WEBVTT - Like Leading A Sheep To A Trough

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty, I'm Strong

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and Getty and he Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Anybody that knows anything about the intelligence world knows that one.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>We're going to strip it completely down because the only

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>thing we need is the frame. The interior and the

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>electronics on a standard seven four seven will never work

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>for the Presidential Air Force one.

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 2>We have some air defense technology that doesn't come from Boeing.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of technology that's on there for

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the president to be connected, so it can be the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>White House in the air. No chance that anything inside

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 2>that plane stays inside that plane.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>If they strip it completely down to the frame, is

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>it then worth what it's worth? Is the big beautiful plane.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't have any idea.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know either. What would be the point of

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.639
<v Speaker 1>accepting a shell from Cutter and Engines, I guess?

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, any okay, all right, here is a WTF story.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Has WTF gone mainstream? I noticed the old guy on

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>sixty minutes used to Sunday Night.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that? Oh? Yeah, yeah? I think it

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>has to a large extent apparently. Anyway, here's a WTF story.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you see this?

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>The kind of crazy people, how crazy people can get

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>this Texas mom has been arrested. It looked like she

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>was attempting to supply her middle schooler with guns, ammo

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>and tactical gears so he could pull off a mass

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>violence episode at his school.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh lord, that is profoundly nuts. How insane is that?

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And I just saw the picture of her and she

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>looks completely greatly.

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow. They call yeah the wh is fairly popular to

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your iPhone, for instance, will auto fill that if you like.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>My youngest Delaney, age twenty five, decided she was swearing

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>too much, so uses heck in a lot. That's a

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>heck in good time, right.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 3>Trying to bring my kids down a little bit in there,

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>cursing my high schooler, particularly him and his friends.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know how it is. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>which is fun. I have it. It's a crutch. We

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>all have them. But I have friends who cannot express

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to you the time of day without an F bomb.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a I'm looking at it as a

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>practicing code switching. I know you and your high school

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 3>buddies talk like that so did mine. It's part of

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 3>a we're grown up or we're bonding or whatever you

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>got to do as a teenager.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We're dangerous, yes, but you have.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 3>To have that switch in your brain, that code switches

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>so that you don't talk the same way at the

0:02:58.800 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 3>dinner table.

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And right right, speaking of which I think you're absolutely right. Yeah,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I you know, it's funny. Especially earlier in our careers,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>friends and even family would ask, how do you remember

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not to swear on the air? I mean, because that

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>would be very bad, And I always said the same way,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember not to drop an F bomb and from

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>my grandmother.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or culture with your boss, depending on your boss

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>or whatever.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, it's actually remarkably easy, although I still, you know,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>will die on the Hill of bs ought to be

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>able to be set on the air, and some people have.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I mus don iMOS did a

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>handful of times, at least in New York.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna scream bulls at the top of your lungs

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>when you die, like Mel Gibson in Brave Art. You

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>want to say it so badly out loud, it'll be

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>my rosebud.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're a fan of classics, cinema. Yeah, bulls kind

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of overrated movies. It's a perfect yeah, I tell you what,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect word. I love it. Anyway. What were

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? Oh, I've got a couple of technology

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>studies a story speaking of code switching. You know, I

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>spent hours and hours yesterday deciding where Judy and I

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to stay in London when we go to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>London in August. Airb and be in it, which is

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>my preference. I'm not going to spend seven eight days

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in a hotel room. I just and I know I'll

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be out and about, but I like to find a

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>living room, a little kitchen in a little bedroom.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>And European hotel rooms are so freaking tiny, right, ridiculous?

