WEBVTT - Ep130 "What do brains tell us about politics?" Part 1: Polarization

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>What does political polarization have to do with the brain.

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>How does an understanding of the medial prefrontal cortex tell

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us about what propaganda posters have in common across nation

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and time. What does any of this have to do

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Civil War or hippies versus soldiers, or border

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ruffians versus free staters or barbarians, or hanging chads or

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>pearl harbor, or the shadows side of oxytocin, And why

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>education can serve as an immune response to mind viruses.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist and author at Stanford and in these episodes we

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>sail deeply into our three pound universe to understand why

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and how our lives look the way they do. Today's

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>episode is one of a couple I'm making on the

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>topic of neuropolitics. We are in a polarized era, and

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>when I look around, I see a primate brain doing

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of things that primate brains do. So today I'm

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about polarization, and in the next episode,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about all the good news, which

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is the flexibility of the brain and what hopes we

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>might have to get ourselves out of polarization. I'm also

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>going to do another episode about all the other aspects

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger picture that I'm calling neuropolitics, which is

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that the circuitry of our brains leads us

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of political viewpoints we have, and why

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we often have a difficult time understanding one another and

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>why societies fracture along particular lines. Okay, so when I

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think about America, the polarization is high, and this feeling

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we all have is of course easily quantified. As one example,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the numbers about how many times

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you have congressmen voting across the aisle. When a society

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is very polarized, like it is now, people hold on

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tight to their team. I'm very interested in viewing this

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all from the perspective of the brain, but first I

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>need to do some table setting. A lot of people

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>assert that our polarization has everything to do with social media.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in the roles that social media plays, but

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I do need to say that I don't think it

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>serves by itself as much of an explanation for our polarization. Why,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>because we've been exactly this polarized many many times before,

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all before the Internet was even a twinkle in anybody's eyes. So,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, America in the late nineteen sixties was very polarized.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This was easily seen on the streets, in living rooms,

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on television screens. The Vietnam War split the nation. You

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>had young people marching against it, while others saw opposition

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as unpatriotic and dangerous. The Civil rights movement was reshaping

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>laws and culture, and that was going too fast for

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>some and too slow for others. Generational divides ran deep.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Parents who had lived through World War Two and fought

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in it struggled to understand their children's embrace of counterculture

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and long hair and psychedelic music and radical politics. The

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>assassinations of Martin Luther King and Senator Robert F. Kennedy,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the urban riots, what happened Kent State. All of these

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>moments reinforced the sense that Americans were not living in

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one shared country, but in different realities. Trust in government

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>plummeted with Watergate in the nineteen seventies, and that further

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hardened the feeling that institutions could no longer be trusted.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a time when the nation's social fabrics seemed

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to be tearing and when, much like today, people questioned

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>whether their neighbors were even living in the same world

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that they were. And of course that was just one

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of many polarized eras in this country. The most obvious

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>one began in the eighteen forties and led to the

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Civil War. The divide over slavery and states rights sharpened

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>decade by decade, inflamed by the Missouri Compromised, the Kansas

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska Act, the dread Scott decision. You can see the

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>way that newspapers and churches and politicians increasingly spoke in

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutist terms, and by the way violence erupted well before

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the war did. From eighteen fifty four to fifty nine

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Kansas territory, you had pro slavery border Ruffians

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and the anti slavery free Staters, and they would make

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>raids back and forth, committing assaults and murders, each retaliating

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>for the last. There were at least fifty six political

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>killings during that time, and by the next year, eighteen sixty,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the election of Abraham Lincoln prompted Southern states to secede

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and Civil War followed. Okay, so that was a really

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>grim outcome with seven hundred thousand people killed. But there

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>have been many, many other periods of polarization that somehow

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>had their day, and then the temperature went down without

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>war for different reasons, and we're going to dive into

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that next week. For example, in the eighteen seventies, a

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>decade after the Civil War, polarization grew again around rapid industrialization.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You had labor strikes and violent clashes like the Haymarket

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>riot and the Pullman strike. You had class resentment between

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>robber barons and workers. And what you can see then

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as now is that newspapers and politicians portrayed opponents as

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>existential threats to the American way of life. Then in

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen tens and twenties, polarization happened again. World War

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I and its aftermath split Americans over issues of free

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>speech and loyalty and communism. The first Red Scare was

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned about anarchists and labor organizers who were depicted as

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>dangerous reds. There were mass arrests and deportations, and this

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>deepened divides, and simultaneously there was a surgeon racial violence.

