WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - May 7th, 2021 (Podcast)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news as it happened. Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Stinevin on Bloomberg Radio, Hi, and welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. It is week sixty. Working

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>from home. For some Tim felt like a lot more

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>people were back in offices throughout New York City, certainly

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in our office at Bloomberg Headquarters. We both were in

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the office again this week. Traffic definitely up in the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>city streets. Yeah, I'm looking forward to when I am

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>fully vaccinated taking the subway again so I can get

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>off those streets. Whiles the world continued to open up,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw the gaps between the halves and the have

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>nots in our economy continue to widen. Coming up this hour,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>two big thinkers tackling the major issues of our time, crises,

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>technological powerhouses, and more. We're gonna hear from Bloomberg opinion

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>columnist and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Neil Ferguson about his book Doom, The Politics of Catastrophe,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>plus n y U professor author entrepreneurs Scott Galloway you

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>know him, on breaking up big tech and unlocking value,

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite guests this week. All of that

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to come. We begin, though, with one of the Bloomberg

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Big takes this week. It's the Bloomberg exclusives that you

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be focusing on that only we have. It

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>also turned out to be one of our most read

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg this week. It's about how the

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>booming US recovery is leaving some communities completely behind. Bloomberg

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>News Federal Reserve and economics reporter Katerina survived of philled

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>us in Carol on some really interesting data. She gets to,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know something Timmy and I have talked about with

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Atwater and others about, you know, the recovery or

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>even I was having a conversation with one of my

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>brothers saying for some people the pandemic obviously it impacted

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We thought about her help, but they were able to work.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of them made a lot of money if you

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>were invested in the stock market or elsewhere, like it

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>just didn't impact us all equally. There are other people though,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that lost their job completely or just scraping to get by.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's so important about katerina story is

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it touches on of course sector and industry,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.919
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time geography and thinking about different

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>responses that different cities have had. Atlanta's decision to have

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a partial reopening earlier than many places, and then Las Vegas,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, the city heavily reliant on tourism, and what

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>happens when tourism rise up there. It's a totally different

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thing than what's playing out in Phoenix, for example, where

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a booming home building has been really good for many

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>minorities who live there. This is where the granular level

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>really makes a difference. Right. You can see we do

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it here, We have stories, we have a big headline.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But once you start to dig deeper into the data

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have to look at those demographics, you have

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to look at your geography. You do sometimes have to

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>look at sector breakdowns. That tells you a much more

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>complete story. Because at the top level it can feel

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like okay, look we're doing okay, but not necessarily when

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you dig down, hey, Katerina, talk a little about the

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>geography here, because what's happening in Atlanta is certainly different

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>than than what's happening in Las Vegas. Take us through

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>those two examples that you and the team touch on

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in this big take. Yeah. So Las Vegas is really

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it is an economy that depends so heavily

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on that leisure and hospitality sector. Right. It's a big

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>tourism destination. It has a lot of casinos and a

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of kind of you know, fun hotels, restaurants that

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>people know about. Um. So this is a this is

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge component of its economy. And since this sector

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was so um intensely impacted by the pandemic, UM, the

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas economy and unemployment there has really suffered. So

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of continued to to feel those effects,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's it's not recovering as quickly some other

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>parts of the country, like Atlanta, which is seeing a

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>stronger recovery. It's it's not as dependent on tourism. Um

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it also um you know it, Georgia is a state

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that reopened very early on, and we're seeing that states

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that did that, you know, I mean, for which which

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>could have had a negative implication in terms of COVID cases. Um,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it did actually help the economic recovery. Talked us about Houston,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>your home state. Have a lot of family in Texas

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>throughout the state too. Houston has been one of the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>better performers Houston. Actually, um, it hasn't been doing super

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>well right now. Um. Actually, when you break it down,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>there was the energy crisis too. I wasn't thinking exactly, yeah, exactly,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's really what's kind of a drag on the

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Houston economy right now. We look at the different race

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>groups and everyone really is still seeing unemployment in the

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>double digits. And exactly it's that energy impact. It's it's

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a big sector for the city. Um, a lot of

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs to revolve around that, and you know that is

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>still suffering a lot. But Phoenix has been somewhat of

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>a bright spot, especially when you dig into the data

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and you look at how communities that have been hardest

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hit by this pandemic have actually fared relatively well. And

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>key word, they're relatively well. And it's be as a

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>housing right right, Yeah, it's it's really seeing a housing boom.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, a lot of cities in this

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>country are um, but that has really boosted the construction

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sector and Phoenix and that in turn is helping Latino

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>people there, um with their unemployment rate. You know, it's

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, fairly low, right, like no one that no

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one has an excellent unemployment rate right now, but um,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but it is, yeah, I mean and Phoenix. You know,

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Arizona also kind of like Texas, has a lot of

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>people moving into it from places like California, right places

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>where housing is more scared. But it's really important what

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you say about looking at local unemployment rates. I know

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys include this in your story about especially for

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more than half of minority groups, local unemployment rates have

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>not fully recovered to march. We really need to look

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>deeper into this to really understand what's going on overall

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the economy and maybe why certain administration programs kind

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of might make sense going forward. Yeah. Absolutely, And I

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is something we're hearing from policymakers that they

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>want to start, um, you know, looking more at the breakdowns.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is this is somewhat new at the at

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the high policy level, so I think it will be

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how how they do that. Well, that

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>was Katerina survived a Federal Reserve and Economics reporter on

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>an uneven comeback from COVID taking place across the country,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't him. We've talked about this so much, we just

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>did with Katerina, But it's just about this k shaped recovery.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter atwardever, William and Mary I bring him up a lot,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>but because he was at their front and center very

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>early on, talking about how the recovery off of the

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>pandemic was different for people, and really starkly different. Some

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people barely felt it, some people felt all of it.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>And what was so interesting about Katerina's story was the

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>regional differences when it comes to the recovery. Yeah, really important,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>right to look around the country and just see those

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>differences coming up. More on the economic recovery and uneven

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one as you just heard this time from the CEO

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of Siemens Us, who has a global snapshot of our

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>world and what's needed specifically to get America back contract.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. This

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg radio. Our listeners and viewers on

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube might recall that we recently caught up with the

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>presidency of siemens Us. She is Barbara Humpton and Tim

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>She talked with us about how work is shifting. It's

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>something you and I talk a lot about because we

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>know whether it's hybrid, do people come back to the office,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to people stay at home. I mean things are changing

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot. She is someone who is talking with leaders

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about making their workplaces safe, making school safe, and planning

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for the next crisis. Barbara joined us again this week

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk all about President Biden's recent call to arms

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to address today's problems, including cementing the USS position on

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>many levels in the future. It includes being self sufficient

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to semiconductors and other major infrastructure projects.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It seemens we're really deeply engaged with all of the

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>critical elements of infrastructure you're hearing discussed today. Earlier this year,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually wrote an open letter to government leaders outlining

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>some suggestions that we have a broader vision for America's

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure because this is a moment to to make those investments,

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and I shared our support in UM investing in manufacturing,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>enabling a new era of electric vehicles, UM, getting cleaner

