WEBVTT - U.S. Bans Travel from India as Virus Surges

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carrol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News Present, Biden saying it's gonna

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be a tough call on whether it order U. S.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Troops to get vaccinated. It's funny, Tim, I actually thought

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the military was already getting vaccinated. But that's not the case. No,

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And look, I think this is something that

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of organizations are struggling with right now. To

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>what extent can you actually mandate of vaccination? Yeah, exactly.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So we've got that going on. We've got global cases

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the virus topping a hundred and fifty million India

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>remaining at the epicenter of the pandemic. They reported record

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>new infections today. There's a lot going on. Let's get

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to it with Dr Ian LUs Bader, as we always

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do on our Friday's clotl a professor of medicine at

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>n y U Land, going on the phone in Michigan

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on this Friday. Dr LUs Bade, are nice to have

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. How are you good? Good? Always

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure, Happy Friday, guys. Oh my god, this has

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>been I guess it's been a hard week. Um helped

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>me out here because we did have a headline to

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Reuter's reporting that the president is set to ban most

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>travel to the US from India. So I was having

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with someone and it's like, look, we're doing

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so great, and he's like, my wife, she's from India.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing so great. The world is still having

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a tough time, and we don't get through it, all

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of us until everybody gets through it. UM. I know

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked to you about this kind of almost every

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>week at this point, but give me your thoughts on this,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>especially as we watch what's going on in Indian some

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. So as we talked about

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>last week and really we're at the head of the curve.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>We knew that India was erupting, and uh, I don't

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think we've anywhere near seeing the top. You know, we're

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>estimating a hundred and fifty million global case, says. I

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think all of these are really gross underestimates. I think

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the ability for many countries to track the real number

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of cases is flawed. In Night and the Spanish Blue,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it was estimated about a third of the world's population

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>came down with a Spanish flu, higher higher mortality than

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing now. Uh, and that was before air travel

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>was really widespread. So I think this is really sort

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the tip of the spirit of the tip of

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg as what we're seeing. And I do think,

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>even though it maybe politically incorrect, I think a travel ban,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>even though that's very imperfect, is probably very reasonable to

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>do based on what we're seeing in India. Why is

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that is that because of variants? Yes, so, I think

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>India has a number of problems. One, you know, for

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the skeptics of public health measures, this is really an

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>example of what happens when there's really a systemic failure

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of public health measures. So one very low vaccination rate

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>under ten percent to us uper spread or events that

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>were really sanctioned by the government. And three perhaps maybe cremation,

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're burning particulate matter, would smoke varions.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We know that there's higher complications in areas of pollution

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>or smoke, so it's possible that may also be playing

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a role. But I think the key thing is lack

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of vaccination, and there will ques solution to that. My

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>question also though, it has to do with why a

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>travel ban would be the right thing for the United

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>States right now, given that we do have have COVID

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>running rampant through the U s as well. Is it

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is the variance element, the concern that there could be

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a different strain of COVID brought over from another country.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh for sure. Now we already have here in Michigan

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>where I am at a college graduation h to be

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>one six one seven variant. We've seen some cases in California.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the dominant strains in India, and

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem is it may be somewhat resistant to the

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Fiser vaccine. That's unclear. We're getting some data on that.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And it also seems to be more infectious that it

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>spreads more easily. So there are a lot of you know,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>potential issues here and uh, you know, some of those

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>cases are also being seen in China. So we're nowhere

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.799
<v Speaker 1>done with what's going on. So how does it potentially

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>impact the United States? Well, you know, I think the

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>United States we're going to be okay. You know, we

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we unfortunately about of adults under thirty five had declined

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. They have vaccine hesitancy, so we we have

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to do a little bit better there. One of the reasons,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, we can't mandate scenes generally is the feeling

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's under an emergency use authorization not FDA approved.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So to make people take something that's not FDA approved

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>does potentially cause a problem. So that may be one

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why we can't mandate it, although I will have

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens with that. But I think in

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the US we have about forty going on of adults vaccinated.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to be okay, but I'm not

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sure globally that's going to be the same case. Hey,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Dr les Bader, I'm I'm wondering about if we're going

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to just continue to see you know, a few weeks

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>ago we were talking about what was happening in Brazil.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we're talking about what's happening in India. Is this

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep going from one country to another

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>country because of so many countries aren't vaccinated right now?

