WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US CPI, UK Real Estate, Asia Tech Earnings

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend,

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>our global look at the top stories in the coming

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>week from our Daybreak anchors all around the world, and

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead on the program, we look ahead to some

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>key inflation and retail sales data here in the US.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carolyn London for We're digging into the challenges

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>facing commercial and residential real estate out of a major

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>conference in the French Riviera.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>to earnings from China's contemporarate Apparax technology, number one in

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>its industry. How is it doing in navigating China?

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 4>He Love on Free Own, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 4>to one, Washington, d C, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio, London, Serrius

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 4>XM one nineteen and around the world on Bloomberg Radio

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 4>dot com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>today's program with inflation. We get key CPI data for

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the month of February this coming week, which could potentially

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>influence what the FED does at its March meeting. Joining

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>us now is Stuart Paul, Us, economist with Bloomberg Economics.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for having me. Tom. Yes, we are looking

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 5>forward to getting our February CPI data, and we are

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 5>also going to end up getting retail sales data for

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 5>the month of February in this coming week. And our

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 5>basic view is that bit of a resurgence in spending

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 5>helped to create a bit of an inflationary impulse. We

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 5>are expecting to see the headline CPI index increase zero

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 5>point four percent month on month for the month of February.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 5>That's the same as what we saw in January, and

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 5>that is a very hot print and definitely inconsistent with

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 5>the Fed's two percent target. That's going to hold annual

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 5>inflation at three point one percent. It's year over year

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 5>core inflation. We're expecting to register zero point three percent

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 5>month on month, allowing headline inflation to fall to three

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 5>point seven percent year over year. We are expecting to

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 5>see some disinflation and core goods, with use auto prices

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 5>declining about two percent during the month, but consumers are

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 5>still spending and that will support nominal retail sales growth

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 5>during the month.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So one bright spot you mentioned was use

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>cars a little lower. However, housing gasoline and food, I

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know they fluctuate, but they have been a little higher

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>than usual. Is that kind of driving a lot of

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that inflationary pressure.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>That's right, So driving the headline really is gasoline prices.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 5>On a seasonally adjusted basis. We have gasoline prices rising

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 5>about four percent during the month, so that's after accounting

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 5>for the seasonal adjustment factor. Is that typically would account

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 5>for the increase in gasoline prices In februaries people start

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 5>driving once again as they clear snow off the streets,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 5>for example, so in some places, so not only is

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 5>gasoline driving headline, inflation is also driving nominal retail sales.

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 5>We are expecting to see retail sales growth about zero

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 5>point eight percent month on month. A big part of

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 5>that is gasoline, and we need to account for that.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 5>If we look at a narrower control group, however, which

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 5>strips out autos, strips out gasoline, strips out building, materials

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 5>and food services, which is very heavily influenced by foot traffic,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 5>which can be affected by weather, for example, as we

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 5>saw in January, very affected by weather. If we focus

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 5>on that control group, we have a much more modest

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 5>growth of zero point two percent month on month in February.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, are some of the retailers doing better? But then

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>now January, we know that was a very rough month

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for retail sales. Could have been a hangover from the

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. But February you're expecting a little bump ahead,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bump up, not a decline like we saw

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in January. Who are the winners in that besides gas stations.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 5>So if we look at credit card transaction data and

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 5>we look at debit card transactions and just strictly count

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 5>the number of swipes at credit card processing terminals at

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 5>the point of sale, we do see big box retailers,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>We do see some just general merchandisers showing some of

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 5>the most impressive growth month over month. But we need

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 5>to be a bit cautious in how we read through

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 5>from that one month of improved credit card transactions data

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 5>and what that means for the broader economy. We are

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 5>seeing some headcount reductions at retailers. That typically was something

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 5>that was concentrated just in more high skilled services. But

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 5>if it's making its way to retailers, that could be

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 5>a signal of retailers feeling a little bit of the

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 5>pain or anticipating a slow down and spending, which is

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 5>actually what we expect throughout twenty twenty four.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's go back to inflation. Just not even two

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the inflation rate was nine point one percent.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now we're expecting a year of a year rate

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of about three point one percent.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 5>Or three c three point one percent for the headline

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 5>three point seven for core.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're moving in the right direction. Last week, FED

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Chair Jerome pal and his semi annual testimony to Congress.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He said that central bank no rush to start lowering rates,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but he hinted that when policymakers feel inflation is under control,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>could happen later this year with no firm timetable. Is

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he being optimistic? Is he looking at the data? It's

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all data driven according to the Fed. Are we heading

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>toward that now?

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 5>I think we are. We're anticipating seeing headline inflation reaching

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 5>about two point five percent year over year at the

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 5>end of twenty twenty four, As headline inflation comes down,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 5>the balance of risks that the Fed has to weigh

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 5>between achieving its maximum employment mandate and its price stability

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 5>mandate come into better alignment. And so as we see

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 5>the pace of hiring cooling, as we see the pace

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 5>of inflation cooling, the Fed has to take its employment

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 5>mandate a bit more seriously, has to put a bit

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 5>more weight on it. And so we do expect the

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Fed to begin cutting rates this summer. Again, economic activity cooling,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 5>inflation cooling, and the labor market at cooling would allow

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 5>for that pivot in policy.

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And the next FED meeting the nineteenth and twentieth of

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this month, So we should not expect any rate cut.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But you think we'll get a little more clarity from

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed about what they're thinking.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 5>I think that we'll get a little bit more clarity

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 5>on the pace of quantitative tightening, for example. But I

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 5>expect the Fed to actually maintain a bit of a

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 5>hawkish tone in its policy statement. It did remove its

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 5>quote unquote hawkish bias in its January policy statement, but

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 5>I expect the Fed to use language that would prevent

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>people from reading too deeply into the idea that rate

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 5>cuts are imminent, or from expecting rate cuts to be

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 5>imminent less financial market conditions start easing too swiftly, and

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 5>the Fed would have to then treat loosening financial conditions,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 5>perhaps with more restricted policy or higher for longer policy.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, well we'll get ready for that. Well, our

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Stuart paul Us economists with Bloomberg Economics, turning

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>now to too closely watched earnings reports that are out

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, which will offer investors a glie limps into

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the mania surrounding artificial intelligence technology and for more on

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what to expect from Oracle and Adobe. We welcome Bloomberg

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence technology analyst anarag Rana. Thank you for being here at.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 6>RAG Oh I'm happy to be here.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh good. Well let's start with Adobe, which may be

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>best known for its Photoshop editing software Acrobat Reader and

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>its PDF but boy as it transformed itself into a

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing giant with its generative AI product Firefly. So

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting to see in the first quarter

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings out on Wednesday? And why Yeah?

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 6>So you know, when you look at somebody like Adobe

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 6>that dominate the creative space with the Photoshop and other

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 6>products that go into it. They also dominate the document

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 6>cloud business or digital documents with PDF. So those are

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 6>the two areas where we see strength going into the QUOTO.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 6>So document cloud, I think that's done very well. We

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 6>continue to expect strong results on that segment. The big

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 6>discussion is going to be on the creative part of

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 6>it because there is a lot of chatter around what's

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 6>going to happen to companies like Adobe when you have

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 6>products that are you know, launched by companies like open Ai.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.559
<v Speaker 6>So I would recommend if anybody hasn't seen the Open

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 6>Eye's latest demo of their product called Sora, I would

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 6>would recommend go to YouTube and check that out. It's

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 6>a phenomenal product where you just write down the tex stuff.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Let's say, you know, two armies fighting in a in

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 6>a battlefield, it will create a video for you and

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 6>that's done. I mean, you can use that. Now. There

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 6>are a lot of concerns about privacy and copyright and

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 6>other things, but we can you know, that's that could

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 6>be settled later. But since that video was released, Adobe

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 6>has been a lot under pressure. So I think on

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 6>the conference call, we do expect management to talk a

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 6>lot about what they're doing with their AI capabilities, et cetera.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned Firefly. Firefly is an interesting product, but it's

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 6>mostly to pictures, which is text to you can write

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 6>down a text to say, you know, create a picture

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 6>of a dog playing piano in the in a forest,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 6>and it'll create that for you. They have done a

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 6>good job of, you know, rink fencing that issue by

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 6>launching their own product, Firefly, And on top of that,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 6>they actually have agreements with the creative professionals who own

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 6>a lot of those underlying pictures on which these models

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 6>are trained. So they're basically telling companies you can use

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 6>the pictures generated from our system and nobody's going to

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 6>sue you for it because we have rink fenced it

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 6>with copyright issues. So I think is going to be

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of discussion on that topic. But i Adobe,

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 6>in our view is on the right path of jen

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 6>ai and over the next few years we should see

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 6>significant improvement in their products.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And over those next few years is their main competition

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be the open ais and other AI startups

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of the world.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 6>It is a mix of open ai and other startups

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 6>of the world. There is another startup in Australia that

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 6>has been behind them called Canva. We just had their

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 6>co founder on our podcast. That's a good product and

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 6>also it's a slightly cheaper product. So it's going to

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 6>be hard for Adobe over the next few years to

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 6>put in new price increases through their ecosystem. They have

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 6>been growing well with price increases over the last I

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 6>would say, a couple of years, but I think it's

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 6>going to be challenging going forward.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, on Thursday we hear from the enterprise software

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>giant Oracle what are you looking for in its Q

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>three report.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Oracles actually a very interesting story because it has two

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 6>big businesses. One is the application portfolio of software company

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 6>or software products such as HR software, or customer relationship

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 6>software or finance software. And the other part is the

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure business, which is their database business as well as

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 6>they also do a bit of cloud computing. I think

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 6>they given such strong demand for a cloud infrastructure to

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 6>run these large language models, the biggest focus for everybody

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 6>is going to be what happens in their Oracle cloud

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure numbers. I think last quarter investors were a little

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 6>disappointed by the growth rata that and the company came

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 6>out and said, well, listen, we don't have a problem

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 6>with demand. The issue we are having is we don't

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 6>have that much capacity to run that demand. Whether it's

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 6>in the reason, could be the data center expansion is

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 6>a bit slow, or they don't have enough chips from

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia to run those workloads. So I think then everything

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 6>is going to rotate around what's the capacity right now

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 6>for them to run that work But other than that,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 6>I think it should be a normal quarter for them.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 6>I'm not expecting any major surprises other than the topic

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 6>we discussed.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, you said that supply not demand may be an issue.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean also businesses are still spending, still growing.

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a very good question. I think by and large,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 6>businesses are stabilized in the downdraft of it spending that

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 6>has been going on for two years, which means it's

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 6>not getting worse, but it's also not getting faster at

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 6>a quicker rate. The one area that's not you know,

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 6>in that bucket is anything that's spent on AI. So

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 6>they are spending a lot on AI, but they may

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 6>not be spending on other areas such as you know,

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 6>sales automation or marketing, advertising, et cetera. Those software products,

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 6>but as far as AI products are concerned, there is

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 6>a pickup and spending.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot to look forward to and our thanks

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst anurag Rana, and coming up

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll dig into the challenges

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>facing commercial and residential real estate ahead of a major

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>conference on the French Riviera. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>look ahead at the top stories for investors in the

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>coming week. Tom Busby in New York. Up later in

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the program will look ahead to earnings from a couple

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of key tech manufacturers in Asia. But first, the real

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>estate world, both commercial and residential, has been struggling under

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the weight of high interest rates, and the cracks are

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>seeping into the financial world as well. Flexible working has

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>changed demand for offices, while many European countries are struggling

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with a shortage of housing. All these issues and more

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>will be in focus at a major real estate conference

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>on the French Riviera in the coming days. For more,

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>anchor Stephen Carroll tom.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a subject that has huge political and economic importance

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>real estate. High interest rates have created cracks in the

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 2>commercial property market that are now rippling into the financial world.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Home Buyers are also dealing with higher borrowing costs, while

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>at the same time facing a shortage of housing In

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>many major cities in the UK. The latest data from

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 2>morgus Lander Halifax shows a continuing small rebound in house

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 2>prices despite higher rates. We spoke to Kim Kenny heard

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>from Halifax about the risks that she sees in the

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 2>market this year.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 7>I think mortgage rates clearly are focusing everybody's minds. We've

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 7>seen real volatility in them, and we saw significant rate

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 7>increases over the course of last year. We're starting to

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 7>see that ease now and as we've said, there's bier

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 7>confidence beginning to return. I think I would say, you know,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 7>more broadly, it's just we still remain in a fairly

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 7>uncertain economic climate, so I think there are lots of

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 7>things that we need to be thoughtful about. At the moment,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing really good wage inflation, we're seeing low unemployment rates,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 7>and those are good indicators for us in terms of

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 7>the long term performance of the market. But I think

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 7>we've learnt over the last eighteen months or so that

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 7>there is still uncertainty in the marketplace. So do you

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 7>see the instability for the housing market in the next

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 7>few months?

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 8>Is that the prediction to the end of the year.

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 7>As we're kind of facing into this year, I think,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 7>as we said, we think that house prices could by

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 7>up to two percent. But clearly what we have seen

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 7>in the last five months is consecutive growth, so that

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 7>should be seen as a real positive and we hope

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 7>that continues to grow and also that we can teach

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 7>to see stability.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's Kim Kennyhard from Halifax on the situation in

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the UK for home buyers from an investor's point of view.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>We've also been speaking to Michelle Scriminger, who is CEO

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of Legal and General Investment Management. She's been talking to

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>us about the opportunities in the drive to build more

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>homes in the UK, particularly affordable homes.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 8>We operate in different sectors of the market, so we

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 8>are a house builder. We operate in the build to

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 8>rent sector, we operate in the affordable homes sector. We

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 8>also invest into commercial real estates on behalf of multiple investors.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 8>We also learned as part of what we do here

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 8>in the UK. We're not just doing it in the UK.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 8>But I think what we definitely see is continuing to

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 8>see opportunity and that for us is super important. And

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 8>as the regulations are changing, so Solignty two is a

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>very big thing for Legal in general, and the ability

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 8>for us to be able to deploy more capital we

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 8>want to unlock the capital to invest means that we're

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 8>going to be continuing to do that around the UK.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 8>So we think there is opportunity. Of course, the rates

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 8>environment is it part of that. So you know, as

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 8>rates become more stable then I think that does start

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 8>to make people more confident and let's point to that

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 8>as a point of resilience here for the UK on

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 8>which we can leverage. But individuals are still being impacted

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 8>by those high rates in terms of mortgages and fixed

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 8>rate mortgages are a challenge, so that there is a balance,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 8>but longer term we do see a lot of potential here.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>That was Michelle Scomjo, CEO of Legal and General Investment Management,

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>speaking to Bloomberg's Caroline Hepger that all of these issues

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>are in focus at the MIP and real Estate conference

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>that's happening in can on the French Riviera in the

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>coming days. Our real estate reporter Jack Sitters will be

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>there and he's been telling us about the big subjects

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 2>up for a discussion.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 9>I'm fascinated to get out there because I guess if

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 9>we wind back twelve months, I was there in can

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 9>and at the start of the week, Silicon Valley Bank

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 9>had just gone, and I was anticipating, you know, talking

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 9>to investors about that all week, And by the end

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 9>of the week, Credits Fist has gone as well, and

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 9>so it was just it was incredibly chaotic, but also

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 9>incredibly interesting revealing to be there with all those investors

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 9>and get to see the wides of people's eyes and

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 9>sit down with them as this madness was unfolding. Here

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 9>we are twelve months later, and although that US regional

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 9>banking situation has maybe calmed down somewhat or bit we'll

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 9>see what happens with New York Community Bank or but

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 9>the issues haven't gone away for real estate, and if anything,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 9>they'd come to the form more. It's such a slow

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 9>moving asset class. Prices take a long time to correct.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 9>That means issues with over indebtedness take a long time

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 9>to emerge, and then banks maybe take even longer to

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>actually do something about it. What are the issues, Well,

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 9>it's how much distress is really out there, how a

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 9>lender's going to respond, how tough are they going to

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 9>get with borrowers? What's that going to mean in terms

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 9>of forced asset sales? You know, are we seeing funds

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 9>that are under pressure with people trying to pull their

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 9>money out. So I'm anticipating, you know, the mood is

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 9>likely to be as dour as real estate ever gets

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 9>because I'm yet to meet anyone who property yeah, who

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 9>isn't an internal optimist. So I'm definitely sure every broker

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 9>I meet will tell me that we're right around the

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 9>corner for good times and that you know, the market's

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 9>going to bounce back, And to be fair to them,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 9>there is a good argument that maybe people like me

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 9>will be focusing on some of the more painful distressed elements.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 9>That there's definitely this sense that with interest rates having

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 9>peaked and cuts on the way, that there could be

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 9>quite a big bounce back. So for those with capital

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 9>to deploy, you know, they'll be out there looking to

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 9>do deals they'll be excited to start deploying that capital.

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Because prices have come When you think about commercial estate,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.959
<v Speaker 2>prices have come down significantly. I mean, where where are

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the bargains to be found for those.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 9>That do have the money?

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, Well, I guess it's a global event, but I

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 9>guess it's dominated by by European investors. So if we

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 9>if talking about Europe, the UK is probably corrected the

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 9>most and the most quickly, which is what we normally see,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 9>and it's to do with sort of nuances around valuation

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 9>approaches and whatnot. So you know, London, for example, prices

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 9>have come down sharply and the issue really is about

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 9>availability that that bid ask spread has narrowed. What what

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 9>often happens at the start of a correction as you

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 9>just get this huge bid ask spread. As you know,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 9>nobody wants to sell at a discount. They've got their

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 9>sort of backward looking book valuations, but buyers want to

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 9>pay a price that reflects where the risk free rate

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 9>is now. Anyway, that process has sort of been unfolding

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 9>in the UK for the last well almost two years now.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, so the conditions are there potentially for a

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 9>bit of a bounce back in terms of activity. Debts

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 9>may be a little bit more available than it was,

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 9>it's a little bit less costly than it was, so

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 9>it can be a creative for some buyers. And that's

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, that's so important in real estate. If we

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 9>look across other markets, I'd say Germany is probably the

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 9>other end, and that's the other really big market in

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 9>Europe that is at the other end of the spectrum.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 9>It things are still really great, see their huge gap

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 9>between buyers and sellers. But we are seeing you know,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 9>more insolvencies, there more administrations and that will inevitably force transactions.

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that we will actually see more deals activity?

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Are we picking up off a base there?

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 9>Off a base is the phrase.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>It's the space if you keep looking down.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean we're talking about in almost every market at

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 9>least the lowest transaction volumes since the global financial crisis.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think actually London recorded one quarter that

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 9>was the lowest since about two thousand, So you know,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 9>it did get really quite extreme in the sort of

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 9>aftermath of Russia Ukraine and as they say that bit

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 9>are spread opening. But yes, it is coming back. We've

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 9>seen volumes increase sort of quarter on quarter over the

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 9>last few quarters. And again, you know, it's you always

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 9>have to take a pinch of salt with the brokers

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 9>who you know, whose bread and butter is transactions. They

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 9>need those deals to make their fees. But if you

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 9>talk to them, they and they are the closest to

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 9>the market, they will tell you that, yes, it's going

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 9>to be a quiet first half, but they can see

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 9>the conditions there and their report boughting on potential sales.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 9>They try to persuade investors to come to market for

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 9>the second half of the year and they see a

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 9>bounce back there.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you're expecting a strong sales pitch at this

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>event as ever. Yeah, and what about the question of

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>demand post pandemic. We're shifting into sort of what looks

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>like a more stable dynamic in terms of flexible working.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>When we think about demand for officers, how much is

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that playing into the picture given the kind of weak

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 2>financial backdrop.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 9>It's a huge question for real estate, you know, offices

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 9>being the biggest sort of asset class within commercial real estate.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 9>If you look at what happened to retail, which you know,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 9>probably twenty years ago, used to be the sort of

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 9>glamour sector within commercial real estate, these huge shopping centers

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 9>worth you know, potentially multi billions, totally upended by e commerce,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 9>huge amount of value destruction that's actually now finally found

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 9>a floor, and you know, these those things as trading

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 9>very cheaply, but at least the rents have kind of

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 9>hit a bottom and they're starting to grow again. All

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 9>sorts of concern about you know, we are we on

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 9>the same journey now with office having been sort of

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 9>disrupted by well, initially by we working before the pandemic

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 9>in the way that we work and what people expect

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 9>from an office, and then accelerated by the pandemic. I think,

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 9>as ever, with these things, there's a lot of nuance required,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 9>the sense that you know, the good quality stuff in

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 9>the best locations, the greenest stuff. There's still going to

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 9>be a lot of demand for that, and actually there's

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 9>more demand than there is availability because there hasn't been

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 9>enough of it built. And I think that'll be another

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 9>big theme at miip HIM, like the lack of construction

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 9>that's been going on. But yeah, the older stuff, you know,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 9>your regional office buildings, your suburban office buildings, especially those

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 9>that you know, maybe aren't the greenest, they probably don't

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 9>have a viable future as an office, and then you're

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 9>starting to think about, well do the economics actually work

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 9>to turn them into something else? So these things just

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 9>need to get bulldozed.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the couple of interesting points there. I mean that

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>idea of making buildings greener essentially more energy Fishing is

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 2>another big challenge facing the sector too, because there are

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>building regulations that are affecting how the future life and

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>also how the new projects are going to be shaped.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, and and again that'll be a big theme at

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 9>mip HIM. It's an interesting event because it always attracts

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 9>a lot of politicians, a lot of policymakers, and to

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 9>some degree they are not necessarily the main event. The

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 9>reason everybody goes there isn't the thing works, is because

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 9>it attracts the investors. So you've got all the biggest

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 9>sovereigns will be there, all the biggest private equity firms,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 9>and if they're there, then their brokers are there, their

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 9>bankers are there, and then the developers are there, and

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 9>you know there's this ecosystem, this chain, and the politicians

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 9>as well. They're there because they want to attract these

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 9>people to come and invest in their cities. This time

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 9>there may be to a greater extent some of the

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 9>investors listening quite carefully to what the policymakers have got

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 9>to say around some of these sustainability issues, because it

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 9>is going to be potentially a huge influence on you know,

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 9>things like that office market. How stringent are these rules

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 9>going to be in you know, in the UK they

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 9>just talk of offices not being allowed to be rented

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 9>out unless they're what's called EPC A or B by

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 9>twenty thirty. You know, you're talking about the majority of

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 9>the office market being illegal to rent in six years

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 9>time if that were to actually come in, So they

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 9>will have a huge impact on the market. So I

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 9>think there'll be maybe a bit more of a two

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 9>way dialogue. It sometimes is.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 2>What about the question of housing? Of course, not as

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>much of concern around building as there is around commercial

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 2>real estate, but still a sector that there's a lot

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of political and policy kind of perspectives We had.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 9>On Yeah, absolutely, and you know, someone who's been going

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 9>to mip him for ten fifteen years now, it's interesting

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 9>how much more prominent housing is at the event. It's

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 9>a huge part of it now, and I guess there's

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 9>a couple of dynamics there. One, you've got the fact

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 9>that really across Europe there's almost no city that doesn't

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 9>have a shortage of good quality housing, and they're all

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 9>grappling with it in different ways. Some places it's planning,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 9>some places it's rent control that are barriers, and so

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 9>that's lots of issues there to be grappled with by

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 9>policymakers and by potential investors. The other thing is that

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, we talked about the kind of obsolescence in

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 9>shopping centers and maybe what's happening now to offices. What

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 9>you've seen investors do is that money that maybe they

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 9>used to invest in retail or they used to invest

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 9>in offices, and now increasingly they want to invest it

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 9>in living very broad so that can be rental apartments,

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 9>it can be senior housing, nursing homes, whatever you like,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 9>but living broadly. The difficulty that they have is actually

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 9>deploying that capital because there isn't the existing stock to

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 9>go and buy it and building it is very difficult

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 9>because the rules wherever you look in Europe are complicated

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 9>and they make it hard. So again that's a huge focus.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 9>All this money that wants to get into European housing

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 9>of various forms, but so many barriers to it.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Bloomberg's real estate reporter jacket sitters. I'm Stephen

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Caroll in London. You can catch us every weekday morning

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, but getting at six am

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>in London and.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>One am on Wall Streets. Tom, Thank you, Steven. And

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend and look ahead

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to earnings from a couple of key technology manufacturers in

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Asian I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. I'm Tom

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Busby in New York with your global look ahead at

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. This week,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>two big companies will be reporting earnings. We'll take a

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>look at how the EV market is performing through the

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lens of previewing battery maker Catl's earnings. But first we'll

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about one of the major Apple suppliers, Han Hi,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>also known as Fox KHN. For more, let's get to

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break Asia co host Doug Krisner.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Tom.

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 11>In the coming week, we'll get fourth quarter earnings from

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 11>the world's largest contract electronics maker, Han high precision industry.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 11>This company is known internationally as fox KHN. It's a

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 11>major assembler of iPhones and other Apple devices. In fact,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 11>Fox Cohn gets more than half its revenue from Apple.

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 11>To help us preview the Fox Cohn earnings, I'm joined

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 11>from Taipei by Jane Lanhi Lee, Bloomberg Tech reporter. Jane,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 11>thanks for being with us. So we know already that

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 11>fourth quarter revenue was down by nearly five and a

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 11>half percent. And I saw that figure and I'm wondering

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 11>how much of it reflects the challenges that Apple is faced.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 10>Oh, it absolutely reflects Apple's challenges. Fox Con makes about

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 10>seventy percent of the iPhones for Apple. A lot of

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 10>that is manufactured in China, and if China sales aren't

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 10>doing well for Apple, then that'll reflect immediately for fox

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 10>Con as well. And the problem we're going to see

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 10>going forward is that Apple iPhone sales we reported last

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 10>week dropped twenty four percent in the first six weeks

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 10>of this year, and that's according to Counterpoint Research, and

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 10>that already puts Apple behind Vivo, that's the number one

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 10>selling brand in the first six weeks of this year. Huawei,

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 10>which is considered China's tech champion, and they came out

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 10>with a new phone, the May sixty pro late last year,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 10>and that has been selling gangbusters because there's a wave

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 10>of patriotic buying. And then Honor, which is Huawei's previous brand,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 10>which kind of split off, and then Apple now which

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 10>used to be the top selling brand in China is

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 10>in fourth place. That will have an impact on fox

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 10>con sales. And during the earnings call on the fourteenth,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 10>investors and analysts are going to be focusing on outlook

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 10>figures and outlooks or a color coming from the company

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 10>on how much of an impact that's going to have.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 11>So we know that Apple is facing a lot of

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 11>challenges as you just said, in terms of the China market,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 11>and we know at the same time that the company

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 11>is moving to try to set up manufacturing operations in India.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 11>Is this something that fox Con is involved with the

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 11>Indian facilities?

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 12>Oh?

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely. Fox Con has been announcing almost every week or

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 10>every other week. I'm sitting here picking up announcements on

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 10>the Taiwan Stock Exchange about hundreds of millions of dollars

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 10>that fox Con is moving to India to get those facilities.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Going.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 10>Bloomberg report did late last year that fox Cohn has

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 10>won approval to invest up to two point six billion

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 10>dollars in India. That hasn't yet shown up in a

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 10>reduction of investments in China, but going forward, the percentage

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 10>of Apple products that fox Con manufacturers outside of China

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 10>will grow for sure.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 11>Do you think fox Con right now is beginning to

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 11>sense the need for greater diversification. I know they're involved

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 11>in the production of other electronic components and the networking

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 11>equipment as well. Are they moving more aggressively to try

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 11>to diversify away from being so reliant on Apple?

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Well?

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean that two point six billion dollar India investment

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 10>is already a clear signal that it is diversifying. Fox

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 10>Con is the top electronics company in Taiwan. There are

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 10>other major Taiwanese contract MANUFAC, and all of them are

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 10>in fact diversifying away from China. The Taiwanese government is

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 10>supporting that as well. So there are places like in

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 10>addition to India, Thailand and Vietnam, other Southeast Asian countries

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 10>are seeing an influx of investments, and Bloomberg last year

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 10>also sort of graft out the move of suppliers, and

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 10>there's a clear increase in Apple suppliers in Southeast Asia.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, wasn't Fox Cohn involved in developing electric vehicles? If

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 11>that's the case, are we likely to get an update

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 11>on that movement sometime during the course of this analyst

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 11>call on the fourteenth.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 10>It's possible. There's a lot of interest in Fox Cohn's

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 10>electric vehicle business. In fact, some analysts say Fox Cohn

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 10>is trying to reposition itself as an EV company going

0:30:55.760 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 10>forward as it diversifies away from just being the iPhone maker.

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 10>But you know, the iPhone still make up for a

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 10>big chunk of its sales and EV really it's in

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 10>its infancy and there have been several missteps in the

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 10>last year or two as it tried to get its

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 10>EV business going. So that's still a big question mark

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 10>and we'll have to see this year if it gets

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 10>any big business. I'm keeping an eye on the US

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 10>to see if there are any US brands that might

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 10>decide to manufacture evs with fox Conn. Investors will definitely

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 10>be looking out for that.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 11>Jane, thank you so much for helping us preview their

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 11>earnings from Fox Cohn. Jane Lonhie Lee is Bloomberg Tech

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 11>reporter joining from TYPEI. Now let's get to the other

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 11>co host of Daybreak Asia, Brian Curtis.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Doug Contemporary Amparex Technology or CATL, is set to deliver

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter results in the coming week. Bloomberg Intelligence expects

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 3>to see solid revenues and cost control at the battery maker,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and it says that will offset lower battery price and

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the slowing Chinese economy. Putting it all together, BI suggests

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 3>that the company will deliver resilient results. Now, of course,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 3>when we look at catl's business, a lot of other

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 3>issues come to mind. The health of the EV industry

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in China, stiff competition among EV makers, there US China relations,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>EU China relations, carbon reduction targets, as well as industrial

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>overcapacity in China, and even mandates for the use of

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 3>electric heavy duty trucks. Well, to unpack all of this,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 3>we have Bloomberg's transport reporter Danny Lee with us here

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 3>in our studios in Hong Kong. So, Danny, how is

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 3>CATL managing through these many crosswinds that we have at

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 3>the moment in China.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, what we're going to see in its upcoming fourth

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 12>quarter full year results is not just resilient sets of results,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 12>but one that could also be a record on the

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 12>net income line. Particularly when it comes to the full year,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 12>it's very robust, as they have before the gain from

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 12>the benefits of the past three quarters, but even on

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 12>the fourth quarter, at the final quarter of the it's

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 12>looking very very strong and they've given a wide margin

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 12>for potentially what could be a record quarter ultimately. And

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 12>so despite the falling prices of lithium and nickel, for example,

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 12>these raw material prices actually are a good thing for

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 12>someone like CATL as they can become even more price

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 12>competitive on its batteries and also just to sell at

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 12>much lower price and.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Not only a leader in China, but maintaining a top

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>position really in the global market. In the month of January.

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Just looking over some research from sn Research out of

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 3>South Korea, CATL with roughly forty percent share of the

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 3>worldwide battery market in January. It supplies automakers like Tesla, BMW, Mercedes,

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Benz and Volkswagen. The number two is BYD. It's a

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>big competitor and obviously a big make of evs. But

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about catl's position vis a v competitors and

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 3>whether or not we might seach some sort of consolidation coming.

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 12>There is a question and that always has been in

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 12>the recent years over consolidation not just amongst battery makers,

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 12>but even across the auto space, across the whole brands

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 12>which have launched running out of money. But when it

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 12>comes to the battery space, you see this concentration even

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 12>amongst the top two c ATO and BYD, and therefore

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 12>it's very hard for other suppliers to really gain ground,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 12>gain market share. And so when you have someone who's

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 12>financially strong and as robust as c ATO in particular,

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 12>they can use their financial muscle to squeeze margins and

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 12>squeeze suppliers on costs and also just to get that

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 12>edge over other smaller supplies who cannot be as financially

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 12>flex as c ATL.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it generally considered to be a really well managed company.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 12>It is, indeed, and when you look at what it

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 12>has been doing to lay the groundwork, it has made

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 12>long term bets, even during this period of instability and

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 12>weakness in the EV market where clearly not many people

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 12>are confident about the near term demand. But Ultimately, they've

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 12>made bets, they've invested, and they've put themselves in a

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 12>position where they've conquered China, just like byd has in

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 12>the battery space for cars. They are now pushing very

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 12>much abroad. But clearly there are headwinds when it comes

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 12>to its reputation and how it's perceived and how it

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 12>wants to be a supplier across the world.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>It does actually seem Danny that the glide path for

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 3>c ATL globally, while as you said, fraught with some

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 3>difficulties over geopolitics, so it's pretty good because the pricing

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 3>is not quite so competitive elsewhere as.

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 12>It is in China, right, Yeah, absolutely, I mean with

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 12>China and with someone like c ATL, they really have

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 12>a lot of advantages when it comes to being able

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 12>to sell batteries at much lower prices, and thanks to

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 12>the falling prices of raw materials, they can continue to

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 12>lower its prices. And when you do have other battery

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 12>players around the world who are still just starting up

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 12>or they've still got higher costs that they need to

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 12>factor in, so there's not a lot of room to

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 12>maneuver for competitors, and for someone like c ATL, this

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 12>is their moment to say going for the kill rather,

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 12>but they really are able to show their dominance and

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 12>show not just their dominance, but how good their products are,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 12>because what we have seen over the past couple of

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.479
<v Speaker 12>years is then putting out even better performing products, which

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 12>whether they be faster charging or have longer range, these

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 12>are things which gives them an edge on all fronts

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 12>frankly compared to its piers.

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 3>So you talked about the input materials being down and

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that leads to the ability to lower battery prices. What

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 3>are some of the key factors behind this fall in

0:36:58.040 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 3>battery price?

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 12>It is a good question, and I think it's just

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 12>we've seen with the speculation and the rush for these

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 12>raw materials over the years, it has really helped push

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 12>up prices. And again when you see the concern about

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 12>the long term supply that's all being locked into over

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 12>recent years, that has helped push up prices. And we've

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 12>seen the general demand for electric vehicles come down and

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 12>so therefore naturally prices for the raw materials that also

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 12>coming down. But we haven't really seen a flaw yet

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 12>in the price, you know, pulling back from near record levels.

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 12>But ultimately what we are seeing is the supply chain

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 12>for evs being laid out nicely, and we are seeing

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 12>more sales. Still growth, but maybe not as good as

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 12>it once was, but we are least seeing a normalization,

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 12>which is I guess good for everyone from companies to consumers.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Danny, thanks so much for joining us. Bloomberg's

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 3>transport reporter Danny Lee with us here in our Hong

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 3>Kong studios. I'm Brian Curtis along with Doug Krisner. You

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 3>can catch us every weekday here for Bloomberg day Break Asia,

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 3>beginning at eight am in Hong Kong and eight pm

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom, thank you, Brian. That does it for this edition

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>at five am Wall Street time for the latest on

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>business headlines are coming up right now.