1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,280 Speaker 1: Speaking of back and forth. We are greatly valued by 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:08,280 Speaker 1: the perspective of Arthur Levitt, the former chairman of the SEC. 3 00:00:09,039 --> 00:00:12,800 Speaker 1: But I would suggest that Chairman Levitt brings not a 4 00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: bias but his view Rob Trick and Elly does not. 5 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,599 Speaker 1: He is cut throat and being fair and balanced and 6 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: looking at SEC changes. Rob Trick and Elly, let me 7 00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 1: cut to the chase for Global Wall Street. Is it 8 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:35,120 Speaker 1: thumb up or thumb down on new SEC legislation? Wow, 9 00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,320 Speaker 1: that's you cutting right to the chase. Yeah, I would say, uh, 10 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 1: I mean probably thumbed down because none of it's going 11 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:44,839 Speaker 1: to become law. I mean really, there's a bunch of 12 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:47,000 Speaker 1: bills just came out of the House committee that handles 13 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,839 Speaker 1: this um. Some of it is Republican messaging, something that 14 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:54,840 Speaker 1: is small tweaks to the financial laws that uh that 15 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 1: they've been pushing that kind of thing for a while. 16 00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 1: But you know, you, it's hard to say if any 17 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:02,000 Speaker 1: of it's going anywhere. You have been doing this for 18 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: for a long time. Is the lobbying effort of Wall 19 00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:09,600 Speaker 1: Street different now than it was three or four years ago, 20 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: or particularly two thousand and six. Is there a different 21 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,120 Speaker 1: ballet in your Washington you're with Bloomberg b NA. So 22 00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:19,440 Speaker 1: you just see this all the time. The canopies changed 23 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 1: at the St. Regis Hotel. Uh, you do see a 24 00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,200 Speaker 1: little bit of an effort just because even the term 25 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 1: Wall Street is something that lawmakers kind of run away 26 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 1: from with this political climate. And it seems even on 27 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 1: kind of both sides of the aisle of some extent. Uh, 28 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:42,399 Speaker 1: the you know, the largest banks and these bigger institutions 29 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: are are just um are a little bit more radioactive 30 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:47,560 Speaker 1: in a way that they weren't even and even just 31 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,280 Speaker 1: a few years ago. What is the piece of legislation 32 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:52,680 Speaker 1: of the House And you're saying it's not going to 33 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,360 Speaker 1: get through. I don't need to memorize it over the weekend. 34 00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 1: I mean, I get that, But what's a single interesting 35 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 1: and valuables for our listeners. I think the new thing 36 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 1: we've seen UM this past week was dealing with proxy 37 00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:14,079 Speaker 1: advisory firms UM, which you know, give proxy shareholders advice 38 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 1: on voting on certain shareholder initiatives. UM. House Republicans now 39 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 1: pushing an effort that would make those firms have to 40 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 1: register with the SEC and subject them to new conduct standards. 41 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:26,440 Speaker 1: And that's that's kind of a new thing. We haven't 42 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:30,320 Speaker 1: really seen that um out of the chamber yet. And 43 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,480 Speaker 1: the bill went through committee with some Democratic support, but 44 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:35,799 Speaker 1: you do have some on the left saning it's just 45 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:41,640 Speaker 1: another attempt to hamstring shareholder proposals. Where are we on 46 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:45,639 Speaker 1: the budget for the SEC? Know, Arthur Levitt clearly as 47 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:49,359 Speaker 1: an angle there that they're under budgeted and understaffed. Does 48 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 1: anybody down there push against former chairman Levitt? Uh? Yeah, 49 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 1: I mean the the House House Republicans want to cut 50 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: the Agent sees budget by fifty million dollars from what 51 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 1: was enacted for this year. Um, and Senate Republicans have 52 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 1: kept it flat. But you hear um from the left 53 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:13,040 Speaker 1: and from the agency that even the current level isn't enough. 54 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:15,679 Speaker 1: The White House wanted a just for you know, to 55 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 1: put some numbers ont of this. They get one point 56 00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:21,840 Speaker 1: six billion for the current fiscal year, and the White 57 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: House and the Agency asked for almost a two million 58 00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:28,760 Speaker 1: dollar increase. You know, they want more exams of investment advisors. UM, 59 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:33,559 Speaker 1: they want more I T upgrades, more enforcement staff and UM, 60 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 1: you know Republicans are are balking at that. And um, 61 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:38,960 Speaker 1: you know there are two different versions of a spending 62 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 1: bill out in Congress right now, one keeps it flat, 63 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:43,920 Speaker 1: one with a slight cut that will probably get resolved 64 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 1: going forward, maybe split down the middle. But um, you 65 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: know it is it's either going to be flat or cut. 66 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 1: It looks like, yeah, I I look at this in 67 00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 1: the bell. I just you know, very quickly, here is 68 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: the SEC short of staff. I mean, I'm always fascinated 69 00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:01,640 Speaker 1: by pe boll that going. They worked there not for 70 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 1: a cup of coffee with respect. They work hard and 71 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: for a long time, but the then go right on 72 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: to the next job within the revolving door of the SEC. 73 00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:12,600 Speaker 1: Are they short of warm bodies? I think so. You 74 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 1: just look at how far behind they are in their 75 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 1: rulemaking mandates, um, and just even the fact that they 76 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,040 Speaker 1: don't they have it's a five member commission with only 77 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:23,320 Speaker 1: three commissioners right now. They're they're they're short both at 78 00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:26,040 Speaker 1: the commissioner or the political level and at the end 79 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 1: at the staff level. Thank you so much? Is it 80 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:30,600 Speaker 1: really really nice update? I learned a let there. Mark 81 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 1: Rob trick an Elli rather with Bloomberg b n A 82 00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:37,120 Speaker 1: with his work on the update on the SEC. You know, 83 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 1: he says, I got right to the point I think 84 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 1: you have to do that folks with legislation because so 85 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 1: much is analysis of it. And all I want to 86 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:48,000 Speaker 1: know is does it have a chance of getting through 87 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:52,599 Speaker 1: and using the cases? Uh? Maybe not. Rob Trick CONNELLI 88 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:53,520 Speaker 1: with Bloomberg BNA