WEBVTT - Ether ETFs Are Looking for a Bitcoin Style Love

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Trains.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Belchiernis.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>There's been this wildly successful launch of Bitcoin ETFs this year.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Eric and the industry just couldn't get enough. They're back

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 2>for more, never enough with this. What's going on? What's

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 2>going on?

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 4>So they filed for Ethereum ETFs after filing for Bitcoin ETFs.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Fast forward, after the Bitcoin ETFs launched, there was sort

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 4>of a surprise approval from the SEC that the E

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 4>three ETFs will be approved and they just launched about

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 4>a week ago, and it's sort of, in my opinion,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 4>like the opening band following the headliner. So it was

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 4>definitely interesting, but not quite the impact and import I

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 4>think of Bitcoin, which is just way bigger across the board.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 4>But again, as an analyst who've been studying this stuff

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 4>for twenty years, I really enjoy the horse race. It

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>was another horse race where you had all of them

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 4>lined up at once, you could like really get some

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>interesting data compared to Bitcoin, compared to a regular launch,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 4>compared to each other. Also, Ether is different than Bitcoin,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 4>so there's definitely a lot to unpack. But you know,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>a little less intense than the Bitcoin launch.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>You know what I can't wait to talk about is

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 2>you didn't think this was going to happen.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 4>I didn't. There's an ongoing debate on why it happened.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Some people thought Gary Ginsler all along thought he would

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 4>approve this, but didn't want to give any signals to

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the issuers because he didn't want to have a circus

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 4>like the bitcoin, you know, approval process. On the flip side,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 4>some people thought that the politics had shifted, and Biden

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>told Gensler, hey, let's lighten up on crypto a little.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Let these out so we don't appeal appear to be

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>that anti crypto. I don't know which is true. They

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 4>both have decent evidence behind them, but we don't actually know.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>All we know is about a week before we had

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>heard they're going to approve them, and they did.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm also really excited to bring on Stacy Marie Ishmael,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>who's at an executive editor at Bloomberg News overseeing crypto,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>digital payments and cross assets. That also means she oldersees

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>ETF coverage Peptinberg News. She's a longtime collaborator of mine

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>in the newsroom. Looking forward to having her on her

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>first episode of Trillions, this time on Trillions Ether ETFs

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Stace Marie Wecome on Trillians.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what is Ether?

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Just starting with the softball questions.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly what is Ether? How is it different than Bitcoin?

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say the distinguishing factor of Ether, which Ether

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fans may not like, is that it's significantly smaller than Bitcoin.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I heard Eric called it small potatoes.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I am not going to say that Ether are small potatoes.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I am going to say that on the merits it

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>is the second largest cryptocurrency after Bitcoin, and the gap

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>between the largest and the second largest is very large.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Right where the way that folks think about Ether is

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily that it's a Bitcoin replacement, but that it

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>does very different things.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's like, actually, how it's built and how it operates,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>everything about it is actually pretty distinct and different, pretty

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>distinct then bitcoin? Can you can you explain some of that?

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, if you care about these distinctions, one of

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the very first ones that you'll point to is the

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>way that bitcoin is created is something called proof of work.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So a bunch of you know, energy intensive data centers

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>switched on all day solving mathematical problems. You've heard the

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Shpiel Ether is maintained and kept in existence by a

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>totally different methodology called proof of steak, which is still maths,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>still complex, but not something we necessarily need to go into.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But the main thing that ether fans will point to

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the energy consumption of maintaining the Ether network

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is significantly less than that of bitcoin.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>If you want to go down a rabbit hole, you

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>can go read a lot more about all of this.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And let me jump in here too, because I'm a

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 4>tourist of the planet crypto. I'm an ETF guy who basically, yeah, yeah,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 4>I've got an English to Crypto conversion dictionary that I've

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>used a lot. It's worn out, basically, but I've read

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 4>a couple of books, and one thing that struck me

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 4>and I started to understand this whole thing a little more.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Is bitcoins sort of a reaction to the dollar devaluing.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like, hey, if you want to store value in

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 4>something because the dollar loses valuation, and hey, government's print money.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 4>It's just it's very politically expedient to print money if

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 4>you have a problem, and so hey, there's this thing

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 4>that can help protect you from that. Ether is not

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 4>about security or currency. It's like, let's do another Internet

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 4>that is completely decentralized and like a couple tech companies

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 4>can't control. So I do think some of the ethos

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 4>is the same, that sort of populous like, hey, things

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 4>are too centralized government, big tech. I do find that's

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 4>one common thread between the two. They're very different, and

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the way they're pitched this different, and I think even

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>the way they operate is very different.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>So why does the world need an ether ETF let

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>alone mini ether ETF.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Look, if you want to invest in all this action

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>and creativity that's happening in this decentralized platform, ether is

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>sort of the gasoline that runs it. So some people

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 4>call digital oil. So again, if you want access that

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 4>is frictiony to go do that yourself. ETFs kill all

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 4>the friction. So that's why the world needs ETFs in general,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 4>is they're friction killers. That said, do you need ether?

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 4>And that's the question people have to ask themselves personally.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of normal investors sixty forty they

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 4>might buy the bitcoin ETF and be like, I'm good,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of like you buy gold, you don't buy silver too.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 4>Probably what's going to happen, and then there will be

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 4>some people who are sold in the ether story, but

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that's going to be a minority of the

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of bigger crypto PI station. Y.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 2>What's the vibe inin like this year? Because it feels

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>like this thing that was really the wild West has

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>started to get tamed.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that no regulator would say that

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they think that crypto has been tamed and that everyone

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is now following all the rules that they would like

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>them to follow. But certainly as it relates to the

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ETF portion of the crypto market, which is still relatively small. Right,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the overall market capitalization, market value, whatever you want

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to use of the entire crypto market globally is about

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>one point five trillion dollars, and we are not quite

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of the direct comparison with crypto based ETFs.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But you do have this feeling that now, if you

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>are a pension fund or some other highly regulated institutional investor,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you can get access either to as Eric put it,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know the bitcoin element of crypto, or you

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can say, well, I'm actually interested in this idea of

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a separate Internet, this computational underpilling, this programmable theory. I'll

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>invest in ether or you just want to diversify away

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>from bitcoin.

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 4>When we think about investing through an ETF in this

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 4>and you're now the Ether people, they're all in. That's

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 4>why when I did refer to a small potatoes, I

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 4>got attacked for like three weeks straight on Twitter. I

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 4>still still remind me that was a little dismissive. I

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>do think opening act a headliner is a little fair.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>But the idea of where do you put this in

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>a portfolio outside of hardcore ether people who are all in,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 4>most people are going to like one percent and we're

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 4>talking like and I think Bitcoin and Ether to me

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 4>are part of a larger category formally known as hot sauce.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 4>So you know, thematic investing, single stock investing. This is

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 4>stuff to just have a little fun with. Yeah, just

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 4>in case stroll these people are right and this stuff

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 4>goes to a million. I don't want to kick myself.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that thought alone is going to power a

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of flows, even if they don't even totally understand it.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 4>People are looking to cure future fomo now and they

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 4>have as portion of the portfolio that they set aside

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 4>for that kind of stuff. But it's not I don't

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>see like this taking over anybody's core.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>And you used to have to use a digital wallet

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and now you just use your insert whatever platform you want.

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 4>But this is interesting because the hardcore people are like,

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, not your keys, not your coins, and they're like,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 4>do we really want Larry Fink to have all the bitcoin?

