WEBVTT - A Bazooka to Kill an Ant.  Lanhee Chen talks to A&G

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:08.079
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Jetty Show, both the Democratic later on

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the White House Chief of Staff now indicate they think

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>President Obama's problem was that he was too bipartisan. If

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>he was meeting us half away, he's a he's a

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>damn poor judge of distance. So old Kennedy getting his

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>folksy shots in. Um, I'm I'm annoyed that one of

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bending sprees we've ever gone on in American

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>history and world history, UH is getting so little discussion

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and comment. And I agree with pundits who say the

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans did a terrible job of standing up for the

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>other side, explaining to you know, people, what's in the

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>dang thing and why they should be against it. I

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think because a lot of them didn't understand what was

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in it, or they they realized, Hey, the polling shows

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>people want check. So we're just gonna focus on that,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>which is only a tiny portion of the two trillion

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar thing that got signed into law yesterday. It's law, now,

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's over, and UM, I'm just very unhappy about the

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. I wonder, I wonder if people are gonna

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>come to know what's in it. One of the biggest

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>remakes of our welfare system in our nation's history. The

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>whole tying work to welfare that Bill Clinton ushered in

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Biden voted for is now over. We're remaking

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot a lot of the way

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we look at society, and nobody's paying any attention. Well,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a number of things to say, but first

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>let's introduce our beloved guest, lawn Chen David and Diane Stephie,

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>fellow in American Public Policy Studies at the Hoover Institution

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Director of Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford University

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lan He. How are you, sir? Good morning, gentlemen. We

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>understand you've got any vicious argument with somebody on cable

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>news this morning. I don't know about a racist argument.

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I just, uh, you know, gently reminded the host of

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the audience that you know, you've got one point nine

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in spending, very little conversation about what's in

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the bill, a constant effort to frame this as, you know,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of bill that's really targeted to those in need,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>when in fact what it is is a It's one

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of the largest pieces of spending in American history. Uh.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>For a bunch of really what are progressive wish list

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>items disguised as a COVID release package. I mean, that's

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. I think people would be a

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit less upset about it if if folks just

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 1>leveled with us every once in a while and told

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>us that, you know, actually this is the vehicle we

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be used to pass a bunch of policy,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have been able to pass other one. Un

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's really what this is about. I heard one pundit

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>say that this bill is adjusted for inflation larger than

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the spending of the New Deal during the

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression. Have you heard that I have? And let's

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not forget guys, this comes on top of four trillion

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars spending we put it in the economy last year.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>So you've got, you know, another fifty percent on top

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the four trillion that we did last year. So

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just I don't even know where to

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>go with this anymore. We know immune to it. You

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>were just immune to it. You know, nobody really cares.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And all you hear is people out there saying, yeah,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>spend the money, spend the money. People need to spend

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the money. Well we were. So it's funny your emotions

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to be similar to ours, where it's just like

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know where to go now. I mean,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if you can, if you can pass through into law

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest spending bonanzas in our nation's history,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and it just hardly gets any discussion at all. The

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of things like that, that welfare thing that I

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about. That's the sort of policy that

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think takes months, if not years to debate

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in Congress and on cable news in an op ed

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>pieces for it to pass, and it's happened, and nobody

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>even knows it's even in there. Well. Two things. One,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>even during the height of the recession back in two

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, Congress still debated what the recovery package should

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>look like for months. Uh, this thing was done in

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a matter of weeks, maybe not even that. The second

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is, I don't think anybody would have any problem

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>at all if you came forward and said, look, we

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>want to do a package tailored at people who are

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>still suffering because of COVID, whether because they've had COVID

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or they've gotten caught in one of these lockdowns or

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they've lost a small business. I'm totally fine with targeted

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>assistance that looks at people who really needed it. But

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they went and they created essentially a giveaway program for

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>people making up to a hundred and sixty thousand dollars

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a year. Now, tell me how that makes any sense

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at all. If you had said to me, look, we're

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>going to do a package that's targeted at the lower

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>income distribution and really make sure that people who are

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>unemployed get back on their feet, totally fine, and I

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think you would have gotten thirty Republican votes for that

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>at least, maybe more. But when you go out and

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you basically take out of bazooka to kill an aunt,

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this is why people get worked up about it, because

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not reasonable. What we're doing is simply not reasonable,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's being disguised as relief, which I think is

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult thing of all in all of this, right,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the painful part to me is that what you're saying

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>is is clearly true, but most of America has no

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>idea it is happening. You know, they have used the

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID as an excuse to pat to reform American society

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and the relationship between the people and the government financially,

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and they know exactly what they're doing. And I just

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think the Republican messaging is so bad, so floundering. And

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>part of it is that, you know, Trump sucked so

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>much of the oxygen out of the room. But you've

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>got Kevin McCarthy, who's he seems like a nice enough guy,

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's just mediocre. You've got Mitch McConnell, who doesn't

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>look like the brave conservative leader who's gonna take us

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>into the future. It looks like the guy who's gonna

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>cremate my aunt. I mean, just who are who are

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the exciting leaders? Well, you know, I think, um, I

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's a couple of things here. First of all,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys are you make a very good

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>observation about Trump, and that is that because Trump was

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the center of attention and he did suck so much

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the oxygen out of the room, there really was

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for the last couple of years it was really kind

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of Trump or are you against Trump? And we really

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't take the time to develop during that during that

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>period a sort of certainly on the fiscal conservative side,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't develop a a real bench of people as

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>well as a set of arguments that could resonate with

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the American people. And I think that's a problem also

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>because there was some hypocrisy over the last couple of years.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>A most Republicans to you, and all these Republicans stepping

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>up ready to spend money because Trump was president, and

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and and that quite simply. You know, people look at

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that now and even people who are skeptical about this

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one point nine trillion dollar bill say, well, where were

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys, you know, two years ago when Trump was president?

