WEBVTT - The Invention of the Odometer

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Today

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Unstuffed to Blow your Mind, we have another invention themed

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>episode for you. We're gonna be talking about something that

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>might initially seem frightfully dull or at least very commonplace,

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is the odometer. I mentioned this to Rachel

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier and she was like, oh, yes, the device that

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>measures odors. Yes or odo's. If you were to read

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the word wrong, you might think it says autometer, um,

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's yes, the odometer. So everyone other you probably

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>know this device best is the little counter in your vehicle,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the records how far you've driven. And I think we

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to think of this invention mostly as a self

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>centered device. It tells us how far we've driven on

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>our trip, how many miles or kilometers we've racked up

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on our vehicle. But you know, there's another way of

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the odometer, and this, certainly this is something

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that plays into and into the history of the invention

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and also our attempts to understand its place in the

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ancient world. Is that an odometer can also be a

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>method of determining distances on given routes. It's something that

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>turns a vehicle into a tool from measurement, right, So

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it gives you information that would be useful to

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>other people, because I mean, in the ancient world, you

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have Google Maps or anything. You might know that

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>there are two cities, and you might know that you

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get from one of them to the other by following

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the road to the west, but you might not know

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>how long it's going to take you to get from

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>one to the other. So it would be very useful

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you actually had some standard distance measurements that would

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>allow you to estimate the length of the journey and

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to know how much you need to pack for the

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>journey and so forth. Yeah, we've talked before about the

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the the important things that make up an

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>empire and make an empire or a kingdom function, and

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there are things like standardized measurements, of course, and standardized currency.

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But another thing that would be useful is indeed, like

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, to know how long it takes to get

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>from one place to another, what is the distance from

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one place to another, from border to border from port

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to capital, from frontier to ford and sofa forth. And

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of thing that would of course

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be important for warfare, but also for trade and just

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 1>general management of a given territory. So on one hand,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine this situation, and you can and you

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>can think about what an odometer is, and knowing that

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>an odometer has uh some of its history in the

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ancient world, you might think, well, this is the this

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is the route we take to get to the invention.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the necessity, uh that is the mother of

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this invention. But this doesn't necessarily seem to be the case,

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss, as we look at at its history

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>both in the east and in the west. Now, I

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth thinking at least just a little bit

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about maps and cartography here, because it's easy for for

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the mind to go there, like I need to know

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the exact distance between X and Y because I want

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>an accurate map, right, Uh. To kind of go hand

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in hand when we think about maps today, Like even

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>if I'm looking through a Dungeons and Dragons book, I

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have a map of some sort of fantastic region, and

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>then I have a little indicator to tell me exactly

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>how how many miles and inches or something to that effect. Oh,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>once you get into D and D, though, I feel

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's often very loosey goosey about travel distances. Oh yeah,

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and um and as a when I am dungeon mastering,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I I am also I hate it when there's like

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a really specific question about distances, like, well, is it

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is it one mile or two mile? It's like, I

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's just it's however long it takes to

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>get there. But any well, my experiences, you want to

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a queue from the d M

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>basically like, is this a journey where things will happen

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on the journey or a journey where we will just

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>magically arrive at the destination? Yes, sometimes the magic is

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the journey, but sometimes it most definitely is not.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So thinking about this the situation about figuring out knowing

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>what the distances are between one place in the other,

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about the role of maps in the ancient world.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I turned to one of my my favorite go to

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>text for a lot of this sort of thing, Brian

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Fagan's The seventy Grade Inventions of the Ancient World, And

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's several different chapters in there, the deal

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with measures and maps. Uh and of Fagin and his

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>co authors point out, I think a few important things

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about ancient maps that we might want to have in

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>our head as we proceed. So, first of all, they

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.679
<v Speaker 1>point out, the Chinese maps of old were more about

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>landscape features. So the journey from X to Y is

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more about the details of the landscape and the markers

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that are passed on the way. Yeah, that makes sense,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>navigating by landmarks. Yeah, and so the maps would reflect that.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Another thing they point out is that while local maps

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world we're one thing, as we're specialized maps,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>broader maps of the world or region, we're not really

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the overall ancient approach to maps. There were

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>no regular standards of map making, and there were no

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>general purpose maps. And uh, this is one quote from

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the book I thought was rather telling quote between them rulers, generals, sailors,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and traders evidently all but ignored the practical assistance that

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>maps could afford them. That's surprising. Yeah, I mean hindsight

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty but uh, yeah, it's interesting to look back and

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>think about what benefits this broader approach to maps general

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>purpose maps, etcetera. Could have afforded them, So I think

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>all that's worth keeping in mind as we proceed here.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>None of this is to say peoples during these eras

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>were not concerned with precise distances, but the relationship with

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>exact maps wasn't quite the same as what we have

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>now now. Another way of thinking about what came before

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there certainly were ways of measuring long distances

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>before the invention of the mechanical odometer. Though there is

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some question about the relative accuracy of early mechanical methods

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>versus pre mechanical methods, and one case study here that

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we should look at. It's very interesting puzzle

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that emerges if you look at a geography chapter of