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 4>And he doesn't really own it? But I see what

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 4>they're saying because like, let's say the government wanted to

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 4>confiscate all the bitcoin, Obviously Blackbrock's probably going to comply

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 4>with that, and that does kind of kill the whole ethos.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>So the hardcore people have mixed feelings on this. Yes,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>number go up, but on the flip side, a lot

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 4>more cryptos moving into the traditional finance hands.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think to that point about fomo, you know,

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're now having a conversation with your financial advisor,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who maybe a year or two years ago might have

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>just stared at you blankly if you said, how do

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I get exposure to crypto? There's more people who have

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a way in. Whether those folks ever end up owning

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a Coinbase wallet is a totally different question.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 4>And a lot of the crypto people they want the

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 4>ETF to be like a gateway drug. And then they

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>go set up a coinbase account. Then they go and

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 4>get a hard wallet, cold cold wallet, and then they

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 4>won restore in the backyard and like bury it. And

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>these are the steps to becoming like the full the

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 4>full crypto, ye person.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.239
<v Speaker 2>But full crypto when you got it in the backyard.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>But one thing on advisors and people having conversation with advisors,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I do think seeing Larry Fink right, he's the head

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 4>of the largest asset manager, a lot of these advisors

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 4>use other I shares products, Fidelity, They've been around since

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the eighties. I mean, these are massive trusted brands. I

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 4>think that gives advisors some cover. Now it's almost like, well,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 4>it's now, it's mainstream, the SEC approved it, Larry Fink

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 4>says it's okay. Before they didn't have any of that,

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 4>let alone the friction of trying to get it, so

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 4>that I think is underrated. Point is having that cover

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of like it's now in an I shares brand. You

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>can't really get upset with me. I just put you

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 4>in an I Shar's ETF. It's not like I went

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 4>out and got this crazy thing. We found that advisors

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 4>really gravitate towards big brand ETFs, I shares, Vanguard, State Street.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>They feel comfortable like you can't really fire them for that.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 4>It's like buying IBM in the eighties. So I just

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of cover has been given here for

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 4>those wealth managers.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Stays Marie. What was this horse race to get ETF

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>approval like for Ether? I mean, we spent a lot

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of time talking about the Bitcoin one. There's all kinds

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of back and forth with the SEC. What was it

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>like this time and who were the players that you

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>all were watching?

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think to Eric's point, the main thing that

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we were keeping an eye on is if the roughly

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>same universe of people who got into issuing these you know,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin ETFs would do so for Ether, and you know

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the filings landed and we're like, yep, pretty much the

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>same people, right, because they already had the infrastructure, they

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>had already gone through all of the hoops with the

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>approval process the SEC. The first time they knew the

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>forms they had to fill in, they knew that they

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>would have to fill in those forms fifty more times

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and make revisions. Hey the lawyers again, pay the lawyers again,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>out to lawyers, always making money on every financial product.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that they also figured that they would

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>probably have a customer base that had been primed by

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the existence of these Bitcoin ETFs to say, hey, if

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you're interested in that, you might be also interested in

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this thing. To me, though, the only real surprise has

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>been the absence of an immediate flurry of people trying

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to launch other types of token based ETFs, because you know,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the infinite optimism of crypto is such that you see

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this other thing happen and you're like, Okay, we're going

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to do this. And really we've seen a couple of

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>attempts at Solana, which is, you know, not even the

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>third rank token but also but still a very popular one.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But the prospects for that are much lower than they

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>were for either Bitcoin or ether.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we wrote about the Solana ETF. We feel like

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 4>it's just basically like a call option in case Trump

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 4>wins White House, because let's say he pointed like a

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 4>libertarian commissioner like hester Purse.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Anything could happen if Harris wins or at that point

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>we wrote it was bid him.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 4>But if the current administration kind of continues, and even

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 4>if it's not Gensler and it's somebody Gensler two point zero,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 4>it's not going to happen.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 3>And a big thing that they've kind.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 4>Of like used legally is that there's no futures contracts

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>currently and the only two coins they've approved have futures trading.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 4>It's a long story, but that was really behind the

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Greyscale lawsuit which sparked all this to begin with. So

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 4>no future is no coin, but that's just the SEC's interpretation.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Now you get a new SEC in there, anything's possible.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying it'll prove it, but certainly now it's

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 4>more of a I would say, the odds go up.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Why did you originally think that this ether ETF moment

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going to happen?

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Because Genzler had come out and indirectly just thought it

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 4>was a security And this is trying to get through

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a nineteen thirty three Act, which was for commodities. So

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 4>if you approve this, you're sort of ipso facto saying

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>it's a commodity. And I don't think I still don't

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>think he thinks that he wasn't really clear that's one thing.

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 4>The other was there was no grey scale lawsuit here.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 4>The gray scale lawsuit was only on bitcoin. Now you

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 4>could say that the threat of a lawsuit would happen

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 4>if they denied it, but there wasn't an actual lawsuit.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 4>So we just thought Gensler. And when the bitcointf got approved,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Gensler's letter was pretty pretty much like I hate that

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I had to do this.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Don't look for any other ones. He was pretty upset.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>You could tell he was feisty, and he felt he

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 4>had to do it almost by like gunpoint, and I

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 4>was like, all right, I just don't think it's gonna happen.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>So there was a variety of reasons that we were

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 4>like pretty bearish on him.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And what was the moment that you realized it was

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>game on?

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, there was chatter ped the issuers and their lawyers

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 4>starts saying, hey, we just got notified from the SEC.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 4>And this is like a week before in the bitcoin process,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 4>people were hearing back from the SEC on like hey,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>tweak this or answer this question.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>This is called comments. Ninety five days before approval.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 4>We were in day ten to like we were ten

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 4>days left and I hadn't heard anything, So we're like,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 4>there's just no way anyway. With a week left, it

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 4>was like what oh, So it was a shocker. And

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 4>that's where the political side comes in because if you

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 4>trace it, but a week before that, that's when Trump

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 4>said I'm the crypto guy. If you want crypto, vote

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 4>for me. And then there was a couple other little

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 4>political things. Mark Cuban came out and said, hey, Democrats,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 4>you're you're gonna this issue is going to really hurt

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 4>you more than you think. So even moderate Democrats were like, hey,

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 4>please don't let them have this issue. And I can't

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>say that those things contribute to I don't know, but

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 4>certainly the circumstantial evidence does point to maybe a little

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 4>bit of a political inspiration to change their tune on.

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 3>This stays me.

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Where about a weekend at trading? What have we learned

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>so far?

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>People don't like fees is the main takeaway. If you

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened with the bitcoin ETFs, there was

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a higher priced premium offering in the markets, and then

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody else was like, what about zero percent? Do you

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like zero percent? And that very much has been the

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>case with the ether ets and.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>The bitcoin ones. It's just like even before launched, they

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>were in a price war. Yeah, all right, so what's

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that look like on the ether side?

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Very similar. We have, you know, folks saying it'll be

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>zero percent for six months or until we get this

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of inflows. We have people saying, well, we're not

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to cut our fees to zero, but we

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>will launch a smaller version, a mini that has a

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>more attractive fee structure. You know, you get kind of

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like this bargain basement feel to it, where people are like, well,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how is this thing different from that thing? Mostly I

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>trust these three big names. Mostly they're kind of around

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the same pricing. So I'm just gonna go with wherever

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I have an account as long as that's the cheapest

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>option for me.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 4>This fee war is really intense. If you look around

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the world, an ether or bitcoinspot etf is one to

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 4>two percent. So for these guys to come out and

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 4>be like the base fee, forget the waiver, We'll go

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 4>over that mint. The base fee is between fifteen and

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty five basis points, so we're talking five six times

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 4>cheaper than the rest of the world or a hedge fund.

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 4>This is why the US market sucks all the money

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 4>and jol it's very powerful. Plus you add liquidity and

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 4>this is irresistible stuff. And then the waivers, so all

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of them, but like two have a waiver. I'm waiting

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 4>for free steak knives. Actually I'm holding out for a

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 4>time X watch or something, and then I'm going to

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 4>buy that one for a year, six months?