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and more resilient energy systems, and transforming America's buildings. And

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I was pleased to see so much of this aligns

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with where the federal at the Executive Office is going

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and where the federal government is likely to head UM

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with the support of our legislators. So you know, here

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we are at this moment of deciding what shall we

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>invest in? And this week I decided is the right

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>time for me to raise my voice more clearly on

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the subject of manufacturing. This idea that manufacturing in and

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of itself is a key element of our infrastructure and

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>key to developing the workforce of the future. And I'll

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>tell you at SEMENS, we've got this perspective, not only

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as a manufacturer ourselves with twenty four manufacturing sites across

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the US and forty people all across the nation, a

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain with twenty four thousand US suppliers supporting this

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>backbone of the US economy. But we're also helping of

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the Fortune five industrial companies with our hardware and software

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>that's helping America really adapt to the new digital revolution

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>that's underway. This is our moment, where do we get

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it wrong in the United States when it comes to manufacturing.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>As you said, twenty four manufacturing sites nationwide for semens.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So what do we do wrong here in the United

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>States when it comes to manufacturing or making it more

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>hospitable to more places? You know, I think our incentives

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have changed. If you had looked back over the last

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>two decades, you would have seen American businesses making decisions

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on a global scale, where can we find the lowest

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>cost location for the bulk production and the supply side

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>economies of scale that are going to drive costs down

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, all of those are very useful goals

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to have. But what we've seen now, especially due to

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus crisis, is the fact that we need not

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>globalization so much as glocalization, the idea that we need

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce things closer to where they're needed so that

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not dependent on single points of failure in a

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>global supply chain. We have an opportunity to turn that around.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And people have been asking me, are we going to

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be on shoring or re shoring? And what I keep

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>reminding people is I think what needs to happen for

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>many manufacturers is more of an and than an ore.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We do need to serve people around the world close

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to where they are, but we also need to ring

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability to manufacture right here close to where we

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>need the goods and services. Ultimately, so I'm gonna play

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Devil's advocate a little bit, but I can see companies

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>gearing up already to say, but wait a minute. Now,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you want us to tax more, but you want us

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to build plants in the United States and provide jobs.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And the present makes the case that a lot of

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>corporations get off easy when it comes to paying corporate taxes.

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the data we've certainly reported

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on it here at Bloomberg, that is often the case

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>where companies, through you know, various maneuvers and loopholes, are

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>able to pay a pretty low rate. What do you

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>say to that? What I say to that is, this

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is a moment when business needs to show that we

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are responsible. We have to step up and have a

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>mature dialogue about this. Semans. For our own part, we

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>are responsible taxpayers, and we are really advocating that our

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>tax code represent a regiment that will put us on

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>a level playing field with the rest of the world.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So we of course are not going to be advocating

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for off the charts tax rates for corporate rations when

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it would actually cause investment to flee the company. But

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say we can work with other nations find tax

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>code levels that are going to be equitable, provide that

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of level playing field, and then also really incentivize

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>investment in the US. At Siemens, we've invested forty billion

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars over the last two decades in America, and what

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we're finding is that if we make these investments, then

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the growth comes, the health, the prosperity comes after. These

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>are good investments for us to be making, particularly in

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a time of transformation like this one. So, Barbara, we

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the President's American Jobs Plan manufacturing here

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and I'm thinking after a week

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like we've had so many different earnings and hearing from

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>so many different companies, whether it's Apple, BMW, Ford when

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the global chip ter out, and you know,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we know specifically that company ease like Apple and Samsung

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about production cuts and lost revenue because of the

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>global chip shortage. Tell us about the situation in the US.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You guys have a great vantage point. How bad is

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it and how quickly or what will it take for

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>us to ramp up production so that we can address

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these shortages significantly. This is a real issue because,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as you know, semiconductors are used in everything, cars, planes, computers, batteries,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the toothbrush that use exactly, So there may

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>be a few in me I'm not quite sure. At

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>any given time. We are highly dependent on this technology.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>And back in the nineties, the US had about a

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>market share of the worldwide market, but now we're down

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to a mere twelve percent. So this is one of

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>those areas where this would be a wise investment. It's

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a matter of national security, and by the way, the

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>US security is key to global security, so an investment

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>here is critical for all of US. And and so

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're promoting at Siemens is support

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the chip set, the idea that there would be

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>incentives for local manufacturing. The Department of Commerce is putting

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>their full weight behind us to to locate key semiconductor

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers here. I know there's work already going on in Phoenix. Truly,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this digital economy rides on this technology. That was the

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>president and CEO of Siemens US Barbara Humptons. I love

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what she said, digital economy rides on this technology. I

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's not just the digital economy, it's completely

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>our economy. Some great reporting throughout the week on the

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com just about why you're

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing the semiconductor shortage, what it's going to take to

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ramp up. I mean, it's a global problem. It is,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that might not end anytime soon. Exactly.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week, there was though some

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>optimism from Barbara there. We just heard it. Our next guest,

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>full of doom and glue. He certainly is more specifically

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>doom the politics of catastrophe. It's the title of Neil

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson's new book. All Right, everybody, brace yourself, do it,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>do it? All right? That's coming up. This is Bloomberg

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting from the financial capital of the World, Bloomberg Eleve

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in Frio in New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius XM Chado one

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>nine team and around the globe. The Bloomberg Business app

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week Tim.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Next up, someone who gets to the bigger, broader issues

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that are facing our society. We're talking about Neil Ferguson.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He's Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He's also Bloomberg Opinion columnist and well known to our

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg audience. Author of many books including Colossus, The Great Degenerations,

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and The Square and the Tower. He looks at the

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>cracks in the American system how we got there, including

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>his newest book, it's called Doom, The Politics of Catastrophe,

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and he says, the tragedies of the past year are

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ones we should have seen coming. But it was a

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>year like many others, actually, and that's part of the

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>point of the book. It's not like this was the

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>first pandemic to strike humanity, and indeed, if you compare

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it with other disasters like World Wars, this is not

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty catastrophe. So I actually found that this

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gave me an opportunity to take a step back and

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>try to contextualize what was happening. There is a strong

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>predisposition in our media today to say that everything is unprecedented,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>which just means we don't really know the history. The

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>point of writing Doom was to remind people that, for example,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the influenza pandemic was far, far worse, killed a far

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>larger share of the world's population. Actually today this one

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is closer to the influenza pandemic, which not many people remember.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And as for world wars, which you know, my grandparents

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lived through. This is actually, although it might not seem

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that way on on TV, this is really getting off

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lightly by historical standards. What certainly doesn't feel like it

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>right now living through this because I think for a

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, and this is our first pandemic, even

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>those who were alive during the one in the nineteen

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>fifties and the very few people who are still around

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>from the one in the you know, a hundred years

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>ago at this point. But I wonder about the response,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>especially from governments like the UK in the US, because

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>early on in the book you say it's kind of

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>too simple to to say that populous leaders were early

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on were the reason why those responses from those countries

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't the right Why isn't the right way to look

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at it? Because you compare the case with Belgium, and

