WEBVTT - Risk, Rates, and Reddit

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney along

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 2>with Tom Keene. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, geopolitics, finance, and investment. You can

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 2>also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>from seven to ten Eastern Remark Global Headquarters at New

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. Let's check

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in with somebody who knows what's going on out there

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 2>in the Market's Christina Hooper. She's a chief global market

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>strategist for Investco. Christina, it's been a busy week here.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've had a lot of central bank movement here.

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>We've had a lot of IPO markets or activity in

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the markets as well. Let's start with the Federal Reserve

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>here and some of the other central banks. Quite frankly,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>what did you take from the Fed and the other

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>central banks?

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Commentary this week?

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Paul, we are headed to an easier environment for monetary policy,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 4>and as I think you know, I've been a big

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>believer that monetary policy has and will continue to drive markets,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 4>and that's why I think we've had such a good week.

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Even in terms of IPOs, Sentiment has gotten more positive

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 4>because we know the end is insight and that we're

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 4>going to start to see rate cuts. In fact, the

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 4>Swiss National Bank gave us a nice surprise this week,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 4>our first present from major developed central banks in terms

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 4>of cutting. But this is just the beginning, and this

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 4>is so different than the environment we saw in twenty

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, where we had surprise rate hikes, a whole

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>flurry of them, so much so that the World Bank

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 4>warned in September of twenty twenty two that this synchronized

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>tightening was something we hadn't seen in many decades. Well,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 4>now we're getting to see what I think will be

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 4>synchronized cuts over the course of this year, which should

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 4>be very supportive for markets.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, could you talk a little bit more about what

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you see as the markets play here, because we've talked

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so frequently on this radio program about how frothy equity

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>markets are getting. So where does an investor go here?

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think an investor needs to be well diversified.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 4>We shouldn't ignore the US, but we do know that

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 4>valuations are much higher here than elsewhere, and so this

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 4>is a great opportunity to sharpen pencils and look around

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:38.279
<v Speaker 4>the world for potential, and that potential can come from Japan. Interestingly,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 4>their central bag is in a different place, just beginning tightening,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 4>normalizing monetary policy. But that is a vote of confidence

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 4>in the Japanese economy, and I think well really spur

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 4>attention more investor interest in the Japanese stock market. Emerging

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 4>markets valuation opportunity abound, and in particular Asia em looks

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 4>attractive right now. There's growth potential there as well as valuations,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 4>and against supportive monetary policy, we're likely to see a

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 4>weakening US dollar, which should help going outside the US.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 4>But again there's still opportunity in the US, so investors

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't ignore it, and I shouldn't be just talking about equities.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 4>There are opportunities in fixed income. We're in a different

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 4>place than than where we've been for years in terms

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 4>of yield. We had lived in a yield scarce environment.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 4>We're not there. I wouldn't say it's a golden age

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>of fixed income. But fixed income looks very attractive, and

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 4>there are a whole variety of areas that we can

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 4>choose from to make a diversified portfolio. Investment great credit

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 4>looks very attractive to me, but certainly opportunities in emerging markets,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>high yield municipals. Again, there is so much an abundance.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>So if you think about twenty twenty two as an

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>anis horribilis for markets, I think that it's something different,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>a very different today and much better environment.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I kin I want to go to fixed income because

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering. I'm just looking at my screen here, Christina,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 2>and I can just go over to a two year

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>United States Treasury and get four points six percent. That

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>seems pretty darn good. I mean, is that the trade

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 2>in fixing com or do I try to take some

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 2>credit risk here and think about investment grade credit or

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe even what really has been the best performer in

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>fixing them, which is high yield.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>How do I think about credit risk?

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm a big believer in diversification and thinking for

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the longer term. I don't think it should be about treasuries.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a lot of opportunity moving out on

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 4>the risk spectrum, investment grade credit to me is a

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 4>sweet spot. But certainly high yield has been a strong performer.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>And given what we're seeing in the US economy, how

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>it looks like a softer landing than we had died.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that makes the case for moving out having

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>exposure to high yield. Don't forget Muni's where there's some

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 4>very attractive yeals right now. So there is a lot

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 4>of opportunity. And of course don't forget emerging market. It's

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>dead in there.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that you like in particular in emerging markets?

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean you mentioned earlier Asia, but anything in Latin America,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>anything in Africa.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly Mexico benefits from a US economy, and so

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I think what we're going to see in the US

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 4>is a pleasant surprise this year. I've been a believer

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 4>that we'd see a bumpy landing. I don't think it's

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 4>going to be as bumpy as I had anticipated, and

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 4>that should be good news for country like Mexico.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Christina, thank you so much for joining us.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Christina Hooper. She is the chief Global market strategist for Investco.

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Big Week in Technology let's get a couple of our

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>top technology analysts.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 3>We got them together here on a Rock.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Na joins us via zoom from Chicago, and Man Deep

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>saying he's here in a Bloomberg interactor broker's studio on Rock.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with you here. I want to start with

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Apple here. The more I read about this, I'm just

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>you know about Apple have facing these anti trust suits

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>both here in the US and abroad, have some regulatory challenges.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if this is a Microsoft thing from

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of the nineties whereby I was kind of a

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>casting a pall over the stock that just couldn't get

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>out of or is it something that this story can

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>power through. What's the early read when you talked to

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 2>investors these days?

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I mouse confess I was surprised by

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 5>the stock reaction yesterday. I mean, everybody knew this was

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 5>going to happen, so why the surprise And that was

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 5>a bit confusing. But having said that, you know, Apple

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 5>generates so much for a cash flow. It is truly

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 5>the bohemoth when it comes to their operating system, and

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 5>people are taking shots at it and this is not

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 5>going to end and it's a big overhang for the

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 5>stock over the next Cinnicks several years. You know, this

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 5>is not going to go through in the next six

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 5>months or twelve months. This is a multi year problem now,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 5>I guess.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Mandy, could you talk a little bit about another issue

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that Apple's been facing. It's had a string of pretty

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bad news about where it is on AI. We have

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>these headlines that just have crossed that Apples and talks

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to use bydos Ai and it's Chinese iPhones. You know,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we had this scoop earlier about the potential tie up

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with Google for AI. I mean, it doesn't look like

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really anywhere and the thing that is most hot

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>among investors, I.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Won't characterize it that way. I think in the end,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 6>Jenni is still so early that you know, when we

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 6>think about who is the real beneficiary, obviously it's Nvidia,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 6>and when it comes to on device Jenni, which is

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 6>where Apple plays in, nobody is a standout. Yes, Google

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 6>has a model, and obviously Apple is talking about leveraging

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Google Gemini. But maybe it's a sound strategy to have

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 6>a Chinese vendor provide the LM for the Chinese phones,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 6>because when it comes to LM chatbot functionality. It's all

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 6>about the local language, the local knowledge that the LLLM embeds,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 6>and it may actually turn out to be a good

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 6>strategy to use local llms wherever Apple has an install base.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>LLM definition Large Language model, which I know that because

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I read the research coming from nDEP and on a

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>rock an rag another Apple issue here, and then maybe

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 2>we can broad it out a little bit. But again

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I probably speak for most Apple investors is

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm still trying to get my head around China. What

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>is the risk there for me China, both from a

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>demand for my products in China and maybe to a

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>lesser extent to supply chain, But that supply chain issue

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>still on the table. Where are you where? Where's the

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>street on kind of sussing out the China risk for Apple.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>So when you look at you know, Apple, let's over

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 5>a ten year history. It really made inroads in the

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 5>US and the Western world, controlling market share. But the

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 5>next big market is China and that's they were doing well.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 5>The phone came out last year. It really underscored that

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 5>there was refresh cycle for that particular phone that hasn't

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 5>happened in years. Consumer weakness in China, and Apple's just

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 5>losing market share at this point in terms of you know,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 5>every quarter when they come out, and it's been a

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 5>very tough market. I don't see that changing at least

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>this year. They really need a catalyst to really go

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 5>out and say that, you know, we can we can

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 5>really work in China. Maybe the LLM, maybe the bartorship

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 5>with Baido is one of them. But having said that,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 5>I don't see any chances that they're going to have

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 5>a big rebound in China at least this year, barning.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It out a little bit. Another really big tech story

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this week is the Reddit IPO. I mean, that's gone

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well. Mandy, canase start with you just to talk

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about what your read is on how enthusiastic investors have

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>been for this, and like, do you think that this

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is really an AI play? Paul is skeptical.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean, as I mentioned yesterday when I was

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 6>on your show, that look, Reddit has got something unique

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to the user data and you know,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 6>having the wide breadth of online communities, and that is

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 6>I think, really something that stands out versus other social

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 6>media platforms which are far bigger than Reddit. So the

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 6>criticism that I get from investors is it's an eighteen

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 6>year old company that it's not profitable, and for the

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 6>first ten years of its existence it didn't even have

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 6>an ADS model. So it's really in the last five

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 6>years they've started layering ADS and the IPO is coming

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 6>at a good time with this whole JENNYI wave because

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 6>everybody needs to train their models and if you're looking

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 6>for tech's corpus, Reddit is the go to place. So

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 6>to my mind, any product with stickiness where users come

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>to your platform every day, and in reddits case, they

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 6>need to boost their daily active users. Their monthly active

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 6>users is far higher than their daily active users. If

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 6>they're able to execute on that, I think they'll do

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 6>quite well in terms of the first six months of

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 6>the IPO.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you were dead on yesterday.

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>You're bullsh yesterday you're against my skepticism here. Stock rallied

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.359
<v Speaker 2>just big time there, So good news for the redifilks,

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>good news for the IPO market, even after we had

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that astera of the day before. Also a big aiplan

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>net stock is training really well on the IPO market.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey Anna Rod, I think you know the name that

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I know you've been panning the table on a lot.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Is Microsoft here? What's the latest call here?

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 4>On?

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft is still firmly in that magnificent I don't know

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>whether it's five or seven, what it is these days,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>but what's the call here?

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 5>I think in the software world, if you want to

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 5>just pick one company that is truly exposed to AI

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 5>in the most direct way, it is Microsoft right now.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 5>And I don't see anything changes. I'm actually surprised they

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 5>can go out and pays sic center fifteen million and

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>hire so many people and nobody says anything about it.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, maybe this is the new way of acquiring companies.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it is remarkable the amount of money they're

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 5>spending on both on expanding their data centers for cloud

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 5>as well as AI. I see them, you know, differentiating

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 5>their more compare to others over the next few years.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But I guess one thing, can we just can I

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>just keep with this point any ark, because with Microsoft

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they're spread across so many different areas. I mean, you

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>start to feel like that old anti trust sort of

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>vibe is starting to come back for Microsoft, that regulators

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>might start getting really really worried.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, as soon as you get a decent amount of

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 5>free cash flow. You will see the regulators come in.

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 5>But I mean, this is nothing that they haven't dealt

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 5>with in the past. There's not one tech company right

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 5>now that's not dealing with them, and I don't think

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 5>that's going to change.

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it stocks up. I mean, first of all,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a three point two trillion dollar market cap company.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just amazing.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Year to date, the stocks up fourteen percent, trailling twelve months,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>up sixty percent pe on the June twenty four it's thirty.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Six times, you know. But you know a lot of

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 3>folks will tell you, hey, we'll grow into that. All right.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Mandy, you cover so much in the tech space. What's

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>your top idea here? What are you guys talking about

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the most these days?

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, right now, our top focus idea is Alphabet

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 6>because all the criticism they've been getting and you know

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 6>the fact that everyone is talking about them losing share

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 6>and search. We got one validation that there are no

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 6>more behind in terms of large anglid model race with

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 6>Apple considering you know, Google Gemini to be the model

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 6>and not Open AI or any other models out there.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 6>And look, when it comes to search, I think Google

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 6>has the best platform when it comes to add tech

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 6>and time and again we see that. You know, with

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 6>other social media platforms, they're not able to monetize their

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 6>user base and engagement as well as Google does. And

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 6>you see that with Reddit, you see that with Twitter.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 6>That's why Google search is so unique, because they're able

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 6>to monetize it far better than everyone else. So I'm

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 6>in the camp that they will hold on to their

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 6>search share. In fact, the search market will grow as

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 6>a result of the large anglid models, and Google will

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 6>be a beneficiary.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Google, googg I'm sorry. Goog l is a

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>ticker for the pros out there. It's got a market

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>cap at one point eight billion dollars.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>The stuck is trillion. Thank you very much for that correction.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. You even beat out Rich Truman on that.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Stocks up five percent year to date, up forty two

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>percent trailing twelve month. Anurag Ran A man Deep Singh

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>a couple of our top top leaders in technology research

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>They drive the business.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk energy here and sustainable energy, and to do that,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the folks we like to check in with

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>is Jonathan Maxoy. He's a CEO and co founder of

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>sustainable development capital. The name says it all. He joins

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>us here on a Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. He was

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>also the author of a new book which I will

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Plug the Edge, How competition for resources is pushing the

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>world and its climate to the brink, and what we

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>can do about it. Jonathan, thanks so much for joining

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>us here. Did we have President Biden in the administration

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>do something with liquefied natural gas and people in the

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>energy patch? An, I'm so happy about it. What's going

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>on there?

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, a couple of weeks ago there was a

0:14:54.800 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 7>moratorium on exports new export licenses though export of liquefied

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 7>natural gas to Europe. I'm in putting this into context.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Europe had to scramble for gas after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 7>And where do you get it from? Well, you know, Kata, Norway.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 7>But actually one of the biggest, if not the biggest

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 7>exporters is the United States. Right So now, having said

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 7>all of that, we had an announcwerment this week from

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 7>the White House to say, don't worry, you know it

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 7>will be within a year. We'll let these new export

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 7>licenses come back. There was already just to put this

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 7>into context, about fifty billion cubic feet per day authorized.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 7>That's three times the level of today's exports. So this

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 7>isn't anything to panic about in the short run. Now

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 7>this was dressed or explained as a climate initiative. Now

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm in the sustainability business, I would love to think that.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm also expecting having said that, that some thought has

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 7>had to be given to what it could do to

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 7>US prices. Do you know how much more expensive it

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 7>is to buy gas in the versus the United States?

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 7>A lot four to eight times on average over the

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 7>last five years or so, And it's never really over

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 7>the last decade been cheaper other than in one month,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 7>which was in COVID when everything went upside down. So

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, this is a big issue for Europe. It's

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 7>a huge opportunity for the United States to step into

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Russia's shoes here.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So if it's a huge opportunity for the United States,

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it does still seem to me that President brien has

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>just kind of completely undercut that potential advantage, or am

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I missing something?

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 7>I think there's a moratorium. The White House has effectively

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 7>said the moratorium is pretty short lived, and it won't

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 7>really affect anything in the short run. I think the

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 7>bigger picture really for the US, it's an extraordinary energy position.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 7>It's energy independent, it's the largest largest exporter actually potentially

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 7>of oil and gas in the world. So this is

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 7>quite a challenge. Actually, this is now a big Petra state.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 7>What do you do in a changing environmental and climate world?

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we're a sustainable development capital. Where are

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>you guys deploying your capital these day? Is where do

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>you think is some of the greatest opportunities.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 7>So look, half of half of our investment, maybe more,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 7>is actually coming into the United States, So we invest

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 7>in a different type of solution to everybody else, whether

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 7>most of the money is focused. This is big business.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 7>Energy is one of the biggest business in the world.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 7>Nine trillion has been invested in renewables. So if you

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 7>think of US as somebody in the clean energy sector,

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 7>you would expect as maybe to be building wind farms

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 7>or sellar parks and plugging it into the grid. The

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 7>place that we get excited actually is what with the

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 7>customer rather than the grid. You're going to have to

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 7>spend California alone is going to have to spend eighty

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 7>billion to build out its grid over the next decade,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 7>just to transport the existing energy systems. If I told

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 7>you as I do when I come on your show,

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 7>how nuts it is that in the United States in

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Europe about two thirds to seventy percent of the primary

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 7>energy is wasted or lost before it gets to the point.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I never understood that again, So after seventy percent of

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the energy produced just gets wasted, it goes up into

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the right the air, of the atmosphere, of the everywhere else.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I'll unpack it very quickly, but because it is extraordinary,

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 7>it's the biggest dirty secret of the energy sector, and

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 7>I'll just unpack it to begin. It's why I wrote

