WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed Moving Closer to Normalization, Sinche Says

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>their trust in independent registered investment advisors to the tune

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of four trillion dollars. Why learn more and find your

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>independent advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg. Right now, let's bring in Robertson.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>She's with Amber's Pure Pont Bob. We've been talking through

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the morning about where we are. Is it a good

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>time to take advantage of the volatility that's coming or

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is that a risky business? Pros love movement in the market,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where you make money. Things have been quiet supposedly.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be more volatile into the end

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think we are going to see

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>significant increases in volatility as we go forward. I think

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things are driving at One is obviously

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the potential that the FED will finally high rates, and

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that always tends to create some volatility. Uh. Second is

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we have not only the election here. We have discussions

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about Greek fiscal policy coming up later this year with

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the EU potential there. We have a big referendum in

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Italy coming up about the future governance there and what

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that implies for for reforms going forward. We have ongoing

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>reform processes in a number of places Brazil, around the world.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are some catalyst as we go

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>into the latter part of the year. And of course

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the central banks, I think is another big one. I

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.279
<v Speaker 1>think central banks really are beginning to push back against

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this notion that they can continue to solve all the

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>world's problem. David wants to go big and wide. Let

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>me go you right now. Is there a Monday trade

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>from Robert Sinch? I mean, is there something that just

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 1>screams because you know, you do some great obscure stuff. Yen, luony,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>luoni yen, and that is there something that sticks out

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>right now? You know? We we we talked to a

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago about UM the movement down in

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the pace SO and we thought that that to take

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>out the oil play. UM. You know, we could be

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>um short Canada long pace SO or short Russian Ruble

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>short pace so. Um, you know, I think we've had

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good rebound now in the Mexican pace, so

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>from around twenty down to under nineteen. I think that

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>trade is is played out for now. I still think

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>we're going higher in the dollar, um. And I think

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we could see you know, dollar yen higher, we could

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>see euro dollar lower. So I do think this is

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an environment where the dollar is going to you better,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and we should look at the dollar versus a basket

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of foreign currencies. Right, Tom mentioned this is a Monday,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance to regroup after what happened last week. Let's

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the flash crash, what we saw in Sterling

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a few days hence. Now, what's your reaction to what

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>happened there? What? What? What conclusion should we draw from

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened there? You know, in the foreign exchange world,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>there is this because it's an over the counter market. Uh.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And there is this strange time between the clothes in

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>New York and the real opening time in Asia. Um. Now,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this was twenty years ago when I used to manage money,

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but we used to leave overnight orders to go into

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Asian session. We would specifically limit no transactions between

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>five pm and seven pm New York time, because we

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>knew there was tremendous illiquidity going into this New Zealand

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Australian marketplace. That's when we had this volatility again the

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>other night. And uh, you know, I would have thought

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the markets had grown up from that, but there is

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>still that awkward period between the New York close and

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the Singapore Hong Kong open when you can off and

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>get these very volatile moves in markets. And I think

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what we saw the other Now, your sense there

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is it was a liquidity issue, nothing nothing more. I

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was a liquidity issue. We may find out

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in some earnings reports that there was some errors made

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere along the way, um, but clearly it was. It

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was such a disorderly move that you have to chalk

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this up to illiquidity and probably an error that somebody

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>will will fess up to at some point in the future.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed, Bob that I didn't bring this up earlier

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Let's cover it right now. I noticed obviously

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>weak sterling, but just in the last week week euro

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's almost like a little wind shifting here.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Sterling dollar is cable, euro, Sterling is across the channel fuel,

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>which do you look at? Which matters here? Well, I

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think again this becomes is this a just a move

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>down for sterling or is this a move up for

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the dollar? You know, we've seen dollar yen back up

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>above one oh three, it held that one hundred level

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>back at one oh three. We've seen euro dollar come

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>below one twelve. We've seen sterling obviously move lower. At

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what point do we start talking about a stronger dollar

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than just a weak cable. And I think we're

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at that point round right now. You know, if you

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>look at at five year interest rate differentials around the world,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, five year swap rate in the US relative

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to five year swap rates in in other major countries,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and you wait that by the waitings of the Dollar

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>index at d x Y, this is the widest differential

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>in favor of the dollar this year. So quietly, over

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks, interest rate differentials really have

