WEBVTT - Land Rich: EDR, KKR, SPAX.PVT

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast where we talk

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>about stuff related to money. I'm Matt levian Ton I

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>write the Money Stuff column for.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television. Welcome back, Katie,

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, Matt. You didn't go anywhere, but in my mind,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I took a vacation from me. Yeah, it's been a minute.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 1>For the listener's service has continued uninterrupted, but for us,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been two weeks.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know. I had to remember how to

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>anchor television this morning. I'm currently trying to remember how

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to record a podcast. Yeah.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>No, I also forgot in the in our week off,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it was yeah. Yeah.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>The way this usually goes, though, is we have three topics.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, what are those three topics today? Katy?

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna talk about endeavor. You're on a three

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>day streak of writing about the steal an endeavor. We're

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about the Baby Berkshire boom because that

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>is underway, and then we're going to talk about public

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>private prices, Endeavor. I think when we first spoke about

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>this steal, we ended with something close to watch this

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>space because it was going to close on March twenty fourth,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and it did.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Right. It's funny like I sometimes will write an m

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and a deal will have a lot of drama, and

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'll write about it successively for days or weeks.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's really happened in this deal, like Monday, Like, nothing's

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>happened since like, this company doesn't need this right. So

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Endeavor is a company. It went private. There was like

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a long lead up to it going private, Like they

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>signed their deal about a year ago, silver like the

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest shareholder agreed to take it private at twenty seven

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fifty cents per share, and they announced a

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago that it was going to close this

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>month day, March twenty fourth, and then this Monday, March

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth, it closed at twenty seven to fifty per share,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly on schedule. So not really a lot of news there.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But what was weird is that the previous week it

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>traded well above twenty seven fifty per share, and in fact,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the last day before the closing on Friday, it closed

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at twenty nine dollars and twenty five cents a share,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so like a buck seventy five over the merger price,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and like a lot of shares traded, and you know,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if you know you're going to get cash that at

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to fifty on Monday, it's a little weird

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy this stock at twenty nine to twenty five

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. And you know the reason for that seems

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to be that everyone expects there to be a class

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>action lawsuit saying that the deal was underpriced and they're

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to getting in on that class action.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you had three possibilities.

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So when we talked about it this last time,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of noise about appraisal, which is one

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>way you can basically sue for a better price. But

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that you have to like demand appraisal, and

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there are reasons that can be advantageous to you, but

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like one problem with it is you need to have

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>owned the stock continuously since like early February. The other

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>way to sue to get a better price is just

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a class action lawsuit saying that the board that approved

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the deal was like failing in its footy share I

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>duties to shareholders, and here that's like a pretty tempting

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit because you know, as you talked about last time,

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal price turned out to look really low. You know,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Endeavour's main asset is shares of another publicly traded company, right,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that company traded up a lot, So by now the

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>deal price for Endeavor looks really low, and you know

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's being bought by its controlling shareholder, so there's always

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a conflict of interest there. There wasn't a vote of

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the independent shareholders, like no, like independent person really ratified

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the price, right, like the board did, but like the

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>shareholders didn't. So you know, there's a lot of a

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff for a lawsuit, and people seem to

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be valuing that lawsuit at about a buck seventy five

0:03:59.360 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a share.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll clear this up for me because I was a

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit confused. So there's a possibility of a class

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>action lawsuit, but that is different than the appraisal.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the appraisal is like this price should have been higher, right,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't require any like allegations of wrongdoing. The class

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>action lawsuit is like the board didn't do its fiduciary

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>duty for shareholders, but in this sort of conflicted situation,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like they almost get to the same place, and it's

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit easier to do the class action because

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have held the shares continuously.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So your third explanation was people might have thought.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That Silverlake would recut the deal to give people a

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>better price. But I don't know why they would have

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that, because silver like did say they wouldn't do it,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they didn't do it.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>So it looks like the possibility that your readers seem

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to agree with was that maybe you bought the stock

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>getting on this lawsuit happening.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You bought the stock thinking a lawsuit would happen, that