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 7>the book actually, and thousands of people read it, and

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 7>if anybody would like to take casure with it, I'd

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 7>love to get your email. So the biggest loss of

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 7>energy happens actually in centralized energy systems. Gas and nuclear

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 7>are two of the largest other than coal, and the

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 7>two of the largest producers of electricity, for example, in

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 7>the United States. The problem is when you put either

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 7>a gas molecule in a turbine or frankly nuclear fuel

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 7>and a power station, only about half of it turns

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 7>into electricity. What happens to the other half, it turns

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 7>into heat. Now, if that heat is being produced very

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 7>far away from the energy load, in other words, where

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 7>the demand is what happens to it, well, not nothing,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 7>it gets it just disappears into the atmosphere. Ultimately, the

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 7>bits that do escape into space, they don't need it

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 7>up there. So that's the biggest part of the loss.

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 7>It's what they call thermal loss is at the point

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 7>of generation. The solution to that is to generate closer

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 7>to where you need the energy, and then you could

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 7>use the heat, but we don't. There are other bits

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 7>of loss which happen. You lose about ten percent on

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 7>extracting and converting oil and gas, for example, into pipelines.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 7>Why do I talk about oil and gas as a

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 7>sustainability guy, because eighty percent of the world's energy still

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 7>fossil fuels or oil, gas and coal. And then the

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 7>last piece of it is transmission and distribution systems. Washington,

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 7>I was there yesterday and I'm unbelievably happy to see

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 7>that they're looking on the demand side of this too.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 7>Now because everything's been about grid, good grid, you know,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 7>we need to invest in more in the grid. That's

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 7>just to get the energy for miles away into town.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 7>But do you know what, five to ten percent of

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 7>it gets lost through transmission and distribution system. So you

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 7>added out ten percent plus fifty percent plus ten percent.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 7>And the Lawrences live in more national laboratories. Numbers they

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 7>produce every July show that now in the United States,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 7>seventy percent of primary energy is lost before it gets

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 7>to the point of use.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible, that's an incredible statistic.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have just got back.

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 7>But you know, I think, as I said I was

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 7>in DC yesterday, I'm not going to give away in

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 7>particular confidences, but I'm I think this is now the

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 7>big story of the next decade. You know, here we've

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 7>what do we do? You know we've got.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Are there technologies to reduce that number?

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, Technologies that have existed for a decade, that are

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 7>cost competitive and that are cheaper, cleaner, and more reliable.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 7>I'll give you a few examples in the United States,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 7>and we're one of the biggest investors in this space.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 7>Rooftop solar and storage car ports where you can plug

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 7>directly to the buildings, on site generation. We run on

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 7>site generation for some of the biggest and most important

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 7>steel mills in the United States. So not all of this,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 7>and that's basically using recycled gases, same stuff turbines and

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 7>engines that people use to generate energy in the middle

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 7>of nowhere. Instead we capture the waste gases and we

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 7>make energy for power and steel on site. Cutting cost,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 7>cubon and improving reliability data centers is a huge issue, right,

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it can't go a conversation without talking AI.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 7>I think it's impolite these days. I'll do it, But

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 7>that AI alone should be about three percent of global

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 7>energy and I demand by the end of this decade. Right,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 7>but how are you going to get the power to

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 7>the data centers? How are you going to cool them?

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Did you know?

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 7>By the way, for every unit you put into a

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 7>data center of electricity, only zero point sixty five units

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 7>of compute come out the other side. So this is

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 7>the flip side of my point. Even when energy's got there,

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 7>it gets lost at the point of use. So what

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 7>do you do? You improve the mechanic corner, electrical equipment,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 7>better heating, cooling, In the case of data centers lighting.

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 7>This is the biggest total addressable market in the energy sector,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 7>not actually about generating more but wasting less.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 3>See there's somebody that actually does something for a living.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm my whole wife on wallship pushing paper around.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not These guys actually do stuff.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Now, it's impressive.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>I know. All right, So let me just let's go

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>over this again, folks.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Maxwell, he's a CEO, he's a co founder Sustainable

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Development Capital who's also the author of this book, The Edge,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 2>How competition for resources is pushing the world and it's

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>climate to the brink, and what we can do about it. Again,

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>this is to me, this is the energy lost guy.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 2>He's my energy lost guy. I didn't even know that

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>was really a thing, but it's a thing. Jonathan, thanks

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>so much for journeys. We really appreciate it. Best of

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 2>luck on that. Keep us up the date on what

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 2>you guys are doing, what the investments are, and what

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>our good friends Don and Washington could do to help us.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, folks, you're daily look at the front pages

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>around the world. At least miteo what he got for

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>us from the newspapers.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 8>So it's Friday, right, so I figured we do a

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 8>getaway Friday, little travel theme going here. All right, we'll

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 8>start with something on the Bloomberg Boeing directors.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 9>They're planning to meet next week with top executives.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 8>From some of their largest airline airline customers who are

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 8>obviously frustrated, frustrated for obvious reasons. One person who won't

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 8>be there though, sources a Tay Bloomberg at CEO Dave Calhoun.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 9>So that's kind of interest.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he's they say he's supportive.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 9>Of the sessions. Okay, but he won't be there.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 8>Who will be there as Larry Kellner, he's the chairman

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 8>of Boeing's board, two other three other directors. But it

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 8>just shows that growing frustration that I guess people have

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 8>with him.

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, if you're not gonna have the CEO there,

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>what is the benefit? What's the upside versus? What is

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the message? Is there a sense that he'll do more

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>harm than good, that he's not the one that people

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>want to see because they're so angry. What's the deal

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with that?

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>But I mean it's a good it is you can

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>make spin. It is a good optical issue here, which

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>is the board going out to the big customers saying listen.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>You have our attention here, you have our undivided attention. Yeah,

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>we're not coming here telling you anything. We're coming in

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>here to listen.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>What do you need?

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll take that back to our management team. Maybe maybe

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a good thing, but I don't know. It's just

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>amazing how this has happened. And we remember asking George Ferguson,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 2>who covers Boeing for Bloomberg Intelligence, he's covered the company

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 2>for decades. He's never seen it like this, where there

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>are so many quality issues here. So these are unusual

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 2>times and maybe some unusual strategies here.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 8>They're definitely gonna get some unfiltered feedback. Yes, you can say,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 8>all right, So have you guys ever lost your luggage

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 8>when you've traveled?

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Have you?

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't check anything, you don't check to check. Thinks

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 3>since like the eighties, So you fit it all in

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a little back. I go to Europe for two weeks

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>with a Duffel bag.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, Oh my gosh, you're my hero.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 9>Right, that's what I say. Have you ever lost the

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 9>luggage jen.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>A long time ago? Yeah, but I did get it back.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 8>You did get Okay, that's the problem. So back in

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty two, there was a rise in this right,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 8>A lot of people started losing their luggage, so airlines

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 8>started working to fix the problem.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 9>Most of them did better. In twenty twenty three.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 8>This is according to the Transportation Department. Nine major US

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 8>carriers actually did better, except four United. They mishandled bags

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 8>more than eleven percent worse than in twenty twenty two.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 9>But they still perform.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 8>Better than American airlines, which is usually performing better. So

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 8>they did worse too. A lot of people going using

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 8>Apple air tags to find the rest. That's when you

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 8>use you you do use that, Okay, so they use

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 8>Apple air tags. Allegiant actually performed the best when it

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 8>comes to not losing your luggage, but they this is

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 8>all happening as you hear about, you know, the airlines

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 8>raising the.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 9>Fees for the checked bag.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 8>So it's kind of like you're losing them, but I'm

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 8>paying more exactly to jacket.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>It's frustrated. I don't know.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>On the apps now, at least on the United app,

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>you can track your bag and see exactly kind.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 3>Of where it is. Okay, yes, I really, yeah, So

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of new thing on the United app.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So you don't need the air tag. I would still

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>get the air tag.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 3>I would trust the air tag.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:34.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah I do.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 9>But does the air tag take you actually to where.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The like it does?

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 6>It does?

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 2>And I had sitting on a tarmac and like, you know, Newark. Okay,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that's not good.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>No, but that's that's how I managed to get my

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bag back when I had a delay because it was

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting at on the tarmac and they're like, they're all here.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, look at my phone. I can see my

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bag is on the tarmac.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 9>See. So that does work.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 8>Okay, see, you solve it all. Right, here's something interesting.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 8>So you have you know, everybody the miles, right you

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 8>join the programs. If you don't have enough miles for

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 8>a free flight, you can now borrow them from your kids.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 8>This is through a new program the United Airlines. It's

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 8>letting people pull share their frequent Flyer points with family

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 8>and friends.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 9>So here's how it works. Let me break it down.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 8>So the group leader has to be over eighteen, but

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 8>there is no minimum age for others. So that's how

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 8>you can sign up your kids. So everyone in the

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 8>pool has to have their own United Frequent Flyer account.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 8>People like you have Jet Blue, Spirit Frontier. Like the

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 8>smaller airlines they do this, they do the pooling, but

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 8>United this is a first airline to the first major

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 8>airline to actually do this.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So well, we kind of like, you know, the Netflix

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 2>password things, So the kids get get booted off of

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>my Netflix accounts because they've been mooching off me for years.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Same thing for the United miles. I mean, I've been

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>very benevolent with my miles with the kids, but I

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>mean I can't imagine the day when I'm going to

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>get any of their miles.

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 9>I was about to say, I don't think they travel

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 9>more than.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You wait trip, Yeah, some Christmas present if you're a

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>little short of cash, have my miles.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 9>Right, Oh see, there you go.

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but it's true because a lot of people have

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 8>been complaining about the miles, so this might be a little.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Bit of perk.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 8>Finally, package holidays, you know those all in packages includes flights, hotels, transfers, food, everything.

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 8>They're becoming the hot new thing again. Okay, apparently it

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 8>took a hit because with the Internet people put their

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 8>own packages together. It was mainly a baby boomer thing,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 8>but the younger travelers they're starting to get more sophisticated.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 8>They wanted these offers and they want hassle for you vacations.

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 8>They just want people to do the work for them.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Here we go in September, going back to the motherland

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in Ireland. They can't wait to see me, by the way,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 2>so we're gonna go over there. And we were looking

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 2>at it like all the books, all the websites do

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 2>and all that kind of stuff, and I'm like, we

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 2>can't do this, we.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Don't want to do this.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 2>We walked across the street and said, hey, here's how

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 2>much money I have. Here's kind of where I want

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to go. And literally half hour later they came.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Back with a proposal. Bum I said, Okayank done.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That is fantastic. That is the way forward. That is

0:27:58.560 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the future.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 8>I e.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That's beyond old.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 3>Old fashioned travel agents, you know.

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 9>So does include the food and all that kind of transfer?

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's a tour, so the only thing so

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 2>they book you on some schlocky seats on United.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 3>So I just use some of my mouths to upgrade

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 3>because you know, I'm not sitting in the back, you

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 3>know me please.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So but other than that, they took off everything and

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I think for some of the I don't know some

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>of the more advanced trips.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 3>It kind of makes sense still. I don't know.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even sure what I paid for it, but

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of a fee, but it was definitely worth

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 2>it whatever it was.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>You'll be in Ireland, you'll go to a pub, but

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it'll be exactly.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 3>What would go wrong.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 9>I think it just makes sense too.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean, just for families traveling, it's easier to have

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 8>that all inclusive, so you're not thinking about having to

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 8>dish out cash and how much who I got to

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 8>give this much to?

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 9>It's just all taken care of.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I should have done all inclusive when my kids were

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a little because when you check out after a week,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>you get a bill that's like fifty pages.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, long because it's.

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Every smoothie, every beer, every soda, and it just kills you.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>As now you go to all inclusive, you literally walk

0:28:57.800 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>out the last day, you don't do anything you've done.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 9>You can even include gratuities in there if you want.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so anyway, a different way to go. So all right,

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>good stuff there. Lisa Mitteo here traveling and between now

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>in September. I don't travel anywhere because I'm at the

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Jersey Shore, people can come to meet.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 3>There's no place in a world I'd rather be.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>in economics, geopolitics, finance, and investment. You can also watch

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the show live on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings from seven

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to ten Eastern from our global headquarters in New York City.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>you listen, and as always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and The Bloomberg Business Apple