WEBVTT - Space Poop, Contact Congress and Elf on the Shelf

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to hous To Works Now. I'm your host, Lauren Vocabaum,

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a researcher and writer here at hous To Works every

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>week and bringing you three stories from our team about

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the weird and wondrous advances we've seen in science, technology,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and culture. This week, NASA is commissioning new ideas for

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how to handle poop in space and unrelated Some social

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>scientists are saying that good behavior based Christmas traditions like

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Santa Crampus and now the Elf on the Shelf acclimate

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>our children to the concept of a surveillance state. But

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>First Senior Writer Jonathan Strickland brings us a less festive

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but equally important political segment. Thanks to our freelancer Patrick

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Jake Haiger for the research on this one, and to

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Scherb, the director of legislative Affairs for a government

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>transparency and accountability lobby Common Cause, for speaking with us

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about the issue. Together, these three humans answer an increasingly

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>relevant question, how can we ordinary citizens get members of

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress to really listen to us? Following the US election,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>people on all sides of every issue have been motivated

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to voice their opinions and concerns. But what's the most

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>effective method to getting a congress person's attention. Warning, this

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>piece is about the United States, so people in some

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>other countries may also find it helpful when interacting with

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>their respective governments. I have some tough news for those

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of us who rely on the Internet to get our

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>point across. It's not terribly effective when it comes to

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>actually reaching someone in Congress. Online communication is generally pretty terrific,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at least for those who have the means to access it.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's instantaneous, and on platforms like Facebook or Twitter, it's

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>easy to share, promote, or add two messages. But when

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to making a real difference on the political level,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not great. One reason for that is it can

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>be difficult for a congress person and to determine how

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>many messages come from actual constituents. If you represent a

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>state like Georgia, for instance, you don't really care what

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>someone in California thinks. California voters don't elect you to office.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>With most online platforms, it's difficult or impossible to determine

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>where people actually live. For that reason, many politicians pay

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>little attention to messages on social media. Email doesn't fare

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>much better, particularly online form letters, Congressional staff tend to

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>perceive them as one step above spam mail, or maybe

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>even a lateral move. If you do send an email,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>writing your own words is better than relying on a

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>form letter format. Snail mail is a bit more effective.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>A handwritten or type letter tends to be treated with

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>more care than electronic communication, particularly if you take the

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>time to write your thoughts out yourself. But the two

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>most effective means of communication when trying to make your

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to be phone calls and in person meetings. That's

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not great for those of us who suffer from social anxiety,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but the truth of the matter is that these methods

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to be taken more seriously than others. According to

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Emily Ellsworth, a former congressional staffer, taking the time and

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>effort to contact a congress person's office or arrange a

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting is necessary if you really want to affect the

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>political process. Though unless you're a politically influential person, you're

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not likely to land a meeting with the actual congress person. Instead,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll chat with one of his or her staffers. Still,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that's usually more effective than tweeting how angry you are

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about a political issue. Unfortunately, This means many people are

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>left without an effective way to make their voices heard

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because it requires them to have spare time and resources

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate to such activities, and it could be argued

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that thousands of people are wasting their time voicing their

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>concerns online rather than banding together to attend town hall

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>meetings and other events in person. Online communication could still

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be an effective means to organize like minded individuals, but

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to making a difference, nothing measures up

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to talking directly to congressional staff. Next up, I've got

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for you from our freelance writer, Kate Kirshner

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and none less than the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>How can we better handle excrement in space? So here's

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what we know about everybody. They hurt, they dance, and

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they poop. From the Queen of England to the Queen's Corgis.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody on Earth has got to go, and everybody not

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on Earth too. The world has long been interested in

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom habits of astronauts. We ourselves devoted whole articles

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and podcasts to it. But the truth is that it

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't always been terribly high. Astronauts on the first of

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Pollo missions literally had bags taped to their bums to

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>catch the crud. Alan Shepherd had to sit in a

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>soggy suit before taking off to become the first American

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in space. It's gotten better. The International Space Station has

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum section system that allows for a clean and

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>easy disposal. Once waste is collected, the solid waste is

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>flowing into space and urine is converted into possible drinking water.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And if the I s S were to lose pressure

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and astronauts were confined to their suits, well, the I

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>s S is only a few hours away from Earth,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not long enough to cause huge harm if its crew

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>were left to wallow in their filth, and while they're

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in their suits, diapers not exactly sustainable or healthy for

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more than a few hours. But as NASA considers missions

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>far away from Earth on places like Mars, the space

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>agency now needs some ideas about how astronauts can contain

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>their waste in a space suit. So they're asking the

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>public to help troubleshoot the issue and dangling a thirty

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar prize for an elegant solution. Something to keep in

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>mind before you get busy designing. NASA needs a solution

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that allows a fecal, urine and menstrual waste to be

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>rooted away from the body, and that can hold up

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to six days of waste. Here's a fun fact. NASA

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>has estimated that astronauts would need to excrete seventy five

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>grams that's two point six ounces of fecal matter per day.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But the folks that Encyclopedia Britannica say that the average

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>human drops off between one hundred and two hundred and

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty grams that's between three point five and eight point

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>eight ounces. What's up with the discrepancy. Maybe the space

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>diet produces less feces. Also, the proposed solution has to

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>work in microgravity, and of course there's not a lot

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of space to work with. Astronauts suits already contain a

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of important equipment, and there's not loads of room

