Speaker 1: Coronavirus is not a major threat for the people in
Speaker 1: the United States, and this is not something the citizens
Speaker 1: should be worried about. Dr Faucci January. He later said
Speaker 1: the American people five days later, January, the American people
Speaker 1: should not be worried or frightened by coronavirus. This is
Speaker 1: a very very low risk to the United States. It
Speaker 1: isn't something the American public needs to worry about it
Speaker 1: be frightened about. Five days later, after found she says,
Speaker 1: no big deal. Trump issued a travel band on China.
Speaker 1: Five days later Today, Saturday, all weekend. Trump unprepared, people die,
Speaker 1: Trump lied, Trump, lazy, Trump, incompetent, Trump, not engaged, Trump
Speaker 1: slousy instincts Dr Faunci yesterday on CNN. If Trump had
Speaker 1: listened to our recommendations, we could have saved lives sooner. Wait, what,
Speaker 1: coronavirus not a major threat. It's not something that citizens
Speaker 1: would be worried about. Dr Faucci. American people should not
Speaker 1: be worried or frightened by. It's very very low risk.
Speaker 1: What ladies and gentlemen, I'm no quarrel with Dr Faucci's
Speaker 1: medical credentials, not going to even address him I'm not
Speaker 1: have no no problem with Dr Faucci and his qualifications
Speaker 1: as a doctor, his qualifications infectious disease specialist at the
Speaker 1: National Institute's for Health. But there is clearly a political
Speaker 1: effort under way that has been underway since prior to
Speaker 1: the election in November two thousand sixteen to destroy President Trump.
Speaker 1: It is an effort that continued after the election two
Speaker 1: thousand sixteen, and it can it had its own component
Speaker 1: during the transition, they tried to actually do things that
Speaker 1: would prevent Trump being inaugurated, would cause people to reexamine
Speaker 1: Trump's legitimacy. And then after Trump has inaugurated, the effort
Speaker 1: to get rid of him continued. And they all knew
Speaker 1: that everything they were using his evidence was bogus, and
Speaker 1: never have they all knew, every one of them knew.
Speaker 1: And what's happening today with the politicization of the economic
Speaker 1: shutdown relationship to coronavirus is a continuation of that. Much
Speaker 1: as many of you wish it weren't true and don't
Speaker 1: want to believe it, it is. So. We have no
Speaker 1: quarrel with Dr Faucci and his medical credentials. We have
Speaker 1: no quarrel with with Dr Faucci and his concern for
Speaker 1: his patients, but there are some things that he needs
Speaker 1: to explain. If the President of the United States is
Speaker 1: going to be the victim of a hit job in
Speaker 1: the New York Times on Saturday with a bogus charge
Speaker 1: that he was not prepared when he actually was the
Speaker 1: only one who was by shutting down travel from China Janu.
Speaker 1: It's it's just a public service to review some of
Speaker 1: the things that the person the media is going to
Speaker 1: as the singular authority on every aspect of this way
Speaker 1: beyond his medical credentials. You realize Dr Founci is being
Speaker 1: turned to as an expert on reopening He's being turned
Speaker 1: to as an expert on when it's coming back. He's
Speaker 1: turned to as the expert on reopening schools. He's the
Speaker 1: expert on how to operate restaurants when they reopened. Dr
Speaker 1: Founci is being turned to as the totally accountable and
Speaker 1: you can't question what he says expert on all of
Speaker 1: these things that have nothing to do with his medical qualifications.
Speaker 1: This is not right. It's grossly on there to President Trump.
Speaker 1: It's grossly unfair to all of us. So to review
Speaker 1: repetition is a primary ingredient to persuasion. Coronavirus is not
Speaker 1: a major threat for the people in the United States,
Speaker 1: and this is not something the citizens should be worried about.
Speaker 1: Dr Anthony Faucci, January one. Five days later, on a
Speaker 1: podcast with a New York grocery store magnate, John Katzi
Speaker 1: Metada he is a grocery store guy, writes nertly CATSI metatis, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think he is. January. American people should not be
Speaker 1: worried or frightened by this. It's a very very low
Speaker 1: risk for the United States. Dr Fauci five days later,
Speaker 1: after saying coronavirus not a major threat for the people,
Speaker 1: not something the citizens will be worried about, he said,
Speaker 1: it isn't something the American people need to worry about,
Speaker 1: it be frightened about. Dr Founci, what is the date?
Speaker 1: I have to search for the date. Well, the story
Speaker 1: is March nine. Then it's Forbes. Dr Founci. If you
Speaker 1: are a healthy young person, there's no reason if you
Speaker 1: want to go on a cruise ship, go on a
Speaker 1: cruise ship. Remember the Song of Princess or the virus
Speaker 1: Princes or whatever it's doctor or offshore in Japan. Everybody
Speaker 1: on it had the virus. When was that is? Doctor
Speaker 1: Founci had a story March ninth Forbes. If you're a
Speaker 1: healthy young person, there's no reason you want to go
Speaker 1: on a cruise ship. Going to cruise ship, Dr Foucci
Speaker 1: yesterday and CNN. If Trump had listened to our recommendations,
Speaker 1: we could have saved lives, Doctor Founci's recommendations. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: we're to ignore the coronavirus. Doctor Founci's recommendations, January one.
Speaker 1: It's not something the citizens should be worried about. It's
Speaker 1: not something citizens should be frightened by. Very very low risk.
Speaker 1: Here's audio sound by number six and our roster today,
Speaker 1: CNN State of the Union, Jake Tapper talking to Dr Faunci.
Speaker 1: So The New York Times reported in their bogus hit
Speaker 1: job yesterday that you and other top Trump officials wanted
Speaker 1: to recommend social and physical distancing guidelines to President Trump
Speaker 1: as far back as the third week of February. The
Speaker 1: administration didn't announce such guidelines until March sixteenth, almost a
Speaker 1: month later. Why we look at it from a pure
Speaker 1: health standpoint, we make a recommendation often the recommendation is taken.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's not, but it is what it is. We
Speaker 1: are we we are right now. Do you think lives
Speaker 1: could have been saved if social distancing, physical distancing, stay
Speaker 1: at home measures had started third week of February instead
Speaker 1: of mid March. Obviously you could logically say that if
Speaker 1: you had a process that was ongoing and you started
Speaker 1: mitigation earlier, you could have saved Obviously, no one is
Speaker 1: going to deny that. But there was a lot of
Speaker 1: pushback about shutting things down back then. Well, there was
Speaker 1: a lot of pushback. I wonder who Dr Fauci is
Speaker 1: referring to. It has to be Trump. So Dr Fauci
Speaker 1: says essentially in that by if Trumpets listen to our recommendations,
Speaker 1: we get save lives. Now, how does he get away
Speaker 1: with this politically? Not forget the health aspect of this,
Speaker 1: because nobody is here challenging whether he's a qualified doctor.
Speaker 1: But he gets to go on seeing and and basically
Speaker 1: not even be asked about his statements in January and
Speaker 1: February that the American people have nothing to worry about,
Speaker 1: that it's not a major threat. Why does he get away?
Speaker 1: Why is he not held accountable whoa rush. Not very
Speaker 1: many people heard doctor Foucci, So dude, I don't care.
Speaker 1: We can go back and tell everybody what he said
Speaker 1: and inform them. Dr Fauci five days later the American
Speaker 1: people should not be worried or frightened. The very very
Speaker 1: low risk not something the American people need to worry about.
Speaker 1: So that's January January, February nine piece saying if you
Speaker 1: want to go to cruise ship and you're young, do it.
Speaker 1: And he goes on CNN yesterday and says, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: if we've been listened to, if our mitigation suggestions have
Speaker 1: been listened to, yeah, additional lives would have been saved.
Speaker 1: But we got a lot of push. This is folks,
Speaker 1: this is outrageous. Here is audio SoundBite number seven see
Speaker 1: if something and this is this is against the same show.
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper talking at Dr Fauci, said, you'll think it
Speaker 1: will be safe in November for voters to physically go
Speaker 1: to vote at the polls. I hope, So, Jake, I
Speaker 1: can't guarantee it. If we have a good measured way
Speaker 1: of rolling into this steps towards normality that we hope
Speaker 1: by the time we get to November that will be
Speaker 1: able to do it in a way which is the
Speaker 1: standard way. However, and I don't want to be the
Speaker 1: pessimistic person. There is always the possibility as that as
Speaker 1: we get into next full and the beginning of early winter,
Speaker 1: that we could see a rebound. So uh, Dr Fauci,
Speaker 1: I can't guarantee the November election can proceed normally. Is
Speaker 1: the National Institute for Health in charge of federal elections?
Speaker 1: Is the director of the National Institute for Health in
Speaker 1: charge of any aspect of the American economy? Is the
Speaker 1: National Institutes for Health responsible for determining when schools can open? It? Well,
Speaker 1: maybe you might have asked the question that way, But
Speaker 1: should they be involved, should they be consulted? But when
Speaker 1: did the National Institute for Health become the source authority
Speaker 1: for the reopening various segments of our country? Dr Fauci quote,
Speaker 1: I can't guarantee the November election can perceive normally. I
Speaker 1: didn't know that the NIH guaranteed the integrity and the
Speaker 1: even occurrence the execution of presidential elections. I didn't know this.
Speaker 1: We have Dr Fauci and tape saying many of these
Speaker 1: quotes have attributed. Here's number eight January by number eight.
Speaker 1: January one, Doctor Founci on Newsmax the show called Greg
Speaker 1: Kelly Reports. He said that Dr Founci, bottom line, we
Speaker 1: don't have to worry about this coronavirus right. Obviously, it
Speaker 1: needs to take it seriously and do the kinds of
Speaker 1: things that the CDC and the Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 1: are doing. But this is not a major threat for
Speaker 1: the people in the United States, and this is not
Speaker 1: something that the citizens of the United States right now
Speaker 1: should be worried about. So you see, my friends, I
Speaker 1: waited for this. I sucked you in and many of
Speaker 1: you have been checking the email. You're making it up.
Speaker 1: Found you didn't say that. That's what you do, Limbay,
Speaker 1: you make it. I never make it up. There's Dr
Speaker 1: Fauci and his own words. You heard it. This is
Speaker 1: not something that the citizens of the U s right
Speaker 1: now should be worried about. This guy is being turned
Speaker 1: to for his stamp of approval on having the November
Speaker 1: election or opening your kids screwels. February nine, NBC's Weekend
Speaker 1: Today's Show co host Peter Alexander talking to the director
Speaker 1: of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director
Speaker 1: Dr Anthony Founci. Question, Dr Founci, Saturday morning in America.
Speaker 1: This February twenty nine. Now, Dr Founci, Saturday morning in America.
Speaker 1: People are waking up right now with real concerns about this.
Speaker 1: They want to go to malls and movies, maybe the gym.
Speaker 1: Should we be changing our habits? And if so? How
Speaker 1: right now? At this moment, there is no need to
Speaker 1: change anything that you're doing on a day by day
Speaker 1: basis right now. The risk is still low. Right, Okay,
Speaker 1: So back in February twenty nine, February, Dr Founci, Oh, no,
Speaker 1: no need to change anything you're doing on a day
Speaker 1: to day basis. The risk is still low. Can I
Speaker 1: have someund by number six? Again? This is Dr Founci
Speaker 1: yesterday CNN. Dr Founci. Administration didn't announce guidelines American people
Speaker 1: till March six. Why we look at it from a
Speaker 1: pure health standpoint. We make a recommendation. Often the recommendation
Speaker 1: is taken, sometimes it's not, but it is it is.
Speaker 1: We are we are right now? Do you think lives
Speaker 1: could have been saved if social distancing, physical distancing, stay
Speaker 1: at home measures had started Third week of February instead
Speaker 1: of mid March. Obviously you could logically say that if
Speaker 1: you had a process that was ongoing and you started
Speaker 1: mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives. Obviously, no one
Speaker 1: is going to deny that. But there was a lot
Speaker 1: of pushback about shutting things down back there, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's reference to Trump now, not to day Here up,
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper, do you think lives could have been saved
Speaker 1: if these measures had started the third week of February
Speaker 1: s to the mid March for oh yes, it's dr around. Well,
Speaker 1: February twenty nine is the fourth week of February, and
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper is asking Dr Fauci about the third week
Speaker 1: of February. Do you think lives could have been saved
Speaker 1: if social distancing had started third week of February? Out,
Speaker 1: No question about it, not many, Dr Foucy yesterday on
Speaker 1: February twenty nine, a week after the third week in February.
Speaker 1: And no right now at this moment, no need to
Speaker 1: change anything you're doing on a day. But why does
Speaker 1: doctor found she get to change, get to redo like
Speaker 1: the models. The models get to redo whatever they're putting
Speaker 1: out when they're wrong. They're never wrong. We just need
Speaker 1: a new day. Why does doctor Founci get numerous doovers?
Speaker 1: Why is Dr found She never held accountable to the
Speaker 1: things he says, and yet we get bogus hit pieces
Speaker 1: on the unpreparedness of Donald Trump, say New York Times.
Speaker 1: I'm mentioning all this. The only answer is because all
Speaker 1: of this is politicized, folks, and the target is Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: not the virus. These people are targeting Donald Trump. He
Speaker 1: is a bigger target to them than the virus. Du
Speaker 1: doubt me. I know it's hard to believe. Fauci's not alone.
Speaker 1: Don't misunderstand the Democrats, the media, the environmentalists, committed as
Speaker 1: a whole quadrety FBI, everybody involved in getting Trump on
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion, still involved in trying to get rid
Speaker 1: of Trump period. Look we just we have another one here.
Speaker 1: February seventeen, this year, USA Today, Top disease, official risk
Speaker 1: of coronavirus in USA miniscule, skip mask and wash hands.
Speaker 1: So this is not your found she the second week
Speaker 1: of February, third week of February. Nothing to worry about. Yesterday,
Speaker 1: Asked by Jake Tapper if we'd done things in the
Speaker 1: fourth week of February, conn have been safer. Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: could have been saber, but there was pushedback. Obviously found
Speaker 1: she wasn't you found she as recently as the third
Speaker 1: week of February thing and nothing to worry about here?
Speaker 1: How much pushback could there have been? How I mean
Speaker 1: it seriously, If in the third week, in the second
Speaker 1: week of February, and and the third and fourth weeks
Speaker 1: of January, if Dr Founci thinks there's nothing to worry about,
Speaker 1: then he's obviously not telling President Trump, you gotta do something, dude,
Speaker 1: you gotta get into year fast. And Trump couldn't have
Speaker 1: been pushing back. In fact, at that time Trump did
Speaker 1: the institute the travel ban from China. So what pushback
Speaker 1: would there have been? Because Dr Founci was not advocating
Speaker 1: for strong measures because he didn't think there was anything
Speaker 1: to worry about as recently as February. Look, I'm simply
Speaker 1: reviewing what Dr Fauci has said, putting it in a timeline,
Speaker 1: measuring it against the New York Times effort to say
Speaker 1: it's Trump that's unprepared, when Trump the only guy who
Speaker 1: did anything in January banning flights from China, and now
Speaker 1: Doctor Founci said, well, there was an effort. You know,
Speaker 1: we wanted to shut down sooner. We want tomittigate social
Speaker 1: did we were getting pushed back? How could he have
Speaker 1: been getting pushed back? Went in as recently February twenty
Speaker 1: ninety was even advocating for any measures such as mitigation
Speaker 1: or it just in fact, he was even saying skip
Speaker 1: the mask and wash your hands. February seventeen. Dr Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: If testing shows the virus has slipped into the country
Speaker 1: in places federal officials don't know about, we've got a problem.
Speaker 1: Short of that, Dr Fauci says, skip the masks unless
Speaker 1: you're contagious, don't worry about catching anything from Chinese products. Certainly,
Speaker 1: don't avoid Chinese people at restaurants whenever you have the
Speaker 1: threat of a transmissible infection. Their varying degrees from understandable
Speaker 1: to outlandish extrapolation of fear. Other advice from Dr Fauci
Speaker 1: and masks man. The only people need masks or those
Speaker 1: already infected, just wash your hands February seven. Teams now,
Speaker 1: but he's trying to make Dr Fauci the fall guy
Speaker 1: for anything here we're just beginning to wonder why Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is a bigger target, and we know the answer
Speaker 1: to the question, and I'm just trying to get you
Speaker 1: all up to speed, those of you that don't know it,
Speaker 1: that the continuation to get Trump effort is front end
Speaker 1: center over the virus for these people.