WEBVTT - Political Polarization is Solvable

0:00:15.076 --> 0:00:24.876
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin, This is solvable. I'm Jacob Weisberg. So these are

0:00:24.876 --> 0:00:28.716
<v Speaker 1>people who are seditionists. They don't accept the legitimacy of

0:00:28.716 --> 0:00:31.316
<v Speaker 1>the state, of the government, of the institutions, and they

0:00:31.356 --> 0:00:35.116
<v Speaker 1>would like to overthrow them. The United States is facing

0:00:35.116 --> 0:00:38.956
<v Speaker 1>a challenge we haven't confronted since the Civil War. On

0:00:39.116 --> 0:00:43.396
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, we experienced a physical assault against our democracy,

0:00:43.996 --> 0:00:48.116
<v Speaker 1>and a significant segment of society continues to support the assault,

0:00:48.476 --> 0:00:51.716
<v Speaker 1>not our democracy. This is too many people to wish away,

0:00:51.756 --> 0:00:54.716
<v Speaker 1>it's too many people to shun. It's even too many

0:00:54.756 --> 0:00:57.436
<v Speaker 1>people to cancel. So what do we do about this

0:00:57.516 --> 0:01:01.916
<v Speaker 1>extreme polarization? How do we live alongside people who reject

0:01:01.916 --> 0:01:04.596
<v Speaker 1>our system of government? How can we get back to

0:01:04.676 --> 0:01:09.356
<v Speaker 1>healthier kinds of political disagreement? Here, it's solvable. We're going

0:01:09.356 --> 0:01:12.636
<v Speaker 1>to take a deeper look at the problem of American polarization.

0:01:13.596 --> 0:01:15.436
<v Speaker 1>As the fits the approach of the show. We're going

0:01:15.476 --> 0:01:18.236
<v Speaker 1>to have a series of conversations focused on solutions and

0:01:18.356 --> 0:01:22.316
<v Speaker 1>making things better. Our question is what works to reduce

0:01:22.436 --> 0:01:26.436
<v Speaker 1>extremism and division in terms of finding common ground and

0:01:26.476 --> 0:01:30.276
<v Speaker 1>building bridges, in terms of redesigning social media, and in

0:01:30.356 --> 0:01:34.396
<v Speaker 1>terms of political leadership Last week, we heard Ann Applebaum

0:01:34.516 --> 0:01:38.676
<v Speaker 1>talk to Juan Manuel Santo's about the process of reconciliation

0:01:38.796 --> 0:01:43.836
<v Speaker 1>with former guerrillas after Columbia's long, horrific civil war. Today,

0:01:43.876 --> 0:01:46.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk with Anne herself. She's a Pulitzer

0:01:46.876 --> 0:01:50.356
<v Speaker 1>Prize winning historian an expert on the former Soviet Bloc.

0:01:50.916 --> 0:01:54.036
<v Speaker 1>Anne has been looking at vulnerable democracies around the world,

0:01:54.356 --> 0:01:56.836
<v Speaker 1>and she has some ideas about what has and hasn't

0:01:56.876 --> 0:01:59.676
<v Speaker 1>worked in other countries. This will sound a little strange,

0:02:00.196 --> 0:02:03.996
<v Speaker 1>but another really interesting example of a place that depolarized

0:02:04.436 --> 0:02:08.356
<v Speaker 1>is actually Canada. So some solutions may be closer than

0:02:08.396 --> 0:02:12.356
<v Speaker 1>we realize. I'm Anne Applebaum. I'm one of the hosts

0:02:12.396 --> 0:02:15.396
<v Speaker 1>of the Solvable podcast. I'm a staff writer for The Atlantic,

0:02:15.676 --> 0:02:23.516
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that political polarization is solvable. Hi Anne,

0:02:24.356 --> 0:02:31.236
<v Speaker 1>Hi Jacob. It's clear that we are in unprecedented territory

0:02:31.316 --> 0:02:34.476
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, and I wanted to kind

0:02:34.476 --> 0:02:37.636
<v Speaker 1>of start the conversation just by asking you to be

0:02:37.676 --> 0:02:42.436
<v Speaker 1>as precise as possible in naming this phenomenon and possibly

0:02:42.476 --> 0:02:45.396
<v Speaker 1>comparing it to other places. Do you call it a

0:02:45.476 --> 0:02:48.356
<v Speaker 1>breakdown to democracy? Do you call it polarization? What are

0:02:48.356 --> 0:02:52.516
<v Speaker 1>we living through right now. Polarization is clearly, you know,

0:02:52.636 --> 0:02:55.476
<v Speaker 1>a good word to use, but other words have been

0:02:55.556 --> 0:03:00.316
<v Speaker 1>used in the past, division, breaking up of political unity,

0:03:00.436 --> 0:03:03.876
<v Speaker 1>leading towards civil war. I think the more interesting question

0:03:04.236 --> 0:03:07.956
<v Speaker 1>is what to call the group of people who were

0:03:07.996 --> 0:03:11.036
<v Speaker 1>at the Capitol and genre the sixth and those in

0:03:11.076 --> 0:03:14.396
<v Speaker 1>the country who support them, because this is not the

0:03:14.436 --> 0:03:17.556
<v Speaker 1>same thing as the Republican Party, it's not the same

0:03:17.596 --> 0:03:21.476
<v Speaker 1>thing as conservatives. This is, in fact not a conservative group.

0:03:21.476 --> 0:03:24.316
<v Speaker 1>It's a radical group. And it's also very clear to

0:03:24.396 --> 0:03:28.076
<v Speaker 1>understand what they were doing there. They were not Republicans

0:03:28.116 --> 0:03:33.676
<v Speaker 1>attacking Democrats. They were actually attacking Congress itself, the institution.

0:03:33.716 --> 0:03:37.236
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to prevent Congress from recognizing and naming

0:03:37.276 --> 0:03:41.436
<v Speaker 1>the next president. This was actually an anti institutional, anti

0:03:41.516 --> 0:03:46.036
<v Speaker 1>systemic group, which is not something we're accustomed to in

0:03:46.116 --> 0:03:49.756
<v Speaker 1>American history, at least not since the Civil War. But

0:03:49.836 --> 0:03:52.516
<v Speaker 1>it is something that you can see in other times

0:03:52.516 --> 0:03:56.516
<v Speaker 1>and places. You can see it, for example, in Northern Ireland,

0:03:56.556 --> 0:03:59.476
<v Speaker 1>where there was during the era of the Troubles, there

0:03:59.596 --> 0:04:01.956
<v Speaker 1>was a group of people who lived in Northern Ireland

0:04:01.996 --> 0:04:05.876
<v Speaker 1>who didn't accept the legitimate government of Northern Ireland and

0:04:06.036 --> 0:04:10.116
<v Speaker 1>became terrorists or supporters of terror because they wanted to

0:04:10.156 --> 0:04:14.276
<v Speaker 1>overthrow it. You can look at a country like Columbia

0:04:14.356 --> 0:04:18.316
<v Speaker 1>where you see an insurgency that fought for fifty years,

0:04:18.756 --> 0:04:21.516
<v Speaker 1>living in the jungle and living off kidnapping and drug

0:04:21.556 --> 0:04:24.796
<v Speaker 1>dealing because they didn't accept the legitimacy of the government.