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, they would be right to level

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that argument, because I do think the hypocrisy is what

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.679
<v Speaker 1>bothers people. It's it's not so much that the idea

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to stand up for fiscal conservatism. It's

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you only stand up for fiscal conservatism

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what it's politically compete, and that I think is a

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>big problem. Wind Chan of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the line. Mitch McConnell made the point on the

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>floor the other day that that four trillion dollars that

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we spent last year, uh in four different bills, all

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>got like eighty votes in the Senate nine votes in

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and in the House. I mean they were

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>way bipartisan. So I just find that interesting on its face.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But as some of this complaining, like, um, you know,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm one, I'm the losing coach here in the n

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>C Double A tournament, and I'm complaining that and the

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>other team every time they got the ball, they ran

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>down to the other end faster than us and put

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it in the basket every time. We're just mad that

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they are better at us and beat us. I mean,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side's got the votes, they had the chance

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to ram it through. Would I be unhappy if my

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>wish list got rammed through on fifty votes while nobody

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was paying any attention. I got all the immigration stuff

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and Social Security reform and all the things that my

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>wish list all got through. Would I be unhappy about that?

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Yeah. Look, they didn't do anything illegal, right,

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they did exactly They did exactly what they

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>had to do. They used the procedures and processes available

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to them because they have a majority in the House,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a majority in the Senate, a functioning majority Senate, and

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they have the presidency. Right, So what does that tell us?

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>That tells us that elections have consequences, and we've talked

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about this before, guys, I mean it is. It is

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true that there are policy implications and ramifications to

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>every election, and you're seeing it now, and so you know,

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do anything on toward They did exactly what

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>probably politically one would have told them to do. Of course,

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you would have hoped that they could have gone together

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>with Republicans on this, because everybody loves it, as I've

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>noted earlier, at some level, to give away money. I

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>am sure if they came back and said, look, we'll

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>do a trillion dollar package. We won't do this, giveaway

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the multi employer unions, we won't do this, giveaway a

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>three dollars to states in local governments who largely don't

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>need it. The Republicans with us, that's fine, Well, let's

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you have your fourteen hundred dollar checks. Even if you

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>want to give it to people who are making almost

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>two hundred grand a year, that's fine. Republicans probably would

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>have caved on that, but they didn't even bother right that.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats just said, look, we have the votes, we

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have the political tail with at our back. We're going

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever we want to do, and they used

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the properties of their advantage, and you know, more power

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to them. So we just have a couple of minutes

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>left on here. I accidentally kind of watched the entire

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>speech by President Biden last night, and it was alternately

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it was like you know, day old room temperature oatmeal,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>interrupted by like biting down on a rock every minute

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half, like excruciating pain, interrupting them, boredom and distaste.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you happen to watch that? I did? I did.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's you know, this is this is who

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this is Joe Biden, right, I mean it's the same

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of speech he's given, uh, you know, every other

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>time that he's been president. It's the same speech he gave,

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know when he did set piece speeches during the campaign.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of what we've come to know and expect

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>from him. Yeah. It was just heap and helpings of

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>mother love, which I don't need from the federal government,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>interrupted by half truth and lies about opening up the schools.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And then the long and short of it was, if

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>you follow all the rules and you wear the masks

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>in the resident you can have three people over on

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>July of the fourth and I'm thinking the ten of

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Rangers are gonna have a full stadium in two weeks,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're telling me I can invite a couple of

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>friends on July the fourth. F you, Well, I'm living

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>my life. God, I hated it. Well, this is this

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is the whole thing that bugged me about about the

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>entire kind of public health establishment is day you know,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they're giving this guidance, which is it's guidance that feels

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>about like six months old, right, and people at that point,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect people to do? It gives people

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>realistic guidance. If they've been vaccinated and they're hanging out

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of other people who have been vaccinated,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then it seems to me that they can pretty much

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>do life as normal. They shouldn't be subject to all

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of these rules and restrictions. And in California we see

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the extreme form of that. Right. It's it's the it's

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the guilty and the shaming if you don't wear a

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>mask everywhere you go inside, even if you're hanging out

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with like people that are in your family that have

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>well been vaccinated. So you know, this is something I

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.119
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of those things where public health professionals

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>really have gotten this one wrong, and unfortunately their guidance

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been helpful in many cases. And of course the

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media just praised the speeches as somewhere between Churchill

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Gettysburg address made me want to vomit. Lani

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Chen of the Hoover Institution Stanford University, were always grateful

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>for your perspective on he thanks, thank you. Great to talk.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard him because he's a he's one of

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>those people that's just kind of always optimistic and looking forward.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard him so down about something. Is that

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar bill pasant with nobody paying any attention

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or caring what's in it? He does you know if

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a policy guy like him, I mean, he's the

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of guy that sits there with his sleeves rolled

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>up late into the night crafting policy for candidates and

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. When you find out that, oh no,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all we needed to do is have the majority, and

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we could have done anything we wanted, just written in,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, make things great and ram it through. Um.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>That's all you needed, no complicated arguments. I want to

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>frame this moment in American political history. We need to

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>take a break. But when I come back, I am

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>going to frame it. It's going to include a reference

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to Hitler, but it will not be a cheap and

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>tawdry reference to Hitler. It will be solid. Did you say,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell looks like the guy who's gonna cremate your aunt.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He seems like an undertaker. He doesn't. It's like and

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>his manners that of a which short of Urn would

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>miss contain your beloved ranch remain. I mean that's his manner.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I realize he's a genius a strategy in the Senator whatever,

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of like bringing people to conservatism and

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>rallying them and getting gong. Oh no, forget it, please,

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Urn in the middle a