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>for extra bulk. Got an idea? Get working? The contest

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>opened on October eleven, and all submissions are due by December.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for our delay and response. For more information, you

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can head on over to hero x dot com slash

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>space poop. Finally, this week senior writer and Stuff to

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind. Co host Robert Lamb raises questions about

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some beloved Christmas traditions, both low and old. In Court

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>mc McCarthy's The Crossing, the author wrote, deep in each

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>man is the knowledge that something knows of his existence,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>something knows and cannot be fled nor hid from. America's

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>elder scribe of philosophic grimness was of course talking about

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>God here or whatever counts for God and the violent

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>delights of McCarthy's Border trilogy. But his grim pronouncement may

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>well extend beyond the unblinking eye of divine judgment and

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>into our modern holiday traditions. I speak, of course, of

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Elf on the Shelf. Now, perhaps this most foul

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of Santa's Mermadon's has yet to infiltrate your house. After all,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they were only unleashed in two thousand five with the

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>publication of Chandra Belle's children's book. In the years to follow,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the elf dolls made their way into millions of homes,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>each with Bell's scripture to govern the practices surrounding their

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>supernatural presence. Yes, uninitiated, the Elf on the Shelf comes

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with rules. Each parent is encouraged to establish the following guidelines.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Number one, thou shalt not touch the elf, lest the

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sorcery of its creation drained from its form, isolating it

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>forever from Santa's realm. And number two, the elf shalt

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>neither move nor speak while its human subjects remain awake,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>confining its unnatural movements to the inky, black dead of night.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The elf watches, the elf waits. The elf reports all

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>childhood behaviors back to its bearded polar master, so that

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:46.239
<v Speaker 1>he might exact his holiday judgment upon them. Stephen Nissenbaum,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>author of The Battle for Christmas, even likens traditional Christmas is,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>what with their crampuses and coal threats, to quote many

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>days of doom. The elf seems an extension of that.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Toys or no toys, candy or no andy. For the

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>materialistic child, the stakes could scarcely be any higher. It's

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a formative time, after all, when children learned to navigate

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the waters of social responsibilities to human and inhuman agents alike.

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>As such, it's no wonder that parents still argue over

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the potential harm of invoking Santa's magic on young children.

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The elf on the shelf, however, has not lived among

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>our holiday traditions quite as long. It's less shielded from

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>our distrust and revulsion, and perhaps we feel this way

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for a good reason. In the two thousand fifteen article

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Who's the Boss, The Elf on the Shelf and the

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Normalization of Surveillance, authors Laura Pinto and Selena Namoran questioned

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to what extent this vile wooden idol indoctrinates children into

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the mindset of the panopticon to refresh? The panopticon, which

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>means all seeing, was a theoretical prison design championed by

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham in seventy seven. The prison would,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory, require minimal supervision while offering an effective, sufficient

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>means of regulating a prison population. Cells would line the

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>interior walls of a vast enclosure, and a central tower

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ensured that any given prisoner might suffer the guard's scrutiny

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at any moment. The Panopticon was never built as Bentham

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>envisioned it, though numerous facilities would later cite panopticonic influences

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in their design. For the most part, the idea of

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the panopticon lives on only as a metaphor for surveillance.

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Twentieth century French historian and philosopher Michael Fouco expounded much

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on this notion, stating that modern disciplinary society breaks down

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to three key governmental techniques to control the masses. Hierarchical observation, normalizing, judgment,

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and examination. Welcome to the panopticon. The elf on the shelf,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>unblinking in its lifeless gaze but imbued with parentally induced

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>holiday magic, would seem to offer all three of these

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>panopticonic techniques. It serves in Santa's hierarchy and stands as

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a symbol of you liiquitous judgment and examination. These factors,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Pinto and Nomoran argue, make the elf particularly problematic in

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>our information age. Sure, Santa was always watching you. He

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>knows when you're sleeping, he knows when you're awake. We

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>get it. But human agents always mitigated, either in the

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>form of holiday stress parents or perhaps one of Santa's

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>helpers at the shopping mall. The elf on the shelf, however,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is far from human. It can't be bargained with, it

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or fear, and it absolutely will not stop, you know,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>until Christmas morning, at least in this time of hacked

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>emails and Pilford eye cloud, photos of doxing attacks, and

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>professor watch lists. Pinto and no Moorn's words of caution

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ring all the more true. Quote. While the elf may

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be part of a pre Christmas game and might help

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>manage children's behaviors and the weeks leading up to the holiday,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it also sets children up for dangerous, uncritical acceptance of

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>power structures. Perhaps it's time to rise is up against

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>elvin oppression. Perhaps it's time to cast down their likenesses,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>question authority, and remind our children that privacy still exists

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and that the unblinking, judging eye of eternal surveillance is

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not free to roam our homes. Perhaps we can even

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>stick to those values as long as it takes us

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to lose patience with Junior's morning checklist, all the while

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the Polar Panopticon waits patiently. That's our show for this week.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for tuning in. Further thanks to

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>our audio producer Dylan Fagan and our editorial liaison Christopher

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Hasseiotas filling in for Alice in louder Milk. Subscribe now

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for more of the latest science news and send us

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>links to anything you'd like to hear us cover plus

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the name of your favorite hip hop album, classic, recent, whatever.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email at now podcast at

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com, and of course, for lots

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more stories like these, head on over to our home

0:12:54.800 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>planet Now dot how stuff works dot com.