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>shifted back in favor of the dollar. And suddenly it's

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the dollar moving higher rather than sterling moving lower. But

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>then the euro goes with ster What I'm in, what

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing as an amateur, is euros becoming attached to sterling.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a wrong assessment. I think it's more than

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is moving higher and the euro actually I

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>think is is holding up better um than I would

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>have expected it. And David, this is really important, and

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the compensating factors of different currency pairs. One

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest mistakes I see in for an exchange

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>analysis is we don't look at them as pair traits.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 1>And there's a set of pair trades. Of course, David,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you had memorized permutations and combinations. I mean, I mean,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>do you know that David's from Brooklyn and Bob he

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>learned permutations and combinations growing kale on his roof because

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>he knows there's like a hybrid lens, hybrid lens of kale.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the same way in foreign exchange. David, I have

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a modern day Mendel. Let me ask you more about

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the pace. So, as I mentioned, you had this great

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>note Mexico and oil not connected here. You know, we

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>had the debate last night, we've been tracking the pay

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 1>so with Donald Trump's pull rings, with Hillary Clinton's pullings,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you have sort of a novel look at what we're

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>seeing there. Yeah, I mean I think that you know

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there are there are two different time frames to look at, right,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that UM, the rebound and oil had

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not been showing up in the pay so UM primarily

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>because of this uncertainty about the election outcome. UM. And

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>as we pull that away, you sort of get back

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentals and and uh, you know, in the short run,

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>there is so little going on in these markets these days,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and so few drivers in the foreign exchange markets that

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>traders are willing to to basically jump on anything that's moving.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the notion of this um, you know,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump victory probability and movements in the pace so really

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>caught on in the markets, and it becomes a self

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling prophecy, right if people think that other people are

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to trade dollar pace so based on the election movements,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and they'll start doing it, and it feeds on itself,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and that works until it doesn't. And I have a

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>feeling that you know, obviously over the next three weeks

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find out that there are four weeks that

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work anymore because we've we passed the election.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're starting to do that. And I

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think that part of what the movement and the big

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>movement up in the Peso in the last a week

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or so has been a realization that, hey, you know,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>energy prices have gone up, oil prices have gone up.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We've completely forgot about this relationship with oil and now

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a bit of a catch up move

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going on. Robert Sinch with this amorous Pierpunt updateus on

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the institution that is this Federal Reserve system. Mr Trump

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to go after this institution and that would President

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump change the FED? You know, I think one of

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the concerns, you know, I have a couple of concerns

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about central banks. One that I think they've played their

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>hands as far as they can and they really are

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>running out of options and anything that's really going to

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>affect the economies and inflation going forward. The second is

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this little bubbling up of intrusion on central bank independence.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a little bit of it in Japan where

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>people around Prime Minister Abbe have been making comments about

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>how the ee O J needs to continue to take

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>more action. Um, I'm not sure what's really left for

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>them to do. That's a big demographic problem they're facing

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in Japan. Uh. We've seen Prime Minister May in the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>UK make a couple of pretty shocking statements. One of

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>them was about the side effects of central bank actions.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure what the implication of that was.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And now I think, you know, we we certainly saw

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>last night that that Mr Trump said he would instruct

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a attorney general, an attorney general to look

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>into Hillary Clinton's I mean, this is kind of unprecedented stuff.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>You wonder what he would instruct the Treasury secretary to

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>do about monetary policy. So I think there is this

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>concern that after holding up monetary policy is the real

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>savior for the global economies, that now that they're running

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on empty uh and fiscal policy is nowhere to be seen,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that they start encroaching more on monetary policy. Um, and

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a concern about central bank independence going forward.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Had stand Fisher, the vice chairs speak yesterday, Janet Yellen

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking at the Boston FED later this week, do you

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the Yelling Fed could be doing more to

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>emphasize this point that it is not subject to political winds.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You you hear it from the outside, you here economists

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>defending it, but um, we haven't heard explicitly from a

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>chair Janet Yellen, at least not not explicitly and not

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in quantity. A lot here about the independence of the Fed.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. Knowing some people who have been with the FED,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>my guess is they're pretty baffled by this. I think

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting there going, wait a second, we're the only

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ones who have been acting here. Um, we are. We

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are not political in our decision process, although they've been