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know I can afford a bit of

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>an airbnb with's a living room, as I said, So

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do it anyway. But committee, hello, committing

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to which one? I found so stressful? What do you

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>got going around and around and around? What's that? What

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if you got it wrong? What would happen? You can

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get you killed in your sleeper quoter? Now it'd be

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little noisier than the other one, or it's

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just five blocks to walk to Buckingham Parish instead of

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>three blocks or whatever, and I just I found it

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>too stressful. But anyway, I finally pulled the trigger and

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to it. But speaking of technology, yet another

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>one of these Do they run this quarterly? Is it

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of requirement warning issue to anyone using this

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>smiley face emoji to older people, not gen Z. A

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>smile face means you're conveying that you're happy. Yeah, but

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>gen Z he takes this grinning face to convey sarcasm

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>or irony. And then it has the inevitable twenty three

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>year old employee who says, at first I thought my

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>coarchers were being called and sarcastic to me, and then

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I realized when they said a thumbs up, they really

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>mean thumbs up because he is a sarcastically and the

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tone of the article is always therefore, you're you. Older

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people really ought to be careful in a finger and out.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>They should switch to the way we do it as

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>opposed the other way around. Yes, I would say to

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Hovey's at BESHI, twenty one year old intern, excuse me,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I run this place. I own this place. People like

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>me run the world. So you figured out.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>My son sends me the emoji with the tears streaming

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>down the face. Yes, at what seemed to me inappropriate times,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>So it clearly means something different to him as a.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Is he a sophomore or a freshman? This is early

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>high school. Did he seem to go to high school

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>last year? I don't remember.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a freshman anyway, the ass weapon cause

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 3>he's a freshman in high school. It seems to mean

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 3>something different to freshmen in high school than all the

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>other adults who ever send me the emoji with tears

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>streaming down the face.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, kay, Katie, you're not old and bitter. Well, don't

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>go that better.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>But several of my young her friends send me that,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 4>which usually would mean like you're crying legitimately, like you were.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Really touched by something, or you know my dog just died,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>or I heard about your mom or whatever.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it means something's hilarious now, like you're crying you're laughing.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Song Okay, that's what I kind of picked up on.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought this is highly inappropriate. Does this mean you're laughing?

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I cracked. You have a laughing till you're crying, right.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>They do. Yeah.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I cracked a joke to one of my girlfriends and

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>I sent her that and she sent me one of

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 4>those back, and I was like, did something just happen?

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong?

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Like, that's exactly that what I have. And I thought, oh, geez,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I hurt somebody's feelings.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exact same thing came over me. I was like,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 5>what did I do? No, that's just their laughing face.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Now are were talking about the tears streaming down? Yeah? See,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we used that in my family a lot. Like I

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the wordle so really upset.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but you're you're, you're, you're, you're being sarcastic about

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>how upset you are. Yes, exaggerating, but it's kind of

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the opposite meaning for my son. Okay, now I get it.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm laughing so hard, I'm crying even though they've got

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>one of those already.

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>My favorite texting story of all time, and it will

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>be for the rest of my life, was the woman

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>who said, I'm sorry I didn't get back to you.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>My mom just passed away, and her friend replied, lol,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking it meant lots of love to me. They no

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>longer speak and I'm l olling now is the ironic

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>concluded I'm sorry anyway. So to get like this, I

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like lol is.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Like charity laugh or you know what is that term

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>where you you laugh, you know somebody sympathy sympathy laugh

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 3>at this point and I and then I don't know

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 3>how to respond with a that actually is freaking funny.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I will. I don't know.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I usually write out because I don't use emoji's because

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm a grown up. I usually write out. I actually

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 3>laughed out loud at that. That was very like that much.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 3>If it's something really.

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Long tedious, you're such a boomer, or you just send

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 4>the word funny with zero punctuations, so you can't tell

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 4>if you're being serious or not.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I have done that. I will frequently respond ha, because

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I was laughing lots of oz. Yeah. So, but there's

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more linguists studying emojis emoji, I think I'm supposed to say,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Japanese all right. Have also pointed out that

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the symbols new meetings can often emerge from slang that

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>older users might not be aware of. For example, older

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>social media users might see the skull emoji as a

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>literal symbol of death or a sign that someone is

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>figuratively dead, isn't dead, tired or dead to me whatever.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But for the younger users, the skull is used to

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>say I'm dead, which means that they found something hilarious

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and have died laughing.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, the skull is that was really funny. I'm

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit somebody.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I can. I can think of people i'd hit with

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that today would be very confused, while the spark emoji

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is frequently someone being sarcastic about how something, how good

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>something is, and too much sarcasm. But here's the part

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I found really interesting. So I like, I send to like.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>If somebody says, hey, I got that promotion at work,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I respond with an eggplant and then sprays of water.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that the proper thing? Good lord? Yes, yes, do that? Yeah,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's perfect. Oh my god. Or if you give a

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>thumbs up and a sparkle, they'll think you're mocking them,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which is again, we run the world. We old people

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>run the world. You adapt us. But is your youngster

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>texting about cannabis, for instance, sometimes known as pot or marijuana,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the shamrock, the leaf, the maple leaf, the lemon, the grape,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the watermelon, the strawberry, the cherry, the pineapple, the dog face,

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the candy, the cake, the ice cream cone, and the

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>cookie can all be references to cannabis.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Because I understand it. The egg plant is the traditional

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.119
<v Speaker 3>vegetable of success, and so if somebody has some good news.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Keep believing that jack and use it frequently.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jack. These emoji can be references to cocaine, a rocket ship,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a fish, a gas pump, a snowman or a snowflake.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all sorts of drugs. Uh sexting. The peach which

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like God forgive me a woman's hind end, or

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the eggplant, the water you mentioned, or cherries. Let's see.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 4>I was embarrassingly baffled the other day when I got

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 4>a text message from a friend that said kiss my

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>and then there was a peach emoji, and I'm going, this,

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 4>my peach, What do you mean?

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I said, somebody with a cherries tattoo on them? What

0:11:58.200 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>does that mean?

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You, Katie? Is that a girl? What's that mean? A

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>woman's cherry?

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Cherries were trendy.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Late nineties early two thousands, but I don't know if

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 4>that is meaning.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>What was the message, delicious fruit? It was just a

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>cute package.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so okay, it didn't mean anything. All right, that's fine,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't need to.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We're looking it up. Oh.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Often associated with sensuality, feminine power, innocence, and use.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay. According to an Instagram post, that's a stupid tattoo.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't get that and if you haven't, get it removed?

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Coming up? Jack in a story related to the bullspit train,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the incredible theft that we were talking about earlier today.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't hear it, grab our three armstrong you

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>getty on demand from today? How did trial attorneys factor

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>into that? They're a huge factor. Nobody ever talks about this.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me started. He's going to get us started,

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>all of us. Stay tuned art.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 6>Today was former NFL tight end Rob Gronkowski's thirty sixth birthday.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 6>I can't believe you remembered sent his friends to him.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a probably guy h man And I didn't like that.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>You just point in the joke. Would you like another one? Yes? Well.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Speaking at the Saudi US investment for him this week,

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk said that the goal of his artificial intelligence

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 6>company XAI is to answer questions like, quote, where is

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 6>a universe going. Though for most people who use AI,

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 6>they to ask questions like what if a giraffe had boobs?

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Silly questions. In other words, yes, yes, I would agree. Boy.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I've continued to just love using chat GPT planning a

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>trip and just it's just so much better than what

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>came before it. Anyway, if you have a favorite, I

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>respect that too. I would like to get into groc Friends,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which comes via the Twitter machine, among others. So we've

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>been talking on and off today about the bullspit Train

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in cal Unicornia, which is one of the greatest thefts

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of taxpayer dollars in the history of the universe and

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the great failures of democracy and one thing

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that people don't talk about. And I'm not sure why exactly.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just a little less sooteric, little dry. Is

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the incredible power trial lawyers have in California in particular

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>wherever Democrats hold sway. In short, but the bullspit Train

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>has been the Enriching Lawyers Act of whenever it passed.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>In that there are so many eminent domain cases and

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>where the government takes your property but has to compensate

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you fairly. Between eminent domain and real environmental suits and

0:14:55.280 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>fake environmental suits, and labor disputes, and you know a

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dozen other things I can't think of. It has been

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>an incredible, just fire hose of money to trial attorneys.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Came across this from Caleb BArch in The National Review.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Due to the beneficial relationship try lawyers and their packs

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>share with democratic causes, most try lawsuits only back progressive issues.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Major trial lawyer packs have spent twenty nine million dollars

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last eight years, twenty nine million dollars on

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>political action committees and that sort of thing, ninety nine

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>percent of it to support Democratic candidates and committees. Since

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, ninety nine percent. The consumer advocacy group Alliance

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for Consumers revealed and report released Wednesday, AFC outlines the

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>web of federal political action committees funded by major trial lawyers,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>including they name a bunch that if you've not heard

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, you haven't heard of them all together. Since

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, these packs have put more than ten million

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars towards supporting Democratic candidates for the Senate, around eight

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>million more towards supporting Democratic candidates for the House, and

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>substantial sums to support other major progressive entities, and most

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>try lawyers supporting Democratic candidates and causes enjoy a positive

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>feedback loop. More regulations mean more tender for lucrative lawsuits,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and more Democrats in power mean more public contracts to

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>represent plaintiffs and said lucrative lawsuits.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why this fits in also, but as

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy who's dealt with divorce laws in California, the

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 3>lawyers get together and write laws to where you have

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to have lawyers to do things to get divorced, so

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 3>you have to hire more lawyers, and that seems to

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>happen more in blue states.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure people in the know could come up

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>with twenty different examples. But like the death penalty in California,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we still give the death penalty, but we never execute anybody,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So you get all the expense which goes to the

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>lawyers of a death penalty trial, and then all the

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>appeals and the rest of it's all designed to enrich them. Fantastic.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a happy note. What are you gonna do?

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty got a possible explanation for why Sean P.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Didy Combs is the guy he is. We've learned in

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a courtroom today trying to decide how to discuss this

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 3>on the air bit. But before we get to that,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 3>so I am going to read at least some of

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>that new Jake Tapper book about the Biden presidency that

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I unfortunately already paid for months ago before I decided

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 3>that I'm angry at Jake Tapper for lying to us

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 3>all these years.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Boy, and you're not a drunk, so you can't even

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>plead drunk purchase.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just thought it would be good for the show.

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I thought, man, there's gonna be stuff in there, and

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 3>it still might be. For instance, I've got one for

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 3>you here just a minute. But well, let's start with this.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 3>This is Jake Tapper finally copping to the fact that

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 3>maybe he didn't go as far as he should have

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and trying to dig into the president's mental health.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 7>I think some of the criticism is fair, to be

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 7>honest of me, certainly, I'm not going to speak for

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 7>anybody else, but knowing then what I know now, I

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 7>look back at my coverage during the Biden years, and

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 7>I did cover some of these issues, but not enough.

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 7>I look back on it with humility.

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Molly Hemingway tweets out that Jake Tapper hired a crisis

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 3>PR group that has repped Elizabeth Holmes, Jeffrey Tuban, Anthony Wieners,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>and others to teach him how to be nicer to

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 3>his critics during this thing. So they apparently, he and

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 3>the publisher apparently believe they're in such a bad spot

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>with the whole The British are coming, the British coming. Yeah,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 3>they're already here. What are you talking about.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's been talking about this for months. You don't get

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be Paul Revere on this, all right? Well, and

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>not only was he not Paul Revere, I mean he

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was like King George. He would I should have covered

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it more. Uh No, you forcefully defended the opposite point

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of view and belittled people who are trying to speak

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the plain truth. Right, So yeah, I get it. So

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they've gone from thinking, oh, this is going to be

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>an exciting book of revelations that will be praised on

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the aisle, now realizing, oh my god,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>we're a punchline to some people.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I'll be interested to see how it lands

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 3>when it comes out next week. It's possible it doesn't

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 3>make much noise when it comes out next week because

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 3>all the talking. But for instance, I'm a big fan

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>of Jonah Goldberger the Dispatch, though I do think he

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 3>actually has Trump derangement syndrome, which he would yell at

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>me for. He wrote a long piece yesterday about how

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Jake Tapper's being unfairly attacked, and Jake Tapper

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 3>did a good job of blah blah blah and this

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 3>and that and whatever. You work at CNN and you

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>guys are friends. Fine, yeah, fine. Jonah might be the

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>classic example of somebody I think is extremely bright, and

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 3>when I agree with them, I agree wholeheartedly.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But at least thirty to forty percent of the time,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a just I almost use an unfortunate term.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he is misguided.

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you really think in all those interviews where he

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>would tepidly bring up a poll number shows many voters

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think Joe Biden should be president again, and then

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 3>he credits that for really challenging the White House, he

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>would take their spin at face value and move on.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>When everybody in America was looking at Joe Biden on

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 3>a daily basis and saying that guy should not be president.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Jonah needs to maybe leave the elite

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>intellectual circles he's been running in for a lifetime and

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe hang out with some people whose hands get dirty

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at work for ten minutes. I think that would help.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Them any Jonah did say that he had read the

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 3>first five chapters of the book and it's really interesting,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 3>and I thought, okay, gool, maybe there is interesting stuff

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 3>in there, like this that came out yesterday from the

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Jake Tapper book about Joe Biden.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Some members of Biden's cabinet didn't.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Believe he could be relied on to perform at two

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>am during an emergency in the final year of his presidency,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 3>and that their access to him had dropped off considerably. Now,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I gotta believe that's some of the more major secretaries

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 3>that count, because I doubt some of the minor secretaries

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>had much access to him. Ever, so for it to

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>drop off considerably, that means you once had considerable contact.

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 3>So I I just wonder if it's not like some

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 3>of your you know, your secretaries of State, you know,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 3>your secretary's of Defense, that sort of thing, that maybe

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 3>their access dropped off quite a bit. And thought I

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know if he could handle an emergency if he

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 3>shows up. And as you pointed out earlier, two am,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>how about noon on any given day, based on the

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>way he sometimes was, and all the times they canceled meetings,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>That's what Mark Alpern was talking about. Said, all the

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>times that they would just out of nowhere counsel a

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 3>meeting that he was supposed to have it one in

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that was? Yeah, yeah, well there was.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>There is no question that he was. Biden was completely

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hidden from anybody but the inner circle, the inner inner

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>circle by the end.

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And so mentioned this earlier in the show, I'm trying

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 3>to change my I wish America would change their their

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 3>thinking on this from I'm angry at Jake Tapper to hey,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 3>secretary of State or sect deaf or whoever the heck

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>you secretaries were. Didn't you need to come and tell

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>us if you didn't think the president of the United

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>States could handle a crisis, shouldn't you be telling this this?

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>You kept it a secret so you could stay in

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 3>your job, maybe maybe for a whole nother term.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>If he won, which yeah, there's a hell of a

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. Of course, dang it. There had to

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be times.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if anybody ever admitted out loud, there

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>had to be times where the Secretary of State Anthony

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Blincoln thought, if China fired on Taiwan right now, I

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>would have to make the decision.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, I'm sure he'd thought that because I can't

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>talk to the president well, and let's face it, not

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to get off the topic, but Biden is a wishy washy.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We better not equivocator back when he was sharp, right,

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know. And then one of you good brilliant

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>folks pointed out via text, I think it was that,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the cabinet looked at the alternative Kamala

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Harris and her in her circle and thought, we're better

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>off with Biden when he's cogent and his circle of

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>advisors than that moron and her her half with team.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is his sec deaf? For some reason, that out

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of my head, right, Lincoln, Oh sect deaf? I'm sorry? Uh,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>who's Biden's Secretary defense? Shouting it at the radio? Lloyd Austin?

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, So yeah, I'll bet Blincoln and Austin thought, if

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 3>we have to will handle it.

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.959
<v Speaker 1>It would be better us than whoever Comma chooses. Lloyd,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen him for a week and a half.

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any idea where he is? No, I don't.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought you did, Austin and.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 3>In his very low voice, oh incredibly, Okay, here's a

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 3>p Diddy update, Katie. Do you have the details on this?

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Hanson said it during the commercials. Joe hasn't heard this yet.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Where did this? Where did this come from? This come

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 3>from a different trial? Where'd you say it came from Hanson?

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 5>He won't, Tom, it's there.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 4>There was a separate case that involved another woman that

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 4>he had had sexual relations with.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so here's the story. I'll relay it as you were,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 3>as you told it to me in uh. In a

0:24:55.760 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 3>different case, this woman had testified that when Sean Combs

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>was forcing himself upon her, she became aware of how

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 3>tiny he was and thought, oh good, at least it

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 3>won't physically damage me that much, which might be And

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm not just saying this for selacious reasons. People are

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 3>immediately thinking, would she describe it as a Tutsi role?

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's what really set him off when she called

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 4>it a Tutsi role, that.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 3>That might be where the psychology comes from of how

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 3>he has to be this incredibly dominant and abusive to women.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Wow, the tutsi roll doctrine wasn't Weinstein in the

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>similar situation, Michael, does that sound familiar?

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes? I God, that's disgusting and maybe somewhat understandable, but no,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>get over it or something.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>To understand something is not to condone it. Yeah wow, okay, wow,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's why he had to be the dominant sex

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>god ringmaster make up for the his tutsi roll them situation? Katie,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Why is your microphone off right now?

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Because what am I supposed to say to your tutsi roldrom?

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Hey guys, if you ever think you're having a bad day,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 4>you can always look back and go Nobody has ever

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 4>called me a tutsi role.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't know that. You don't know that. Yeah wow,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I almost said something truly unfortunate. This is finally developed

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>restraint late in life.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Venturio's girlfriend, who's on the stand right now and

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 3>being cross examined before we take a break, testified that

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>she occasionally watched him have sex with other women, and

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>that happened at least two or four times. That is

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 3>his defense lawyers trying to make that argument that they're swingers.

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 3>We go both directions, all kinds of different directions. It's

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 3>just a bunch of adult swinging. That's not a crime.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 3>That's what they're trying to get to there.

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Right right. When it comes to the specifics of sex trafficking,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that won't matter. But one other thing. And look, I'm

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not a professional obviously, defense attorney, but I've known them,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I've studied them, I've read about them, and I've been

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on some juries. There are a certain number of jurors who,

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if you take the Russian propaganda approach, the ultimate goal

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of Soviet now Russian propaganda, a lot

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of it is to convince you of something in particular,

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it is to make you feel

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like you have no idea what is true, and there's

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>no way to figure it out, so you despair from

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>keeping from seeking the truth. Well, some defense techniques in

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a trial is just to have the jurors so confused

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they think I got all sorts of doubts, never mind

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable baue. I don't know who to believe, I

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on. I've lost track of who

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is force and who and what does sex trafficking mean?

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 3>And again right then you throw in a dash of

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 3>she got twenty million dollars, and I think you could

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 3>say whatever.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's impossible to do for a variety of reasons,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ethical and practical. But I wish there was some sort

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of authoritative book. Maybe there is, come to think of it,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet there is. I'm sorry, I'm just having a

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation with myself. But the question watching that, the question

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of why jurors vote to a quit for bad reasons.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see some sort of statistical study

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on like ten to two juries, for instance, nine to three,

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or even more overwhelming ten to two to eleven to

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one reasons. Is it like the Twelve Angry Men one

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>brave iconoclast Gregory Peck? I think standing up for real

0:28:58.840 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 1>justices he season.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I seldom think that's probably what's going on there. It's

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the one everybody's like slapping their forehead. What do you

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 3>mean you still don't feel like they're guilty?

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Or is it soft heads unable to think critically

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who are swayed by the defense attorney just confusing.

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Something eyes It makes me think he couldn't do that

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing.

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Ah right, Yeah, I was the one jury I was on.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>There was one woman who was just a nice young

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gal in her twenties, but I felt for her because

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>life is always going to be hard. She was just dumb.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>She was really not smart. There was one gal who's

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a half wit who had these weird

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>beliefs that she would speak in the jury room and

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd all be like looking at each other, like I

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how to begin arguing with that.

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 3>His ring fingers longer and his index finger and those

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>people tend not to be rapist, so.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff like that, stuff like that. And then there are

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one gal who just was so devoid of life experience.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>She you know, I won't get into the details. I've

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>told the stories before, but and that was on a

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>single jury. I think twenty five percent of the jury

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was It was like leading a sheep to the trough

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to what a sheep eat. I don't even know sheeap food. Clearly,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to get them to a reasonable verdict was like

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to herd.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Cattle, very much like leading his sheep to the trough,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the old sheep trough.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>We finished strong.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Next time, I just came across this. I don't know

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 3>what CBS News reporter, but I just saw this CBS

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 3>News reporter says Wall Street Journals twenty twenty four report

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 3>on Biden's decline should have won the Pulitzer Prize. Remember

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>when the Wall Street Journal did that big piece he

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 3>got just got swammed. I think that's the one where

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Joe Scarborough lost his mind and.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 8>Said a few if you don't think this is the

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 8>best version of you know, I think that was over

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 8>the Wall Street Journal thing, and this CBS reporter I'll

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 8>have to dig up who that actually was, says the

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 8>Wall Street Journal should have won the Pulitzer for that.

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Why because they said what should have been obvious. But anyway,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>well they broke from the cowardly cowardly pack. Yeah, that

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem that admirable to me.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 3>No, I think I have time to properly describe this.

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe by tomorrow we'll have the oral arguments in from

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>today's Supreme Court dust up over not just birthright citizenship

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that's the topic, but this system we've got where one

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 3>judge can hold everything up.

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that working force or not? Yeah? I read a

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>blow by blow description and it was about three quarters

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the way through the oral arguments. The reporter said, they've

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>only touched on the birthright citizenship thing in past, so

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the big issue. Yeah, the issue is can a

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>single federal judge issue of nationwide injunction anytime they want?

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, Tim Sander for our friend, he said, the arguments

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>against this system typically boiled down to let the government

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 3>keep acting illegally until the Supreme Court rules.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And he said that's just not a good idea. That

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is where you'd be.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And it takes a long time, as we all know,

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>for things to work their way up to the Supreme Court.

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are levels of the judiciary between those, but

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I confess I'm curious to hear people learned, people suggest solutions.

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Gentlemen's Final Fults manifest with Armstrong and Getty. I see

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know your judo. Well, here's your host for final thoughts,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Getty. Let's get a succulent Chinese meal of final

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts now from everybody on the crew. Michael Angelo pressing

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the buttons. What's your final thought, Michael, Well, my self

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>esteem took a hit today when Jack said that lol

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a sympathy laugh.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 5>I get a lot of lols in response to my jokes.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So anyway doesn't mean it always is. I feel like

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it is when I get one or when I give one. Yeah,

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I generally mostly sometimes Here Katie Green are esteemed Newswoman.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>As a final thought, Katie.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 4>I am joining forty five thousand other people watching this

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 4>eagle cam and it is bringing me joy regularly.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It makes you happy? Makes you happy? Jack a final

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>thought for if something's.

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Really funny, I reply with a holy crap, that's funny

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 3>or something like that, because I want to make sure

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't just think it's a excuse me.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Lol. Yeah, here's your fascining. My final thought is you're fascinating.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Bald eagle. Fact of the day. The juvenile bald egle

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is bigger than mom and dad.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I've noticed that.

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>What it's it's partly I think they're feathers. Their plumage

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>makes them look huge as defense.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we usually bigger than shrink.

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, we'll see bald eagles semi regularly in South

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and the junior The juveniles look like some god awful,

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>enormous burden. You're like, what is that until you realize, Yeah,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a baby bald eagle. Yeah, learned something. Every day

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>women are bigger than men too in the bald eagle community.

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Can't wait to apply this knowledge in my everyday life.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Are not trans eagles regular men in woman eagles.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong in getting wrapping up another grueling four hour workday.

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So many people to think, so little time go to Armstrong,

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>getdi dot com. We got holings, we got Katie's corner,

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we got swag, gay do pick up one of the

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>light hoodies the perfect weight, take my TUTSI roll out

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of here. See tomorrow. God bless her America. I'm strong

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and get you what a personal privilege? That didn't make

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't, so it'll do my Uh okay, so

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 3>let's go out with a bang, shoot down.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a woman. Now, I'm a woman. Did you hear that? God,

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you are not a fetching broad? That was a little blunt.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty well good. Everyone should on that high note.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks you all very much, Armstrong and Getty