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>The summer of nineteen nineteen saw dozens of race riots

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and the rise of the Second Ku Klux Klan, which

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>polarized communities along racial and religious and immigrant lines. Then

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Late Night Seen twenties and nineteen thirties, you

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>had the Great Depression, the economic collapse that sparked really

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fierce battles over the role of government. FDR's New Deal

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>was hailed as salvation by some and it was condemned

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>as socialism by others. Far left and far right groups

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>clashed bitterly. And it was also the case that the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>country was polarized over whether America should intervene in Europe

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as fascism rose, until the attack on Pearl Harbor, which

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>temporarily united public opinion. Okay, then I already mentioned the

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>polarization of the civil rights movement Vietnam era. So let's

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>jump to the culture wars of the nineteen eighties and nineties.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Some of you might even recall the Reagan era, where

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the country saw sharp divides over taxation and welfare, and

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>abortion and feminism and gay rights. These were the so

0:07:54.000 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>called culture wars, which pitted conservatives and evangelicals against progressives

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in battles over school curricula and art and family values.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And again you could measure this with polarization in Congress

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>steadily growing. Finally, some of you may even remember the

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>contested two thousand election of Bush versus Gore. Again, this

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was still pre social media, and the whole race came

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>down to just the state of Florida, where Bush seemed

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to lead by a few hundred votes out of six

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.119
<v Speaker 1>million cast there, and officials tried to figure out voter

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>intent involving hanging chads, which were in completely punched paper ballots,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and pregnant chads, which were paper ballots that were dimpled. Anyway,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this spun all the way up to the Supreme Court,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>who finally ruled the electoral vote in favor of Bush,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>even though Gore had received five hundred thousand more popular

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>votes nationwide. Now, not all my listeners were alive or

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>watching the news at that time, but boy, that was

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a really highly polarized time as well. Then you had

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven, which brought the nation together. But then

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>over some years the Iraq War started to sharpen those

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>divides again. Now you might be tempted to say, well,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's worse than ever now because of social media filter bubbles,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to remind us all that echo

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>chambers are the oldest story of humankind. We are more

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with people who agree with us and see the

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>world from our angle now. I often hear people say

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>things like, yes, but we only had a few news

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sources back in the day, so everyone was pinned to

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the same truth. Walter Kronkite or whoever. This is a

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>seductive idea, but it's not true. People got some of

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>their info from Kronkite, but also from the newsletters they

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to in their physical mailbox, and also from all

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>their friends and neighbors and co workers. And when people

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>would have dinners together or chat in the breakroom or

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>drink beers in their backyard with their friends, that's when

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they would really come to consensus agreement about what was

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>happening in the world. Just to jump back to the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam era, do you think the hippies and the returning

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>soldiers were sitting down and watching Walter Cronkite and saying, ah, okay,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I see the truth. There's no problem. We all agree now.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>So any reading of history shows that polarization is depressingly

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a recurring pattern. Each cycle takes a different shape, whether

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that's slavery or labor or immigration, or race or culture

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or war. But the common thread is the part I

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>want to zoom in on. When people begin to see

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>each other not as neighbors with families and mortgages and

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lives and desires for a better life, but as existential threats.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>When that happens, the brain circuitry involved in empathy, in

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>understanding another person's hopes and dreams, the activity in those

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>circuits dials down, and the social fabric begins to frame.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just want to flag a point

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to explore next week, which is that

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>most historians interested in this topic linger on how societies

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fall into polarization, but my main interest nowadays is how

