WEBVTT - CZM Rewind: Oops All Gambling, Political Betting Joins the News

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Call Zone Media.

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Last week, two major news networks, CNN and CNBC partnered

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>with the so called prediction market Calshi, an online political

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>betting platform, to use Calshi's real time betting data in

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>TV news segments, online news content, and as Calshi announced

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>on X the Everything app quote to integrate prediction Markets

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 2>into CNN's global newsroom, with Kalshi threatening quote, a new

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>era of media is here. This is it could happen here.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Garrison Davis. Regular CNN viewers may have noticed this

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>integration has already been happening for some time. This past

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 2>election cycle, news anchors used betting odds in place of

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>an addition to polling data to weigh the likelihood of

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 2>candidates when elections. CNN's chief data analyst, Harry Enton Nate

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Silver Protege, who used to work for five thirty eight

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>trailblazed the use of political gambling data in news stories

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>earlier this year. How she praised Entin by name in

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 2>their announcement of the CNN partnership.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Quote.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Entin is an expert at translating what data and polling

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>are saying on any given issue, and through this integration,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>he can tap into real time prediction markets data to

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>better inform and fact check his reporting unquote. Here's an

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>example of this reporting in a CNN segment from October

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 4>If you go back six months ago, you go back

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 4>to April k bauldwhen what were we looking at, Well,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 4>we were looking at the Democrats with a very clear

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 4>shot of taking control of the US House of Representatives.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>According to the Calshi prediction market odds, we saw him.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>In an eighty three percent chance.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 4>But those odds have gone plummeting down now we're talking

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 4>about just a sixty three percent chance, while the gopiece

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>chances up like rocket up like gold, up from seventeen

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 4>percent to now a thirty seven percent chance. So will

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>look like a pretty clear Demo likely Democratic win in

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 4>the House come next year has become much closer to

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 4>toss up at this point, although still slightly leaning Democratic.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Harry Enton never clarifies how these quote unquote odds are

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 2>formed or what they really are. To a viewer who

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>just tuned in or maybe isn't paying that much attention,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>it would be very unclear that these numbers are actually

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>from a gambling website. They're just big percentages displayed on

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>screen the way you would see polling data or legitimate

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>information used in a newsroom. This short section using the

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Caushi prediction market odds was then followed by three minutes

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>of analysis using selective mid term voting data from twenty

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>seventeen to twenty eighteen to support the movement in these

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>gambling odds. The gambling odds themselves with a load bearing

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>piece of information in this piece. Calshi's main competitor, another

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>so called prediction market called poly Market, partnered with x

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the Everything app and Yahoo Finance earlier this year to

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>integrate their prediction data into online news content. Time Magazine

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>and Sports Illustrated have also both launched deals with the

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>prediction market platform Galactic. So what exactly are these prediction

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>markets and how do they function? On poly Market and Calshi,

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>users can bet yes or no on the outcome of

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a question relating to world events, which is called a market.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>As more money is wagered on either side, the odds

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of the outcome change. Currently, top questions include various predictions

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>for Time Person of the Year, will the US strike

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela before the end of the year, the release of

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the Epstein files, and who will be the next president.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Calshi has tried chances at six percent. Here's Polymarket CEO

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Shane Copelan explaining on sixty minutes.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You make money if you're right, you lose money if

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong, and as a result, it creates this information

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's really isful for people.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 2>These companies would like you to believe that the ratio

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>of people betting yes or no on a certain outcome

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of world events is somehow useful or reliable information for

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the general public to forecast the future, whether that's through

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>betting on the likelihood of an upcoming recession, the winner

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of a sports game, which days of the week Israel

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 2>will bomb Gaza, or what movie will win Best Picture.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 2>Almost fifty million dollars is currently being wagered over a

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>potential Russia Ukraine ceasefire in twenty twenty five. Production markets

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>currently have three billion dollars in weekly trading volume. I

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>do need to note these companies argue that hedging out

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 2>homes of world events legally is not gambling, because that

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>would be illegal. Payments through unauthorized gambling sites are illegal

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of two thousand

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and six, which suppressed the early prediction markets of the

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, but CALSHI is regulated as a platform for

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>trading financial derivatives rather than securities trading or straight up

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>legalized gambling, and this determines what entity they have to

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>register with and what regulations they're subject to. CALSHI launched

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one with a federal license from the

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and after a year's long battle,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in October twenty twenty four, a federal appeals court ruled

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in favor of CALSHI, allowing online prediction market betting on

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>US elections, rejecting claims by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that the practice was illegal gambling and their concerns that

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>prediction market betting could undermine a lie election integrity. Former

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>CFDC chairman Rostam benham My statement in May of twenty

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, reading quote contracts involving political events ultimately commoditize

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and degrade the integrity of the uniquely American experience of

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>participating in the democratic electoral process. Allowing these contracts would

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>push the CFTC, a financial market regulator, into a position

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>far beyond its Congressional mandate and expertise quote. A week

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 2>before his dad took office in January twenty twenty five,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump Junior became a strategic advisor at Calshi. Polymarket

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>launched in twenty twenty without registering with the Commodity Futures

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Trading Commission, and was fined one point four million dollars

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>by the CFTC in twenty twenty two for operating as

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>an unregulated exchange and was henceforth prohibited from allowing bets

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>from US based users. Though the Polymarket CEA EO sees

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>it a little different.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 5>It was at one point four million dollars fine, and

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 5>also it was a settlement and you could not have

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 5>customers in the United States.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we had to go in geoblock trading in the

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>US and move certain operations offshore. And it wasn't hey

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're banned from trading the US. It's like until you're licensed.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was breaking the law.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean people say, bring the law. It's like which law,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know? So if anything it's incompatible.

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>It's incompatible with the law. Yeah.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>With the regulatory matrix that existed the past two years,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Polymarket has found to be facilitating illegal gambling and subsequently

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>banned in the countries of Switzerland, France, the UK, Poland, Singapore, Belgium,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Romania and Australia. Most of these bands just required geoblocking users,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>which can be easily circumvented through the use of a VPN,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and since the financial transactions on poly market are all

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>done through cryptocurrency, it's not clear that poly market is

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>taking any steps to enforce these banksands beyond geo blocking.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>In the midst of facing regulatory hurdles and bands from

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>across the globe, Polymarket still exploded in popularity last year,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>attracting investment from Peter Thiel's venture capital firm and hundreds

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of new users, primarily driven by betting on

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the US presidential election, speculation on whether Biden would drop

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>out of the race and who Trump would pick as

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>vice president, all despite the platform technically being banned in

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the United States after the first presidential debate in July

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, around the attempted assassination of Trump and

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the RNC, Polymarket gained sixty thousand new accounts. The year prior,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>polymarket averaged two thousand, three hundred new accounts, per month.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 2>August twenty twenty four saw seventy thousand new accounts, September

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>ninety thousand, October three hundred thousand, the month after Trump's

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>second inauguration four hundred thousand. Currently, polymarket has over sixty

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 2>thousand daily active traders and hundreds of thousands of monthly

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>traders since October twenty twenty four. To give another example

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of their recent growth, in April twenty twenty three, Polymarket's

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>monthly volume was about three million dollars. A year later,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>it was thirty nine million. In November twenty twenty four,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>it was two point five billion. Last month, it was

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>three point seven billion. In summer twenty twenty five, cash

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Pttel's FBI and the CFTC under Trump dropped investigations into

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>whether polymarket was illegally allowing US users to place bets

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>using VPNs. Shortly thereafter, Donald Trump Junior's venture capital firm

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>invested in the platform, and Trump Junior himself joined Polymarket's

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>advisory board. Curiously, a few days after Trump Junior joined

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>poly Market, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced it was

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>going to allow poly market to operate in the United

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>States after acquiring another company that held a US license.

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>This past October, Trump's own truth Social announced it was

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>partnering with Crypto dot Com to launch truth predict quote,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 2>a revolutionary prediction market backed by President Trump for enhanced

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>decision making unquote. When Barry Weiss's sixty Minutes did a

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>puff piece on Polymarket with its CEO last week, Anderson

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Cooper inquired about the risk of insider trading, poly Market's CEO,

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Shane Kaplan, seemed to think that a little bit of

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>insider trading my be good actually.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 5>But predictive markets do rely on someone having some inside information.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that people going and having an edge

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to the market is a good thing. Obviously, you need

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to curate them, and you need to be really clear

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and stringent on where the line is drawn and like

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of ethics, and we spend a lot of time

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on that. But it's sort of an inevitability that this

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>will happen and there's a lot of benefits from it

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and people will adapt.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>The CEO did not elaborate on what polymarkets practice of

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 2>curating insider trading looks like and where their quote unquote

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>stringent line is drawn, because in reality it doesn't seem

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>this line exists. They essentially encourage insider trading through these

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>vague statements and lack of clear enforcement. From the point

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of view of these platforms, insider trading makes their prediction

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 2>markets more accurate, so it's a net positive, and if

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 2>it fucks over some users on the other side of

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a bet, that's just the cost of business. Last week,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>an alleged insider trader won over a million dollars for

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 2>bets on Google's twenty twenty five year in search rankings,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>listing twenty two out of twenty three in the correct order.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>This user has made a series of early bets related

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to Google the past year, like the exact release date

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of Google's Gemini three point zero, which they won one

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty thousand dollars on. But because this poly

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>market user isn't trading stock, there's no clear regulatory mechanism

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to stop this behavior, and polymarket can't reverse these trades

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>because they run through the blockchain, not that they would

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>even necessarily want to. Professional gambler, political data analyst and

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>poly Market advisor Nate Silver was also asked about insider

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>trading on the China Talk podcast two months ago.

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Are you worried about insider trading with this, with all

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 6>this political betting. I mean there's an aspect of like, look,

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 6>these are all crypto, you know, you get on these

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 6>markets with crypto and like like there were markets like

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 6>which way is Suzanne Collins going to vote? And you

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 6>know the sort of the like you know, like the

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 6>tail outcomes for like a legislative assistant in her office?

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 6>Are you know you can make ten times your salary?

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 6>And like a minute, right, what's your what's your think

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 6>think on this?

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 3>For sure?

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look, I think there are a couple of

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 7>qualifications though, Like, first of all, I think people on

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 7>the inside often earn't as well as some formed as

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 7>they think, and or there are some downsides having an

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 7>inside view and not an outside of you. You might

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 7>drinp the kool aid, so to speak, right, you might

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 7>be in a bubble.

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, I mean I mean there are ones where

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 6>it's like you can literally I mean there's been a

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 6>lots of group chats people talking about like very very

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 6>sketchy trades and one way bets that are being made

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 6>in the stock market of like what's going to happen.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 3>With a trade deal?

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean you can literally be the person who decides

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 6>right and be vetting on the side if weird.

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 7>If there are incentives to make money in a world

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 7>of eight billion people, many of them are very competitive,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 7>and all of whom and not all of them, most

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 7>of them access to the internet, right, people are going

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 7>to find a way a way to do it.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, Let's pause here for a sec. What do you

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>think Nick goes on to list as a comparison to

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>political insider trading as like an unfortunate but somewhat inevitable

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 2>consequence of our evolving system of finance.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 7>Like in the crypto space, we've seen like an increasing

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 7>the number of like crypto kidnappings. Right, Well, I mean

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 7>that's one of the consequences if people are worth vast

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 7>amounts of wealth that isn't very secure. It's just it's

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 7>just gonna gonna happen until you up security or have

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 7>better solutions or whatever else. And so like, you know,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 7>I don't think there's necessarily anymore or less insider creating

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 7>on polymarket then there might be for in sports betting side,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 7>we've seen a lot of sports betting scandals or for

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 7>regular equities, you know, I believe the literature says that

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 7>like members of Congress achieve abnormal returns from their stock portfolios,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 7>I'd have to double I'm sure there's some debate about that.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 7>I after like to double check that.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>It's fine, bros. It's just like cryptocurrency kidnapping. It's fine. Actually,

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>So Naate goes on to say that prediction market insider

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>trading isn't that different from congressmen doing insider trading on

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the stock market, or like rigged sports betting, but he

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>really neglects to emphasize that those things are also bad

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and should be aggressively clamped down on. That shouldn't be allowed,

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and prediction markets intentionally skirt regulation. They currently have far

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>less legal protections for users against unfair practices, and with

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>crypto they can be pretty anonymized, enabling bad actors. And

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>now news companies are legitimizing turning everyone's phone into a

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>corrupt casino for world events, whether that's Israel starving Palestine

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>or how many tweets Elon Musk is going to publish

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>this week. The day before CAW she announced their partnership

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>agreement with CNN and NCNBC. CBS aired a sixty minutes

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 2>puff piece on Polymarket anchored by Anderson Cooper.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 5>When we met with Copeland last month, more than three

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 5>point six million dollars had been wagered on whether or

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 5>not Venezuela's president, Nicholas Muduro would be out of power

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 5>by the end of the year. Polymarket users didn't think,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 5>so they gave it only a twenty three percent chance.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 5>And if you buy no on that, and you're buying

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 5>it at seventy eight cents and at the end of

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 5>the year he's still in power, yeah, you get a

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 5>dollar per share, so you've made a profit of twenty

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 5>to share. I can't see why this would be I mean,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to is a term addictive, but it

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 5>would be compelling.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe it is a TICNII well, certainly compelling.

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 3>This is how I see it.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>If you are into geopolitics, this creates an incentive for

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you to dig in to what's going on in Venezuela

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and try and get an edge.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Anderson Cooper, who both works for the newly Calshi partner

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 2>at CNN as well as CBS's Sixty Minutes, is so

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 2>hesitant to call this clearly addictive practice addictive quote unquote compelling.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's how Polymarket CEO Shane Copelan explained the platform earlier

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in this piece.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a site where you can basically bet on current events,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of question about the future, like an election,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, when a ton of people are betting,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you get the betting odds, which basically tell you how

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>likely each outcome.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Is and how accurate is it.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the most accurate thing we have as mankind right now,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>until someone else creates some sort of super crystal ball.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Anderson Cooper responds with narration that the CEO quote may

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 2>be prone to hyperbole, but he's definitely onto something unquote.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>In explaining how poly Market users attempt to seek truth

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and gain an edge, copeland told the story of how

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, an anonymous French user made over

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 2>eighty million dollars on poly Market by betting on Trump

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 2>winning the presidential election, and to bolster his bets, he

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 2>contracted YouGov to conduct private polls in swing states.

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>People thought he'd just liked Trump, and he had actually

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>commissioned a ton of private polls. He did something called

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>neighbor polling, which is you ask people who they think

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>their neighbors are likely to vote for four scenarios for

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an election where there's a stigma to saying you're going

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to vote for somebody, and people feel some sort of

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>social awkwardness. And what he noticed was there was huge

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy in the neighbor polling versus the normal polling, and

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the neighbor polling favored Trump enormously.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>He thought Trump was undervalued.

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>If this guy was not able to make eighty million,

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but rather able to make eighty thousand dollars, he would

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have never gone through the hassle. But when you get

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>markets that are big enough, you create this incentive for

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>people to go above and beyond to try and find truth.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 2>What the CEO is arguing here is that the sheer

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>scale of money being wagered creates incentive to quote unquote

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.239
<v Speaker 2>find truth. In media discussions of prediction markets, there's this

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 2>specter of objectivity around the gambled odds, which obviously the

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>CEO of poly Market has a personal incentive to encourage.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 2>But Anderson Cooper here doesn't challenge this notion of capital

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>t truth. Even though Donald Trump was way ahead in

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 2>prediction market odds back during the twenty twenty election, which

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>had his chances of winning that election far higher than

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 2>what pure polling models showed. Kalshi claims that prediction markets

0:19:55.680 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>can help journalists quote unquote fact check, but doesn't explain

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>how fact can be determined from speculative gambling markets. Where

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is the fact in gambling? Well, we will find out

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>after these ads. To quote from poly market advisor Nate

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Silver's blog The Silver Bulletin quote, It's basically good when

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>people are more exposed to probabilities and they become more normalized.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>But of course I also analyze poles and build probabilistic

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 2>models myself. In that capacity, I strongly disagree with the

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>notion that prediction markets can serve as a good substitute

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>for poles. These sorts of claims are sometimes advanced by

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the prediction market companies themselves, including poly Market. To be fair,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>one minor pet peeve is that both reporters and readers

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 2>often confuse probabilities for poll results unquote. As Nate goes

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>on to explain, if Trump is up fifty five to

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>forty five over Kamala Harris on a prediction market, that's

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>not saying that Trump is expected to win by ten points.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>It means that ten percent more users on the website

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>favor Trump winning, which is pretty close to a toss up.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 2>This confusion is a huge problem, which is bolstered in

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 2>both how prediction market companies market their platform, but also

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>how journalists use gambling data in news stories. If you

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>see a social media post, an advertisement, or a random

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>news segment showing percentages tied to pictures of two politicians

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>in a race without context, those betting numbers could be

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>interpreted in a number of ways and influence someone's perception

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>of an election and maybe even their choice on who

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to vote for, or even whether to vote at all.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>In an October speech, Zora Mumdani reference to Calshi billboards

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>predicting a Cuomo victory in the Democratic primary.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 9>When I walked the length of Manhattan just a few

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 9>days before the election, hundreds of New Yorkers marched alongside me.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 9>And when we strolled into Times Square under a billboard

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 9>with betting odds that showed Cuomo's chances of winning at

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 9>nearly eighty percent, we knew that the so called experts

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 9>were set to get it wrong yet again. Andrew Cuomo

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 9>was supposed to be inevitable. When you see the Calshi

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 9>odds that have our chances of victory in the nineties.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 9>Know this. You are reading the same things that Andrew

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 9>Cuomo read when he went to sleep each night in June,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 9>believing that his victory was promised. We cannot allow complace

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 9>see to infiltrate this movement.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Cal She excitedly shared the latter half of that clip,

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>proclaiming breaking zoron Mamdani references his Calci odds on stage,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Calshi is mainstream unquote despite this clip demonstrating how prediction

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>markets often suffer from inaccurate bias. Last week, Discount Steve Kornaki,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>former five poin thirty eight analyst and now CNN's data

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 2>expert Harry Enton shared this segment about the Tennessee District

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 2>seven special election on x the Everything app with the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>caption odds are Dems will come within ten points of

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a win, if not outright win.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 10>I would say, if you had to look at the

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 10>congressional map any district that Donald Trump won by twenty

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 10>two points, you would say, you know, you've got like

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 10>nearly a one hundred percent chance of winning if you're

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 10>running for Congress there.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 3>But what are the prediction markets saying right.

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, Yeah, what are we talking about in terms of

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 4>diction market huts. Look, the Democrat has a fifteen percent

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 4>chance of winning in that race. Okay, a fifteen percent chance,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 4>which ain't nothing in a district that Donald Trump won

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>by twenty two points. But here, I think is the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 4>key nugget on this side of the of the ledger,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 4>and that is a GOP win by under ten points.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a sixty eight percent chance of that. So there

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 4>is a more than two thirds chance that the Republican candidate, Yes,

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 4>they win, but they win by a significantly lower margin

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 4>than Donald Trump. We're talking about double digits, smaller. We're

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 4>talking about a huge, huge shift to the left. We're

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 4>talking about When you add these two together, we're talking

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 4>about a more than eighty percent chance that there is

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 4>a clear double digit shift to the left, and a

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent chance the Democrat actually wins in a district

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>that Donald Trump won by twenty two points. That just

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 4>shows you how bad the environment is for Republicans right now,

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 4>that the Democrat has any sort of a chance in

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 4>this talk to me about with a special lak.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>He's just authoritatively rattling off complete speculation on a Democrat victor.

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 2>As big screens display percentages in huge text with source

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Calci in tiny text the bottom of the screen. Ordinary

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>polling showed that this was a close race that leaned

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Red by two to eight points, and the Republican did

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>end up winning by nine points. To quote the broken

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 2>clock Nate silver quote. Without having polls to look at,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the prediction markets would probably kind of suck at making

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>election forecasts. Translating poles into probabilities is considerably more complicated

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>when there are many correlated races at once, such as

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>in the battle for the electoral College or control of Congress.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Prediction markets had a strong twenty twenty four in this regard.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>They leaned toward Trump when our model had it at

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty. I don't think this was because of

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>any special modeling insight per se, but because they incorporated

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>some sort of prior intuition that Trump would overperform his polls. Again,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 2>so give the markets credit for that. These sorts of

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 2>soft quote unquote intangible intuitions can be valuable, though you'd

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 2>need a lot of data to determine whether they add

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>or subtract value in the long run unquote, As Nate

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>himself acknowledges someone like Andrew Cuomo had much higher betting

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 2>odds throughout the entire New York mayoral race than a

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>purely statistical model would show. A contention I have with Nate.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 2>One of many is though I call prediction market numbers

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 2>gambling odds, they are not actual probabilities. These odds aren't

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>based on objective mathematical principles like flipping a coin, the

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 2>three door problem, or even something like blackjack. These odds

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>are created whole cloth through guessing, sometimes educated or day

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>informed guessing, but still primarily through people's intuition, which is

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>susceptible to group impulses. Many random world events lack a

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 2>reliable basis of continuous controlled data that's needed to form

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 2>a probability like that which is applied to legalized sports betting.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This is quite evident in the betting odds around the

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>last Papal conclave, which had very little relevant data to

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>use for informed predictions. There was no existing probability to

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>support the election of an American pope, a first time occurrence.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 2>With prediction markets, people can still do research to make

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>an informed bet, but it's not really the case that

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>ex candidate is mathematically expected to win an election. Eighty

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 2>out of one hundred instances, a hive mind of users

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 2>have formed that statistical division. Through the power of money,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of users are betting that a certain result

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 2>is likely to occur. So the problem isn't just that,

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 2>like Nate says, people are confusing probabilities for polls. It's

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're confusing prediction market betting odds for mathematical probabilities.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 2>It's this difference that allows betting on sports outcomes via

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Calshian polymarket, even in states that ban typical sports betting,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>because you're not actually betting on fixed odds, you're betting

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>against other investors. And now news companies are not just

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing consent and normalizing political gambling, but are actively encouraging

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the use of these platforms and endorsing the predictive capacity

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of these gambling markets. Anderson Cooper calls it the quote

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>unquote wisdom of crowds. But we already have methods for

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>learning group consensus, like polling, which may have problems, but

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>frankly far fewer problems than gambling on world events. Beyond

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the moral qualms of betting money on human suffering, prediction

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>markets are susceptible to not just personal bias, but group

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>bias based on the current ratio of odds. This in

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>group consensus can be influenced by short lived trending topics,

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and these platforms cater to a hyper online point of view.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Prediction market users provide a very non representational sample variety

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>pulling from a very specific type of guy who regularly

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>uses these platforms. To quote from Calsh's CNN Partnership announcement, quote,

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>cal she has become the definitive source for staying informed

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>about the future and is used by reporters, politicians, pundits,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street and Main Street get recently called the New

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>York City mayoral election eight minutes after polls closed, hours

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 2>before the media. It's because of this accuracy that calci's

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 2>data will serve as a powerful complement to CNN's reporting.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Lists can more easily surface credible information to their audiences

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>about the real time probabilities of future cultural and political

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>events unquote. In practice, this reporting mixes gambling data and

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:19.479
<v Speaker 2>actually reputable or credible pulls in a confusing way, like

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.239
<v Speaker 2>this recent scene end segment, which cites Calshi odds on

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>whether Trump will send tariff stimulus checks as well as

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>CBS you gov polling data on if tariff's lower prices

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>back to back In the same segment, do.

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 4>They think that the tariffs, that these rebay checks are

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 4>actually coming? And at this point now no, I mean

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 4>chance Trump tariff the tariff stimulus checks are sent to

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Americans by August of twenty twenty six. It's a twenty

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 4>five percent chance. That's one in four, So that's not nothing.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 4>But the American people right now are craving, craving some relief,

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>and at this point it doesn't look like it is coming.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Although I will note John Berman, this twenty five percent,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 4>it is greater than this six percent who say that

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 4>terrors decrease prices, or that five percent back in March,

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 4>which are just you never see one, two, three, four,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 4>five percent. So look, twenty five percent eight nothing.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 3>But at this point it's love.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.959
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's interesting the prediction, Marcus think they only one

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 10>in four chance that will actually happen.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>There is this really what the future of political forecasting

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 2>is going to be? Maybe, maybe not, but there are

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 2>four horsemen of this political gambling apocalypse. Nate Silver via

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>his gamification of election predictions based on his time as

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a professional gambler sports betting, especially since the Supreme Court

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>struck down a federal law banning sports betting outside of

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Nevada in twenty eighteen, resulting in almost forty states subsequently

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>legalizing some form of sports betting, which has facilitated the

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>cassibility of gambling to grow dramatically across the country in

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the past ten years through the spread of online sports

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>betting apps. The third horseman is Trump, for the Trump

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 2>administration through their removal of regulatory hurdles facing prediction markets.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 2>And finally that CNN guy Harry Enton, a Nate Silver

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>protege who trailblazed the use of political gambling data in

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 2>news stories the past year. These four horsemen, Nate Silver,

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>sports betting, Trump, and Harry Enton have created the cultural

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and political conditions for political gambling to spread. Like wildfire, which,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 2>hey is also something you can bet on. During the

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 2>LA Fires prediction market, users could bet on how many

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 2>acres would burn. So what is the endgame of this,

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>this gambling apocalypse that seems to be inching its way

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>closer and closer To answer that? Here's a clip from

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Calshi co founder and CEO Derek Manser.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 8>The long term vision is to financialize everything and create

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 8>a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion. We

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 8>are living in a where like we have an abundance

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 8>of information, but there's a lot of noise, and like

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 8>we don't really understand what's really from what's not. And

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 8>prediction markets are an antidote to that. They do very

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 8>very good job at distilling information and surfacing truth to people.

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 3>And you're seeing the sort.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 8>Of massive shift where like people are using them whenever

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 8>they think about questions about the future, you know, whenever

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 8>they're debating about anything. And I think that trajectory is

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 8>going to keep going. That's a new consumer habit that

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't think is going to be undone.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the demon child of crypto and sports betting,

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>This financialization of everything to form a tradable asset out

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>of any difference in opinion, creating new addictive consumer habits.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>These companies want to apply the logic of smartphone sports

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 2>betting to everything, where everyone gets to be their own

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 2>little Nate Silver while carrying around their own digital casino

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 2>in their pocket, getting addicted to gambling on speculation of

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>world suffering, and CNN is complicit in this. CNN and

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>others have decided to partner with platforms that enable the

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 2>people who decide when to drop bombs around the world

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 2>to win millions of dollars by betting money on the

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 2>choices they themselves are making at the expense of the

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world. And these companies think this is

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a good thing because the betting odds can serve as

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a potential heads up that something is likely to happen.

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Simple consumer protections for users, which currently are non existent,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>are just not enough. Congress needs to be far more

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>involved in regulating online betting, and in the case of

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 2>political events, it should just be completely banned. It is

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 2>detrimental to a healthy society. It incentivizes corruption, cruelty, and

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>erodes public trust. Gambling doesn't need to go away entirely,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>when it should return to being time and location locked,

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 2>go to Las Vegas like a fucking adult. Currently, there

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 2>is no existing mechanism for individual states to regulate prediction markets.

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Only the federal government can, and Trump's federal government certainly

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 2>seems like it's not going to considering the president's sun

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>works for both of the main platforms Kalshi and poly Market,

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and while news companies are legitimizing this, these platforms are

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 2>now working as their own news aggregators, specifically Polymarket's social

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 2>media account, which is acting as a news aggregation account

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 2>because that drives traffic back to their website, where people

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 2>can bet on the news stories that poly market is sharing,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>even if those news stories are speculative or completely made up.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 2>On December fifth, Polymarket posted quote just in suspected J

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 2>six Pipe Bomber's legal council projected to argue he was

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>included in Trump's pardon of those involved in January sixth quote.

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>This claim subsequently spread all around the parroted by people

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 2>of a variety of political orientations. But if you read closely,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the original post says suspected J six Pipe Bomber's legal

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 2>council projected to argue he was included in Trump's pardon,

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Polymarket is just spreading gambling information as if it is

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>news content. Quote unquote projected just means that polymarket users

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 2>are betting on this. But these projected posts are mixed

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in with other posts just aggregating the day's news. So

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>unless you are paying super close attention, which rarely people

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 2>on the Internet are. This becomes a trojan horse of disinformation.

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>When news companies use the term projected on election night,

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 2>usually that indicates, with pretty clear mathematical certainty, that an

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 2>event is going to happen. When polymarket uses projected in

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>news tweets, it only indicates that Internet gamblers are swinging

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 2>around money in an effort to create truth, with once

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 2>legitimate news companies not just complicit but active participants in

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 2>this process that isn't for us today at it could

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>happen here, see you on the other side. It could

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 2>happen here is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website coolzonmedia

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 2>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 2>now find sources for it could Happen here listed directly

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.