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Belgium didn't have a great response either. Right, the excess

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>mortality in Belgium last year was higher than in the

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>US or the UK. I think the narrative that the

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>excess mortality in the US was Donald Trump's foults, or

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil JayR ball Cinaros the UK. Now in India's

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all norandramdes Well. This is a very tempting narrative

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>because we want to kind of pin the blame on

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the person at the top. But when you look at

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the global picture, it's not quite so clear cut because

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>there were plenty of countries with non populous leaders that

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>did disastrously. Peru has had about as bad uh and

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>experience as any country, and the guy who's was in

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>president there was not a populace. He only became president

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>almost by by accident. So I think there's a kind

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of temptation to simplify this story, and the way I

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>would put it is this, In the U s. Donald

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump made a whole succession of mistakes. It's tedious almost

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to list them all. He clearly misjudged the problem in

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>multiple ways. There's nothing in my book that says he

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>did a great job. But if we think it was

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>old Donald Trump's fault that CDC completely screwed up testing

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first months of the pandemic, that we had

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>no contact racing system of the sort that they were

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do in Taiwan and in South Korea, and

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>then we utterly failed to quarantine the people that were

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>likely to be infected. That can't all be attributed to

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the President United States, who presides over a huge and

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>conflict of bureaucracy, part of which has more or less

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one job, which is to deal with the crisis like this.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think one has to say that the public

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>health bureaucracies on both sides of the Atlantic did very

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>badly compared with say Taiwan or South Korea. The fact

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that they managed to contain the pandemic so successfully tells

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>us that there was a much better playbook than the

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>one that we used, and yet we told ourselves that

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we had very high levels of pandemic preparedness. Well, the

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>other side of this coin is the country that did

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>respond well, Taiwan and South Korea, among others. What ties

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>down together? Why did they respond well well? One answer

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is approximate answer they learned the lessons of Stars and Mars,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>previous outbreaks of a new coronavirus that we kind of

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay enough attention to. But I think that's a

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>better answer, which is that these are countries that have

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>good reasons to be generally paranoid. If you're Taiwan, you're right, Nix,

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the People's Republic of China claims it. You. If your

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>South of Korea, you've got the crazies and the North

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. So I think the lesson that I

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>learned from Doom is that it's better to be generally

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>paranoid and worried about every potential contingency and so have

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>one very detailed plan for a specific crisis that doesn't

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>actually work when the crisis strikes. Thanks to Neil Ferguson

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us giving us insight into the long term

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>impact of the pandemic on both the population and also

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the global power structure. But this whole idea of a

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of this, if you look back in history, kind

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of gives you clues of maybe some of the things

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to be worried about in the future. Yeah,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the explanations for who has fared well and who hasn't

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fared so well during the pandemic. They're not as simple

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as everybody thought. No, exactly loved that conversation. You're listening

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. From one big thinker to another.

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>We're talking Scott Galloway, also a familiar name to the

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week audience. I'm just gonna put it out there.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a conversation I've been looking forward to for a

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>long time. He tackles Facebook and Apple both as you

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>know in the news this week, and which of the

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>four need to be broken up to unlock value. You'll

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>find out which war he's talking about. This is Bloomberg.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. So this

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was a conversation Tim that you and I were looking

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to for a long time in our world, and

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we know this. There are just some folks that need

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>no introduction, and that includes Scott Galloway, author of a

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of books, including the New York Times bestseller The

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and most recently Post Corona, From Crisis to opportunity. He

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>writes a lot he does. He's also, of course, a

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>professor of marketing at n y U Stern School of Business.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Some people know him as Prof G. He's also founded

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>several companies, including rent Envelope and Profit He Never Holds Back.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Also host of the upcoming The Prop G Show on

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quicktake. We had a lot to get to with him,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>including the news this week of Facebook's oversight board uphold

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a ban on former President Donald Trump using their platform

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at least for now. Anyone who is responsible for a

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>third of misinformation around a specific domain, in this case

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>election interference should be banned from the platform. So this

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is Facebook's attempt to abdicate responsibility. This oversight board, I

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think has got the charm of the Legal of Nations,

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>with the effectiveness of the United Nations. I think it's

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a total abdication of responsibility. And what they said was

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hurry up and do nothing. We're going

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to make them. It's kind of the mother of all

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>non decisions. I'm glad he's not back on the platform.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It's typical Facebook. It's it's kind of just more delay

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>an obcusation. Well, Scott how has it been so easy

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter and Snap to make their decisions about President Trump,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's been so tortured for Facebook and for Google's YouTube.

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a really interesting question. I think Google and Facebook

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent, are still trying to hold onto

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>this myth that they're just a platform. I think that

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they aren't niche companies. What's interesting is that there's definitely

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a purity trade. And what do I mean

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>by that? If you look at pinterestome Snap, they've outperformed

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>their peer group and they're largely seen as having less noxious,

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>toxic content, and Twitter, since kicking Trump off the platform

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>had sort of the strongest run in several years. So

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it appears there's sort of an immunity trade or a

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>purity trade. I think Facebook and Google still want to

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>try and cling to the notion that we want all content,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time, anyone, regardless of the damage it does,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're still kind of holding to that kind of

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>zeitgeist there. Um, they don't see themselves as niche players.

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're more they're they're less less focused

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on pleasing anyone audience, just don't want to just they'll

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be mildly upsetting to everybody you know. Sarah Fryar Bloomberg

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>News putting out a story saying that maybe Facebook has

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to provide more options for Donald Trump types, saying that

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there should be way for Donald Trump, his thoughts and

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>other Trump like figures to exist on social media with

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 1>out kind of all the amplification that many of these

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>platforms provide. These are sours words to be fair. Um,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with that that there needs to be

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>another option? If we believe in freedom of speech and

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I understand your point about misinformation, but how do we

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>treat this? Scott? Yeah, that's a tough problem. But I

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think we can inflate freedom of speech with freedom of reach,

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and that is the conversation around anti vac is a

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile conversation we should have. There are people who want

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation around white supremacy, and those conversations

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>should be had. The question is whether for profit entities

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>should have algorithms that purposely seek out that type of controversial,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>very upsetting content and elevate it exponentially beyond what it

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would get organically. Because it is so noxious, because it

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is so heinous, it creates enragement an arrangement equals engagement,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>which equals more Nissan ads, which means that Facebook gets wealthier.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, should we have business models that

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>purposely link profits to the enragement, division and polarization of

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>our society. Should there be some sort of tax but

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there's notions somehow that everybody deserves voice. These firms have,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>these individuals have massive voice. The question is, should we

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the most profitable companies in the world be engaged in

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a business model with end up being handmads this edition

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>or where a capital police officer is bludgeon to death

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>with a fire extinguisher because these algorithms are amplifying the

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>most controversial content. Let's talk about Apple versus Epic and

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really a lot of big app developers and even small

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ones too. It's playing out in court Epic Games accusing

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple in the App Store of cheating developers and consumers

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with fees and onerous rules. Scott Galloway, Um, is Apple

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>taking too much? Does Does Epic have a point here?

