WEBVTT - White Sox Road Woes Continue in Detroit

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Howard. I'm so glad I saved your number.

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 2>My husband Phil at a construction site.

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 3>It is in critical condition and I knew it wasn't safe.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm very sorry to hear that. I just want to

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 4>let you know I'm here to help.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, tell me more about it.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Work injuries not only affect the victim, but also everyone

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 4>around them. Inc Lawn, Chicago based here to advocate on

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 4>your behalf with over one hundred attorneys and staff. If

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 4>you or somebody you know has questions about a work

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 4>injury called three one two six million injury law made Personal.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 4>That's aake in law.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 5>From your favorite source for Chicago White Sox talk, delivering news, interviews,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 5>analysis and more. This is The Sox Machine podcast with

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 5>your hosts Jim Margolis, James Began, and Josh Nelson.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Here. Everyone, welcome to the Sox Machine.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm your host, Josh Nelson, and it's Sunday, June twenty first,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six as we record this episode, it's Father's Day.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So to all the dads out there, we all hope

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that you had a wonderful Father's Day.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 6>The Chicago White Sox did not have a.

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Good weekend as they were swept in the three game

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 3>series against the Tigers. Our show Rundown for this episode

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox road Wares. We'll be talking about just

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the difficulties have been having away from rape Field, bull

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>bend concerns again as Sir Anthony Domingus again cannot lock

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>up the save, where's the offense? And review the Big

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 3>American League Central series against the Cleveland Guardians. First, let's

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>talk about the Chicago White Sox road wares as they

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>are fifteen to twenty five away from rape Field. Here's

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Chicago White Sox manager Will Vennable addressing those issues the

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>White Sox are facing.

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at everything.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's part of what we do on a

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>daily basis is you know, what is it that we

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>can do better to support this group today?

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And that you know includes when we're at home too.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, there's not been a thing that we've

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 2>been able to put our finger on to you know,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>explain the difference. You know, for me, I think that

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you know in forty plus game sample that you know,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams you know, are sub five hundred

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on the road, and certainly we have a big disparity

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 2>in our record. I think it speaks as much to

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 2>our home advantage and our fans coming out and supporting

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>us in the way that our players respond to our

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 2>home fans as much as anything else.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 6>So we'll figure it out.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>These guys, you know, continue to put themselves in good

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 2>spots to half chances to win. We just got to

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>do a little more on the road.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Joining me on the Sox Machine podcast is Sox Machines

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Managing editor. It's Jim Margulus And before we get started, Jim,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 3>Happy Father's Day.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 6>Did you have a good Father's Day?

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Solo dating this week. Uh. So, it's a lot

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of fothering. It's uh, it's good. It's a lot easier

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to do it when he's four versus three. Here there's

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>some stuff he can do by himself, more friends to

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>play with, so it's less handholding, less crying, less of

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the terrible threes, which are terrible twos don't exist as

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>far as I'm concerned. Two was fine, three was miserable.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Four there's a little bit more reason to go along,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of here's our plan, and we're

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave this place peacefully before we show up, right,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna remember that you agreed to leave peacefully without

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>screaming when the fun is over, that sort of thing.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's it's it's good, it's it's yeah.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Three was tough.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Well to all the dads again. Happy Father's Day, Jim.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>The White Sox did not have a good weekend in Detroit.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>As I mentioned in the intro, their dads and the

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>road rows are continuing to pick up like this is

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>now becoming a serious topic, and I guess, or our

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>expectations coming to the season, it shouldn't be a surprise,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>but now that our expectations have been changing mid season,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox have now lost seven straight road series.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>They are now fifteen and twenty five on the road,

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and you've already played half of your road games this year.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 6>If you double that number, you're.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>On base to be twenty games below five hundred on

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the road, which means that you have to be just

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 3>as good or even better at home, which they have been.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>That's why they still have a winning record. Will Venable,

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess, based on what we just heard from in

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>the intro, he's trying to find an answer as far

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>as is there a better process that we should be

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 3>doing to play better on the road. But what do

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 3>you make of the White Sox road ros to start

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 3>this season.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They're weird because they're not what you would expect, Like

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I would think if the White Sox were beat on

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the road, it's because they're not hitting on the road,

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they're a little two reliant on the offense

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>hitting homers at home and those cheap or wind aided

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fly balls to right field don't carry the same kind

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of like the Kaufman Stadium problems of just going to

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a bigger park or a park with less friendly corners,

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, they have to sequence plate appearances better,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to defend better, and they're just not doing that.

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, like they're hitting actually better on

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the road, Like that's not necessarily the problem. So that's

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the first place I looked, And that's not the issue.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>They are, you know, at least of late they're playing

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>decent teams on the road, or you have good teams

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Yankees and Phillies, like that's you know, and

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.119
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to figure out this new like White Sox.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>But then they lost, you know, a series against the Twins.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>They lost the series against the Giants, so like, it's

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been longer running than that. The one number that

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>jumped out to me, like the pitching is the big disparity,

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's confusing, just because you would that if

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pitching staff, it's that can give if the homer would

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble, they'd have problems at home as much

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>as they would in the road. But actually they're pitching

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>better at home. So like, the one thing I wonder

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is looking at the babbit batting average on balls and

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>play forty points higher on the road. So I'm curious,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that could be luck. That could be you know,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a small sample. It's less than half a season

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>divided into half seasons, so it's it can be a

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit wonky. But part of me wondered, if you

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have younger players and perhaps this outfield that's been kind

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of a mishmash all year, does it change the way

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they're defending, does it change the way they're positioned to

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>where the pitching staff is not getting its usual support. Yeah,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I looked at this just out of curiosity, see if

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a weird right field thing. Now, the batting

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>average on balls and play is pretty even for hitting

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox batters home and away, but on

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the he ha's like two sixty AT's home, it's three

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>oh seven on the road for batting average balls and