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they crawl back out. So next week I'm going to

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>examine the factors that seem to pull societies back from

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the brink, because with all those eras that I just named,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we went to actual war only once, and with all

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the other periods, we managed to pull ourselves back onto

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a straight road. Sometimes this is because of external factors

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes because of internal work, And this is all

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to address next week. Okay, So now

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to return to the particular issue for today,

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>which is how our brains operate with in and out

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>groups and what the brain is capable of when it's

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pushed in the wrong direction. So let's start in nineteen

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety four in Rwanda. The radio was on in homes

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and shops and bars, and the message that pours out

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>every day is relentless. The Tutsis are cockroaches. They must

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be crushed. This was literally the language in this framework.

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>The Tutsi were not citizens or neighbors or people with

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>families and histories and memories, but they were cockroaches. The

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more often this message was repeated, the more it carved

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>itself into people's brains, and eventually the machetes got unsheathed,

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>neighbors turned on neighbors. In one hundred days, half a

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>million people were killed. And the part that is frankly

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>terrifying is that when you think about genocide, you might

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>think this gets driven by soldiers or politicians, but that's

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not what was going on here. The engine of what

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>happened in Rwanda was regular people who to neighbors who

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>had lived side by side with the Tutsi for generations.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the power of dehumanization. Once someone is no

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>longer perceived as human, the neural breaks come off. Now,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be comforting if we could view Rwanda as

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a tragic anomaly, but it's not. History gives us no

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>shortage of examples of this very same principle. In Nazi Germany,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish community was depicted in newspapers like their Sturmer,

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>as rodents swarming through sewers. They were painted as vermin

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be exterminated. And this is precisely the cognitive space

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that you need to get into if you actually want

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to murder your former friends and neighbors. And by the way,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the Hutu and the Nazis, but everyone

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>does it. So during World War Two, American propaganda posters

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>portrayed the Japanese with distorted faces and thick glasses and

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>clawed fingers crouched like apes. The caption was this is

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the enemy. And this is the same across history. If

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we step back into the world of ancient Rome, you'll

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>see that outsiders were called barbarians. The word comes from

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Greek barbaros, which was a mocking sound meant to

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>imitate the noise of foreign languages. Bar barbar Originally, it

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a negative connotation. But pretty quickly the terms

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>meaning shifted from outsider to a pejorative for being savage

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or uncivilized. And this was because to Roman ears, outsiders

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>had meaningless babbel and increasingly reviewed like animals. The Romans

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>often described enemies as wild or beasts. Julius Caesar characterized

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Galls and Germans as quote, living like animals. Tacitus

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>described the Britons as quote savages who live like beasts

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the forests. So across continents and centuries, the pattern

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is exactly the same. When societies prepare for conflict, they

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sharpen their words, and the words are designed for the

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>simple task of stripping away the humanity of the other side.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Now why does this work so well? Why are animal

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>metaphors so effective. It's because they reach down into the

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>neural machinery and turn a dial. Under normal circumstances, when

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at someone else and another person, you have

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>regions of the brain that allow you to imagine their

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>inner life. Specifically, a region behind your forehead called the

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>medial prefrontal cortex gets involved when you consider that this

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>person has thoughts and feelings and plans and fears. That's

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what lights up when you see someone else as a

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>human reaching out to deal with a bicycle or a

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>chair or a coffee machine. This area does not become active.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It's only active when you're dealing with a human, when

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you're doing what researchers call a social cognition task. But

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>some years ago, my colleagues Lasana Harris and Susan Fiske

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at Princeton wanted to see if the amount this area

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is active depends on what you think about a particular group.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So they put people in the brain scanner fMRI, and

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they showed them photographs of business people and athletes and

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the elderly, and nurses, and drug addicts and people who

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>were homeless. And here's what they found. While some pictures,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like wealthy people, triggered envy, this social region, the medial

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>prefrontal cortex was still active. Other photos, let's say a

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>very elderly people, triggered emotions of pity, and this social

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>region was still active. But when the brain looked at