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Because at the end of the day, you know, Apple's

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>argument is, Hey, we are giving you access to the customers,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're making this a safe place for our customers

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to to access your apps. Yeah. I think that's the

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>argument that they've made a staggering investment to ensure safety,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and they've made a huge investment in laying down the rails,

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and they should be able to charge what they want

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to access those rails. The question is if you start

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing everything that's being transported on those rails, and you

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>see that certain goods are going to a certain area,

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and you decide wow, based on that inside, we'd like

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to start a competitive business Apple Music, and we're going

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to tax our competitor and maybe promote our own products.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you, in fact in a monopoly position? The app

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Store really is their regulatory achilles heel. I think they're

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose on this one. I would have gone further

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>than this, but this is it's very difficult to argue

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're not imposing or not taking advantage of the

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>fact they own the rails to compete with the with

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the other products that access those rails. So if in

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 1>fact there's monopoly power here at the scale, and an

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>argument that they need to have one player and that

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>size is good for everybody, then there a utility and

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>their prices should be regulated. I think they're all wet

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on this one, all right, play a little bit of

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Devil's Advocate, and maybe it's not Apples to Apple, Scott,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>But what about a Walmart that you know how it

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>squeezes its suppliers or an Amazon where it gets a

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>piece of everything that's sold on its platform. Um, I

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>know it's not, like I said, maybe an equal comparison,

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but is it that much different? Yeah? I think it is, Carroll,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think Walmart is about eight or nine percent

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of retail and the app store on iOS is about

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>eight of all dollar volume that goes through apps. So

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be a player in the app economy,

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there really is only one place, an iOS is where

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people go to actually spend money on apps.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So if Walmart gets market share of all retail, then

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Apples to Apples, all right? So listen, one thing

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. I wanted to ask you, Tim and I

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>both wanted to We were thinking about coming off of

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett and Brickshire Hathaway's annual meeting this past weekend,

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and Warren Buffett put up a slide. It was the

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>top twenty market cap global companies in it was named

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>like Toyota, General Motors, x on, IBM, six u S companies,

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fourteen from other countries. He pointed out Scott that none

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty are on today's list of the top

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty market cap companies, and he says it's a reminder

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of extraordinary things that happen in nine not the dark Age.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Is not a backward time. So I'm curious, how do

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about today's top me market cap companies, whether

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>it's Apple, Google, Amazon, you wrote about them in the

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>four Should we think in twenty years from now or

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, ten years they're not going to be

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the juggernauts that they are. Well, look, a basic truism

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is that everything everywhere eventually ends, and at some point

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies will be dethroned. The question is what kind

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of damage do they do between here and now by

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>not returning to our proud legacy of anti trust? And

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that is a T and T eventually would have been unseated,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but we went in and broke it up into seven

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>companies and we on unleash tremendous innovation, Cell Data five

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or each of those seven companies ended up being worth

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>more than the original within ten years. So my argument

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is sure at some point, everyone is dethroned. But between

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>now and then, is there an opportunity to oxygen eight

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy, to increase job growth, increased taxation, increase M

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and A by doing what we have always done, and

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that is when a company becomes an invasive species, we

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>go in and we break it up. It's overdue. Anti

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>trust is absolutely overdue. Here which companies need to be

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>broken up right now? The answer is yes, But like

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, except for Apple. Apple would be hard

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to break up because elegant anti trust means you unlock value.

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not a punishment, it's a liberation for all stakeholders.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>All stakeholders except the CEO who wants to sit on

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the iron throne of Olive westro It's not just the

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>king of the North. Apple would be tough because who

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would get rights to the brand? So Apple ends up.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You regulate the app store. But Amazon gets broken up,

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as does Facebook and Google. And by the way, I

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>owned shares and all those companies except Facebook, and we're

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all going to make money on the day of their breakups.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Talk about that, though, is it? Because you know a

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>w S by itself is more more than a w

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>S as part of Amazon. That's exactly the correct question.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>In two the most valuable company in the world will

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be an AWS. It was prophylactically the fastest growing, largest player,

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and the most profitable, most fastest growing sector in history.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>The cloud will be the stock that every hedge fund manager,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>every girl who gets her bombits that gets as a gift,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone will own a w stock. Most valuable company in

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the world in four years is AWS. It'll be an

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>n f T though right it's not going to be

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an actual certificate. We's back at it, Carroll. I know,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, well, you know you wrote about these four companies.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who are the companies? Who? Who are there?

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the technologies that you think are going to be

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of the replacement for the Apples and Google? Today

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the cloud. I get that. Are there

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>other things on your radar that you're thinking Listen, we're

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>just not talking about it enough. But these are the

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ones that are going to be the big market cap

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>companies of the future. There's a lot of incredible companies

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>an incredible technology is The unfortunate thing is it's usually

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the same players that we're the biggest unlock coming out

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic is we might have an opportunity. Virtual

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>visits to doctors went from less than one percent. There's

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>an incredible opportunity to start pushing out primary healthcare to

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions Americans and take healthcare from the disease driven,

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>defensive industry to a sense of health driven industry. That's

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a good news. It's going to create trillions of dollars

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in value. The bad news, the company that will be

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the fastest ground healthcare company in the world will be Amazon.

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>The voice is the most exciting technology. Who dominates that? Amazon?

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>The cloud? Who dominates that? Microsoft? Amazon? And oh e

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a Google. So there's some incredible companies just off the list.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>The shopifies, the rope wus, the salesforces, the Ali Baba.

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But these companies continue to outpace all the rest. A

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of big numbers doesn't seem to apply to these guys.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If we've watched Apple's earnings up fifty

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>plus per cent, the revenues the iPhone of sixty plus

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>percent sales in China, when they increase their margins and

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>their services revenue, it's just it's just staggering. That's got

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Galloway and why you professor, best selling author. If you

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>missed any of our conversation, you can find it on

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>our podcast feed at Bloomberg dot com. That wraps up

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the first hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Tim Stanovic and I'm Carol Masser.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Ahead in our next hour, we're gonna continue kind of

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>our focus on big tech, including the cover story this week,

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's on Jeff Bezos because it's all about a new

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>book by our own Bradstone. Yeah. This is a good one,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just chock full of amazing anecdotes and nuggets. Plus, as

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we just heard from Scott Galloway, Apple locked in a

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>legal battle with Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite. Why

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a once close corporate relationship has turned into a battleground?

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It certainly has. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Week inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tech news as it happened. Sloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hi,

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim Stanovic Plennyhead in our

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>second hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>including how the world's richest man beat the tabloids. We've

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>got the story behind the National Enquirers failed the tempt

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to get the best of Jeff Bezos. It's from an

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>exclusive excerpt in a new book that's coming out next week,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but there is a sneak peek in this edition of

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. It is a good one reading the excerpt,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I just want more. Plus Andy Rackliffe, the CEO at

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Front, on the launch of some new products in

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the robo Advisor. We're talking fintech disruption. First up this hour,

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley once again in the news this week. It

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>involved the beginning of a court case, and one that's

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>considered to be one of the biggest threats to Apple

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in years. It's a trial that pits the makers of

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone in Fortnite against one another, and it's in

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. We got

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>more from Business Week editor Joe Webber and Bloomberg News

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter Mark German. The battle could be a new

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>video game, I'm thinking, or like a series or a series.

