1 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:09,160 Speaker 1: Well, joining me now is Rohit Chopra. Rohit was the 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:14,400 Speaker 1: former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Board bureaux FPB. 3 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: This was an agency that sprung up after the financial crisis, 4 00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:19,920 Speaker 1: during the heat of the Great Recession. In many ways, 5 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:24,680 Speaker 1: it was the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren, and fairly or 6 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 1: unfairly maybe that is why it has been a polarizing agency. 7 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:31,480 Speaker 1: Just getting it off the ground ended up being a 8 00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:37,880 Speaker 1: partisan effort. It really is a not a partisan operation 9 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 1: at all. It is meant literally what it says consumer 10 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:46,160 Speaker 1: protection in it mostly when it comes to financial instruments, 11 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 1: whether it's credit card statements, whether it's your the small 12 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:53,320 Speaker 1: print and loans and so it is one of those 13 00:00:53,720 --> 00:01:00,520 Speaker 1: agencies that if the public understood everything about it, they 14 00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: generally would be in favor. But this has been one 15 00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:07,680 Speaker 1: of these agencies that is that it's struggled to get 16 00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:10,399 Speaker 1: to sort of take root in Washington, and I kind 17 00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:13,679 Speaker 1: of want to start there, Rohitt, before we get to 18 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 1: sort of what regulate regulating the economy should look like 19 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:21,520 Speaker 1: and who does it and all of those things, because obviously, 20 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:25,440 Speaker 1: with the President's attempts to sort of get whatever, get 21 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:30,200 Speaker 1: control of the FED Board, means all of this is 22 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:34,200 Speaker 1: uh is part of this conversation and the entire You know, 23 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:37,200 Speaker 1: when when Democrats have had the presidency, what for the 24 00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:40,240 Speaker 1: two times that the cf PB has been in existence, 25 00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 1: it had real staff, and the two times that are 26 00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:46,959 Speaker 1: Republicans were in charge of the executive branch, it was 27 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:50,800 Speaker 1: not taken seriously. So let me start there, rohit why 28 00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 1: has it been so difficult for this agency to sort 29 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:58,520 Speaker 1: of take root in Washington, to beyond being seen as 30 00:01:58,520 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 1: a partisan instrument. 31 00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know, you say the CFPB and its 32 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:10,440 Speaker 2: mission has been politically polarizing. The funny thing is that 33 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 2: that's only true in Washington, DC. There is nothing really controversial. 34 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 2: And actually when you ask people, no matter whether they 35 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 2: are in a blue state or red state, it's pretty 36 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 2: common that they have a lot of skepticism about how 37 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:32,680 Speaker 2: powerful financial institutions are treating them, whether it is the 38 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:36,359 Speaker 2: outrageous interest rates on their credit cards, how they are 39 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:40,959 Speaker 2: treated in terms of mysterious junk fees that pop up 40 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 2: in their life, to often their sense that the game 41 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:49,919 Speaker 2: is really rigged against them when it comes to getting 42 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 2: ahead financially. So of course there is going to be 43 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 2: very deep pocketed interests who not only didn't want this 44 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 2: agency ever to be formed, but have wanted to kill 45 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:04,519 Speaker 2: it from day one. 46 00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:07,480 Speaker 1: What is the agency? Let's let's back check. Let's assume, 47 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:11,360 Speaker 1: because I do think that there there are. But it's like, yeah, 48 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 1: I know what you're talking about, but tell me more 49 00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 1: about this agency, like to explain. You know, there's a 50 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,080 Speaker 1: great you know, explain it to me like I've never 51 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: been to Washington, and I you know what what the 52 00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: intent and then the practice of this agency? Give me 53 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: the intent? First, Well, there's a lot of. 54 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 2: Law on the books to make sure that when you 55 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 2: get that credit card statement or when you get that mortgage, 56 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 2: you are not cheated. You are supposed to be disclosed 57 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:49,280 Speaker 2: the key terms, and there's not supposed to be any 58 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:52,480 Speaker 2: funny business to rip you off. But you know what 59 00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 2: we saw, Chuck. 