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pictures and felt discussed, like for pictures of homeless people

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or drug addicts at rock bottom, the brain viewed them

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not as humans with minds, but more like objects. That

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is the humanization, your brain decides, and this is essentially

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>all subconsciously that this person does not count as another mind.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>This person is neurally speaking, less than human. And by

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm linking all the relevant studies to the

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>show notes, I encourage you to check those out. So

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>let's return to propaganda. When some group of people is

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>portrayed as cockroaches or rats or babbling animal, barbarians, or

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a virus or a robot or whatever, the social cognition

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>regions like the medial prefrontal cortex get dialed down. The

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>brain no longer treats this other group as people with

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a mind. Instead, people of that group become more like objects.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And when these circuits are not steering your decisions, violence

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes psychologically easier. As an example, unless you are a vegetarian,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't really mind murdering a big, beautiful animal like

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a cow or a bowl, because you want that burger,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and that animal is just an animal to your mind,

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a human, and so your medial prefrontal cortex

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is less active when you look at that cow, and

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so you can take a knife to its throat without

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that keeping you up at night, and that ease of killing.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it bothers you a little, but not enough to

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>stop doing it. That's what we see throughout history, over

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and over, people murdering their neighbors after a sufficient amount

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of messaging telling them that their neighbors aren't really humans.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>They are less than humans, they're more like cows or worse,

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>they carry pestilence and they're dangerous. Now, next month, I'm

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>going to have a colleague of mine on the podcast

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>who pioneered a lot of these studies, Lassana Harris, So

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll go into more detail about the prefrontal cortex then,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But for today, I just want to make it crystal

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>clear that this dehumanization is the oldest trick in the

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>playbook of propaganda. Dehumanizing another group doesn't have to be

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about making watertight arguments for convincing people with data. It

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>can simply be about bypassing reason entirely and tampering directly

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with the machinery of social cognition. It's really important to

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>understand that this is a vulnerability built into the human brain.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>When the wind blows hard enough, the flame of your

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>social empathy gets blown out. So when we look at

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Rwanda or Nazi Germany or America during wartime, we're seeing

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a basic lesson about the architecture of our own We're

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>seeing how fragile our humanizing can be and how dangerous

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it is when pundits and politicians and online influencers lay

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>their hands on the dials. Now, before I go on,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to make really clear why I'm devoting a

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of my efforts to this sort of research is

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>because I think we can solve this, at least mostly,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and part of this comes down to education as a population.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>If we can learn to recognize the tricks of the

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>trade of propaganda, that renders those tricks mostly impotent. Just

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine that all the schools in the nation spent just

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes teaching what I just told you. Then the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>next time a student see some TikTokers say oh, those

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people are like animals, or that group is a disease

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that's infecting our country, a light bulb goes on in

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>our kids' minds and they say, wait a minute, we've

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>heard that before. That kind of simple recognition is ninety

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of the game. That recognition turns all of us

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>from passive receivers into active listeners. Having knowledge about this

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>topic about how dehumanization works in the brain. Is the

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>difference between catching the contagion of hate and mounting an

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>immune response against it. So now let's turn to a

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>related issue, one which is equally important to the story,

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and again is deeply embedded in our brains, And that's

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>our predilection for in groups and outgroups. We are fundamentally

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>very tribal. We see this in so many ways, and

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it doesn't matter, like which football team you root for,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but when when it comes to politics, it carries cognitive consequences.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>You end up feeling certain that your side of the

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>political aisle generally has the right idea and the other

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>half of the nation who knows what's infected their brains.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to be crystal clear that it

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter which side of the aisle you're on, you

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>are likely to genuinely feel this about the other side,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and you'll feel like if they would only listen to

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you and stop being so misinformed or stubborn or wrongheaded,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone would fundamentally come to agree with you. Now, if

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to understand why humans divide so easily into

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in and out groups, we have to return to our brains,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in our psychologies, because long before Instagram or cable news,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or long before propaganda ministries and political campaigns, and even

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>long before there were even such things as nations, we