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen up, everyone, Let's go back to two thousand eleven,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about a month after Tim Cook became CEO, taking over

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for Steve Jobs. In his first announcement, it was time

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to announce the iPhone for us. This was at the

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>height of the beginning of the App Store. This is

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the Apple versus Google rivalry, and

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the big new feature besides Sirie for the iPhone for

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>US that year was this more powerful processor focused on gaming.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>So what better developer to have on stage to prove

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>why you should buy the iPhone for us tim Cook's

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 1>first product, Well, at the Games they came on stage

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to show their new game, Infinity Blade two, to show

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the power of both the App Store and that new processor.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And now today, obviously circumstances between the two companies are

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>much much different. Mark, where did things go south? So

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you started to go south around two thousand seventeen, two

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen at the beginning of Fortnite. Fortnite was this

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>new key game coming from Epic. It quickly became extraordinarily

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>popular and Epic was really, you know, minting cash from

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this game and they were making close to part actually

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars a year, or they projected they would

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>be making a billion dollars a year from from the

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>app store on Fortnite. And when you're making that kind

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of money, you're starting to give Apple commissions well north

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of potentially two to three hundred million dollars a year. Now,

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Epic is a big company, but even for a company

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of the size of Apple, I think to pay out

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of pocket three hundred billion dollars sorry, three hundred million

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars before attack for that, for that income, that's pretty significant.

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's really where the relationship began. Interrupture, Mark, who's

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>got the tougher case here to prove? Oh, for sure, Epic.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is an uphill battle for epic Um,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>not because of you know, my opinion or because of

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what consumers might believe, because of legal paperwork and signatures.

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I learned very early on contracts are important,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>signatures are important, And your opinion of how horrible Apple

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>might be in this situation if you have signatures on paper,

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's a legal document in the eyes of the court,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>right in the eyes of this judge, doesn't really matter,

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, for all intentsive purposes, is Apple probably charging

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>developers too much. Yes, is Apple probably going a little

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>too far by requiring people to use its payment system

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and blocking alternative app stores. Yes, some more open platform

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like Android whilst stelf preserving privacy and a good user

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>experience would be wonderful, But all that is not really

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>relevant for this particular case. I still think though, that

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple will have to make some changes to really appease

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>developers and users alike into the future. You know, what

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be watching for in this case?

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's going to be the outcome, but along the way,

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>there might be some other things that, um, we'll catch

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone's attention. What what could some of those end up

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>looking like? Yeah, so, actually have been going through some

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the filings a different discovery and pieces of evidence,

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And one that I'm actually working on a story right

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>now about is that Phil Schiller, who now runs the

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>app Store and was previously Apple's marketing chief course firing

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago, sent an email to Eddie q

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>who's head of the App Store ten years ago in

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>two eleven, sort of floating the idea of needing to

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>reduce the app store commission. Now, this was in two

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven. If they wanted. They were talking about reducing

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the commission from because they were getting super profitable. Well,

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple didn't really make any real change to the commission

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>structure until a few months ago in stating a fift

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>reduction for developers who generate under a million and revenue, which,

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, as we all know, it's not relevant to

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>ethics because they don't make under a million a year.

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You make feel over a billion a year potentially. So

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>what are the repercussions if if Apple ends up winning

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this Because it's not just Epic that wants to Apple

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to take a smaller cut and wants more freedom to

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.959
<v Speaker 1>do what they want to do within the App store

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and on their own apps. Who else would would benefit

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>if if Apple ends up losing this case. Yeah, if

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a Apple ends up losing the this case, You're going

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to see the floodgates open. You're gonna see Spotify wanting

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a very similar deal to Epic. You'll probably see that

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>motion for that nearly immediately. Other big developers to generate

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that kind of money, you know, Netflix, Spotify, Pandora, all

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>these big players. They would be using Apple's payment system

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure, because it's a so much better user experience

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't have to give that commission to Apple.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's really what all the big guns want. They

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>want the ability to use, you know, a built in

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>payment network without giving Apple a commission. If Apple wins

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit, you're going to see a lot of developers

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>up in arms that you might be you know, a

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>stronger regulatory push from you know, antitrust officials. I really

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think that even if Apple, you know, wins this war, right,

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more to come, I know, exactly get ready. Hey,

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is Tim cooking to testify? Should we anticipate that at all? Mark?

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You should? Yeah? Tim Cook is likely to testify. Well,

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that was our guru for all things Apple, Mark German

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and a business We get it to Joel Webber. Really

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see, Carol, all of this play out in

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>court as Apple's dominance gets put to the test. And

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>remember it's his wide ranging implications that go beyond Epic,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the maker of Fortnite, could affect companies like Spotify and

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>even smaller apps. Yeah, and really the first test of

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple's dominance when it comes to their own app store.

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up, We're staying

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>with technology. We're moving from Apple to Amazon and the

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>man behind it all, Jeff Bezos, who seems tim to

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>win just about everything. Yeah, he really does. It's the

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>cover story in the magazine this week, all about a

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>new book, Amazon Unbound, Jeff Bezos and the Invention of

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a Global Empire. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinnoby

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. So Bloomberg's Bradstone is no doubt about

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the go to voice when it comes to Amazon. Wrote

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a book about the company, you might recall the Everything Store.

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Lucky for us, he went back to do more, resulting

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in his new book, Uh just coming out, Amazon on Bound,

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Geff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire. Let's

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>get more from Bradstone, Senior Executive Editor up Global Technology

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg News. He is with us from our

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>bureau in San Francisco, along with Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Joel Weber. And I gotta tell you you guys, I

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think we're just gonna do this for ten hours because

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I just want to talk about everything Jeff Bezos and everything.

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Brad's book I'm just gonna put that out there. Job.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we can have Brad. I don't

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>know if we can have Brad for ten hours, but

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but we'll take them for what we get. Isn't isn't

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this a family program? I don't know if we're we're

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>really able to talk about for ten hours. Yeah, it

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>might be a little much. So this story, um, Brad,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, we excerpted from your book is

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>one that kind of broke the internet when it happened,

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but we we only really knew. Um the part that

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 1>came out at the moment, and what you brought to

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the book and to the pages of Business Week is

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of color behind the scenes and and the

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>great untold story of how Jeff Bezos basically took probably

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what was a low moment in his life and used

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it to turn the tables. And we're talking about the

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the National enquir National Choir story that was basically about

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>his affair. Um, so, so how did you approach a

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>writing this this story and then like how did you

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>how does that tie into the book itself? Right? Yeah,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks Joel. Well, first of all, just to put it

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit of context, I was about a

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>year into writing this book, as Carol said, a sequel

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to The Everything Store, which I thought was gonna be

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a nice, boring business book about the last ten years

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and the rise of the continued rise and domination of Amazon,

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>with a little you know, ominous antitrust specter hanging over it,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and then Jeff tweets his divorce from

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie and the Medium Post and the National enquire package

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and what was left from you know, that moment Jill,

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>where you which you described as kind of breaking the

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.959
<v Speaker 1>internet was a little bit of a sense of ambiguity.

