.

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Potentially I will Tyler scags Andrew Heiny, you and you out.

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you rank them? So I have Andrew Heeney.

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Andrew Heeney, but he's dealing with something. He's

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>dealing He's dealing with something, you know, for dropping everyone

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>else down the draft board because because they're dealing with

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>spring training injuries, it would be pretty hypocritical to not

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do the same with Andrew Heeny. So you do with

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an elbow. It's not just something, it's an elbow, so

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty legit. If he were healthy, I think he

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>would be quite firmly right in the mix with all

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>these other guys. I had to drop him down a

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I have him down at SP forty, so

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he's like three four spots behind these guys. But um,

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I still do like Andrewhiny. Like a lot of the

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>names that we've mentioned today, he's had a hard time

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>staying healthy. Last year he did he was healthy for

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ad and eighty innings pitch, you know, a strikeout per

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Enning kept the walks down. Um, he had a four

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>point one five ear A, but his X fit was

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>three point six eight, So he was much better than

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually what he showed at one zero whip. I mean

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was fine. Like I remember, right owned Andrewhini.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I picked him up in a lot of lease. I

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was drafting him with like a few of my last

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>round picks last year around this time, uh mere twelve

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>percent swinging strike er at sixty five first pitched strikes,

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>so getting ahead of the counts, getting people to chase

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent of the time. I mean, there's really

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>not a lot not to like about Andrewhini. You know,

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I like him, But you gotta monitor him now through

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the spring and see what's going on with the with

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this elbow injury. He's gonna he's throwing a bullpen session

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>today apparently we'll see how he comes comes out of that.

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think he has upsides similar to a

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the names here in this tier. But health.

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at least these other guys that we're talking about,

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>at least they're healthy right now. Andrewhini is not, so

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you gotta bump them down the board a

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit because of that. I didn't. I think that's reasonable,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the same people said for a Tyler's guys,

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>who also has battle a lot of talent. Again, if

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the age rotation, it's just a lot

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of guys that have talent. They just loader up on

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of pictures who have talent and maybe like

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>their bounceback candidates, like they have bags, they have Heeny,

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they have Trevor K. Hill, they have Matt Harvey. The

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Dark Night for Florio is excited about that out there

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast. But you know, they just have

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these guys who you don't know how

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>many anis are gonna go, but when they do pitch,

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they should be pretty good. And again the same thing

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>with Tyler Scaggs. I believe there was one game where

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he really got blown up where I think he gave up,

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like here we go against the Tampa Bay Race, he

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>gave up ten earned runs and against Oakland seven earned runs.

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>They were back to back starts where he just got

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>absolutely destroyed, absolutely shelled. Towards the end of the season,

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he came back from injury, like prematurely or

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Up until that point, he hadn't allowed

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>He had only allowed over three runs two times all

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>season up until January, so he was performing quite well.

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm gonna do this, Greig, I'll do

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>his game log through January. I'll tell you what his

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>ear a was, what his ear because he finished with

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the four point zero two ear a, but he just

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>got absolutely destroyed on two of his starts. Right so

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 1>through its first nineteen starts last year, this is Tyler

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Skaggs two point six to e r A three point

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>four seven x five. So that's probably closer to what

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you should expect. But at seven sent groundball rate nine

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>point four case per nine when the two point five

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>walks per nine. That was through July twenty last year.

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think he got hurt and he came back

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in August and he got bombed. He got bombed. To

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>put it honestly, in two starts back to back where

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you give up ten and runs and seven and runs.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Up until that point, he was great Tyler Skaggs. It's

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>never been a question about the talent. The talent is there,

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's how how healthy, can he stay. He's just another

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys. But I am a little bit

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>lower in my rankings because I mean he's like some

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of these other pictures at least like we've seen at

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>least like go the endings before t there's Skags. I mean,

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>he's never he's like the talent is there. So you

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just read some of the the game logs by a

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 1>month and whatnot, he said, hed have Skaggs at Skaggs

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>said he battled an injury, which is why he struggled,

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and he hit it from everybody and it was a

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.879
<v Speaker 1>week of weight lifting his first nineteen starts creep before

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt. Supposedly, Well, look like last year we

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>went a hundred and twenty five innings. That was a

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>career high. So I mean that's a lot of what

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about with the starting pitchers in this range,

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but I mean for him, it's even like more, it's

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>even more promptent. Five innings pitched and he's pitched like

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he's only gone over a hundred and he's pitched twice.

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's a little bit lower down my board, but

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think that he has similar skills some of

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys that we're talking about, but even less durability.

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you have a rank a blower above Haney?

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I have Heeny higher? How much I have heeny at

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>forty eight? Have Skags? I have he at forty Skags

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>forty eight? In this mix is Cole Hamiles between them

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Cole Hamile's Jay hab Tyler Glass. Now you say Cockuchie

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>rich Hill, and it's like like bum Garner and Faulty

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you do with those guys right now? And

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.919
<v Speaker 1>then I have Skeags and right behind him John Gray

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>another guy. So we had actually all the same guys

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.279
<v Speaker 1>in the range. One more name that I have here?

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh as you Darvish as well? I actually have little

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>High I have thirty third. I'm ahead of all these

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.439
<v Speaker 1>other guys. Just how come M like we're talking about

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>these guys and the kind of upside that they've had

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to get to you Darvish's level. We know what you,

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Darvish is upside can be. I mean, you just don't

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>like you. He's just like a huge mystery. To be honest,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't drafted him anywhere. I feel like I'd rather

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like where is he going? It's like he's going higher

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>than these guys. Actually he's going right around Pavetta. He's

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>going on Pavette six. Bieber is one Ford two. All right,

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean look like Edward Rodriguez is going a few

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>picks later. Like that's just how I'm looking at it, right,

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Like why I take the chance on dar Wish when

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I could get I could get uh EDWARDO. Rodriguez. A

0:48:57.800 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 1>few picks later, I get Evolve the A few picks later,

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I get must Grove way later, like Musgrove's going two

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>oh four. Darvis is going you know, I like, I

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't dislike Darvish because we know what he's upside. I

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mean he could be eleven gays per nine. Um, if

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>he goes on ch he could be like a three

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>five e r A. Like we know what you Darvis

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is town is. It's just last year he was dealing

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>with all of these injuries. His first spring training start

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>was I would say a disaster. Um. He had like

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>four walks. He didn't give up a hit, but he

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>like walked in a run. He struggled with command. His

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>second star was much better. It was much better. So

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I have him a little bit higher than these guys.

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you just ask me, like value wise, who

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.879
<v Speaker 1>would rather like I'd rather just wait around or two

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or three or four when it comes to must grove

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and takes some of these other pitchres. What about another

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>name that was in there, and I asked you about

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday he said he's actually climbing up a drab

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's you see Coucci of the Seattle marineris. And

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I've said this a lot on this show, and it's

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that these guys that come over from Japan, it takes

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the league a while to adjust to what they do.

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And traditionally, like the first time that he faces all

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>these exactly the first time around on the league, he

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 1>will just there's not enough. There's tape obviously from Japan,

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but like seeing in person is very very different. The

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>scouting is very very different. And I've said it in

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the past with a guy like Kenta Maeda, and it's

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>something about Massa Hero Tanaka as well. Both guys were

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing their first seasons and then the league catches up

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way right Like to me, I always want

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys because I think there is some

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>mystery crowding them. Now with Kakuchi, the Mariners have already

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>said we're going to be very careful and he's going

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to get extra days off. We're going to really spread

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>out his starts. And it's not he's not going to

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that they will even come close to

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 1>giving him two hundred innings, but specifically in a rotal

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.399
<v Speaker 1>league where theoretically you don't care about that. I think

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to like about Kuchi. Now, he's not

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you Darbisch master Hero's Knaka where he's coming over and

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, hey, this could be an ace. He's not

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that at all. He's more like a former mariners Ashi

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Wakuma in that three four type of starting pitcher range.

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, he could be a two or three okay,

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Hukuma was. Another guy, um Hiroki Kuroda

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.359
<v Speaker 1>was very successful throughout his major league career. I think

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Kuchi could be like an Iwakuma, like a Coroda, and

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of merit to drafting and

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where he's going around here. I agree. I don't know

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna own shares right because he's going right

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:24.760
<v Speaker 1>around the range as a lot of these other guys,

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just rather have those guys. If I'm being

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on it. Like you know, I'd rather having water Rodriguez

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and Baldi, and I'd rather have Musgrove even in a vacuum.

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And he's going, you know, forty picks after Cacucchi right now.

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So I like Cacuchi. I think, you know, I agree

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of what you said, especially if you've

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seen this guy pitch at all in in spring training.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he made Joey Votto look foolish, which is

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not something Joey Votto said it. He said he was

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing stuff. These are seen before. Yeah, and you know,

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>if you if you've seen there's a SloMo video the

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Mariners. The least of him this wind up. He

0:51:57.640 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>hides the ball really well. He also has like a

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>dutter in his delivery, which a lot of these pictures

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who come up from Japan absolutely and it destrows hitters

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 1>off right. So I do think that he can, uh,

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially early on the season, his first season,

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you have some legitimate value here. It's just

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I like these other guys going in his range a

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. He doesn't have overpowering stuff. He's like fastball,

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's the deception and the delivery. He has some

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>good breaking stuff as well. Uh. The FanGraph guys have

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>him for close to a strike up or ending, So

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. That's a pretty high praise. Their mariners

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have already come out and said, he's not gonna go

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, more than a hundred fifty hundred sixty n pitches.

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yere basically what we're talking about with the rest of

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys too. So I think this is a fair

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>range for him to be in. I just p for

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>some of these other guys that are also going in

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this range slightly ahead of him, which are the guys

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about. There are a couple of those

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 1>guys going, and he's available. I think it's a good

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>fallback option. There's one veteran that you just said that

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in this range that we haven't really

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about all the much, and that's Jay Hap of

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the New York Yankees, who maybe a better major league

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>picture at this point, that a fantasy picture, but he,

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the Eanches should get a bunch of wins. Uh.

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You said half in this range, creets, what more of

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a solid type of guy? What do you like when

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't like the Jay hat. Yeah, I think he

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>might fit more of like the Ennings Eater type of

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 1>uh mold of a starting pitcher for fantasy. And you know, look,

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's three of the past four years he's been a

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy two or more endings pitched. Last year

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it was very clearly an outlier, right, Like, the strikeouts

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:33.879
<v Speaker 1>went up to nine point seven eight strikeouts per nine,

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whereas in his career he's seven point nine eight. The

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years, you know, he's been around seven

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>round eight. You know, I think if he goes a

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy hundred seventy five endings, he's gonna come

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>close to giving you a strikeout per ending. Like I

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think he'll give you like a hundred sixty hundred seventy

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>U endings pitsched. I think, you know, the walks have

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>been solid the past couple of years. He's been, you know,

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one point one three whip last year one point three

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one in seventeen, not great, but then one point one

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>seven in ten. So at this range, it's kind of

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to find guys that are really gonna help you

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to whip all that much. And if if you get

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you a sub one point two zero whip. Um. I

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think you'd be happy with that. I think last year

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>was kind of an outlier season from him, but he's

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>always been good at limiting hard contact. The same was

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>true last year. He was around thirty point nine percent um.

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>The swinging strike rate was up last year ten point four. UM.

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know that I buy into the renaissance

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 1>all that much. Ah, but he's you know, look, he's

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>been a He's been under a four ear even under

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a three point six five ear a four years in

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a row. And that's pitching in the A, at least

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with Toronto. So he's very familiar with these teams. Is

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he undervalued? Did you happ undervalued? He might be. I

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>think this was looking at this now and I'm thinking,

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a three point six five ear a are

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>better for four years in a row. It's basically one.

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We want these other guys in this range to right.

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's older, and you know people you know

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>one year earlier rather than one year late, but he

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't really show signs of falling off last year. In fact,

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he got better. I was thirty six years old, the

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>strikeout got better. I don't know, that he got better.

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean the walk great went down. Um oh, he's

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 1>not much apparently was the year before. Value He's gonna

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>win a lot of games with the Yankees to seventeen

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>games last year. I think this I'm just looking at

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's not a sexy pick, you know, certainly not man,

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what I think? Actually have ja high. What

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:36.800
<v Speaker 1>means where like I'm gonna put him over Cole Hamills

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>put him over Andrew Heeney, definitely gonna put him. Okay,

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put over Jose Kansana like you always move

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>over Kazana because in Tanna over the final twelve starts,

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:51.399
<v Speaker 1>these numbers that could keep holding on too. He pitched

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with three for six percent strike out. Like that's what

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I want Jose Kantana to be for the entire season.

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what Jay had was last year. That's what

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he is every year. Why don't I just take the

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who has done it four years in a row

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and is gonna win a ton of games the Yankees.

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He's pitching a at least, he's very familiar with the division.

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He's pretty good against the Red Sox too, So like, yeah,

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're worry about the Red Sox, but maybe you don't

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 1>worry about it as much with a guy like Jay Hat.

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I just talked myself into that, move him up for

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>spots I haven't at thirty eight. Now, okay, you think

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. Where do you have on the numbers next

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to it? But like what I mean, like you have them.

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I had up a lot of these names, so I

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had him behind all the names that we've talked about,

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>every one of them. You're more inclined to move them

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 1>up now I am. Now I put him more in

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Kyle Hedrids, Madison bum Garner, you Darvish, who's the

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>town out here? And put they're all kind of seems

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like I'll put them all next to each other. So

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I like him. We figured these things out on the air.

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:46.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what this sport. There's one more veteran who is

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 1>right the way below these guys I wanted to bring.

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you like him at all. But Jake Arietta.

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Does he belong in this crew? Interesting? Interesting what we

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 1>saw of him in spring the other day. Very interesting.

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Wet'll talk about that, all right, We'll talk about Jake

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Arietta and we'll go even deeper on the other side,

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy best friends forever. Continue for hour too. Coming

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 1>up next m