WEBVTT - #553 Packers Unscripted: Back from the bye

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to a new and improved edition of

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford,

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>joined in the same room for the first time in

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the season by my trusted colleague Wes Hodkowitz West. Welcome

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to our new studio here at Well. What's cool, Mike,

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because you've been a part of this now for a while.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You've been doing our own scripts here I think the

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>last what seventeen eighteen of them in our grand new

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>studio here at lambeau Field when I've been stuck in

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>my boss Barber's office. So I'm happy to join you. Finally.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>We are managing this the best that we can. But

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd be lying if I said it didn't feel to

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>have just a small bit of normalcy seeing your beautiful

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>face here on this wonderful Tuesday. Well, the feeling is mutual,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>my friend. So before we get going here, I do

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>want to throw out a little bit of sponsor business

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to our good friends at Sirius XM. NFL radio channel

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>on Sirius XM is the only radio outlet dedicated to

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League seven days a week, three hundred

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five days a year. All right West. The

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers bye week has concluded and they are getting ready

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for a trip to Tampa Bay to take on the Buccaneers.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>The Packers are four and oh. The offense is ranked

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>among the best in the league. The defense is ranked

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack in various important categories. I want

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to just get your thoughts here. Offensively, this has been

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the story that's dominating the Green Bay Packers in how efficient,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>how productive the offense has been. But we always hear

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>from Matt Lafleur. You look at the film, Yes, there

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are always ways to improve. So on the offensive side

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. As the Packers are coming out of

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the bye week here, what do you see as a

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>potential area of improvement. Well, I think the one thing

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see, especially now, is you see

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. They finally have a set five. It

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>appears to be with Lucas Patrick at right guard and

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Billy Turner right tackle. I think they have a good

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling for what they have in the backfield. I basically

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>isolated in those red zone situations where I think they

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can take that next step. Now, it's interesting they've actually

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>been pretty productive when they're kind of between that five

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and twenty yard line. I mean, you look at the

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>passes to Robert Tanian against the Falcons, some of the

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>plays that they've generated there. But when you get more

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>towards those golden goal situations, that's where it's been kind

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of hit or miss for them at this point. They've

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>had some great triumphs there and they've gotten stopped twice

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in fourth and goal from the only one. Obviously Jay

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Alexander sort of bailed them out of that last one,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and then certainly it happened again there against the Falcons.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think if they can find the right remedy there,

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was one thing that after that game, Matt

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>la Flour kind of you know, lamented the call and

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in some of the things he wished he could have

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>changed because I'll tell you what, Mike, in the eighty

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>yards in the middle of that field, the Packers have

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>been really difficult to stop. It's just a question of, okay,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when the defense is then able to condense a little

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more still winning those downs. I think if the

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers really you know, harness that area this game, uh,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be really a force here in the

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>second I guess technically second quarter of the season I

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>almost had second half of the season. Sure, I'm with

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>you there. I mean, this is definitely nitpicking with the

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>way the offense is rolling and the points that it

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>has been putting up. But if I were to point

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to one area, I would say short yardage. And it

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>goes along with what you said. You mentioned the two

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth and goals at the one against the Vikings and

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons where the Packers were stopped. They were also

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>stopped on a key fourth and one at midfield in

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. Now, as it turned out, none of those

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>stops damaged the Packers as much as they potentially could have.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the fact that if you

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>take out the uh the kneel downs at the end

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of the half or the end of the game, you

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>take those possessions out, the Packers have scored on twenty

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seven out of thirty five possessions so far in four games.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at three of those stops we're

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>due to the fourth and ones, the two at the

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>goal line and the one at midfield. This offense is

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like super super close to almost literally being unstoppable. So

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Packers have options in the backfield. Aaron

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones he obviously converted. I believe it was on a

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth and goal at the one. In one of the

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>other games he did score at the goal line there.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that was against New Orleans. You have Jamal Williams,

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a J. Dillon as another option as a

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>power back. Obviously Aaron Rodgers has run plenty of play

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>action passes out of short yardage. But I think if

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if the Packers shore up that we heard from Matt

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Lafleur all last season about wanting to be in those

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>manageable down and distances on third down, you get into

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>third and short and fourth and short, the Packers, the

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Packers can convert those at a better rate, and if

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>they do, they're going to be that much more dangerous.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that you know, we talked about that,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but I actually really do like the aggressiveness that Matt

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Laflour has shown in those situations. That think absolutely I agree.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>If you go back about ten years, Mike, there was

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>always like this pressure, Okay, this is where you maybe

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, look to have a field goal

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. But as much as as great

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.119
<v Speaker 1>as it is to have three points on the board,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there is something about that field position advantage that a

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>team puts themselves in and being able to manage that

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>throughout the game. And I think that that's one of

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>probably the hallmarks of this year's team time of possession

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and field position. The opposition hasn't had a lot of

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>great opportunities in terms of where they've started from, and

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>even in those situations, whether it was the JayR Alexander

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>sack or the Packers making the Falcons go the long

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>way and then ultimately I believe getting stopped when they

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>tried to move the ball down after the fourth and

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>goal stop uh at lambeau Field last week, so that

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the defense, I thought they have really been put into

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>an advantageous situation in that regard. And you know, you

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to floor always says that you

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>want to do, you know, all gas, no break, you

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want to keep your foot on the pedal, and they've

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely done that. Again, it's just about taking that next

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>step up and really putting themselves in an area where

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look offensively, whether it's total yards, points production,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>few in the league right now have done what Green

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Bay has done. Yeah, absolutely well. On the defensive side

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, What would you pinpoint as the most

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>important area of improvement for Mike Petton and his career. Well,

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw it in the Atlanta game. It's the run defense.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's the one benefit that I think we've seen.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>As many injuries as the Packers have had to deal

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with here in the first half of the season, how

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>guys have responded. They didn't have Kenny Clark for the

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>last three and a half games, So what does that mean.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>That means that Tyler Lancaster has to step up at

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle. It means Kingsley Kiki has to become a

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>force there in that dime defensive line role, and both

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of those guys did that. They lost Kamal Martin at

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season. So here's Chris Barnes out

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. He has to be the rundown linebacker. Christian

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Kirksey goes down with an injury, then it's up to

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Tye Summers to fill in. And I think

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>what ultimately happened. The Packers did take some bumps and

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 1>bruises here early on, but that Atlanta game, to me

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>showed that yet even if they don't have Clark out there,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>even if they don't have Kerksy out there, they can

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>be a good run defense, and I thought the defensive

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>front put together their best performance. Now can they stack

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it against Ronald Jones in the Tampa Bay Buccaneers this

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>upcoming weekend, because they probably you know, we'll see what

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>happens with practice, but it appears likely that they'll be

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>getting Kenny Clark here back sooner than later. We'll have

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens with Kirksy. Kamal Martin returned to

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>practice as well this week, so maybe he'll be in

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the fold here soon. But the lessons that the Barnes,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the key Keys, the Lancasters learned over these first four weeks,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna pay dividends for the Packers in

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the long run. Yeah, I agree with you. I think

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the the way Mike Petton has been forced to UH

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to reach into his depth a little bit and getting

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys, especially a young guy like Barnes

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and undrafted rookie UH certainly falls into that category. We'll see,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned Kamal Martin getting back to practice if

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>within the next few weeks, maybe he's able to get

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on the field. Though, getting that experience early in a

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>rookie season can can really pay off down the road.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you there. If I were to point

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to two areas I wrote this in in inbox over

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the bye week, tackling and takeaways. I think those are

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the two areas that Mike Patton's defense can improve upon.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought the first two games of the season, the

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>tackling was solid and we weren't talking about miss tackles.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>But the last two games the Saints and the Falcons,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we all know what happened in New Orleans with the

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>miss tackles on Alvin Kamara. Against the Falcons, there were

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>several miss tackles again, but it was it was different

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the the miss tackles actually prevented

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the defense from putting themselves in really good situations. They

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>were missing tackles for loss, where then the ball carrier

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>was getting back to the line of scrimmage or getting

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a two or three yard gain. And I guess in

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some ways this goes hand in hand because if you

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>get a get an offense in second and fourteen as

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>opposed to second and nine, well that's when the takeaways

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>might start to happen. And the Packers, you know, they

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>hurt themselves and didn't give themselves those opportunities against the

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Falcons because of the mistackles. Over All, the Packers are

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>plus three in the turnover margin through four games. That's

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a good spot to be in because you're on pace

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into plus double digits by the end of

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the season, and that is where you want to be.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But they're plus three mostly because the offense has zero

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>turnovers the defense only has three takeaways, and three takeaways

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>through four games, there have been opportunities for more. I

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think if the Packers start to capitalize defensively on those opportunities,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we will start to see a different look to this

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>unit as the season goes along. Yeah, and and it's

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>funny you bring that up, because this defense is different

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>when they're in second and third and long just the

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>way they can use the Darius Smith changes. And as

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned with Kingsley Kiki, you know, with Kenny Clark

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back here, the number of ways that Mike Patton

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to use him. This guy

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be in eighty five percent defensive, you know,

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>snap player, you can be more strategic in terms of

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the dime defense or if you want to use them

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on rundowns given the situation. That's what they needed to

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>see from that defensive line group. And you know, a

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>real big positive for green Bay was Rashawn Gary being

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>back at practice two on Monday. If he's able to play,

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You've seen the way that they can move all those

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces around. There's just a swagger to that group. There's

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>just a momentum shift that you feel in a lot

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of times that ends up leading to take aways. It

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>leads to the force fumbles, which was a huge emphasis

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going to this season. It leans, it leads into timely

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>turnovers like the the interception that Chandon Sullivan had a

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago for the pick six, and certainly

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Jaire Alexander that's just the one thing left for him,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, to becoming an elite cornerback in this league.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He talked about that interception he almost had two weeks ago.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>He's looking to the end zone. He needs to look

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that ball in. He does that, he becomes a five

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>interception player in this league per season. That's when you

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>start to realize exactly what his upside is going to be.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>In addition to being a lockdown, shutdown cornerback, yeah, you

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the takeaway opportunities. The last couple of games.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Alexander with a possible pick six against New Orleans,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't quite able to bring the ball in.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>There were two other times the Saints put the ball

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, once on a kickoff return, once on

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a sack by Kiki of Drew Brees, but the Packers

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't able to come up with those fumbles. Matt Ryan

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>threw a terrible pass quite frankly on a on a

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>slant and the Packers had two defenders. I believe it

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was Barnes and Savage, both essentially taking the ball away

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>from each other in a sense, because they each had

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance to to get that one, and unfortunately the

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers didn't come up with it. But those are the

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that you have to you have two seize on

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it because Drew Brees is only gonna fumble on a

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sack maybe once a game, right, Matt Ryan is only

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>going to throw that bad pass into traffic once a game.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>The Packers didn't capitalize on those opportunities. You start capitalizing

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on those down the road. I think the picture changes

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for the defense um quickly. Here was a little more

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sponsored business. Gear up for game day, folks, Open a

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Packers checking account from Associated Bank and score a fifty

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar Packers Pro Shop gift card. Learn more at Associated

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>bank dot com. Backslash Packers. All right, well, give me

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>your thumbnail sketch here of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Packers opponent for this Sunday. They lost Week one on

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the road NFC South rival in New Orleans there oh

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and one to start the Tom Brady Era. Then they

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>win three straight and they've got a thirteen nothing lead

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday night in Chicago, looking like they were going

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to make it a four game winning streak. Suddenly everything turns.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The offense can't get anything going. They only kicked two

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>more field goals at Soldier Field the rest of that ballgame.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The Buccaneers come out on the short end, and suddenly

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting at three and two and looking to avoid

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>three and three after six games with an undefeated Packers

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>team coming to Tampa. Yeah, it's funny too, Mike, because

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay I think is gonna be a headache for

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone this year that you're never gonna be able to

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>sleep on them. But you're also not sure what you're

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get in the Buccaneers, and that game was a

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of that. You know, for them to get

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yard game out of Ronald Jones, who looks

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to be an exceptional running back in

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this league. You know Tom Brady, we know what he's

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of become at age forty three. I mean, he

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>can still win you a ballgame, but it's very high percentage.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It's allowing guys to create plays. Mike Evans leading the

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>league in touchdowns right now. That defense, for as up

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and down as they were last year, if you didn't

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>pay enough attention to the Buccaneers, their defense was terrific

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>last season, and a lot of those same playmakers are back,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>though now they've lost Vita Villa, So from that regard,

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't sleep on them. But at the same time,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>way too many penalties against the Bears came back to

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>haunt them. An inability to finish drives in the second half,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an inability to establish a four minute offense at the

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>end of that Bears game that could have shut the

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>door on it, and overall just not enough execution. And

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think in some regards that's probably a product of

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a team that has just had to come together this season.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>New quarterback, new coach, new philosophies. There's been a lot

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of upheaval in Tampa Bay with their personnel. Not to mention,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have Gronk there now is their tight end.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So in that regard, it doesn't necessarily surprise me. There's

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been some up and down roller coaster ebb and flow

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the early part of the season. But at

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you can't look at that and be like, well,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Packers, this is an automatic win. They

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>need to play more disciplined, They need to be efficient,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>especially early on, to set the tone in that game,

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and they need to be able to close it out

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the winds and losses for

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers so far this season, when they've closed things out,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they've won. When they have been able to get a

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>result like they did against Chicago. Yeah, Tom Brady, it

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like he had things going there for a while,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but you look at his overall season so far, and

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, new head coach, he's coming into a

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>whole new offense, he's learning a whole bunch of stuff.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But Tom Brede, he's made his share of mistakes. So far,

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>He's thrown two pick six is this year, if I'm

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken, one against New Orleans, one against the Chargers.

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He was able to come back from a seven teen

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>point deficit against the Chargers and and pull out that

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>victory a couple of weeks ago. I'm sure Thursday night

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it can't be fun for a quarterback in his early

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>forties to have to play a game on a short week.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>With the travel up from Tampa to Chicago. That was

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the circumstances were not in the Buccaneers favor there.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, they started out the game with a thirteen

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing lead. It looked like they were going to cruise

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to another victory, and then everything turned for them. This

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is an interesting one West because

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with the way things are in the NFC right now,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is five and oh, the Packers are four and oh,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are four and one, the Bears are four

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and one. I mentioned Tampa Bay here. They they're trying

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to avoid a three and three start. They really after

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that loss last week on Thursday Night, they really want

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to four and two and keep themselves in

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that conversation amongst the content or is at the top

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the NFC, especially with this year, there's only one

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>first round by in the playoffs, you get the number

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>two seed, you're still playing in a wild card game.

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So the fight for the top of the conference and

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to try to get that first round by it's going

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty heated all the way along. And Tampa

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay wants wants to keep themselves in that mix. Yeah,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you and I could have a two hour roundscripted

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>where I continue to just be beside myself about these

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>seven teams making it at each conference, but we won't

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go there. We'll save that discussion for January. Perhaps I'm

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that. Yeah. What I do think though,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is the one whether you're viewed as a benefit or

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a detractor. The one thing that this change has made

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is it's given a kind of more of a college

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>football field now where it's like, Okay, you gotta play

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>well from week one if you want to be the

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>number one seed in your conference, you have to be

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>able to keep that going to play for the national championship,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. So that that's what's at stake here.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why it actually really did matter that the Vikings

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't able to pull off that win over Seattle because

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>now Seattle's five and oh and the Packers are trying

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to get to catch up and stay stay at that pace,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>especially in an NFC that appears to have just incredible

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>parody this year when you look at the issues that

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco has had and some of these other teams

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>already taking two losses to begin the season. So yeah,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why this game is pivotal. And it's pivotal from

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa based perspective too, because here they are in

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a position where they can try to get some distance

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>in the South if they get this win. So I

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a great matchup. Seeing the chess

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>match between Mike Petton and Tom Brady and then obviously

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers going against the pressure packages in the front

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that the Buccaneers have. It's gonna be great theater. The

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>only question I have is you're going down to Tampa.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be eighty five degrees or whatever it's going

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. Uh, we haven't seen those type of conditions

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in a while. Um, you know, I go back to

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was when they played Tampa and fourteen.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a pretty toasty day in December, if I

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>remember right. But the guy's gotta get acclimated to that,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and they've got to be able to a rise of

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the occasion they did in New Orleans, they did in Minnesota,

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they have to do it again. Well, you mentioned the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers trying to keep pace with the Seattle Seahawks. Seattle

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is five and oh, the Packers are going to try

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to get to five and oh you've also got the

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears at four and one is if the Packers

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>were to stumble, suddenly there's a tie a top the

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>NFC North. So Green Bay trying to trying to keep

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>themselves there. Really interesting though. Before we go here, I

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 1>just have to get your opinion on what's going on

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle, because Cam Newton for the Patriots is one

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>yard away on the goal line from beating the Seahawks

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on the last play of the game. Can't do it.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The Minnesota Vikings have multiple fourth downs, both on offense

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and on defense to try to put the Seahawks away,

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and they can't do it. And the Seattle Seahawks. The

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks have the worst defense in the league statistically

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of yards allowed, which which when you think

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>about it, is is a mind boggling. They have the

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>last ranked defense in the league in terms of yards allowed,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>yet they're five and oh and uh, this this race

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC for playoff spots, playoff positioning, everything else,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It's going to really really be entertaining here as we

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>go along. You had to edit my insider inbox for Tuesday.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on this too,

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>because I know a lot of people always asking. It

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>came up a lot last season about green Bay and

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>in thirteen and three, what does that mean? What does

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it mean when you're five and oh? But you know

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>right now they've they've kind of struggled to win with

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>style points this Seattle Seahawks have. And my contention is

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter now in a sixteen game season, that

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>separates the cream from the rest of the crop here

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and it is going to ultimately be ken Seattle continue

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to do this and be a fourteen and twelve, thirteen

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and three, twelve and four type ball club. Can they

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>actually accomplish that or are you going to see them

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>come back a little bit sort of like how green

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay sort of came back down to earth and fifteen

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>before run the table. So that's where I'm kind of

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>stuck in terms of exactly where this all goes. Sixteen,

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, from the table, that's right, make sure

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I correct my off. That's what it all comes down to,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because right now, you can't dog them for being five

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and oh. They found a way, regardless of how they

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>did it, to win five games. It is way too

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do that in the National Football League. This

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is not college football. You're not playing you know, these

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>these FBS lows, you know, mid major schools to get

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>to five and oh to start a conference season. No,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the NFL. And they've had to play real

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>competition week in a week out, and they got the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings best game and they still found a way

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to win it. I think you have to tip your

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>cap to them for that. Yeah, absolutely, I mean we

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>talked about it last year with the Packers. Yes, they

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>were winning close games, pulling games out in the fourth quarter.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>You always deserve credit for that. You look at it

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>as hey, they probably haven't played their best game yet.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we actually saw the Packers best

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>game in twenty nineteen, even in going thirteen and three,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>winning a playoff game, making it to the NFC Championship.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see maybe the Packer, the Packers best

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>game that we thought we might see last year, We're

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that here at the beginning of With

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>regard to the Seahawks, that is a team that has

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>played really, really good defense for a long time. With

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>where their defense is ranked right now, I will just

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>say the Seattle Seahawks aren't playing their best football, but

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they're winning. They still they have things that they can

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>improve on and get better. So to me, it's like

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>some people look at it as well, they're right on

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the edge and they're gonna fall off the cliff. I

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it as watch out because this team has

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>areas where it can play better, and I think and

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it will. And Seattle right now is is

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the catbird seed at five, and oh they're

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>fortunate to be there, but I think it's a position

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to take advantage well. And the reality is

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>too they have a future Hall of Fame quarterback. I

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any you know, wrong reason to

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>say that that that's where the trajectory is pointing for

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, and now he has a weapon in DK

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf that has averaging two yards per catch. Right now,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>when you have that type of explosivity to your offense,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what your defense does. Ask the two

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven Packers. I mean, that's just the way it goes.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So you have to score the opposition in Through the

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>first five games this season, Seattle has done just that. Yeah,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well with that, we will call it a

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>wrap on this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>follow all of our coverage of the team, all the

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>preview coverage leading up to Packers Buccaneers on Sunday on

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot com for Wes, I am Mike. Thank you

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in everybody. We'll see you next time.