0:22:55.880 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>were wired for us versus them. If you picture the

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>world of our ancestors, you had small bands of maybe

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred or so hunter gatherers traveling together, depending on

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>each other for survival. These were people who shared food,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>raised children, collectively, hunted side by side, defended one another

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>when predators or rivals approached. In that world, there wasn't

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>anything abstract about belonging. To be inside the group was life.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>To be outside might mean death, so you had to

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>be sensitive to this distinction. Our brains carry this inheritance,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and we are natural born categorizers. We draw circles around

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>us with them on the outside, and once that circle

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is drawn, things inside feel safer and more trustworthy, and

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>things outside feel riskier and more dangerous. So there was

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a good experiment on this in the nineteen seventies. The

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>psychologist Henry Tefel wanted to know how little it would

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>take to spark the tribal machinery, so he brought in

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>volunteers and showed them slides of dots on a screen,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and he asked them to estimate how many dots there were. Then,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>with a straight face, Taefel divided them into two groups,

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>overestimators and underestimators, and that was it. It was just

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a label that represented a meaningless categorization. And yet right

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>away people started favoring their own side. They gave more

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>rewards to fellow overestimators or to fellow underestimators, and not

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to the other side. They rated their own group as

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more likable and more trustworthy. The thing I want you

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to note here is that there was no deep history

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or ideology here. This was just about dots on a

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>slide and more specifically belonging to one team or the other.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So the brain doesn't require a grand narrative to polarize,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't need centuries of grievance. It just needs a category.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And once the category is there, the neural machinery of

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>favoritism for your group weres to life and seeing the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>out group as fully human. That dials down. And even

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>earlier experiment on this was from nineteen fifty four. This

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was called the robbers Cave experiment. The psychologist Muzifer Sharif

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>recruited two groups of eleven year old boys and took

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>them to a summer camp in Oklahoma. Yeah, for the

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>first week, the groups didn't even know the other existed.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Each built their own identity. One group called itself the Rattlers,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the other the Eagles. They made flags, they sang songs,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they created rituals, and then once those identities had formed,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sharif brought the two groups together and set them into competition.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>There was baseball and tugawar and treasure hunts and so on,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and Sharif watched as things spiraled turned into food fights.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Food fights escalated into raids on each other's cabins. Cabin

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>raids escalated into rocks hurled across the camp, and by

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the end the hostility was so intense that the researchers

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had to physically intervene to keep the boys safe. What's

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so striking about this is how quickly it happened. These

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>were boys who had no prior grudges, no ideological differences.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>The researchers manufactured a divide out of thin air, and

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the brains tribal machinery did the rest. And I wish

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this only said something about psychology labs or summer camps,

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>but of course, we see the same story everywhere in

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>our society. So first let's take something that's not so terrible.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We see tribalism on full display every weekend in sports stadiums. Sports,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way are our culture's safe tribalism. They let

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>us channel our loyalty and hostility into arbitrary groups. So

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Yeas versus Red Sox, or Manchester United versus Liverpool,

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or Cowboys versus forty nine ers. People chant, they paint

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>their faces, they wave flags, they curse at their rivals,

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and for a few hours they experience the same surge

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of in group bonding that once held hunter gatherer bands together,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and when the game ends, most fans go home without bloodshed.

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Sports give us the thrill of us versus them in

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a contained, ritualized form. They act like a lightning rod,

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>grounding tribal energy, so it doesn't always arc into violence.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But outside the stadium, when the same circuitry is recruited

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for politics, religion, race, the consequences aren't so harmless because

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then the stakes are higher and the hostility doesn't turn

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>off when the whistle blows. So here's what the neurosigence

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>shows us about this. The amigdala, which we often think

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of as a detector of fear, is also a sentinel

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for otherness. It flares up when we see faces from

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>outside our group. The salience network orients our attention to

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>those differences, telling the brain this matters. Watch closely. Meanwhile,

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the chemicals involved in bonding, like oxytocin. These surge up

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>when we're with our in group, rewarding us for loyalty,