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>play a lot more hits, a lot more longer at bats.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So that could not Yeah, maybe it's not defense, but

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be you know, who knows, like just you know,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>besides luck, it could be pitchers being perhaps because they're trailing,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they put in their front in the bullpen, or they

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have starters or eating it just because they have to

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>get an inning where you know they're not. You normally

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have them in if they are leading, and so

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just games get away from them because they're already trailing

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and you don't use your better pittures while trailing. It

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>could be just a simple matter of that. But if

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for like something more concrete or something I'll

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be paying attention to just to see like is there

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>anything there. That's one thing that jumped out to me,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just with maybe outs not being converted and just because

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the pitching staff isn't elite, you know, it's still young,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>still uneven. Yeah, we're watching guys go through first full seasons. Uh,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>could be a case where you know, it's it's just noise.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But maybe they need you know, great defense or all

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense the White Sox can provide them, and when

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't, it gets kind of hairy. That's really like

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a theory all throughout there. Not necessarily what I believe,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but something I noticed and can think of some moments

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of flashing before my eyes of just like, yeah,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the defense, maybe uh wasn't that great so or there

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was some miscommunication in the gaps by the walls, et cetera.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it could also just be a noise from

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>lesser pitchers being used.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 3>With the whole bab up stat like three oho seven

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>seems to be closer to normal. Jim, the two sixty

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>at home, that's a surprising number to me. Like I

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 3>fear regression to the mean would be coming for the

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>White Sox pitchers at home.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>It could be you know, I have to look at it,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but it could be a case where just rate field

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>being a smaller field, harder to drop hits in. Okay,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I buy that. Yeah, Like you know, some like Corus

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Field because the outfield's massive, that's why the batting average

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is so inflated. But with rate field being uh, you know, symmetrical,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>being no weird gaps to cover and the alleys are

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty small, like it's bad park for triples. Also, you know,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not a great park for batting, average, great park for homer's,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>great park, or a good park for offense overall because

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the homers. But if you're not hitting homers, then

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a little harder to especially as defenses get better,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>positioning gets better, harder to really just get those hits

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>when you need a hit.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So other than the annoyance of not being confident anymore,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>when the White Sox on the road, it's like, what

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 3>an amazing week four and one against the Atlanta Braves

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>in Los Angeles, Dodgers, Wow, turn that around one in

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>five against the Yanke He's and Todd getting swept by

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers after not getting swept by the Yankees is

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 3>very disappointing. And if you didn't get a chance to

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 3>watch the series. The opening game, the White Sox actually

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>had a lead against Derek Scuolball. I know everyone pays

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>attention to the verbal spat that was going on between

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 3>school bull and injured pitcher slash clubhouse wizard Mike Vassel,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>but the White Sox had a three to two lead,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Tristan Peters made a defensive blunder. Tigers end up winning

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that game board at three. That's a disappointing loss. The

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 3>next day, Sam Antonaci had the lead off homer.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 6>That's it.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty much the extend of the offense. The White

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Sox lost four to one, and then on Sunday. This

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>leads into the bullpen concerns because Davis Martin I thought

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Jim had a nice bounce back start. Sure, the strikeout

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 3>to walk rate not great. I think he had four

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts to three walks. He did have to deal with

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>some traffic, but he only allowed one run over six

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>innings on seventy seven pitches and a two run lead

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>for Ryan Hudson, Grant Taylor, and Sir Antony Dominguz. Those

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 3>are the three best relievers Jim that Will Venable has

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 6>Hudson did his job.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>But Grant Taylor again allowed another home run, and Sir

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Domingus he got the first two guys out, but

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>then he stumbles, allows an infield single and then things

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>just start coming apart again on Sir Antony Dominguez. So

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>with Grant Taylor and Siranty Domingez kind of having really

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>rough outings the last couple of times have been out there.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you have concerns with Grant Taylor and Sir Antony Dominguz.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Have I think a case where Dimingas is somebody who's

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the ceiling of setup. Man As somebody with good stuff,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but platoon concerns and command concern and so like, that's

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>why he's typically been used in the eighth inning of

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a team. Doesn't have to use him in the ninth

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just because you can use him against righty's, you can

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>use them. He's at the last line of defense. You

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can have somebody warming the bullpen, a left handed component

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ready in the bullpen if needed to, where you know

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not an insult if you pull him, versus in

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the ninth. Typically don't have somebody warming up when the

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>closers in the game. And so there's this general concern

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>about Domingas. If the splitter wasn't what he needed to

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>neutralize lefties enough, then he has problems in this case.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the mistake was a sweeper, he had Dingler in

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a one to two counts. The fastball did what it

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>should have done in terms of getting behind. He was

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>chasing away like all he had to do. And this

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is very simple, but in terms of like you can

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the thought process. It wasn't the case where he

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>had to execute a pitch that he doesn't really excute

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that often. Sweeper is a good pitch for him. Just

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>had to get off the plates, left it up, elevated

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on the outer third Dingler smash it. So like that's

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>execution error versus like the weakness of Dominga's wearing its

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>ugly head. Also, he had like the infield single by

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a hair of a step that you kept the ending going.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So a little bit of bad luck, a little bit

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, McGonagall beating him, and then a little

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of just mortality or just uh, decent hitter beating

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a decent picture because it happens in baseball, and when

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it happens the ninth inning, it's under the microscope. And

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Dominga's like when you put them under the microscope, there

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>are things you notice that aren't that flattering, and then

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>when you zoom out you still notice them. So that's why,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the white sox on in the contract

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>they signed him to, which is kind of the contract

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a bet on somebody who might be able to

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>close versus a proven closer versus like son of Mag's

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>established as a setup guy. So yeah, you have concerns

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about him just hitting that ceiling over and over again.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Taylor is like weird just because he has these characteristics

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>James writes about of just you know, he has this

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. He has a starter's arsenal, he's got extension.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>The individual pitches great out well, and sometimes like he

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just gets burned, like whether it's a homer, whether it's

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know again batting avergement balls to play like sequencing

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bad luck week hits, you know, solid hits. There's this

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>element of like why is it come together? Why is

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he why is he have reverse splits somehow? Like there's

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there are these kind of components that just never quite

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fit and it's hard to know. I think, you know,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>having James on hand to write about pictures, it's a

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a double edged sword because like he

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>still get a drilling down, uh, And I don't think

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>many teams have somebody covering them who drills down to

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>pictures to where is the case where do all elite

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>relievers have weird things going on? That just aren't being

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>explored because their savorr it's okay. Or is the case

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>where Taylor does have some strange characteristics that are maybe

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>unique to him or unique to his the strength of

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>his arsenal just you know, and also his youth relative

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and experience relieving that you know it's there are some

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>warts or lumps he takes when he tries to put

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it all together over the course of a full season.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's sticks out in my head, I

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>should say, of like when the failures come up, like well,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he does have reverse splits somehow, and you know, like, yeah,

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it does have to locate the curveball. If lefties are

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>spitting on the curveball, then you know, perhaps the fastball

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes more you know, vulnerable. Yeah it's Taylor. I'm still

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out for a number, because it seems

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like he's trying to figure himself out for whittling down

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his arsenal and handling relievers. Could be a case too,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>where like a mid season wall, little bits of just

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>league figuring my little bit stuff isn't as sharp and

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so they can game plan from a little bit better.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Mistakes get hit harder. I would say I have more

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>faith in Taylor figuring it out versus Dimingas because Dominga's'

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>flaws are well established and every team that's used him

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as closers kind of wrestled with this a little bit.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But both I think have a cause for concern. Yeah,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not like severe, I would say lingering cause for concern

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that the pieces don't quite fit right, especially if like

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's being used for multiple innings then is unavailable and

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Dimingus more has to be the guy that, yeah, he

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>has weaknesses being so yet it's it's not an elite bullpen.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And when the office is scoring, then did the the

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny intensifies simply like Hudson when he had that rough

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>patch of just like well, he has been DFAD an

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>awful lot in his career. It's where you know, all

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, him showing up in this lockdown lefty

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>form is new, and when he regression sets in, you

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think like, oh, oh is turning to pumpkin, and like, no,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he's fine, He's just good not greats. And so sometimes

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think with Taylor there's also a case where he's

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>good not greats and then just having this sudden contending

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>level of scrutiny and slimmer margin for error or the

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>errors that are made are felt more. That's new and

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how they handle it.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I think with Domingez, my take on this situation in

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 3>he told James Spgan during that excellent piece about the

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>bullpen that you could read on soxsmachine dot com, is

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that Dimingus really wants every save opportunity. But moving forward,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how Will Venable trusts him to do

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>that his last two outings against the Dodgers and the Tigers,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I should say, in his last two save opportunities, because

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>he did on Saturday, just to get some work in.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 6>It's been to Alex Colomelake.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I continue to use this phrase because he just continues

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 3>to put base runners on And it was the same situation, Jim,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 3>It's seven eighty nine. If you can't trust Sir Anthony

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Domingus to face the bottom of the order in any

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 3>medium to high leverage late inning situation, what do you

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 3>do with this guy? And I don't know if I'm

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Will Venable, I don't know how I can have any

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>confidence in Dimingus. You're still gonna need him with his

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>home stand against two Ale Central opponents.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 6>Maybe you bitch him in the seventh, maybe you bitch

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 6>him in the eighth.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 3>You do risk of him getting upset that he's not

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>getting save opportunities because that's why he signed with the

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>White Sox and that's what he was sold on. And

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe you do have grant Taylor pitch that ninth inning.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>There are White Sox fans though that after Sunday's game

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>thought Taylor should have pitched two innings because he's not

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>pitching all that frequently. Jim, and I'm under the impression

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 3>that Venable did not pushe Taylor into the ninth inning.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 3>So he has Taylor available to use either a Monday

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 3>or Tuesday against Cleveland. You might be able to only

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 3>use Taylor a couple times a week. So I don't

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 3>know how Venable handles this moving forward, but I don't

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>think it's a Venable issue. It's just that Taylor and

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Domingas need to do their job, especially Sir Anthony Domingus,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 3>because if this continues and you don't have a lot

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 3>of confidence in what Dimingas can do in medium or

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 3>to high level situations during the season, I don't know

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 3>how you use him.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 6>It just feels like it's ten million dollars.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a complete waste.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think with Dominga is like it was fine

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>having him close because it was the bottom of the order, right.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>They shape these saves to where Taylor faces the tougher

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>part or maybe the lefties, and then when the ninth

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>inning rolls run, oftentimes ninth innings do roll around to

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the bottom the order just because of the way you know,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven outs rolls. Is that oftentimes, in an average

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>game with an average number of plate appearances, the bottom

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of the order comes up last, and so there will

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be saved situations. What's weird to me about Domingas is

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like the number of days off he's had this month,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, looking at the day's rest, like this

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was the first time he's pitched with like one day's rest.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise it's like five three. He's pitched on back to

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>back days once and then had another three days rest

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and another four days rest, so he's been infrequently used.

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Even going back to last month too, he had six

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>days rest at one point. So you get the situation

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of like if it is rust or if it is

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a case where you know he doesn't get many Yeah,

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and the roles he was previously working in, Like he'd

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just be working as a set up guys. Sometimes they'd

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be trailing by one, sometimes they'd be ahead by one,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and so he'd work more regularly. Whereas when they're trying

0:20:55.119 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to shoehorn shoehorn them into these ideal closer situations, or

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe they have him backing up Taylor, but then Taylor

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ends up going two winnings and they don't need him.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You do get a case where like he doesn't pitch

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so like in terms of innings because he's missed time

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with injuries here and there. He's not off his usual

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>innings total, but you know from last year when he

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>was healthy and especially for the postseason, like, he does

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like to work. And so I wonder if because of

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this like level of distrust with him as the closer,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but also not wanting to relegate him to seventh inning

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>appearances when you know they'd be normally Sir Anthony Diminga

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is shaped in previous seasons. But you can't quite save

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>him that because then they're saying you're not the closer. Uh,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>And then like the ninth in things don't roll around

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and like he can't be used for those either because

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's available, or you want your lefty in there instead.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You might get situations where you just don't pitch him enough,

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and so he does come in these situations where it

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>has to work and then it doesn't quite work. So

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's maybe overall a little bit of an

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>awkward existence to where Yeah, I mean, he's being paid

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like a good reliever, so he should pitch like a

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>good reliever anytimes called upon. But he's also not working

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as he's used to working, and so it

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>might be something where he's not feeling like himself either,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's yeah, it's a strange fit right now with

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the way they paid him to close in the way

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not quite living up to it and the way

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>will Avnable is reacting to it.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Would you have Bush Davis Martin one more inning because

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>he was only at seventy seven pitches through six.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I can see the argument both ways.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If he started the inning, it would have been fine.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He has t top concerns time times through the order,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>penalty concerns, like the third time through has been markedly

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>worse than the second first, So if you're looking and

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you ever bullpen lined up, sure, this might be

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the time to have him avoid that. You know, you're

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not saving Brian hug and you're not saving Grant Taylor

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>like they're rested for the situation. Give it to him

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>because how often does this happen where it's all lined up. Also,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems like Martin hit a wall. Speaking

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of mid season walls a little bit where he talked

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>about being guessed and not executing the way he was.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you see an opportunity to spare him an inning,

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>spare him some pitches, you have him be more effective

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>through the rest of the season. You take those little opportunities.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So I could see, you know, not going with him.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't necessarily dominant. He was fine. He's very effective,

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't like he was blowing guys away, only

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>four strikeouts, got double plays to get out of the ending,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>worked around some traffic. So yeah, I could see him

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>starting the inning and like getting in trouble. But I

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>could also see a case where it was very the

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity was there to to cut it off after six

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>quality start. Great job. All our best relievers are lined

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>up for perfect handedness, in spot in the lineup deployments.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's use He's let's use this opportunity while we haven't.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I think I'm on the side where

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like what Venable did was fine.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Now the opener this has been a I don't know

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>if it's a sticky point for White Sox fans, but

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 3>there are some that really do not like will Aventable

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 3>using one of his relievers to start the game. This

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 3>was asked to will Ventable over the weekend about his

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 3>use of the opener. Here's White Sox manager Will Venable

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>explaining his rationale continuing to use the strategy.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, the players reactions as we've done it more,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 2>they've they've been more open to it. And really that's

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 2>where it starts. You know, you are sensitive to the

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 2>fact that these guys are very you know, routine oriented,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and that certainly for a starting picture that using an

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>open and disrupt that. You know, so you have different

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 2>reactions to it. And in the case of when we've

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 2>done it with Vetty and Burt, you know, they've they've

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 2>responded very well to it.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, as far as today.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Goes, today is not a traditional opener. It's a bullpen day.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 2>But you know, as far as the benefits of an

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>open is, you know, number one, you know you have

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 2>some upside to the matchups up front, where in the

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>case of let's say that the Tigers, where you have

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>a green and a McDonald gold, that you know that

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>regardless of if you throw a left to your righty,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get him the top four.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 4>You know it.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Also, you know there's an adjustment usually by the opposition

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 2>in which benefits you're both guy. So yesterday again a

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 2>really good example where you have Burling in there. You know,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 2>you end up with an extra riety or two for Fetti,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you're able to drop him and start him in a

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>spot that's maybe more beneficial for him. So you know,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of benefits to it. And you know yesterday,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 2>even even with the two runs that they ended up

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>scoring that you know maybe you don't love because you

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 2>did use the opener, you know it really did put

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Eddie in a good spot to go through that line

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>up a couple of times and was able to be

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 2>successful and then tough luck play there that they ended

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 2>up scoring. So there's a lot of benefits to it.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but you know, in

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the right situations against the right line, it's a good strategy.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Jim, we continue to see the opener by the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 3>White Sox. We'll be reviewing the upcoming series against Cleveland.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Usually he's been using the opener for Sean Burke and

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Eric Vetty, and both those guys will be admiring in

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 3>this upcoming series against Cleveland. We're about halfway through the season.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Are you okay with the opener strategy.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's fine, especially for the pitchers being used.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think like Sunday or I should say not in

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday the finale with the Yankees, Sean Burke throwing the

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>final seven to third inning after Brian Hudson was like, Yeah,

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the opener strategy. Like the perfect execution of

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it one and two thirds things by Hudson, Burke going

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the other twenty two outs. That's what I would point to,

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>is the exact idea of what you're going for, like

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the perfect execution of it. Everybody living up to the idea.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And then some like if Burke started the game and

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>went seven and the third innings, he'd say, like, great start.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that he like was the last pitcher used,

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is very satisfying and basically put him in

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a position to succeeed. I think same thing as Fetti.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Like we were worried about Fetti, thinking like he is

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on the chopping block because like San Francisco lit him

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>up and he just wasn't getting any guys out and

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they use the opener for that one, but like they

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>stuck with it and like the next outing was fine,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and like they've actually yeah, and like looking at his

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>record of just the or the White Sox record in

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>games he's pitched, Like they lost his game against Detroit,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but he was fine in that one. They won the

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>previous four, so it's working. Not always the prettiest. I

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think you get into the situation that like Rick Rentrie

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think found especially objectionable, and he was the manager

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and like kind of the opener came into vogue and

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't go along with it. It's just like when

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you get into the situation where the opener doesn't get

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>out of the first it feels like what was the

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>points You're already scrambling. It's a disaster, And sometimes it happens,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but like in the case of Fetti's outing, against Atlanta

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that happened and he pitched five and they won the

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>game and ten innings. So like, there are ways to

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get out of it, even if it looks especially ugly early.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't see any argument to go against it.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Anthony k grumbled against it and then

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he pitched well enough to get out of that to

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>where he needed somebody holding his hand in the starts.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>But like Fetti, probably not in a position to complain

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, even if he doesn't like it, given the

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>year he had last year and what he signed for

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox. But you know, he's been pitching better

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>than the White Soxs have been winning games. It's not

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like you're costing him arbitration earnings because he's not getting wins.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Like he's somebody who just needs to contribute to a

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>pitching staff. So I think he's like the ideal guy

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to open four and Burke. I think you would hope

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that as he evolves or kind of settles into what

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>his final form is as a major league starter, then

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he can handle games by himself. But if he goes

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the final seven to the third inning, he has somebody

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>open for him against a good offense. Then yeah, that

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>shows at least he's not you know, making excuses or

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>like pointing the finger at being asked to enter in

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle of an inning, like he's he handled it well.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I see no fault with the deployment of openers.

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean with how well Sean Newcome pitched in that

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>bullpen game, Like maybe he's the ideal opener. I'm not

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 3>crazy about Brandon Isisert me and the opener. Like, if

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna do this because you're facing strong lefties, I

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 3>would probably go at Newcome, maybe Brian Hudson if you

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 3>are going to continue to go back to back with

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Sean Berke and Eric Fetti and using the opener. Yeah,

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not I don't know what. I don't know

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 3>how you use Brandon Eisert other than hey, we're down five,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 3>it's the eighth inning. How about you close this one

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 3>out for us? Brandon, Like that's the only usage I

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 3>could think of for him.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>No, he's he's not somebody who has splits really like

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he had reverse splitz last year. He has traditional splits

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this year and to the extent of like ops but

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like righty's are hitting three hundred against him. So it's

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a case where like lefties are doing more damage, but

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>right you see him just fine. Like it's a strange case,

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you're not. I think he might be useful

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as lefty against lefties who struggled against lefties, but coming

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in for the first inning and facing like usually if

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 1>they're at the top of the order, their talented left

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>handed hitters who manage lefties just fine. Yeah, I don't

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>think his arsenal is shaped to get them out in

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a way that's especially useful.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I agree with you there, no, yeah, I

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 3>but then again, who do you have right now in

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Charlotte that you can call up to replace Brandon isis

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 3>or the pitching depth as you wrote, Jim is a

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of thin at the moment.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, like, I don't think there's a Joe

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Rock was there now he's in the uh he's in

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen right now. But I think like they have relievers,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>just not lefty relievers.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I can think of the Joe Rock experience is wild

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>because it does not look good at all. But he's

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 3>only given up like maybe a run in his three

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 3>innings that he's pitching. It's not a pretty it's effectively wild.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Joe rock Is.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 3>That's the White Sox bull event right now. They the

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 3>team really could use them to step up. But I

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 3>think to wrap up as far as that conversation, Sir

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Amingus Man, you can't fail anymore seven, eight, nine.

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 6>You gotta lead.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 3>You want these saves, close the game, no excuses.

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 6>Do your job, Bud.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 3>You're getting paid a lot of money, and it's not

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 3>that difficult of a task. To your point, Jim Grant,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Taylor's handling the harder task. Now, what would have helped

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 3>this weekend for the White Sox in Detroit is scoring

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot more runs. They're offense was very quiet. They

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 3>only scored eight runs in this three game series. Maybe

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the most devastating stat from this weekend, Colson Montgomery, Chase

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>my Draft and Miguel Vargas combined two for thirty. That

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>is very tough for the White Sox to get any

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>type of offense going, especially with how will Venna Bull

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 3>has been using all three of these hitters in the

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 3>middle of the lineup. Montgomery went zero for eleven, my

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Draft one for ten, and Vargas one for nine. Sam

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Antonaci had a good weekend. He went four for ten,

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>but playing the games at America Park, just watching these swings,

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>it was a lot of fly balls that were just

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 3>not carrying at K America, Jim and I'm wondering were

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 6>Trying too hard to hit home runs in Detroit?

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not hit home runs in terms of selling out,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think they were trying to attack pitches in

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the zone. Like I think they had an idea of, like,

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys can throw strikes pretty well, so we can't

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>count on waiting them out into fastball counts. We need

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to attack the pitch that we want early. And I think,

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of like the opposite of Hawk

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Erelson saying, you know, the more pitches you see, the

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous he become. I think it can pile up

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to where like we're not seeing many pitches, and so

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it just looks very very effective and just kind of

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>flastied overall. And so you know, perhaps the extent that

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hitting is contagious, I think like sometimes not hitting is contagious.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Or you get a situation where we've only made him

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>throw twenty two pitches in three innings, and now we

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>got to start taking pitches. But then you get bad

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>counts and you get out of sorts a little bits,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I feel bad for Luis on Helicunya

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>because like that should have been his game on Sunday.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Like he's been I think he settled into a role

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in June to where like he's been useful. Like it

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's not playing much center field because Tristan

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Peters has it handled, so he's more or less the

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>backup shortstop, pinch runner occasional, yeah, maybe gets one start

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>in a series, but like he's playing pretty well. He's

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hitting over four hundred in June. Like he's the ideal

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six man right now, or like last man on

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the bench in that you don't have to play him

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>all that much and you're still getting something from him

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>when he plays, and you're not like having Jacob gonzalezit

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for no reason. So like I was really hoping that

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that game would be kind of a launch point for like, hey,

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Luis an Helicunya kind of like the I

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think what the White Sox were hoping for for somebody

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who can provide some usefulness in the ninth spot. Whenever

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it gets on base, it's great. And he showed power

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over the winter leagues, and to see

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that manifest itself in a major league game was cool.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe more of that. So that's my attempt to talk

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>about Luise on Hilicuna when the bullpen overshadowed him. But

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, they they try to attack early. You know,

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, just you know, Miguel Vargas is off, and

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he did get a half game of rest

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's been playing basically nearly every game, nearly every inning,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and just looked off. He had some short of bats,

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he had some Yeah, he had a three pitch strikeout

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't great. Also, one thing that's kind of jumped

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>out to me over the last two series is a

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of hitters not challenging and you could see him

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>just like shaking their head and just yeah, And I'm

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm at home being like, you know, tap in my

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>head just like that's I do that on my couch.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I just want to pitches off, just like might

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>want to challenge that and they can't see me. But

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be like after Edgar Edgar Carroll burns

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>one early on and so they're down to the last

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge and it does seem like they had again, like

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>when they try to take pitches, then the count wasn't

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>with them because the pitchers were around the plate enough

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and the catchers were doing a good, good enough job

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>of getting those borderline strikes called for them to where

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it kind of piled up against them. So I'm willing

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to write it off as a bad series, just kind

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of a uninspiring week overall. Could be a case where

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know there is some fatigue setting in. There is

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like fatigue in terms of just like not having I

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>guess partially fatigue partially like you're counting on Miguel Vargus

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot when he wasn't expected to be that

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>great entering the season. He's been wonderful this season in

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>All Star of the season, but like there will be

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>moments maybe where Miguel Vargus looks like the Miguel Vargus

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that we thought he was, And so you know, what's

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the counterpoint. And then you get into the case where

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like the nobody's producing for catchers, Coase Montgomery runs hot

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and cold, Braid Montgomery and Jacob Gonzalez or rookies, and

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so maybe the lineup isn't as deep as it sometimes

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>looks or sometimes so I am curious. Then we're going

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this a little bit in terms of

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like when Kyle Teal comes back in LinkedIn's lineup, when

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>catcher goes from being a zero to maybe being a plus,

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what does that look like for the rest of the lineup.

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But for the time being, you know, as long as

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>they've had that hole in their lineup, and as long

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>as they have a lot of inexperienced players a lot

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of like shuffling, you could have these ruts where if

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Colson isn't doing it, if Vargas has the odd week

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>off then or should off week he's never off, then

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you do get in these situations where the offense doesn't

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>come as easily.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the one adjustment for future games play

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to k America because I know Colson Montgomery and James's

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 3>latest column from Detroit that Montgomery is admitting that maybe

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 3>with youth on their side, they don't know what they

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 3>don't know. The thing about k America is if you're

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 3>noticing that the ball is just not carrying, especially for

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Colson hitting a lot of fly balls that weren't reaching

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the warning track, it's this whole concept of you have

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>to think small, and with Detroit throwing so many fastballs

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 3>in the outer third against Colson or even off speed stuff,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 3>like he needs to make an adjustment next time he

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 3>faces Detroit. In Detroit, don't be afraid to just flip

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 3>those pitches to left field because the way that they

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 3>pulled the outfield and we saw this with Tristan Peters's double,

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 3>The left fielder against the lefty hitters for the White

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Sox was way in the gap, so you had that

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 3>complete line. So if you just waited a little bit

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 3>longer like Peters did and you flip it down the

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 3>left field.

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 6>Line, that's like an automatic double.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 3>So I just felt like there was more opportunities and

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 3>in late game situations, Detroit was very much thinking small,

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 3>just focusing not only just putting the ball in play,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 3>but hitting line drives, finding pitches that they can hit

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 3>a line drive and put some pressure on the White

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Sox pitchers. There just wasn't a whole lot of pressure

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 3>this weekend from the White Sox hitters against the Tigers pitchers.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot of walks as well on this weekend,

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 3>so I kind of question what the entire opensive game

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 3>plan was coming to this series for the White Sox,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 3>but it just puts more stress in the bullpen. The

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 3>margins are very small and that's how you get swept

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 3>when things just don't bounce in your favor for the

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Chicago White Sox. But do want to also give a

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 3>cap tip to Junior Prez for hitting his first major

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 3>league home run off Trek Scooble of all pitchers, so

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 3>that was a pretty cool moment. Junior Prez should have

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 3>had his game on Friday. Jim Luisa, helicoon, you should

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:41.439
<v Speaker 3>have had his game on Sunday. Alas, the White Sox

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 3>still gets swept. And now the Chicago White Sox come home,

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and this is a key home stand for the White Sox.

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 3>It's against American League Central opponents, but none bigger than

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Monday through Wednesday, as the White Sox and the Cleveland

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Guardians finally face each other for the first time in

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six. The Cleveland Guardians are in first place.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 3>They did not have a great week. They had a

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 3>slightly better week than the White Sox. They were two

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and four this week instead of the White Sox going

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 3>one in five. But the Guardians, who have a one

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 3>game lead in the American League Central. They are currently

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 3>forty one and thirty seven. They're just four and ten

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>in the last ten game, four and six, I'm sorry,

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 3>in their last ten games. Just like the White Sox,

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the Guardians are a good road team. They are twenty

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 3>two and twenty this year away from Cleveland. You're bitching

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 3>problems for this series. Monday and Tuesday night. These are

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 3>at six forty pm Central time starts. It is the

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 3>righty Gavin Williams for the Guardians against Anthony k for

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox. On Tuesday, it's Parker Messik against Sean Burke.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.760
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if the White Sox to use an opener

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 3>on Tuesday, and then a Wednesday getaway day.

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 6>This is a one ten pm Central Time start.

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>It's Tanner Bibe against Eric Fetti again opener for Fetti.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Biby and Fetti seem to be the bad luck starting

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 3>pitchers for both teams, as they've been pitching a lot

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 3>better than what their win loss records look like. I

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.959
<v Speaker 3>think the big storyline from a White Sox perspective entering

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 3>this series Jim is the possible return of Kyle Teal.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Will Venable mentioned that he would be speaking with Chris

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Getz after Sunday's game against the Detroit Tigers. We are

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 3>expecting some type of clarity from the Chicago White.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 6>Sox on Monday before the game.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 3>If not in the morning, I guess the best news

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 3>White Sox fans is that if we all receive the

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 3>email press release from the White Sox they have activated

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Teal, that's going to probably come around like ten

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in the morning, and that will be a breaking news

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 3>story on soxmachine dot com that you'd be able.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 6>To check out. If we don't get that email, then.

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Around three o'clock we're going to get some type of

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 3>explanation from Will Venable, maybe even Chris Guetz on what

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the status is with Kyle Teel.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 6>But Jim Teal's good. I mean, he looks strong.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I guess he didn't need that many at bats in

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Charlotte if they do call him up, But they really

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 3>do need Kyle Teal.

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 6>I did not know just how.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Bad the production has been for the catcher spot for

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox gym until I looked at fangrafts, both

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 3>not only offensively but defensively. White Sox catchers mostly Drew

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Romo and Edgar Carro rank dead last in war negative

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 3>zero point eight. So bringing back Kyle Teal this is

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the perfect time in my opinion, Jim, when now facing

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the Guardians, how do you feel that the immediate impact

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 3>could be with the return of Kyle Teal.

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to put too much stress on a

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who hasn't appeared in a major league game yet

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>this year and is coming off of.

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 3>He's already gonna put a lot of stress on himself,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 3>because that's just the way Kyle Teal is.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Its case, We're like, yeah, sure, it'd be great if

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he hits yea and right away, just given how little

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the catcher like the opportunities right there. And we've seen

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>this before with the White Sox of just how hard

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is it to upgrade a position when they're that bad

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and then turns out like, h yeah, well, one they've

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been so bad that like they're three four wins below

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>replacement and then they upgrade like one win below replacement

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and still bad, and you don't actually feel an impact

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>because like bad is bad to quote Huey Lewis. With

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>White Sox catchers, perhaps like catching is unique enough, the

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>demand's position are unique enough to where you can feel

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the upgrade because you don't expect offense. So an offense

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.959
<v Speaker 1>shows up even an average amount lineup gets lengthened. Also,

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll see like how much he plays, if he's gonna

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>play most days, or if they're gonna ease him into

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>everyday duty, or like are they gonna play two catchers?

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna d H how's that gonna work? Well? Yeah,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I would be okay with him getting like every other

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.879
<v Speaker 1>game treatment early on, because I think like a half

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>dose of Kyle Teal helps quite a bit with the

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 1>way the offense or just like the lineup is right now,

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe for a week or two, never having him catch

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>two games in a row, just to make sure that

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>everything structurally sound, because it would be a bummer if

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like he catches two games in a row and then

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>like something barks on him and then obviously he's back

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on the angel list. So I think that would be

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 1>what I would consider reasonable, and anything above that's fine.

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the the offense is looking for like a

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a Kyle Teal like production, both in terms of just

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>hit tool power. The position he plays like fits in

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>perfectly to add a level that this offense has not

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had and uh so, yeah, good luck. Just the filling

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>goes eye. Uh if he starts out like zero for

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve because he's a rusty just yeah, it suld be

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a sure be a bummer. But hopefully he's got a

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to let it even out or get

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>up to speed. Like he doesn't have to be great

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>right away, as long as he's healthy and the legs

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are responding well enough to where like he can handle

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a major league workload the rest of the way.

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the flip side, if he goes three for four

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 3>against Cleveland on Monday.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, proof of concept immediately, Yeah, exactly.

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 3>I can see a situation where he starts Monday and Wednesday,

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and well maybe that's the follow up question. And I

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 3>think maybe he comes off the bench in a bit

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 3>hitting situation in Tuesday's game with Parker Messik taking the

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 3>ball for the Guardians. He've been very good, but he

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 3>pitches from the left hand side, so maybe try to

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 3>use the platoon advantage.

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Now, with that said, I don't know who you send back.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 3>To Charlotte, Drew Romo or Edgar Carro at this stage,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 3>both of them, in my opinion, I don't think there's

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 3>anyone else that you can call up along with Kyle

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Teal to do a complete hockey line change at the

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 3>catcher position. Do you have a preference Jim Romo or

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Arrow to back up Kyle Teeal?

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean Romo is batting one forty four. It kind

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of feels like what.

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 6>Is Carrow batting?

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Not one? Okay, like I'm looking at uh yeah, let

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>me look at the He's two for thirty one his

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>last ten games.

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, yeah, time to time to get yourself to

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>work on yourself down in Charlotte while the White Sox

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 3>try to win some games.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So I do think it's a case where, like you know,

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a good opportunity for Caro to be the

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy, the number one catcher, even if he's traded,

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like a good way to prove that he can handle

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>another team's number one catcher demands and didn't do it.

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think now with what the situation the White

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Sox find themselves in, can't really worry about him being

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 1>shaped like a trade asset. It's more a matter of

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like Kyle Teal needs to catch as much as possible

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>as much as is responsible to put on his plates

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and then Carol, you handle the rest, we'll see one

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 1>if he like, maybe he responds well of that, maybe

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like he plays well being the second catcher versus like

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the one a guy he kind of was or behind

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Romo and he looks closer what he looked like last year,

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and then like he's still a useful catcher, maybe just

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not a guy you're hoping to trade for like a

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>significant asset. But I think right now, just yeah, treat

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Carroll like a backup. Don't worry about playing time. Just

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get your two best catchers available, and then play your

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>best catcher between those two as much as his body

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 1>will allow. And then if Carol is you know, if

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Carol has a roma like stretch to wear, like he's

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not hitting at all, then maybe you you know, switch

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>out catchers, bring Romo back up. Look on the waiver wire,

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like for like a minor trade just to bring in

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody else who is in Corey lease, since it seems

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like they're completely out on him. Uh, but there are

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it. But yeah, I think it's pretty simple.

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Don't overthink it's as far as as soon as Teal

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is ready to catch what he was hoping to catch

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the season, then give it to him.

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and the DH.

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to put both of them in the lineup.

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 3>That's so we talked about last year. A way that

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Randall Gritchik and Andrew Benattendee have been hitting, you can

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 3>continue to having those guys take care.

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Of the DH role.

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 3>So unlike last year, we're not going to see Teal

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 3>and Caro both in the same lineup. So I guess

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 3>you can keep Edgar Carro to be his backup. But yeah,

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 3>hopefully lots of Kyle Teal again when the news does break.

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 3>Visit us on Socksmachine dot com to check out that

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 3>news keys to this series. As we wrap up. As

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 3>far as this episode, All Go Far, Team Go Far.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 3>We know the White Sox love to hit a lot

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of home runs, especially at Rate Field. The stat that

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 3>surprised me. We talk about how the White Sox can

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 3>use some right handed bats. The White Sox lead major

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.240
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball in hitting home runs against left handed pitching,

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 3>so Messi's been rate for Cleveland. Can they find some

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 3>instant offense in that form? As far as hitting home

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 3>runs against the Cleveland lefties, Jim the White Sox with

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 3>not having to face Rosier Ramirez that's good news. Stephen

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Kwan hasn't been that straw this year. But Travis Bozana

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 3>is having himself a week. In his last seven games,

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Bzana is hitting four seventeen with a five seventeen on

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 3>base percentage like in eight seventy five. He's got three

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.839
<v Speaker 3>homers and seven RBIs. I think he's the guy right

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 3>now in the lineup for the White Sox pitchers that

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 3>all right, there's no Hose Ramirez. We have to figure

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 3>out this rookie and shut down Travis Bozana.

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, chase the latters out too, So that really does

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>put the focus on just a few bats. Yeah, Bazana

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is is a key. I was looking at their monthly

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>splits and you know, it's basically like Cleveland has turned

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to ev more of a Cleveland form since this month,

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and that they're allowing the fourth fewest runs, but they're

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>scoring the fewest. So I would expect low scoring games.

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I would expect execution to be at a premium. You know,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to your point about bullpen has to doest job, but

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>also like defense has Stuart's job. Like we've seen the

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Guardians out defend the White Sox and win that way.

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Many many, many, many, many, many many times. And I

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:29.840
<v Speaker 1>guess with you know, Josh Naylor completed out of the

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>picture with Jose Ramirez out of the picture, like you

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>are losing some of the usual suspects to where, uh,

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there shouldn't be the boogeymen around them, to where you

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:41.439
<v Speaker 1>shake your head and say, like, yep, there he goes

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like Bazana, Yeah he's good, just unknown, so you don't

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>have that scar tissue built up. They should be able

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to handle themselves well, Like, yeah, there's no reason to

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fear Cleveland at this point. They're a good team, Like

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're uh, they do what they do well,

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but they are wounded right now. And you know they

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>did get outplayed. You know, they did have that formula

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>used against him against Milwaukee, Like the Milwaukee does that

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>very well in terms of hitting well, but also pitching

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>well and bullpenning well and defending well in all of

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that to where like you can't out Cleveland Milwaukee. So

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they are gettable. So time to dust themselves off,

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>get the home magic going again, and you know, win

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>two out of.

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Three and not have to face Kate sved went down. Yeah,

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 3>he's been really good.

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:35.399
<v Speaker 6>He's been really good.

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>They have their formula like, they have their high leverage

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Classe never mattered formula like. It's amazing how they

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>can just keep doing that.

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the first five innings of these games

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to be pretty important for the White Sox

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 3>try to avoid the back end of Cleveland's bullpen. They've

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 3>been very tough this year. But we'll be recapping these

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 3>games of course on socks machine dot com. James Hegan

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 3>will be covering these games for us as well throughout

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 3>this entire homestand so again, please subscribe to our YouTube

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 3>channel to check out all of our videos. Has been

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 3>posting the postgame press conferences and also YouTube shorts as well.

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 3>We've been posting those over on our Instagram page as well.

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You can follow us on Instagram at sos Machine. But

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 3>that will do it for this episode of the Sox

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Machine podcast. Thank you guys so much for listening and watching.

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 3>If you just discover the Sox Machine podcast, you can

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 3>subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts or

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Spotify and Apple Music. You can watch the shows on

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash sox Machine

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and follow us on all the social media platforms we

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 3>are at sox Machine. You can follow James at j rfigan.

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 3>You can follow me at sox Machine Underscore Josh. If

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you enjoy our work and want full access to all

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:50.319
<v Speaker 3>of our coverage of the Chicago White Sox, Major League

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Baseball and the upcoming Major League Baseball Draft, you can

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 3>help support sox Machine by becoming a subscriber at soxsmachine

0:52:56.640 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash Products for five dollars a month. You

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 3>can get ad free versions of both the podcast and

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the website. Unlocks the comments section as well.

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 4>For you.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 3>We're still running that special, right Jim. As far as

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the winning percentage of the first month discount.

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>H yes, but the price is dropping unfortunately fortunately for you. Yeah,

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for us. Uh and I think the White Sox

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fortunes as a whole. I guess it was down fifty

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>two cents versus fifty four. But ultimately good news for

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you the not yet subscriber first month of soxs Machine

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 1>for just fifty two cents.

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so great deal. Go to soxmachine dot com slash

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Products and sign up today. The sox Machine podcast is

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a production of Soxmachine dot com. You're on for all

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 3>things for Chicago White Sox baseball. Alongside Jim Margolus, I'm

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Josh Nelson. Thanks for listening and watching.