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It was like, well, wait, did the brother do it?

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Did MBS do it? Who? How did the Inquiry get

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the story? Is Trump involved? And Bezos and his his

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>advocates were very clever, I think, in in casting sort

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of political aspersions, wrapping themselves up in the mantle of

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post and the journalistic mission. And so my

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>goal as I got into it was, you know, to

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid I guess some of the sensationalism and

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and but but described you know what happened, How did

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Bezos really come out on top? As the cover says,

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Jeff wins he always seems to win, UM, and what

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>does it say about his kind of tactics? And so

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just tried to talk to everyone, get

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>close to the investigation into the whole thing by the

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>FBI and the Southern District of New York and figure out, Okay,

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what what happened and and UM, you know,

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>as as Jeff maneuvered through it, what can we learn

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>from that? So? What did happen? Did it? It didn't

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>actually have anything to do with Saudi Arabia or or

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>or President Trump, Right, that is the question. And what

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I say in the book is and it's represented in

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the in the Business Week story this week, is that

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>based on the evidence that we have at the current moment,

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and based on the conclusions of federal prosecutors in New York,

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that it seems like Acam's razor applies here. The simplest

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>solution was the was the right one? Which is that UM,

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the brother Michael Sanchez gave the story to

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer, UM. And there's really no evidence, um,

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that there were any political motives involved, UM,

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 1>or that any any international conspiracy was involved. There there is.

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say there's evidence. I would say there's circumstantial

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence that MBS hacked bezos phone. Um, but there are

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:41.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about the f t i UH,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the the agency that did that investigation, that Bezos is

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Camp hired to do that investigation. The spyware that was

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>involved is very very hard to detect. So really they

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>were looking at the increase in data that came from

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>his phone and at the time, and there's no evidence

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of evidence to the contrary their

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sworn statements that were filed in part of these cases,

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and there was evidence email evidence that shows the inquiry

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>getting the story from from Michael Sanchez and trying to

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>piece together the mystery. Who was he even talking about

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.479
<v Speaker 1>discovering it was Jeff Bezos And so you know where

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I net it out again, may maybe something comes out

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that this story so bizarre. Who knows what could happen,

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>But from the evidence we have, it really doesn't seem like,

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were there were political winds blowing around

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this thing at all, other than the fear that a

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>m I had that because of its UH you know,

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the resolution of of the Michael Cohen case and it's

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a peace treaty with the Southern District of New York.

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>They worried about being accused of having political motives, and

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that did play a role because it forced him into

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>into trying to negotiate a settlement which Bezos and accused

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>him of of extorting him. But other than that, I

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think all that stuff was just noise. I think it's

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>remarkable is that I can just imagine the PR team

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>behind it saying no, Jeff, don't anything, or whatever denied it,

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and like he just comes out, you know, fighting really hard,

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and as the cover says, he wins. Like it's just remarkable.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And the question, Carol is is like, was it And

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to this, but was he

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>deliberately manipulating kind of the world, wrapping himself up, as

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I said in the Mantle of Them Washington Post imputing

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>political motives to the Inquirer. Was that a deliberate and

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat disingenuous defensive shield or did they really think that

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there could have been this political or international conspiracy. I

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that they genuinely thought that maybe you

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>know that maybe his enemies and he does have enemies,

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Washington Post, particularly during the age of Trump

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of enemies. Um. I think they genuinely

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that there might be more to it. Um, But

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to look back and not your head. You know,

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it was super effective, right we all when you think

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about sort of what he did and the personal sort

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of trajectory there, people ended up sympathizing with him. He

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>took a stand and he brought down the editor Dylan

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Howard of the National Choir. So it was it was

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>super effective. Brad, what is this episode? What do you

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like it illuminates about Jeff Bezos as a as

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a business person, Joel, I just quickly go back to

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 1>when the Everything Store came out, and do you remember

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>they didn't like the book and they gave me a

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of one star reviews and and and mackenzie left

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>one at the time. And what struck me there is, Wow,

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he found a totally unique way, thinking outside the box

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to throw an asterix next to next to

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>that work. And I, you know, frankly, I don't think

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it was effective, but that's also what he did in

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this case. He thought outside the box, outmaneuvered everyone. Um,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, came up with this this direct medium post

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>um One, the Sympathist came out on top. He's retiring

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>now as an icon of business. He the thing that

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you learned from this is he always does things a

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit differently, and often it is ingenious. That's brad

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Stone on his new tewel Amazon Unbound, along with the

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.439
<v Speaker 1>editor of the magazine, Joel Webber. Brad's laid his book

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on the e commerce Giant goes on sale May eleven,

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a special coming up this week on

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Quick Take with him. Yeah, we're going to do a

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into the book. You do not want to

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>miss it, all right, looking forward to that coming up.

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the early fintech companies that turned upside down

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the way we invest but the environment, there's more competition.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got robin Hood, You've got so much more out

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 1>there that are going after younger investors. The world is changing. Yeah,

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it really is. I mean the mantra of said it

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and forget it. It doesn't really resonate with the robin

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Hood crowd exactly, which is probably why the co founder

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and CEO Well Front, which stopped by. They're introducing new

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>programs for their users. That conversation that's coming up next.

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial capital of the world,

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York to Washington, d C.

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius XM Chado one

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>nine team and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood founded seven years ago. Can we know this?

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>It's exploded in popularity millions of Americans looking to make

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>some money during a pandemic that has sent stock prices swinging. Listen,

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 1>this was the year, the past year that we all

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>started talking about robin Hood. Yeah, it's it's disrupting the

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>financial industry. It's a huge fintech player. But but one

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of the earlier fintech firms to really change the way

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.479
<v Speaker 1>that people thought about investing was Wealth Front. It changed

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>how investors managed their investment and thought about retirement by

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>taking it online. It introduced the word robo advisor to

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our world. I remember we all of a sudden, we're

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about, well, what's a robo advisor? We caught up

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with Andy rack Left, co founder and CEO of Wealth Front,

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he had some news to tell us about and talked

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about the changing demands of young investors. So what we

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>trust them now is the ability to customize our portfolios.

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So traditionally, what we offered was a diversified and rebalanced

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of low cost index funds, but we specified what

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>those index funds would be based on your particular level

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of risk. Now, what we allow you to do is

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to add and subtract ets based index funds, or you

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>can even build your own portfolio from scratch. So we're

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>starting with dozens of etf well, seeing Nick row that too,

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>hundreds our et s even include socially responsible et F

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so that you can express your values. And we hope

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>later this year to be able to add cryptocurrencies to

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that divers spike portfolio as well. Andy, you founded this back.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like just around it was at

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, just around the financial crisis, two thousand eleven.

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually we launched our first product in December of eleven.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:44.839
<v Speaker 1>How has things changed in terms of what investors, maybe

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a younger investor, maybe all investors, in terms of what

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they're looking in terms of how they manage their investments

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolio, especially in an arrow where it's not

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like my dad who had investments of pension, sencier security

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>VA benefits. It's going to be very different for people. Well,

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>let's see. On the positive side, I think that index

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>investing or passive investing has grown to become much much

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:12.240
<v Speaker 1>more popular. I think in two thousand and nineteen over

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>half the funds in mutual funds were passively managed. When

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we started, that was not apparent. So that's a really

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>big positive change. Every ten years or so, there's a

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>day trading crates, and it happens whenever the market goes

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>up by a very large amount in a short period

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of time. It happened in the Internet bubble, it happened

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>around the financial crisis, and it happened last year. And

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so that drives people who have not lost money through

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>day trading to try it, which means people so And

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't think this one is different, because there is

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the access to apps, commission free trading. You can do

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it like playing a game on your iPhone. You don't

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think this one is different, Well, I don't because everyone

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>loses money when they day trade, and so ultimately they

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>realize it's like putting touching our hand to a burner.

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>When you get burned on a stove, you don't do

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it again. So everyone, I think wants to try that,

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they're probably going to move away from it.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the other biggest difference is the explosion in

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the value of bitcoin and other andy what what what

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 1>do you give us an update on the on wealth

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:24.439
<v Speaker 1>fronts business? Because I'm there. Fintech is so hot right now.

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier in the show, Um, what's the

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>plan for the company? Are you guys are going to

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I p O? Are you gonna get acquired? Well? I

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was in the venture capital business for over twenty five years.

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I co founded a very well known firm called Benchmark Capital.

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that made Benchmark so successful

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>was a focus on companies that had a good chance

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of building a large independent company, which requires you that

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you go public. So that's been the desire from day one,

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately we're growing very rapidly. We have over billion

0:51:58.200 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars of ussets now under management, and March was our

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>biggest month ever in terms of investment net deposits. What's

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the demo is it still kind of skewing younger, Yes,

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>while it's intentionally skewing younger, we focus on millennials and

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z, so people forty and under. And the reason

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that we appeal to them is that everything that we

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>do is delivered via software rather than through an advisor.

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Our clients literally tell us, we pay you not to

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to us, so we don't appeal to baby boomers

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who have been conditioned to want to talk to someone.

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 1>We're fantastic if you want everything delivered via your app.

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is the right approach for everybody? Well,

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a function of the amount of

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>money you have, because the academic research is incredibly clear

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that that attempting to outperform the market through active management

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is a fool's area. That net of fees that you

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to underperform and the only three things that

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you can control or diversification, fees and taxes, which are

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>software is really really good at that's Andy Ratcliffe of

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Front look as a venture capitalist. It was so

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting to hear him, with his background in venture capital,

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about how the company is going to ultimately I

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>p O Yeah, exactly right. We kind of pushed him

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like So where are you going with this because the

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>company has been around for its quite a while and

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>your in Silicon Valley startup terms, right, yeah, exact, exactly.

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>It's all perspective. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week, coming

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>up from staying up on your finances to dressing down

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for the pandemic, or at least wearing a lot of sweats,

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>yoga pants, and as it turns out, joggers. We've got

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the lowdown on the Jogger Juggernaut at Vori from the

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO. This is Bloomberg. You wearing joggers?

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Not right now, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, everyone, hands up, Tim, you took. His hand

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is up in the air. Who has been living in sweats, leggings,

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 1>yoga pants, you know, those comfy clothes in the past year?

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Up my hand, my hand up. I mean, obviously not

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when I'm at work, and we've been coming to the

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 1>office for the last few months, but as soon as

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I get home, I throw on those comfy paths. Well,

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 1>there's one company that is a maker of the types

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of clothes we've all been living in. It's the active

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>where at leisure company. Viori, which sales skyrocket in the

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>past year, is founder and CEO Viory. We began our

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>chat like we often do, with a look back to March. Well,

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been a roller coaster. I will never forget March thirteenth,

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 1>we gathered our leadership team together and we decided we

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to close our stores. We had five retail stores

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>at the time. UM. We were getting calls from a

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of our wholesale partners saying hold shipments, don't send

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:48.719
<v Speaker 1>us any any more inventory. And by the way, we

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think we can pay our bills. Um. And so

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a rough time. You know. We made some

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>tough decisions. You know. At the time, we decided to

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>keep all of our We had over fifty retail employees.

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We decided to keep them fully employed with the company

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and reinvest in training. UM. But I was so proud

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with how our team came together in that time and

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we got really creative and we thought about how can

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we make this business better during this momentary pause. And

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what we found out was that there was a big

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:21.760
<v Speaker 1>gravitation towards comfortable clothing, and we we were very fortunate

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from that. UM. So it was it was

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a rollercoaster at the beginning, a lot

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of worry, a lot of doubt about what was going

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and then we we learned quickly that our

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>customer was coming to us. They trusted us for delivering

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>really comfortable clothes during a pretty tough and traumatic time.

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm guilty for those comfortable clothes working from home for

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, eight months for me, are so a

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of yoga ware and the like. UM, tell me

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about some of the metrics. I had read somewhere that

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys nearly tripled your revenue last year. Is that right?

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Or give me some idea of the metrics you saw. Yeah,

0:55:57.360 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we did. We we came in in the year to

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>UM with a plan to double the business, and before

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we were really close to writing it to zero, as

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we're a lot of folks, you know, in that early

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>March timeframe, but we learned that there was again that

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>big gravitation towards our our category, and we ended up

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>tripling our business, with a large majority of that being

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:20.439
<v Speaker 1>direct to consumer and so hats off to our team,

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Hats off to our supply chain for being able to

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 1>react so quickly to meet the demand. What was your

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>supply chain like, because that's something that we've had a

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversations about over the past year, where we

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>know when it came to certainly some of those essentials. Um,

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it was difficult. But what was your supply chain like

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Well, we're fortunate to have great partners,

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'll first say that, but it was challenged, you know. Um,

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, one day we called our factory partners and

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>we said, look, guys, we need to hold um all

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:51.319
<v Speaker 1>new production until we get a better picture of what

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen. And literally two weeks later we

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>called them and asked them to triple the volume of production.

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, we were working with everybody from

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>our text all mills all the way through to our

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>cut and sow factories to manage capacity and kind of

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an ever changing environment. You know, one minute we thought

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we were on one trajectory, and then the next minute

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we would get more data, putting more demand and pressure

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on supply chain. But we were able to rise to

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the occasion. And I think part of that was because

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we had adopted nimble um supply chain models that um,

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we're where we where. We partner with some of our

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>vendors to manage inventory and to meet that that kind

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of fluctuation in demand. So Joe, a friend of mine,

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when I saw that we were having you on to

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 1>like really cool guest, I hear their joggers are the best,

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tell me what's going on with jogger sales? Because this

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>has been a big momentum play for you guys. The

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>jogger has been an incredible product across all channel, the distribution.

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we've become famous for the jogger, and I

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's a combination of great fit and comfort. Comfort

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>being king this past year. Um, we have a famous

0:57:56.880 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>fabric called the dream Knit and our dream Knit extile.