60 00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 1: What is funny business? I mean, I understand you know 61 00:03:55,560 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: you say it, but give me an example of something that. 62 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 2: Well, let's say you have a credit report and I 63 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 2: put on your credit report that you owe me twenty 64 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:10,600 Speaker 2: six hundred dollars for an unpaid auto loan, and it 65 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 2: turns out you don't that you already paid it. But 66 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:17,680 Speaker 2: I'm going to coerce you into paying it by saying 67 00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 2: I'm going to keep this on your credit report unless 68 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:24,440 Speaker 2: you pay me. Or let's say that you have refinanced 69 00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:29,640 Speaker 2: your mortgage, but the old mortgage company says that you 70 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 2: still have a balance with them. These are just basic 71 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:36,880 Speaker 2: laws to make sure that you cannot be bullied and 72 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,600 Speaker 2: that you cannot be ripped off. And most of it 73 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:43,159 Speaker 2: is pretty common sense. But what we found in the 74 00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 2: years leading up to the financial crisis was that the 75 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 2: agencies that were supposed to be enforcing it weren't doing anything. 76 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:56,680 Speaker 1: Who were those agencies FDIC, It was a long list, 77 00:04:56,839 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 1: but the top of the list was the Federal Result 78 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: Board itself. That the Federal Reserve Board should have been 79 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 1: a regulatory body. 80 00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 2: Oh it was. It had all the power to regulate 81 00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 2: subprime mortgages, it had all the power to regulate credit cards, 82 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:16,719 Speaker 2: but it didn't. And actually there was a host of 83 00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:21,240 Speaker 2: other agencies, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the 84 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:25,440 Speaker 2: bank regulators like the FDIIC, and an obscure one called 85 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:30,720 Speaker 2: the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Nobody was 86 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 2: fulfilling their responsibilities because consumer protection was last on their 87 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:38,680 Speaker 2: list that they were given from Congress. 88 00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:45,160 Speaker 1: Well, what explain where they were whiffing? Like what I mean? 89 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 1: Because I remember, you know, in many ways, Elizabeth Warren's 90 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 1: political career grew out of the financial crisis, right she 91 00:05:52,040 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 1: was sort of this expert on these issues that many 92 00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: members of the media would put on and she started 93 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: getting tracked on this and she was pushing for this agency. 94 00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 1: Is it something that there were It was too spread out, 95 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:12,040 Speaker 1: like one agency was looking at credit reports, one agency 96 00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:14,799 Speaker 1: was looking at loans, one agency was looking at credit 97 00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:17,880 Speaker 1: card statements, which are different from larger loans, or what 98 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: was it exactly? 99 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 2: It was spread out and there was not enough enforcement teeth. 100 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 2: So what the Congress did is consolidated it and put 101 00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 2: forth some real powers, including taking some of these big 102 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:36,520 Speaker 2: financial institutions to court to halt them when they are 103 00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:42,360 Speaker 2: abusing consumers, to get consumers immediate refunds, and to make 104 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:47,119 Speaker 2: them really pay rather than just sweep it under the rug. 105 00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:52,159 Speaker 2: And the record is one that has uncovered some pretty 106 00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:58,120 Speaker 2: big scandals, the Wells Fargo fake account scandal, illegal auto repossessions, 107 00:06:58,160 --> 00:07:03,159 Speaker 2: systemic errors on creditors, student loan abuses, and these are 108 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:07,159 Speaker 2: some of the things that I think Americans are pretty 109 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 2: sick and tired of dealing with. But once you have 110 00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 2: some real focus, a lot of that was cleaned up. 111 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:14,680 Speaker 2: In the mark. 112 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 1: There's a big financial institution in quick that I believe 113 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 1: you had levied a huge fine on and they have 114 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,840 Speaker 1: since the case was thrown out. Is that correct? 115 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 2: Well, it's actually more interesting than that, which is that 116 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 2: lots of companies were subject to orders that they agreed to. 117 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 2: These were settlements, and now routinely the new leadership of 118 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:47,640 Speaker 2: the CFPB is ripping up those settlements and telling companies 119 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:49,520 Speaker 2: they now have a pardon. 120 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:53,680 Speaker 1: So give me an example of a big one and 121 00:07:53,720 --> 00:07:56,120 Speaker 1: what the settlement was about and what the money was 122 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: going to be. 123 00:07:57,160 --> 00:08:01,040 Speaker 2: Well, one that really bugs me is is related to 124 00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:04,640 Speaker 2: Navy Federal Credit Union. This is not a credit union 125 00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 2: that most people bank with, but one that serves a 126 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 2: lot of military service members, not just in their family event, 127 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:17,560 Speaker 2: and they were caught in a years long overdraft fee scheme. 128 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 2: They agreed to pay substantial penalties and frankly refunds to 129 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:29,160 Speaker 2: all the people they cheated, but they were able to 130 00:08:29,480 --> 00:08:32,280 Speaker 2: lobby themselves out of that agreement. 131 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:37,559 Speaker 1: Is the Treasury Secretary, the acting CFPB head right now 132 00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: is that what is he so. 133 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:41,320 Speaker 2: Well, after I was fired, he was put in and 134 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:44,920 Speaker 2: then we don't know exactly what happened. Elon Musk maybe 135 00:08:44,960 --> 00:08:47,760 Speaker 2: got involved, and now it is RUSS vote. 136 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:49,599 Speaker 1: Oh, the budget directors in charge of this. 137 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:50,680 Speaker 2: Now that is right. 138 00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,520 Speaker 1: This was supposed to be an agency that was a 139 00:08:55,600 --> 00:09:00,559 Speaker 1: derivative of the FED. Which what would that have meant 140 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:02,439 Speaker 1: in the Executive Branch ORG chart. 141 00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, so all the bank regulatory agencies, Congress has tried 142 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:12,160 Speaker 2: to keep them a little bit separated from the political 143 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 2: football of Congress, right, and so they all have dedicated funding. 144 00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:22,360 Speaker 2: They all are subjected to lots of oversight, but they have, 145 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 2: just like the FED, their own budget line to draw 146 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:31,199 Speaker 2: funds for because we have seen how special interests are 147 00:09:31,240 --> 00:09:36,200 Speaker 2: able to hijack that process in order to stop oversight 148 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:37,240 Speaker 2: of their industries. 149 00:09:38,600 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 1: You're actually uniquely suited to answer this question because one 150 00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:45,440 Speaker 1: of the arguments that some Republicans made against starting this 151 00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:50,439 Speaker 1: agency is, well, what we have the FTC. You've actually 152 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:54,720 Speaker 1: served on the FTC, I believe, so what's the difference. 153 00:09:55,280 --> 00:09:58,240 Speaker 2: Well, it's a weird argument in my view, because the 154 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:03,760 Speaker 2: FTC has always been banned from bringing enforcement actions against 155 00:10:03,880 --> 00:10:08,760 Speaker 2: banks and guess what industry is involved in offering financial 156 00:10:08,840 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 2: services to consumers' banks, So it's it is a little 157 00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 2: bit weird. And in fact, the FTC is also supposed 158 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:22,800 Speaker 2: to be policing everything from horse racing to pharmaceuticals and more. 159 00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:26,640 Speaker 2: And Chuck, I'm totally open. I love the idea of 160 00:10:26,679 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 2: reorganizing restructuring. In fact, the CFPB when it was created 161 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:36,120 Speaker 2: another agency was totally eliminated, so I'm up for that. 162 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:39,880 Speaker 2: But this is a fake reason. There is no duplication, 163 00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 2: and the law is clear that the CFPB has exclusive 164 00:10:43,840 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 2: authority to enforce these laws against big banks. No one 165 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:48,120 Speaker 2: else can. 166 00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 1: So is and is that the privy the CFPB is 167 00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 1: the primary regulatory focus is banks and credit unions. 168 00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:01,280 Speaker 2: And all those other non bank companies that offer mortgages, 169 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:07,080 Speaker 2: auto loans, student loans, credit reports, deck collectors. It's really 170 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:10,199 Speaker 2: all those people that you're playing those monthly bills. 171 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:16,079 Speaker 1: So in theory, the target targets credit card company. 172 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 2: That's yeah, so Target's credit card, all of those credit 173 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:22,760 Speaker 2: card companies were totally subject to the enforcement and the 174 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 2: rules of the CFPP. 175 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:28,560 Speaker 1: And the FTC never had oversight over how Target issued 176 00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 1: credit cards. 177 00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:32,839 Speaker 2: Well credit cards are issued through banks. Usually you enter 178 00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 2: in some sort of partnership of license exactly, that's exactly right. 179 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 1: So in that sense, it would be the bank that 180 00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 1: was running that's right. Yeah, Like you know right now 181 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: Apple is looking for a new bank to bat for, right, 182 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:48,440 Speaker 1: It's been Goldman Sachs, and they're looking for a different 183 00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:52,680 Speaker 1: bank to back them. H So you wouldn't have That's 184 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:56,480 Speaker 1: where the CFPB, not FTC. 185 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, in fact, we brought a may your 186 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 2: Enforcement action against Goldman Sachs for abuses in that Apple 187 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 2: card product and against the likes of Citibank others, including 188 00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:14,439 Speaker 2: for those store branded cards. 189 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:19,679 Speaker 1: What if you had to make the case to Republicans 190 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:22,439 Speaker 1: of why they should be in favor of the CFPB, 191 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:24,400 Speaker 1: what would be your case? 192 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 2: Well, we do, and behind closed doors often they would 193 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:34,360 Speaker 2: give us ideas for things we should pursue. This is 194 00:12:34,400 --> 00:12:37,760 Speaker 2: what's so ironic when you look at the consumer complaints, 195 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:42,120 Speaker 2: when you look at the individuals that benefit from this 196 00:12:42,360 --> 00:12:47,240 Speaker 2: type of watchdog agency, it is not some sort of 197 00:12:47,440 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 2: red or blue item. In fact, a disproportionate numbers of 198 00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:55,439 Speaker 2: people from red states have benefited from it. But Chuck, 199 00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:59,600 Speaker 2: this is in some way simpler than what you're asking. 200 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:04,400 Speaker 2: This is about big money and power and who calls 201 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 2: the shots in Congress and in Washington. And when you 202 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:13,040 Speaker 2: have big financial firms with lots of power in Washington, 203 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:17,320 Speaker 2: guess where they are going to try and target some 204 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:21,319 Speaker 2: of the defanging of law enforcement and the CFPB was 205 00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:24,080 Speaker 2: a prime target. 206 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:29,600 Speaker 1: What does crypto fall into this? And you know, is 207 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:33,079 Speaker 1: it something that you would argue belongs in CFPB, which 208 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 1: it argues, does it belong in the FTC when it 209 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:40,320 Speaker 1: comes to regulating these stable coins, regulating how they're sort 210 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: of issued, how they're used, et cetera. Or are we 211 00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:46,040 Speaker 1: still trying to figure that out? I mean, I know 212 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 1: they passed the Genius Act, which was supposed to give 213 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 1: some clarity to this. But if you were still the 214 00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:55,839 Speaker 1: head of the CFPB, would you be arguing that what 215 00:13:55,920 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 1: parts of crypto do you think should fall under the CFPB. 216 00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:01,480 Speaker 2: Yes, crypto's kind of if we think of it as 217 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:06,319 Speaker 2: a technology inasmuch that it's being used as a consumer 218 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:10,360 Speaker 2: payment so that you can use at retail stores whomever, 219 00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 2: that would be covered by the CFPB. As you know, 220 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:17,640 Speaker 2: most of crypto is more in the speculative trading world. 221 00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,480 Speaker 2: It's more you know, kind of what we would have 222 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 2: our market regulators, SEC and other agencies c. 223 00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:27,160 Speaker 1: Well, that's what the big big question is, is it 224 00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 1: is it something that belongs Is it a stock or 225 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 1: is it a commodity. 226 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, so that's really the stuff that's traded. I think 227 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 2: what we're starting to see is an effort to create, 228 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:42,240 Speaker 2: as you mentioned, what's known as stable coins, which is 229 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:47,720 Speaker 2: basically a kind of payment devices like a credit card. Right, yeah, 230 00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 2: it's more it's I mean, it's just a new way 231 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 2: to call a credit card. 232 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: I mean. And so it used to be a whole 233 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: bunch of companies would issue a credit card. Now they're 234 00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:55,880 Speaker 1: going to issue stable coins. 235 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 2: That's right. And so there are lots of laws and 236 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:02,800 Speaker 2: rules on the books that, for exampleemple when your credit 237 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:06,000 Speaker 2: card or debit card is misused, you have some rights 238 00:15:06,040 --> 00:15:09,880 Speaker 2: to dispute it when it's fraudulent. You know, those laws 239 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:12,760 Speaker 2: have to apply to for these stable coins. And that 240 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:15,400 Speaker 2: was that's the type of thing that the CFPB would 241 00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 2: enforce if that if those technologies really came to pass. 242 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:24,200 Speaker 2: And one of the things we really focused on was 243 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:29,760 Speaker 2: how these big tech companies were creating new payment instruments 244 00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 2: and currencies and to make sure that they were subject 245 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 2: to the same type of oversight when it came to fraud, hacks, errors, 246 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,200 Speaker 2: and other places where consumers can lose a lot of money. 247 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 1: Were you there when Facebook floated doing their own currency 248 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 1: and then they backed off after I think after they 249 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:49,000 Speaker 1: realized that the government would be all over them. 250 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:52,160 Speaker 2: Well, I was, I was an FTC commissioner at the time, 251 00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:57,240 Speaker 2: and you know when Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg others 252 00:15:57,240 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 2: when they concocted this. This was a big moment because 253 00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:06,080 Speaker 2: it showed that big tech companies, if they could get 254 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:10,520 Speaker 2: their hands on currency, it would give them the power 255 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:16,840 Speaker 2: to track transactions throughout the entire economy and be able 256 00:16:17,520 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 2: to in some ways coerce merchants as well as know 257 00:16:21,560 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 2: a full picture of how we spend, when we spend, 258 00:16:26,640 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 2: our behavior, so that they could target us even further. 259 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:33,600 Speaker 1: Well, that gets it to who should I mean? So, 260 00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:37,320 Speaker 1: for instance, our data right you know, we right now 261 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:42,520 Speaker 1: have so little for whatever reason, there's very few laws 262 00:16:42,520 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 1: are protecting our data right now. It gets bought and 263 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 1: sold all over the place. And I guess the question 264 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:51,680 Speaker 1: is if data is being used to market to me, 265 00:16:51,880 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 1: that would be the FTC. If data is being used 266 00:16:55,640 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: to look under the hood of my financial transactions, I 267 00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:03,840 Speaker 1: guess would fall under CFPB. I guess what is isere 268 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,600 Speaker 1: If we're ever going to have a Congress that tries 269 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:11,800 Speaker 1: to pass a data bill of rights, where should where 270 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:17,359 Speaker 1: should the public assume that the government? Which agency should 271 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:20,560 Speaker 1: the government be? Should we be expecting to protect our 272 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:22,840 Speaker 1: abuse of our personal data? 273 00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:27,119 Speaker 2: Yeah? I don't actually think the public cares which agency. 274 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:28,640 Speaker 2: They just want it done. 275 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:30,600 Speaker 1: Well, I agree they don't care. So that question I'm 276 00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:32,160 Speaker 1: asking you is which agencies? 277 00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:35,040 Speaker 2: I think the SEC is probably the right place. This 278 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 2: is a they already has children's privacy, that already has 279 00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:43,159 Speaker 2: all sorts of data protections. It's true the CFPB others 280 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:43,880 Speaker 2: do enforceable. 281 00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 1: So when it floats into what you just described that 282 00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:51,719 Speaker 1: you thought that that tech companies could suddenly understand our 283 00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:55,000 Speaker 1: spending habits in ways that just make marketing to us 284 00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:59,159 Speaker 1: even more aggressive and more potentially coercive. 285 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:05,640 Speaker 2: Is the FTC up to that, Well, we would need 286 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 2: to make sure of it. But of course, if it 287 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:12,080 Speaker 2: involves currency and payments, and maybe the FPB may have 288 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,440 Speaker 2: to do it. If it involves your health data, there 289 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 2: might be other agencies. We don't want to create too 290 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:23,199 Speaker 2: much of a monopoly on enforcement. You want there to 291 00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:26,720 Speaker 2: be aggressive corporate enforcement. And we also want to make 292 00:18:26,760 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 2: sure that if the FEDS are asleep at the switch 293 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:33,800 Speaker 2: like they were with opioids, like they were in the 294 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:38,800 Speaker 2: lead up to the mortgage crisis, that states and individuals 295 00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:41,320 Speaker 2: can also vindicate their rights. 296 00:18:43,280 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 1: So let's talk about the FED here a little bit. Right, 297 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:50,920 Speaker 1: the President is trying desperately to sort of get more 298 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:54,240 Speaker 1: spots to fill on the FED board. Looks like his. 299 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:59,359 Speaker 1: You know, they've spectacularly failed on Lisa Cook, assuming that 300 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 1: the docum mins that have since surface that show she there. 301 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: Whatever whatever charges they thought they were going to be 302 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:09,159 Speaker 1: able to bring against her, they're not going to be 303 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:11,919 Speaker 1: able to bring against her, which likely locks her in, 304 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:14,840 Speaker 1: will buy her some political immunity for some time. I 305 00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:20,040 Speaker 1: think here, but what does what is it that the 306 00:19:20,080 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 1: FED is regulating that he wants control of that you 307 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 1: think would be doe harm to the economy. 308 00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:35,000 Speaker 2: You know, the Founders when they drafted the Constitution, they 309 00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:40,200 Speaker 2: were very freaked out about the idea of the president 310 00:19:41,280 --> 00:19:42,840 Speaker 2: controlling the money supply. 311 00:19:43,600 --> 00:19:45,760 Speaker 1: They had no we didn't have a Federal Reserve Act 312 00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:47,080 Speaker 1: back then, though they didn't. 313 00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:50,800 Speaker 2: They were really worried though, what they saw in England, 314 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 2: where the Kings were just using the money supply to 315 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 2: their own personal advantages, and in fact, a glorious revolution 316 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:08,000 Speaker 2: in England was partially fomented by that, and they said 317 00:20:08,840 --> 00:20:12,439 Speaker 2: they wanted to make sure the Congress was in charge 318 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 2: of regulating money. You know, you fast forward through history 319 00:20:17,720 --> 00:20:20,439 Speaker 2: and you see that to get out of some of 320 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 2: the problems our country had, we formed this new central 321 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:27,000 Speaker 2: Bank to be able to make sure that there wouldn't 322 00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:32,919 Speaker 2: be financial panics, depressions, constant booms and busts, and to 323 00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:36,439 Speaker 2: make sure there was some steadiness to our money. And 324 00:20:36,520 --> 00:20:40,359 Speaker 2: I actually think that we should be worried about a 325 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:46,280 Speaker 2: president completely controlling the money supply, just like Kingswood, because 326 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 2: this has the power to pick winners and losers, to 327 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:57,800 Speaker 2: reward friends, to punish enemies, and to use the control 328 00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:02,640 Speaker 2: of money in ways that can give them even more power. Right, 329 00:21:02,800 --> 00:21:07,639 Speaker 2: So we see the FED usually is discussed as this 330 00:21:07,800 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 2: kind of priests and priestesses who you know, are PhDs 331 00:21:12,359 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 2: in economics, but this really is a big, big question 332 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:22,560 Speaker 2: about who has the power to regulate money. 333 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:31,000 Speaker 1: There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like 334 00:21:31,080 --> 00:21:34,160 Speaker 1: there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury 335 00:21:34,240 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 1: law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered 336 00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:40,280 Speaker 1: twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients. 337 00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:44,399 Speaker 1: It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing, 338 00:21:44,680 --> 00:21:47,480 Speaker 1: just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible. 339 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:50,639 Speaker 1: Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, 340 00:21:50,720 --> 00:21:53,840 Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, 341 00:21:54,320 --> 00:21:57,359 Speaker 1: which was a staggering forty times the amount that the 342 00:21:57,359 --> 00:22:00,639 Speaker 1: insurance company originally offered. That original offers six hundred and 343 00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:03,680 Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty 344 00:22:03,720 --> 00:22:05,919 Speaker 1: thousand dollars. So with more than a thousand lawyers across 345 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:08,399 Speaker 1: the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people. 346 00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:11,199 Speaker 1: If you're injured, you need a lawyer. You need somebody 347 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:13,760 Speaker 1: to get your back. Check out for the People dot com, 348 00:22:13,760 --> 00:22:18,360 Speaker 1: Slash podcast or now Pound Law, Pound five to two 349 00:22:18,640 --> 00:22:22,320 Speaker 1: nine law on your cell phone. And remember all law 350 00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:24,560 Speaker 1: firms are not the same, So check out Morgan and Morgan. 351 00:22:24,640 --> 00:22:33,160 Speaker 1: Their fee is free unless they win Well, I guess 352 00:22:32,920 --> 00:22:35,560 Speaker 1: it just one of those things where I didn't know 353 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:39,359 Speaker 1: we called it into question. Our economy has been fairly successful, 354 00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 1: only when we've had a couple of you know, asleep 355 00:22:43,520 --> 00:22:47,880 Speaker 1: at the switches moments, only when we politicize the fedback 356 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:50,800 Speaker 1: with Arthur Burns and Richard Nixon. But for the most part, 357 00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: we see we seem to have a pretty good blueprint 358 00:22:53,320 --> 00:22:55,720 Speaker 1: of how this should work, and yet here we are. 359 00:22:56,240 --> 00:22:59,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, and in fact, I think that there's a lot 360 00:22:59,040 --> 00:23:04,440 Speaker 2: of effort to say, how do we restore Federal Reserve independence? 361 00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 2: I think it's now been dead for several months now. 362 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:15,560 Speaker 2: In the lead up to President Trump getting inaugurated for 363 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:19,000 Speaker 2: the second time, you saw the Federal Reserve make a 364 00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:25,000 Speaker 2: lot of political moves to stave off President Trump. But 365 00:23:25,119 --> 00:23:28,840 Speaker 2: I think that just showed that they were willing to 366 00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:29,520 Speaker 2: bend the knee. 367 00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:35,240 Speaker 1: There's every single industry, the media industry, that what's left 368 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:38,880 Speaker 1: of it in so called traditional media did it. You've 369 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:43,080 Speaker 1: seen it in all sorts of political spaces. You've seen 370 00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:47,399 Speaker 1: it in the corporate world, you know, I've seen you know, 371 00:23:47,480 --> 00:23:49,960 Speaker 1: you've even seen it with the mayor of Washington, d C. 372 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:55,359 Speaker 1: Right like doing trying to a peace ap peace and 373 00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:57,840 Speaker 1: hope that he doesn't come with a sledgehammer. And yet, 374 00:23:57,880 --> 00:23:59,679 Speaker 1: of course he always comes with the sledgehammer no matter 375 00:23:59,720 --> 00:24:00,199 Speaker 1: what you do it. 376 00:24:00,880 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 2: And they see this Federal Reserve institution as in some 377 00:24:08,359 --> 00:24:13,840 Speaker 2: ways being able to wield immense power and chuck, look 378 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:17,600 Speaker 2: at what the FED did during the financial crisis and 379 00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 2: during COVID, injecting trillions of dollars through Wall Street and 380 00:24:24,840 --> 00:24:29,480 Speaker 2: the financial system. While Congress is sort of debating about 381 00:24:29,560 --> 00:24:30,640 Speaker 2: programs here. 382 00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:34,160 Speaker 1: I'd argue that FED saved our economy twice. 383 00:24:34,440 --> 00:24:37,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, And the question is is that now who will 384 00:24:37,920 --> 00:24:42,440 Speaker 2: be able to pull the strings there? And what will 385 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:46,560 Speaker 2: that power potentially be weaponized to do? I think that's 386 00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:47,720 Speaker 2: really the question. 387 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:49,600 Speaker 1: That Well, give me, give me some examples, right. We 388 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 1: have Turkey as the example. I had Douglas Houle Ticket, 389 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:56,879 Speaker 1: a long time sort of Republican leaning economists, was a 390 00:24:56,960 --> 00:25:00,159 Speaker 1: Republican appointee to run the CBO at one point, Na 391 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:04,320 Speaker 1: John McCain's been you know so, but he is always 392 00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:06,000 Speaker 1: held up. Turkey is like, do you want to know 393 00:25:06,040 --> 00:25:10,240 Speaker 1: what happens when when when a central bank gets politicized? 394 00:25:10,280 --> 00:25:12,679 Speaker 1: Let me show you Turkey walk me through that. 395 00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:17,959 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's the most traditional argument, which is 396 00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:23,600 Speaker 2: a president or authoritarian takes control over their central bank, 397 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:29,199 Speaker 2: tries to juice the economy by essentially printing lots of 398 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:33,160 Speaker 2: money and the result is lots and lots of inflation. 399 00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:37,040 Speaker 2: I think that's just like a narrow part of what 400 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:41,960 Speaker 2: could happen. But remember the Federal Reserve and other central banks, 401 00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:47,120 Speaker 2: they also have the power to buy assets. They can 402 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:51,240 Speaker 2: determine what to buy. And you hear all sorts of 403 00:25:51,359 --> 00:25:55,000 Speaker 2: ideas now being thrown at them. Should they be. 404 00:25:54,760 --> 00:26:00,879 Speaker 1: Bhind bits and the entire crypto? I mean that just 405 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:07,360 Speaker 1: the mainstreaming of some of this crypto that to this 406 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:11,880 Speaker 1: day is just an idea of tech people that want 407 00:26:11,920 --> 00:26:15,639 Speaker 1: to make something valuable and create value out of something 408 00:26:15,680 --> 00:26:16,320 Speaker 1: out of thin air. 409 00:26:16,600 --> 00:26:20,280 Speaker 2: And the truth is is that the FED essentially has 410 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 2: a credit card with no limit and no real interest rate. 411 00:26:26,400 --> 00:26:28,359 Speaker 2: And people observed this. 412 00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:30,879 Speaker 1: The king of debt as president in the United States 413 00:26:30,960 --> 00:26:32,120 Speaker 1: right now, he's going to love that. 414 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:36,480 Speaker 2: And people were nervous after the financial crisis when the 415 00:26:36,520 --> 00:26:39,440 Speaker 2: FED intervened in the economy. When it did in Congress 416 00:26:39,440 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 2: actually stripped some power from it. And then during COVID, 417 00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:49,600 Speaker 2: you know, injected a huge amount of money in the system, 418 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:54,080 Speaker 2: pushing up the stock market others. So I think this 419 00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:59,000 Speaker 2: is a power that some people are sniffing and they 420 00:26:59,080 --> 00:26:59,920 Speaker 2: want to use it. 421 00:27:00,359 --> 00:27:05,480 Speaker 1: So there's some of the some of my libertarian friends 422 00:27:06,040 --> 00:27:09,480 Speaker 1: who you know, and some of these things that the 423 00:27:09,600 --> 00:27:13,480 Speaker 1: logic I get, but in practice it doesn't always work 424 00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:17,560 Speaker 1: in a libertarian utopia. But there there's a strong bent 425 00:27:17,680 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 1: in the libertarian crowd of Essentially, you hear the you 426 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,600 Speaker 1: hear the phrase audit the fret, audit the FED, right, 427 00:27:24,680 --> 00:27:28,280 Speaker 1: and you'll have others even argue there shouldn't be a FED. 428 00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 1: What do you say to those folks? 