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for cooperation, for connection. It feels good to be with us,

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>which by implication, makes them feel even more alien. Okay, Now,

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about summer camps or sports, that's one thing.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But now take tribal categories and add decades or centuries

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of history and culture, and toss in some ideology, whether

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>political or religious or whatever. Then the effect really deepens.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So my lab Ryan is study on this. Imagine yourself

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lying on back in a brain imaging machine fMRI. You

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>see a screen with six people's hands on it, and

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the computer goes around and randomly picks one of the hands.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Then you see that hand get stabbed with a syringe needle.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Now your brain has a very fast and low level response.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>A network of areas comes online and we summarize that

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as the pain matrix. This is the same set of

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>areas that would come online if your hand was getting stabbed.

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting part is that this is not your hand.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You're watching someone else's hand get stabbed. And this is

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the neural basis of empathy. You see something happen to

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>someone else, but your brain runs a simulation about how

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that must feel and how that would hurt. Okay, but

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>now the experiment changes. We add a one word label

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to each hand Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, scientologist to atheists,

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and now you watch the computer pick one of these

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>hands at random and get stabbed. And the question is

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does your brain care more when it is a member

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of your in group and doesn't care less when the

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.239
<v Speaker 1>hand is labeled as any one of your outgroups? And

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that is precisely what happens. We tested over one hundred

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people of all different faiths, including atheists, and that's the

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>clear picture. When the suffering belongs to a hand labeled

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>as your group, the pain matrix has a big response,

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But when the very same pain is inflicted on a

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>member of an outgroup, those circuits dim The response is weaker,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so your brain distributes empathy unequally. It follows the boundaries

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of us and them. Other colleagues of might have found

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same pattern. For example, my colleague Tanya Singer,

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>she studied this with soccer fans. She recruited diehard supporters

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of teams and put them into brains scanners and showed

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>them videos of fans receiving painful shocks. Sometimes it was

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fellow fans, sometimes it was rival fans, and when their

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>own teams fans suffered, these empathy circuits came online. But

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>when the rival fans took the same shock, there was

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>less of a response, and in some brains something even

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>more surprising appeared, which was activity in the reward circuits.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The suffering of rivals didn't just fail to evoke empathy,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it evoked pleasure. So when we talk about polarization, we're

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about deep circuits firing in the brain, circuits designed

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.479
<v Speaker 1>long ago for survival and small tribes. And these circuits

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are fast and automatic and they run reliably under the hood.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at all these studies together, from

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the circuits that involved looking at fellow humans to the

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>circuits that come online when we watch other people and

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pain when you put all these studies together, it's clear

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that empathy is not a light that shines equally on everyone.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It depends on who is in your in groups and

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>who in your outgroups. Now, I want to point out

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>two more related aspects of polarization that I think are

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>often left out of the conversation. The first has to

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do with identity and the second with belonging. So let's

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>start with identity. In twenty sixteen, Jonas Kaplan and Sam

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Harris invited people to participate in an fMRI study, so

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>people would lie down in the brain scanner and see

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>statements about politics. Some of the statements were neutral, but

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>others directly contradicted the participants' core political beliefs. What happened

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was that the amygdala and the insula lit up. And

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>these are the same regions we see when the body

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>feels physically threatened. In other words, when people encountered ideas

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that clashed with their politics, their brains reacted as though

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>under siege. But this is another way. Someone disagreeing with

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>your politics is not experienced as oh, that's interesting, you

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have a different opinion. It's experienced as something analogous to

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you are attacking me. When political belief is wired into

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the same threat circuitry as our sense of self. Then

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise that debate becomes combat or that political

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>disagreement is perceived as aggression. It is no wonder that

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>arguments get so heated at the dinner table. It's no

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder that threads on social media devolve into shouting matches.