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be in that lawsuit because you thought

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that lawsuit was worth more than a buck seventy five

0:04:58.680 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a share.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's what carl Icon did.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised if there was any other reason

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for it. But yeah, Carlaikon bought about eight percent of Endeavor.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not exactly clear when because the disclosure doesn't have

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like the trading records, but it kind of seems like

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>he bought it all on Friday.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>As of Friday, he had eight point four percent.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, and there's a lot of shares traded on Friday,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Like he might have bought all of his shares on Friday,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>might have been why the stock spiked, but any caayse Yeah,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>he seems to have bought the stock fairly recently. And

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he's carl iik On like he doesn't mind a lawsuit. No,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't mind getting his hands a little dirty. And

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you know I wrote on Thursday, like, if you're a

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>shareholder who was hoping to get it in on a lawsuit,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like you gotta feel good about this, right, He's gonna

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have some fun with that lawsuit. Yeah, carlaike On on

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>your side complaining about the deal price. I don't know.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like an encouraging fact.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Makes for good TV, makes for podcasting. So perhaps carl

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Icon wanted in on this lawsuit specifically, But there's also

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the possibility that maybe short sellers wanted out question Mark.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know. There's a weird, fascinating history of this,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>so like this is not the first deal that's kind

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of gone like this, where there's been a going private transaction.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks kind of conflicted. Shareholders are disgruntled. The stock

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>trades above the deal price right until the last minute,

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the deal closes, and the shareholders sue, and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like years later down the line, they win their lawsuit

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and they get some money. In that case, if you

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>see a stock trading at twenty nine dollars a share

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know that it's going to be cashed out

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at twenty seven to fifty on Monday, you might be

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>tempted to sell that stock short. Because you sell it

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>for twenty nine dollars, you pay back the twenty seven

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to fifty on Monday, you make an easy buck fifty.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So in a lot of these deals, they end up

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the deal closes and there's some number of shorts, and

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the shorts make a quick profit because the deal closes

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it below the last trade price, and so like if

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they short aed it above the deal price, they make

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it quick profit and then they go about their business.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And years later the class action lawsuit gets decided in

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>favor of the shareolders, and someone like they're broker comes

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to them and says, remember that deal that closed the

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to fifty, and you paid twenty seven to

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty because you were short. Actually the real deal price

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is thirty two dollars, so you owe us another four

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>p fifty there's a lot of like lower on this,

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's not clear like what the actual rules are.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>My understanding is there are people who have done this

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>trade and like years later the brokers have come to

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>them and said you owe us more money and they said, no,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't. We close that are short. What are you

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>even talking about? This is not a corporate action that

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we owe money on. And there are some like finra

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>arbitrations where the customers and the brokers have gone to arbitration,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of I think, gone both ways. There

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>are some where the customers have lost, but some I

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>think where they've won. So there's like an interesting trade

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>here where you can like make a free, risk free

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>profit on your short and years later try to steff

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your brokers so you can keep the profit. But it's

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little dicey.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I don't know, for a good two to

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>three years you did make a profit on that, and

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that has to feel somewhat good.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I get a lot of emails from people to

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be like what if I did this? What if I

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>moved out of state? You know, there's a lot of

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's easy to imagine how you enjoyed your

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>broker's phone call in three years, right, Yeah, I think

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people are very interested in that trade.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So where does this go for here? Like you said,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>usually I keep.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Looking for the lawsuit.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen, like the lost class action loss.

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, usually like you know, lawyers or nut pressure.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So why is that more likely, just judging from the

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>tone of this conversation than appraisal.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, just because like so many shares have traded hands

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>after the appraisal deadline. So like, if you're buying shares

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>at twenty nine dollars last week, yeah, you couldn't be

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>doing it for appraisal because you wouldn't get appraisal. You

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>could have to be buying into the loss of the

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>class action.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Could there be both?

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there could be. Okay, the big case that I

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>read about was Dole, and there were both appraisal. They're

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing. You could imagine an appraisal court

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>saying oh, the actual value of the company was this,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and the class action court saying, oh, like the fiduciary

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>duties you know were violated and that's where this you know,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like they're not the same thing at all, but like

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're kind of roughly the same idea, which is,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you underpaid for this company, give us more money.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So it seems like this continues to be a watch

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 2>this Space situation. There's the promise of drama. It just

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 2>hasn't necessarily happened.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Weird if nothing happened, because people for drama, right.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 2>May be kind of beautiful though, if truly nothing, If

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 2>everyone was like.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a dollar seventy five a shared lawsuit,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that lawsuit, I actually remember STI follow

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit and it just goes away.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I kind of was just like, I don't know, I

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 2>feel possessed to buy eight point four percent of the

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>shares on Friday.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping someone else will bring a lawsuit.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling shy now.

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I told you that I went to the Blue experience.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>That we've almost certainly talked about this. Did I remember that?

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But tell me about it.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>They like build Blue's house in a building near Union Square.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>That sounds kind of fun.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I really like that.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I can have my own children to watch Blue.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, it's very much like a show for parents. Yeah,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very mature. You know what else is uh

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>very mature? The business model?

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, oh, here we go.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>What do you got?

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>What do I got? KKRL?

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not just regular holdings, but strategic holdings, holdings that

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>they will hold for a while, is the plan. Yeah,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I've got about eighteen of them.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen right. So KKR is like historically a leverage biot

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>firm where they manage funds, They raise funds from limited partners,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>They take those funds and they equity checks to do

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>leverage biots. They borrow money to buy companies. They take

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>over the companies, they lever them up, they improve their operations,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they strip off the stuff they don't want, They incentivize managers,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they get everything all nice, and three to five years

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>later they take them public again or sell them and

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get a big check that they return to their limited

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>partners and you know, take twenty percent for themselves. Like

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the traditional LBO business model. And you know all

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>these like LBO pioneers of the eighties and nineties like

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are now giant public companies like KKAR, and they run

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>funds for investors. Like now the term is alternative asset

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>managers because they do a lot besides classic leverage biotes.

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But they still basically do that kind of model where

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they run funds and take twenty percent, and KKR is shifting,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say, or like introducing more of a model where

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what they do is they just on their own balance

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>as a company, buy stakes and companies or infrastructure projects

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and just own them forever and they're just

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>part of the company. They're like a big industrial conglomerate.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting shift.

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the logic here, I mean, looking at Alison mcneely's story,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 2>KKR has this plan to quadruple its earnings for sure

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>over the next decade. Strategic holdings would be a strategic

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>part of that. They also want to build a portfolio

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that kicks off more than a billion dollars a year

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>in dividends. So it's different from the fee model, of course.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, one thing I write is that the

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimate success for a hedge fund is to get rid

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of all of your outside investors and convert to a

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>family office because you've just made so much money for

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>yourself that you'd rather earn one hundred percent of the

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>returns on your investments than.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>They get it.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>It's like a little bit like that, right. The fee

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>model is good enough that ky Care has made a

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and where they do that money. Well, well,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing you do is you transition from being a

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>service writer who collects twenty percent to being just an

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>asset owner and a capitalist, right and you just own

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies instead of owning the twenty percent promote on them.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, one way to analyze what they're doing here

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is like it has been a good enough business for

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>long enough that now instead of KKR being like, we're

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>going to manage funds to buy companies, they'll be like,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll just buy the companies. But it's different for being

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a family office because like most hedge funds are, like

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund management company is privately owned, and transitioning

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to a family office means like the guy who owned

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund now owns all the investments here. KKR

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is not like a guy or even the three you know, Colbert, Cravis,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and Roberts. It's a public company. So the public company

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is sort of becoming its own family office. And like

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the public company is going to own all these investments

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>directly rather than taking fees to run a fund.

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>In a way, it's beautiful, just the natural evolution of things.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't we all aspire to something similar.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, it's like the whole private equity business

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>has done this right. Like private equity was like a small,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>scrappy business taking over like poorly managed companies and like

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>making them more efficient, and that was like so wildly

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>lucrative for so long. And now it's like, we have

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>all this money, we could just own the companies ourselves.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to run funds anymore. Like that's not

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's an exaggeration because most of them, including KKR,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly run funds. But like there's this shift to like

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we can own stuff on our balance sheet.

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in a way, I feel really drawn to this.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I've talked before on this podcast how I

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>really like and admire the old school strategy of just

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>stock picking. This is a little bit different, but you're right,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of the same basis.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Like old school private equity is like people and I

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>would disagree with this, but it's a financial engineering story, right,

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and so like we can put more leverage on this

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>company than the public markets can, right, But this is like, yeah,

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we like that business, let's own it forever.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, think about it. It's gonna compound over time and

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>become better and you just got to be patient and

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna hold this for a few decades.

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Now. I'm with you. I also admire the business to

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>my mind, like what better job could you possibly have

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>than like waking up and being like, here are twelve

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks I want to own, I will buy them, and

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>my job is over the rest of my life.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>The answer is right in front of you being a podcaster, obviously,

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>but I take your point. I find it really compelling.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>And of course this comes as KKRS freeze this. The

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>co CEO said at Bloomberg invest earlier in March that

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 2>basically it's in some ways to become a mini Berkshire Hathaway. Sure,

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone wants to bearned about it, including friend of the

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>show Bill Ackman. I think it is interesting that you

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>do have at least a size of two folks saying

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>that we are basically wanting to model ourselves after Berkshire Hathaway.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You're so young. I feel like, well, you know, people

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be more in Buffett. It's like a lung

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>steady but in the past, like Joe Bay and like

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill grew up in a world where like the pinnacle

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of investing was Warren Buffett right, I do wonder.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I kind of grew.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to be Warren Buffett, but I don't know.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>There was that time during the pandemic where Buffett was

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>getting dunked on a lot by like the Dave portnoise

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of the world. But I feel like he's back in vogue.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's certainlygue among friend of.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>The shop Bill Lackman, like that crowd.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, why wouldn't you want to be Berkshire Hathway.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about their current lineup of investments. So,

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned, eighteen includes lens retailer one eight hundred Contacts,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>which actually texted me today to tell me that it's

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>time to order eight hundred dollars worth of contacts again,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity company Barracuda Networks, also Australian stack food manufacturer, our

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Nose Group, our Knots Group. But anyway, again it's just

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean one eight hundred Contacts. That's a household name.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's cool because it's not like flashy like AI

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of stuff, at least from what I can tell

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>from Alison mcneely's article. Yeah, I could keep going.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are sort of like you know, those are like

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>classic private acuity kind of investments, right, Like, yeah, I'm glamorous,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>like nice cash flow kount of companies. But you know

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>now they just done them directly.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah for me an absolute consumer stable just check about

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred contacts, you.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Are a reliable source of cash flow for kake cars.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Strategic holdings just a little more color there. They own

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>an average twenty percent stake in these eighteen firms. That

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>is about three point seven billion dollars of revenue nine

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars of adjusted earnings, which is a small

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 2>share overall of their operating earnings right now. But they're

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>predicting those strategic holdings will generate one point one billion

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>by twenty thirty.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>The main way I think about this bet is like

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>when you generated enough money during a like high fee,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>high return financial services business, like you can just use

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that money to own things yourself. But there's also like

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you do wonder if there's like pressure on those fees

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>or those returns, right, Like private equity in the eighties,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of low fruit. Later vintages of funds

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>have not always returned as well, And like you know,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>people talk about how there's pressure on private equity exits

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>now and you don't hear a ton about fee pressure

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and private equity, but you hear that something every now

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and then, Like you might be one of these alternative

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>asset matters looking around and saying, like, you know, the

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>long term trend of like financial services fees are like

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kitty Greyfeld keeps telling me that you can

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>get an ETF for one basis point. It's common if

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you think, like, you know, in twenty years, what will

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our earnings makes look like you might say, like we

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>might earn lesson fees, but we'll own all these companies

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that like sell contacts to Katy Greifeld, so we can

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we can we can get our money that way, right,

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Like if you think that fees over time will come down,

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>like owning businesses is the way to avoid that so that.

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>They're future proofing in all. Yeah, Man, if I could

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>go back to the eighties, anything.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Like private equity like feels really institutional that. But if

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you run like I always think, like if you run

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like a crypto exchange, like you got to like take

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>all that money and put it into like laundromats or like.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Like real businesses machines.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you can't rely on like that like lottery

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>winnings to keep continuing, but that you can put the

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>money into a real business like Land. I don't know.

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, yeah, everyone should buy Land. I would

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>love to be land rich. Okay, So we have been

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>talking for months, really the entire existence of this podcast

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 2>about how private markets are becoming public. Private markets are

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the new public market, and now we have some prices

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>to put to that.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I really feel like it's a big step in private

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>markets becoming more public when finance starts putting up like

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>daily or you know, like real time, real time ish

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stock sharts of SpaceX and open a stripe Stripe and

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven or so other private companies that don't trade

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on the stock exchange but that are tracked by enough

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>like private company tracking kind of things that they can

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, here's a stock price chart, and yeah,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>you can go look at a stock price chart of

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all these companies. And that feels like, you know, you

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>could read news articles that were like secondary trading suggests,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stripes values, blah blah blah, but like now you can

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just go look at a chart on your finance. Seems

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>like a big difference, seems like a real step toward

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>making them look public.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate the effort. It's like an opening volley. I

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think these prices are perfect.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>No, they're fascinating the imperfect, right, So, like, these are

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>these prices, Yeah, he gets them from two marketplaces, right,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>two companies that provide a marketplace for you know, like

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of employees ex employees of these companies to sell

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>their stock.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 2>To like Forge and Equities in yeah.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Forge and Equities. Basically, it's like on the selling side

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you have like employees and ex employees of these companies

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who want an exit, and the buying side you have dentists. Right,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Like that's roughly the model. And I was like, those

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>trades have to be like a liquid and small and

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, driven by weird dynamics and not really reflective

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>evaluation of these companies. But if you look at how

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>these prices are, they're not really derived necessarily from those trades.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Like these prices are sort of like algorithmically determined from

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>things like funding rounds and tender offers and also like

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bids and trades on these platforms. But it's unclear like

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how the prices are determined. And you look at some

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of these companies and the prices like don't change very much,

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's just very clear that they're sort of essentially

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pulling in like prices from funding rounds and tender offers.

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's not a real time stock chart. It's like

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>crunch base and chart form, you know, it's like prices

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of funding rounds. It's not like real time secondary market

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trading prices, which.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Again I appreciate. But then you take a look at

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 2>open AI's chart for example, as you mentioned, it is

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty Yeah, it's pretty flat, which is funny and probably

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>again not reflective of real time pricing. When you consider

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the news this week that they're close to finalizing a fork, but.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>There isn't real time. Yeah, the open Eyes stock does

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>not like really trade among like on these secondary trading platforms.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know what I'm saying. It's an example of

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 2>how time not real time. This is they're close to

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 2>finalizing they're forty billion dollar funding around at least according

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg reporting, that would value the company at three

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollars. If this was close to real time,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine you would see the line wiggle a little,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>but it hasn't.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's like psychologically interesting to have like what looks

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like a real time price chart, even if it's not

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a real time price chart, because it just makes you think, ooh,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a company who's stock I can buy. And by

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, you can't necessarily right like.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing, you can try hard.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>These tide fims are like places that will let you

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.239
<v Speaker 1>buy many of these stocks, but it doesn't mean they

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have stock to sell you, right, Like you know, these

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>companies often try to restrict their you know, employees and investors'

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to resell stock. The news this week is both

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Yahoo Finance is taking prices from equity Zen and

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Forged to like show these stock shots, but also that

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>equity Zen and Forger lowering their investment minimums. So now

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you can, if you're an incredit and investor, you can

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>buy stock in these companies with as little as five

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. But again, like that's just that's just like

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>their rules. It doesn't mean that someone's going to sell

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you five thousand dollars basic stock. And in fact, I

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of hard to source a lot of

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the really hot private companies on these platforms.

