Speaker 1: I thanks Scott you on an hour two Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: Show toll free it is eight hundred and nine to
Speaker 1: four one Sean if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. The President giving an hour and fifteen
Speaker 1: minute impromptu press conference today, something that we have not
Speaker 1: experienced a lot of the last well throughout the entire
Speaker 1: campaign and throughout the last four years. And he commented
Speaker 1: on the drones, and you know, he talked about how
Speaker 1: it's near Bedminster and the military knows he's where I
Speaker 1: am on this. There's no way they don't know. At
Speaker 1: this point, I don't believe it. Their lack of urgency
Speaker 1: is breathtaking to me. Again described as the size of
Speaker 1: a dining room table or the size of a ne
Speaker 1: suv or a school bus even you know, with loud
Speaker 1: noises behind them. And we're supposed to believe that our
Speaker 1: military doesn't know where they originated from, doesn't know who's
Speaker 1: operating them, doesn't know what they're capable of, and there's
Speaker 1: been no urgency and we're nearly a full month into
Speaker 1: the first spotting not buying it. I think we're being
Speaker 1: lied to at a very high level. Why I can't
Speaker 1: venture a guess. But these are the same people that
Speaker 1: lied about the Chinese by balloon. They are the same
Speaker 1: people that lied about Joe's cognitive state and hid that.
Speaker 1: They are the same people that lied about the economy
Speaker 1: and inflation to be in transitory.
Speaker 2: You know, they lied about the borders.
Speaker 1: The same people that reiterated the lie and forced social
Speaker 1: big tech media people to lie. And you know, if
Speaker 1: you get the vaccine, you're not going to get COVID,
Speaker 1: and if you get the vaccine, you're not going to
Speaker 1: infect other people. That turned out to be a huge lie,
Speaker 1: and they systemically went forward with those lies. Anyway, here's
Speaker 1: President Trump trying to get to the truth earlier today.
Speaker 3: The government knows what is happening. Look, military knows where
Speaker 3: they took off from. If it's a garage, they can
Speaker 3: go right into that garage. They know where it came
Speaker 3: from and where it went. And for some reason they
Speaker 3: don't want to come in. And I think they'd be
Speaker 3: better off saying what it is. Our military knows, and
Speaker 3: our president knows, and for some reason they want to
Speaker 3: keep people in suspense. I can't imagine it's the enemy,
Speaker 3: because it was the enemy they'd blasted out even if
Speaker 3: they were late, they'd blasted. Something strange is going on.
Speaker 3: For some reason, they don't want to tell the people,
Speaker 3: and they should because the people are really I mean,
Speaker 3: they happened to be.
Speaker 2: Over Bedminster one a know t.
Speaker 3: They're they're very close to Bedminster. I think maybe I
Speaker 3: won't spend the weekend in bedminste. I've decided to cancel my.
Speaker 1: Trip, so the President said, and he was very clear.
Speaker 1: He started his conversation on this Friday night and call
Speaker 1: for authorities to shoot down the mysterious drones. Let the
Speaker 1: public and now otherwise shoot them down, and he put
Speaker 1: that on true social Over the weekend, the US Air
Speaker 1: Force base was forced to close over the because of
Speaker 1: the unauthorized drone activity. By the way, it said, eight
Speaker 1: thousand acre base is one of the largest air force
Speaker 1: that the Air Force maintains worldwide, and over the weekend
Speaker 1: they were forced to shut it down, which it would
Speaker 1: indicate they don't know anything. I'd much rather be lied to,
Speaker 1: which I don't like at all by our government. They
Speaker 1: lied to us all the time than them not knowing
Speaker 1: anything about these drones. The New Jersey utility officials are
Speaker 1: urging the Biden FAA to take action as it relates
Speaker 1: to this, and Congressman Jeff Van Drew confirmed that the
Speaker 1: request of the FAA was made on Friday of this
Speaker 1: past week. We know now New York Governor Hochel and
Speaker 1: Chucky Schumer in New Yorker demanding that Biden knew something
Speaker 1: about the drones.
Speaker 2: Uh. And and you know.
Speaker 1: For Democrats to be this divided over it is interesting
Speaker 1: the NYPD, their Terrorism Task Force could deploy, could deploy
Speaker 1: their own combat ready drone fleet against the mystery invaders.
Speaker 2: You know. So there's a lot happening here. You know.
Speaker 1: One New Jersey senator says the FEDS are too fearful
Speaker 1: of public reaction to tell the truth about all of this.
Speaker 1: And this is Senator John Bramnik, uh, you know, saying
Speaker 1: the Defense Department needs to come clean. Marjorie Taylor Green
Speaker 1: said the government is in control of them. Senator Andy
Speaker 1: Kim you know, says most possible drone sightings he witnessed
Speaker 1: were almost certainly planes, which is the opposite of what
Speaker 1: he said last week. So I don't know where he's
Speaker 1: coming from.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 2: That's that's rather bizarre.
Speaker 1: And I can keep going on and on anyway here
Speaker 1: to analyze this and much more. Is Gordon Chang, author
Speaker 1: of the Coming Collapse China, the Great US China Tech War,
Speaker 1: which China on many fronts, hypersonic technology included, seems to
Speaker 1: be winning. And he pointed out that and x'd out
Speaker 1: a story that breaking intel from a verified high level
Speaker 1: source with top secret special access clearance just dropped bombshell
Speaker 1: information In terms of the mysterious drones over the US,
Speaker 1: these are our drones tracking gamma rays linked to possible
Speaker 1: weapons of mass destruction. Now that's a scary scenario. Gordon Shang,
Speaker 1: do you believe that.
Speaker 4: I believe that that certainly is plausible. You know, President
Speaker 4: Trump was certainly right. The federal government knows what's going on,
Speaker 4: and as you pointed out, Sean, there is a demonstrable
Speaker 4: lack of urgency, which means that this is a federal
Speaker 4: project because these thrones are not from hobbyists. Hobbyists don't
Speaker 4: have thrones the size of its or school buses, and
Speaker 4: they don't have drones that operate in the videos that
Speaker 4: we have seen. So the question is what is the
Speaker 4: federal government doing. I do know that US federal officials
Speaker 4: have for more than a decade been concerned that the
Speaker 4: North Koreans could take a nuclear device, break it apart,
Speaker 4: smuggle the pieces into the United States, and reassemble it
Speaker 4: in the city of their choice. So that would resemble
Speaker 4: that fear, which has been something that has unnerved US officials.
Speaker 1: Well, it should unnerve everybody here and if they're worried
Speaker 1: about potential radiation, like, for example, I know in New
Speaker 1: York City, it's not a secret that there are radiation
Speaker 1: detectors all over New York. So if there's any radioactive materials,
Speaker 1: people would know about it. And I've got to imagine
Speaker 1: most big cities have that technology, don't they.
Speaker 4: I think that they do. But the NYPD actually devotes
Speaker 4: a lot of resource is to looking for radiation and
Speaker 4: they have cars currently on patrol Core, constantly on patrol,
Speaker 4: which sniff for radiation. So this is something that the
Speaker 4: new NYPD has been thoroughly planning for and has been
Speaker 4: operating for quite some years in trying to detect.
Speaker 2: But that's just New York And what about the rest
Speaker 2: of the country.
Speaker 4: The rest of the country, I'm sure big cities do
Speaker 4: the same thing because it is a threat, and I'm
Speaker 4: sure that's also true in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2: This is something that I mean, don't you have to
Speaker 2: worry about a dirty bomb? Let's be honest.
Speaker 4: A dirty bomb, yes, and that's easy, relatively easy to
Speaker 4: put together, and much harder to prevent. But once you
Speaker 4: have a nuclear device, it's hard to shield the radiation.
Speaker 4: But with those gamma race bikes in the New York
Speaker 4: metropolitan area and with this drone activity at the same time,
Speaker 4: the American people need to ask what's going on. And
Speaker 4: I believe that President Biden, as commander in chief, the
Speaker 4: one who has the constitutional duty to protect us, needs
Speaker 4: to talk to the American people, tell us what he
Speaker 4: knows and what he doesn't know. We're adults, We're not
Speaker 4: going to panic. We need to know what's going on,
Speaker 4: because if we don't know, we are going to speculate,
Speaker 4: and we are going to think about the ominous scenarios
Speaker 4: because those at this moment seem to be the most probable.
Speaker 1: So let me ask you about We were watching and
Speaker 1: witnessing a Trump phenomenon, and that is the world of
Speaker 1: reaction to his election, and he saw little justin in Canada,
Speaker 1: you know, go down and kiss the ring gown at
Speaker 1: mar A Lago. We see you know, Mexico is now
Speaker 1: beginning to secure their border or pledging to do so.
Speaker 1: And the Biden administration and the quote resistance is trying
Speaker 1: to Trump proof pretty much every department and hire as
Speaker 1: many people as they can, spend as much money as possible,
Speaker 1: give out as much money for environmental justice and student
Speaker 1: loan forgiveness, etc. The selling, you know, the remaining parts
Speaker 1: of the wall that we had already paid for for
Speaker 1: pennies on the dollar, knowing that Trump is going to
Speaker 1: have to buy it again. So they think they're screwing Trump,
Speaker 1: but they're really hurting the American people. You know, they're
Speaker 1: trying to get as many hires in and the deep state,
Speaker 1: the DOJ. They're escalating war in Europe with Ukraine and
Speaker 1: Russia and in the Middle East as well by firing
Speaker 1: missiles into Syria. And I'm watching all of this unfolds
Speaker 1: here and then you can add to that the commutations
Speaker 1: and the pardons and etc. But you know, look at
Speaker 1: the people that they're pardoning. A Pennsylvania judge that took bribes,
Speaker 1: you know, to send kids to to for profit detention centers.
Speaker 1: An Illinois clerk that embezzled fifty three million from a
Speaker 1: town of just fifteen thousand people. A Massachusetts woman convicted
Speaker 1: of fentanyl trafficking conspiracy. You know, we talked about, you know,
Speaker 1: three Chinese nationals that will pardoned, one guilty of child abuse.
Speaker 1: And as we watch these countries, the world react. Germany
Speaker 1: reactah Canada react, Mexico react, the Middle East react. You know,
Speaker 1: is z Thelenski and Putin reacting. The one country that's
Speaker 1: been the most quiet is the one you have the
Speaker 1: greatest expertise. And then that would be China and the
Speaker 1: President talking about tariffs on China earlier today. What's going
Speaker 1: on in China right now? What's the president chief thinking
Speaker 1: and doing?
Speaker 4: Well? If we go back to the first of November,
Speaker 4: kind of went suddenly quiet. They flipped the switch, no
Speaker 4: more provocations in their peripheral season waters and they were
Speaker 4: quiet for about three and a half weeks, and then
Speaker 4: at the end of November they flipped the switch again
Speaker 4: and they started a rampage of provocations, especially against the
Speaker 4: Philippines in Taiwan. I think that Si Jimping is trying
Speaker 4: to take advantage of an opportunity, which is essentially Trump,
Speaker 4: not commander in chief, but Biden in the White House,
Speaker 4: and so I think that this was sort of his
Speaker 4: last hurrah to see what he could do. This means
Speaker 4: that the Chinese believe there's a window of opportunity while
Speaker 4: Biden is still president, and that, of course, is very dangerous.
Speaker 4: The other thing, Shawn in a different area, on tariffs.
Speaker 4: From November fourth, China has depreciated the rem and bee
Speaker 4: the currency, and I think that they did that to
Speaker 4: try to protect themselves against the imposition of Trump's tariffs,
Speaker 4: which means that Chinese products will get cheaper, which means
Speaker 4: that the American public is already benefiting from Trump's talk
Speaker 4: of imposing tariffs on China and others.
Speaker 1: Now, however, if do you think that China would then
Speaker 1: open the door and stop the unfair tariffs that they've
Speaker 1: been putting on American companies for goods going into their country,
Speaker 1: do you believe they'll stop intellectual property theft? We know
Speaker 1: during the campaign that both China and Iran were both
Speaker 1: able to hack into the Trump campaign and to top
Speaker 1: campaign officials into their emails and phones, and nobody seems
Speaker 1: to hold them responsible for.
Speaker 2: Any of this.
Speaker 4: Yes, and that was because of the Biden policy of
Speaker 4: non imposing costs on China except where absolutely they were
Speaker 4: forced to, and they did that in the campaign because
Speaker 4: they thought it was obviously good for the election prospects
Speaker 4: for Kamala Harris. I think that when Trump takes the
Speaker 4: oath of office, we were going to see China slink
Speaker 4: back again because they realized that President Trump's thread of
Speaker 4: teriffs can do great damage to the Chinese economy. Ajim
Speaker 4: Ping has placed his only hope in rescuing a grim
Speaker 4: situation at home in selling more abroad, and Trump's tariffs
Speaker 4: are a direct threat to that, and that means not
Speaker 4: only will Trump impose tariffs, but I think that the
Speaker 4: inspirational impact around the world means that other countries will
Speaker 4: also defend their economies against China. This will be a
Speaker 4: consequential time, Sean and I believe Trump knows what to do,
Speaker 4: and he obviously has the political will to do it.
Speaker 4: So this is going to be a time where we
Speaker 4: are going to start protecting our country against the regime
Speaker 4: which has been maliciously assaulting us for four years.
Speaker 1: Well, they've been allowed to get away with it. I
Speaker 1: think that's the biggest problem. All right, quick break more
Speaker 1: with Gordon Chang on the other side, than we'll hit
Speaker 1: the phones eight hundred and nine four one sean as
Speaker 1: we continue on this Monday, all right, we continue now
Speaker 1: with Gordon Chang. There is this gap of vulnerability and
Speaker 1: you know, my sources tell me it goes way beyond
Speaker 1: hypersonic technology that Russia and China has. But we do
Speaker 1: have have, you know, a militarily technologically a disadvantage. And
Speaker 1: do you do you believe that the Communist Chinese understand
Speaker 1: that that disadvantage or do they have a deep respect
Speaker 1: you know for American ballistic you know, missile technology and
Speaker 1: our ability to deliver nuclear weapons, which is far superior
Speaker 1: to them.
Speaker 4: Both, they do understand that in a critical area, which
Speaker 4: is hypersonics that you mentioned, they have about a half
Speaker 4: decade lead on us. And this is important because we
Speaker 4: don't have defenses against their hypersonic missiles. Those missiles can
Speaker 4: sink our aircraft carriers and other ships, and they can
Speaker 4: get in undetected because they move so.
Speaker 1: Fast, well they move in my understanding too, is they
Speaker 1: have the ability to maneuver them.
Speaker 4: Yes, they do. China's hypersonic missiles are maneuverable, which makes
Speaker 4: them extremely difficult if not impossible to shoot down. But
Speaker 4: on the other hand, your other point was that, yes,
Speaker 4: the Chinese are concerned because they know that our missiles,
Speaker 4: although maybe not as technologically superior to theirs, nonetheless can
Speaker 4: do great damage to China.
Speaker 1: So there is we have too many delivery systems. They'd
Speaker 1: never be able to defend against it, at least not now.
Speaker 1: But I have to run Gordon Chang. We appreciate you,
Speaker 1: Thank you, my friend. What did you want to say?
Speaker 1: You said something?
Speaker 5: You know it's been obviously, there's no shortage of news.
Speaker 5: And the president spoke today for ninety minutes, which I
Speaker 5: think is longer than Biden spoke all year. So congratulations
Speaker 5: to our newly elected forty seventh president. But he took
Speaker 5: some time to shout you out yet again. You had
Speaker 5: another shout out, luk at you.
Speaker 2: We have one of that.
Speaker 3: Very interestingly on Bulletzer, because reporters at the New York
Speaker 3: Times Washington Post got Bulletser prizes for their wonderful, accurate
Speaker 3: and highly professional reporting one the Russia Russia Russia hoax.
Speaker 3: Well it turned out to be a hoax, and they
Speaker 3: were exactly wrong. People, like many people, John Solomon, Sean
Speaker 3: Hannity's not for Pulitzer. But Sean Hannity got it right.
Speaker 3: Many people got it right. Tucker got it right, Jesse
Speaker 3: got it right, Laura got it right, Janine got it right.
Speaker 3: A lot of people got it right. They didn't get anything.
Speaker 3: They gave it to reporters. They got it absolutely wrong.
Speaker 3: And now everybody admits it was a hoax. And I
Speaker 3: want them to get back, take back the policy prizes,
Speaker 3: and pay big damages.
Speaker 1: I want my Pulitzer price. Should I hold my breath?
Speaker 1: I think a big knife for you.
Speaker 5: You know, you go, you get a fancy prize, you
Speaker 5: wear a fancy penguin suit.
Speaker 1: It's really sad, Like Maggie Haberman over at the New
Speaker 1: York Times ought to give me hers. That's what I
Speaker 1: think is. They got it so wrong, you know, and
Speaker 1: the conspiracy.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Let me backtrack here, and we went through this last week,
Speaker 1: and I'm not patting myself on the back. It is
Speaker 1: it is something that does define this show. And I
Speaker 1: think it defines maybe maybe some of the longevity I've
Speaker 1: had in both radio and TV. And and I learned
Speaker 1: that lesson with Richard Richard Jewel, and because I had
Speaker 1: no idea. It was listening to my program when the
Speaker 1: story broke that he was a suspect in the Olympic bombing,
Speaker 1: because he fit the profile of a lone bomber. Because
Speaker 1: this guy, this the young man at the time, lived
Speaker 1: with his mother. I'm like, so what he lives with
Speaker 1: his mother? That does not make one a terrorist. It
Speaker 1: came flying out of my mouth. I didn't rush to judgment. Instinctively,
Speaker 1: he was listening. I ended up getting what the first
Speaker 1: interview with the guy and years later and I was right.
Speaker 1: And then the media went crazy. They went insane, and
Speaker 1: that was the narrative, and the guy that turned out
Speaker 1: to be the hero was on defense and smeared and slandered.
Speaker 1: He ended up making, you know, getting paid by these
Speaker 1: news outlets. His attorney had said to me lynn Wood
Speaker 1: at the time or after, said he thinks that that's
Speaker 1: what led to his early death. I mean, he died
Speaker 1: in his forties and that just destroyed him. And that
Speaker 1: type of publicity will upend anybody's life. And it turned
Speaker 1: out he was a hero. But I learned a valuable
Speaker 1: lesson from it, and as a result, we don't rush
Speaker 1: to judgment. And as a result, when high profile cases
Speaker 1: come along, you know, for example Ferguson, Missouri. I knew
Speaker 1: from my sources in law enforcement that early on there
Speaker 1: were multiple witnesses, African American witnesses that confirmed Officer Darren
Speaker 1: Wilson's story hands up, don't shoot, never happened, and it
Speaker 1: had become a big rallying cry regurgitated by the legacy
Speaker 1: state run media. The same thing happened in Baltimore. I
Speaker 1: had law enforcement sources. I'm a talk show host. We
Speaker 1: do regular news reporting too, that's part of my job description.
Speaker 1: And they were telling me, in no uncertain terms, this
Speaker 1: is never, never going to be a conviction, and here's why.
Speaker 1: And they were right on the Duke Lacross case, you know,
Speaker 1: we just had Crystal Magnum admit that she lied eighteen
Speaker 1: years ago. Well, I took the time and I drove
Speaker 1: out and I met with the families, some of the
Speaker 1: families of the kids that were being accused and in
Speaker 1: the Duke Lacross case. And I learned when I met
Speaker 1: with them that there would be exculpatory evidence that would
Speaker 1: exonerate them. And yet everybody, including professors at the university,
Speaker 1: they just rushed the judgment the legacy state run media
Speaker 1: mob and they all get it wrong. I call them
Speaker 1: a mob because they have a mob mentality. The same
Speaker 1: with the UVA case, the same with the George Zimmerman case.
Speaker 1: I was told early on that there was going to
Speaker 1: be an eyewitness that would testify that it was George
Speaker 1: Zimmerman that was screaming because his head was there was
Speaker 1: a ground and pound of his head into cement, and
Speaker 1: the witness would test the fight of this, which in
Speaker 1: fact happened, and that resulted in that verdict. And so
Speaker 1: you know, there have been many instances. Then you add, okay,
Speaker 1: we vetted Barack Obama. They never vetted Barack Obama. We
Speaker 1: vetted Kamala Harris. We had the Kamala files, many of you,
Speaker 1: thankfully were fully deputized, and we put it up for
Speaker 1: free on almost hannitysocial media, Hannity dot Com, the Walls files,
Speaker 1: and and let you hear their extremism, their radicalism in
Speaker 1: their own words.
Speaker 2: Nobody else in the media did that.
Speaker 1: And then you take it a step further, then you
Speaker 1: go back to the Trump years. I mean, what they
Speaker 1: what they did to this man is unprecedented. How they
Speaker 1: went after this man is unprecedented, you know, rating mar Lago,
Speaker 1: but they didn't rate Hillary Clinton's house. So with the
Speaker 1: same issue top secret classified information, Joe Biden at top
Speaker 1: secret classified information and forced separate locations, they didn't. That's
Speaker 1: not equal justice or application of our laws. And you know,
Speaker 1: nobody cared that about. You want to talk about insurrection,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, the rioters in the summer of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: tweeting out a bail fund four days after Minneapolis police
Speaker 1: precinc a burner of the ground. Nobody ever brought that
Speaker 1: up in the campaign. They didn't tell the American people
Speaker 1: the truth because they had an agenda, and then went
Speaker 1: on Colbert and said, they're not going to stop rioting,
Speaker 1: and they shouldn't stop rioting, and we're not going to
Speaker 1: stop supporting them. And you would think that would be
Speaker 1: a big deal from the people that lied so much
Speaker 1: about so many aspects of January sixth, but rating they
Speaker 1: prebunked the New York Post exclusive on the laptop from Hell.
Speaker 1: I mean, the FBI was meeting and the media went
Speaker 1: along with this, and they were meeting with all these
Speaker 1: big tech companies in the months leading up to the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election. If there's a story about Hunter and
Speaker 1: Joe and it's probably fake news and Russian disinformation it was,
Speaker 1: and Russian distance information, you know, or policing Pete Navarro.
Speaker 1: Remember they put him in leg irons when he was
Speaker 1: arrested for you know, a non violent misdemeanor because he
Speaker 1: refused to go and plead the fifth before the January
Speaker 1: sixth committee out of a constitutional principle that he believed in.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, give him credit for doing it.
Speaker 1: He could have gotten out of that easy. You know,
Speaker 1: look at uh and Miranda Devine had have a really
Speaker 1: good list today on all of this, or FBI agents,
Speaker 1: you know, going after those that attend Latin mass out
Speaker 1: you know, Catholics that attend Latin mass or retaliating against whistleblowers,
Speaker 1: which we know they did, or downplaying the first assassination
Speaker 1: attempt and outright lying about it. And Donald Trump came
Speaker 1: within a millimeter of being assassinated and he might have
Speaker 1: just been hit with shrapnel. Now it was a slope roof.
Speaker 1: That's that's why there weren't Secret Service agents on that roof.
Speaker 1: There was no pitch to the roof. I used to
Speaker 1: do roofing. You know, the DEI were, you know, woke
Speaker 1: ification of the FBI. All of this has occurred, and
Speaker 1: and all these stories Russia, Russia, the Steele dossier, Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton's bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier. You know,
Speaker 1: we got all of these stories right. They got it
Speaker 1: wrong then, And why am I saying all this? What
Speaker 1: they don't understand is that for nine years they have
Speaker 1: they have betrayed the trust of the American people. Now,
Speaker 1: there might be some and there's a lot of stories
Speaker 1: about how the legacy state run media mob and how
Speaker 1: they're failing, and how their ratings are at all time lows,
Speaker 1: and and there'll probably be some ratings recovery and they'll start,
Speaker 1: They'll they'll get their radical some of their radical base
Speaker 1: back to believe more of their lives and conspiracy theories.
Speaker 1: But what they what they are missing in this is
Speaker 1: the trust factor is that even their own supporters know,
Speaker 1: deep down in their heart they can't trust them to
Speaker 1: tell the truth. And you know, being part of the
Speaker 1: foundational beginnings of new media, both in talk radio and
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel, I mean, in a sense
Speaker 1: I've been a part of history. I'm very, very grateful
Speaker 1: for that, and now that that new media revolution continues
Speaker 1: with podcasting and social media, et cetera, it just gets
Speaker 1: bigger and bigger that they become more irrelevant. Now, who
Speaker 1: are the people that are going to be successful. The
Speaker 1: criteria to me is going to be authenticity, truth telling
Speaker 1: news and information you're not going to get from them,
Speaker 1: and those people that tell truth will be rewarded. I
Speaker 1: never told you to get the shot. I said, talk
Speaker 1: to you, doctor factor, and I don't know anything about
Speaker 1: your pre existing conditions, goal morbidities, your current medical condition,
Speaker 1: and it's not for me to decide, but take it careful,
Speaker 1: be careful in making your decision, and it's got to
Speaker 1: be yours, and do your own research on top of
Speaker 1: whatever else you hear. Because that the lie that if
Speaker 1: you get the shot you're not going to get COVID
Speaker 1: was debunked pretty quickly, and the lie that if you
Speaker 1: get the shot you're not going to infect others, that was,
Speaker 1: you know, debunked also. So I would just say, you know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of lying that's been going on. The
Speaker 1: media never called out the lies about Joe's cognitive state.
Speaker 2: We did.
Speaker 1: The media never called out the lies about inflation being transitory.
Speaker 1: They never paid a price for lying about the Chinese
Speaker 1: spy balloon. They never were called out for the lies
Speaker 1: on the borders being closed and the borders being secure,
Speaker 1: And now I think they're just flat out lying about
Speaker 1: these drones. Time will tell, but there's no reason if
Speaker 1: there's no sense of urgency that is telling me they
Speaker 1: know what this is and they're just lying to everybody
Speaker 1: about it. Otherwise there's no excuse for not shooting them down.
Speaker 1: You have no idea where they originated from. Really, our military,
Speaker 1: Uh not buying that argument. You have no idea who's
Speaker 1: operating them. I'm not buying that lie. You have no
Speaker 1: idea what their capabilities are. I'm not buying that either.
Speaker 1: And if you don't know, that would scare the hell
Speaker 1: out of me even more than the lying that I'm
Speaker 1: kind of grown used to. So I think that people
Speaker 1: that in the end will survive are going to be
Speaker 1: people that tell the truth. I think there will there
Speaker 1: be an audience for people that just lie in and
Speaker 1: spread conspiracy theories and pedal them, And yeah, they'll be
Speaker 1: there'll be an audience, but it's dwindling. Will it be impactful?
Speaker 1: I think we learned in this election. If if they
Speaker 1: weren't able to stop Donald Trump after nine years of
Speaker 1: NonStop pedaling of lies and conspiracy theories, I don't think
Speaker 1: they'll be able to do it.
Speaker 2: Do you think that's a good analysis? Lend of pretty
Speaker 2: kind coprehensive.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and I think that to your point, there's a
Speaker 5: lot of growth in a lot of other places, and
Speaker 5: they're seeing sort of what's what I call like a
Speaker 5: rebellion almost.
Speaker 1: Right quick break, right back. Yes, this is now a
Speaker 1: shifting of the guard. Old media, legacy media, state run
Speaker 1: media mob is way more dead than they know, with
Speaker 1: not the influence they once thought they had and then
Speaker 1: maybe ones did have. As we continue our discussion about
Speaker 1: the death of legacy media, the state run legacy media mob. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm not the only person that tells that speaks truth
Speaker 1: or door does these investigations, but I will tell you
Speaker 1: they're an impeachment one impeachment two.
Speaker 2: During the Russia.
Speaker 1: Hoax, there were very few of us that were out
Speaker 1: there unpeeling the layers of the onions, and we had
Speaker 1: an ensemble cast including my radio staff, my TV staff,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, Catherine Herridge. At the time on Solomon,
Speaker 1: and then we had a group of people whose name
Speaker 1: shall remain anonymous that were very helpful to in terms
Speaker 1: of us getting the information correct. We had great sources
Speaker 1: that told us the truth and would give us the
Speaker 1: corroborating information which we pass on to you. I mean,
Speaker 1: part of my job is a talk show host. People say,
Speaker 1: what do you do for a living. You're not a journalist,
Speaker 1: I said, I'm not claiming to be a journalist unless
Speaker 1: you want to call me an advocacy journalist. Now, I
Speaker 1: describe my job description as I'm a member of the press.
Speaker 1: I am a talk show host. I do straight news,
Speaker 1: and I can I can provide thousands of hours of
Speaker 1: radio coverage and television coverage of me just doing straight news.
Speaker 1: We do investigative reporting that no one else in this
Speaker 1: you know, legacy media, state run media mob will ever do,
Speaker 1: vetting Obama, you know, doing the getting to the bottom
Speaker 1: of the Russia hoax, vetting Kamala and Tim things they
Speaker 1: never do, not lying to you about you know, big
Speaker 1: cases like Uva Duke or Freddie Gray Baltimore or Ferguson Missouri.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: But then I also am upfront and honest that I
Speaker 1: give opinion and that I'm a conservative. And then we
Speaker 1: do culture woke, we do sports, we do health issues,
Speaker 1: we do whatever is in the news. We're like an
Speaker 1: entire newspaper.
Speaker 2: You see. Their biggest problem is they claim that they're journalists.
Speaker 2: They're not.
Speaker 1: They are leftist, extreme, radical democratic supporting liberal talk show hosts.
Speaker 1: That's what they are. But they claim to be something
Speaker 1: that they're not, and there in lies the problem. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. I went on longer than
Speaker 1: I wanted here, but I think it's a point. Well
Speaker 1: we'll take it. I mean, I appreciate the president's compliment
Speaker 1: for recognizing the work that we and a few others
Speaker 1: have done.
Speaker 2: There hasn't been a lot of us, I will tell
Speaker 2: you that