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>From the point of view of the brain, in these situations,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people feel like they're in danger. When some people say

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>things like words are violence, that squelch is meaningful thinking

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and is quite frankly spineless. But when I saw this

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>study some years ago, I thought, ah, okay, that's why

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it. This is no defense of shutting down

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech, but it sheds light on why people deep

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>down really want to maintain free speech for their side

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but shut it down for the other side. So this

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is a very important issue about how beliefs become identity.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You always see this in the language that we use.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>People will say things like as a conservative or as

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a progressive, I believe, and the signals that what we're

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about to hear has elements of a self definition. It's

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>embedded in their identity. And when identity is threatened people

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>double down. In fact, a bunch of studies show that

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>when deeply held beliefs are challenged, people often emerge even

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>more convinced of their beliefs. This is a cognitive bias

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>called the backfire effect, in which a person's beliefs become

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more entrenched and stronger when presented with evidence that contradicts them.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's precisely because it's a form of defense against

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a personal attack. Now, this hopefully makes it clear why

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>facts alone so rarely change minds. Present somebody with evidence

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that contradicts their worldview, and you might expect to see curiosity,

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but we rarely see that. We see resistance. The brain

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is protecting what it perceives as the self. Now, just

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, this isn't about laughing at other people's foibles.

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>We've all felt this ourselves at some level. Really, think

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>about a time when someone questioned something that you felt

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was core to who you are. Maybe it was your

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>religious beliefs, or your political stance, or something about your

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>country of origin or whatever. Chances are, your body reacted.

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you had a quickening heart rate or a flush

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of heat, or a tightening in your chest. Your threat

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>circuits were activated. Your amigdala and insula were firing. Your

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>brain was preparing to defend itself. Now, not all beliefs

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are fused with identity. If someone challenges your belief about

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the best way to fix the car engine or which

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurant has the best tacos, you might say, okay, cool,

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll think about that. That's a belief floating freely. It's

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not attached to your selfhood. But if someone challenges your

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>belief about your values, your tribe, your politics, that's more

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>fused with your identity, and you are more likely to

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>defend that with vim and vigor. Now, one of the

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>dangers about a period of high polarization is that more

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and more beliefs become fused with who you are, so

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it pretty quickly reaches beyond people disagreeing about academic theories,

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of taxation or healthcare. The political disagreements get bundled up

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with identities. Who you vote for, where you live, what

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>media you consume, what brands you buy. A red baseball

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>cap or a rainbow flag can suggest to you things

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about a person's politics before a single word is spoken.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>There's also a psychological comfort infused identity, which brings us

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to the second point. It tells you who you are,

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and it tells you who your people are. In other words,

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>while it's often tempting to think about polarization as something

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>about social media and news stations, underneath all of that

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>there's another angle which is belonging. For example, I mentioned

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier the hormone oxytocin. This is often called the love

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>hormone or the bonding hormone, and that's because it surges

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>when we hug, when we kiss, when we fall in love,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and more generally, it helps bond groups together. It strengthens

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>trust between friends. If you could bottle the warmth of

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>human closeness, oxytocin would be one of the main ingredients.

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's a dark side to the oxytocin story because

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>other research has shown that it increases empathy and generosity selectively.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>What it does is it sharpens the line between us

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and them. So, for example, in one experiment, participants were

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>given oxytocin and then they played a little economics game

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with each other where they're making trades, and what happens

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is that when they have this extra oxytocin, people become

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 1>more generous towards members of their own group, but less

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>generous toward outsiders. The same chemical that makes them extend

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>kindness to their in group members turns them against their outgroup.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like you've only got so much ability to bond

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and that all gets funneled to your tribe. And oxytocin

0:38:59.920 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of several chemicals involved. You've heard of dopamine,

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>which is involved in the reward system. The research shows

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that dopamine release is higher when we cooperate with in

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>group members. Same thing happens with serotonin, which helps regulate

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>feelings of trust and belonging. You've also got endorphins, which

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 1>flow during synchronized activities that you do with an in group,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and this, I suspect is why rituals matter so much.

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I devoted episode fifty four to this question of why

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>armies march in step, or why religious congregations chant together,

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>or why sports fans do things in unison. Synchronized movement

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and shared rhythms amplify endorphin release, creating a larger sense

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of us. So collectively, these are the biological undercurrents of

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>human connection, and they have evolved to feel good to us.

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We like to be coordinate with our in groups, but

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that the stronger the US, the sharper

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>than them. All you have to do is study any

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>war period or even just highly polarized period to see

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that the stronger the in group bond, the more ferocious

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the outgroup hatred. So all this is to say, part

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of why polarization can feel so intoxicating is that it's

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not just the anger or outrage piece. It's equally the

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>belonging piece to be part of aside to march and

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>step with others, to chant the same slogans, to share

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the same memes. That is rewarding to the brain and

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>even in some ways addictive. So I've told you several

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>different aspects of polarization, from dehumanization to propaganda, to in

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>groups and outgroups, to issues of identity and belonging. But

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this was all table setting because what I really want

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is pose the critical question and what do

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we do about all this? If we understand something about

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the neuroscience that leads to polarization, can we use this

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>same knowledge to do something about it. That's what part

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>two of this podcast is going to be next week.

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's one piece that I want to flag again,

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which is education. To my mind. The most important thing

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we can do is teach people about what's going on

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>at the intersection of brains and politics, because that's the

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>only way we don't fall for it every time. We

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to recognize when language collapses humans

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>into pests, or when headlines portray opponents as monsters, or

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>when memes strip away complexity in favor of ridicule. People,

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>especially young people, need to be able to recognize when

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these ancient levers are being pulled. Why because propaganda is

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>never going going away. As long as we have brains

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that can be polarized, there will be people who try

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to exploit that for whatever reasons, their own beliefs, or

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>they realize it's working to give them power, or it

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gives them a solid sense of belonging. Whatever the reason,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>people will always pull these tricks. And the best defense,

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>possibly the only defense, is simply awareness. To understand how

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>these tricks work, so we can recognize them from a

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>mile away. That way we can at least resist the poll. So,

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in closing today, where does this leave us? My position

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>here is that you can't explain polarization only in terms

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of social media or which party is winning the election.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We also have to understand the brains that we are

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>all yoked with. We began with cockroaches on the Rwandan radio,

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 1>rats and Nazi cartoons, apes and American posters. We saw

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>how quickly the brain can dial down empathy when the

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>right metaphors are deployed. We follow the circuitry into the lab,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where empathy surges for in groups but dims for rivals.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw children at summer camp turn into enemies in

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a manner of hours. We traced the pull of identity,

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the power of disgust, and the shadow side of the

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>hormones and chemicals that bond us. The end result is

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that our threat circuitry is like a smoke detector set

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on high sensitivity. It goes off at the faintest whiff,

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>even when there's no fire. And we've seen how history,

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>again and again has weaponized these vulnerabilities of the brain.

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>But this is all just laying the foundation, and now

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to see next week. My argument that this

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is not destiny. The challenge for us is not to

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>abolish tribalism, because I'm not sure that we can, but

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>instead to channel it, to find out that let us

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>experience belonging without dehumanization generally to expand the circle of

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>who counts as us, and I'll explain how we can

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, and to learn to recognize the tricks of dehumanization,

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because somehow every generation falls for them anew like it's

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time. We now have more educational firepower than

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had in global history, and it's time to

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure everyone knows the tricks of the trade so

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we can have some immunity against them. When we understand

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the neuroscience of polarization, we have the opportunity to derive

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of hope because the same brains that

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>divide us under different conditions can unite us. The key

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>thing about the brain is that it's live wired. It's

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>always adapting, it's always reshaping its circuitry. So what we'll

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>see next week is that even when tribalism mutes empathy,

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>shared goals and cooperation can reignite it. And where propaganda

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can dimn humanness perspective, taking can light it up again

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to see how we might build a better world. Please

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 1>join me next week for part two. Go to Eagleman

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast for more information and to find

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>further reading. Join the weekly discussions on my substack and

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>check out Subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of each episode and to leave comments until next time.

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman and this is Inner Cosmos.