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Does it come like, do you get an ether steak

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>knife and a bitcoin steak knife?

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Combine them? Yeah? Buy both?

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and you get maybe or I don't know,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 4>a monthly subscription to a magazine.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>But walk through the way that these waivers work. We

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>don't usually see this, but we did see them.

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>With the bitcoin, you'd be like a waiver for six

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 4>months or if the ETF hits two billion, whatever of

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 4>those two things happen first. So they're just trying to

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 4>get fish tho. Yeah, they're trying to get people.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>And here's why.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 4>When you're in a race against ten or nine other issuers,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the first couple of weeks are crucial. We report on

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 4>who's winning and losing. Everybody is and if you don't

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 4>have any assets or volume to begin with, you start

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 4>to have a stank on you, and advisors tend to

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 4>gravitate towards around the ones that are liquid. It's like

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 4>a party you want to go where people are not

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 4>to the one no one's at right, so they know

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 4>how important the first couple of weeks are to getting

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that like winning mojo going. And that's why I think

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 4>they all did it because the.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Coin based custodian fee.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 4>They all use coinbased except for like one or two

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 4>is I heard between like nine and twelve basis points

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 4>something like that, So they're only making like six to

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 4>seven that is razor thin, and that's before any fee.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 4>This is starting gate stuff, so it is intense. I

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 4>was a little shocked. I thought we'd be forty to

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 4>sixty to start and then we'd you know, have fee

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 4>wars over the next couple of years.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 3>But where I thought we'd be at after like two

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>or three years and we're in one week?

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Well I guess that speaks to the power

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of what the ETF can do though, right, Like if

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you put this thing in a wrapper, it's going to

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 2>drive down the price and everything's going to be you know,

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 2>basically transparent.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, the whole thing's very ironic because, in my opinion,

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 4>especially black Rock and fidelity. They're both looking for Vanguard

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 4>free zones in which to operate so they can make

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 4>more money because they both have to continue to make money,

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 4>especially Blackrock that it's a publicly traded stock, so they're

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 4>like almost like an oil driller looking for new forms

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 4>of oil. And they were like, Wow, this is something.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>We can do.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 4>But to go to those fees, it's almost as if

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 4>Vanguard Vanguard's spirit was there even though they weren't. And

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 4>so ironically there's not a ton of revenue here. But

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 4>I think what they're thinking of is long term, let's

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 4>get customers in. We'll bring them in here and then

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe something down the road we can charge more on.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's just get the people, and this is something we

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 4>can do that Vanguard clearly.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Wants no part of a gale in other words, scale.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's walk through who the players are and maybe

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>even what distinguishes their offerings. If it's clear yet Blackrock

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>ran away with the bitcoin game, how are they looking

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>so far?

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So they're leading.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 4>If we're doing a horse ray so flows after about

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>a week Blackrock four hundred and forty million. It's about

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 4>double number two, which is about a tie between bitwise

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 4>and Fidelity bit wise punching above their weight. They're indie,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>but they're real into crypto. They're like hardcore crypto people.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 4>So for them to compete with Fidelity up right off

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the bat's pretty good. Gray scales minim as a one

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 4>sixty four flows. That's a good sign for them. If

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 4>they didn't get any money in that being the cheapest,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 4>that would tell us their brand is really tarnish. But

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess they're doing okay. And then Vanak, Franklin and

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 4>Vesco are a little bringing up the rear a little bit.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 4>But even like taking Vesco fifteen million, that would be

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 4>in like the top ten percent if you took all

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 4>new launches over a course of a year. If you

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 4>get fifteen million within the first week, that's like top.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Five ten percent. Yeah, put it on the board.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's like one of the last ones on

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 4>the list here. So these are really strong numbers. They

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 4>just pale compared to Bitcoin. But if you remove Bitcoin

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 4>volume wise, these were some of the best launches in

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 4>the past year. In fact, the black Rock traded like

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and sixty million, that's double any of the

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 4>launch of the past five fifteen.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 3>You got to move bitcoin.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Though, put bitcoin back in. These all move down the list, right,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 4>But what distinguishes in them? Black Rock would say, you

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 4>know brand, you trust us whatever?

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 4>Bitwise would be like, we're actually crypto people, We're not

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 4>like opportunists like those Wall Street guys.

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Gray Scale would say that.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Gray Scale would say that that's I think that's the two.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Can It sounds so similar to the exact same thing

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we heard when the bitcoin launch has happened, right, It's

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 2>like us are them? Right? What else jumps out to you?

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 2>Taysom Marie about who's in this mix so far and

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>how they're attempting to distinguish themselves.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>To Eric's point, it's really the do you want crypto

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>native or do you want like trad fi full service?

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And that is very much, you know, to your point

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about how is the market changing? That's kind of where

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going much more broadly, right. It's the folks who

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are like, the path forward is how close to trad

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>fight can we get? And then there are folks who

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are like how far away from them those people can

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we be? And I will be really interested to see

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>whether the expectation that ETFs bring in people to crypto

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>who weren't in crypto before. There's another version of that,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>which is ETFs bringing people to traditional financial products who

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>weren't in those products before because they're like, oh, I

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>want everything to do with crypto. Previously I didn't care

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at all about ETFs, but you know, let me add

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>this to my wallet buried in my backyard or in

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>my air gapter room or whatever portfolio.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, I was speaking to somebody at that event in France,

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 4>all crypto people. I was again like, I feel like

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 4>it turists, and one person was saying, and this is

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 4>I won't say who it is, but they're actually really hardcore.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 4>But they're like in my four to one K and

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 4>these other there's certain accounts I cannot hold a cold wallet.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 3>So even some of the hardcore.

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 4>People, I have some ETF exposure because it fits in

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 4>the plumbing exactly of everything, whereas a cold wallet is

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 4>really totally outside the system.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I think. One thing also is messaging.

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 4>You know you talk about where the crypto people bit

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 4>wise has this commercial ad series. It's like remember the

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Mac guyack in the day, Justin Long was paired against

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 4>that dork and it was like Mac versus PC, which

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 4>is really.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>John Hodgman was the dork. I think, yeah, yeah, it.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Was really Steve Jobs versus Bill Gates. Let's be like

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 4>but anyway, they did that for the Ether rollout. So

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 4>there's the Ether guy who's like this sort of regular

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 4>cool looking dude or whatever. And then there's like mister

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 4>wall Street and like he only trades like not, you know,

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 4>nine point thirty to four every day, whereas Ether it's

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 4>they have a couple of sketches, pretty good. Matt Hogan

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 4>of Bitwise says this, if you own the cues and

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 4>you don't own eth, you're missing part of the technology sector.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 4>So that's a pretty strong pitch Blackrock. They say Bitcoin's

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 4>appeal is in it's scarcity. Ether's appeal is in its utility.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 4>You could think of Ether as a global platform for

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 4>applications that run without decentralized intermediaries. And Blackrocks messaging and

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Jay Jacobs, who's just perfected that some people even think

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 4>he's AI. He's that good. It's like they speak fluent

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 4>boomer you know what I mean. So they've taken crypto

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 4>and converted into boomeries perfectly. So if you want to

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 4>just go dig around Black Rock's website, and you'd be like, yeah,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 4>this seems legit.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you outsting yourself as a boomer?

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 4>They call me a boomer's next technically, but compare to

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 4>crypto people, I'm definitely a boomer.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So looking ahead, how many more crypto ETFs are

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>we going to see?

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I think on top of the existing products, you know

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>people have already come out with ooh, let's add leverage.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a bunch of prospectuses without let's go short,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>so let's go double long, let's combine some things. Just

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as a reminder, there's a lot of other different kinds

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of crypto ETFs. Theyre ETFs comprised of like publicly traded

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>mining stocks, et cetera. But the biggest thing that will

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>determine what's next is who's in the White House in November,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>because that the regulatory environment. To Eric's points, who is

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be the SEC chair, what is

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be the approach of the SEC see and

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the regulator's overall is the main thing that everyone in

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the market is waiting to see.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Eric, assuming the White House that is the same, not much,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>I think to Stacy's point, it's gonna be a lot

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 4>of spaghetti being thrown the wall around ether and bitcoin

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 4>like you know, long ether short bitcoin, ether plus bitcoin,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 4>ether plus bitcoin equal.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 3>Weighted market cap weighted covered call.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's basically gonna be like all kinds of stuff,

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 4>and I'm telling you one or two of these will

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 4>be a huge hitule I've seen it. So they're gonna

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 4>try everything and anything. Because the assets in the collective

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.479
<v Speaker 4>unit is already something like seventy two billion.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a good chunk of change. Remember ESG they threw.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 4>All kinds of products out that was only one hundred billion,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 4>so we're already close to where that was, so I

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of get the product rush.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 3>This is what the ETF industry does. A lot of

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 3>this stuff will just.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Be roadkill eventually, but a couple of these will make

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 4>it and serve a purpose, and you know, we'll see,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think again the White House would have

0:24:58.720 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to change.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Then we can talk about other.

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Co Who do you think wins the ether race? When

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 2>will we note what the finish line looks like?

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 4>We predicted black Rock and Fidelity is favorite simply because

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the bitcoin race. Ibit is the GLD of bitcoin. I mean,

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 4>it's it's a done deal. It's not just the assets,

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 4>it's it's the volume.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 3>And it took like what six weeks for that didn't

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 3>take long.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 4>The volume is also underrated. Whoever gets the volume gets

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 4>the institutions. Largely speaking, institutions love liquidity. It's the one

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 4>thing that they get everything in the world for free

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 4>because they have a lot of money. But what the

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 4>one thing they can't get from an asset manager is

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 4>is liquidity. And certain ETFs have that liquidity. That's why

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 4>they like SPY and GLD, even if they're a little

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 4>more expensive. So I bit is that I think eth which,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 4>by the way, this is the first ticker that makes

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 4>you speak like A with a northern acct eth anyway,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I've that's a first, but ETHA is probably going to

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 4>be the GLD of ether. I would assume that said

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>everybody can eat here. Some of these at the bottom

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 4>are legit, decent hits for a regular ETF.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 2>And what are those tickers like?

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 4>For example, c eth is twenty one shares q eth

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 4>is in Vesco. On the bitcoin front, I think BTCW

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 4>is the wisdom tree, So I think that one's the

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 4>last one of the bitcoin and I think it's over

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 4>one hundred million already, which again, if if any new

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 4>ETF came out at one hundred million in seven months,

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 4>you'd be like, that's a hit. So they're all gonna

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 4>make it. I think now once we get to these

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 4>crazy spaghetti at the Wall ones, some of those will not.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 4>But I think the core ones here are are all

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 4>gonna survive long term. But I think you gotta go

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 4>with black Rocks probably be in the the winner if

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 4>there was one.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Stace Marie, one final question, since it's your first

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>time on the botto, what is your favorite ETF ticker.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Spy?

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Because when I was a kid, I was super into

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>like Matilda and you know, anything just like espionage a jacent.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely not a spy now, but I know that's

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>something a spy I would say.

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Okay, I love that. I think that's the first

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>time anybody's actually just said, like, elephant in the room,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the biggest one is the one I'm gonna talk about.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a clever ticker.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 4>I think the only the spy kids. I think one

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of them might have used it, but that was it. Yeah,

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 4>spies usually maybe most people pick like some of the

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 4>more crazy ones.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's a good that's a good.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 2>One say to me. Thanks so much for joining us

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>on trance. Thank you