1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:09,239 Speaker 2: Scotte Besson's of K Square Group joins us around the 3 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:10,960 Speaker 2: table for more. Why do you consider to be a 4 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:14,400 Speaker 2: potential Treasury Secretary? Pick Scock And morning, sir, good morning, 5 00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:16,439 Speaker 2: thanks for coming in. Thank you very much for being 6 00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 2: with us. Let's stop with an easy one. Why do 7 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 2: you think that one is a bad idea? We're capital 8 00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:24,120 Speaker 2: gains tax? Well, the capital gains tax. Look, Kamala Harris 9 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:27,440 Speaker 2: is an economic illiterate. Donald Trump is going to give 10 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 2: an extensive speech at the Economic Club of New York today. 11 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 2: He's going to take questions. She's reading from a teleprompter, 12 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 2: and you know, let's just review here. 13 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:39,560 Speaker 3: The capital gains tax will be after a proposed tax 14 00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 3: on unrealized capital gains, which, in the scheme of the 15 00:00:44,720 --> 00:00:47,600 Speaker 3: new taxes, has to be one of the worst tax 16 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:49,240 Speaker 3: ideas in thirty years. 17 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:52,920 Speaker 2: Let's talk about how the former president, perhaps future president 18 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 2: might count to that. What are his policies. 19 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 3: Well, I think you're going to hear from President Trump today. 20 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 3: You are going to hear you a warning that the 21 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 3: Harris Biden administration caused a great inflation. Vice President Harris 22 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 3: was the tiebreaking vote on both spending bills that led 23 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:19,560 Speaker 3: to the inflation, the inappropriately named Inflation Reduction Act and 24 00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 3: the American Rescue Plan. They would not have passed without 25 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:25,800 Speaker 3: her signatures. I'm still not sure that she knew what 26 00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:29,080 Speaker 3: she signed, but she did sign it. And you know, 27 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:32,399 Speaker 3: all these policies that she's talking about now, you know, 28 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:36,040 Speaker 3: are going to ignite inflation again because what happened last 29 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 3: time was we got a demand shock from government spending 30 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:43,440 Speaker 3: that was met with high levels of regulation, and that's 31 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 3: the recipe for inflation. And Trump one point zero. We 32 00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 3: got a demand shock from the private sector, fueled by 33 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 3: the tax cuts, and that was met with deregulation, and 34 00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 3: that's why we had non inflationary growth. President Trump's going 35 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 3: to talk about that. He's going to talk about energy dominance. 36 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:06,680 Speaker 3: He's going to talk about not only stopping the inflation rate, 37 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 3: but getting prices down, which I think is very important 38 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,320 Speaker 3: for the American household. You know, we're in an affordability crisis, 39 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,799 Speaker 3: and he's going to address getting the deficit down. I mean, 40 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 3: we are at seven percent peacetime non recessionary deficits. And 41 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:27,440 Speaker 3: it is clear now, you know, I think I said 42 00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 3: it last time. When I was here. I've been saying 43 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:33,000 Speaker 3: it for about two months that the economy is slowing dramatically. 44 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 4: Scott, how do you get the deficit down when if 45 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:38,840 Speaker 4: you look at Trump's policy proposals floating a corporate tax 46 00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 4: rate of fifteen percent, campaign is also excluding Social Security 47 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:48,040 Speaker 4: payments from taxes, exempting tax on tipped wages, also increasing 48 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:50,600 Speaker 4: the child tax credit. All of this is going to 49 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:54,560 Speaker 4: add to the deficit plus Travis with Some economists will 50 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 4: say is inflationary. 51 00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:02,359 Speaker 3: Well, let's unpack that there there would be income from 52 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,120 Speaker 3: the tariffs, so that's a big number. 53 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,000 Speaker 4: Well, that's debatable though, that's just going to be passed 54 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:09,959 Speaker 4: on to consumers. 55 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 3: Well, all taxes that are passed on the consumers. And 56 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:18,080 Speaker 3: I think what's interesting about taxes is they aren't necessarily inflationary. 57 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 3: They're one time administrative price adjustment. Historically forty to fifty 58 00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 3: percent of any upward enmpulse is reflected in the currency. 59 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 3: So that would all set it. Then we have the 60 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:40,960 Speaker 3: various preferences by consumers. It could end up in foreign manufacturers' margins. 61 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:45,160 Speaker 3: Their margins could go down, so and you know their elasticities. 62 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 3: Consumer behavior can change, but in terms of getting the 63 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 3: death sit down. I have been talking about it before. 64 00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 3: I think we would freeze domestic programs except for defense. 65 00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 3: If you look at the Paris Biden proposals, and she 66 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 3: hasn't walked this back yet, maybe she will. They're calling 67 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 3: for a twenty one percent decrease in defense spending. I 68 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 3: can't imagine a worse time to do it. The only 69 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:17,599 Speaker 3: thing that I believe, and again I don't speak for 70 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 3: the campaign, but the only thing that I believe that 71 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:27,720 Speaker 3: should have a real increases is defense. The Inflation Reduction 72 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:33,320 Speaker 3: Act is the doomsday machine for the deficits. It was 73 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 3: originally scored at a positive score. It was supposed to 74 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:41,359 Speaker 3: be positive fifty billion, then it went to three hundred billion. 75 00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 3: It's probably going to be a trillion this year, and 76 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 3: it's now estimated over the life of this thing that 77 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 3: it could be a four and a half trillion hole 78 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:49,840 Speaker 3: in the deficits. 79 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 1: So hold on a second. Does that mean that you 80 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,719 Speaker 1: expect Donald Trump to try to unwind it, put a 81 00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: halt to it, okay, but not unwinded. 82 00:04:57,279 --> 00:05:00,599 Speaker 3: Well, I'm not sure what unwine means. I mean, you're 83 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,839 Speaker 3: not going to level the eight charging stations that we 84 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:04,479 Speaker 3: got for eight billion dollars. 85 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 1: I guess here's the question, and this is the reason 86 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:09,279 Speaker 1: why you had the Congressional Budget Office come out saying 87 00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: that Donald Trump's proposals will actually increase the deficit more 88 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 1: than Kamala Harris's. We had a story on Bloomberg talking 89 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 1: about how potentially Donald Trump's proposal could increase the collective 90 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 1: costs as much as a ten and a half trillion 91 00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,919 Speaker 1: dollars over the next decade. I mean, how do you 92 00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 1: offset that? 93 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 3: Well, first of all, and you all know that Bloomberg 94 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 3: is one of my favorite venues. But I do have 95 00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,360 Speaker 3: to say that that story yesterday in the ten and 96 00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:40,880 Speaker 3: a half Trillion was poorly written, poorly edited, and compared 97 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:45,840 Speaker 3: apple st oranges. The ten and a half trillion was 98 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 3: everything Donald Trump and Jade Evance have ever said, and 99 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,520 Speaker 3: they took it to the highest end. Then they took 100 00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:56,000 Speaker 3: a score from the Wharton School and said, well, this 101 00:05:56,279 --> 00:06:00,840 Speaker 3: is the Harris budget or the Biden Harris budget. It's 102 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:03,919 Speaker 3: apples and oranges. If we were to take everything the 103 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:09,000 Speaker 3: Vice President Harris, including what she said in Raleigh, twenty 104 00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 3: five thousand dollars or twenty five thousand dollars for housing, 105 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:19,600 Speaker 3: including for new arrivals, that would be substantially in excess. 106 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 4: But the Democrats and Biden's budget now and Kamala Harris 107 00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:27,280 Speaker 4: is part of the administration, have revenue increases. Where are 108 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:32,400 Speaker 4: the revenue increases to offset all of these tax cuts 109 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:33,800 Speaker 4: that Trump is talking about. 110 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:36,440 Speaker 3: Well, look, I think they are paid for us here. 111 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 3: So it's the cut spending. We do not have emory. 112 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 3: We do not have a revenue problem in this country. 113 00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 3: We have a spending problem. So traditionally the government revenues, 114 00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:52,440 Speaker 3: federal government revenues are seventeen and a half to nineteen 115 00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 3: percent of GDP. We're right there now. Since two thousand, 116 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,760 Speaker 3: we've averaged about a three percent budget deficits, so spending 117 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:08,800 Speaker 3: has been twenty one twenty two percent. This administration, led 118 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 3: by Vice President Harris, has blown out the spending. We're 119 00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 3: at a seven percent budget deficit right now. And what 120 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 3: do we have to show for it. We had job 121 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:23,400 Speaker 3: we had the employment numbers revised down by eight hundred 122 00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 3: or nine hundred thousand jobs. We had two hundred and 123 00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 3: fifty thousand private sector jobs. So the idea here is 124 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 3: what we have seen with Paris Biden. It's what's called 125 00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:39,720 Speaker 3: in Grand Prix driving two footed driving. You've got one 126 00:07:39,720 --> 00:07:43,120 Speaker 3: foot on the accelerator, the FED is putting one foot 127 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 3: on the brake. 128 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 2: Scot, forgive me because I've got ten seconds left that 129 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 2: I don't want to cut you off, So just stick around. 130 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 2: Scott Besson's of Keysquak Group from New York. This is Bloomberg. 131 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 2: Typically we talked to Scott beston a Keysquak group a 132 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,600 Speaker 2: lot about politics, given his potential to be the next 133 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:00,120 Speaker 2: Treasury secretary. Score We've also got to talk about what's 134 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 2: happening in this market because you've got positions in it. 135 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 2: I know that you've been long Gold, You've been long 136 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,240 Speaker 2: the Japanese yen. Are you keeping those positions? 137 00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 3: I am, and thanks for focusing on my day job. 138 00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:12,400 Speaker 3: You know, I think in the Japanese yen it's an 139 00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:15,880 Speaker 3: extraordinary opportunity because as central banks around the rest of 140 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:21,559 Speaker 3: the world are an easing cycle, Japan for the first 141 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 3: time in almost two decades, is in a hiking cycle. 142 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:28,560 Speaker 3: So you know, we'll see if they're like sokatas they 143 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:31,720 Speaker 3: only come out once every seventeen years, or whether this 144 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:36,960 Speaker 3: turns into a real hiking cycle. My thought is that 145 00:08:37,160 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 3: there is the potential for this to keep going, So. 146 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:41,320 Speaker 2: You want to keep riding this trade. We're at one 147 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:43,880 Speaker 2: forty now, we were pushing through one sixty previously. What 148 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 2: kind of numbers have you got in mind? Well, it's 149 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:49,200 Speaker 2: two sides to this. 150 00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 3: Japan is strengthening inflationary impulses picking up. The other side is, 151 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:01,720 Speaker 3: as I've said, the US. I believe the US economy, 152 00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 3: I said it recently is buckling, and we're starting to 153 00:09:05,400 --> 00:09:07,120 Speaker 3: see it in the numbers. I think we're going to 154 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:13,200 Speaker 3: it's both industrial numbers and labor. And I think what's 155 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:16,200 Speaker 3: funny here on the Democratic side of the aisle, and 156 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 3: I will put politics back in for a minute. They've 157 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 3: been screaming for a rate cut all year now. You know, 158 00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:26,200 Speaker 3: even Claudia sam who's been chewing off her arms since 159 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:28,920 Speaker 3: February for a rate cut, doesn't want to come out 160 00:09:28,960 --> 00:09:31,280 Speaker 3: and say, well, my rule got triggered. And anytime my 161 00:09:31,360 --> 00:09:34,199 Speaker 3: rule gets triggered, we're in a recession. So they don't 162 00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:36,600 Speaker 3: want to use the R word before November fifth. 163 00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:38,880 Speaker 2: So the longdon Nippon steel way, it's the cheaper this 164 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 2: still gets right essentially for them? 165 00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:48,439 Speaker 3: Well, yes, exactly is they may have, through some terrible 166 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:52,200 Speaker 3: timing get a better price. We'll see what happens. 167 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:54,600 Speaker 2: Wak me through what you think should happen, and let's 168 00:09:54,600 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 2: finish there. Harris says she wants to block the deal. 169 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 2: Ban is given the signal he wants to block the 170 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:00,599 Speaker 2: deal the form of price, and it's given us the 171 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 2: second he wants to block the deal. The company has 172 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 2: come out to the Wall Street Journal in the last 173 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 2: twenty four ans and say, if you block the deal, 174 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 2: job losses are on the table. We're going to be 175 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 2: moving out of Pittsburgh. How do you recalibrate the policy 176 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:13,640 Speaker 2: now with that in mind. 177 00:10:14,520 --> 00:10:17,480 Speaker 3: Well, I think we've seen and it was very surprising 178 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:20,920 Speaker 3: because I've been going to Japan since nineteen eighty nine 179 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 3: and Japanese companies traditionally have a very high regard for 180 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:29,600 Speaker 3: all stakeholders. I remember the first time I went and 181 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:31,880 Speaker 3: you talking about shareholder value and they said, oh, no, 182 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 3: you know, Bess and Son. We have our customers, we 183 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,239 Speaker 3: have our employees, we have our banks, we have our community, 184 00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 3: and the shareholders are last. And now you know, they 185 00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 3: reverse that. They're putting shareholders first. And I was surprised 186 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:49,360 Speaker 3: to see a Japanese company that didn't check in with 187 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:52,439 Speaker 3: the US stakeholders. They didn't check in with the community, 188 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:55,960 Speaker 3: they didn't check in with the unions, they didn't check 189 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:56,680 Speaker 3: in with the customer. 190 00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 2: That's the mistake the mascot. And this is where we are. 191 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:00,160 Speaker 2: And now we've got to deal with the police. See 192 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:02,120 Speaker 2: on the campaign trail. Are we going to offer them 193 00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:04,520 Speaker 2: state aid? How do we keep this company in business 194 00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 2: in a way that doesn't end up with job losses? 195 00:11:06,520 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 3: Well, look, I think that the you know, maybe the 196 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:16,120 Speaker 3: deal will be resurrected. Cleveland Clips actually forced Nippon Steel's 197 00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 3: hand with their bids, so maybe a domestic buyer will 198 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:21,000 Speaker 3: come back. 199 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 2: You don't see space for state aid. Sorry, you don't 200 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:25,280 Speaker 2: see space for state eight. 201 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:27,280 Speaker 3: Well, I don't see why we need it right now 202 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 3: is what we did state aid with Intel, and Intel 203 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:35,160 Speaker 3: just laid off fifteen thousand employees. The stocks down sixty 204 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:36,840 Speaker 3: percent this year, and they're probably going to be pushed 205 00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 3: out of the Dow. 206 00:11:38,520 --> 00:11:40,400 Speaker 2: They got their own problems. Scott, it's good to see you. 207 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:42,680 Speaker 2: It's nice to touch on markets too. Yeah, let's do 208 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:45,080 Speaker 2: that again next time I go into a key Square group. 209 00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 2: We like your day job. Too, Thank you, sir,