WEBVTT - US Retail Sales, Netflix Preview

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>a look at US retail sales and what that data

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>point may mean for Federal reserve policy moving forward. I'm

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stephen Carolyn London. But we're looking ahead to the

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>UK's new Prime minister hosting his neighbors for a meeting

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of the European political community.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 3>to China's Third Plan of and whether it's steady as

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>she goes on policy or surprising new developments.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Eleve Them three Own New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 4>DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen and around

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 4>the world on Bloemberg Radio dot com and via the

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>today's program with US retail sales for June. That data

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>out on Tuesday morning, eight thirty am Wall Street Time.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>And after more signs that inflation is cooling, how might

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that move the needle for FED policy going forward? Well,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>for more, we're joined by Estello, us economist with Bloomberg Economics. Well, Estelle,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>after two months in a row of pretty lackluster retail spending,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>what is your outlook for retail sales in June.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 5>We're actually expecting another month of very weak retail sales

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 5>for June. We're expecting the headline retails print to print

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 5>at negative zero point three percent. We're expecting the more

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 5>important control group retail sales figure, that's the retail sales

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 5>figure that strips out more of the volatile components of

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 5>the retail sales data, to print at zero percent. So

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 5>that's flat reading of retail sales. Now, the negative zero

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 5>point three percent headline retail sales reading we're expecting partially

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 5>reflects a really sharp decline in auto sales in the

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 5>month of June. Now, part of this is reflective of

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the fact that a lot of auto dealers in the

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 5>month of June saw a cyber attack on the software

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 5>that they use to process sales, so that affected the

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.559
<v Speaker 5>top line sales figures we saw in June for automobiles

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 5>and may not actually be reflective of a sharp pullback

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 5>in consumer spending, but that's in the data. So that's

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 5>why we're forecasting a negative numbering you mentioned that we've

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 5>already had two consecutive months of week retail sales prints.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 5>If our forecast for the June retail sales is correct,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 5>it's going to show that consumer spending is very much

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 5>a slowing trend. And what that mainly is reflecting is

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that consumers are very much feeling the pressure from the

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 5>Federal Reserve's high interest rates. The Fed is very much

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 5>waiting to have more confidence that inflation is going towards

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 5>this two percent target. And how consumer spending plays into

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 5>that is that as we see consumers being stressed about

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 5>by high interest rates, they're pulling back spending and a

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of retailers are reacting to that by lowering prices.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we talk about the prices, because we have

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>seen airfares go down, we have seen used car prices

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 2>go down. Auto insurance of course still you know significantly higher,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>but we did see there is some hope for consumers.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>We saw a significant slow down in inflation in June.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Now most of that on housing costs and rents, but

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>that's a big part of household budgets. How will that

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>impact people spending?

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>As health process come down, that's going to free up

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 5>a little more disposable income for consumers. It's going to

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 5>ease off the pressure on consumers, but overall, it's not

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 5>going to change the fact that consumers are feeling a

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 5>little less flushed compared to prior to the pandemic. So

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 5>over the past you know, six months, consumers have been

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 5>spending more than their incomes have been growing. And as

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 5>the label market cools further, we're expected to consumers to

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 5>feel a little more cautious about their spending, even if

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 5>their other household costs are coming down.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>But at least there is hope.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>There is hope and a lot of talk now, especially

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>after last week's inflation data, that in September, when we

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of back to schools spending, we have

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of new cars coming on dealership lots that

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 2>if there is a rate cut from the FED, and

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>it was a pretty dubbish tone last week in annual

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 2>testimony by Chairman Powell to Congress that we really could

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, signal a real boost for the US consumer

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>through the end of this year.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Though, well, that's not how we're looking at things right now.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 6>So basically we still have expectations for our VET cut

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.799
<v Speaker 6>in September. But usually if you look at his historical data,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 6>it takes time for consumers to feel confident again. If

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 6>you look at the underlying drivers of consumer spending, consumers

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 6>usually spend when they feel like their income can support it,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 6>and income growth is supported by a strong labor market.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>Right now, even if the FED cuts in September, we're

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 6>still expecting labor market to slow and consumers to not

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 6>feel at support from a FED cut until late twenty.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, June retail sales data out Tuesday morning. That's

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 2>ahead of Wall Street's opening bell and our thanks to Estello,

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>us economist with Bloomberg Economics. All right, we move next

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 2>to corporate earnings and streaming giant Netflix posting its latest

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 2>quarterly results this Thursday. Key for investors how the companies

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>multiple growth levers like live comedy shows, live sporting events.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 2>It's ad supported tier and subscription price hikes has impacted

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 2>revenue and for all that and more. We're joined by

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Githa ragenathin Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on US media. Well, getha,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>what are you expecting to see from Netflix?