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this how the pandemic plays out over the next year? Absolutely,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is exactly what happened, well not exactly,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but very similar to what happened in the Night Spanish flu. Basically,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it went around the country exactly as it did in

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States. You know, we saw New York a

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>year ago as the epicenter and people in the Midwest that, oh,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we're safe now. It hit both coasts and the in

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest. Uh, and then it went from country to country.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That was primarily in World War Two with the troops,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>ships going to Europe and so forth. That probably helped

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>spread it. But I think we're going to see continued

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>multiple waves and unfortunately without vaccination, when you get mutation,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and with mutation you can get resistant viruses, right, which

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is why. Yeah, and we're also talking about booster shots

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and something we maybe we'll get into in the next block.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Ian Sit tight for a second and we'll come back

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to you in just a moment. We are talking with

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ian lust bed Or, Clinical Professor of Medicine and

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>why you lend go Medical Center on the phone up

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>from Michigan. But I do wonder, like, does it ultimately

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have enough vaccinated, does it come back

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to us? I know Dr leus Padre saying we should

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be okay, but I do wonder. I do wonder too,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>especially with all the hesitancy that we're seeing. Right the

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>people who wanted to get vaccinated have already gotten vaccinated.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm having a lot of conversations with people are like,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do I'm not, You're not I am.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I am like a uh in different walks in my life,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and and I'm respecting it because everybody has to make

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the decision they feel comfortable with. But um, it makes

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sense when he gives me under age of thirty five

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>declining vaccine, I get it. I get that number right.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense. Well, let's get right back to it

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with Dr Ian lust Betaor, clinical professor of medicine and

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>why you land going to medical center? Joining us now

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Michigan. Dr LUs Bader, I want

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to just talk about reaction to the vaccine, because it's

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a question that Carol and I have been talking about

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and it's a question we've been asking, and

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people have been asking each other, Hey,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what was your reaction to the vaccine? Why are some

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people having such significant reactions to their second shot or

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>even their first shot and others aren't. And I'll share

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the example of my wife. She got them more dinner shot.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>After the second shot, she was really sick for you know,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>about twelve hours and like nausea, vomiting, And I got

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the visor shot and after my second shot, I was

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I was a key, but it really went away after

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>about thirty six hours. So Charlie Pellent as usual, right

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>right on the money, and you as well, Kim uh So.

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That scenes and people's responses um not only do the

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccines but to the COVID infection itself are very complex

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have a simple answer for you. There's

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some data UM that people who have had the virus

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and then get vaccinated, you know, there's a fair number

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of people who have a symptomatic COVID may have a

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more dramatic response UM and the composition of these vaccines

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>as somewhat complex. You do have this RNA that's at

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>least for the MODERNA and the pleasure vaccines surrounded by

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what's called the liposome or or a lipid coat, and

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>people any vaccine, mumps, MUSS, rebel at, tetanus, singles, vaccine,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these vaccines that we give people typically do

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>cause achiness at the site and fever. I mean, you're

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you're recognizing a foreign object, of foreign response to an invader,

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course the body has a variable response to it.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>What I would say, though, is that most of these

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are really relatively minor limited usually to a day or

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>two or less, and that even people who are on

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>some you know suppression, you know, rumantroid arthritis, crones disease,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>other medications of course, talked to your doctor, seemed to

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do well with it. So my answer would really be

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>individual variation the component of the vaccine. And just like

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a variable response to COVID to do very well, one

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>percent do not. And in some ways it's hard to

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>predict exactly why. Part of it is genetics, but part

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of it is expected. Any vaccine, any foreign substance, you

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>usually get some immune response, and that's good. You want

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>an immune response. But does it mean anything if you

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have some kind of response to a vaccine, if

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't kind of feel anything, does that mean something

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>different in terms of your ability to fight off COVID

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.239
<v Speaker 1>or something some other kind of virus. No, not necessarily

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>send people breathe right through it. I send patients of

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>afterbout doing testing after. We don't really recommend that. We

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really do that. Most of the gum covid exposure

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>shows nuclear capsid antibodies, which means the infection you can

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>and some people, if they're really concerned, check antibodies for

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>spike protein. All the patients I've seen has had the

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>vaccine do show spike protein. We don't do it routinely.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think the data is very good. As

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we said, out have two hundred million shots, only about

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>five cases of people after either both shots or the

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>single shot J and J that is, but the two

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>RNA shots have come down with covid, so pretty effective.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there any data up to now that shows a

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>different reaction or different reactions in general following five or

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>versus moderna because there is that anecdotal sort of thing

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that people say, right, Oh, I hear you know this

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>shot is worse than the other shot, but is there

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>any data to back that up, not that I'm aware of.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're very similar technology, the messenger urn

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>technology with encased in in the liposome. And really, what

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>I would say is, because it's so unpredictable, we should

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not really be asking for one or the other. They're

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all really quite effective. As you have pointed out correctly,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>don't don't get de lax. In other words, we really

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>need two shots, either three or four weeks support for

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>maximal immunity. And that's even a week or two after

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the second shot. You know, J and J somewhat different.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You still have to wait for that. Um, But no,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>having your fever chills, uh does not necessarily make a difference.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>There are some people who just don't FORMANTABOUDI should we

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>see this with hepatitis be actually moms, minsils rebella. You

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can get people several shots and some people just don't

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>forman about It's not quite clear why that is all right,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>good to know, UM, congratulations on the graduation. Thinking it

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>might be your son, but I hope you well. Congratulations engineering,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, really impressive. Yeah, you have a great weekend.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Stay safe, of course. Dr Ian ls Beta, clinical professor

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of Medicine at n y U Land. Going on the

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>phone in Michigan today always kind of provides clarification. Also,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>good to know he's traveling. He is. Yeah, yeah, he's vaccinated.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing that from we are. This is Bloomberg Business

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Another one of our most read stories

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. It's about how President Binds proposed tax

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>hikes are creating a wealth advisor frenzy is getting a

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>little money out there, Tim. It is, especially if you

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of money. Joel Weber is editor at

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, and he joins us on the remote

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn. Laura Davison is a Congressional tax reporter for

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News on the phone from Washington, d C. Joel,

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing has been you know, put into policy yet, Nothing

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>has has been made law yet, but that hasn't stopped

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>people from freaking out and from advisors from playing therapist.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, the freak out has has really begun. Um

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I think everyone is just itching to understand like,

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what could happen, what might happen, what the odds are,

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what they should be doing now, And if you have

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>enough money to have a financial advisor, um, you are

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>calling them, maybe maybe multiple times. And so Laura had

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the great idea to talk to a couple of financial

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>advisors and get their advice for clients right now, and

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura tell us what you learned. So basically what advisors

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>are saying is, you know, hurry up, let's make a plan,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and then we've got to wait and see what Congress

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>actually does. This plan that Biden put up the speak

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to go over a bunch of revisions, a

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of negotiations, and probably is not going to look

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>exactly like what the President proposed. So they're looking to

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>pass some sort of plan, you know, September October, but

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that could slip. So really it is only going to

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>be a couple of months at the end of the

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>year before these tax increases likely take effects. So wealth

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>advisors are saying, look, if you are going to have

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to uh sell any assets, take any capital gains, and

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>pay taxes on those games, let's do that now versus

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the next couple of years because that capital

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gains rate, you know, it will likely increase in its

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>now Biden has proposed almost so they're saying, hey, you know,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>if you've got some shares that you're gonna sell, let's

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>sell them now, pay the pay the tax at the

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lower rate, or even saying, if you have some some

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>assets that have really appreciated something you think, like Tesla stock,

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin, go ahead, sell those, buy it back, and

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>then you've locked in those games at the lower rate,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because who knows what the future beholds. But it does

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>still seem like, Laura, there is even uncertainty in doing

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that because you and are calling Ben's spend Steverman in

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the piece raised the possibility if there could be even

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>retroactive changes. Correct, So this is the risk here. You know,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Congress could say this is totally within their purview. You know, hey,

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the tax increases already took effect January one, which would

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>mean any sort of planning would would essentially be moot

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and you could actually end up hurting

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself here. Both Biden advisors as well as congressional Democratic

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>advisors have said that they don't like doing this, but

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this isn't their plan. But you know, there's always that

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>risk out there until until the bill is signed. The

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>thing I think is interesting is what about the I

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>R S. Uh putting more scrutiny on the wealthy when

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to their taxes kind of taken maybe a

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>deeper luck. President Biden has proposed eight billion for the

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I R S to strength and enforcement in the coming decade.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>How word are they about that, Laura? This could be

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge sea change thee the wealthy, and really taxpayers

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at every level have seen audits drop precipitously really in

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the past decade as the I R S has had

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>its budget cut. Um they're basically proposing to double or

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>even triple the i r S enforcement budget, bringing new auditors,

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing new data tools to find fraud. And also one

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is interesting is having for for bank accounts, having

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the inflows and outflows from bank accounts reported

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to the I r S, so they have a little

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more visibility on how much money investors should be reporting.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>This would really be a sea change. And uh, you know,

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have a wealth advisor's probably also a good

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>idea to make sure you have a good account into

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at tax lawyer on hand as well. Right, make sure

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he's doing the right And all those people right now

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are just like the financial advisors like, great, I haven't

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>heard from you forever. Thanks for picking up the phone

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and calling me. We'll come up with a plan now, jerk,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But so so Laura, I want to have a better

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding of this. So that's a hurry hurry weight strategy

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're basically um advising. And and are there rainy

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>day implicated sations to this, Like are they saying like

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't invest right now, like hold off until we know

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, like take us through the various ways

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're actually trying to coach people. So basically they're

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>telling people, you know, continue as you were if you

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>had a you know, a plan, uh, you know, continue

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with that plan. But if you're looking to sell something,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's do it sooner rather than later. Get

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the deal structured so that it can happen by New

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Year's Eve if you want to go ahead and execute

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on that. Um, you know, there's there's really so much

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty right now. Basically everyone every adviser saying, you know,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything yet, let's just you know, make create

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>some options for ourselves. Look, at different different planning tools

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we can make a decision once we kind

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of have a sense of what Congress is going to

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do here. Okay, So I want to also understand, like

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>another element, and this part isn't in your current reporting,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'd like to understand, like, you know, a state

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>tax was was potentially part of this first phase of talking.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>They seems like they've tabled that, Like what what are

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>these financial advisors? What do they have to say about

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this the likelihood of a potential of state tax down

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the down the road. Yeah, so the state tax right

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now doesn't kick in until you know you have eleven

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>point seven million dollars at death or twice that if

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're married. Um, Biden left that out of

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the plan. Um likely because there's some Democrats in the

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate who would not support lowering that threshold. But he

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>did campaign on bringing that threshold down to three and

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a half a million dollars, so a lot more people

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would be affected by that. That is one of those

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>elements where you could see, you know, if if moderates

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and and progressives are negotiating over different elements, that's one

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>area right that progressive and say, hey, we really want

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to get this in here. It raises a bunch of money.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It would help Biden pay for a lot of his

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>spending proposals. So that's one area that's still in play.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The Tax Law Jobs Act, of seen the Trump tax cuts,

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>those are still pretty fresh. So what did advisors say

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to to you about the idea of people just kind

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of doing nothing and perhaps even if there are changes,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>doing nothing and maybe even waiting for a new administration

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to to revert to rules back to today. So says

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it will be other thing that that advisors are really

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at is, you know, if Republicans sweep in, you know,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do we basically just have a sea change back in

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the other direction, which as we've seen, you know, with

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the use of reconciliation, this partisan tool to get built

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>through Congress. You know, if we keep having the pendulum

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>swing one way or another, uh, we could see policy

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>changes on tax and anything, you know, every four years

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>changing significantly. Um. And this is something that you know,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>really has frustrated tax lawyers for enable. They're just finally

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>getting all the details from the Tax Cuts and Jobs

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Act into place, and now they basically have to totally

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>undo them and all the advice they had given their

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>clients totally goes out the window. It's it's very, very

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>confusing and hectic. Well, the freak at the Frenzy says

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, Laura that the wealthy do expect some change,

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>even if the political process may be tough, they ultimately

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>do expect they're going to be paying more taxes. Is

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that a fair assessment? Taxes? Uh, more likely than not

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up, Which which taxes? How much?

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to be affected? That's what's going to be

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>negotiated over the next several months. And you know who

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>makes money? Long wait, the financial advisors, right, and the

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>lawyers too. Listen. It's a great story. And I feel like,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jelly put taxes in a story here on

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and like everybody wants to read it. Yeah. The

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the amount of information that we're going to

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be consuming on this, like we're we were all armchair

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks for the pandemic, you know, on everything about the virus,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>about vaccines, and now we're entering this new phase where

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, now we have a new administration, new stuff,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, step up in basis is

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be like this thing that everyone is gonna

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>want to know about. So we're just gonna be watching

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this so closely. It is such a core competency story

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg and was owned this for the months to

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>come such and I'm sure we'll be reading more more

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>from Laurada like every day. Just keep it coming, Laura

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>explaining it all to us. Laura Davison, thank you so much,

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Congressional tax reporter at Bloomberg News. She's with us on

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the phone in DC. Chill Weber, Editor Bloomberg Business Week,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have a great week, and on the remote act Sass

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio the

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Big Take Today it's a Bloomberg exclusive that you

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of need to be focusing on, and it's a

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>story that only we have and today it's about the

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>seemingly NonStop behind the scenes drama between Apollo Global Management's

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>billionaire co founders and what it means for investors. Heather

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pearl Burg is a private equity reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Joins us on the phone from Washington, d C. Heather,

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this is quite a read. I can see why it

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is the big take today. What has been happening behind

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenes as Leon Black has been has exited Apollo

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>well Land. Black is sort of a known classicist, I

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>mean named the firm Apollo, and it's really starting to

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>look a lot like a classic Breek tragedy. I mean,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you have the drama, the revenge, the power grab, and

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the center of it. Is this you know, four

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty five billion dollar investing powerhouse, UM that's

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>really had a tumultuous year or so, and Leon Black

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was just um really sort of scathe, scrutinized for his

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>ties to Jeffrey Epstein for most of last year moving

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>into this year, eventually sort of forced to step aside,

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and you had his two potential successors, Mark Rowan and

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Harris. And Mark Rowan took the reins. Harris had

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of failed bid to become CEO, and since

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>then he's really been sidelined and at a bare knuckle

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>firm like Apollo. That doesn't look good, is it? It

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds a little surprising too, is it. Well? You had

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>these three men who were sort of leading different parts

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the business, Josh Harris was always in charge of

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>private equity. Now Apollo made this grab for at seeing

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the huge insurance company that has made it sort of

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the envy of Wall Street for getting such huge fees,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and private equity is certainly a smaller part of their business.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Um and and Harris was just being kind of slowly

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>relinquished of duty. Is shopping for a place in Florida

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>for aman who was sort of a known workaholic and

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>really um micromanage into the nitty gritty of deals in

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the New York office. He wouldn't be moving to Florida

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>if he really had his pulse on the business. What

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do employees who work under Harris or have worked under

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris think of that, because there are some pretty jarring

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>anecdotes in here about what they think. Well, he wasn't

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>known to be an easy man to work for, and

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that's been sort of widely reported in the past. But yeah,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we did. We did. Hear some pales of his underlings

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>humming ding dong the witch is dead from the Wizard

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of Oz. So I guess they were relieved. That's a

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>little harsh to say, right right, yeah, exactly exactly when

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about it. As you you write and report,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean this is an individual, Harris, that is,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who has spent you report years positioning himself and becoming

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a more public face of the company at conferences and

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in the media, you know, kind of setting the stage.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting to see how things play out. UM.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And and Leon Black, we know has taken a big

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>step back. But what is his involvement? What are you

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>hearing as things change and evolve? Well, he really is

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to be involved in any investing activity anymore.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, he cited health issues. He did there was

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a story that he had kind of called into one

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>meeting UM that was quickly reported by the media. And

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, there's just so much scrutiny over his

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>involvements that he'll probably stay out of it for a

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>little while. I mean, there's some speculation that he might

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>come back eventually, but nobody really knows in what form

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>or what that would look like. I always think about

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>all of the stories that you and your team and

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>others have report up Bloomberg. You know, there's key senior people.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>They are often crucial when it comes to raising new funds,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>creating new funds. The relationships that they've had for years

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>that allow them to raise new money to invest. So

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how does Harris having a much smaller role and maybe

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially new role at some point, how does that impact

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the firm which is a publicly traded firm at some

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>point um you will see how that shakes out. I mean,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he definitely has a relationships with big limited partners, just

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like all of the founders will have their own relationships

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with people, and and Josh Harris is still a key

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>man on the largest ever private equity funds that Apollo

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>had raised, which you know they haven't finished investing yet.

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to leave, which you know people

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>are speculating he will in the next year, So that

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>would trigger a big problem for Apollo. I mean, investors

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>would essentially have to sign off on the fund continuing

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to do deals, so investing would pause or maybe even stop.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And I Apolo certainly doesn't want that to happen, So

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>does have a little bit of leverage at the moment too. Yeah,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Stacks after that this year, Hey, Heather, what did you

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>learn specifically about what Harris is doing in Florida and

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>has been doing during the pandemic and indications just in

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds or so that he's thinking about making

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>more permanent routes there. Um, he's a spot of a

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of different nice restaurants riding his bike around town

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Phone Beach area. Um, you know, I think

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who have sort of fled

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City in the pandemic. And um, you know,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>we had definitely heard that he's looking to buy a

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>place down there. Apollo's opening offices down there, So it

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't the craziest thing along with other firms to kind

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of help retain talent um. But for someone like Josh,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this would be a sign that if he

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell down Apollo shares, taxes wouldn't be as

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>much as of an issue as they were in New York.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if we see him a lot more at

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sports events too, as that opens up, because of course

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got Harris Blitzer Sports and Entertainment that he's set

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>up with Blackstones David Blitzer. Hey, great reporting as always,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and that of course is the big take story. You

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can find out more at Bloomberg and Bloomberg dot com.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm roc journal Yeah, but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>who's honey, Please, I'll do the right rivel. I want

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to drive, Just drive, baby, it's the questions drying. This

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the Globe un Radio. Just about

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes left in today's trading session. Charlie Pellett putting

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it so perfectly a late day fade here on this Friday.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We are definitely off our best levels of the session

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and definitely off record highs for the broader market. Let's

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>get to it with James Chuck Mark. He is back

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with us, partner in portfolio analyst. He focuses on tech

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stocks at the asset management from Clockwise Capital. He's back

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone in Miami. James, good to

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. What a week tech stocks,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>This is your world. I'm guessing you might not have

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten too much sleep this week, but sum it up

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for us if you would. If there is kind of

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a big overarching theme from some of the names that

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>reported this week, yeah, thanks for having me. So. We

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>saw all the big companies reporting this week, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft,

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think the big overarching takeaway from those is

0:27:55.840 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that these companies are proving to be increasingly essential to

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, and the results certainly approved that that not

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>only are they essential way businesses operate and consumers, but

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they're essentially the new utilities, and that essential infrastructure that

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they've built is something that's going to be virtually impossible

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to derail for the foreseeable future. And the new companies

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that are coming into the market UM are are predicated

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on leveraging the infrastructure of those companies have built. So

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, you know, they're here to stay and

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>very little they can stop their momentum. That said, James,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like it was kind of the tale

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of two different types of companies, the big tech companies

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>versus the small tech companies. I mean, you saw what

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>happened with Facebook's report and Alphabets report, Microsoft's report, and

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>then of course Amazon's report, and at the same time

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Spotify, to Pinterest into Twitter. So so

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>where's the divergence there? What's going on? Yeah, what we're

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now, I mean the market has gone absolutely

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>straight up for over the last year. Every single thing

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that was thrown at investors was dismissed, you know, depressed

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings for UM, regulatory risks, the election uncertainty. You know,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we had a couple of blips here and there, but

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially gone straight up. And then now you tack

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on inflation concerns as we look into the coming weeks

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and months. Obviously, some of those stocks that you just named,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're higher multiple stocks and more sensitive. But ultimately,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>when you do look at the underlying performance of those companies,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly spot you know, Spotify, that's one that we actually

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>added to on the pull back because of their audio

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>platforms that they're building and and positioning we think, you know,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>relative to Apple Music. Um, but the results clearly are strong.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But the multiples attributed to these stocks maybe pricing in

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and increased discount factor. As you know, we have some

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>outstanding risks as we look full of So I'm gonna

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>go through a quick laundry list. Apple. Did you add

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to the position, did you reduce? What's your take there? Well,

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you the what we did. What when we

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>turned into the the new year. One of the things

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that we did was we knew that the market was

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>going into a rotation trade, you know, going into the

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>travel space and airlines and things of that nature. But

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>those businesses we didn't think are sustainable. So what we

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>did was we sized up our highest conviction names like Apple,

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like a Whirlpool, like an Amazon, like a Facebook. You know,

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>gross them up to tensive position, so huge sizable weights

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>within the portfolio given our conviction of those names. So

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't sold any, but they remained super concentrated as

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the book. So that's so, that's true. So

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's Apple, Amazon, who else? Basebook, Whirlpool top four. Yeah,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it's an over ten percent weights teature. Okay, how does

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year look like? I mean, here

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we are at a point where equity markets are just

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>blowing past expectations that analysts sat at the beginning of

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the year are already. Um these are high expectations that

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>these that these companies have to deliver on. Are they

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to do it? I think these short

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>answers to that is yes, because technology can and will

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>always move forward. So no matter what type of market

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>clips that we see the move. The world is moving

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>towards the cloud, and the world is moving towards flexibility

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and and enhance productivity, and any businesses that allow you

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to augment and optimize um that productivity and flexibility by

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>via companies that either build the cloud or leverage the

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>cloud will continue to benefit. But uh, you know, from

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a macro sense, you know we do have calls for concern.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You know when you whenever you open up the economy,

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>when you shut it down and open it up with

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a flip of a switch, you know there is going

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a huge bottleneck on the supply side, so inflation.

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Even though the companies that we are investing are deflation deflationary,

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which gives us confidence in them, but we will have

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>likely have you know, inflationary risks in your term and

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these stocks you know that do have high growth,

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>super high growth and high multiples associated with them could

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly be under pressure. You know. The analogy we make

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like a traffic accident. Um. You know,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>even though you clear the accident, you know it will

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>still take a lot of time for the the traffic

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to clear up. Um. And that's kind of how we're

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the supply constraints of the world and what

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the implications on pricing and and inflation and associated interest rate.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey James, how do you make sense of kind of

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>old economy new economy forward versus tesla or you know,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>WORL Pole that's in old economy, but they definitely benefited

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. We've talked with the CEO on air

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and he says folks have been at home, cooking and

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>spending more time at home. He doesn't anticipate that's going

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to change anytime soon, that consumer habits don't change that quickly.

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's an old economy company versus you know, an

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon where we can shop online and do things differently.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you make sense? How do you make investment

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>decisions because you've got a little bit of both in

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your portfolios. Yeah, it's it's uh, you know, Whirlpool Like

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. It's not really a tech company per se

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the traditional sense, but it's a savior in my

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>house if I've got a dishwasher though and washing machine. Well,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the changes they are making on the production side, you know,

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they're getting much more efficient in their manufacturing capabilities and

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have been the low cost uh manufacturer of

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>appliances and and the more efficiencies are able to drive

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on that, they only be able to improve their efforts

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>turnover and in turn, um, the appreciation of machines and

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been seeing that. But as far as a new

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>economy versus old really boiled. The way we look at

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it as boils down to their d n A. You know,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are they willing to make the sacrifices that may cause

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>near term pain in terms of margin and growth, you know,

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to to be able to adapt or um are they

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be stuck in their own ways and and

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and trying to peek out as much cash flow as possible.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, a company like Intel, for example, they're actually

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to rip the band aid off and become something

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>new UM a manufacturing company that could ultimately hurt their

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>profit performance over the near term. So it really boils

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>down to are if it is a legacy company, are

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>they willing to adapt. If the answer is no, then

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they're out. If the answer is yes, then we'll take

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>a look. And as far as the new company is though,

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's are they aligned to take advantage of the cloud

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and be able to you know, grow their customer base

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>independent of geodication and and and continue to um pass

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on ultimately consumer surplus and in the in the and

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with respect to time savings, because ultimately, anything that saves

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you time. So if you look at any company that

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is succeeding right now, they save businesses or Constoomer's time

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in some way, shape or form Alright, we're gonna leave

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it on that note, James, nice to check in with

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You have a wonderful weekend. James Chuck, Marky's partner and

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>technology analyst at Clockwise Capital, on the phone from Miami.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Global News