1 00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:10,920 Speaker 2: President Trump pushed back against doubts over his seriousness on 3 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 2: the tariff deadline. He said the August first deadline won't 4 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:16,959 Speaker 2: be extended, while hinting on progress towards a deal with 5 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 2: the European Union. Joining us now to discuss this in 6 00:00:20,040 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 2: more detail is John Clark, a former EU trade negotiator 7 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,480 Speaker 2: and Director of International Affairs at the European Commission. John, 8 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 2: thank you for joining us on such a busy morning 9 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:32,600 Speaker 2: when it comes to news about trade. How are you 10 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 2: reading the latest comments from the US and the EU 11 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,519 Speaker 2: on this? Does it sound like they're close to a 12 00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 2: deal to you? 13 00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:42,040 Speaker 3: I think this is the most difficult negotiation in memory, 14 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:44,199 Speaker 3: frankly for the europan Union, and I would not want to 15 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 3: be any trade negotiator on this one. The go posts 16 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:51,319 Speaker 3: are moving all the time, leaves negotiating with a gun 17 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 3: against its head of twenty percent or fifty percent tariff 18 00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 3: in August, depending on what daily week it is. There 19 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 3: are doubts I think whether any any deal that Trump 20 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:05,959 Speaker 3: incs will be actually honored. And then the Commission is 21 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:09,520 Speaker 3: very divided about whether it should stick to principles not 22 00:01:09,640 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 3: accept anything which is w two illegal or be quote 23 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:15,319 Speaker 3: unquote pragmatic and go for a quick thirty deal of 24 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,240 Speaker 3: the kind that the British did and the end men 25 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:21,759 Speaker 3: the states are also quite divided, and then we've got 26 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 3: the whole Ukraine dimension, which which in the background. So 27 00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:28,559 Speaker 3: it's a very difficult situation. There is there's no white 28 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,040 Speaker 3: smoke coming out of the bussles at the moment, but 29 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 3: there have been a few hints and signs that a 30 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:42,119 Speaker 3: deal may be reached today or over overnight tomorrow, which 31 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 3: would basically basically be EU accepting that there will be 32 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:50,840 Speaker 3: a ten percent tariff more or less across the board, 33 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 3: carve outs for airbus or aircraft, aerospace and wines and 34 00:01:57,400 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 3: spirits the biggest sivily weather that can be a carve out, 35 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 3: and no tariffs for cars and pharmaceuticals which have been 36 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:09,840 Speaker 3: almost important to several member states. So this is a 37 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 3: very difficult negotiation. I think nobody will be happy with 38 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:17,959 Speaker 3: the result. But I don't think the EU is willing 39 00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 3: to go to a full blown trade war with the 40 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 3: USA because that would that would end any any prospect 41 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:29,280 Speaker 3: of the US sticking in there with support for Ukraine. 42 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:32,480 Speaker 1: You point in some of the complexity of this arrangement. 43 00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: We've been speaking to our reporters who've been giving details 44 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:39,280 Speaker 1: on some of those carveat negotiations that have been happening 45 00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 1: as well. I mean, are those is that going to 46 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 1: be enough for EU member states? If there are managed 47 00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:48,680 Speaker 1: to be successful on car utes for wine and spirits 48 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 1: and aircraft parts. As we've been discussing, the car is 49 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: issue seems even more complicated. 50 00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:56,400 Speaker 3: No, I don't think that would that would be be satisfactory. 51 00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:00,160 Speaker 3: The auto sector is very important, The pharmaceutical sectory is 52 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:03,239 Speaker 3: very important, and I think at least one of those 53 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:08,240 Speaker 3: sectors would need to get a carve out zero beauty 54 00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 3: exporting to the USA if none of them are there, 55 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 3: I don't think the EE you could accept a deal. 56 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:17,799 Speaker 2: That's interesting that you mentioned that Trump did mention that 57 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:21,920 Speaker 2: two hundred percent tariff that threat on pharmaceuticals, but he 58 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 2: did mention a longer timeline when he threatened that, saying 59 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 2: companies will have a year a year and a half 60 00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:30,799 Speaker 2: to move production to avoid that kind of tariff. But 61 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,080 Speaker 2: I want to car maybe dig into a little deeper 62 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 2: on the auto situation. There were some reporting that some 63 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 2: German car makers would be given maybe some reprieves such 64 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 2: as BMW, Mercedes and Volkswagen who produced some cars in 65 00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 2: the US, they'll be given maybe a quota of some 66 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 2: terraff free imports. What's the latest reading on the discussions 67 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 2: around the auto sector. 68 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 3: Well, I'm not privy to the discussions that they're in 69 00:03:56,360 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 3: the so called tunnel now in GRN secrecy, but there 70 00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 3: are lots of ways in which you can carve out 71 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 3: craft a deal on autos which would, as you say, 72 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:11,880 Speaker 3: involve boosting production in the USA, which you know BMW 73 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:15,560 Speaker 3: is quite able to do. Volkswagen as well. The Japanese 74 00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 3: have been doing it with Hayundai and offsetting that against 75 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,839 Speaker 3: increased imports from Europe. So I mean anything as possible. 76 00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: What about the question of the tech rules. This is 77 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: something that Donald Trump has brought up again and again, 78 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:30,800 Speaker 1: and even last night while he was saying that the 79 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:34,040 Speaker 1: EU and Ursula von Zlin had been quote very nice recently, 80 00:04:34,120 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 1: he still pointed to some of the fines being issued 81 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:41,320 Speaker 1: to big tech companies in the from the US, but 82 00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: by the EU. Now, our conversations with the European Commission 83 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:47,640 Speaker 1: have said that they're not looking to change the rules 84 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:51,000 Speaker 1: Stefan Serjean I told us that only around a week ago. 85 00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 1: Is that something that could a compromise. Do you think 86 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: be found around that where the EU could be seen 87 00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:59,920 Speaker 1: to be giving something on that area to the US 88 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 1: without necessarily giving up on its framework. 89 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:06,000 Speaker 3: No, I don't. I think on this the the EU 90 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 3: will will not waive it's it's legal requirements and its 91 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 3: enforcement requirements on on on big tech, on on data platforms. 92 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 3: I mean, only last week the EU find Apple five 93 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 3: hundred million euros for anti competitive behavior in terms of 94 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 3: access to its it's it's apps site. I mean, I 95 00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:34,120 Speaker 3: think that's a that's a very clear sign that the 96 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 3: EU is not going to give up on its the 97 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 3: Digital Service Act or other tech regulations. I think that 98 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:43,880 Speaker 3: would be a bridge too far, and it's hard to 99 00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:50,400 Speaker 3: see what kind of sweetheart understanding could be made otherwise. 100 00:05:50,440 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 3: So I don't think this area is going to be 101 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 3: featured very strongly in any EU U S deal. 102 00:05:57,839 --> 00:05:59,840 Speaker 2: Can you talk to us about a little bit about 103 00:05:59,880 --> 00:06:03,920 Speaker 2: how you're viewing, you know, the broader trade situation within 104 00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:07,359 Speaker 2: the EU or sorry outside you with partners other than us. 105 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:10,440 Speaker 2: Do you think that this is putting more strain on 106 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 2: their relationship with China, for example. 107 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:17,960 Speaker 3: Well, that's one of the big, big unknowns that I've 108 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 3: been writing about quite a bit and commenting on. You know, 109 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:24,719 Speaker 3: I would be very unhappy if any EU US deal 110 00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:30,479 Speaker 3: included commitments to bash bash China in any kind of 111 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,039 Speaker 3: W two illegal manner. Obviously the US want the EU 112 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 3: to align with it in hitting China in whatever ways 113 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:42,799 Speaker 3: it can. That would be very, very unwise and dangerous approach. 114 00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:45,120 Speaker 3: I think the EU should not be forced to choose 115 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:48,200 Speaker 3: between America and China, not least because we have a 116 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 3: summit coming up EU China in a few days, and 117 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 3: I think we don't want to see a breakdown in 118 00:06:55,200 --> 00:06:58,719 Speaker 3: EU China relations at this particular point in time. 119 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,440 Speaker 1: Going back to the negotiations with the US, I'm wondering 120 00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:06,920 Speaker 1: if what you would see as being the red lines 121 00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 1: that the EU won't cross to get a deal. Obviously 122 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:12,240 Speaker 1: there's a lot of pressure and we're told there is progress. 123 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 1: But I just wonder, from your experience and negotiating on 124 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,360 Speaker 1: behalf of the EU, what what issues you think that 125 00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:20,520 Speaker 1: could see all of this fall apart over. 126 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 3: Well, I think there are there are two two red lines, 127 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 3: perhaps two and a half one is that I don't 128 00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:32,800 Speaker 3: think the European Union would accept to give the USA 129 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 3: any preferential market access for US exports. That would be 130 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:41,920 Speaker 3: clearly illegal. And the w t O and the EU does, 131 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 3: I think still care about its credibility and as a 132 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 3: defender of multilateralism and the kind of international rules. So 133 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 3: I think that's that's not going to happen. That that's 134 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 3: that would be a red line for the European Union. 135 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:55,600 Speaker 3: I think the second one is, as I said earlier, 136 00:07:56,920 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 3: the EU will not, in my opinion, accept a deal 137 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 3: in which there is no improved access for pharmaceuticals or cars, 138 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 3: one or the other, perhaps not both, but one or 139 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 3: the others. I think they will demand good treatment for 140 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 3: either their farmer or their car exports. And then thirdly 141 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 3: that the half is that as I said, I don't 142 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 3: think the EU would accept to agree with the Americans 143 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:32,080 Speaker 3: any kind of again w two illegal actions against China. 144 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 1: John, thank you very much for joining us this morning, 145 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:37,720 Speaker 1: John Clark, their former EU Trade Negotiations director Franchashal Farres 146 00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 1: at the European Commission. We appreciate your insight as we're 147 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:43,040 Speaker 1: watching for the latest news out of those trade talks.