WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Jackson Hole, France Conference, Tokyo CPI

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program, we

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>look ahead to FED Chair Kevin Worsh's first address in

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Hall. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephen Caroln London. We're looking ahead to a key

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>meeting of French business leaders as they count down to

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the pivotal presidential election in France.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Chrisner, looking at how overall inflation in Japan

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 4>compares with price increases in Tokyo.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven three year, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Syrias,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app. Good day to you.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager, and we begin today's program with an

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>eye on the Grand Tetons. Central bankers from around the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>world are headed to Jackson Hole once again for the

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City Fed's annual Economic Policy Symposium. It is going

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>to be the first appearance for new FED Chairman Kevin Worsh,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>so there is heavy anticipation for what he has to

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>say at his keynote address later this week. Bloomberg International

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee is going to be

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 2>in Jackson Hole once again as part of our team

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>covering the event this year. But Mike is here with

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>me now in our Washington studio to preview what the

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>chairman might have to say, given that he's told market

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>participants that he doesn't want the FED saying as much.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 5>So what are we expecting, Well, we're expecting something, but

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 5>we're not exactly sure what. The title of this or

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>the subject of this symposium is payment systems, which would

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 5>attract a very small subset of the people out there

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 5>in the markets. So the original thought was because he

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 5>didn't want to say a thing, he might stick to

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 5>that subject. But now that he's had trouble with the

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 5>markets and the question of FED credibility, there is a

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 5>feeling he's going to want to say something that will

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 5>make him seem more credible, that will enable the markets

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 5>to take him more seriously when he says he's going

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 5>to make sure they get back to the two percent

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 5>inflation target. It's a bit of a threading the needle

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 5>because he doesn't want to do any kind of forward guidance.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 5>But if he emphasizes the FED maybe would use all

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 5>its tools in the event, that kind of speech that

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 5>might get some attention as well.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that the kind of thing that would be enough

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>for market participants just to say that the Fed is

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 2>willing to use all its tools when I think the

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>markets have kind of gotten used to the idea that

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the FED at least under pass chair and have been

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.839
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more specific about saying that they could

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and raise rates, lower rates, that sort of thing.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 5>That's the trade off Worsh is working on. He doesn't

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 5>want the markets to take their cues from the Fed.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 5>He wants the markets to take their cues from the

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>data and the news out there, and then the FED

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>would follow along. Basically, So how far can he go

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 5>and build credibility again without going farther than he wants

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 5>to and setting a precedent that then he'd have to

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>live up to going on with future guidance on what

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 5>they're going to do. Now, he does have some other

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 5>things he could talk about. He could certainly talk about

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 5>the task forces that he's put in place and what

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 5>he hopes to get out of them, and maybe in general,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>what he hopes to accomplish as a FED chairman who's

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 5>going to bring radical change, as he's put it to

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the Central Bank.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're not expecting then, that the Chairman is sort

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>of feverishly reworking his remarks given the action that we've

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 2>seen in the markets these last few days and weeks

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to rising bond yields.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 5>I think at this point he would be just still

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 5>writing it, because he told us on July twenty ninth

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 5>that he hadn't started writing it yet. So maybe it's

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 5>in the first draft or second draft stage. But no,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the problem here is the same thing, the same problem

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 5>we have all the time with this administration. In places,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 5>the news changes so quickly that trying to keep up

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 5>with it is very difficult. So I suspect that he

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 5>would be speaking more in general terms rather than in

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 5>specific terms. Now, we did have last week the Treasury

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Department announcing its plan to double the buybacks increased liquidity,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 5>basically to try to keep people able to buy treasuries.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 5>The yields obviously worrying the Treasury Secretary, and that could

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 5>have an impact on the Fed. It could mean that

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 5>the Fed wants to cut to raise rates on the

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 5>short end to build credibility, and that would then send

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 5>long yields lower. But that's something that's probably too specific

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 5>for him to get into because that would amount to

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 5>forward guidance.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>It raises an interesting point, given that the chairman has

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>said he doesn't want to give forward guidance to the

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>market necessarily, could he give a little bit more clarity

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to whether the Fed and the Treasury

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>are going to be working a little more closely together

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 2>going forward.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's an interesting possibility because he has said all