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a technical fabric. It's brushed very uniquely to give

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it this incredibly soft hand and once you put them on,

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a hard time taking them off. So where

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do you go with all of this? And I think

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about I've been doing yoga for twenty years and yoga

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>clothes have gone from you know, ty tyed yoga pants too.

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They actually look pretty nice with the jacket and it's

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing how like this stuff has evolved and has

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 1>infiltrated kind of our regular wardrobe. How do you continue

0:58:29.160 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to see the evolution of your brand and the type

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of offerings that you put out there. Yeah, that's a

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 1>great question, you know. I really feel that part of

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason Jory has been successful is we've intentionally tried

0:58:40.040 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to blur the lines between fitness clothing and everyday life clothing.

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And I really feel that the term at leisure is

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just going to evolve into clothing. I think some of

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the best sportswear everyday clothing, whether you're wearing it around

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the house or you're traveling, or you're going to the office.

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of that product is being made

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and conceived today by activewear brand. And I think that

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our offering, you know, is extending beyond

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>product you're just going to take to the gym, but

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a product that you know you'll travel in your

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ware to the office. It's it's closed that you'll you'll

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:14.440
<v Speaker 1>go hike and be active outdoors in and it's just

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>transitioning into you know, clothing. It's it's the new definition

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of clothing because it's more comfortable, It moves with your

0:59:21.640 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>body and it just functions better. How are you and

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys write about sustainability on your website. That's a

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 1>big deal and we have been increasingly certainly on our

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>program here looking at the fashion industry and the use

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of water and you know what it does to our environment.

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys are focusing on recycled and also organic materials.

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You're committed to sustainability in terms of your materials by two.

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a big part of your ethos. Does it cost more?

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about getting there, because we are increasingly seeing

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 1>more and more companies doing it. Is it hard to

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>do it? Is it costlier? Tell me about that. Yeah,

0:59:56.160 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it costs money, so it requires investment. Um. But we

1:00:00.160 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that's it's a great r o I. But that's

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>not the reason for doing it. We did it because

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the natural world was what inspired the brand and we

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure we're doing everything we can to

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>protect it. And so yes, you you mentioned recycled and

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>organic materials by two, we're on path to meet that,

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>um that goal, but we also invested in a lot

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of different green initiatives talks that of our carbon footprint

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for the past two years UM, and yeah, those those

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that requires dollars to do that. We're also investing in

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in going plastic neutral, so UM we calculate all the

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>plastic that we put into the environment and we take

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>equal if not more plastic out of the ocean. So

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>all of these require effort and require energy. It required dollars,

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but we believe it's the right thing to do. And

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, building a brand in alignment with a value

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>system is really important to us and I think it's

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really important to our customers as well. And where do

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you mostly manufacture? Well, there we work with a supply

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>chain that's that's mobile at this point, Asia, Cambodia, Vietnam,

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka, So we're we're diversified globally well. And it's

1:01:08.960 --> 1:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting And I do wonder too about UM. That's certainly

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the E s G kind of framework that

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we are increasingly looking at when it comes to companies

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and certainly investments. UM. Are you gearing towards places where

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>workers are treated more equitably and and get a fair wage.

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a whole sourcing team UM that spends a

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on our code of conduct UM and

1:01:34.760 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and being very clear with the value system that we

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>expect our factories to operate within. And it's exciting because

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the more brands that are taking this next step in

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of E s G, the more the supply chain

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is being responsive because the best factories in the world

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:52.479
<v Speaker 1>want to work with the best brand. If the best

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>brands are caring about this stuff, then they are as well.

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And so the more more energy, the more we vote

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>with our dollars, the more the factory pay attention. UM.

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And so we're not only demanding it, but we're also

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the best factories coming to us with

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really cool new program um. And that's really inspiring to see. Yeah,

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely interesting to hear, and it is inspiring. Hey, one

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to ask you after a year of

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>many of us being kind of casual, I'm still wearing.

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Also some genes at work I do change for when

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to be on air. But um, there is

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a thing we talked about revenge buying where everybody can't

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wait to spend money. But there is also something like

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>sweatpant fatigue that you guys are noticing. How is that

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>shifting Maybe some of the things that you want to

1:02:31.640 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>put up in terms of product offerings in the next

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>few months, especially the world reopens. Yeah, it's a great point.

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are already seeing our product UM focus evolved.

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>UM sweatpants are still growing for us as a category,

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's contribution to the overall businesses shrinking. So we're

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing people move into athletic shorts, you know, our technical

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sports where for traveling products that you can wear on

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the golf course or to the office. They're trending really

1:02:57.440 --> 1:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>strong right now, and we don't see that slowing down.

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think in general the movement towards healthy,

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>active living is going anywhere. And I believe that the

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>clothing that we make UM is very much aligned and

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>supports that lifestyle. And so while the products that we

1:03:13.800 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>buy might evolve a little bit out of say kind

1:03:16.120 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of sweatpants relying on the couch, UM into other forms

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of active where I think in general people are still

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for comfort, versatility, UM and performance. Yeah. I think

1:03:26.920 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I think people are whittling down to and

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and really want kind of a wardrobe that just makes

1:03:31.120 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sense with kind of who they are and and their work.

1:03:33.480 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys going to stay private? Do you want

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to go public? There's a lot of money out there,

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there's SPACs. Is that part of the timetable at all

1:03:40.280 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the next year or so. You know, we're paying attention,

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we're getting we're getting educated on the public market, but

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have not made any kind of UM statement,

1:03:50.200 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>intor or initiative to move in that direction at this point.

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We're so focused on growing the business. The business is

1:03:55.800 --> 1:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>going to double again this year. We're getting to a

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty sizable scale. We have four hundred and fifty employees

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>UM and so we have our work cut out with

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for us building kind of a back end engine that

1:04:06.280 --> 1:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>can support the front and we're very excited about what

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we're doing with our product pipeline. We're going to be

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>expanding nationally with our bory retail stores UM and continue

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to invest in sustainability. So we have our work cut

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>out for us. That's Joe Coodlave, the founder and CEO

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of Theory Joggers. I do have joggers, Carol their joggers.

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have their joggers. My wife got me a

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>pair a few years ago from my birthday. They are

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>comfy and you love them. I do. I gotta put

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that on my two buy list. That wraps up the

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovak. Be sure to tune into our Bloomberg Business

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily show Monday through Friday. It starts at two

1:04:40.920 --> 1:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also

1:04:43.600 --> 1:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>watch us on our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News and check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

1:04:49.520 --> 1:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You can find it at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. You can also find Carol's

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>recent chat with Nancy Wilson of Heart out now with

1:04:57.320 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>her first solo album, I Loved It, Carol, it was

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we fund to catch up with her. I gotta say

1:05:01.800 --> 1:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. It's available on newstands now, at Bloomberg

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com and on the Bloomberg Terminal. You can also

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>see me at Bloomberg Quick Take available at Bloomberg dot com,

1:05:09.160 --> 1:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>slash qt, and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV, Samsung TV,

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and more. Have a great weekend. Stay safe everyone. This

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg