WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Nathan Sheets & Ed Ludlow

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea. We had Damien sassaur In to give

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>us an incredibly detailed pro briefing on the dynamics of

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world em and everyone bouncing off

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>this news flow that we have, and then the magic

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of that is later on three or four guests later

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to have Nathan Sheets with us, the chief global economist

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>for City Group, taking the same bouncing off all this

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>news flow and trying to coalesce it into a global view.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was just great to have sasaur back

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>to back with Sheets. Here's Nathan Sheets on the reality

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>of a higher yield regime.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I certainly think we're in a place where a central

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 3>banks are feeling pressured to be less accommodative and more

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>restrictive than what we expected as the year began.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think the key driver there is that, on

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, this global economy continues to be quite

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>resilient y how we've worked down our able forecast by

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a few tents, but inflation is going to be higher.

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the hard of the matter. With the ambiguity of

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a high nominal excuse me, with a high nominal GDP

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and then what's the ambiguity. Do you get slow down

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>resilience do you get actual a pickup in a global

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>GDP here for that matter, for any other nation as well.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes for an incredibly uncertain dash to

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year and into twenty twenty seven.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And we'll just do the best we can with the conversation.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlow twenty four to seven. I love to bust

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>this chops about his three hour workday out in San Francisco,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and as you well know, that's beyond far from the truth.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>He's on the red Eye coming to sam coming to

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>New York here after the Apple meetings. Ad Ludlow on

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>technology and of course looking out to the weekends. News

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.399
<v Speaker 2>that Google got a memo from SpaceX.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Google is going to pay space Yeah, nine hundred and

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty five million dollars per month for compute. So there's

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 4>the immediate story. SpaceX is a company that launches rockets,

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 4>and on that rocket is some kind of payload for

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 4>a public or private sector customer. Then in the very

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>distance distant future it sells AI to enterprises. In the interim,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 4>everyone I speak to on the cat table is saying

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 4>they are playing a blinder by hedging their bets becoming

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 4>a hyperscaler selling computing capacity. There are big questions about

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 4>why don't they need their own, but yeah, this is

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 4>interesting timing, pre pricing of trade.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 2>My head is spinning. I'm trying to get smarter on

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this as we dashed for the week, and we're so

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>advantaged by our equity desk, by our debt desk, and

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of course all that's going on in technology there with

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlow on podcasts, it's a technology on Apple and

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Spotify on YouTube podcasts and single best idea