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The Natural History by by our old friend Plenty of

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Elder. Here I'll be referring to the Bostock and

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Riley translation for those not familiar. Plenty of the Elder

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was a first century Roman military commander and author, and

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Natural History is an early attempt at creating a

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of world encyclopedia. So Plenty covers everything from mining

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and metallurgy to botany and zoology, cooking, politics. It's just

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just a book of everything, and in book six

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Natural History, Plenty sets out to describe, quote,

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>an account of countries, nations, sees to ounds, havens, mountains, rivers, distances,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and peoples who now exist or formerly existed. Very good

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>chapter heading there. One of the chapters within this volume,

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>chapter twenty one, is on the nations of India, as

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>known to Plenty at the time. Again, this is the

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>first century CE. So Plenty says that India is a

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>vast country with over a hundred kingdoms, dozens of rivers,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>uncountable mountains, but he will undertake to describe some of

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it by following the path of Alexander the Great, who

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>led a conquering army to India about four hundred years earlier.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So Plenty rights quote, however, that we may come to

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding relative to the description of these regions.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>We will follow the track of Alexander the Great. Diagonitis

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Biton, whose duty it was to ascertain the distances

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and length of his expeditions, have written that from the

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Caspian Gates to hecatom Pylon, the city of the Ptarthians,

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the distance is the number of miles, which we have

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>already stated and he mentioned a number earlier, and then

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he goes on and that from thence to Alexandria of

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the ri I, which city was founded by the same king,

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the distance is five hundred and seventy five miles, and

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>from thence to Prophesia, the city of the drag Ni,

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ninety nine miles. And from here he

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just goes on and on, listing distances. It's this many

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>miles to the next city, and this many miles to

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the next city. Uh. So he attributes all of these numbers,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>all of these distances and miles that he comes up

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>with for this path leading into India to these two figures,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Diagnetis and Biton. Who were these guys well, they were

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>known as Bimatists, coming from the Greek word meaning step

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or pace. I looked up Bimatists in the Oxford Handbook

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>of Classics, and the entry does identify them as the

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the surveyors essentially of Alexander the Great Uh and names

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a few other ones. In addition to the two already

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Byton and Diagnetus. It also names uh Philonides of Crete,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who it says in a side note, was a celebrated

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>distance runner, and the entry also notes that the two

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>figures who worked for Alexander, Byton and Diagnetus, as well

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>as some others quote had literary aspirations. Their measurements of

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>key distances in the empire comprised an archive later controlled

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>by Seleucus. The first individual Bemetists published their observations in

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>monographs termed stath moy or Stages, which combined precise calculations

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of distance with more exotic reports of the flora, fauna,

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and customs of the empire. The latter tended to the outrageous,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but the measurements were of lasting value and provided Eratas

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Knees with the framework for his geography of Asia.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Aretas the Nees, you might recall, was an really figure,

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a Greek philosopher who with pretty startling accuracy, calculated the

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>actual size of the sphere of the Earth. And he

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>did that just using knowledge of the distances between locations

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of different latitudes and then the use of the angles

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of sundials. Basically, yeah, So, how did the Bematists actually

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>measure distances in the time of Alexander the Great? Well,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some disagreement on this, some sources imply that

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they simply counted paces, so you'd walk and count how

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>many steps you took, while others suggest that they used

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some kind of mechanical device. One of the weird things

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is that, as far as we can tell, most of

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the distances recorded by bematists such as Biton and Diagnetis,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as others from the ancient world, are surprisingly accurate.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>On this point, I want to quote a book I

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was looking at by a American historian named Donald W. Ingalls.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The book is called Alexander the Great and the Logistics

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Macedonian Army from the University of California Press

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy eight. And explaining a table in his

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>book of the bimatists different estimates of the distances between

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>cities on this route, ingles rights quote the overall accuracy

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the bimatists measurements should be apparent. The minor discrepancies

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of distance parentheses only one point three percent from herat

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to begrum, can be adequately explained by slight changes in

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the tracks of roads during the last twenty three hundred years.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The accuracy of the measurements implies that the bimatists used

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a sophisticated mechanical device for measuring distances, undoubtedly an odometer,

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>such as described by Heron of Alexandria. So there's a clue.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh Ingles here says, Look, the distance is given by

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>these these people who worked for Alexander the Great and

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>other immotists of the era. They're just too accurate. They're

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>too good to be the result of trying to count

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>your steps and estimate from that. They have to be

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>using some kind of machine that we don't know about,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and one good candidate is a machine like the one

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>described later by Heron of Alexandria. Now, this idea that

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they may have simply been walking, on one hand, I

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can't help but think of the Monty Python ministry of

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>silly walks and imagine like a specific, ridiculous but regular

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>date that they're using, and and if they were super

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on their steps and counting their steps, maybe that

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>would explain why they're reports of flora and fauna are

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so outrageous. They're like, well, I was it was. It

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was three thousand, eight hundred and seventies six steps. And

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to the left there may have been a dragon. I'm

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I was just really focused on these steps

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and getting the step count right. I mean, descriptions of

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>local flora, fauna, and people's of the world are notably

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hilarious throughout all kinds of ancient texts, including Plenty himself.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>He loves to talk about people who had like eyes

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in their stomachs and stuff. Yeah. I keep hoping one

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>day I'll come across a passage in Plenty where he

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>mentions people who have crab clause. I haven't found that yet. Oh,

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to have to look into that, I mean,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned it's it's of course not just Plenty

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in his writings and travelers that he's sourcing, and we

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed similar things in Chinese traditions as well, So

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there have to be some crab claude individuals out there somewhere.