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 5>along before he was the chair and since he's been

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 5>chair that he wants to work on a so called

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Treasury Accord, an updated Treasury Accord, And the idea generally

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 5>is that the Fed would try to align its securities buying,

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 5>because it still is not new Q right now, but

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>it's still buying securities to keep up with the rise

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 5>and the money supply and demand for money, and so

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 5>align that with what Treasury is issuing. And right now

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Treasury is moving to shorten its maturities. They haven't done

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 5>anything besides the buybacks in terms of an announcement, but

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 5>markets are expecting one in a reasonable amount of time,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 5>and in that case, then he might make it more

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 5>clear that the Fed is much more interested in having

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 5>a portfolio structured towards the short end and towards bills,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 5>which would work together with Treasury.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for being at least a part of this

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>bit of the build up. Mike really appreciates you coming

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in with us. That's Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondent

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Michael McKee. We invite you to stay with us for

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>special coverage of Jackson Hall and Chairman Warsh's keynote on

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a special edition of Bloomberg Surveillance this Friday, nine am

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Time from Jackson Hall on Bloomberg Radio, Television

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and the Bloomberg Business App. Let's take a look now,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>add some stocks making news in the week ahead. I'm

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Hager, joined by Bloomberg Intelligence Global Head of Tech

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Research Mandeep Singh. Because we have some major tech earnings

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>coming up this week, including the big one from in Vidia.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Is in Nvidia still the big one man deep when

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the AI trade and earnings.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely. I mean, if there is you know, one company

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 6>that really has carried through the mantle when it comes

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 6>to this AI build out, it is in Nvidia, and

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 6>it shows up in their numbers when you look at

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, growth expectations of close to mid ninety percent

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 6>and actually their revenue seems to be accelerating. So it

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 6>just goes to show that, you know, this company with

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 6>over a three hundred and fifty billion dollars run rate

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 6>now is really executing very well and it is at

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 6>the front and center of this big AI infrastructure building.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible the run that Nvidia's had literally for years now,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and just now this latest announcement of a one hundred

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and five billion dollar data center investment in Ohio for

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Open AI, it just speaks to so much of the

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>outperformance that we've seen for in Vidia for quite some time.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And I guess the question still of you know, whether

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>circular investment is still an issue for this company? Is

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>it for you?

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 6>So, the thing that has changed with Nvidia now versus

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years back is it's got a really

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 6>strong balance sheet with a ton of cash to invest,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 6>and so what it is doing now is with these

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 6>big data center deals, it is helping you know, the

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 6>likes of open Ai and Tropic and other companies neo

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 6>clouds finance this build out where if they want to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 6>set up a data center and Vidia will be that

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 6>backstop and terms of filling in some of the investment

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 6>requirements and then helping these labs raise funding from private

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 6>capital and other sources. But in Ridia is really flexing

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 6>its balance sheet in terms of making sure there is

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 6>a robust ecosystem around it and all of them are

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 6>able to raise financing, because that's the hard thing now,

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 6>as these numbers get bigger and bigger, not every company

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 6>will be able to raise financing for one hundred billion

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 6>dollar data center. So that's where in Vidia comes in

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 6>and kind of helps and be that backstop. And Google

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 6>is doing the same thing, by the way, So all

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 6>these major players who are training the models are kind

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 6>of using their balance sheet in an effective way to

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 6>prop up the ecosystem around them.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we're definitely looking forward to those earnings results

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>from Nvidia on Wednesday. We're also going to hear from

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 2>CrowdStrike the cybersecurity firm. A lot of debate about this

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>pany's valuation heading into the print. How do you see it?

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 6>I would agree that they have been a beneficiary of,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 6>you know, the entropic Mythos release and all the kind

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 6>of anxiety around every company being at risk of a

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 6>cyber attack because Mythos exposed all the vulnerabilities. But to

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 6>my mind, CrowdStrike hasn't really shown that in their numbers.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 6>They're still growing top line at mid twenty percent, which

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 6>is healthy, but nothing like what you know we talked

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 6>about and Vidio growing at mid ninety percent, and you know,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 6>some of the other companies in the chip space are

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 6>growing triple digits. So mid twenty percent growth for a

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 6>company of CrowdStrike size doesn't seem that impressive. And it's

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 6>already trading at a very premium valuation multiple, So from

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 6>that perspective, the expectations are higher. But maybe they come

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 6>out and talk about, you know, how all the enterprises

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 6>have started increase using their cybersecurity spend Postmethos, and that

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 6>will be a good narrative. I think that may help

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 6>the stock sentiment.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And before we hear from crowdstriking, Nvidia on Tuesday, we're

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>going to get earnings from Marvel Technologies off the back

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of their announcement of a twelve point two billion dollar

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>share purchase deal with Google. What's that say about where

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Marvel is in the chip raise?

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, all these chip companies I think have really

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 6>benefited in a big way from you know, the CAPEX

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 6>increases that we keep hearing about, and Marvel is exposed

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 6>to all the custom silicon development and now they are

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 6>partnering with Google. Earlier they were predominantly working with Amazon.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 6>So the fact that Google is working with Broadcom and

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 6>now they are working with Marvel to expand their TPU

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 6>kind of unit chhipments suggests to me that, you know, Marvell,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 6>we'll see accelerating top line as well. And they have

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 6>more customers now and they had previously, and Google is

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 6>obviously a big customer. I was a little surprised with

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 6>the stock warrant aspect of this deal, like why they

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 6>had to give that, But we have seen that kind

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 6>of you know, deal with between AMD and Meta and

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 6>MD and open aiy, So it's not that unusual these

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 6>days to you know, give warrants if you have a

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 6>big customer lined up all.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, Man Deep, Thanks as always. That's Man Deep Saying,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Global head of Tech Research at Bloomberg Intelligence, and coming

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll look ahead to

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 2>a key meeting of French business leaders as they count

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>down to a pivotal presidential election. I'm Nathan Hager, and

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington. Later in

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the program, we'll look ahead to the latest reading on

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Tokyo inflation. But first minds in Europe are starting to

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 2>turn to the election cycle. In France, Emanuel mccrannt leaves

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>office next year after a decade in office, and many

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 2>are wondering what might come next. Bloomberg Daybreak Europe banker

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Carroll's been looking into one of France's biggest business conferences.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Franz's business leaders will be gathering at the home

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 3>of the Roland Garross tennis tournament in the coming days,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 3>with a very different kind of contest in mind. The

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 3>country's biggest business lobby group, MEDEF, is holding its annual

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>end of summer conference the last before next year's presidential election.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>This event has been traditionally a moment for potential candidates

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to rub shoulders with business leaders and prove their credentials

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to managing the economy and the challenges

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 3>there are major. Passing a budget in France has become

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 3>a hugely fraud affair politically, leading to the toppling of

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>two prime ministers in the last two years. Campaigning for

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the French presidential election will begin to pick up on

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the coming weeks as well. The outcome is being closely

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>watched across Europe and the consequences that it may have

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>in the wider European Union. Joining us now to discuss

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>is our powers correspondent Carolyn Connell and Rich Bravo, who

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>leads our team covering governments across Western Europe, who joins

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>us from Brussels. Carolyn, First of all, this is a

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 3>moment where French businesses get to lay out their priorities

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 3>for the next president. What are we expecting to hear

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>from them?

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, first, as you know, it's just getting back from

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 7>the summer rereg but clearly this is a bit different

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 7>because in eight months from now we have the French

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 7>presidential elections, so they're going to be on everyone's mind.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 7>The Prime Minister Sebastian Conny first needs to pass a

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 7>budget by the end of this year. That's going to

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 7>be difficult as well, is going to be present it

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 7>by the end of the months. And remember, as you

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 7>were mentioning, the past two budgets ended up with prime

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 7>ministers being ousted in votes of no confidence, so that's

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 7>a risk for executives over the next few months. The uncertainty,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 7>the volatility is going to come back. Some companies we've

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 7>been speaking with over the past few weeks and months,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 7>I've been saying they're either holding or delaying some of

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 7>their investments due to this uncertainty. And of course we'll

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.479
<v Speaker 7>wait to hear from the various programs of every candidates

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 7>and the potential new taxes on companies and businesses.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and indeed that's going to be difficult questions to answer. Now,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 3>as I mentioned, this is the moment where you guess

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>often potential candidates coming out and trying to prove themselves

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 3>to the great and good of the French business community

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>as well in terms of who's expected to be there.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to be a big political event.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 7>So in fact, if you look at this year's edition,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 7>there's not so many candidates that are going to be

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 7>physically there. I saw David Listener, the mayor of can

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 7>but he's basically at one one point five percent in

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 7>the polls, so very low. Also Fabrian Roussel, the head

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 7>of the Communist Party, who's preparing his candidacy. And then

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 7>of course we've got some members of the government but

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 7>not current a candidate. For examples, Curl the current finance

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 7>minister who has the big task of presenting this budget

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 7>by the end of the month. Saint Bruno Lamire, the

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 7>former finance minister Macon for seven years, who's actually going

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 7>to talk about political bravery. I thought that was an

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 7>interesting subject ahead of these elections.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, perhaps, and what a moment it's going to be rich.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to turn to you in Brussels next. This

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>is an event that really, as the European political season

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>picks back up, is going to be on everyone's minds.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 3>What is going to happen in France next year and

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 3>what it means for the European Union. How are politicians

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and officials in Brussels feeling about the end of Emmanuel

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Macron's term in office and the election well.

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 8>Officially, the European Commission will never weigh in on upcoming

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 8>elections or take a stance it appears to influence a

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 8>campaign or give any kind of preferential guidance. But obviously, France,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 8>being one of the core members of the EU, wields

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 8>outside influence on policy matters across the board, and a

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 8>la Penn presidency would obviously represent a massive change for

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 8>the EU and would likely upend the status quo as

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 8>we know it. Lapenn is an unrepentant eurosceptic. She likely

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't adhere to EU fiscal rules. She has said that

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 8>she would seek to send less money into the EU's

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 8>budget and would try to undo things like climate policy

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 8>and the current migration rules. But more importantly, she would

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 8>hold a veto in the European Council, meaning that she

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 8>could hold certain policy matters such as sanctions and trade hostage.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 8>This was a tactic utilized for years by Victor Orbon,

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 8>and he would withhold his support for something like sanctions

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 8>against Russia in exchange for some domestic policy matter that

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 8>was important to Hungary, and these two issues wouldn't be

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 8>related in any way, but he was able to users

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 8>to create great, great effectiveness.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 3>What's the French business view of Marian Dapan Caroline, given

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 3>that we're thinking about the party leading in the polls,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 3>and of course there's been so many questions over her

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>counters the up until now.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Marine Open and Jordan Bardela, who she said will

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 7>be her prime minister if she wents, clearly have been

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 7>leading in the polls. They are at around thirty thirty

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 7>five percent in the first round in most polls, and

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, given they perhaps have a big shot at

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 7>winning this election next year, executives have been increasingly courting

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 7>the party, meeting some of the national value advisors behind

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 7>closed doors, but not only We saw Bardela, for example,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 7>appearing publicly at the two hundred year party of Lufigaro

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 7>newspaper The mid f Business may Be actually organized a

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 7>dinner with Marin Open last spring in order to discuss priorities,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 7>perhaps a way for executives to also influence some of

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 7>the programs. And if you look at the French papers,

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 7>the executives who were there physically at this dinner, where

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 7>the likes of LVMH total A Corno Axa.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Angi so all the companies in France, this is.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 7>Not taboo anymore. You can meet with Marinupen, you can

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 7>meet with Jordan Bardella. Marinupen has actually recruited a millionaire

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 7>investment phone manager who's been advising her on debates and speeches.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 7>Even though, of course a lot of these meetings for

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 7>the executive their aim is to try and influence a program.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 7>We don't know much details yet about their economic program

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 7>because they haven't published their manifesto and.

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Rich in terms of how Brussels is preparing for the

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>potential of La pan presidency as well, I mean, can

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 3>they work with Marion Depen given that she has been

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 3>very critical of the EU in the past.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 8>The short answer is that the Commission doesn't really have

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 8>a choice. It just remains to be seen how antagonistic

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 8>this relationship will be. I mean, if you think back

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 8>to when Maloney first came down office, the expectation was

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 8>that she would be a disruptive force in Brussels and

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 8>push a really far right agenda that obviously never came

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 8>to pass. And now she's seen as a right wing

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 8>politician who isn't completely out of step with center right politicians.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 8>The big question is if Marine Leapenn wins, does she

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 8>try to emulate Maloney and work with the Brussels structure

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 8>or does she lean more toward the Orbon paradigm and

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 8>really try to disrupt things.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>We're talking a lot about mind the Penn because of

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 3>her position in the polls as well. But Caroline, what

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>do we know about the other candidates who are in

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the field. We don't have a full field yet. We

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 3>should say there's still a long way to go, but

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>this moment and I should remind actually in twenty sixteen,

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>it was during this conference that Emmanuel Macron resigned from

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 3>his position as Economy Minister and announced that he was

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 3>setting up his own political movement. So things do happen

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>at this time of year, but give us a sense

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>of where the field is at the moment.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 7>And I interviewed him at the time then he was

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 7>not even a candidate quite yet. I would say, at

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 7>the moment of the condidate who's got like be the

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 7>best shot at winning against either Marinupan or Jeanjean. The

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 7>far left candidate is Edwar Philipps. So this former Prime

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 7>minister under Macon during the COVID, during the Pandemic is

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 7>at fifteen twenty percent in the polls. Meloshan currently is

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 7>at around twelve fifteen percent depending on the posse, so

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 7>it's still tight. Meno Shan could possibly also make it

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 7>to a runoff, which obviously would be the scarier scenario

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 7>for the markets and for businesses to see a runoff

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 7>between both extremes, the far left and the far right.

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 7>But Edwar Philip maybe at the moment best positions. However,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 7>we've seen in pass elections a lot can change between

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 7>now and then. You've got Gabrielletal also in ambush, also

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 7>from the centrist party of Renaissance. You've got francois Land,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 7>the former president Socialist, who can actually possibly appear as

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 7>a reassuring figure for the center left. And then of

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 7>course you have these smaller candidates Brunootai from the Republican Party,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 7>who is also perhaps waiting to see if Edward Phillips

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 7>can really have this momentum over the next few months.

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>And just coming back a little bit more into the

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 3>immediate challenges, there's another budget coming up. We've mentioned how

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 3>difficult to day is to try and get a budget passed.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 3>How difficult are looking this time around for Sebastian Leconne,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the current Prime minister, it's.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 7>Exactly the same situation. The Parliament is fragmented into three blocks.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 7>I spoke with the Finance mister Ronaldis came back in

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 7>ex Provence at the beginning of July. He was saying,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 7>we'll bring the deficit back to five percent, which is

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 7>basically the same thing as last year. So it's really

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 7>not an ambitious plan. It's very unclear as well, exactly

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 7>how these candidates potential candidates are going to cut the

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 7>deficits over the next few years, are going to cut debt.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 7>And there is also I got to mention this little

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 7>music going on about if and once Sebastian McConnell has

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 7>indeed managed to pass a budget bay the end of

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 7>this year, whether he himself would potentially be a candidate.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I mean that would be a pretty good

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>momentum going into that as well, if he did manage

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 3>to do what so many others have failed to do.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>And we saw how difficult it was last year for

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Sebastian Leconano when we thought he was going to I mean,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 3>he did try to resign several times during that process.

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 3>As I recall, so a pretty bumpy path ahead rich

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 3>from a Brussels point of view. If the leaders are

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 3>looking ahead to that change, whoever it may be that

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 3>takes over from Emmanuel Macron next year, is there a

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 3>list of things that they want to try and get

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 3>done while Emmanuel Macron, who while not everyone may like him,

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 3>he's certainly someone that they know well in Brussels, is

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>there a to do list they want to try before

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 3>his term finishes.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, for sure. There are definitely parts of the EU

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 8>that are trying to take preventative measures now, given as

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned earlier, the strength of the national rally in

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 8>the early polls, which do show Marine Lapenn with a

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 8>strong position heading into the first round. In some circles

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 8>they refer this as the Penn proof the EU. The

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 8>biggest example will probably be the EU's trillion euro budget. Now,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 8>this budget needs to be re upped every seven years.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 8>The next iteration of the budget will will need to

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 8>be completed by next year. But a lot of people

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 8>in the EU, a lot of leaders, are trying to

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 8>get this done before the end of this year. And

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 8>one of the big assumptions is that they're doing this

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 8>to front run the French election because they just they

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 8>don't want to carry out those budget negotiations with a marine,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 8>potentially with marine lapenn.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that's going to present difficulties when it

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to those already extremely complex negotiations and the ambition

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 3>from the European Council President to try and bring that

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>seven year budget negotiation to a conclusion by the end

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of this year. This, as you say, Rich, adding another

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 3>sense of the urgency to that. Budgets here, budgets there,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 3>budgets everywhere. It sounds like I've got basicly a couple of

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>months ahead for all of us as we're thinking about

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 3>where the campaign goes from here. Thank you to you both,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>to Rich Bravo and Brussels, our European Government editor leading

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>our team covering governments across Western Europe, and to our

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Paris correspondent Carolyne Connaugh, who will be monitoring all of

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the developments in the French presidential election and we'll be

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 3>bringing you many of her interviews between now and the

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 3>vote next year, as well as, of course we're monitoring

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 3>in the coming days the events at the MEDAF Business

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>conference in Paris. I'm Stephen Carroll in London, You can

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe,

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 3>beginning at six am in London and one am on

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Nathan, Thanks Steven, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break Weekend,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll look ahead to some key economic data in Japan.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Nathan Hagar

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. We go to Japan next, where we'll get

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 2>the latest reading on Tokyo infleetion in the coming days.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 2>For a preview, here's Doug Krisner, host of the Bloomberg

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Nathan will get the August reading on inflation for the

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 4>city of Tokyo in the coming week. Now markets view

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Tokyo CPI as a leading indicator of what may be

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 4>seen nationally. For a closer look, I'm joined by Bloomberg's

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Brian Fowler. Brian covers North Asia economies and government, and

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 4>he joins from our studios in Tokyo. Thank you for

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 4>being here. I want to talk about the Tokyo CPI

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 4>reading for the month of August but maybe we can

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 4>begin the conversation by looking rearward to the retail inflation

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 4>data that we had for the month of July that

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 4>was released just a few days ago. Overall CPI up

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 4>at an annual rate of one point nine percent. Does

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 4>that mean inherently that the Bank of Japan is on

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 4>track for another hiken interest rates, at least in the

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 4>near term, Doug.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 9>I think it definitely puts us on track for an

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 9>interest rate hike, either in September or October. If you

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 9>look look at that headline number, it's just below the

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 9>boj's target, so you might think, okay, well, it's actually

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 9>just where they want it to be. But Governor Uato,

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 9>when he talks about policy, is going to cite underlying inflation,

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 9>the underlying trend, which is kind of an ambiguous concept

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 9>that gives them some wiggle room. And he can do

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 9>that because there have been a few factors that have

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 9>been distorting the data to the downside.

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 4>So we know that Japan is a big energy importer,

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 4>and I'm wondering about the extent to which higher energy

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 4>costs have been a big contributor to what's going on.

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, energy costs are definitely soaring. So we had some

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 9>trade data a few days back last week that showed

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 9>volumes of imports rising by a single digit number, while

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 9>as the energy imports were rising by huge percentage eighty

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 9>percent or so. It's definitely a factor, but the government

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 9>has taken steps to sort of mitigate that impact on

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 9>households and companies by rolling out a lot of steps

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 9>utility subsidies as well as tax cuts on gasoline.

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 4>So we have seen a lot of weakness in the

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Japanese currency lately, the intervention that was coordinated between the

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 4>US and Japan. Notwithstanding, where are we right now in

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>understanding the end's role and what the baj may do next.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so the weekend is definitely a factor. Uita will

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 9>probably try to avoid making a direct line. He'll often

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 9>say that policy does not aim at any specific currency rate.

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 9>At the same time, he will say that currency rates

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 9>are having a bigger impact on prices than in the past,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 9>and we know that authorities are concerned about the weekend. Obviously,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 9>the end fell to a forty year low in July

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 9>just ahead of that coordinated intervention we saw with the US.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 4>So obviously we have the Tokyo CPI reading and the

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 4>week ahead, And I'm wondering how inflation distributes across the

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 4>count tree and how ordinary people in Japan are regarding

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 4>higher prices right now. First of all, does it usually

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>follow the urban areas like Tokyo experience inflation in a

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 4>different way than other parts of the country.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 9>The reports can be very different depending on what the

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 9>governments are doing in order to kind of mitigate inflationary pressure.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 9>So we've seen in Tokyo, for example, the local government

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 9>rolling out subsidies for education, and that actually has had

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 9>a big factor on families. And that's not a nationwide thing.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 9>So we've had cases where the Tokyo CPI was rising

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 9>at a slower pace than the national trend, and we've

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 9>had to point out that nationwide is obviously the bigger

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 9>issue for the BOJ.

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 4>So we touched a moment ago on the impact of

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 4>higher energy cost I'm interested in food prices because there

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 4>is a version of the Japanese CPI that excludes fresh food.

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 4>It was up at an annual rate of one point

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 4>eight percent in July. What's going on with food prices

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 4>right now in Japan?

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 9>So food prices continue to rise, and yet the impact

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 9>on the index is actually to exert a drag. And

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 9>to unpack this, you got to understand that food prices

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 9>have been rising for quite a while, and last year

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 9>they were rising at an even bigger pace, faster pace

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 9>than this year. So, for example, we saw processed food

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 9>prices rise three percent in the latest month in the

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 9>national figures. By historical standards, that's a pretty fast pace,

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 9>but it's slower than the pace we saw in the

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 9>previous month, and it compares with an eight percent surge

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.959
<v Speaker 9>a year ago. So the food prices are actually pulling

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 9>the CPI lower, even though the pace of increase is

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 9>quite high for families.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 4>So what is the government of Prime Minister Takeiichi saying

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 4>about inflation right now and the degree to which the

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 4>government would essentially not be critical of any move that

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 4>the boj might make to type right now in the

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 4>near term.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 9>We feel pretty confident that the government is on board

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 9>with at least one more hike. Can we expect that

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 9>hike probably in September, but if not then certainly by October.

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 9>We think the government might not be keen to see

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 9>much after that. For Takaichi, inflation is kind of a

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 9>plus in the sense that it helps her work on

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 9>the debt to GDP ratio helps he gives her a

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit of fiscal flexibility. At the same time, it

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 9>also raises costs on households that compels the government to

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 9>roll out these costly steps to mitigate that impact, including

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 9>subsidies for utilities, but also the sales tax cut on

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 9>food purchases that she plans to roll out from April

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 9>next year.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 4>So take a step back last question before I let

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you go, and help me understand how well the Japanese

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 4>economy is performing.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 10>Overall.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 9>The Japanese economy is feeling pretty solid right now. We've

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 9>seen a slew of data that sort of support that idea.

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 9>The Boj's Hong Kong for the recent quarter performed to

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 9>the upside, and that of course measures corporate sentiment across

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 9>a lot of industries. We've seen industrial output doing pretty

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 9>well better than expected. The weekend obviously is a problem

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 9>for inflation, but it's definitely boosting exporters and giving them

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 9>better profits, and that allows them to continue raising wages.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 9>So the positive cycle doesn't seem that far off the

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 9>cycle of wage hikes feeding into domestic demand and demand

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 9>led price growth. So at this point, it looks like

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 9>take is doing the right thing from at least, you know,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 9>to the extent that we can see in the data.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Brian, we'll leave it there, Thank you so very much.

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Brian Fowler. He covers North Asian economies and government.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Joining from our studios in Tokyo, we go next to Australia,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 4>where mining giant BHP recently reported a full year underlying

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 4>profit above expectations, fuel in part by higher copper prices.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 4>We had the chance to speak with BHP CEO Brandon Craig.

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 4>He spoke with Bloomberg TV host Heidi Stroud Watts.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 11>So in a sense, this.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 10>Is kind of the easy earning season for you, right,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 10>not only are the numbers good, but this wasn't a

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 10>year where you were in charge. What's your view on

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 10>these numbers then?

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think for BHP it's been a fantastic set

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 11>of results if you actually have a look at the market.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 11>We've seen record copper production iron ore, which is another

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 11>very important commodity for us. There's been pretty resilient prices

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 11>as well, and then across the operations, we've delivered record

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 11>through put through Escondida, which is the world's largest copper

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 11>mine record productions from Olympic Dam, which is in Copper

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 11>South Australia right here in Australia. And of course in

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 11>the back of that really strong performance, coupled with the

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 11>strong prices, it's really allowed BHP to deliver what is

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 11>a stellar set of results. You can see the great

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 11>divide which has resulted from that. So overall we're feeling

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 11>pretty positive about where.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 6>We are right now looking forward.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 10>What's your strategy then, is it sort of continuity.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, there's a couple of things we really want to

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 11>focus on. The first being a mining company, safety is

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 11>always fundamentally important, so we will be investing heavily in

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 11>the safety of our workforce. But importantly, we also really

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 11>want to accelerate the productivity agenda in VHP. We have

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 11>an operating system in this company which is rarely supported.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 11>You're on your improvements and performance both on productivity but

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 11>also across cost. And on the back of that performance,

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 11>if we can couple technology with that, we believe we

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 11>can push out the productivity frontier for this business even further.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 11>And then when you have a look at the state

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 11>of the market in particular copper copper has huge demand

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 11>at the moment. It's rarely a core to the whole

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 11>digital revolution. We can see its core to the electrification

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 11>trends we see across the world, and that's a commodity

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 11>we really want to invest in. So accelerating a number

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 11>of very attractive growth projects to deliver that copper is

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 11>going to be very important for us. And then the

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 11>final piece is really this is a very long term company.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 11>We measure performance in decades, not years, so it's really

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 11>important that we also replenish that resource endowment we have

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 11>for the future generations that are going to come beyond us.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 10>I want to talk quite a bit about copper because

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 10>you say earlier you've just moved over from Chile, where

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 10>of course your core copper assets are. There is concern

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 10>from investors certainly that perhaps going forward that might be

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 10>a failure to fully capture that opportunity because of the

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 10>declining grades of copper from those assets. What's your strategy

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 10>for that.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, for large porphyry deposits, which es Gondida is one,

0:35:56.200 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 11>and that's dominant and Chile grade decline is entirely normal,

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 11>you have to continue to invest urine ur into these

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 11>assets to continue to grow the volumes. So when you

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 11>have a look at the plans we have underway currently

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 11>at Escondida, we're going to be building a new concentrator.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 11>That new concentrator will allow us to more than offset

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 11>the grade decline to be able to produce the copper

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 11>that the world is going to need. And that's important

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 11>because Escondida is the world's largest copper mine. You know,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 11>the world in some respects depends on the success of

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 11>that business, so it's important that we make those investments successful.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 11>But in addition to s Condida, we also have very

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 11>attractive projects in Argentina with a project called Vikunya to

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 11>the joint venture with Lundin Mining, and we also have

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 11>very attractive growth options right here in Australia through Olympic Dam.

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 11>So you put all of that together and we're going

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 11>to be able to put together a growth program over

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 11>the next five years that will lift our production in

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 11>cop of our fifty percent. And when you consider that

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 11>we are already the world's largest copper producer, adding fifty

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 11>percent to our production base over five years, that's pretty attractive.

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 10>You've already said that the bar for copper M and

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 10>A is going to be high. Are you restless for

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.959
<v Speaker 10>more assets or too focused on sort of execution versus

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 10>more ambition.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, when you look at the quality of the organic

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 11>pipeline we have in BHP, the copper intensity of our

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.479
<v Speaker 11>investments ranges between sixteen thousand dollars a ton and thirty

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 11>thousand dollars a ton. If you had to go and

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 11>try and put and buy a pure play miner on

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 11>the market today, together with a takeover premium, you'd have

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 11>to pay eighty five thousand dollars a ton plus a

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 11>takeover premium. So call it while over one hundred thousand

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 11>dollars a ton relative building our own copper for twenty

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 11>thousand dollars or thereabouts. So you're talking a factor of

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 11>five to one, which I think rarely showcases, while the

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 11>organic pathway we are choosing is is attractive to us.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 4>That was BHP CEO Brandon Craig speaking with Bloomberg TV

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 4>host Heidi Stroud Watts. I'm Doug Prisner. You can catch

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 4>us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 4>you get your podcast.

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Nathan, Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 2>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager. Stay with US. Top stories and global

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now.