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 7>Tom?

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 8>We are really expecting a blockbuster quarter. So if you

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 8>just look at Netflix's performance over the past few months,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 8>I would say Netflix is firing on all cylinders. The

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 8>company is in the strongest position that it's ever been,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 8>I think fundamentally, I think competitively as well as financially.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 8>We continue to see very good subscriber momentum. Remember they

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 8>added something like nine point three million subscribers in the

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 8>first quarter. Obviously, we don't expect the same level of

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 8>subscriber gains in the second quarter, but we think it's

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 8>going to be fairly strong. We think it's going to

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 8>be close to almost six million. And that's on the

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 8>back of a lot of initiatives that the company has introduced.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 8>So they have this widespread password crackdown, and of course

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 8>they have this new ad supported tier, which we think

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 8>has been working really well for them.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>And are the subscriber adds global? How are they doing

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in the US and how are they doing elsewhere?

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 8>They're actually surprisingly strong tom in the US. And remember

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 8>the US is a fairly saturated market, and we're still

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 8>seeing pretty pretty good growth. Remember Netflix now actually at

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 8>about eighty million subscribers, actually has more subscribers than the

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 8>traditional TV bundles. So Netflix has very much become the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 8>go to option, and if you're thinking about TV viewing,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 8>Netflix really is the first choice and is the anchor

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 8>I would say for most consumers when it comes to

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 8>the living room. So we're seeing very good growth in

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 8>the US, given that it's a saturated market, but obviously

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 8>majority of the growth still comes from the international markets.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk about some of these newer initiatives from Netflix.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Christmas Day may never be the same again, right with

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>this deal to stream live NFL games, And we saw

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>this John Mulaney, Everyone's in LA five or six live shows,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>comedy shows. It's all about something Netflix has never done before, right,

0:07:58.400 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Advertising revenue.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 8>Oh absolutely, I mean this is where I think investors

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 8>are getting really really excited about the future potential for

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 8>this company, because we know subscription growth, we know they've

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 8>really kind of delivered on subscription growth, but advertising is

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 8>a whole new area for them, and they are really

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 8>doing things to kind of really boost that revenue. So

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 8>they've moved into live event sports programming.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 7>In a huge way, obviously with this NFL deal.

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 8>Obviously that's going to be something very very attractive to advertisers,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 8>especially since the advertising subscription tier is priced very economically,

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 8>very competitively at seven dollars a month, So we think

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people will sign on. And they're doing

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 8>lots of different things, as you just pointed out, obviously

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 8>the comedy shows.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 7>You had the Tom Brady roast.

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have a Mike Tyson Versus Jake Paul

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 8>event that is coming up sometime in November. So they're

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 8>doing a lot of things in terms of content, really

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 8>kind of broadening their content appeal quite aggressively.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>And when I turn on Netflix, which I have at home,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I see a lot more international shows and some of

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>them have been tremendous hits here in the US, whatever

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 2>language they're in. It's incredible how this growth is everywhere.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 8>Oh absolutely, And you know that is translating into revenue growth,

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 8>that is translating into subscriber growth, but most importantly, Tom,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 8>that is translating into engagement. And really this is something

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 8>that Netflix has been driving home now for so many quarters,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 8>so many years. They want to see people come to

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 8>their platform and then never leave the platform, because that

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 8>is how they can get to upsell so many more

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, new products, whether it's gaming, whether it's advertising,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 8>as they kind of expand into new categories. And we're

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 8>seeing that engagement is very very strong for Netflix, and

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 8>of course a lot of local language content is definitely helping.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 8>So just in the second quarter, we saw you know,

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 8>of course, Bridgerton was the most watched show, but we

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 8>also saw some of you know, the Korean language dramas

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 8>Queen of Tears for instance, performing very very well, and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 8>we're probably going to see more of that as Quid Game.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 8>The second season of Squid Game comes out a little

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 8>bit later this year.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, also, Netflix, the success of all these shows, the

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>success you know, the revenue streams they have, it has

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 2>forced other streamers to look for partnerships just to compete

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>even close to the level of Netflix.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and that actually works so well for for Netflix,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 8>tom because you know, obviously, originally they were investing very

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 8>very heavily in you know, their own content, with what

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 8>we call original content. But now we're seeing a much

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 8>more kind of balanced mix, and when they go for

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 8>more licensed content, we see the effects in terms of

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 8>the bottom line because it's it's much cheaper, you know,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 8>it's it's content that kind of travels well. It is

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 8>time tested content, and obviously we're seeing free cash flow

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 8>and operating profit get a huge boost from them being

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 8>far more rational when it comes to content costs. So

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 8>it's really kind of not only helping them kind of

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 8>build their competitive mode getting all these content titles from

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 8>other producers of content, but it is also kind of

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 8>helping them actually strengthen their bottom line.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>It's big in a bottom line. Those shares of Netflix

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>up about forty percent so far this year. Where do

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>you think it heads for the remainder of twenty twenty four.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 8>So I think, you know, we're going to see continued

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 8>momentum and we're seeing.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 7>That with on the subscriber side.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 8>But I think the real big catalyst that could potentially

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 8>happen in the second half of the year is a

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 8>price increase. So we have not seen Netflix increase their

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 8>prices on the standard tier, which is the fifteen dollars

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 8>fifty cent standard product that they offer in the United States.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 8>We haven't seen them increased prices on that tier now

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 8>for almost about two years, so they're definitely due for

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 8>a price increase. And we've seen price increases across the board.

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 8>We've seen it at Spotify, We've seen it, you know,

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 8>at Max, a lot of the rival services are increasing

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, prices. So just kind of given Netflix's low

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 8>rates of churn, we definitely think that they are going

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 8>to raise their prices very soon. And as we see

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, those price increases returned to kind of the

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 8>normal cadence. Netflix obviously then has ample room to sustain

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 8>double digit annual revenue growth and obviously huge levels of

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 8>operating margin expansion.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 2>Earnings for second quarter out this Thursday for Netflix. Our

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Getha raghanoffin Bloomberg Intelligence analysts on US media.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we look ahead

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to the UK's new Prime Minister hosting his neighbors for

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a meeting of the European political community. I'm Tom Busby,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Up later on our program, we look ahead to a

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>major policy meeting for top officials in China, but first,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the European Political Community Meeting takes place in the UK

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>this week, as Keir Starmer, the country's newly elected Prime Minister,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>brings dozens of high level lawmakers from across Europe together

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>discussing shared challenges like Russia's war against Ukraine illegal immigration,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>even as many of those leaders face political challenges in

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 2>their own countries. For more, let's go to London and

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor Stephen Carroll.

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom In only his second week as Prime Minister, Keir

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Starmer will host European leaders at Blenham Palace for the

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth European Political Community Meeting. The EPCs a forum for

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>European Union countries and their neighbors to meet. It's twice

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>yearly gatherings are hosted alternately by a country that's in

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the EU and one that isn't. Choosing the Oxfordshire stately

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>home as the backdrop for these discussions may itself be

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>an indication of Starmer's in tensions. Known as the birthplace

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister may be hoping to

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>draw inspiration from Britain's revered wartime leader. The plight of

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is likely to be high on the agenda in discussions,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>especially following the Russian bombing of a children's hospital in Kiev,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but domestic tensions in other countries may overshadow these talks.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>In France, President Macron remains in a vulnerable position after

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>his Centrist alliance lost its relative majority in the country's

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>recent parliamentary elections. In Germany, Chancellor Olaf Schultz's position has

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been weakened by a bruising defeat in last months European

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Parliament vote. In fact, Kirs Starmer cuts a rare figure

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as a leader with a clear mandate and

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>majority ready to implement his agenda. The UK Prime Minister's

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>approach to foreign and defense policy is something that we've

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>been discussing with Jamie She, associate fellow at Chatham House

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and a former NATO official. He started by offering his

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on Kiir Starmer's assertion that Ukraine can use British

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>missiles to strike targets inside Russia.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's obviously good news for President's Vilenski

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 9>because clearly at the time when Theussians have been massing

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 9>their forces just on their side of the border for

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 9>their offensives which have been taking place as you can

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 9>see in the Dombas region up near Kharkiv. If Ukraine

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 9>is going to really be able to defend itself, it

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 9>has to be able to strike the Russian fuel dumps,

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 9>the Russian storage facilities, their command and control, their communications,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 9>their headquarters on Russian territory to disrupt their offensive preparations.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine has also had some success in attacking Russian airfields,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 9>taking out some Russian strategic bombers very far away from

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 9>the Russian Ukraine border, and also those Russian fuel and