0:04:25.036 --> 0:04:27.636
<v Speaker 1>And although those are more extreme versions than what we have,

0:04:28.076 --> 0:04:29.876
<v Speaker 1>that's really what we're talking about. And so then the

0:04:29.956 --> 0:04:32.596
<v Speaker 1>question is whether it's the best word to use, insurgency

0:04:32.716 --> 0:04:36.316
<v Speaker 1>or insurrectionist. Some people have had an argument about whether

0:04:36.436 --> 0:04:38.956
<v Speaker 1>to say fascist, and of course there are ways in

0:04:38.996 --> 0:04:42.396
<v Speaker 1>which this group resembles fascism of the nineteen thirties. I

0:04:42.396 --> 0:04:45.916
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a useful term because it conjures up

0:04:45.916 --> 0:04:48.436
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of other things, and you know, we're not

0:04:48.516 --> 0:04:50.996
<v Speaker 1>talking about mass murder or anything like that, and I

0:04:50.996 --> 0:04:54.076
<v Speaker 1>feel it's a distracting term. And the term I settled

0:04:54.116 --> 0:04:57.276
<v Speaker 1>on in a couple of things I've written recently is

0:04:57.276 --> 0:05:01.636
<v Speaker 1>actually seditionists. So these are people who are seditionists. They

0:05:01.836 --> 0:05:04.956
<v Speaker 1>don't accept the you know, the legitimacy of the state,

0:05:04.996 --> 0:05:07.556
<v Speaker 1>of the government, of the institutions, and they would like

0:05:07.636 --> 0:05:11.076
<v Speaker 1>to overthrow them. So then the question is how the

0:05:11.156 --> 0:05:13.996
<v Speaker 1>rest of us deal with that. Even in that and

0:05:14.316 --> 0:05:16.636
<v Speaker 1>I agree that's a that's a useful term here, and

0:05:16.676 --> 0:05:19.916
<v Speaker 1>I think seditionists rather than secessionists, because these people are

0:05:19.956 --> 0:05:22.636
<v Speaker 1>not trying to start their own country or break away

0:05:22.636 --> 0:05:27.076
<v Speaker 1>into too a different political body as in the Confederacy

0:05:27.196 --> 0:05:30.916
<v Speaker 1>during the Civil War. But even that term, seditionists can

0:05:30.996 --> 0:05:35.916
<v Speaker 1>include everyone from the fairly large section of the population

0:05:36.436 --> 0:05:39.156
<v Speaker 1>that will, in response to Paul, say they think the

0:05:39.196 --> 0:05:43.196
<v Speaker 1>election was stolen, a much smaller segment of the population

0:05:43.276 --> 0:05:46.916
<v Speaker 1>that would support violence, a smaller proportion than that that

0:05:46.996 --> 0:05:50.516
<v Speaker 1>would be violent. And then maybe even within that, you

0:05:50.556 --> 0:05:54.236
<v Speaker 1>know this very strange fantasy land of the of the

0:05:54.356 --> 0:05:57.916
<v Speaker 1>QAnon people, which is more like, you know, ac cult

0:05:57.956 --> 0:06:01.836
<v Speaker 1>within the seditionists. Would you would you describe it that

0:06:01.876 --> 0:06:05.156
<v Speaker 1>way in terms of those kind of concentric circles. Yes,

0:06:05.436 --> 0:06:11.036
<v Speaker 1>Although what interests me is one particular group, namely, I'm

0:06:11.076 --> 0:06:14.036
<v Speaker 1>interested in the people who sympathized with the storming of

0:06:14.076 --> 0:06:16.756
<v Speaker 1>the capital. In other words, you know, there is a

0:06:16.796 --> 0:06:19.636
<v Speaker 1>group of people who think Trump probably won the election,

0:06:19.716 --> 0:06:22.676
<v Speaker 1>or anyway somehow the election was unfair. But then there's

0:06:22.956 --> 0:06:27.196
<v Speaker 1>a narrower group of people who actually think the system

0:06:27.276 --> 0:06:31.996
<v Speaker 1>should be overthrown. And I say narrow, it's not that narrow.

0:06:32.316 --> 0:06:34.996
<v Speaker 1>One poll that was done pretty soon after January sixth

0:06:35.316 --> 0:06:37.916
<v Speaker 1>showed something like twenty percent I think it's twenty one

0:06:37.956 --> 0:06:42.076
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans said they supported that they supported the insurrection,

0:06:42.756 --> 0:06:46.236
<v Speaker 1>even assuming that not all those people pay that much

0:06:46.276 --> 0:06:48.956
<v Speaker 1>attention to politics, and some of them have probably since

0:06:48.996 --> 0:06:51.036
<v Speaker 1>then changed their minds. And so even if we say

0:06:51.076 --> 0:06:53.876
<v Speaker 1>it's ten percent, you know, ten percent of the country,

0:06:54.036 --> 0:06:58.076
<v Speaker 1>that's a very large number who don't think that our

0:06:58.116 --> 0:07:01.516
<v Speaker 1>political institutions work, who don't see any point in cooperating

0:07:01.516 --> 0:07:04.596
<v Speaker 1>with them, who presumably don't see much point in voting

0:07:04.716 --> 0:07:07.996
<v Speaker 1>or in participating in normal politics, and they would support

0:07:08.036 --> 0:07:11.716
<v Speaker 1>efforts to undermine them. That's not a problem that we've

0:07:11.716 --> 0:07:15.756
<v Speaker 1>had in recent history. So I guess the question you

0:07:15.836 --> 0:07:18.916
<v Speaker 1>get to right away is take that twenty one percent

0:07:19.036 --> 0:07:22.476
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is. Where do we fight them, Where

0:07:22.476 --> 0:07:25.076
<v Speaker 1>do we ignore them? How do we deal with them?

0:07:25.916 --> 0:07:29.596
<v Speaker 1>So the lessons from countries that have had an experience

0:07:29.636 --> 0:07:32.236
<v Speaker 1>like this, So countries again that have had an insurgency

0:07:32.356 --> 0:07:35.996
<v Speaker 1>or a terrorist movement within their you know, within their borders,

0:07:36.636 --> 0:07:40.116
<v Speaker 1>very often the things that you think will work like it,

0:07:40.396 --> 0:07:42.476
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it be so great if we all got together

0:07:42.516 --> 0:07:45.836
<v Speaker 1>and just debated it all out? Their number of charities

0:07:45.836 --> 0:07:48.836
<v Speaker 1>in the US that actually there's a famous one called

0:07:48.876 --> 0:07:51.356
<v Speaker 1>braver Angels that brings people together, you know, Blue and

0:07:51.436 --> 0:07:54.276
<v Speaker 1>Red team people together in rooms and has them argue

0:07:54.396 --> 0:07:57.996
<v Speaker 1>or right. I mean, most of that, while maybe it's

0:07:58.196 --> 0:08:01.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, useful for a few people, is actually pointless

0:08:01.636 --> 0:08:03.956
<v Speaker 1>because when you have people who see the world through

0:08:03.996 --> 0:08:06.716
<v Speaker 1>such completely different lenses, you will not get them to

0:08:06.796 --> 0:08:11.236
<v Speaker 1>agree on politics and anything existential. If you get them

0:08:11.236 --> 0:08:14.436
<v Speaker 1>in a room together, much more useful. And again this

0:08:14.596 --> 0:08:17.036
<v Speaker 1>is counterintuitive and it's not a solution that lots of

0:08:17.036 --> 0:08:20.396
<v Speaker 1>people like, at least when they first encounter it. Is

0:08:20.476 --> 0:08:23.956
<v Speaker 1>it's much better to change the subject. In other words,

0:08:24.476 --> 0:08:27.716
<v Speaker 1>get people to work together, to do projects together, and

0:08:27.836 --> 0:08:31.916
<v Speaker 1>do things together that are constructive, but without talking about

0:08:32.076 --> 0:08:36.636
<v Speaker 1>or discussing the very the existential issues that divide us.

0:08:36.996 --> 0:08:39.156
<v Speaker 1>And so when this has been done in towns in

0:08:39.196 --> 0:08:42.956
<v Speaker 1>Northern Ireland, it means something like, you know, the town

0:08:43.076 --> 0:08:45.876
<v Speaker 1>builds a community center, or they build a road, or

0:08:45.956 --> 0:08:50.876
<v Speaker 1>they organize a theater festival and members from both communities

0:08:50.916 --> 0:08:54.676
<v Speaker 1>participate and while they're participating, they're talking about the road

0:08:55.156 --> 0:08:57.876
<v Speaker 1>or the community center, and they're not talking about who

0:08:57.916 --> 0:09:00.876
<v Speaker 1>should be in charge of Ireland Northern Ireland, should it

0:09:00.916 --> 0:09:04.236
<v Speaker 1>be Ireland or Great Britain. I can imagine, for example,

0:09:04.596 --> 0:09:07.236
<v Speaker 1>in the US, a way you could. I mean, for example,

0:09:07.916 --> 0:09:11.076
<v Speaker 1>we need to have secure at state capitals. State capitals

0:09:11.076 --> 0:09:13.996
<v Speaker 1>have been the site of some violent protests recently, So

0:09:14.076 --> 0:09:15.836
<v Speaker 1>a useful thing to do would be to have a

0:09:15.916 --> 0:09:19.316
<v Speaker 1>meeting where you've got members of the different communities from

0:09:19.316 --> 0:09:22.316
<v Speaker 1>the far right and the far left and mainstream politics,

0:09:22.356 --> 0:09:25.276
<v Speaker 1>and you've got them together and said, let's think about

0:09:25.276 --> 0:09:29.276
<v Speaker 1>how we create safety at our around the Ohio State Capital.

0:09:29.676 --> 0:09:31.996
<v Speaker 1>They're not focused on the things they're protesting about. They're

0:09:32.036 --> 0:09:35.836
<v Speaker 1>focusing on how they create security at the Ohio State Capital.

0:09:36.076 --> 0:09:38.476
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't mean they hate each other any less,

0:09:38.996 --> 0:09:41.196
<v Speaker 1>but it does mean that the following day, when there

0:09:41.196 --> 0:09:44.236
<v Speaker 1>are demonstrations there, they might not kill each other. You know,

0:09:44.276 --> 0:09:47.196
<v Speaker 1>the goal is prevention of violence, and the goal is

0:09:47.596 --> 0:09:52.076
<v Speaker 1>living alongside one another even when we don't agree. But

0:09:52.196 --> 0:09:55.236
<v Speaker 1>don't we need some sense that this was an extraordinary

0:09:55.276 --> 0:09:59.396
<v Speaker 1>event and that the people who supported it need to

0:09:59.396 --> 0:10:02.036
<v Speaker 1>be made accountable. For it and need to realize that

0:10:02.076 --> 0:10:05.356
<v Speaker 1>what they did was not acceptable. I mean in South Africa,

0:10:05.396 --> 0:10:09.116
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, there was the Truth and Conciliation Commission,

0:10:09.196 --> 0:10:12.876
<v Speaker 1>and in post communist societies, you know, there was certainly

0:10:12.916 --> 0:10:16.996
<v Speaker 1>a lot of delayed justice and denied justice. But you know,

0:10:17.036 --> 0:10:19.996
<v Speaker 1>in many of the countries, as you've written about, you know,

0:10:20.076 --> 0:10:23.916
<v Speaker 1>there was some sense of holding people accountable to just

0:10:23.956 --> 0:10:28.556
<v Speaker 1>sort of go back to normal and kind of ignore it.

0:10:28.556 --> 0:10:30.316
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think you're saying that the people

0:10:30.316 --> 0:10:33.676
<v Speaker 1>who participated in violence in the capital shouldn't be prosecuted

0:10:33.796 --> 0:10:36.996
<v Speaker 1>or that we should drop all that. But it's certainly

0:10:37.036 --> 0:10:40.596
<v Speaker 1>true that anybody who broke into the capital or committed

0:10:40.596 --> 0:10:44.836
<v Speaker 1>crimes at the capitol should be prosecuted. And I'm absolutely

0:10:44.836 --> 0:10:47.676
<v Speaker 1>in favor of that, and I also very much hope

0:10:47.676 --> 0:10:50.436
<v Speaker 1>that former president will be impeached. The trouble is that

0:10:50.476 --> 0:10:53.116
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about a really large number of people.

0:10:53.396 --> 0:10:55.476
<v Speaker 1>As I said, we might be talking about ten to

0:10:55.556 --> 0:10:58.156
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of the country. You know, you always have

0:10:58.436 --> 0:11:03.036
<v Speaker 1>in post communist and post dictatorship situations, you always have

0:11:03.156 --> 0:11:05.796
<v Speaker 1>some kind of trade off or balance between the demands

0:11:05.796 --> 0:11:09.756
<v Speaker 1>of justice and the demands of practical lady, you know

0:11:09.876 --> 0:11:12.236
<v Speaker 1>what can you you know, how many people can you

0:11:12.356 --> 0:11:17.276
<v Speaker 1>try from the old regime before you inflame the supporters

0:11:17.276 --> 0:11:19.476
<v Speaker 1>of the old regime and cause a backlash. I mean,

0:11:19.836 --> 0:11:21.516
<v Speaker 1>if you look at history, you can see how this

0:11:21.556 --> 0:11:23.436
<v Speaker 1>has been done well and badly in different places. I

0:11:23.436 --> 0:11:25.876
<v Speaker 1>mean a famous example of where it was done really

0:11:25.876 --> 0:11:29.636
<v Speaker 1>badly was in Iraq, where we conducted as the when

0:11:29.636 --> 0:11:31.676
<v Speaker 1>the Americans were occupying a rock after the fall of

0:11:31.676 --> 0:11:35.476
<v Speaker 1>Saddam Hussein, we conducted a program called de Bathification, which

0:11:35.556 --> 0:11:39.396
<v Speaker 1>was all the members of the Saddam's Bath Party were

0:11:39.436 --> 0:11:42.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, lost their jobs, were sent home, you know,

0:11:42.116 --> 0:11:45.516
<v Speaker 1>we were held accountable for the regime, and the result

0:11:45.716 --> 0:11:49.356
<v Speaker 1>was that many of them reformed, regrouped, and became the

0:11:49.876 --> 0:11:54.436
<v Speaker 1>terrorist insurgencies that fought American troops for years afterwards. Because

0:11:54.436 --> 0:11:57.076
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about so many people, that's not a great

0:11:57.116 --> 0:12:00.636
<v Speaker 1>model for us. I really understand. I mean, believe me,

0:12:00.676 --> 0:12:04.076
<v Speaker 1>I understand the urge to want to shun people, to

0:12:04.276 --> 0:12:07.796
<v Speaker 1>block them, to say you can't hold office, to to

0:12:07.796 --> 0:12:10.356
<v Speaker 1>try and keep them out of public life. All I'm

0:12:10.396 --> 0:12:13.116
<v Speaker 1>saying is that that's probably not going to work, and

0:12:13.196 --> 0:12:16.476
<v Speaker 1>the and the evidence from other countries you know where

0:12:16.516 --> 0:12:20.436
<v Speaker 1>you've had big insurgencies. I mean again Northern Ireland. You know,

0:12:20.476 --> 0:12:24.476
<v Speaker 1>the British tried to you know, eliminate the the IRA

0:12:24.756 --> 0:12:30.076
<v Speaker 1>for many years through harsh, tough police enforcement, through you know, fighting,

0:12:30.196 --> 0:12:33.756
<v Speaker 1>through infiltration of the communities, and one of the main

0:12:33.836 --> 0:12:36.516
<v Speaker 1>results was that the support and sympathy for the IRA

0:12:36.796 --> 0:12:39.556
<v Speaker 1>grew and grew and grew. And it really only wasn't

0:12:39.596 --> 0:12:43.556
<v Speaker 1>until they changed tactics and they began talking, you know,

0:12:43.636 --> 0:12:46.476
<v Speaker 1>in a different way about accommodating the not just the

0:12:46.636 --> 0:12:49.436
<v Speaker 1>RA but the Catholic community more broadly in Northern Ireland

0:12:49.436 --> 0:12:51.876
<v Speaker 1>that they began to get a sea change in terms

0:12:51.916 --> 0:12:54.516
<v Speaker 1>of public attitudes. You know, this is too many people

0:12:54.556 --> 0:12:57.836
<v Speaker 1>to wish away, it's too many people to shun. It's

0:12:57.876 --> 0:13:00.236
<v Speaker 1>even too many people to cancel, you know, and prevent

0:13:00.276 --> 0:13:02.196
<v Speaker 1>them all, you know, you have them all be fired.

0:13:02.236 --> 0:13:05.356
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's simply not going to work. And so

0:13:05.396 --> 0:13:08.636
<v Speaker 1>we need to begin looking at some other tactics, you know,

0:13:08.716 --> 0:13:11.876
<v Speaker 1>in which we can somehow live together. How do you

0:13:11.916 --> 0:13:14.436
<v Speaker 1>plan to handle this at a personal level, I mean

0:13:14.436 --> 0:13:17.796
<v Speaker 1>I've had all these fantasies going on inside my head.

0:13:17.836 --> 0:13:20.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was, you know, years ago once at

0:13:20.436 --> 0:13:23.116
<v Speaker 1>a dinner party with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, and

0:13:23.156 --> 0:13:25.196
<v Speaker 1>I sort of said to myself, I'll never do that again.

0:13:25.236 --> 0:13:26.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I'm ever in a room with them

0:13:26.956 --> 0:13:29.756
<v Speaker 1>on a social occasion, I'll you know, I'll storm out.

0:13:29.796 --> 0:13:32.196
<v Speaker 1>You know I won't. I won't break bread with them.

0:13:32.316 --> 0:13:35.156
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking, you know, in the old days, like you,

0:13:35.316 --> 0:13:37.676
<v Speaker 1>I would go on a lot of panel discussions and

0:13:38.076 --> 0:13:41.636
<v Speaker 1>TV appearances where you're pitted, as in my case, the

0:13:41.756 --> 0:13:45.836
<v Speaker 1>liberal opposite a conservative, and I've sort of said to myself, well,

0:13:45.876 --> 0:13:48.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do that with people who rejected

0:13:48.156 --> 0:13:52.716
<v Speaker 1>the election results because I feel like they're outside the

0:13:52.876 --> 0:13:58.556
<v Speaker 1>boundary of acceptable democratic values. And you know, I won't.

0:13:58.956 --> 0:14:02.476
<v Speaker 1>I don't think those people deserve equal time. That's my

0:14:02.516 --> 0:14:05.476
<v Speaker 1>emotional feeling. I hear, absolutely hear what you're saying. I

0:14:05.516 --> 0:14:08.276
<v Speaker 1>think you're right that it's not going to be productive

0:14:08.396 --> 0:14:13.116
<v Speaker 1>to those people more aggressively contribute to the polarization from

0:14:13.116 --> 0:14:15.236
<v Speaker 1>the other side. But honestly, I'm not quite sure how

0:14:15.276 --> 0:14:18.316
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it, because I'm so enraged by people

0:14:18.436 --> 0:14:22.036
<v Speaker 1>who've taken that position, including a majority of the Republicans

0:14:22.036 --> 0:14:24.236
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, that I don't know how I would handle

0:14:24.276 --> 0:14:26.996
<v Speaker 1>being around them. I mean, I think the way one

0:14:27.076 --> 0:14:30.516
<v Speaker 1>deals with it personally depends on who you are and

0:14:30.556 --> 0:14:32.116
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, what your role is. I mean, I

0:14:32.116 --> 0:14:34.436
<v Speaker 1>think you, as a journalist, are well within your rights

0:14:34.436 --> 0:14:36.916
<v Speaker 1>to say I won't be on a panel with someone

0:14:36.996 --> 0:14:40.716
<v Speaker 1>who supported the insurrection or who didn't recognize who won

0:14:40.716 --> 0:14:43.916
<v Speaker 1>the election, and I might well agree with you on that. Actually,

0:14:44.276 --> 0:14:46.556
<v Speaker 1>I certainly had a rule. At the time of the

0:14:46.636 --> 0:14:49.556
<v Speaker 1>Russian invasion of Ukraine in twenty fourteen, I kept getting

0:14:49.596 --> 0:14:52.756
<v Speaker 1>put on television programs with spokesman for the Russian government

0:14:52.756 --> 0:14:56.076
<v Speaker 1>who would deny that the invasion was happening even while

0:14:56.116 --> 0:14:57.756
<v Speaker 1>it was happening. I mean, you could see it happen.

0:14:58.076 --> 0:15:00.116
<v Speaker 1>And I finally drew a line through that. I said,

0:15:00.116 --> 0:15:01.636
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, I'm not going to waste time

0:15:01.956 --> 0:15:04.236
<v Speaker 1>talking to people who want to pretend that there's an

0:15:04.236 --> 0:15:06.836
<v Speaker 1>alternate reality happening. And I think you know you're within

0:15:06.876 --> 0:15:09.596
<v Speaker 1>your rights to do that. I think the harder question

0:15:09.676 --> 0:15:11.796
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people, and I've been asked this

0:15:11.876 --> 0:15:14.116
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and I have a you know it touches

0:15:14.156 --> 0:15:19.076
<v Speaker 1>me personally, is what you do with old friends or

0:15:19.316 --> 0:15:23.676
<v Speaker 1>relatives or parents or people who you're very close to

0:15:24.236 --> 0:15:27.316
<v Speaker 1>who have bought into some piece of that alternate reality.

0:15:27.756 --> 0:15:30.036
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, I've heard from people who have relatives

0:15:30.076 --> 0:15:33.436
<v Speaker 1>who have started following the QAnon conspiracy. How do you

0:15:33.476 --> 0:15:36.356
<v Speaker 1>cope with that? And then we're in the realm of

0:15:36.836 --> 0:15:39.556
<v Speaker 1>sort of a different piece of sociology and experience, and

0:15:39.596 --> 0:15:43.916
<v Speaker 1>that's the realm of exit counseling. What is the advice

0:15:43.956 --> 0:15:46.076
<v Speaker 1>for people you'd like to help get out of qan? On?

0:15:46.436 --> 0:15:48.956
<v Speaker 1>Some of the advice there is an individual version of

0:15:48.956 --> 0:15:50.836
<v Speaker 1>what I just said, in other words, change the subject,

0:15:50.916 --> 0:15:53.236
<v Speaker 1>find other things to talk about. And then some of

0:15:53.276 --> 0:15:57.156
<v Speaker 1>the advice is try and help people to see the

0:15:57.316 --> 0:16:03.196
<v Speaker 1>contrast between the reality all around them and the false reality,

0:16:03.236 --> 0:16:06.236
<v Speaker 1>the alternative reality that they're seeing online, which is which

0:16:06.276 --> 0:16:10.236
<v Speaker 1>is what the problem is in America, the version of

0:16:10.236 --> 0:16:12.876
<v Speaker 1>events that they're reading on you know, whatever it is

0:16:13.036 --> 0:16:17.956
<v Speaker 1>Newsmax or or Facebook or gab or the Discord channel,

0:16:18.036 --> 0:16:21.396
<v Speaker 1>whatever whichever piece whichever social media they're seeing it on.

0:16:21.876 --> 0:16:27.116
<v Speaker 1>Try and present them constantly with alternatives and try also

0:16:27.476 --> 0:16:30.876
<v Speaker 1>to help them see that there is a future for

0:16:30.916 --> 0:16:34.756
<v Speaker 1>them in America run by Joe Biden and a Democratic Congress.

0:16:35.116 --> 0:16:37.276
<v Speaker 1>Because many of these people have come to feel. And

0:16:37.316 --> 0:16:38.876
<v Speaker 1>you can see this and hear it in some of

0:16:38.876 --> 0:16:41.716
<v Speaker 1>the things that the Republican congressman said. You know, they've

0:16:41.796 --> 0:16:45.076
<v Speaker 1>come to feel that. You know, how disingenuous or real

0:16:45.116 --> 0:16:46.716
<v Speaker 1>this is, you'll have to you know, it's very hard

0:16:46.756 --> 0:16:50.156
<v Speaker 1>to know, but that Biden's president represents the end of

0:16:50.156 --> 0:16:52.676
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of America, the end of a way

0:16:52.716 --> 0:16:56.796
<v Speaker 1>of life. It's something they can't reconcile themselves too. And

0:16:56.876 --> 0:16:59.396
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of our job, as their friends and

0:16:59.436 --> 0:17:03.556
<v Speaker 1>their relatives, to show them how they can reconcile themselves,

0:17:03.876 --> 0:17:06.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the way that Colombian insurgents need to

0:17:06.796 --> 0:17:11.236
<v Speaker 1>be offered some path back to a legal existence in Columbia.

0:17:11.276 --> 0:17:13.036
<v Speaker 1>They need to be brought back from the jungle and

0:17:13.116 --> 0:17:16.556
<v Speaker 1>retrained and helped to get new jobs. And I'm not

0:17:16.636 --> 0:17:19.756
<v Speaker 1>saying this is the same process, but there's some parallel

0:17:19.836 --> 0:17:23.276
<v Speaker 1>process that we should use towards people who we know

0:17:23.396 --> 0:17:25.596
<v Speaker 1>and who we're closed to, who are inside these cults.

0:17:26.196 --> 0:17:28.156
<v Speaker 1>But I guess two thoughts about that. I mean, one,

0:17:28.196 --> 0:17:32.676
<v Speaker 1>you know, you talked to one Manuel sentis the Nobel

0:17:32.716 --> 0:17:37.276
<v Speaker 1>Prize for President of Columbia for this program. You know,

0:17:37.436 --> 0:17:40.116
<v Speaker 1>that is a very different situation in the sense that

0:17:40.156 --> 0:17:43.636
<v Speaker 1>the rebels had been lost, the CentOS government was being

0:17:43.756 --> 0:17:48.316
<v Speaker 1>magnanimous towards them in its victory, recognizing, as I think

0:17:48.396 --> 0:17:50.196
<v Speaker 1>he said, that there was there was a trade off

0:17:50.236 --> 0:17:53.916
<v Speaker 1>between peace and justice and saying, let's get peace, even

0:17:53.956 --> 0:17:57.676
<v Speaker 1>if it's at the expense to some extent of immediate

0:17:57.716 --> 0:18:00.316
<v Speaker 1>justice for these people who have done terrible things. But

0:18:00.596 --> 0:18:04.396
<v Speaker 1>you know, they weren't dealing with a majority of the

0:18:04.436 --> 0:18:07.836
<v Speaker 1>opposition party. They were dealing with something more like a

0:18:07.916 --> 0:18:11.436
<v Speaker 1>remnant cult. That's true in that sense, they were luckier,

0:18:11.436 --> 0:18:14.916
<v Speaker 1>although we're not yet talking about this scale violence that

0:18:15.036 --> 0:18:18.196
<v Speaker 1>the FARC. This is the Colombian rebels. I'm committed, and

0:18:18.756 --> 0:18:22.316
<v Speaker 1>in Colombia, we're not talking about a illegal drug dealing,

0:18:22.436 --> 0:18:26.276
<v Speaker 1>kidnapping insurgency. So that so that's also that also makes

0:18:26.276 --> 0:18:28.516
<v Speaker 1>the story a little bit different. What you're now asking

0:18:28.596 --> 0:18:31.596
<v Speaker 1>is a slightly different problem, which is the problem of

0:18:31.636 --> 0:18:35.196
<v Speaker 1>how we you know, what happens to the Republican Party.

0:18:35.716 --> 0:18:38.556
<v Speaker 1>You know, and and here I think it's in our

0:18:38.636 --> 0:18:42.756
<v Speaker 1>interests as outsiders to the party, as as you know,

0:18:42.876 --> 0:18:45.756
<v Speaker 1>or former members of the party, as some people are

0:18:45.796 --> 0:18:48.076
<v Speaker 1>some of my friends are, or even people who are

0:18:48.076 --> 0:18:51.276
<v Speaker 1>still nominally in the party. There the task is to

0:18:52.316 --> 0:18:54.716
<v Speaker 1>win the battle for the heart and soul of the

0:18:54.756 --> 0:18:58.036
<v Speaker 1>party and bring it back to you know, even if

0:18:58.076 --> 0:19:01.196
<v Speaker 1>even if it's still you disagree with it, even if

0:19:01.236 --> 0:19:04.036
<v Speaker 1>it's still um you don't agree with their policies on

0:19:04.156 --> 0:19:06.996
<v Speaker 1>judges or abortion. We just want them to respect the

0:19:07.036 --> 0:19:11.196
<v Speaker 1>Constitution and we want them to to respect the rules

0:19:11.236 --> 0:19:14.236
<v Speaker 1>of rational discourse. And so it's therefore on all of

0:19:14.316 --> 0:19:16.116
<v Speaker 1>us to try to bring the party back there. And

0:19:16.196 --> 0:19:18.676
<v Speaker 1>I think, for example, what does that mean for people

0:19:18.716 --> 0:19:23.116
<v Speaker 1>who aren't in the party. It means praising, thanking, respecting,

0:19:23.276 --> 0:19:27.636
<v Speaker 1>giving time to giving TV time to those Republicans who

0:19:27.756 --> 0:19:33.356
<v Speaker 1>are willing to fight against the anti constitutional seditionists. And

0:19:33.476 --> 0:19:35.356
<v Speaker 1>even though it's people you might not like, you might

0:19:35.396 --> 0:19:37.556
<v Speaker 1>not you know, Liz Cheney might not be your cup

0:19:37.596 --> 0:19:42.596
<v Speaker 1>of tea. You know, certainly McConnell is not many Democrats

0:19:43.836 --> 0:19:47.356
<v Speaker 1>cup of tea. But giving him space on, you know,

0:19:47.396 --> 0:19:51.596
<v Speaker 1>in the media and letting him say praise Cheney and

0:19:51.716 --> 0:19:55.996
<v Speaker 1>denounce you know, the QAnon members of Congress is really important.

0:19:56.036 --> 0:19:58.516
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, this is really a battle that's best

0:19:58.596 --> 0:20:01.836
<v Speaker 1>one inside that party. And actually this brings me to another.

0:20:02.396 --> 0:20:05.516
<v Speaker 1>You know. Another lesson of countries like Northern Ireland and

0:20:05.516 --> 0:20:09.476
<v Speaker 1>Columbia is that people like you and me may not

0:20:09.676 --> 0:20:14.996
<v Speaker 1>be the best messengers for Republicans. I mean they may not.

0:20:15.156 --> 0:20:16.996
<v Speaker 1>They're just not going to listen to us, you know,

0:20:17.076 --> 0:20:18.916
<v Speaker 1>in our view of the world. So who are the

0:20:18.956 --> 0:20:23.396
<v Speaker 1>best messengers? Then people inside their community, people like that

0:20:23.516 --> 0:20:27.556
<v Speaker 1>are best positioned to bring the party back, you know,

0:20:28.076 --> 0:20:32.236
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of respecting the Constitution and away from

0:20:32.236 --> 0:20:35.276
<v Speaker 1>sedition and so. But that presumes an outcome and where

0:20:35.276 --> 0:20:38.956
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party overtime or sometimes sort of returns to

0:20:39.756 --> 0:20:44.676
<v Speaker 1>relative normality, returns to reality, and sometimes parties are so

0:20:44.716 --> 0:20:48.756
<v Speaker 1>split over something fundamental that they break up. I mean,

0:20:48.876 --> 0:20:52.556
<v Speaker 1>the Whig Party before Lincoln, you know, couldn't be contained

0:20:52.636 --> 0:20:56.996
<v Speaker 1>pro slavery and anti slavery factions, you know, which gave

0:20:57.076 --> 0:21:01.036
<v Speaker 1>birth to the Republican Party in the first place. One

0:21:01.156 --> 0:21:07.356
<v Speaker 1>argument on the other side would be the difference between Romney,

0:21:07.436 --> 0:21:12.036
<v Speaker 1>Ben Sass, Lisa Murky, Liz Cheney even on the one hand,

0:21:12.436 --> 0:21:15.156
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Kevin McCarthy as the leader of the party,

0:21:15.156 --> 0:21:18.476
<v Speaker 1>but all the people who have taken these consistent votes

0:21:18.876 --> 0:21:23.036
<v Speaker 1>on Trump's side, rejecting the legitimacy of the election, that

0:21:23.156 --> 0:21:26.916
<v Speaker 1>that split is you can't bridge that divide, and that

0:21:26.916 --> 0:21:30.636
<v Speaker 1>the party has to split. Either the moderate people leave

0:21:30.716 --> 0:21:33.396
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party and form some new party, or they

0:21:33.476 --> 0:21:36.796
<v Speaker 1>capture the party, in which case the Trump people are

0:21:36.796 --> 0:21:39.956
<v Speaker 1>probably going to leave the party themselves. That would not

0:21:40.036 --> 0:21:43.476
<v Speaker 1>be a bad outcome, if I may say so. I mean,

0:21:43.156 --> 0:21:45.116
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that I believe is the outcome that

0:21:45.156 --> 0:21:49.836
<v Speaker 1>a lot of constitutional Republicans are hoping for. I mean, look,

0:21:49.876 --> 0:21:52.236
<v Speaker 1>if we lived in a political system that had slightly

0:21:52.236 --> 0:21:54.636
<v Speaker 1>different rules, we would have more than one party, more

0:21:54.636 --> 0:21:57.196
<v Speaker 1>than two parties. Sorry, then the Republican Party would have

0:21:57.196 --> 0:21:59.716
<v Speaker 1>already split and we would have a far right party

0:21:59.716 --> 0:22:01.276
<v Speaker 1>and we would have a center right party, which is

0:22:01.276 --> 0:22:04.676
<v Speaker 1>what lots of European countries have. Because of the nature

0:22:04.716 --> 0:22:06.596
<v Speaker 1>of our voting system, it's much more difficult in the

0:22:06.676 --> 0:22:09.836
<v Speaker 1>United States. But but yeah, one outcome well be that

0:22:09.876 --> 0:22:13.356
<v Speaker 1>the party splits and one side of the other wins,

0:22:13.396 --> 0:22:18.436
<v Speaker 1>and our role as outsiders is to help the constitutional

0:22:18.476 --> 0:22:23.836
<v Speaker 1>Republicans win. Where do you see depolarization taking place, even

0:22:23.956 --> 0:22:26.836
<v Speaker 1>on a very small scale. Where do you see this

0:22:27.236 --> 0:22:32.276
<v Speaker 1>culture war divide, our fundamental political divide being bridged in

0:22:32.276 --> 0:22:35.596
<v Speaker 1>the sense of people working together on local issues or

0:22:35.716 --> 0:22:39.996
<v Speaker 1>things they still have shared interest in supporting. So in

0:22:40.036 --> 0:22:44.636
<v Speaker 1>the United States, my sense is that that does take

0:22:44.676 --> 0:22:47.956
<v Speaker 1>place at the local and city level quite a lot.

0:22:49.276 --> 0:22:53.276
<v Speaker 1>That Republicans and Democrats are often capable of working together,

0:22:54.236 --> 0:22:56.876
<v Speaker 1>as I say, whatever it is fixing the potholes or

0:22:56.916 --> 0:22:59.396
<v Speaker 1>fixing the roads. But in fact I often have the

0:22:59.436 --> 0:23:02.956
<v Speaker 1>sense that politics in the US, even state politics, which

0:23:02.996 --> 0:23:08.796
<v Speaker 1>can be quite nasty, but certainly city level, municipal, local politics,

0:23:08.876 --> 0:23:10.876
<v Speaker 1>is a lot better and a lot healthier, and a

0:23:10.916 --> 0:23:14.716
<v Speaker 1>lot more functional than national politics. And precisely because national

0:23:14.756 --> 0:23:17.996
<v Speaker 1>politics has become you know, it's a realm where people

0:23:18.156 --> 0:23:21.996
<v Speaker 1>perform and express their identities, where they choose sides in

0:23:22.036 --> 0:23:25.316
<v Speaker 1>the culture war. When we're talking about pollution in the

0:23:25.356 --> 0:23:30.116
<v Speaker 1>local river, you can get cooperation. Yeah, what what country

0:23:30.316 --> 0:23:33.596
<v Speaker 1>you talked about? Northern Ireland is a place where you

0:23:33.596 --> 0:23:36.116
<v Speaker 1>know you've seen this taking place. What country do you

0:23:36.156 --> 0:23:41.036
<v Speaker 1>think has been the most effective at depolarizing or reducing

0:23:41.436 --> 0:23:47.436
<v Speaker 1>fundamental sectional or cultural tensions. This will sound a little strange,

0:23:47.956 --> 0:23:51.756
<v Speaker 1>but another really interesting example of a place that depolarized

0:23:52.196 --> 0:23:56.436
<v Speaker 1>is actually Canada. As you have all forgotten, there used

0:23:56.436 --> 0:24:00.716
<v Speaker 1>to be a Quebec separates and it had a violent element,

0:24:00.916 --> 0:24:03.436
<v Speaker 1>and it was very angry, and there was a part

0:24:03.476 --> 0:24:05.436
<v Speaker 1>of Quebec that was very embittered. This is the French

0:24:05.436 --> 0:24:09.076
<v Speaker 1>speaking partists that wanted to secede from the rest of Canada.

0:24:09.676 --> 0:24:12.916
<v Speaker 1>And what the Canadians did to solve that problem, it

0:24:12.956 --> 0:24:17.476
<v Speaker 1>took a decade, was they literally divided it up into

0:24:17.516 --> 0:24:21.396
<v Speaker 1>littler issues. They created lots and lots of committees to

0:24:21.476 --> 0:24:25.036
<v Speaker 1>discuss them, the language issue, you know, the residence issue,

0:24:25.116 --> 0:24:28.876
<v Speaker 1>the history issue. They created about three dozen think tanks

0:24:29.076 --> 0:24:33.156
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to justice problem, sent lots of academics to write

0:24:33.156 --> 0:24:36.476
<v Speaker 1>books about it. They involved everybody in the discussion of

0:24:36.516 --> 0:24:40.396
<v Speaker 1>every detail, and I'm telling you, everyone got so bored

0:24:40.436 --> 0:24:44.876
<v Speaker 1>of it. It became the most tedious subject, and everyone

0:24:44.956 --> 0:24:48.116
<v Speaker 1>knew the ins and out so well that the thing

0:24:48.276 --> 0:24:52.356
<v Speaker 1>diffused itself. It became boring. Once it wasn't my identity

0:24:52.396 --> 0:24:56.276
<v Speaker 1>as a French Canadian versus your identity as an English Canadian.

0:24:56.636 --> 0:24:59.436
<v Speaker 1>And once it was about what language do we speak

0:24:59.436 --> 0:25:02.756
<v Speaker 1>in elementary school and what percentage of signs have to

0:25:02.796 --> 0:25:05.516
<v Speaker 1>be in which language. Once it was at the needy,

0:25:05.516 --> 0:25:11.076
<v Speaker 1>gritty level of policy level, it became much less interesting

0:25:11.116 --> 0:25:13.836
<v Speaker 1>and people were much less angry about it, and a

0:25:13.876 --> 0:25:16.636
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems turned out to be solvable. It's a

0:25:16.636 --> 0:25:20.916
<v Speaker 1>really interesting comparison because the Kabaqua were poorer than the

0:25:20.956 --> 0:25:24.956
<v Speaker 1>average Canadians. They you know, they felt culturally oppressed, and

0:25:24.996 --> 0:25:28.636
<v Speaker 1>it was a nationalistic movement and you know, while not

0:25:28.996 --> 0:25:32.476
<v Speaker 1>directly comparable to Trumpism in certain respects, it was a

0:25:32.516 --> 0:25:38.396
<v Speaker 1>similar sector of society making demands against what they thought

0:25:38.436 --> 0:25:42.236
<v Speaker 1>as an elite that was oppressing them in cultural terms. Yeah,

0:25:42.396 --> 0:25:45.036
<v Speaker 1>it's a that's a good comparison. And there's alsoays, you know,

0:25:45.036 --> 0:25:47.156
<v Speaker 1>an urban rural split, which is a little bit what

0:25:47.236 --> 0:25:49.716
<v Speaker 1>we have in America too. Although you have to be

0:25:49.796 --> 0:25:53.436
<v Speaker 1>very careful with these stereotypes. There was a very very

0:25:53.436 --> 0:25:57.396
<v Speaker 1>good survey done that looked very closely at the nearly

0:25:57.396 --> 0:26:00.036
<v Speaker 1>two hundred people who are at the Capitol who have

0:26:00.116 --> 0:26:02.316
<v Speaker 1>been arrested, and therefore we have their identify you know,

0:26:02.356 --> 0:26:04.836
<v Speaker 1>we know who they are and they have and it

0:26:04.876 --> 0:26:07.636
<v Speaker 1>turns out that many of them are not the stereotype

0:26:07.636 --> 0:26:09.596
<v Speaker 1>of the Trumper who you think they are. They were

0:26:09.596 --> 0:26:12.236
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily from red states. They were often from blue

0:26:12.236 --> 0:26:15.956
<v Speaker 1>states where they felt themselves to be embattled minorities. They

0:26:15.956 --> 0:26:18.076
<v Speaker 1>were often middle class. Quite a lot of them run

0:26:18.156 --> 0:26:22.196
<v Speaker 1>small companies and small businesses, interestingly, small businesses badly affected

0:26:22.196 --> 0:26:24.916
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic. In some cases they were middle aged.

0:26:24.956 --> 0:26:28.276
<v Speaker 1>They were middle class. They certainly had enough money to

0:26:28.316 --> 0:26:31.276
<v Speaker 1>travel to Washington's, stay in hotels, and show up at

0:26:31.276 --> 0:26:34.236
<v Speaker 1>the capital, so they were not It is wrong to

0:26:34.316 --> 0:26:37.796
<v Speaker 1>think of this group as as the poorest Americans. I mean,

0:26:37.836 --> 0:26:41.716
<v Speaker 1>they most certainly are not. Absolutely Now, one thing that

0:26:41.836 --> 0:26:45.076
<v Speaker 1>is obviously different from the circumstances we were just talking

0:26:45.116 --> 0:26:50.156
<v Speaker 1>about in Colombia and Quebec and even Northern Ireland is

0:26:51.476 --> 0:26:55.076
<v Speaker 1>the role media in particularly social media. I don't think

0:26:55.116 --> 0:26:59.156
<v Speaker 1>in any of those situations you had the equivalent of

0:26:59.196 --> 0:27:03.116
<v Speaker 1>the kind of partisan media driving the distinction for sort

0:27:03.156 --> 0:27:05.476
<v Speaker 1>of fun and profit the way Fox News does, or

0:27:05.516 --> 0:27:08.796
<v Speaker 1>obviously Facebook at the scale it is now as a

0:27:08.836 --> 0:27:14.156
<v Speaker 1>way for people to isolate themselves in their own viewpoint

0:27:14.316 --> 0:27:18.796
<v Speaker 1>and kind of create, you know, self sustaining cults impervious

0:27:18.796 --> 0:27:21.836
<v Speaker 1>to information from the outside. What. I know you've thought

0:27:21.876 --> 0:27:24.316
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this. What do you think the way

0:27:24.916 --> 0:27:28.756
<v Speaker 1>is of coping with the media impact in the other

0:27:28.836 --> 0:27:32.876
<v Speaker 1>direction promoting polarization so, first of all, the phenomenon of

0:27:33.116 --> 0:27:36.636
<v Speaker 1>very partisan media was not unknown, and in the societies

0:27:36.636 --> 0:27:38.916
<v Speaker 1>we've been discussing, that's a familiar one. But you're right

0:27:38.996 --> 0:27:42.996
<v Speaker 1>that the phenomenon of social media and actually the Internet

0:27:42.996 --> 0:27:45.396
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, because it's really not just Facebook, it's a

0:27:45.436 --> 0:27:49.476
<v Speaker 1>broader phenomenon, is a new one. And what's different about

0:27:49.516 --> 0:27:52.036
<v Speaker 1>it is that it really does allow people to live

0:27:52.076 --> 0:27:54.996
<v Speaker 1>in alternate realities. I mean, you can live online, you

0:27:55.036 --> 0:27:59.516
<v Speaker 1>can get all of you know, your sense of who

0:27:59.556 --> 0:28:03.356
<v Speaker 1>you are online, your identity. You can become very popular

0:28:03.396 --> 0:28:05.796
<v Speaker 1>and be liked online by people you don't even know

0:28:05.876 --> 0:28:07.756
<v Speaker 1>in real life. And you can get all kinds of

0:28:08.036 --> 0:28:12.436
<v Speaker 1>sense of pleasure, connection and approval you know online that

0:28:12.476 --> 0:28:14.116
<v Speaker 1>you can't get in the real world. And so it

0:28:14.156 --> 0:28:17.036
<v Speaker 1>has a that is a very important and very it

0:28:17.076 --> 0:28:22.516
<v Speaker 1>does play very toxic and complicated role. I am very

0:28:21.996 --> 0:28:26.476
<v Speaker 1>um you know, I believe very deeply in um in

0:28:26.516 --> 0:28:29.996
<v Speaker 1>both in the possibility and the necessity of social media regulation.

0:28:30.116 --> 0:28:32.756
<v Speaker 1>I am actually writing about it right now. It's a

0:28:32.796 --> 0:28:35.916
<v Speaker 1>big project. Though I would like to stress that this

0:28:35.676 --> 0:28:39.516
<v Speaker 1>is the real question is not about content, and you

0:28:39.556 --> 0:28:42.436
<v Speaker 1>know who's going to decide, you know, whether the president

0:28:42.476 --> 0:28:44.476
<v Speaker 1>gets to have a Twitter feed or not, and you know,

0:28:44.556 --> 0:28:47.556
<v Speaker 1>or who's going to regulate what content Facebook puts up?

0:28:48.036 --> 0:28:51.276
<v Speaker 1>The real questions are much deeper, you know, is there

0:28:51.316 --> 0:28:55.156
<v Speaker 1>a way to regulate the algorithms that decide who sees

0:28:55.196 --> 0:28:58.836
<v Speaker 1>what and that that enable make it possible for people

0:28:58.956 --> 0:29:02.516
<v Speaker 1>to live in alternate realities? You know? Can we imagine

0:29:02.596 --> 0:29:05.396
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of social media, you know, sort of public

0:29:05.436 --> 0:29:09.996
<v Speaker 1>service social media, a BBC of social media that could

0:29:09.996 --> 0:29:12.876
<v Speaker 1>at least offer some people alternatives so that there are

0:29:12.876 --> 0:29:16.316
<v Speaker 1>ways to connect with people whose rules are transparent and

0:29:16.436 --> 0:29:19.236
<v Speaker 1>open in the way that we would like democratic debate

0:29:19.276 --> 0:29:22.196
<v Speaker 1>to be prints and open and are not where the

0:29:22.916 --> 0:29:26.796
<v Speaker 1>Facebook engineers aren't experimenting on us all the time to

0:29:26.876 --> 0:29:30.436
<v Speaker 1>find out which algorithm keeps us on the site longer

0:29:30.516 --> 0:29:34.116
<v Speaker 1>or makes us like the site longer. Creating an Internet

0:29:34.196 --> 0:29:39.716
<v Speaker 1>that reflects democratic values and the values of that prioritize

0:29:39.916 --> 0:29:44.756
<v Speaker 1>rational conversation and civic debate and civic virtues is a

0:29:44.916 --> 0:29:48.556
<v Speaker 1>really big and important long term project for the United

0:29:48.596 --> 0:29:51.956
<v Speaker 1>States and actually for all democracies. And it's my contention

0:29:51.996 --> 0:29:54.196
<v Speaker 1>that it is the thing that we could work on

0:29:54.276 --> 0:29:57.356
<v Speaker 1>together with other democracies because the same debate is happening

0:29:57.356 --> 0:29:59.596
<v Speaker 1>in other countries. I mean, it's happening in England. It's happening,

0:29:59.596 --> 0:30:03.396
<v Speaker 1>and the European Union, which actually has some regulation on

0:30:03.436 --> 0:30:05.516
<v Speaker 1>the books now that will come into effect in the

0:30:05.516 --> 0:30:08.076
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, which will begin to do some

0:30:08.116 --> 0:30:12.516
<v Speaker 1>real regulation of social media along these precise lines. Once

0:30:12.556 --> 0:30:15.876
<v Speaker 1>we're past the immediate emergency of the pandemic and the

0:30:15.916 --> 0:30:20.196
<v Speaker 1>economic collapse. I really hope that Congress can find some

0:30:20.276 --> 0:30:24.676
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth to focus on this, because it's the technology can

0:30:24.716 --> 0:30:27.836
<v Speaker 1>be solved. There are ways in which we could do

0:30:27.876 --> 0:30:31.436
<v Speaker 1>this regulation. There are teams of their academics who are

0:30:31.436 --> 0:30:33.956
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, their proposals to be made. But what

0:30:34.036 --> 0:30:36.356
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been until now has been the real will

0:30:36.396 --> 0:30:38.556
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I mean it's almost like, you know,

0:30:38.596 --> 0:30:42.116
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen nineties and the monopolists were in charge of

0:30:42.156 --> 0:30:45.836
<v Speaker 1>the railroads and the banks and the oil companies, and

0:30:45.956 --> 0:30:49.436
<v Speaker 1>everybody you know sat around and said, well, that's too bad.

0:30:49.476 --> 0:30:51.396
<v Speaker 1>It's really a pity that there are all these monopolies.

0:30:51.436 --> 0:30:53.196
<v Speaker 1>But there's really just nothing we can do about it,

0:30:53.556 --> 0:30:56.716
<v Speaker 1>because that's just you know, that's just reality. And that

0:30:56.796 --> 0:30:59.596
<v Speaker 1>wasn't true. I mean, it was possible to reform the monopolies,

0:30:59.596 --> 0:31:02.116
<v Speaker 1>and it was possible to create anti trust law, and

0:31:02.196 --> 0:31:05.996
<v Speaker 1>it was possible to make capitalism more civilized. You know

0:31:06.196 --> 0:31:09.436
<v Speaker 1>that in that era. And it is possible to change

0:31:09.436 --> 0:31:11.116
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the Internet. I mean, the Internet has

0:31:11.236 --> 0:31:14.436
<v Speaker 1>changed over time and evolved because of decisions that people

0:31:14.596 --> 0:31:17.036
<v Speaker 1>have made, both in the government and outside the government.

0:31:17.396 --> 0:31:20.396
<v Speaker 1>And we can change it again. I mean, there are

0:31:20.436 --> 0:31:23.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's our internet. You know, our rules and

0:31:23.276 --> 0:31:27.636
<v Speaker 1>our laws and our regulations can shape it. I do

0:31:27.756 --> 0:31:31.156
<v Speaker 1>hope that our political leaders come to see that quickly.

0:31:32.116 --> 0:31:36.236
<v Speaker 1>And my favorite last question is always what individuals our

0:31:36.276 --> 0:31:40.916
<v Speaker 1>listeners can do, and particularly around this question of your

0:31:40.996 --> 0:31:46.116
<v Speaker 1>idea of finding common ground not on the big questions,

0:31:46.196 --> 0:31:51.036
<v Speaker 1>but on some smaller, local type issues with people they

0:31:51.116 --> 0:31:54.356
<v Speaker 1>might strongly disagree with. What are ways to pursue that,

0:31:54.516 --> 0:31:56.916
<v Speaker 1>I think for people who are maybe have a little

0:31:56.916 --> 0:31:59.316
<v Speaker 1>more equanimity that I do at this stage, or you know,

0:31:59.396 --> 0:32:01.876
<v Speaker 1>maybe I will in six months, But you know, what

0:32:01.956 --> 0:32:05.156
<v Speaker 1>are some ways to get involved in things that you

0:32:05.196 --> 0:32:10.196
<v Speaker 1>think will have that kind of soothing effect. So look

0:32:10.316 --> 0:32:17.756
<v Speaker 1>for organizations that have mixed membership, charities or local NGOs,

0:32:18.356 --> 0:32:21.276
<v Speaker 1>local municipal organizations that you can work with where you'll

0:32:21.276 --> 0:32:24.836
<v Speaker 1>be in contact with people who have different ideas from you,

0:32:24.956 --> 0:32:28.196
<v Speaker 1>or who have a different political orientation from you. I mean,

0:32:28.236 --> 0:32:31.116
<v Speaker 1>it's always a useful thing to do. And of course,

0:32:31.196 --> 0:32:33.476
<v Speaker 1>even as I'm advising this, I realize how hard that

0:32:33.516 --> 0:32:36.396
<v Speaker 1>can be depending on what community you live in. People

0:32:36.436 --> 0:32:40.676
<v Speaker 1>that you know or people who are whose orientation is

0:32:40.716 --> 0:32:44.236
<v Speaker 1>different from you seek ways to communicate with them. And

0:32:44.436 --> 0:32:47.476
<v Speaker 1>by the way, people who are caught up in the

0:32:47.556 --> 0:32:51.236
<v Speaker 1>QAnon cult think very hard about how to help them

0:32:51.276 --> 0:32:53.676
<v Speaker 1>get out of it, because that's a that's a that's

0:32:53.676 --> 0:32:57.316
<v Speaker 1>a much more dangerous and insidious version in a version

0:32:57.316 --> 0:33:01.876
<v Speaker 1>of this problem. Generally speaking, finding ways yourself personally to

0:33:02.036 --> 0:33:05.036
<v Speaker 1>engage with people on the other side of the political

0:33:05.076 --> 0:33:09.716
<v Speaker 1>spectrum is you know, can only be useful. It sounds

0:33:09.716 --> 0:33:13.996
<v Speaker 1>like good advice to me. And thanks for the conversation today,

0:33:13.996 --> 0:33:18.876
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jacob. That was the historian and journalist Anne Applebaumb

0:33:19.196 --> 0:33:21.436
<v Speaker 1>she's also, as you know, a co host of this show.

0:33:22.236 --> 0:33:24.556
<v Speaker 1>I hope that conversation sets the table as it were

0:33:24.636 --> 0:33:27.036
<v Speaker 1>for the weeks ahead, as Anna and I continue to

0:33:27.116 --> 0:33:31.276
<v Speaker 1>explore aspects of the problem with other guests. Today, we

0:33:31.396 --> 0:33:33.716
<v Speaker 1>briefly touched on the role of social media and all this.

0:33:34.516 --> 0:33:37.836
<v Speaker 1>Solvable will continue next week with an in depth conversation

0:33:38.156 --> 0:33:41.236
<v Speaker 1>with the man who invented the term filter bubble, tech

0:33:41.396 --> 0:33:45.996
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur and social activist, Eli Pariser. We'll discuss how social

0:33:45.996 --> 0:33:49.756
<v Speaker 1>media platforms are contributing to our political and cultural rifts.

0:33:50.396 --> 0:33:53.516
<v Speaker 1>We'll also explore ways to rethink the digital worlds we

0:33:53.596 --> 0:33:58.356
<v Speaker 1>participate in. One idea Pariser suggests is for digital designers

0:33:58.516 --> 0:34:02.116
<v Speaker 1>to think more like successful urban planners. I hope you'll

0:34:02.196 --> 0:34:06.676
<v Speaker 1>join us for that conversation. Solvable is produced by Jocelyn Frank,

0:34:06.876 --> 0:34:10.436
<v Speaker 1>research in booking by Lisa don Our managing producer is

0:34:10.516 --> 0:34:14.116
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Girardot, and our executive producer of Pushkin is Mia Lobel.

0:34:14.756 --> 0:34:18.396
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks this week to Heather Fain, John Schnarros, Carley mcgliori,

0:34:18.516 --> 0:34:23.036
<v Speaker 1>Christina Sullivan, Eric Sandler, Maggie Taylor, Emily Rothstak, Maya Koenig,

0:34:23.156 --> 0:34:27.076
<v Speaker 1>and Kadisha Holland. Solvable is a production of Pushkin Industries.

0:34:27.316 --> 0:34:30.156
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please remember to share, rate

0:34:30.236 --> 0:34:32.676
<v Speaker 1>and review us really helps to get the word out.

0:34:33.436 --> 0:34:36.876
<v Speaker 1>You can find Pushkin podcasts wherever you listen, including on

0:34:36.956 --> 0:34:41.196
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app and Apple podcasts. I'm Jacob Weisberg.