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But okay, sorry to Hero or Heron of Alexandria. Multiple

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>sources I found point to a device described by this

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>first century mathematician and inventor, sometimes known as Hero, sometimes

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>known as Iron, but he was from Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>As you can tell by the name. A lot of

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>inventions are attributed to Hero, though some of the most

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>famous ones probably predated him, and he just described them

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in lectures and writings, and then later that gets sort

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of mistaken for him having actually invented the thing in

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the first place. In the latter category. One example, in fact,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous devices associated with Hero is

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the Yala pile, which is a type of early steam

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>engine converting the power of steam into rotational energy. Basically

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it works, but you've got a big cauldron this full

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of water, and then you put a fire underneath it,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and then that cauldron is connected by pipes to a

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sphere that can rotate around the pipes, and then the

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>sphere has two little exhaust nozzles that allow steam to

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>escape as the water boils and turns into steam and expands.

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But the way the nozzles are oriented, they're oriented in

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the same rotational direction, so as the as it gets

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hotter and hotter and the cauldron and the steam pressure

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>builds up, it spins the sphere faster and faster. Yeah,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of images of this, as I recall,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing a cool woodcut of this, I think

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at one point um but it has a look of

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of a novelty of a device that's that's illustrating the

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>principle here, but but of course not putting it to

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of work that later UH steam engines would.

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>For sure. Yes, and though the e Allo pile is

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>often associated with UH, with Hero, I think this is

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>something that he very likely did not actually invent. It

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was just something he described that already existed. UM. But

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we have talked about other machines possibly invented by Hero

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in previous episodes. One that I remember is the Hero

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of alexandrias In is credited with inventing the first vending machine,

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which strangely was also a piece of religious technology. It

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was a machine designed to dole out limited portions of

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sacred water within Egyptian temples when a devotee would insert

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the right amount of coinage. So I think you'd put

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a five drachma or five drama piece in through a

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>coin slot, and then that would operate a weighted lever

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that would dispense a certain amount of holy water, and

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then once a certain amount of water had gone out,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the machine would tip over and then it would close

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the valve and stop dispensing. Though even in this case,

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I read that it's actually possible Hero was simply describing

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a device that had already been invented by two Cbs

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of Alexandria in the third century BC. So, as with

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ancient inventions, it's often hard to tell

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>if somebody actually invented something or if they're just talking

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>about something that already existed. Anyway, I found multiple references

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to Hero either inventing or describing an odometer, as evidenced

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>by a passage he wrote in a minor work called

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dioptera, which I wanted to find the full text for,

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but if it has been translated into English, I was

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>unable to find it, so I don't know if that

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>even exists in English. But regarding this, this machine he

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>describes in the diopter again, the Hero is first century CE.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>A couple of caveats. One is that he Hero was

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely not the first known author to describe an odometer

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in Greek. In the Greek and Latin Corpus, the Roman

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>engineer Vitruvius, who lived in the first century BC, so

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>century before Hero, also describes an odometer, uh, though in

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different way. I'll get into the differences in

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But even Vitruvius does not claim to have

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>invented the device out of whole cloth. And then there's

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a second caveat which is that remember again Ingles making

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the comment that Alexander the Great's bimatists must have had

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a device like Heroes. The problem here is that hero

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of Alexandria and Vitruvius both lived along after the conquest

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of Alexander the Great. So if it's true as Ingles

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>suggests that these bimatists used a mechanical odometer similar to

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the one described by these engineers and authors, they would

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have been using some kind of earlier device similar to

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Heroes or Vitruvious. Is not something that hero or Vitruvious

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and vented. Now. An interesting source I found on on

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>these two device descriptions is a book called Technical Exprassis

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in Greek and Roman Science and Literature, The Written Machine

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>between Alexandria and Rome. This is by an author named

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Courtney Roby from Cambridge University Press. Courtney Roby is a

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>professor of classics at Cornell and in this book, this

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>is in the context of explaining patterns of composition in

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Greek and Roman technical books, how in different times and

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>cultures there were different standards and uses for technical explanation

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of machinery. Hero and Vitruvius both wrote books describing odometers.

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Heroes, but the the earlier mentioned by Vitruvius

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>comes in a book called on Architecture, and according to Roby,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Vitruvius himself acknowledges that the odometer is quote part of

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a technological tradition handed down from predecessors. Some authors have

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested that might mean from Archimedes, but I'm not aware

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of what what evidence there would be for this, so

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how strong that suggestion is. Maybe it's

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like, oh, Archimedes, he invented stuff, and

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's him. Yeah, I think some sometimes we see

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in different traditions we have these these noted inventors, noted minds,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of become mythic magnets for various ideas

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and inventions. But there might be some good reasons for

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>think of our comedies. I just don't know if there is.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I did not turn it up than the basic principle,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>how does this odometer work? So you've got a chariot wheel.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Odometer typically has a wheel of some kind that is

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>rolling on the ground and that's your your basic point

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of contact with the Earth to get the the baseline

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>measurement of distance. So you've got a chariot wheel of

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a fixed size two Roman feet in radius, which Vitruvius

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>says h gives the wheel a circumference of approximately twelve

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>point five Roman feet. So if the radius is two,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's four times pie, which is about twelve point five six.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So when Vitrivius has twelve point five Roman feet, he's

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of approximating in his explanation. But anyway, each time

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the chariot wheel makes a full revolution, it will advance

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a cog wheel by one cog position, you know, one

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>tooth advances and the cog has the cog wheel has

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a fixed number of teeth, meaning that it will make

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a full revolution once the wheel has traveled one Roman mile.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Every time this cog wheel makes a full revolution, it

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>will advance a gear that pushes a single small object

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like a pebble or a bead into a receptacle. And

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>then at the end of the journey, you simply have

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a human count up the beans, you know, count up

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever the little pebbles or beads or beans are to

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know how many miles you've gone. And I want to

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>make a note that this seemed interesting to me, that

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the principle of using a system of gears

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as a type of analog computer, similar to the use

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of gears in the ancient astronomical computer known as the

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Antikithera mechanism. We discussed this in an episode we did

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the past couple of years. It might have

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>been in the Creature of the Gear episode about biological gears.

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that we often think of a gear

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that creates mechanical advantage, and it certainly does

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, but a gear can also manage ratios between numbers,

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like a gear can do math for you, and that's

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing in the case of this odometer. Yeah,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I love these these examples of them from the ancient

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>birth of the odometer or possible birth of the odometer,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and some of these these instances, because it seems it's's

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like we have the wheel turning on the road,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it's a question of could we put that

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>wheel to use, Like the wheel is already in a

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>sense marking the distance in its revolution, and and in

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's kind of like the heavens. It's like the sun.

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like the moon, it's like the the cyclical movements

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all around us that mark the passage of time. Yeah,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you just need to correlate something with like a fixed

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>number of teeth that you can count to those pre

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>existing revolutions, and then you take those teeth to do

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>some kind of work that will help you keep the count,

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like dropping a bean in a bucket, or advancing a

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>dial to on a fixed face that has a number

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>printed on it. Yeah, and it and it. You can

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>imagine that into the in the ancent minds like you

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would have realized if we could harness this, like this

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is better than than than counting your steps. There's a

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>regularity to this that would be harder to achieve through

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>other means. Totally so so. Vitruvius describes a machine roughly

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like that. Hero later describes a similar machine, but there

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>are some interesting differences in how the two authors present

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>their explication. For example, Vitruvius describes his dodometer with fixed dimensions.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The wheel is four Roman feet in diameter, the circumference

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>is approximately twelve point five feet, and so forth. And

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>here I want to read a passage from Roby quote.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Rather than providing a mathematical formula whereby the odometer could

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be adapted to any desirable or available wheel size, as

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Hero does for his own description of an odometer, Vitruvious

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>avoids formulas and geometrical language by specifying the wheel diameter

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and circumference as fixed numbers. That is to say, the

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>version of the odometer he gives his reader is presented

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>as the exact device transmitted from his quote predecessors, not

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a jumping off point for experimentation with the type of device.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>And she goes on to explain this as typical of

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference between Latin language technical literature from this period

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and Hellenistic technical literature. Works in Latin tended to be

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>exact descriptions of existing devices rather than demonstrations of principles

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and scalable instructions for building new machines. Uh the ladder

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the scalable instructions and explication of principles

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>is more like what Hero of Alexandria presents. Instead of

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>having fixed dimensions, his explanation is about how to apply

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the idea of an odometer to different scales and uses.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>With the numerical figures being ratios rather than measurements. So

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Hero's goal was to represent these relationships between the different

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sizes of the wheels and the connected gears, and then

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to read one final passage from Robi quote. Heroes description

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>allows mechanical flexibility as well. He suggests how to extend

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the number of cogs in the odometer, which can radically

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>enhance its measuring capacity. On the other hand, he notes

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that it is pointless to make an odometer that measures

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a greater distance than its vehicle could cover in a

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>single day, as it is easiest to just start the

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>count over each warning, which I lay. That's very practical,

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but it also it flags an interesting difference here. They're

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just different assumptions about the reader uh the text. In

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a more Hellenistic tradition, or as as Hero does, it

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>might be geared more toward a select audience of highly

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>educated polymaths who would be expected to take the engineering

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>principle and then vary it to their needs, whereas the

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Latin Roman tradition is describing an exact device in a

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>more accessible way that's easy to replicate but offers less

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>deep understanding and flexibility. But I wanted to come back

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to a kind of a lingering question about Alexander's bematists,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>whether they used a mechanical odometer or not. And the

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>question is which is actually more accurate. You might assume

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical odometer is more accurate, but I've read some

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>arguments that actually human pacers would be less prone to

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>error over a long distance than a primitive mechanical device

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>would be. Now, obviously the best possible scenario would be

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like to have the odometer on a modern car. You know,

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>something that is highly accurate, very well calibrated, a highly

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>accurate modern device, uh, that that's going to give you

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the best reading. But obviously something built in the fourth

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>century b c. Would have significant enough inaccuracy and its

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>measurements that this would cause problems over great distances. And

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>so the idea is that any inaccurate measurement in a

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>mechanical device would just build up and up over many,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>many miles on a great journey, Like if the circumference

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of your wheel is slightly too long over thousands of miles,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it will start to significantly underestimate the distance traveled. Meanwhile,

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the idea at least is that human biobmtists

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>literally counting their steps will also have inaccuracy, maybe inaccuracy

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>relative to some reference length of a single pace, but

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that inaccuracy will go both ways. Steps that are too

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>long and then steps that are too short, and those

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>will average out over time. That's the argument at least,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and I see the logic here, and I admit that

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not a genius at statistics, so I could

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be wrong. But my reaction is that I think this

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>could also be mistaken because it would tend to assume

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that the human pacers inaccuracy will not be consistently biased

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>either above or below whatever the reference past length being

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>used is. Uh So, I think this logic might work

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if you had like a group of a thousand people walking,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you had all of them count their steps,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you averaged all of those together. But if

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it was just a single person, I would tend to

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think that their personal count might be biased more in

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one direction or another. They would just tend to have

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>longer than average or shorter than average steps, and that

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>even a pretty primitive machine would be better. But I

0:27:54.520 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's fascinating, Yeah, I don't. I don't know

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what to make it because yeah, I can. I can

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>see what they're getting at with the idea that some

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of a basic mechanical flaw in an ancient odometer

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>device that you would just consistently get the wrong number,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and then that would build up over time, and then yeah,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>when when it comes to the actual steps and the

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>counting of those steps by an individual or individuals, you'd have,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little, a little in one direction, a

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>little another direction, but it would sort of even out. Yeah,

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fascinating to think about. I mean, I think

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be more likely to even out if you

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a group of people, like a large

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>group of people all average together. Yeah, I don't know

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if that'd be the case for a single person anyway,

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they were using mechanical odometers, ancient dematists

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>did a not at all bad job of measuring different

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>distances between milestones between cities, and it's possible they were

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>helped in this task by devices like the ones described

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>by Vitruvious and Hero. But ultimately, I think we don't

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>know for sure if they use these devices or not,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and if they did, we don't know for sure who

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>invented these ancient odometers. It's it's one of those questions.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are many inventions where we just don't

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>know where they came from. I wonder too if it

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>might have been a situation where they use both where

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>where their specialist in their field. So perhaps, like specialists

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in other fields, they're using more than one method and

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>then comparing the numbers and figuring out some sort of

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more accurate measurement based on the two. Yeah, that could be.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. But anyway, it's really impressive that in

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the what it's like the third or fourth century b c.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got people getting like really accurate estimates of of

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>travel distances that are on the order of hundreds of miles. Yeah,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. Now, all of this is going on in

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the Greco Roman world, but as we've partially alluded to already,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's also a history of the odometer in Chinese

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>civilization as well. In particular, the device in question is

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lee recording drum carriage. Now, this is sometimes attributed

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>as an invention of Zongheng, who lived at seventy eight

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>through one c E. This is a Chinese polymath and

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>court astronomer in the Eastern Han dynasty. Uh. This is

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an individual we've talked about before because there are a

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>number of different inventions that are attributed to him, one

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of which was an early form of earthquake detection device. Uh.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He had an important role tending calendars and celestial events,

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>aiding the Emperor Um, who of course ruled at the

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>mandate of Heaven, so, you know, maintaining the balance between

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cosmos and civil life. And this is a period of

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>time that sometimes referred to as the Golden Age of

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese history, for centuries of economic prosperity, that's all the

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>traffic of goods and ideas across the Silk Road. He

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>was an inventor, a poe it in an Early Scientist.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We have an older invention episode about the earthquake detection device.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And I was looking back at some of our notes

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm reminded that that you shared some of his

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>poetry in that episode. Oh I don't remember that now.

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Was it good poetry? Oh? Yeah, yeah, that's good stuff. Um.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So he's credited with a number of inventions, innovations, and achievements.

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a treatise on the Mystical Laws of the Cosmos,

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which included the theory that the moon did not emit light,

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but reflected the light of the sun. And he's also

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes attributed as the inventor of the Lee recording drum carriage,

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>which again is this um uh, this this odometer of

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts in Chinese history. Now it is worth noting that

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of like the situation with Hero and Archimedes,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a very famous historical inventor here, and he's

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>attributed with a number of inventions. And so I guess

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the question always lingers, is this an invention that this

0:31:55.440 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>individual invented? Is it something that they described it something?

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it's something that just ends up being attributed to

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>them because the technology was known during that time, or

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's based on surviving records, etcetera. Yeah, exactly. So I

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ended up looking at some of the writings of Joseph

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>need Him on this. So Needham lived. He was a

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>British biochemist, historian of science and sinologists who wrote rather

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>extensively on the history of science and technology in China.