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm comparing. I hate to talk about ETFs. I

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>just hate them. Att, I'm gon do it right now.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>I know that there's a you know, a subset of

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>listeners who absolutely hate when I bring up ETFs. But

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I just came back from an ETF conference and we

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of fans there. So shout out to

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 2>the friendly to the friendly couple that stopped me in

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas, in the casino, in the Virgin Hotel. In

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>any case, there is this ETF called the er Shares

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Private Public Crossover ETF. The ticker is x OvR Crossover.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>It actually ten percent of its portfolio is SpaceX. This

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 2>is pretty much meaningless, but you take a look at

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the performance of this ETF. It's down about seven percent

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>on a total return basis year to date, and SpaceX,

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>at least according to Yahoo Finance, is at least up slightly.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>According to Yahoo Finance, it went from to eleven per

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 2>share to just under two fifteen per share. Again, this

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 2>is very close to a meaningless comparison, but there is

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 2>some way I guess you could back into what SpaceX

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>is doing. Not really, but I do think it's a

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit interesting. You do have this ETF with real

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>time pricing. We know that ten percent of it is SpaceX.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that doesn't give us real time SpaceX price. Now,

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know how like do the ARB, but

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like I assume that, like Jane Street is not like

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>delivering a basket of a little SpaceX doc to like

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>get shares of X over right, Like in some ways,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like this stuff where like yeah, who's putting up price

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>charts and like you can theoretically get into these private

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>markets with as little as five thousand dollars, Like in

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>some ways that is like psychological signaling rather than like

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a real thing. And it's not like you can go

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>buy five thousand dollars worth of SpaceX and like there's

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a real time chart on Yahoo. But in some ways

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it like is pushing it towards being a little bit

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>more real. So like private markets theoretically are open only

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to accredited and investors in the US, whereas like public

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>markets are open to everyone. But if you look at

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>like the number of people who are accredited, because like

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the accredited standards have not gone up since like the eighties,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Like to be accredited, you need to have two hundred

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year of income or three hundred thousands

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of a couple, or like a million dollars in assets,

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>and that works out to something like twenty percent of

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the population, which is like roughly the percent of the

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>population that like own individual stocks and brokerage accounts. So

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the investor class that like buys public stocks and the

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>investor class that can legally buy private stocks is like

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same class. Kind of, Yeah, you do

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder a little like what is the need for a

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>company to go public? And then conversely, like what is

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the need for it to stay private? Right, because like

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing that CEO sometimes says they don't like the

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>distraction of having a public stock price, and like they

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like managing to the stock price, and they don't

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like the short termsm of like the stock price reacting

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to news. Yeah, like now you have the stock shot

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on your finance that doesn't move very much, but like

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the future, if it moves a lot,

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you might be like, ah, I might as well just

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>go public because my stock price is public anyway. You know.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Another counter with that would be though, that they don't

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>have to report earnings four times a year.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>It's wild to me that like basically retail investors can

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>put five thousand dollars into a stock and there is

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>no expectation nobody cares at all that they will ever

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>see financial statements for the company. Yeah, and like, of course,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of course no one stocks at brokers accounts looks at

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>financial statements for the companies. The hast not get right,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>So like, of course it makes sense that no one

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>cares about saying financial statements. But it's weird that, like

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we have like one hundred years of securities law that's

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>based around, like we need full disclosure about a company.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.199
<v Speaker 1>We need like audited financial statements to allow people to

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>make informed the investing decisions, and everyone's like, no, we

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>don't care about that stuff. Full buy SpaceX doesn't matter.

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 2>But you couldn't directly say that you know, they need

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>them and care about them because they form the basis

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of great articles written by financial journalists

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>who do read the financial statements, et cetera and do

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the work.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely the theory of like public markets is that,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>like there is a lot of work done, you know,

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>including based on like regulated public financial disclosure. There's a

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of work done to make prices efficient. So when

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you buy stocking your broker's account, you are probably getting

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>an efficient price, right, Like you're paying sort of roughly

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, market expected fair value of the company

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with private companies, Like you could probably make similar arguments, right, Like, not, really,

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the financials are not public institutions are not necessarily like

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>trading in the secondary market in large size, Like you're

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of drafting on like venture capitalists valuing the company

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>in funding rounds, and like the incentives that are not

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>quite like it's not quite the same thing as in

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>public markets, where there's like, you know, informed people on

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the trade.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, funding rounds obviously are the basis of these Yahoo

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Finance price charts, all of them.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Suppose I don't secondary market trading, but yeah.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai, I mean, so much has happened in the

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>AI landscape. There's no pricing of what happened with deep

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 2>seek et cetera.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, it would be really funny. It would be

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>really fun like if when the deep seek news had dropped,

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>if you could go to your browser and look at

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a real time stock price for open Ai. Yeah, it

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>would be really really funny. If like it's just a

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>flat lab You're like, wait, where's the reaction?

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>We are actually person in all information that we have

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>available to us.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you the other big open Ai like

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock price thing. The thing that happened a real

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>time price was when they fired sam Altan for a

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>weeknd I wrote about it. At the time they had

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just done I think they finalized like an employee tender.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think at like an eighty four billion dollar valuation,

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, and it almost like they were almost done,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and then like they fired their CEO and then you know,

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>two days later the hard back, and then like they

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>continued doing the tender and then like they finalized it

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was still at eighty four billion dollars,

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote about, like, what a weird fact that

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this news didn't change, like in either direction, didn't change

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the valuation of open.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>It was perfectly priced.

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just like all of it was as expected. Everything

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is totally normal. This is not really true. And then

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like you know they have they like very quickly went

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on to raise it much heart raluations. Actually, this is

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>my way of saying, if you looked at a real

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>time stockhart of open Ai during deep seek and it

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't move, you might be like, oh, that's right, that's

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>how like your cat. Let's think about opening eye.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Just a flat line, you know, and it's still flat

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.239
<v Speaker 2>this week even with studio ghibli. You can do that

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 2>on chat ebt right now. Cool, Well, it's all over

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>my Twitter feed, my X feed right now. I feel

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>like you don't really you're not an excer, I'm an

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 2>X excerpt. Well that's what you can expect if you

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>go there right now. But maybe that would have pushed

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the stock price higher if these were real.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it nice like you're saying like it's all over

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>my X feed? Makes me think, like I understand why

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>CEOs don't like to have a real time stock price.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like this distraction has moved around our stock price.

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just not that.

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>So I talked to a lot of CEOs in my

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 2>other job, which is being a television anchor, and you

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>ask them on air, do you know, do you care

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>about the stock price or you did you notice this

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>in the stock price? And they always say no, I

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>don't really look at the stock price, blah blah blah.

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you get lunch with them, you get coffee,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you ask them in the commercial break and I often

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>get from them, yeah, I'm constantly watching it, and of

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.959
<v Speaker 2>course you are if I had a real time measure

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of my performance, I would never not be looking at it,

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>which I guess is distracting.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>This is like the fastness is theory about private equity,

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>which is that, like it is not less volatile than

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>public stocks, but it reports less frequently and so it

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>feels less volatile and everyone knows that. But his point is,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like that is actually valuable to a lot of investors,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they're willing to pay a premium for

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>private equity, because like, not knowing what the stock price

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is is like really good for you.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean probably, But I'm an intercheck. I read every

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 2>YouTube comment, I read every Spotify comment, I look at

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 2>every tweet tweeted at me. I just am desperate for feedback.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 2>on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff podcast that is produced by Anna Maserakus

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and Moses ONAM and special thanks this week to Cal Brooks.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Naples, Brandon, Francis

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 2>nudimass our executive producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>of podcasts.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff