WEBVTT - Friday Flight - Purging Pennies, Financial Fights & Phantom Wealth #945

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Had of Money. I'm Joel, I'm Matt, and

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>today we're talking about purging pennies, financial fights, and phantom wealth.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't hear phantom Joel, and not think of Phantom Planet.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever listen to a pandom planet back? And

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 2>then what did they do the theme song for the

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>O C California? Oh yeah, or even Phantom Limb. I

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>never really watched that show, Phantom Limb. That was a good,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>good Chin's song. Oh okay, yeah, you didn't watch the

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>OC back. You were like a touch younger than me,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and so when I was in college, like we would

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 2>have OC watching parties. Oh yeah, because there's only like

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>two sets of friends who paid for cable?

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it wasn't it basically like a modernized version of

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Beverly Hills nine or two went?

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Now? Okay, yeah, I've never really gotten nostalgia as I

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>think back. But now this is our Friday flight, a

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>quick sampling of the different stories we've come across, and

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>we're specifically going to address how they are going to

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 2>impact your dollars. But Joel, so you want to try

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to get everybody on like this beef jerkey train. Now

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>that you're as you might try to brainwash everyone into

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>thinking that meat it's the only category of food that

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you actually need in your life.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to get behind that, although I do think

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I would get bored if like meat was my own

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>league food group. But I think it belongs with the

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>most meals Matt.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, five meals all meat, and then on the six

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>meal you throw a little bit of brocoli in there, right,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly normally all year old.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not quite that extreme, but a couple of my

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>buddies have started making their own beef turkey. It's specifically

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>South African variety called Biltong, and I had it samples

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at their house and I was like, Okay, that's pretty delicious.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Let me give this a go, and I will link

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to the YouTube video that I used and that they

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>used to figure out how to do this.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>The guy explains that he walks to it really well,

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>send me the link, because I've had your Biltong and

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing. It's good, and you've been withholding the deats

0:01:59.320 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>from me.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the video, like he like Crystal Clear, walks

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you through it super simple, incredibly inexpensive. You don't really

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>need any special equipment, like literally the coolest parts about.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 2>It, Yeah, the fact that, yeah, you're explaining how yeah.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you need a smoker, right, which is

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like hydrator or anything like that. You can you can

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>like legit, just cure it and then hang it up

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in my pantry, is what was My wife was like,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? Looks a little wild, It looks

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a little sketch, doesn't look safe, but the final product

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is pretty darn tasty. So and when you think about

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how much something like beef turkey costs, even at a

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>place like Costco, it's crazy expense, so expensive.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>So this is like.

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Denser, better, you know everything, It's going into higher quality stuff.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>I could not believe. So Kate I had a Christmas

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>stocking stuffer, uh huh, and she got me a couple

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of packs of like some of this fancy oh I

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 2>wish I could remember the name of it, but it's

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>like this fancy beef jerky that she picked up at

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Whole Foods. So I thought, you could say BUCkies not

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit nicer than that. But she forgot to

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>scratch off the price tag and I went to you know,

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>g I was like, oh, thank you know that cracked

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, oh my gosh, it was so

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I could not believe how much does the bag it was?

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 2>It came down to something like ten dollars an ounce, Wow,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>which is crazy. Yeah, and uh, it's not apples to

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>apples though when you're comparing it, like, obviously it's going

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to be more affordable when you do it at home.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>But like when you think about price per ounce of

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>meat or price per pound of a traditional hunk of meat,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 2>like what did you just say? Oh, you have to

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>dry this stuff out, so you are losing weights as

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you go through the aging process. How many days did

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you ge it? By the way, about five days? Awesome?

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And so in the week get cut in half. So

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>let's say ask you twenty five bucks for two and

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a half pounds of beef.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So really you're looking at pounding a quarter.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well no, that's after after those five pounds of.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>You already calculated it down. It is like a concentrated

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>amount of food, which is part of what's attractive about it.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>You got some of those concentrated flavors. But I like

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>what you said too, I've got a snack out there

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>on the hiking trails, Yes, exactly, Well, because typically I

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>would rather. I'm like, all right, would rather have a

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>juicy steak, some try tip or some jerky, some built

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>on your case, and I'm probably gonna typically go with

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 2>like the juicy, but like, like, I mean, if you're

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>traveling though, if you're on the road, if you're hiking,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>that's a great opportunity to bring along your little stash.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't weigh much of some of this high quality meat,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and so the quality of it. You don't have preservatives,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>which typically that's what you're gonna find in some of

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that you buy on the shelves in order

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 2>for it to remain shelf stable. And it's not like

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you're keeping this around for months and months now you

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>don't need it, there's no preserve. The lasts for like

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>three weeks, four weeks in the fridge, so and then

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>it only gets better, right, No, like a dry dry

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>age rabbi where they have to like cut mold off.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>That seems weird. Hopefully we're not going to get to

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>this point. I don't know.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's fun to have a new hobby, and it's

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>fun to have a hobby that tastes.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Good, that's delicious that also ends up saving you a

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>ton of money. If you are a big fan of

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the beef turkey or what makes it built on versus

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 2>regular jerky bats. Good question. I do think beef tricky.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe what sets out apart is that you maybe are

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are dehydrating it in some way.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's dryer. Because what I try some years and

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>it was more like cured meat, like.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere in between, kind of like a salami and a beach.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 2>It's like something you get on a shark utery board. Yeah,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it still has some moisture. Yeah, Yeah, it was totally legit.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 2>I was really impressed, especially given that it was your first.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>But something that the two of us have talked about

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 2>for years now is how worthless pennies are. Pennies mattered

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot more like a long time ago, right

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 2>like even decades ago, but digital payments have essentially killed

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the need for the penny to exist. But then on

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>top of that inflation as well. They're expensive to make,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>costing multiple times to mint that's the proper word for

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 2>creating pennies than what they're actually worth when they're put

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 2>into circulation. They cost something like three point seven cents

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>per penny to create.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And I know my Grandma remembers the time when pennies mattered,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're just not living in that time.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>No man. And so one of the orders within the

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>flurry of Trump administration executive orders is to order the

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Treasury Secretary to stop making new pennies. And this is

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>something that's been proposed by Republicans in the past, by

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Democrats as well. We are not sad to see the

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>penny go the way of the Dodo bird. I think

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>this should be slam dunk easy thing for everyone to

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 2>get behind. Who's clinging to the penny? Who are you?

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Who are these people who say, no, please, please keep

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the penny around. Nobody picks up pennies anymore. They becomes

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>hoby value. I don't even pick up pennies anymore. And like,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the kind of I'm the guy that likes to

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>find money on the ground. Oh yeah, but the things

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you have brought home that you picked up off the

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>curb are are weird and various.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>But you don't pick up pennies, you know what. We

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>live out in the burbs, though. If your folks put

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff out on the curb, they just throw it away. Yeah.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's something I noticed about living in the city,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>folks are I don't know, are folks more frugal and.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>More conscientious about it getting a second life. But out

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>here folks are like, I just sent it to the landfill.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess there is nicer stuff with the good will maybe,

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>or oh that's it. I think the good wills are nicer.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're doing with it, they're donating it. Yeah,

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, sorry to cast a spurs burd folks, but okay,

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>so matter if we get rid of the penny, do

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we also need to get rid of the nickel. It

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of opens up that can of works. Where do

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you stop the culling of the coins, which actually would

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have been another.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Good days forget.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Like, once we start talking, I realized, well, so CNN

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>had an article about nickels too, and how much of

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem they might be. So CNN's like, hey, now

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to go hogwhile on this and that basically

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the cost to make a nickel is and I was

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>shocked to see this. I didn't realize this because the

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>penny thing has been well documented. But apparently it cost

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen cents to make a nickel, which is.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>A little less than three times whereas the penny is

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a little more than three times.

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, but still like the gap is insane between

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of money to make a dollar amount

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or send them out. Yeah, dimes and quarters at least

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>are worth more than they cost to manufacture. But not

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>only are these coins expensive relative relative to their worth,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but they slow down transactions. I and maybe I shouldn't

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get annoyed, but when people pay with cash and coins

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in front of me, now I'm at it does it?

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Just it irks me a little? And I want to

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be like yea with the times.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But that's it's a part. I need busy on the go.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I got places to be I need to get over

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that people to see, beers to drink, right exactly. The

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>National Association of Commedian Storts agrees with me, I think,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>because they, for instance, would like to see small coins

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>down away with because it does add more time at

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the cash register. And as one economists put it, Matt,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they said, when people start leaving a monetary unit at

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the cash register for the next customer, essentially they're citing

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's insignificance. The unit is too small to be useful.

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think pennies have been too small to be useful

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, and I'm not sad to see

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>them go zero tier shed over here.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Well okay, so one practical use that we have for

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>pennies and nichols is do y'all ever play thirty one

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>with the kids? The card game. It's a good game,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>straightforward enough for them to understand. You know. It's like

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>where the aces. Aces are worth eleven points, face cards

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>are ten on you try to get thirty one and

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>if you do games over, everyone loses. Okay, the game.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 2>The goal of the game is to not lose, essentially,

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 2>and you can call it whenever you want. The goal

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>of most games, well, no, some games of the goal

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 2>is to win. But the goal in this game is

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to be good enough to not lose. And we used

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>to use pennies and nickels and dimes and stuff just

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>as a way to keep score kind of. But lately

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>what we told them is like, hey, you need to

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>come to the table with your own money, because it

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.599
<v Speaker 2>provides they got more skin in the game and it

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>makes fun a little more interesting. So I would be

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>sad from that standpoint. I would maybe hoard some pities

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and nagles just to be able to have on hand

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to facilitate game playing.

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we should say this doesn't mean the

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>pennies are going away. It just because you won't print

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and create new pennies.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 2>But eventually, what that's going to mean is that over time,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna get they're gonna degrade, and they're gonna be

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>They're all gonna be in the cacation and in people's jars,

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in their closet, in the game closet. Yeah, exactly. Okay,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>since it's Valentine's Day, let's talk about fighting with your partner, buddy.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully you can not like I'm trying to avoid that,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>so your business partner, but yeah, we're talking about romantic

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>partners here. Hopefully you can avoid that. But a new

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>survey finds that a third of couples are uncomfortable talking

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>about money at all in the relationships. And on average,

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>couples argue about money something like fifty eight times a year,

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>which is a lot if that's more than once a week.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>So no wonder their reticence approach the subject of money

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of personal finances, and on one hand arguing it's not

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the worst thing in the world, right, I think it

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>depends on what the argument looks like. I think healthy

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>arguing can be productive. It shows that you care about something,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know what's worse to argue about something in

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a healthy or productive way or just to just not

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>care at all, to where you're not even bringing it up.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Can I share a little anecdote. I remember my pa,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>my grandpa, telling me that he and my grandma never

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ever fought, and so I was like, oh, that sounds awesome.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like fighting, so I'm hoping for that

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing in my relationship. I remember telling Emily that

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>early on, and she laughed at me and said that

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.479
<v Speaker 1>was really dumb and sorry, but we're probably gonna have arguments,

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's true we have. But I agree with you,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt that I think just studying expectations of relationship, I

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. I think arguments have been productive for the

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>most part for us, although not always, but yeah.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>For the most part. It shows you care, and I

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>think at least one of the ways to help maybe

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>change the dynamic within a relationship is just to agree

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on some shared dreams, to cast a vision of what

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you want your future to look like. I think it's

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be easier to cut back in other areas

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>in life in other ways, and when you're shooting for

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the same goals, when you can recognize that you're on

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the same team trying to achieve the same things. Yeah,

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>just something to keep the money. I guess.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I just do hate that people argue about money so much.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, And I think a lot of those arguments

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>are not terribly productive. And part of that is because

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been enough of that sort of team mindset,

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's probably a separation of finances, but in the couple, right,

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's like, hey, this is my money I'm bringing in,

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's your money. And that's happening more and more as

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>couples get married or come together at a later date,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they've already kind of amassed a certain amount of money,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe bought a home, maybe made some investments, and it's like, well,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this is mine, that's yours, And then it's really hard,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, to kind of pull in the same direction.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And the truth is, another way to fight less in

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your marriage or in your partnership is to combine finances more.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't rocket science, but the more you overlap

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>finances when you're married, though, the more transparent you make

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>your money, and the easier it is to work together.

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times just wrote an article about this.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>They found that or couples are segregating their finances, which

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is something that we have definitely seen, especially in the

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>questions we get from our listeners, and that makes it

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>harder to navigate. But there is research out there saying

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be the best way to

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>move forward. The Journal of Consumer Research found that couples

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>who combine finances they're happier, they're more committed to one another,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And to me, this shows that there's mutual trust built

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>up when you're pulling in the same direction and when

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you have that added transparency. So I think seeing those

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stats about fighting about money, well, if you want to

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not be a statistic, if you want to fight less

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>about money, or you at least do want those more

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>productive fights instead of the ones where you're just at

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>each other's throats, Combining those accounts, dreaming big together, that

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is at least part of the solution I think for

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>most people.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 2>I love it man. Yeah, so we don't often plug

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>other people's podcasts, but we're both fans of honestly, that's

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Barry weiss Her and her team over at the Free Press.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>But she just had an episode where she had this

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>an expert on talking about relationship little advice, and it

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 2>was fascinating that her prescription one of her recommendations when

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>it came to love and sex as well, but it

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>was much more traditionally conservative in nature, and she even

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>admitted that, hey, I grew up very progressive, very you know,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>left leaning, very liberal, and based on the research and

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>what she found, she essentially like recreated from the ground

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>up this way of approaching relationships that is traditionally very conservative,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and it was all based not on like religion or

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>anything like that, but just based on the evidence, based

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on stats and the success of relationships and the benefit

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>to society and how benefit women and children as well.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>It's super fascinating. If you haven't listened to that one,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd recommend checking out. Okay, let's talk about paying for college.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>We saw an article where Bloomberg was highlighting the fact

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that many parents are investing within bitcoin for their kids

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to opting for you know, the good old

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>traditional investments in a five nine plan. And the reason

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 2>is that they think that returns on traditional stocks aren't

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be good enough to fund the high cost

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>of college, so they're taking on a bit more risk here.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's true that the inflation on college tuition has

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>been crazy over the past few decades, as well as

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the fact that your term stock market return predictions aren't

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>necessarily all that rosy. And in addition to that, only

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin it has been brilliant since its inception if you

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>look all the way back.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so how many better investments over the past, like

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what twelve fourteen years?

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>So you take all three of these things, kind of

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>stir them together in a pot, and you might come

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to a conclusion that, like, hey, bitcoin is the way

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to go, But you can't buy bitcoin inside of a

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>five to twenty nine plan, so you're missing out on

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the tax benefits of that particular account. If your state

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>offers a five twenty nine plan, a good one with good,

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>good investment options and low fees. But the five twenty

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>nine is better than it's ever been now thanks to

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>new rules about it being able to be converted into

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a wrath down the road. And so we are a

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 2>bit more bullish on nine plans then we used to be.

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>So just keep that in mind. It might be this

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>might be a good instance to keep those investments a

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit more separated. All four. If you are interested

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>in bitcoin, sure have a little bit of exposure for

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>yourself and even your kids. I think that's totally fine

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>as well, but as always, just keep that limited to

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>five percent of your overall portfolio and maybe don't co

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>mingle those investments with the money and the funds that

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you're looking to pay for college with.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess I just get nervous about people saying, no,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the ticket to pay for my kids college.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing these headlines about bitcoin to a million. One

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is gonna be worth a million dollars in the

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, and that sounds great. And if

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that comes to pass and you have some exposure to bitcoin,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic for you, right, But I would just be

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>nervous about putting all my eggs in that one basket.

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and we would.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That's just part of diversification, right, is to not have

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>all those eggs.

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>In one basket.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you're overly allocated to bitcoin and you're missing

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out on the tax breaks and just the greater diversification

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're investing for your kids future, I can just

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>see that coming back to bite you in the butt.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, we have no money leftover for college. Man.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>There's another article about, speaking of college, how personal finance

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>courses are becoming more normal, not just in high schools

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>across the country, which we've seen a lot of growth

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in there, but in colleges, and how schools like UNLV,

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>cal Berkeley, and Stanford have them and they're working to

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bring more to campuses across the country. Actually, the Stafford

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>course is taught by friend of the show, Adam Nash,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who's been on the guy who runs Data, the.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Donor advised fund platform that were fans of.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and it's interesting, like not everyone has to

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>take these courses, unlike many of these high schools where

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's mandatory, but they seem kind of cool and Adam

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Nash is the way he explained his course, and I've

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>looked through kind of the documents, like his syllabus, and

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I love kind of his approach to talking about personal finance.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And the truth is a country, we just need more

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>personal finance help altogether. Even brilliant students out a school

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like Stanford, they don't come to college knowing personal finance

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>inside and out. And most of them just don't have

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>much knowledge on that front. And personal finance is getting

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>more complex as the financial system gains more complexity, and

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows Matt, I think the real solutions is listening

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to how the money is free nine to nine. That's right,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's free. And uh, we're funny and great and just

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to be.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 2>With, funny ish sometimes we're cringe. But my problem it

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 2>does come down to the cost. And I think that's

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>my biggest personal hang up with especially gosh, personal paying

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>for personal finances, finance classes and those credit hours cost. Yes,

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, really, we're gonna I'm going to fork out money.

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I wanna pay money to like an Ivy League college

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 2>in order to teach my kids how to save money.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I have a hard time not thinking that that's a

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 2>total waste of my money.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I would tell today, not because I hate personal finance,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>because obviously I love it, but I would be like, no,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>let's how about you read this book. Let's come with

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>our own curriculum. Here's a couple podcasts you can listen to.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>That everyone has that ex experience, has that upbringing, or

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>parents who have that upbringing as well to where they're

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>even talking about it as a couple. They're within the family. Yeah,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's not rocket science. The basic formulas to spend

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 2>less than you make, invest the rest and then listen

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to hown of money for all the rest of the details.

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, And there are a lot of details, and

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>we talk about a lot of the details on this show.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's it's The basics are certainly not rocket science.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 2>But you should stick around and listen to more amount

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of money because it's the right prescription for what ails

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you on the personal finance front. Yeah, you get beef

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>curing tips from Joel.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So many good things you didn't expect on today's episode.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's more to get to, Matt, including are

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we overpaying for internet and are there ways to combat that.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that and more right after this.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 2>All right, buddy, we are back from the break. It

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>is now time for the ludicrous headline of the week,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>which this week is from Fast Company. Headline reads, Millennials

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 2>are plagued by fantom wealth. Why the generation doesn't feel

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>rich despite their net worth quadrupling? Did you know that

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>millennials net worth is quadruple Jrol has yours quadrupled? Mat yes,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 2>it has out of tupled. I will say millennials as

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a cohort have outlasted the tremors of the Great Recession, right,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>like that was the big It's like, oh man, you've

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 2>got this generation going into adulthood, leaving college. They got

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>their degrees, Now they can't get jobs.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>All those headlines early on were about how millennials were

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>never going to recover, and they have things.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>We're looking pretty dour. We've seen our network skyrocket especially,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I would say over the past six years, but the

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>millennial crowd has hit their stride. From a work and

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>from an income perspective, networks have increased. But a lot

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of folks around our age they don't actually feel wealthy,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's typically because their money is tied up in

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 2>liquid assets like their home. All right, Like you've seen

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>your home equity increase, but it's tough. It's tough to

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 2>pull that money out of that tangible or like you're

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>four to one k. A lot of listeners, especially millennial listeners,

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 2>have had hopefully if it was an automatic it's something

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that they did themselves. But a lot of employers now

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>are auto enrolling their new employees.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like they got the message. They stuck more than

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>their four one k and they're happy about seeing their

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>net worth balloon. But they also can't touch.

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>That money either. But that's also kind of a part

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of it, right, Like part of building wealth is not

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 2>touching the majority of it. For quiet a while, makes

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>me think of Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's late partner, where

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 2>he said, like the number one rule of compounding is

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to not interrupt it unnecessarily, which is so true. So

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact is you're doing it right. This is how

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>you build wealth. This is how you're going to be

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>able to retire in your later years. But that being said,

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>if you're investing so much that you feel poor where

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>you can't even enjoy a craft beer equivalent, I would say,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're doing it wrong, Like maybe you've cut back

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>in every single area of your life. It's a part

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>of why that's something that we always talk about, Joel

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 2>craft beer or maybe in your case now it's craft meat.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>By the ability to spend in some ways, it seems

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of silly, but it's something that lights you up.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>That's important as well to live life in the here now,

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 2>or especially early on when you might be aggressively saving.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't forego some of those things that matter right while

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to save up and invest for the future,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you do, you are going to have those

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>negative feelings. And I do think that's ultimately harmful, and

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it causes a lot of people to say, why am

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I investing for this thing forty years down the road?

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Why don't I just yobo?

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that's why you have to have balance in

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 1>your approach. And Matt, if you want to boost your

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>savings straight, there's new evidence that you should be more optimistic.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>A new study from the American Psychological Association finds that

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>being optimistic about the future may help people save more money,

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and people who described themselves as more optimistic they ended

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up saving a higher percentage of their income. And that

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>applies across the income spectrum, whether you were bringing home

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>six figures or whether you're bringing home half that and so,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>as the study said, optimism appears to exert a slightly

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stronger influence on savings behavior than financial literacy and risk tolerance.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Which is kind of crazy to think that, like, just

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>being more optimistic matters more than learning more about money.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So maybe people can turn this off and just go

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like tap into their inner optimism.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's gonna be more beneficial. I don't know.

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But your mindset is I think more powerful than most

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>people give it credit for. And I don't think this

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily like manifesting something into existence, which maybe some

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>gurus would encourage you to do. I think it's more

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>believing that good things are coming down the pike that

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gets you excited for the future. And the truth, I mean,

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>optimists tend to live longer as well. There's evidence about that.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a good idea for us all to work

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on seeing the good because we will save more harm money,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be the more.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Thoughtful about our future, and we'll have a longer future.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Man. Let's talk about utilities Internet specifically, because

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>seeing that they recently published an article about overpaying for

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>their Internet, and I think with more folks working from home,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think there's even more of an attraction to maybe

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>pay premium rates for fast inner that. But it turns

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>out too many folks are paying for speeds that they

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 2>don't really actually use, or speeds that they don't actually need,

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and so opting to go from like a more premium

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 2>speed of like three hundred megabits per second down to

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred megabits per second, that might be a brilliant

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>financial move. So much of this depends on what you're

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>using your internet connection for, how often you're using it.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>So like you're let's say you do like you're uploading

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>massive files, Okay, maybe you do need to pay pay

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 2>attention up speed. That's probably critical for you to be

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 2>able to do your job efficiently. If you've got multiple

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 2>folks or family members whatever, streaming on different devices at

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the same time, maybe you want to pay more as well.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I think similar to buying the unlimited

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>data cell phone plan, when you're on Wi Fi most

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of the time at home, I think you might be

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>paying too much. This might be an instance where it's

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 2>just money going to waste. Man. And this also makes

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 2>me think about let's say you're at home, you're watching

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a movie and it like glitches or it kind of

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 2>times out or whatever. It's like, dang it, it's got

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a load kind of ruins. The ruins the flow a

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 2>little bit, and so folks think they're like, oh, you

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>know what we need to do. We need to pay

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>more for our internet. We should upgrade it to one

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>of those premium speed plans, when in reality, what I

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of folks need to do, and I'm

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 2>saying this from personal experience, what they need to do

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 2>is get take their Wi Fi router out of the

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>cabinet and pull it because like it's that's a wood

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>positioning matters. Yeah, that's a wooden coffin, and it's really

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>hard for the Wi Fi signal to get from the

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>wireless router to your device, to your phone to your TV.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>In a coffin in the backyard. And now I'm like,

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>where are my speed?

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I don't have internet anymore. What I would do it,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>but I'm still paying for it, so truly, and I

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 2>get why people don't want to do that because typically

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>they're not pretty, you know, like they're typically unsightly, like

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>there's it can be a jumble of cords and so

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking, let me just put that in the cabin

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>let me stick that in the bottom of the closet.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But that impacts your speeds. You want to have a

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>clear line of sight. That is really important. I think folks, uh,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>they're doing it wrong. Yeah right, Like they think just

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>by paying more that that's going to increase their speeds

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 2>when in reality it's just okay, your methodology, your technique,

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure you're paying that some attention as well.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're talking, at least with the cost of

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>internet about paying more every single month, Well, what about

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe getting a mesh router system. Those things have gone

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>down in price, and yeah, maybe you're extending the internet

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>signal to make it faster in other parts of the house.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you don't need faster speeds, you just need

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it better coverage. Yeah, better coverage, and that's a one

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>time cost is instead of upgrading and paying more money

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>every single month and not getting essentially what you need either.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We're totally like do with the ced net beat right now.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>But like and so when some folks might hear j

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>you'll say, like the mesh router system and just like,

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>oh man, that sounds that sounds confusing. That's like plug

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and play though, But it also doesn't even have to

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 2>be that complicated. You can literally and this is what

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>we've done, but you can buy another wireless router that's

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly like the current one. You have, plug the Internet

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 2>cable into the back of that thing, and plug that

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>into the other router that's somewhere that's positioned somewhere else

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>in your house. So if you do have a long,

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 2>skinny house, rather than having a router right in the middle,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe that means kind of placing them at both ends

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 2>of your house. And you can just I mean, I

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't bat an eyelash it doing this, but

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I just drilled the hole into my floor, through the hardwoods,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>down into the cross space. You run that cable to

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the other part of the house, have it pop up,

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>plug it in, name it the exact same name, with

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the same password and everything, and your devices will hop

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 2>from one to the other seamlessly.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, look at that little little tech tip.

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Didn't know you were getting that in depth tech analysis here.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>The other thing, Matt, people spend too much more, and

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>this is something we talked about regularly on the show,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is streaming services, right, And Americans are spending an average

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of one thousand dollars a year for streaming now, bringing

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the monthly cost at least kind of closer to what

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>cable used to cost us. And we're still watching ads

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like we had to in the cable days. Two at

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>least most people are because they're not paying the premium

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for which is now a lot more to get ads

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>removed from your streaming And.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Like we saw last Sunday, the ads, they're just not

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>as good as they used to be. No commercials, just

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 2>not They're not as good, not at all.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Although I only watched the first half, I didn't watch

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the game. So but you actually

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't watch watch any of it? But did you

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>go watch any of the ads?

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, oh I searched it. See. I was like,

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm an advertising guy, man, that's that's my background way

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>back in the day. And I still love seeing what,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, what clever things they came up with. Yeah,

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 2>there's not much cleverness out there. It's a little do,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a little dill this year. Yeah.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's just a good reminder to go

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 1>take a look see what services are currently subscribed to

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>make the goal of having I think fewer simultaneous services.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, watch Severance or Silo or whatever your favorite

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV show is for a month, which I haven't.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I still you haven't watched seven season two?

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Noo? Yeah, season two. I can't wait. But I just

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 2>haven't been able to carve the time out. Yes, which

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 2>means I haven't resubscribed to Apple Plus yet because I

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 2>haven't committed to being in it. Baby, yeah, ok, I

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>want to.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Once you do, though, watch it in a month and

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then get rid of it, like you don't want to

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>stay subscribed to it exactly. And then you know, careful

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers I think, who pay attention, who cancel services regularly,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones who are winning in the new environment.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's far too many people who just aren't taking

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that tact. And I think it's also Matt. They're a

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>good reminder there are pretty good free services out there now,

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like to B, freeb and Filo. It's amazing to see

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>how much steam some of those are gaining, how much

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>people are gravitating over there. Hey, if you're gonna watch

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ads anyway, why not not pay a dime?

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Why not? Yeah? Okay. So we talked about the need

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 2>for higher taxes as well as reduced government spending on

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday with economist Noah Smith, and man, there's no way

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 2>around the both and approach. And get this, it turns

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>out that most Americans are willing to be taxed more

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 2>in order to keep their favorite government benefits like Social Security.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that crazy? Eighty five percent of folks surveyed would

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 2>like to see social Security benefits enhanced. I feel like

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a CSI joke in the enhanced, but they wouldn't

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>mind a bigger tax bill for that perk. There is

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>only something like fifteen percent of folks who said that

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>they'd be willing to take a reduced benefit in order

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to prevent tax increases. And found that really fascinating. There's

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>not much political will to even touch taxes or Social

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Security payouts, and in fact, the current administration they're talking

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 2>about stopping taxing social Security benefits overall. Yeah, but given

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the state of Social Security, man like, we've got to

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 2>make some real changes if we want it to stick

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>around for future generations. It seems like some degree, it

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>seems like some degree of austerity is going to be necessary.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>But then I was after talking with Noah, I was

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it, and I wonder if that's not true anymore,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>not in the sense of like the modern monetary theory

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that. But so states obviously have to

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>reconcile their budgets, but the federal government doesn't, and so

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>so much of it comes down to what the alternatives are.

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>And as long as the US system and our economy

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 2>as a whole continues to thrive, why would you change

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>something even if we are running a deficit, because so

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 2>much of it is in relation to what other countries

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>are doing. And guess what other countries run deficits as

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>well Asian countries, European countries, They're all running deficits, and

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of relative, which is crazy to say,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 2>because you know, what would your mom say if, like,

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>if everybody else is running jumping off the bridge aal

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>would you well in this case, like there is a

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>limited number of people who are jumping off the bridge,

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And truly, if everyone is jumping off the bridge and

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>things are and money continues to be invested in, say

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>in the in the US, there is there's no viable

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>alternative when I'm thinking about investing specifically here when it

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to investing in markets that are also like blowing

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>up and doing really well. So I don't know, just

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>an idea. It's almost like no one's willing to say, oh,

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>we don't need to eliminate the deficit. But that's how

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>they're acting, Like that's how administrations over the past several

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean years and decades have acted that this is

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 2>something that doesn't in fact need to be addressed, And

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe it doesn't because other countries are are doing something

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 2>highly similar.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but what Noah was saying is essentially, the higher

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the deficit and the debt grow, and the more of

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the government budget that has to go to pay interest

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like it will inhibit dynamism at some point. So I

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do think this is.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>One of the best relation to what other countries and

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 2>other countries are also are also doing that.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't we want to be way more by dynamic than

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>actually I would think so.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>But as long as we are, as long as we

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>have less of our overall budget going towards interest payments

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>than other countries, then maybe we can kind of have

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>our cake and be able to eat it too. Maybe

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Okay, But speaking of like paying more taxes on purpose,

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what a lot of those people in that

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Social Security survey we're signing up for, the Wall Street

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Journal had an article on that topic too this week,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and it makes you think, why would we want to

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>pay more taxes on purpose? Well, there are some reasons

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you might want to purposely pay more in tax

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and what she highlighted in this article is that more

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Americans could benefit from what she calls strategically accelerating your income. Basically,

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're can afford to pay more taxes today, well

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it might lead to overall tax reduction. And this is

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>something we've talked about on the show before two. You know,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about essentially being able and willing to pay

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>more taxes in twenty twenty five on purpose in order

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to reduce your future tax burden. And I think it's

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a smart suggestion. It's more of a holistic tax planning

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>approach totally than just trying to, hey, how low can

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I cram my current year tax bill? Just it's a

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>very myopic approach saying like, how can I limit taxes

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in this world one given year instead of thinking about

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>well how much tax am I going to pay over

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the course of my life.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Which is like it makes sense though, because I think

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of folks who might be thinking, uh, well,

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>especially maybe folks who are going to a tax professional

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 2>and they're paying money, and so the tax professional kind

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of steers them in that direction too, because they're trying

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to justify what it is that they're charging. And if

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>they're the one saying well, actually you should probably pay

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I know you just paid me, but you also need

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to pay more in taxes. Yeah, Like it feels like

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 2>a double way of me.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>As Also, the tax pro win is to say I

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>got you the biggest refund yes, and you're like you brock,

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep coming back to you, yes, because

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that feels the best in the short term exactly, but

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it could lead to the most you know, long term

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>financial pain.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So more retirees are starting to find themselves in

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than his anticipated tax brackets thanks to rm ds

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>required minimum distributions. So let's learn maybe from some of

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the issues they're facing. Guess why we typically talk about

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>having more wroth accounts and balancing out your tax exposure

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>classic example, as you're contributing two those retirement accounts, because

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to end up in that position where

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like, man, I mean, it's not the worst thing

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world to have a massive traditional form one K,

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but when you think about it from a tax perspective,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there are things you could have done along the way

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate future taxation by bringing a little more of

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the pain into the present.

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just facing the reality. It makes me think

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 2>about like, if you're hiring somebody to paint your house,

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it's just like they're thinking, Okay, I gotta get a

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>competitive price so that they hire me. And then once

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 2>we're doing it, I just need to make this house

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 2>look good, like it just needs to be painted, it

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 2>needs to be shiny or whatever. It needs to be fresh.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And if they come across some rot, you know, if

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 2>they're only thinking about the here and now, it's like, oh,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>is ever just gonna slap some pain on that thing? Yeah,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to being the bearer of bad news. And

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I think oftentimes that's what it feels like when you

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 2>say to somebody that, hey, yeah, it's probably gonna behoove

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you to pay a little more in tax right now.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Like you feel like the bear of bad news.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But the painter is like, hey, we're going to replace

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a few boards because ultimately it's gonna save you money

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the long run.

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But if you can have a conversation about that

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to point to the bigger, overall picture, well, of course

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that's what we want to do. You don't just want

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to slap some pain on it and not have to

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>think about it now because it's going to turn into

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>a bigger headache down the road. So's right, that's what

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to get y'all to do with those roth IRA's.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think for and if you are hiring someone

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to do your taxes, those are good questions to ask, like, Hey,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not concerned with only lowering my taxes

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>right now this given year. How can I think about

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>smart tax planning moving forward? And that's like thinking about

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>conversations we've had on the show with Sean Mulaney. Those

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are really important conversations to have because again, the stakes

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>are high when we're talking about taxation, and you might

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to save a couple grand this year, but

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>what if you could save a heck of a lot

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>more than that over the course of the next ten

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years because you paid a little bit more now.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Heck yeah, actually, I just looked it up. That's episode

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 2>seven fifty eight that we last talked about that with

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Sean mulaney, So look that one up. Yeah. But otherwise, man,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be it for this Friday. Flight Listeners

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 2>can finder show notes up on the website at how

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to money dot com. We hope everyone has fantastic weekend.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Hope your Valentine's Day plans turned out well. Forever up there,

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 2>and you'll love her.

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Some beef turkey. That's that's my suggestion.

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 2>If only Emily knew that that was the way to

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 2>your heart, she would have beat you to the punch.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, that's gonna do it, Matt. Until next time,

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>best friends out, Best Friends Out.