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>accused of that, UM. And I think that that they

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>get a little surprised at these things even bubble up

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like this. Um, we'll probably get a bit defensive about it,

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>circle the wagons as they normally do. UM. But I

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think part of this is they they brought it on

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves by their rhetoric of talking about about normalizing policy

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>and then not doing it. A whole seg inn of

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the American population that is wondering why they saved and

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>why they're not getting any return on those savings for retirement.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of of of tensions are

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>bubbling up and again because fiscal policy around the world

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>has been so non participatory in this process, what do

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>people do. They keep focusing back on the monetary authorities

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world. UM as as miracle workers, and I

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think they need to keep pushing back and saying they've

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>done what they can do. I I wonder as you

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look ahead, there's so much scuttle but here that Leo

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Brander might be a Hillary Clinton Treasury search differences this

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>can preclude that from happening. Do you think if if

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton would be elected? No, I don't think so.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that, um, you know, there there may

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>be some concern about you used to worry about movements

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>between the Fed and Wall Street, now that they have

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>movements between the Fed and the Treasury. But I think

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that that once somebody leaves the Fed, um, you know,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>their I D doesn't work at the doors anymore. Uh,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they can't get ready access. So I don't think that's

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous issue. I think you know, clearly there was.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a very political appointment, uh to the to

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to have her participating in the in the federal reserve system.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think that that, you know, that

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>might actually be a little bit healthier in terms of

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>re establishing the the the political nature of the fat

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Bob same, Thank you so much with the MS pure Pint,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate your attendant's unclosed. Good, you have your good

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to be here here, David. My favorite tweet last night

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was from a woman. Well there was the one for

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Jason over at the Journal who said, my television just

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>threw itself out the window. Let's just go with that

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>thing now as we bringing Greg Greg Horizon Investments. Your

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>your notes have been absolutely fabulous. And to keep the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>base ball thing going, Mr Vlier, Mr Trump needed a

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>home run and he hit a double. Was it a

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>legit double off the wall or was it a ground

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>rule double in Yankee Stadium? Hi? Tim, good morning. Now.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a legit double. I think he

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>really energized his bass, which she had to do. They're

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going to turn out if it's windy and raining in Ohio.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>They're turning out, and I think you know he spoke

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. Did he add any new support? Well, that's

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the issue. I'm not sure he did. Let me bring

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it over to Secretary Clinton. The f T had a

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>great chart the other day of a certain blue collar

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>county in Ohio. She's got to get marginal voters with

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the weekend she had. Can she do that? Yeah? I

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think she can. I think that, uh, I would say

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend Trump had. You know, I'm not sure he's

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going to bring a lot of those voters either. You

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>know that if you step back just for a second

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and look at the forest rather than the trees, I mean,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the forest is there's been massive defections among Republicans who

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were really worried. Now they not only would lose the Senate,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but they might even lose the House as well. So

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got a really anxious party. I'm not sure one

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty good debate performance by Trump is going to change that. Greg,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the degree to which that tape,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which was released on on Friday afternoon published by The

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, played a role in this debate. I look

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>back on what happened last night, you can almost cut

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the debate into There was the first thirty minutes, which

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say ex very contentious, and it played a

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>major role there. This isn't something that Secretary Clint came

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>back to though at the end of the debate, a

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sigh of relief from the Trump campaign that this is

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>now at least in part behind him. What do you

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>make of how it played out in the debate? It's

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in part behind him, assuming there are no additional disclosures,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and I am not willing to make that prediction. I

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think that there could be more bombshells for both of them,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>with her from wiki leaks, with him with taxes. I'm

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure The New York Times has released all that

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they have, and of course with him and other women.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So we've got another month of this cringe inducing campaign

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to go, and I think there's going to be more disclosures.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the defections on the Republican side. What was

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it about this tape, about these comments in particular that

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>were so distasteful? Yes, the vulgarity, for sure. But but

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>there will be those who say this is nothing new.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We we we knew at least what Donald Trump was like,

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>if not what he is like. Why why did this

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>happen now? Well, I say two things. Number one, what

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>do you describe doing as a felony? Last time I checked?

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Number Two, I think that a lot of Republicans you said,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, he's talked about growing women. I think

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they're real concern, as I said earlier, is that they

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>could lose Congress. I mean they're looking at potentially a

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>really ugly election. I think that motivated a lot of

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the defections. Help me here, Greg, with with all that

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we've observed in the in the final twenty days of

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the election. There was a whisper of a moment last

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>night where Secretary Clinton shifted from the dance over to

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I will represent all Americans. And I turned to someone

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>who was watching the debate with and said, that's the

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>first moment where she's speaking to all the voters and

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the usual constituencies. Did you sense that or

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>does that wit? October nine? Yeah, yeah, I think Tom

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that in the last week or two, when you make

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>your closing pitch, the candidates usually get a lot more

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan tiid and cue the music. Better Angels, We're not

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not there yet. I think we got a waste

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to go before we hear that kind of talk. David

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to put it in the tweet I love last night

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>as Mr Velier speaks to the Better Angels. Was the

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>woman who said, look, it's like Game of Thrones. You

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>tell the kids go do something, you close the door,

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you turn a volume down, and you have your thumb

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the revote control if the kids come in the room.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what the beginning of the debate was like last night. Wondering,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>wondering what was going to happen. Greg talk about the

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>undecided nous in the room, I mean, it's it's it

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>seems this campaign has gone on for so long, many

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>many months. Now you have a room of undecided voters.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that the voters who were on stage with

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the two candidates didn't actually ask many questions. I think

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that the two candidates took a lot of care of

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the back and forth themselves here. But

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>how real is the undecided factor right now? I don't

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's that big anymore. Maybe there's still five of

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the electorate that could be swayed, but it's dwindling and

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. You know, one of the big takeaways

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from last night is that I'm not sure they moved

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the needle that much. You know, Trump again really rallied

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>his base. They're motivated to vote for him. But I

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think among these undecided there's one issue, if I might,

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>there's one issue that still has to be addressed, and

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's pro growth. I've been harping on this for a

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>long time. I think that her agenda more regulations and

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, more higher taxes, is not pro growth. I

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think if Trump realized that he could make some inroads there.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Does he have a campaign staff? I say this, folks,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, full disclosure. I was outside the

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump Tower yesterday and Greg, it was such a zoo

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>with a naked cowboy and the rest of it. We

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we went across the street and around it because we

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't want aerrabs to see it and and help me here.

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Does he have a cane pick campaign staff? Well, you

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the key states and you have

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the ground game. It's kind of our cane.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But those of us who are really into this wouldn't

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you that in a lot of key states like Florida,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he had a bunch of amateurs working for him, poorly funded,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>have never really worked on campaigns. Her ground game is

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>really good and in a close election that could be

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>worth half a point half half a half point, yeah,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>half a points important in a close state. There was

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a moment during the debate when my jaw dropped Martha

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>rat It's asking about Syria, and what emerged was a

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>real disconnect between one Donald Trump and one Mike Pence.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>She pointed out that they've said two different things about

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what the course of action should be in that country

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with regard to to Russia's participation. Uh. And Donald Trump

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>allowed that it was something that he and Mike Pence

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>had had not discussed this, I said, last hour, five

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>days in here, these two have been running mates and

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and is it how surprising is it to you here

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't something that's come up. I think it's

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, David. I mean, first of all, I

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>think over the weekend Pence was a gassed over that

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>tape and the sexual stuff. He's a conservative Christian and

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that Trump threw him under the bus last

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>night on Syria very dismissively. And currently so there's not

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot a lot of love between the two. There's

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been rumoring and Pence might leave the ticket. I don't

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>think he's going anywhere because if he endures this for

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>another month, he becomes one of the front runners. Well

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right where I wanted to go. In the final question,

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we have Mr Villiers, is Mr Pence and Mr Ryan

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and the others. Are they just positioning themselves for Greg

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Villiers New Hampshire primary to come. I think if you

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gave most of them truth sir, and they would tell

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you that They're all already thinking past the selection. They're

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the next one. Pence is going to be

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a player, Ryan Rubio, maybe Cruise. A big cast of

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>characters I think are secretly rooting for Trump to lose.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Great briefing, and I'm sure we'll have much more. Greg Villier,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>your notes are more than valuable. Folks. Again, we got

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>many emails, Mr. Vliers, paperwork we do. We protect the

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>copyright of all of our guests. Please contact Arizing Investments

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for the uh, the the chiseled granite slabs that Mr

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>puts out every moment. Who you put your trust in matters.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Investors have put their trust in independent registered investment advisors

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of four trillion dollars. Why they see

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>their role is to serve, not sell. That's why all

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>schwab is committed to the success of over seven thousand

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>independent financial advisors who passionately dedicate themselves to helping people

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>achieve their financial goals. Learn more and find your independent

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>advisor dot com. It is wonderful to pause now after

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the dropeth in gold of a week or so ago.

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>James Steele writes brilliant notes for HSBC on the bigger

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>picture on gold nut, the minutia of companies and all that,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but just the bigger view, James, it's Golden Week in

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>China and then China comes back. You notice a pulse

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of demand in India with all the ballet of China.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Is there a pulse to acquire gold in China? I

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think yes, There's been a considerable decline between when they

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>went on Golden Week and now. So merchants and traders

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as they have come back to their desks, uh, and

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>back to their businesses this morning, will have been greeted

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with a substantially lower gold price. And definitely those reacting

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>to the consumer demand will, I suspect, seek to purchase

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>bullion around these prices. That's not to say that the

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>washout is over, but I definitely think that the physical

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>demand in the Far East will will react to this. James,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what's the biggest driver of gold right now? Is it?

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it speculation about Fed policy? Is it the election?

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Where where are you seeing drivers of growth? Yes? I

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>would say it's the Fed policy angle, um, and that

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>feeds through into the currencies. A secondary but important one

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is uh, the election, and I think as we run

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.479
<v Speaker 1>up closer to the election that will be increasingly important. Uh.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to note that gold has been relatively a

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>new or two changes in the polls between Trump closing

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>on Hillary or Hillary opening up against Mr Trump. Gold

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to have reacted much to that. It's been

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>much more sensitive, however, to UH comments from officials at

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. I was looking at when Hillary Clinton

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gains in the polls. It seems like one month gold

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>volatility has fallen a little bit. What why do you

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think that is? When when when you see the lack

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, when you see the lack of movement with

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>regards is that surprising to you? I think any gain

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in the polls um for for for the leader would

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>probably tend to reduce the volatility because that would be

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>one less thing the market would would would be uncertain about.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I don't think. I think if it were

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>much closer, the vault would probably would probably be higher.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>James Steele, when I look at the chart, I know

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not a technical analyst, but UM, do you have

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the sense that gold has broken through support or is

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the rally still intact which nicely started the end of

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen. That's a good question. Um, it's taken

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a real dent. There's absolutely no doubt about that. We

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had quite significant technical selling when we got down to

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then again down around twelve fifty nine, the more

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>recent low. If you look at a rough retracement from

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the move around, say if you put

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it at ten in December, as you highlighted up to,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>say twelve thirteen seventy five, then that would be around

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve ten. And I think the market will hold well

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>well above that because yep, I don't mean I don't

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>mean it erupt, but I mean we go through to

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve fifty or twelve sixty in support is ten sixty?

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you look at this as a pullback and a

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>break of the James Steele rally, is it's known worldwide?

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Or do you look at this as we may we

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>may test that ten sixty level and as a gloom

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and doom crusee we migrate back to eight nine ounce.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, I don't think we will break down to

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>those levels, uh at all. I think monetary policy still

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>remains to loose. We have negative interest rates outside of

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the US and no real sign that that's going to

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to reverse. UM and Also, you know, the

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>fan rate rises are clearly well telegraphed, and uh, we're

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>only looking for very modest ones. So I think that

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>might be already somewhat digested into the absorb absorbed into

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the price. So no, I don't see a major um

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>decline of that of that magnitude. I see it's staying

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>well north of James. I look at the growth of

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>gold backed e t f s inflows, I think north

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seven billion dollars, and I wonder what effect

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that's having on the on the marketplace, how much that's

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>changed the the the contours of the gold marketplace right now.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been one of the most bullish. It's probably the

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>most bullish development on market wise that we've seen, um

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in years. Uh. It's absorbed a great deal of gold. Uh,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, without going into the merits of of of

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>an e t F necessarily, but it gives you a

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>good way to hold in store gold. But before people

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would tend to go to coins and small bars or

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>or equities, and this gives them, you know, an an

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>alternative this day if they choose to do so. And

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's built up considerably. UM. One of the things that's

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting I'm glad you mentioned the e T s because

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>although the net comics positions then net long COMICX positions

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have come down considerably with this, with this drop since

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the high of twelve, the ETFs have been very firm.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>James Steele with us and we've been getting tons of mail.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Is always on his gold call. James, you have to

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>live within the milieu of a major shop HSBC. And

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not that you love to make outlier calls. It

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>just happens to be where you guys are in Sterling now.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And on the duration of low yields, How does Steve

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Major's bond call low yields out to two thousand and

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one as far as I can see, how does

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it fold into your work on gold? Are you and

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr Major not in speaking terms? Oh? No, we certainly are.

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Now Now we try to be aware, well we are,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>we are, we are aware of of of everybody's views. UM.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We discuss things and his view about low rates going

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>further out, which have been you're gracious enough to say,

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have been UH correct of for for many, many many quarters.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Now UM is supportive of of the gold price, UH

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>without without doubt it lowers opportunity cost of owning gold.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It makes it easier to UH to own gold as

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a comparatively safe safe haven. UM. There's many positives that

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>low interest rate environment have for gold going forward, so

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it helps secure and gives us an economic and good

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>rationale for for our views on bullion. There's a looking

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at at at the dollar, the strength of the dollar,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted the degree to which that's a that's

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>effecting gold will continue to affect goal. What's your forecast

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of how the dollar relates to go on? Well, UM,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we do have the dollar weakening slightly to the euro

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>UH by year end. Recently it's it's it's been stronger.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So our currency view is usual to slightly supportive of

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of gold. UM. The big issue, of course has been

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the reaction of the pound, which has been down sharply.

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And and I think there's two ways to look at

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that for gold. Actually, because when you when we first

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>got the vote on Brexit, UM, the gold market jumped

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a jumped, not necessarily because of currency moves, but more

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the geopolitical risk associated with the the the

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>UK leaving the U. So in this case, although generally

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking a weaker pound would be a big negative for gold,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it might not be so much the case this time.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the interesting thing about the gold market is

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to balance many other things out, and although

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>currencies generally have the dominant impact on gold, you have

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at why the currency is moving as well.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>When you look at Brexit, when you look at the

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty over when that might take place, how how much

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of a complicating factor is that? Well? I think as

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>far as gold has concerned, a lot of it has

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>already been priced in. It was priced in very quickly

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with the rally. When when the vote, when the vote

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>came through, We'll have to see how how things progress.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But right now I think it's mostly in the gold market,

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and the gold market will tend now to look towards

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>fed E c B Bank of Japan policy frameforce elasticity

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>or responsiveness of jewelry. Two, the price of gold, I

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>mean an ounce of gold. How how tight is that?

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where again this is very interesting because it is

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>split pretty much in two halves. UM. Jewelry demand in

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the West does not appear to be incredibly price responsive UM,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly because it's a function of income. Higher incomes mean

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>more spending on luxury goods, and you don't tend to

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>see a big movement in jewelry demand either way. Because

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of price movements, it tends to be more related to

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>income and also to employment levels. Now in the Far East,

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>where a margin on jewelry is much much lower UM

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's less discretionary income, it's much more sensitive. And

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why, alluding back to earlier conversation, why

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we're probably going to see a nice physical response from

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese merchants when they as they as they get

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>going again after after Golden Weeks, they'll they'll be greeted

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with a substantially lower lower price. And the lower price

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>now is finally beginning to kick in and encourage Indian demand,

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which has been off the radar for many months, but

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come back, you suggesting, I do think

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>so moderately, um more more. I think the more of

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the growth will be in China, um the but the

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Indian demand I think will be up as well. The

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>month soon was good this uh this year, which might

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sound an odd thing to say, but a lot of

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gold is bought in the northern tribal belt and is

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon rural incomes and rule incomes in turn or

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>depend upon the harvest and the months soon go to harvest.

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>How maybe is this a naive question, James, when you

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about gold sales in China, how open a marketplace

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is that? How much government intervention is there in the

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>gold market in China? It's quite open. There have been

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>reforms that have taken the government out of that stemming

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>back years now. So it's a relatively open as far

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as as far as that's concerned, James, to congratulations again

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and killing the gold call here in the number of months,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the shift there is very important, as she

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>steals with HSBC is surveillance. I'm David Gurrow with Tom Keene.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan Governor Rohiko Kuroda sat down for an

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>interview with Bloomberg over the weekend and gave the clearest

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>signal yet that it may take longer than initially forecast

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for the BOJ to hit its two percent inflation target.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't I intend to exit from extremely accommodative expansion

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>already at this stage. We will continue or even strengthen

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>our monitor easing in coming months and years to achieve

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the presentive phrase one and the four the time being,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as I said eighteen US this podcast would would continue.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Croda also made it clear he'll continue to support a

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>strong stimulus program, responding to the idea of curbing monetary

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>easing with a laugh. We're joined now by Takatoshio, Professor

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of International Public Ferries at Columbia University. Professor, you know,

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you, first of all, just about what

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we heard from Governor Coroda over the weekend, both the

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Brookings and in this speech. You've read a note about

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the the inflation overshooting commitment, calling it epic making. Why

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the case? Yes, this, obviously in commitment is

0:33:55.520 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>amount to the what we call the price level anything

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in the little journ, which means that the Banqua commits

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to offset any dested in the price levels not achieving

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>two percent in the years after they tugged hit the

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>two percent targets. The two percent is now not the goal,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but the average of the two percent over the medium

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>term is two is the target. So this is very

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>strong commitment that the easing will continue. So by delaying

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the forecast of achieving two percent target dates, they supplemented it.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a very strong commitment on the afterwards, after

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting two percent, it's going to breaks to u to

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>upwards maybe three percent, maybe four percent. Professor, you know,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we have another delay, seemingly from the governor saying that

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this would not take effect until two wasn't eighteen. This

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is the fifth delay that we've seen. What do you

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the near constancy of these delays. Well,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's um a combinations factors. Some of them are beyond

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that US control. Mainly oil prices continue to be low

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and the domestic labor they're not demanding the wage increase,

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so consumption is so those are the miscalculations on miss podcast.

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But now we are seeing that oil prices are going

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>up and uh finally that I think a labor market

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in depend is almost full employment. So they they have

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>been a good post. Professor Rito. I'm sorry to remind

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you that it's been twenty six years since you crafted

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your must read book The Japanese Economy that at the

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>time all of us read cover to cover. You then

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>went on with Barry Ike Green and Charles White plots

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at international econom mix. Please explain to our

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>global audience as you were shortlisted for Mr Kuroda's job

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>please explain the independence of the Bank of Japan in

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>modern deflationary Japan. How independent is uh, mr Kuroda, It

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is very independent. I think um boj is as independent

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as whether reserve or easy bo of boe UM. I

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think all those four major central banks are now under pressure,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh the kewe and your interest rate or native

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rate, all of them seemed to have failed at

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>even to present very quickly. So now people are talking

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about the coordination between multiples and fiscal policy, which to

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>some people sounds like loosing independence. But I do not

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think that losing independence. I think it is uh, you know,

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>coordination all the equal to You took your doctorate at

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Harvard with Professor Blanchard Olivier Blanchard. He has been critical

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of modern macro economics and how we're going to do

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>economics forward. What would you like to see from the

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan in terms of a new strategy given

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the assault on so called dynamics stochastic general equilibrium theory,

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>what would what would you like to see out of

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>your Japan economics? Is your professor is critical of modern

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>macro Well, I'm sorry, I just got quotes from Yemen,

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not Olivia. About jobs. But data side, UM, I think

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics stochastic generic libum macro UH had not proved

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that they are relevant in analyzing the current situation, especially

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>for the analyzing global financial crisis of or eight or nine.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the DSc model that central banks do have

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but as one of three or four macro models so

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>UM UH DSD is very useful in amazing how the

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>individual sectors like helphold and corporations who the act to

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a policy changes UM that's more deep paramid long term

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>effect and they failed to analyze um, you know, very

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>short terms domino like h implement or under utilization of

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the resources and professortail. Thank you so much, taka Ito,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Columbia University from more Sina Heights of this morning here

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of course visited in the studio before a real honor

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to have him in after Friends and Laquas interview with

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Coroda. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene,

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 1>David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can always catch US worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Who you

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.800
<v Speaker 1>put your trust in matters. Investors have put their trust

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in independent registered investment advisors to the tune of four

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. Why learn more and find your independent advisor

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com.