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 9>energy facilities that I was referring to earlier. So I

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 9>think Kairstarma has given President of Lanski a shot of

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 9>the arms to the extent and obviously, if Russia believes

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 9>it has full license from Russia to attack anything it

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 9>likes in Ukraine, the Ukrainian's cause of self defense have

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 9>to be able to strike back against the significant Russian

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 9>military targets, but obviously not Russian civilian targets. I think

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 9>Kiyostarma and other NATO leaders will draw a redline on

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 9>that the strikes have to be against the genuine military targets.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Does this though, on the question of striking military targets

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>open up divisions between the US and what France and

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK are now saying about the use of weapons

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to strike military targets inside Russia.

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, since the beginning of the war, the Europeans have

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 9>often been out ahead of the United States in minery space.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 9>For example, they decided the UK to provide tanks first,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 9>a long time before the United States decided to do

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 9>the same. Similarly, with these long range artillery, these cruise

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 9>missilesy storm Shadows or the French scalps that we're talking

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 9>about now, the Europeans, with the Dutch and Danes, were

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 9>the first two across the Rubican when it came to

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 9>S sixteen aircraft, and the United States followed. So there

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 9>is often in NATO perception that it's always the Americans

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 9>who are out in front and the Europeans sort of

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 9>follow willy nilly sooner or later. But this time it

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 9>is the other way. But the fact of the matter

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 9>is that Biden has also recently shown a little bit

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 9>of flexibility, allowing the Ukrainians to use the long range

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 9>US attackers artillery shells against the targets on Russian territory,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 9>but Biden has said that he doesn't want these to

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 9>go too deep into Russia. He wants them really to

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 9>be restricted to places like Crimea and just those Russian

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 9>facilities over the border preparing for the offensive which I

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 9>was referring to earlier. So the United States is sort

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 9>of halfway there, but it tends to sort of follow

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 9>where the Europeans lead on this.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 10>One, right, So the big takeaway so far is that

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 10>these NATA allies have promised those five long range air

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 10>defense systems for Ukraine. But is NATO actually doing enough

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 10>for Ukraine to win the war?

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, maybe not enough in the past, because the effort

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 9>was largely left to individual allies acting bilaterally, signing bilateral

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 9>agreements with Ukraine like the one that Rishie sunakas very

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 9>early on with a Kiev and basically giving the Ukrainians

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 9>what they have in their stocks, not always what the

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 9>Ukrainians need on a priority basis. But NATO is now

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 9>stepping up, and I think the big headline from this

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 9>Washington summit is that maybe too late, but still NATO

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 9>is now going to set up a command in Wisbaden

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 9>in Germany with about eight hundred NATO military planners whose

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 9>job it will be now to make this a much

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 9>more coordinated, organized, planned effort. For example, Ukraine is currently

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 9>operating about one hundred and forty different types of weapons

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 9>systems supplied by the West. This doesn't make sense because

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 9>it means one hundred and forty different supply chains, maintenance

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 9>systems and so on doesn't help the Ukrainian war effort.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 9>So I think what NATO is going to do now

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 9>is organized this better in terms of what Ukraine needs,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 9>ensure that the delivery is more timely and more consistent,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 9>reduced these one hundred and forty different systems to say

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 9>twenty or thirty which Ukraine could actually maintain and operate.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 9>And what NATO says also is that this effort is

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 9>going to be a bridge to a future Ukrainian membership

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 9>of the Alliance, because it's not just going to be

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 9>about the short term provision of weapons to Ukraine. It's

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 9>going to also be about the long term restructuring of

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 9>the Ukrainian army to look less like an old Soviet

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 9>army and more like a modern Western army able to

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 9>integrate into NATO in the fullness of time.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>That was Jamie shaef Fro Chatham House speaking to Jamani

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Brassacci and me on Bloomberg Radio. So what's in store

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at this upcoming European political community meeting and will ker

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Starmer be able to charm his EU counterparts into a

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>closer relationship. I've been discussing this and more with Bloomberg's

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>UK Politics editor Alex morales. I started by asking him

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>what Kir Starmer may be hoping to achieve during this event.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, mindful that he's just coming back from the NATO

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 11>summit where he's met a lot of the same people.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this really is about sort of meeting a

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 11>lot of the European leaders who will be working with

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 11>he hopes for the next five or ten years, but

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 11>head to head, face to face, discussing some of the

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 11>issues that they have in common, so you know, some

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 11>of their points of divergence. And he really wants to

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 11>change the tone in the way that the UK develops

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 11>its relationship with the European Union and other more wider

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 11>European countries.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>How much of a test there's going to be for

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>him in his new job as Prime Minister it's his

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>first time hosting such an international summer and it's quite

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, as you say, friends and neighbors, it's.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 11>Quite a lot of leaders. But it's also a sort

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 11>of quite fairly informal summit. They don't have a set

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 11>communicate that they want to agree, so he doesn't have

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 11>a piece of paper that he needs to achieve by

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 11>the end of it.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It really is just.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 11>About, you know, getting that time to speak face to

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 11>face with other leaders and to discuss all these different

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 11>issues that they need to address.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of the things that of course

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we know as a priority for the new Labor government.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>They want better ties with the European Union versus what

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there was under the Conservatives. Does this perhaps provide an

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>opening for care Starmor to make progress on some key issues.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean definitely think. I don't think we'll be

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 11>getting any sort of firm agreements out of it, but

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 11>clearly so one of the big things he wants to

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 11>talk about. We know that he's going there with this

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 11>sort of proposal for fence and security packed with the

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 11>European Union, so yes, he wants to tighten those ties.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 11>But obviously there are a lot of issues like immigration

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 11>he wants to talk about. It's not free movement, but

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 11>he wants to help, for instance, British performing artists to

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 11>be able to tour more freely in Europe. There are

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 11>all these sort of issues which have risen up since

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 11>Brexit where the relationship could just be a lot easier

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 11>and better flowing.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>And how much does there has there been sort of

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a tone shift or could there be a tone shift

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>from the other side of the channel from the closer

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>European partners towards a new government given that it is

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a different party and sort of a fairly significant step

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on from Braxit as well.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's a tough question because certainly Kissed Arm

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 11>wants to set this different tone and I'm sure his

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 11>European counterparts will welcome that change of tone. But at

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 11>the same time Starmer is going to face the same

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 11>issues that the outgoing Conservative government did, which is, for instance,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 11>one of the things he wants is a veterany agreement

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 11>to ease the flow of fresh foods across the borders.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 11>You might still insist on the oversight of the European

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 11>Court Justice over the regulations underpinning that, so you know,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 11>there are these things which have come to be seen

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 11>as toxic in the UK which he will have to

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 11>overcome and try and work out a compromise.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And whether the EU.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 11>Is willing to give him more than they were willing

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 11>to give the previous Conservative government. You know, it's an open.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>An open question. Indeed, the review of the Trade and

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Cooperation Agreement, the Post brags that trade deal not due

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>until twenty twenty six, so this would be sort of

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a speeding up of that process if they were able

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to make these these side agreements. The European political community

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>itself was an interesting idea, was something that was a

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>brainchild of Emmanuel Macron in France. It's only been around

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>since twenty twenty two, and it was sort of meant

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to bridge the gap in relations with countries like the UK,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the nearest neighbors in the community as well. I mean,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the other sorts of things that are expected

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to be under discussion at this event, apart from kars

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Armor trying to make new friends.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, so we've mentioned security defense that seems

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 11>to be the main thing that the government wants to

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 11>talk about. I would imagine immigration would come up. I'd

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 11>be very surprised if it didn't, because it's a shared problem.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 11>You know, you've got these sort of flows of immigrants

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 11>moving across the continent, and you know, in the UK's

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 11>case they come from France, but obviously they've got to

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 11>France somehow through other countries. So immigration's a big topic

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 11>of discussion. Ukraine is clearly a matter of huge importance

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 11>to the continent and how they cooperate on those things,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 11>and then shared problems like energy, security, cybersecurity, climate change,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 11>you know, all of those issues I'm sure will.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Come up and high level discussions on that as well.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>This is also going to be a test of care

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Starmery's government's foreign policy too. It's so first, you know,

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so the second doubting after the nature, so much for

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>them to have a chance to talk about that and

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in a range of subjects broader than just defense

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and security as well. What else do we know as

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a priority for the new UK government when it comes

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to foreign policy, Well.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 11>I would say that the main one is climate change

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 11>that they want to change tone on. So I think

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 11>there's a there's a perception, and I don't know how

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 11>international this perception is that the UK sort of stepped

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 11>back a bit from its climate change policies under Rishi

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 11>Sunax administration, and the incoming Labor government want to change that,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 11>and so they want to say the UK is back

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 11>at the table. You know, we're going to be leading

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 11>on this for the next years and decades to come.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 11>So cutting emissions is obviously going to be one of

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 11>the big things that he brings to.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and look, it's this is also a chance to

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for as you say, there's more face to face conversations

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with some of those European counterparts perhaps and as you

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, a less structured way than we would have

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>seen it the likes of the NATO some blen And

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Palace being chosen as the venue for this event as well.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's of course where the AI s it was too.

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this, you know, a chance for those those very

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>chummy sort of conversations and corridors as well.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean it's it's obviously a nice sort of

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 11>country house setting. I think it's also a very unsubtle

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 11>message that that security is big. It's Winston Winston Church's

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 11>birth place, so that's perhaps a message to putin of

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, here at these forty seven countries We're all

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 11>discussing security and Ukraine and all these matters. This country

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 11>has all this history attached to it.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Bloomberg's UK Politics editor Alex Morales, We'll have

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>more coverage of the European political community meeting on Bloomberg

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio and television in the coming days. I'm Stephen Carroll

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in London. You can catch us every weekday morning here

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning at six am in London

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and one am on Wall Street. Tom.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Stephen, And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>we look ahead to a major policy meeting for China's

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>top officials. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. I'm

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York with your global look ahead

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Top officials in China gathering this week for a major

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 2>policy meeting known as the Third Play For more, let's

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>get to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia hosts Brian Curtis and Doug Krisner.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Tom. The Third Plenum is a chance for China to

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 3>enact far reaching and pivotal policy actions. I think Dungshaoping's

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>reform and opening up back in nineteen seventy eight. That's

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 3>when China essentially opened up to the outside world.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 12>This time, though, it's more likely the party re embraces

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 12>the recent policy guidelines of Chiechen Ping, and specifically his

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 12>call for new productive forces.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>At the core of that strategy are high tech industries

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and high end manufacturing. We're expecting to learn more about

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 3>how China plans to cultivate new long term growth drivers.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 12>So how does the government implement more stimulus and how

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 12>does it address the country's major challenges, challenges that include

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 12>a property crisis, access to foreign markets, and demographics.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>We approached a number of leading economists and policy advisors

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>for their thoughts on what comes next.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 13>For the wishless within is basically more or like market

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 13>friendly or market biases policies, for example, like if they

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 13>could further elevation the role of the market for allocate resources,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 13>or to emphasize the importance of more supported policies for

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 13>the private sectors.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 14>It's kind of a consensus right now. I think the

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 14>major problem in the economy is low sentiment, a loss

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 14>of animal spirit. So I think the third planet first

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 14>and foremost provided government a rare opportunity to tackle the

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 14>lack of confidence by rekindling the gross friendly.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 15>Reforms, there's not much of expectation going into the third Planum.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 15>If you look at the title of the Third Planum,

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 15>it has this continuation sort of in it furthering reforms,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 15>but it's a continuation of the things the party has

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 15>already told us, whether it's on the technology front or

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:00.239
<v Speaker 15>some of the balancing the local government finances.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 16>The start of Planum. I think in enterprise business they

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 16>hope the government could actually start to reprotize the economic

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 16>growth because over the past several years, the government actually

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 16>come into a new policy region where they try to

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 16>balance multiple policy goals, right, so it's no longer just

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 16>about economic growth, but also about financial stability, security, a

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 16>bunch of other objectives. But on the other hand, I

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 16>think the private sector they are really looking for the

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 16>government to they could actually reprodize economic growths or at

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 16>a list step away from some of the regulatory titaning.

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Gracetam there from BNP, parabol Wealth Management, Ding Schwang at

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Standard Chartered Bank, Hoi Shan from Goldman Sachs, and Xian

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Wang from the Vanguard Group for more. Now we're joined

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>in our studios by Rebecca Choan Wilkins, Bloomberg Asia Government

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 3>and Politics correspondent and Jenny Marsh, Bloomberg Team Leader on

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Economics and Government. Rebecca, let me go to you first.

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 3>A common theme there is it cantinuation of She's productive

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 3>forces and then also hopes for improving prospects for the

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 3>private sector. I'd say the former is likely. The latter, well,

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 3>what a bit of hope.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 17>Maybe, I think there will be something for the markets.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 17>I would caution any sense of, you know, reforms that

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 17>go into reviving animal spirits. As one of those economists referenced,

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 17>I think there is a desire to sort of use

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 17>the private sector, use the entrepreneurial class to advance some

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 17>of those key objectives in under the so called New Three,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 17>for example, high tech domains, advanced technology. They want to

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 17>be able to use the private sector to achieve those goals.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 17>I don't really see any signals that they want to

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 17>actually unleash animal spirits, either among the entrepreneurial class or

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 17>among markets to sort of fire power that transition. And

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 17>we also have seen over the years it sort of

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 17>hes since from she warnings over quote unquote barbaric capital,

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 17>disorderly capital There is quite still this emphasis on having

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 17>capital markets be quite ordered and structured in China today.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 12>So, Jenny, it would appear then if we do not

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 12>get kind of a big bang initiative, there's going to

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 12>be a lot of disappointment.

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, And you know, I think disappointment is sort of

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 10>priced in. You know, leading up to the planet we've

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 10>been hearing from investors and economists that they actually don't

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 10>have high expectations for this, And there's a tradition actually

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 10>for Chinese sucks to sort of react to sort of

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 10>quite mutedly after a third penant, like it isn't something

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 10>which historically has sort of really had like a big

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 10>sort of positive effect afterwards. I think it's important to

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 10>bear in mind that, you know, she's going to be

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 10>speaking from sort of a thirty thousand foot view at

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 10>this event, and the communicator get afterwards isn't going to

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 10>have policy specifics, but it's going to have sort of

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 10>language which gives you an idea of the kind of

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 10>policies that she wants to see the bodies and organizations

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 10>underneath him and the Central Committee sort of roll out

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 10>in the months to come.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It's always the case in China, it seems that social

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and political objectives come first, their positioned ahead of business.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 3>That's actually probably true in most countries. However, the lines

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 3>are drawn slightly differently in China. It seems much more

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>palpable in China journey.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 10>Why, I think because of the way that the government

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 10>is set up, and you know, I think what's interesting

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 10>about the third Panem is this is the first one

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 10>of these sort of major, you know, twice a decade

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 10>events on reform since she consolidated power in twenty twenty two. Previously,

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 10>when he went into these events, he was sort of

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 10>having much more sort of balanced different factions, and you know,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 10>at the beginning, when he had his first plane in

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 10>twenty thirteen, he was sort of, you know, the first

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 10>among equals on the standing committee. He goes into this

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 10>event having consolidated power, and now maybe what will be

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 10>different about this event is that we will see what

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 10>she's sort of raw vision for the economy is when

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 10>he gets to do exactly what he wants to do.

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 10>So I think, you know, that's something that we might

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 10>see differently because of how the balance of power in

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 10>China has shifted even more in recent years towards she

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 10>sort of personalizing power around his rule.

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 12>Rebecca, what about measures to reduce things like inequality and

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 12>tackle even the demographic challenges that we've been talking about

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 12>with respect to China.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I think that's a really important one that people

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 17>are looking out for. You know, we hear a lot

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 17>of stories about people on the ground worried about sort

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 17>of financial security, worried about job cuts, pay cuts. We

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 17>hear anecdotes about, you know, civil servants having to repay

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 17>their bonuses that they were given from the past five years.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 17>So for some in China, you know, prospects are looking

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 17>pretty grim. And while incomes are still growing, they're growing

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 17>at their slowest pace under she Jimping since the late

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 17>nineteen eighties, So the landscape has really changed quite fundamentally.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 17>I don't think there are enormous expectations though, that we

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 17>are going to see sort of some kind of grand reform.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 17>I do think there is some expectation we might see

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 17>something in, for example, reform for the welfare system, something

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 17>in the Hookoh registration system, something in public services to

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 17>help local governments improve their public services. But in terms

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 17>of sort of big bang changes that address or of

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 17>fundamental issues of social inequality. I think probably expectations are

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 17>relatively muted. It's a really interesting survey released by CSIS

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 17>as well as academics from Harvard and Stanford recently that

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 17>show in twenty twenty three, essentially more people are attributing

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 17>declines in the ability to get rich or in fact

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 17>the reasons to get poor in sort of economic structural reasons.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 17>So they put it down to things like you can

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 17>get rich if you come from a wealthy family or

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 17>if you have connections. That's a big change from two

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 17>decades ago, when the emphasis was more on your talent,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 17>your ability, and a higher education. So we've seen that

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.719
<v Speaker 17>actual sort of perception of inequality and who's to blame

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 17>really change over the past thirty years.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 7>In China.

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because when we look at the private sector,

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 3>we understand that there's huge competition between or among different

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 3>players there. The competition is ferce in artificial intelligence, for instance,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 3>we hear that some companies are just not going to

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to easily get ahead, even a company like Baidu,

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>which is one of the early movers in that space.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 3>And yet we hear when we talk to economists about,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, trying to stimulate the private sector that people

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 3>are calling for a more level playing field. How do

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 3>we reconcile those two notions.

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 17>Well, I think there is a sort of contradiction here

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 17>in terms of which part of the private sector are

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 17>you really talking about vamping up, right? And I think

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 17>the sort of era where entrepreneurs believe that, you know,

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 17>a whole wider range of opportunities could create wealth and

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 17>in fact that was something desirable has probably that sentiment

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 17>is still really dented by the fallout of the crackdown

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 17>on the tech sector, for example, on the education sector.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 17>People who crude enormous amounts of wealth, we're essentially targeted

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 17>for that, right, And so that we are sort of

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 17>seeing a shift away from that type of sort of

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 17>entrepreneurialism into these very targeted areas that align with government objectives.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 17>And in some of those areas, you know things like

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 17>AI as well as evs. More obviously, those green tech

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 17>areas do receive support, extraditional support, policy support, in some

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 17>cases funding support to.

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 12>Grow Jenny, I'm curious when we use the term new

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 12>productive forces, how much of that is reliant on a

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 12>change in the way China has been thinking about research

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 12>and development. Does a lot more energy need to be

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 12>applied into.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 7>R and D.

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think this is an area where you know,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 10>she has clearly signaled that he wants China to sort

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 10>of really focus its efforts on and it's allo sort

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 10>of to do with this big sort of rivalry that

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 10>China has now with the US. You know, New Productive

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 10>forces is a big sort of catual term. Essentially, what

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 10>she really wants is for trying to become a huge

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 10>tech superpower which can be self sufficient if it needs to,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 10>but also lead the world in many of these technologies,

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 10>and they've really been investing in that. You know, they

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 10>have a long way to catch up when it does

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 10>come to some areas like AI. But then you know,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 10>you have seen how trying to has sort of steamed

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 10>ahead in the EV sector and in terms of you know,

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 10>the way that they have sort of led the world

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 10>really in green technologies. You know, I think the interesting

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 10>thing is how that sort of then affects kind of

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 10>geopolitical relationships and standing in the world, because it seems

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 10>that the farther they do pull ahead in these kind

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 10>of areas, the more they sort of run into frictions

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 10>of their major trading partners, so they have to also

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 10>find sort of new markets for these kinds of innovations

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 10>that they are seeking to find. And also it sort

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 10>of comes back to this idea of all the emphasis

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 10>in the economy right now is on the supply side

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 10>rather than trying to create domestic demand.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 3>If you want free, willing innovation, don't you sort of

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 3>need more freedom. And also in the the particular predicament

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 3>that they're in now, we wonder whether it's an inflection

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 3>point between this sort of step by step stimulation and

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 3>something that approaches shock and all.

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 10>I think that is a really interesting question because the

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 10>assumption is that if you want innovation yet, you need

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 10>this sort of free kind of environment where people can

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 10>sort of like you know, experiment and everything. But then

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, if you look at China and look at

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 10>the green sectors or they have innovated, they've done all

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 10>that within a communist party system, which has just been

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 10>tightening over the past sort of twelve years. I think

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 10>like China actually is sort of the way it is

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 10>innovating is kind of challenging some of those assumptions about

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 10>the kind of environment that you do need to innovate.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the Chinese model has been to sort of

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 10>identify the areas you really want to grow, put like

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 10>a ton of government support behind it, let all of

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 10>these companies sort of go out and pile them and

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 10>the strongest will survive and the weakest will die off,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 10>and you'll be left with really, really strong companies that

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 10>can lead sectors. So it's kind of interesting to see

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 10>China do that and sort of confound some of those

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 10>sort of stereotypes out what you do need to sort

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 10>of innovate.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 12>Thanks to the two of you for helping us preview

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.760
<v Speaker 12>the third Planum, which gets underway next week. Rebecca Chung Wilkins,

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 12>Bloomberg Asia Government and Politics correspondent and Bloomberg's Jenny Marsh,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 12>team leader for Greater China ECO GOV. I'm Doug Krisner

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 12>along with Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. You can catch

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 12>us weekdays here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia beginning at eight

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 12>am in Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street.

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Tom.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Doug, and thank you Brian. And that does

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>it for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 2>us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street time

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 2>for the latest on markets. Overseas and the news you

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>need to start your day. I'm Tom Buzby. Stay with US.

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.