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>His second wife, lu gives him was a Chinese historian

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and biochemist, and she was an important co researcher and

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>co author in his work. So we're talking multiple volumes

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that he wrote during his lifetime, very very much his

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>life work. So before we get to the carriage itself,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought we might stop to just consider Rhodes in

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>ancient China. So Needham writes about Rhodes in general in

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the short Science and Civilization in China, and he points

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>out that they were quite comparable to the famous roads

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Romans. Both empires had extensive road systems that

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>served as a means of logistically connecting their vast land

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>holdings for travel and trade as well as you know,

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>playing an important part is just in just communication through

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the empire. That's always something to keep in mind, uh,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that the road is also a lane for communication. Now,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>both systems, the Roman and the Chinese, fell into long

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>periods of decay after the third century see he points out,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>though he writes that while the collapse of Roman roads

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>had more of a fracturing effect in China, natural and

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>artificial waterways and some surviving mountain road systems enabled these

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>far reaching routes of communication to remain open. He also

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>points out something very interesting about these two independent systems,

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's this rather on inspiring and I thought really

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>nicely written. And it also kind of ties into some

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff we talked about in our previous episode

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Roman military that the Dethrone Emperor series quote.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Should the Romans have ever succeeded in conquering the Parthians

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Persians, the two road systems might have met,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps somewhere west of shin Jiang, but this was not

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to be. The octopus like arms expanded independently, each in

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a world of its own, their builders, troubled only occasionally

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>by the vaguest rumors of another system too far away

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to matter. It's in John, by the way, is in

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>northwest China. That's where he's talking about here. So, yeah,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this is such a I love this quote because it's

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>just a imagining these two independent road systems, like like

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like octopuses, Uh, each doing their own thing. And if

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, world history had gone a different way, there

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been a situation where they met. Uh. It's

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy to think about, like like roads, I've often

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thought about. You know, you encounter a road and where

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>does that road end? You know that basically goes It's

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>not infinite, but uh, you can it stretches on for

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>such a great distance. And to imagine these two vast

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>systems um almost but not quite coming together. Yeah, it's

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I don't know if if you've ever

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>played around with this to to see like how far

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one can drive on a given continent or on connected continents,

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Like at what point do things seem to break down

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and you would have to find some other route to

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>connect with another road? And I know when you get

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>into Eurasia and Africa, like there are some pretty long

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>travels by road that are that are possible today. The

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.479
<v Speaker 1>road is not going to be necessarily to be great

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole way, but you can do quite a lot

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>thank so. Anyway, Needham points out that with the odometer

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or the way measure, it's it's a pretty simple proposition

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from a mechanical standpoint. If you have the wheel already,

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and you have row, and you have if you have roads,

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you have wheels, then all it is is quote a

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>system of toothed wheels constituting a reduction gear train so

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that one or more pins revolved slowly, releasing catches at

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>predetermined intervals, and in the case of this invention, striking

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>drums or gongs, so the lee recording drum carriage. What

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is Alie Alie is the traditional Chinese measure of distance today,

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>standardized at five meters or one thousand sixty feet, but

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as with a mile and Western traditions, historically there's some

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>drift over exactly how far it is supposed to be.

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's standardized today and would have been standardized under

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>different rules and different dynasties. Yes, standardization of measures does

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>seem like such an important part of this too, because

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I when I kept thinking about the idea of of

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a bimitist potentially trying to measure distance with paces, I'm like,

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what is So You've got to have something that's like

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a reference pace, right, If you say something is x

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.479
<v Speaker 1>number of paces long, you've got to either know how

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>much your pace typically relates to a standard measure like

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a mile, or you've got to be using your paces

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>as some kind of literal standard measure, like people would

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>know what that number meant. Yeah, yeah, it's yeah. The

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the history of of measurements alone would be something interesting

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to come back to, because, of course you get into

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>use of various parts of the human body uh to

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to form your base measurements, UH, the creation of tools

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and UH and certainly when you're getting into weights for

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>goods and trade, like some of our oldest data and

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>oldest examples are all related to that. But then when

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking about these larger measurements, like the measurement

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>between you know, the fourth in the frontier, that sort

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing, like you like, you can't just count, You

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>can't just have someone go out there with essentially a

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ruler and say all right, start measuring it off, like

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta have some other system. Yeah, yeah, alright, So

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Needa gets more into into the subject of the lea

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Lee measuring art here in Science and Civilization in China,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Volume for Physics and Physical Technology, Part two, Mechanical Engineering, Um,

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it gets into the nature and origins of

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lee recording drum carriage. He cites several sources and

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>post in some of these resources that go into more detail.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Others just kind of mentioned it in passing and points

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>out that that many of the mentions of the carriage, yeah,

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't actually describe the mechanism employed. In at least

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one case, it shows up as a math problem. It's

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's something along the lines of if the Lee recording

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>drum carriage were to travel between this city and this city,

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>how many times would the gong u sound that sort

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing. The concept seems to date back to the

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Hun dynasty, and this is where the attribution to zong

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Hang seems to come into play. But when the carriage

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is described, it's generally described as a carriage drawn by

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>four horses, and it works based on multiple cogged wheels,

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some vertical and some horizontal, you know, all of course,

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>much like the earlier example in the Greco Roman traditions

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing, you know, it's tied to the movement

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of the wheels. In the simpler version of this um

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of this carriage, it's said that there is a wooden

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>man in the carriage who is mechanically made to strike

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a drum with the passage of each lee. So the

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>wheels are turning, the cogs are turning, there's a mechanical

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>wooden man inside who like like a music box, he

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to mechanically strike a drum in this case,

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>every time one lee has passed. Beat that vitruvious. You

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>did not have a wooden man, did you. Later, a

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 1>more complex version is described as being two stories in heights,

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So so it's a carriage that has two stories and

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>each story has its own wooden figure. The lower figure

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 1>strikes a drum every lee, while the higher figure rings

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a bell every ten le Okay, So one difference that

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>occurs to me here is this would still if it's

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping track of the distance in an accurate way, but

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>doing so by making a sound instead of by say,

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>accumulating uh, pebbles or beads in a container. It's something

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>that you would to some extent need to continuously keep

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>track of as you're traveling, Like it would still require

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>effortful engagement of the memory by somebody doing the traveling, right,

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's based on my reading here of need him.

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any indication that it was spitting

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>out like you know, balls or or or or pebbles

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that could then be counted later, or there was anyway

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>recording how many leaves it passed. It was just a

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ringing of a bell or the striking

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of a drum based on the intervals traveled, which would

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>still be useful, but would require more work than or

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at least work spread out over a longer period of time,

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than say like a single counting activity in between

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>travel segments. And in this we get into one of

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the big questions about the Lee recording drum carriage, and

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that is was this a device that was at all

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>originally intended to measure distances? Or was it you? Or

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>was it more about music? Was it more about novelty?

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Was it was it? Why was the technology employed? So

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>again this was this? These writings are typically revolving around

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Han period or perhaps a little earlier, but the

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Lee measuring drum carriage was not known as such until later,

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and need Him discusses that this might mean that the

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>invention was in fact more expressly for musical performance rather

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 1>than the measurement of distances. Again, at least during this

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 1>time period. It may have may have changed later when

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>someone realized, oh yeah, we can just count how many

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>strikes of the drum, we can count how many rings

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bell, and then that's data that could prove useful.

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But he stresses that you know, these are still interconnected,

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>interconnected possibilities, um. And if you're if you're asking, well,

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>why would they do that, like why build a carriage

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>like this? And why does it remain something other than

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just like a one time novelty, Like why is it

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>written about so much? And he points out that music,

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, is often part of a procession, and he

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>stresses that quote carriages for musicians, whether mechanized or not,

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>survived in imperial processions through many subsequent dynasties. So the

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that the mechanical version uh here develops

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>from non mechanical carriages with human musicians inside them. Imperial

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fleets of vehicles, as he refers to them, would have

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>likely included palace officials and so forth, but also entertainers musicians.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>So as everyone's traveling down the road, there's music, and

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point someone says, hey, what we could We

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>could build some gears. We could make a mechanical musical

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>man inside one of the carriages, putting those flesh musicians

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>out of the job. Well, I don't know if they've

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>become cletely out of the job, because you know that

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>these these mechanical musicians can only do so much here.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, for for a modern comparison, we might

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think of of a parade float as a as a

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>counterpart is something like this. It does sound a lot

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like a parade float. It would have been, according to

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one account, painted red and decorated with flowers, and birds it.

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's described as being escorted by eighteen men. Uh, and

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>there would have been a phoenix headed carriage pole on it.

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So this was not clearly not something that was like

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a Google Maps vehicle that was out there just to

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>perform a task. It Also it said that it looked marvelous.

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a joyous vehicle. And once more, Needham stresses that

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for sure if it was ever used

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>by cartographers. Uh. It's possible that that later on photographers

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>may make use of the data that could be provided

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>by this, but we're not sure. Interesting, so Needham points

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out that heroes description of the podometer did not claim

0:43:56.760 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it as a new invention. He mentions the truvious and

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>then mentions that after hero Vitruvius, the odometer appears in

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe during the fifteenth century, so it's it's kind

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of not really on the Western European radar for a

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>long period of time, or doesn't seem to be based

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on surviving histories, and then it re emerges. Quote. The

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>pattern is therefore the same as that which we have

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly met with i e. Greek antecedents paralleled or followed

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>by followed at short distance by Chinese developments which continue

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>throughout the medieval period, and then a reawakening of the

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>subject in Europe. So in this he's touching on something

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of a career spanning question for him.

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Is often referred to as the need Him question, and

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that the question is basically why didn't China beat Europe

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to the scientific revolution. He's been a fair amount of

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>his work thinking over this and looking to answers and

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese social institutions and more. Uh though, as as of reading,

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the psychologist Nathan Siven, who would have been I think

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at times of liberator with Needham, pointed out that, you know,

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is basically a why did an X happen?

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>In history question, which by some estimates is less than

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 1>a fruitful enterprise. You know, you get into all sorts

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of complex butterfly wing flapping concerns when you start asking

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>questions like that. They can be kind of nifty head scratchers,

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps they are not the best exercise for an historian.

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, the Needham question, you see it

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a lot in discussions of of the history of

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese science. Now, I do want to note in reading

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about all this I also read as some material for

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>needum about another interesting wheeled vehicle in Chinese history, and

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that is the south pointing chariot. But that's one we're

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to come back to. But yeah, the idea

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of a chariot with another mechanical man on it, but

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>this mechanical man always points south omous. Okay. So we're

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna We're not gonna go through the exhaustive history

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of the of the odometer in in recent centuries, but

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought it might be useful to point out a

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>few different later innovations that kind of bring us up

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to the modern odometer. Um, there's Pascal's calculator. This would

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>have been an invention or an innovation by Blaze Pascal. Uh.

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>This was five not an adometer per se, But it

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>was a computation mechanism that entailed rotating toothed gears, and

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>much like a modern odometer, one complete cycle of one

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>gear caused the movement of the next gear. Okay, So

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this would have been taking the same principle by which

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the ancient odometer worked, but applying it to general calculation

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than just the movement of a vehicle wheel. Right now,

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the late sixteen early seventeen hundreds, we also see

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Savory's nautical odometer. Uh. Savories most famous invention was

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the steam engine, but he also devised a nautical adometer.

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually couldn't find out much about this, so I

0:46:58.239 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm gonna have to come back to this

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>one in a few sure, but because I was curious

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on how exactly it would have functioned. Interesting. Yeah, supposedly

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a patent, so it seems like I should

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to find that patent somewhere. So I don't know,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I have to come back to that one. But this

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is a fun part because our old friend Ben Franklin

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>also enters the fray here when it comes to the odometer.

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>He's come up in more than one invention conversation, I believe.

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So what what was his take? So? In seventy five

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he was serving as Postmaster General for the British. Previously

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he had been postmaster of Philadelphia, and he wanted more

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>data on the shortest routes for mail delivery. So he

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>basically devised a simple odometer to attach to his own carriage.

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And UH, and this will for this reason you'll sometimes

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>see especially some online sources saying Ben Franklin invented the odometer. No,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not accurate in the least to say Ben Franklin

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.760
<v Speaker 1>invented the odometer. You could say he invented on odometer.

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>He certainly would one up on the fly here. It

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.919
<v Speaker 1>seems so every four revolutions it would register a mile

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and the results were apparently pretty accurate based on what

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I was reading here. So at any rate, he was

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>able to to to use the data, uh, to figure

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out which route was best for male delivery. Now, one

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I know I saw reference to on the internet

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't know what to make of this was

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the idea of a Mormon odometer. Yeah, this was one that, Yeah,

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that came up for me as well. The rhodometer from

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Clayton and Pratt. Uh. This would have been eighteen forty seven.

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They were pioneers of the Church of Jesus Christ of

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Latter day Saints and they apparently crafted a simple odometer

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to measure how far a wagon train had traveled. Um.

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So that's it's interesting again. It's we're getting into this

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>area where it sounds like people would find themselves in

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>situations where they could really use an odometer, and since

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge was was known, you could create one. You

0:48:57.840 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>couldn't go to the store and buy one, but the

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>principles route there. The principles were part of of of

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of the technological canon, so you could draw on that

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and make yourself a functional odometer. In e Curtis age

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Vter came up with a bicycle mounted odometer, the cyclometer,

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and then in three we have the Warner autometer, which

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, like the advertised versions of this, this was

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like an actual product. It was a combined odometer, spedometer,

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and clock, but it made use of magnetism as opposed

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to just pure gear work. Uh So, like those are

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the big more big innovations in the odometer

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in recent centuries. And uh yeah, today the odometer again

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is something we tend to just take for granted or

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't even read it. It just sort of clicks

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>by there and maybe we check in on it every

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you know. However, many thousands of miles, I guess at

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>vary some people were probably more more into keeping a

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>close eye in their odometer, or you have to for

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>work obviously. I think about seeing those surveyors who have

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the wheel they use the surveyors the surveyor's wheel. Of course,

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think about that. That that's an obvious um

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>innovation to compare to some of these discussions of the odometer,

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 1>like harnessing the power of the wheel from measurement. All right, well,

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go and close it out here, but we'd

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there. Perhaps you have

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 1>particular thoughts about the odometer. It's ancient history, it's recent history,

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, our modern use of the technology

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>right in we would love to hear from you. As

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a reminder, our core episodes of Stuff to Blow Your

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Mind publish on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and the Stuff to

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind podcast feed on Monday's we do listener mail,

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday's we do a short form artifact or monster fact,

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and on Friday's we do Weird How Cinema. That's our

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:43.879
<v Speaker 1>time to set aside most serious concerns and just talk

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about the strange film huge thanks to our excellent audio

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>any other, to suggest a topic for the future, or

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>at Stuff to Blow Your Mind dot com. Stuff to

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is production of I heart Radio. For

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio, this is the i

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows,