WEBVTT - China Urges Companies Not to Use Nvidia’s H20 Chips 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I have to be honest with you. I'm

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>having a hard time keeping up with this whole China

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in video AMDB, the fifteen percent tariffs? Can the chips?

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Are they welcome in China? Are they not? Can they

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>sell them in China? Let's go to Ed Lolo. He's

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>on top of this stuff. Ed loves the Bloomberg Technology

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>co host. He's over in London right now. Hey, Ed,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>what's the latest here in China?

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Is?

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess they're urging firms not to use in video's

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>H twenty chip. I thought things were kind of thawing

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is fast moving. This is, you know, the

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>only appropriate time of the phrase market whip saw that

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I've been able to use to date in this contact.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 3>The Information has reported that China's Internet regulator has ordered

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 3>firm ordered specific technology companies Ali Barber, Tencent among them,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>to stop placing orders of in Nvidia's H twenty. The

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 3>H twenty is the China specific chip that had had

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 3>performance engineered out of it that was subject to export control.

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 3>What we knew, by the way as of Monday morning

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>was that Nvidia had not in any recent months shipped

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>any H twenties to China anyway. But the problem with

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>this latest report, which has been in the last hour

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>or so, is that it's a much more extreme move

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>by China than what Bloomberg had reported overnight, which was

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>basically an advisory. Chinese authorities had strongly recommended to various

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Chinese technology companies not to use the H twenty in particular,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>as well as one chip from AMD. The market's reacting,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that's all that matters.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, So you're seeing shores of Nvidia down a touch,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 4>about eight tens of a percent here. Can you just

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 4>speak a bit more about what are the implications here

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 4>for in Nvidia in particular.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the state of play is really important to understand.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 3>In Vidia's H twenty chip is not the best chip

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that a Chinese technology company can buy. Huawei, which is

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>essentially China's domestic champion, has actually several generations of chip

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>that have better performance and power not just more than

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the Age twenty, but of in Nvidia's H two hundred chip,

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>which until very recently was the sort of cutting ed

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.839
<v Speaker 3>generation accelerator that many American companies used. They've since moved

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 3>on to a later generation called Blackwell that's not available

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>in China. The President, as you know, confirmed yesterday about

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours ago, that he had cut a deal

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and ad hoc arrangement, a quid pro quo with both

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia and AMD where he would allow them to export

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 3>these China specific chips with lower power performance in exchange

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 3>for fifteen percent of the revenues gained from that market

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>for Chinese AI accelerators. The problem is, like, what are

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 3>we interpreting this as. Is China responding in this way

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>because it's a tactic in the broader negotiations between the

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>United States and China of trade overall, that is what

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the analyst community thinks. Or is China protecting its own

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 3>domestic industry for AI accelerators making sure that Chinese tech

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 3>companies buy a Chinese AI chip. Both are possible. The

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 3>main conclusion of cross both is that now Wall Street

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>has to reassess how likely it is that in Video

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and AMD do business in that market, at least in

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the near term.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Ed I guess if I were an analy certain investor,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd be saying, I think I have to factor into

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>my model that the intro would be know that I

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>can't imagine. Yeah, some of the advanced chips being allowed

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>into China just doesn't feel like the political winds are

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>blowing that way at this point.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are certain sections of Wall Street the

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 3>most bullish analysts in Video's next quarter coming up is

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal second quarter. Some people saw them doing seven

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars of sales in China on the basis that, Okay,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>President said, it's cool even if you have to pay

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>a fifteen percent so called export tax, and there are

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>questions about how constitutional that that rule would be, which

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>we can get into shore. It's still better to have

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 3>eighty five percent access to a market than zero. So

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>everyone was like, they can do this quickly, like just

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>turn the tap back on. I would wager I think

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I said this yesterday anyway, But twenty four hours on,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 3>given the newsflow, they're probably reassessing their model down and

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 3>down and down closer towards zero.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>And we of course know that China is a major

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 4>player here when we think about in video. But and

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Vida also holds a significant market share in the AI

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>chip sector about ninety five percent. So tell us Abit

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 4>how big of a deal this most recent news is

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 4>and how does it kind of change how you look

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 4>ahead of these earnings that we're going to be getting

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>coming soon.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing is, and the reason why, you know,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 3>Paor and I back and forth over over the sellside

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>over the last couple of days. As important is there's

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>been zero business for nvideo in China, at least since

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the turn of the year. You know, they wrote down

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars worth of chips that were specifically made

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 3>for that market, and they haven't sent any of them there.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's say they're just sitting in a warehouse somewhere. They

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 3>probably are. However, when you think about the context of

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>AI development, the number of researchers and companies working on models,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.119
<v Speaker 3>about half of the world's activity is happening in China.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>It was an important end market. Will we return.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarclay and Android Otto

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Looking at the cannabis company, Kilray Brands, it's a name

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about a little bit this morning. Stacks

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 2>up about nine ten percent here. That's a good news.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>The band news it is down about twenty five percent

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 2>year to date, and I think it's up on part.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Looking at some of the Bloomberg reporting here, President Trump

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>made some comments that maybe he'd be open to reclassifying cannabis,

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe as a less restrictive drug their substance. So I

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>went to bring in Ken Shay, he covers all this

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. Senior consumer products analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Ken talk to us about the comments that President Trump

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 2>made as it relates to the cannabis industry and how

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 2>impacko could that be?

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Hi, Paul, sure. So what I understand is President

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Trump over the weekend made some comments with regard to

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 5>a marijuana rescheduling in the US, a topic that's been

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 5>very top of mine among this industry for a while,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 5>and apparently he said that the administration was going to

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 5>be looking into it now, that's really a long way

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 5>between that and actual rescheduling. But nevertheless, this beaten down

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 5>industry and the close observers too, it took that as

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 5>a dose of old or you know, overdo good news.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean, these stocks have have you alluded to before,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 5>are down, you know, over fifty percent or so of

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 5>many of the big ones. So this hint of good

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 5>news has led to a rally yesterday and today. But

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, I would advise observers to you know, temper

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 5>their enthusiasm because, as I mentioned, it's a long process

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 5>between looking into it and actual rescheduling it, and it's

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 5>even further to legalize it, which would really bestow the

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 5>greatest benefits of all.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned how we've seen a lot of these

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 4>stocks really taking a beating this year. Can you just

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of contextualize here for our listeners what has created

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 4>this this lag?

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Sure, so the market really had turned negative for

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 5>the last couple of years actually with a lack of

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 5>progress made on federal reform of this industry. You know,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 5>many states have taken it upon themselves to legalize either

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 5>at the medical or adult use level. I mean some

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 5>forty states now talking to a vast majority of states

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 5>have now legal cannabis in some form, so they a

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>lot of the industry players and the market thought it's

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 5>just a matter of time that the federal government would

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 5>retire these really old you know, the treaties that require

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 5>cannabis to be a Schedule one drug and then really

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 5>puts the handcuffs on this industry to do a lot

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 5>of good things in terms of business. You know, consumer

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.599
<v Speaker 5>product companies in general have the benefits of the economies

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 5>of scale because they have interstate commerce, they can advertise,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 5>they're not hurt by onerous taxes which these companies are

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 5>subject to. So a lot of a lot of barriers

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 5>facing this industry still given the current status, and so

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 5>it's really over the prior to these comments over the weekend,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 5>I think there's really been a sense of throwing the

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 5>towel in among investors with this group, and so that

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 5>that's why you're seeing this at the magnification of response

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 5>to this news today.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So can if the majority of states have legalized cannabis,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>what's the what's the problem with the federal government coming

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>around and doing the same.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, the biggest thing, Paul, is because This is a

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 5>treaty that was signed back in the seventies and the

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Nixon administration that again it's part of the anti drug

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 5>wars back then, they set this in a stone basically,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 5>and only an Act of Congress can change that treaty

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 5>to no longer include marijuana cannabis, uh, you know, as

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 5>a Schedule one drug. So so I guess you know,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Congress doesn't seem to be willing to act. I mean,

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 5>that's the biggest thing that the biggest blockade to legalization,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of the shortcut reclassification under the Controlled Substances Act.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 5>A lot of the industry is saying, look, you're you're

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 5>putting us at Schedule one, which is the same level

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 5>as you know, ecstasy and only these horrible harmful things.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 5>And the definition for a Schedule one is there's no

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 5>proven medical value. Well, that kind of contradicts the own

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 5>FDA's decision a few years ago when it approved a

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 5>a cannabis drug called epidialects, which is used to treat

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 5>seizures in rare cases for epilepsy. So clearly the medical

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 5>use and it doesn't belong to the Schedule one if

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 5>it was your scheduled if it was rescheduled to three,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 5>it would still remain illegal unless that treaties are changed.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 5>It could at least alleviate something called two ade and

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 5>a tax code which basically says, look, if you're in

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 5>the drug business, maybe a bad thing, but we still

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 5>want your taxes. And so they don't allow these companies,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 5>these cannabis companies to deduct ordinary business expenses like rent, salary, marketing,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 5>and so as you can imagine, the taxation hit to

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 5>these companies is just dramatic, and that's really their biggest problem.

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 4>So there was a time back in the early nineteen

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 4>twenties when cigarettes were illegal and then of course we

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 4>know now when we look at the industry, the tobacco

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>industry globally, it's a multi billion dollar industry. So if

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 4>we think about cannabis stocks and a lot of these

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>companies here, what's the bowl case.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, the ball case is that at some point either

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 5>gets rescheduled or legalized, and that's a long, long term

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Can I remember the market as a discounting mechanism is

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 5>looking you know, well into the future. Now, if you're

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 5>a real bull, you look well into the future. You know,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 5>these companies at the gross margin line are very profitably.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 5>It's about forty to fifty sixty percent gross margins. That's

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 5>a pretty good business. But it's when you get below

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 5>that they really get hurt, particularly the taxation line. So

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>if you're a ball on this industry, you say, you

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 5>know what, these are pretty good companies. You need a

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 5>license to compete, so there's natural barriers to entry. We

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 5>know there's a demand for this product. It's been around

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 5>for a long time, so you know, I think we

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 5>just get the regulation right, this could be a pretty

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 5>good business.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Ken you also cover the big tobacco companies. How are they,

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 2>how have they been impacted or may they be impacted

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>with the various tariff discussions that are out there.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, the US tobacco industry is really a domestic business.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 5>You know the big guys, you know Aultria, Uh, they

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 5>source virtue all the tobacco domestically for domestic use, so

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>they were only exposure to the tariffs is really very small.

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 5>Some of the materials they use, like they're smokeless tobacco cans,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 5>ten metals, things like that. Then they you know, get

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 5>from suppliers offshore and that could be indirect problems. I mean,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, other suppliers could raise prices in a small

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 5>way for products for other inputs, but by and large,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 5>they they've been skirt they've been they can skirt this problem,

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 5>and it's not really an issue for the US tobacco industry.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Quickly hopping off of that question, I'm going to ask

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the same of cannabis. Is that more a domestic industry here?

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Any tariff concerns.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 5>No tariffs concerned. Matter of fact, it's illegal to import

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 5>cannabis into the US, so it would only be to

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>the extent where the vaporizers and the electronic goods and

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 5>the you know, the ancillary products that are used with

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 5>cannabis are subject to those import terrorists. But the planet itself,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 5>there's no tiriff issue.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Say with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Looking at this market, we still got some greena on

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>at this reen here today I want to check in

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 2>with on rog run on a Bloomberg intelligence technology analysts

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 2>honorack I Steem remember something in the zeitgeist, as Tom

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Keen would say, Elon Musk not real happy with Apple

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and maybe even vice versa. I'm not sure what's going

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 2>on there.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, if you go back a few years ago, you know,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 6>Elon made a big deal of about the fee that

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 6>they have to pay on for you know, X subscriber

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 6>to the thirty percent or so. I mean there was

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 6>a visible argument. But you know, in a few days

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 6>he was seen, you know, walking around with him cocaine

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 6>in the campus, and you know, the whole thing. I mean,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 6>today's complain was a bit odd because apps on the

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 6>App Store don't go up just because Apple wants to

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 6>do it that way. I mean, they go up because

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 6>users are downloading one app over the other. In fact,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 6>the other day, I remember the perplexity CEO was saying

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 6>that in India App Store, you know, his app is

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 6>above Chat, GPT and so forth. So I mean he's

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 6>basically complaining that, you know, Xai is not getting the

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 6>same love as Chad GPT is, which to me is

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 6>understandable given you know where the presence of that is

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the ecosystem and the users. So I

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 6>think that's really, you know, some argument going there, but

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 6>I think it's it's just news. Frankly, it's it's there's

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 6>not much to it.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, so you mentioned not much to it. So

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 4>where do you go from here? I mean, how what

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 4>steps forward would he need to make to see any

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 4>changes here?

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 6>He has to go prove the world that his grock

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 6>model is better than Chad GPT and their models. They

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 6>just launched a brand new model and they have to

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 6>go figure out whether it's better than that, And he

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 6>has to go and sell that to either enterprises or

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the consumer application and become you know, have the same

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 6>number of users. I mean, you just can't say that,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, my product is not doing better because somebody

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 6>else is you know, not giving it the same amount

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 6>of love. Even Google's model Gemini is doesn't have that

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 6>level of user based right now. I mean, the first

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 6>movement advantage is open AI and Chad GPT, and the

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 6>user growth has just been phenomenal, you know, on that end,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 6>and there isn't I you know, I don't think I

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 6>know anybody at this time who's not using Chad GPT

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 6>on their phone or any other device that they.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Have you can look at me, I don't use it.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Apple. I see the stock having this

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>nice move here, you know, during the month of August.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Here is this a sense that maybe they'll do something

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to maybe get a little bit more in the game

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to AI.

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 6>I think we to discuss this a few months ago,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 6>when you know, the President came out and criticized them

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 6>for building phones in India, and you know, the stock

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 6>really took a hte at that point. But I think

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 6>them could do the right thing. He announced the big plan,

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 6>He went to the White House, he you know, essentially

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 6>gave President Trump an assurance that he is working very

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 6>hard to bring whatever he can in the US. You know,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 6>this was just glass at one point, but I think

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 6>that really made a huge pivot. The President was extremely

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 6>complimentary of the stuff that he's doing. So I mean,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 6>since then, you can see stocks pin at a tier.

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 6>So there was danger that you know, it could they

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 6>could be additional surcharge on Apple or anything out there.

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 6>So you don't want to be against the president at

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 6>this point. So I think Apple's done a good job

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 6>of managing that. Now the question is whether iPhone seventeen

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 6>will deliver. We've heard it's got a really cool new

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 6>phone coming out, so I think things are looking good

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 6>for Apple from that, but I'm still waiting for one

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 6>particular element, that is the Google case and whether Apple

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 6>gets to keep the powers partially or somewhat of the

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 6>payment that it gets from Google.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Next guest had a fascinating story out Bloomberg Business Week

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>cover story Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant. The US Treasury sector

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>has the ear of an impulsive president and nervous investors worldwide.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Hope it stays that way. And Eric Schatsker has an

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>exclusive interviewed Eric Schatsker, Bloomberg New Economy Editorial director, Should

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>we just live here in on our Bloomberg and Active

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Broker studio. Eric your setan Scott beston for an extended

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>period of time. What were some of your takeaways there?

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Gosh, Well, first of all, the man is unbelievably busy.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 7>Spent a day at the Treasury Department with ALCOHOLICU Dan Flatley,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 7>and to observe how much he gets done in the

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 7>course of a day, including spending an extended amount of

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 7>time with US, gives you a window into the life

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 7>of the Treasury Secretary in the Trump administration. And it's

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 7>important to emphasize in the Trump administration because this particular

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Treasury Secretary has been given a whole host of responsibilities

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 7>that go beyond that of the typical Treasury secretary. We

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 7>know that the Treasury Secretary in any administration is involved

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 7>in tax policy, is involved in economic sanctions, is involved

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 7>in financial regulation, and the like. But President Trump has

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 7>tasked Scott Bessen with trade negotiations with striking and not

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 7>just any old trade negotiations. China perhaps the most difficult

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 7>trade negotiation of all, Japan, which was successful, South Korea,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 7>which was successful, Indonesia. The list goes on. He's also

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 7>the acting IRS Commissioner. He also crafted the deal that

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 7>the very novel and original deal that the United States

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 7>struck with Ukraine for a share of that country's mineral

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 7>resource wealth back in April. These are not and furthermore,

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 7>I have to add he was instrumental in getting the

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 7>One Big Beautiful Bill through opposition in both among Republicans

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 7>in both the House and the Senate in order to

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 7>meet the president's self imposed July fourth deadline. So Scott

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 7>Besson has taken on way more than your traditional Treasury

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 7>secretary does, and much of that is because the President

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 7>himself has asked him to do so.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 4>And it seems as though a lot of people see

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 4>Besson as really having the president's ear here. And this

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 4>is a really fantastic story. Okay, what was the most

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 4>surprising element through your conversation with him?

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, there are so many surprises. I would say that

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 7>the thing I didn't fully appreciate and which he spelled

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 7>out for us, and which others spelled out for us,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 7>is the degree to which this is something he sought

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 7>after going back many years. Besson told us that he

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 7>thought about joining the Trump campaign as early as twenty sixteen,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 7>but at that time he just started a new hedge fund,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 7>Key Square Group, and he didn't feel like he could

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 7>abandon his employees or abandon his clients. But what he

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 7>did do was start to get to know the people

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 7>close to Trump almost immediately thereafter, starting with Steve Bannon

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 7>and subsequently Peter Navarro, Stephen Moore, Kevin Hassett. For example,

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 7>Trump's close economic advisor's Art Lafer. He went down to

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 7>see Art Lafer in the South, made a pilgrimage of

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 7>starts to get Art Lafer's blessing for his ambitions to

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 7>become Treasury secretary, and these he didn't make known to

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 7>Trump until October of twenty twenty three. Excuse me, November

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 7>of twenty twenty three throws, So it was almost a

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 7>six year period in which he was maneuvering to position

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 7>himself for a shot at Treasury secretary. And when he

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 7>saw Trump in that November twenty twenty three meeting at

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 7>mar Alago, Trump asked him if he wanted the job,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 7>if he was interested in being fed chair, and Besson said, no,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 7>I have another job in mind.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Very good. The Street Eric gives Scott Besson a fair

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>amount of credit for walking to President back and maybe

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the more difficult tariffs that were initially announced.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Is that a valid point that Scott Beson play a

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 2>big role in walking the president back a little bit,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>and does he take credit for that or is he

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of demure.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 7>Besson insists that his job is not to explain things

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 7>to the president or to advise the president. It is

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 7>to present the president with a series of options. Here's

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 7>path one, here's path two, here's here's path three, and

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 7>I will explain to you where we get if we

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 7>go down one, if we go down two, or if

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 7>we go down three, and he leaves it ultimately for

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 7>Trump to make the decision. That's very I wouldn't say

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 7>that's unique to this president, but Trump has a very

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 7>particular view of his role as a decide in chief

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 7>in this administration that is perhaps different from what we

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 7>saw with Biden, or with Obama, or even going back

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 7>in history to other Republicans like George W. Bush and

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 7>maybe even Ronald Reagan. So Besont does not claim credit

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 7>for being the de escalationist, but it is clear talking

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 7>to people around him and to understanding how the market

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 7>thinks market psychology, if you will, which is you know,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 7>one of his areas of expertise, having been a macro

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 7>hedge fund manager for almost forty years. That is where

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 7>it really counts. The market trusts him, and the market

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 7>based on its observations draws these conclusions, rightly or wrongly.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Does he share any concerns he may have about just

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>getting somehow involved in some of the crossfire that happens

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>around President Trump and getting into President Trump's bad graces

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>or just kind of I mean, because it's such a

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>perilous those people that fight fly close to President Trump

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>historically have done at their own risk. Well, the former

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>vice president, so yeah, how does he shape Is he

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>even acknowledged that that's a risk.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 7>What I divine from the conversations we had with the

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 7>Treasury Secretary is that it there is a formula for

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 7>success in the Trump administration, and it means making certain

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 7>compromises if you will with yourself. You can come in

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 7>with your own ideas, but it is not your job

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 7>to advance that agenda. So you have to make some compromises.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 7>If you don't, and Steve Stephen Mnuch and the former

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 7>treasure secretary, points this out, if you cannot represent the

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 7>president well, in other words, if you can't get behind

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 7>what the president wants, the role has no power. What's

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 7>the point of being in DC. What's the point of

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 7>abandoning a forty year career in finance where you rose

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 7>to be one of the most successful hedge fund managers

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 7>and have you know, for it all to be worthless,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 7>have to have no power. No, you want to be

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 7>able to wield influence and get things done. And that's

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 7>very much much in the back of Scott Beston's mind.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 7>What's my legacy as Treasury Secretary going to be.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal