WEBVTT - Victoria Espinel Talks Trump Tariffs on Tech

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 2>The Trump Administration's focus on trade continues to impact tech companies.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Apple is seeking relief from President Trump's tariffs on goods

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>imported from China with more investments in the US. Trump

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>also signed a memorandum on Friday to counter digital services

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>taxes some countries imposts on US tech giants. All of

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>this as the US is competing to lead the way

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>in AI and quantum computing. Here to unpack the impact

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of these developments is Victoria Espadel, CEO of the Business

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Software Alliance. Victoria, It's pretty clear that President Trump has

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 2>declared himself pro innovation, pro technology, but what do you

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 2>make of the way he's going about it?

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 3>So, as you say, I think the administration has been

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>really transparent about what their goals are in terms of

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>innovation and competition, and it's interesting to see them approaching

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>it in a variety of different ways. Some are focus

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on trying to promote US industry, some are trying to

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 3>are focused on trying to protect US industry. But you're

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>seeing this across trade. I think you're going to see

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>it in the AI Action Plan that the administration is

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be working on soon. We are hoping that

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>quantum competitiveness will be part of what the White House

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 3>is focused on. So I think you're going to be

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>seeing this in a number of areas.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Your whole role is advancing enterprise software companies, leadership and

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>global policies. So how much are they having their voices

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>heard when we see the latest impact on Digital Services Act?

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But then also what's happening with China and the impact

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that has on an Apple for example.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's you know, you raise a Digital Services Act.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>It's true that that's an act that has more of

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>a focus on social media companies, for example, rather than

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>enterprise software. There are, but there are so many impacts

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that the atrump of administration can have I think, including

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 3>many in a positive way on enterprise software. Some of

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the issues that are front of mind are not ones

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>that are going to be impacted by enterprise so for

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>exampleple speech issues. You know, there's a lot that's happening

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that's really positive from AI enterprise and AI software that's

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 3>not going to be impacted by those. But on the

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>other hand, I think the administration has a real opportunity

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>to lead in terms of digital trade. I think they

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 3>have a real opportunity to lead in terms of AI adoption.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know, there's so much there's so much focus

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and attention to building the large LM models, and of

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 3>course that's important, but what we really need to have

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the broadest positive economic impact is AI adoption across a

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>wide range of industries. And that is something that I

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 3>think there's real potential for the administration to take the

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>lead on.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And companies have been trying to think of Microsoft and

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>really focusing in on the consumer applications with the mastaff

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are soonly went to high for example, and proportion of

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>him Victoria. What is it then the companies that you're

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>talking with, and that companies currently are trying to navigate

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe be politicking as we see with Tim Cook,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>how what do they really want? Is it clarity or

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is it actually that they do want change here?

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about AI and what's happening in AI

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 3>regulation And I would say, you know, speaking for enterprise software,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I think there are at a broad level, there are

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 3>three things that we want. First, we are pro regulation.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>We think it makes sense to have regulation. What we

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>don't want is bad regulation. And what I would characterize

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>bad regulation is regulation that's unworkable regulation that is addressing

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the wrong issues, So I think that's important. Second, there

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>needs to be clarity. One of the hindreds is the

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>innovation we have right now is there's so much churn

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 3>in the system. Is regulation coming is it not? Who

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>will it apply to? Who will it want? And that

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>is an enormous drag on a company's ability to innovate

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and plan forward. And then the third thing that we

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>need is consistency. The thing that is even worse than

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>lack of clarity is inconsistency across different laws being passed

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 3>by the US States, different laws being passed by other

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>countries that are in conflict for on one another. And

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>that is even more of a problem if you are

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>a small company, that is going to have even more

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>difficulty dealing with those. So no bad regulation, clarity and

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>consistency are three things that are critical if we are

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>going to continue to move forward.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Victoria, you mentioned the small players. A lot of the

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>headlines come from the big tech giants, But what do

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>some of the policies that you're thinking about, How would

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>that affect perhaps some of the smaller technology companies. Would

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>it only benefit the large incumbents.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 3>I think actually, in many cases the biggest positive impact

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 3>will be on the smaller companies, so they won't be

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 3>held down by, for example, unworkable or inconsistent regulation. I mean,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>there's so much happening in the AI policy space, but

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>here are two things that I would emphasize, and I

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>think these will have an impact on all companies, including

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and perhaps in particular small companies. One is at the

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 3>federal level. So in terms of what's happening here in Washington, DC,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 3>a focus on promoting AI adoption is something that we're

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>expecting to see and there's been support for that in

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the past, but we're expecting a lot more activity this

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>year coming year on AI adoption. But the second thing

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 3>I would say is that any company that wants to

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 3>understand what is happening in AI regulation right now has

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 3>to be looking at what is happening in the states.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 3>There is the US States. There's a tremendous amount of

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>activity there. We're very focused there. You had Colorado pass

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the first comprehensive AI law last year, but now you

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 3>have Texas, Connecticut, Virginia, California. They all want to be next,

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>and that the states are going to move legislation and regulation.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>So when you talk about all companies, but in particular

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 3>small companies trying to deal with this the regulation that's coming,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and trying to deal with inconsistencies that we may see there.

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>If that comes to pass, that is going to be

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>a big drag on innovation points.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Espanel from the Business Software Alliance, thanks so much

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us.