429 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:36,399 Speaker 2: I mean, it can be it comes off as a 430 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:39,800 Speaker 2: little goofy sometimes, but I try and have good faith 431 00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:41,879 Speaker 2: on what they're worried about. 432 00:27:42,000 --> 00:27:44,000 Speaker 1: What do you believe they're worried about? Right? I take 433 00:27:44,040 --> 00:27:47,040 Speaker 1: the good faith path with me here with Rand Paul, right, 434 00:27:47,119 --> 00:27:48,959 Speaker 1: you know, And that's essentially you were talking about here 435 00:27:49,040 --> 00:27:51,680 Speaker 1: is who's probably the Ran and Ron have been the 436 00:27:51,680 --> 00:27:56,000 Speaker 1: most coherent critics of the FED. And you know, doesn't 437 00:27:56,000 --> 00:28:01,000 Speaker 1: mean that what they're advocating is made stare, but they're 438 00:28:01,040 --> 00:28:02,760 Speaker 1: probably two of the louder critics. 439 00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:09,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you see a growing spectrum of critics 440 00:28:09,160 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 2: of the FED that have essentially said they are positioning 441 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:19,000 Speaker 2: themselves as the wizards of the economy and they have 442 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:26,719 Speaker 2: control over this enormous, essentially spending an investment power that 443 00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:29,119 Speaker 2: has very little checks on them. 444 00:28:29,320 --> 00:28:31,320 Speaker 1: And is that a fair criticism? You think that is? 445 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:34,200 Speaker 2: Oh well, I think there's something to be said that 446 00:28:34,520 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 2: a lot of decisions that they do make would probably 447 00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:41,680 Speaker 2: be better for the Congress to be making. 448 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:45,720 Speaker 1: You know, welcome to Congress gave up so much authority 449 00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:48,600 Speaker 1: hour of the last decades. I mean, I'm just I'm 450 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:53,520 Speaker 1: so sick and tired of Congress, not members of Congress, 451 00:28:53,560 --> 00:28:56,720 Speaker 1: not reading the founding papers and not understanding what their 452 00:28:56,760 --> 00:28:57,720 Speaker 1: role was intended to be. 453 00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:03,800 Speaker 2: And they have totally just transferred power to someone else 454 00:29:04,560 --> 00:29:07,280 Speaker 2: rather than actually playing their role. 455 00:29:07,360 --> 00:29:09,360 Speaker 1: So this is it, because that's hard, it's hard to 456 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:12,240 Speaker 1: do this work in Congress, they and it's easier to 457 00:29:12,840 --> 00:29:14,960 Speaker 1: let a president do it and blame them when they 458 00:29:15,040 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 1: mess up. 459 00:29:15,920 --> 00:29:17,960 Speaker 2: I think that's right, and I think we got to 460 00:29:18,320 --> 00:29:23,560 Speaker 2: figure out what is it that we want this institution 461 00:29:23,840 --> 00:29:27,560 Speaker 2: to be doing. I think the FED should be making 462 00:29:27,600 --> 00:29:31,560 Speaker 2: sure that we're running the economy with the real economy 463 00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 2: in mind, not just the financial sector. We want family farms, 464 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:40,320 Speaker 2: small businesses, others to be able to get loans to 465 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:44,400 Speaker 2: hire people and produce. And I think that there is 466 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:49,560 Speaker 2: real questions about whether we have that system today. We're 467 00:29:49,600 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 2: a handful of very large Wall Street institutions call the 468 00:29:54,880 --> 00:29:59,200 Speaker 2: shots on how credit and payments move in the economy. 469 00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:03,600 Speaker 1: So I want to take you back. I remember when 470 00:30:06,960 --> 00:30:11,000 Speaker 1: during the height of the financial crisis, when Dodd Frank 471 00:30:11,120 --> 00:30:15,320 Speaker 1: was being written, and there were and you basically had 472 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:18,680 Speaker 1: two senators who were trying to work together, Bob Corker 473 00:30:18,680 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 1: and Mark Warner, who were seen as two of the 474 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:28,360 Speaker 1: more conversant senators on the issue, meaning they actually sort 475 00:30:28,360 --> 00:30:31,960 Speaker 1: of understood it, didn't their eyes didn't glaze over, you know, 476 00:30:32,040 --> 00:30:35,360 Speaker 1: at the second briefing of how Dodd Frank should work, 477 00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:42,760 Speaker 1: et cetera. But I also had many I remember talking 478 00:30:42,760 --> 00:30:46,040 Speaker 1: to a few Treasury officials who said, well, only Corker 479 00:30:46,040 --> 00:30:48,920 Speaker 1: and Warner really understand this, and that's what makes it 480 00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:54,440 Speaker 1: difficult for Congress to write this law. And I look 481 00:30:54,480 --> 00:30:57,680 Speaker 1: at it as if something is so complicated that the 482 00:30:57,840 --> 00:31:02,040 Speaker 1: representatives that are elected to Congress don't understand it, then 483 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:05,959 Speaker 1: maybe maybe the law itself is flawed. What say you? 484 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:15,320 Speaker 2: I think that sometimes we create excuses for politicians on 485 00:31:15,440 --> 00:31:19,320 Speaker 2: how they can worm their way out of making decisions 486 00:31:19,360 --> 00:31:23,080 Speaker 2: about big problems. And the truth is is that money 487 00:31:23,240 --> 00:31:28,200 Speaker 2: and banking from the time of the British Crown as 488 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:32,920 Speaker 2: our componial ruler, these were hard and Chuck, there's lots 489 00:31:32,920 --> 00:31:38,280 Speaker 2: of hard things about defence and weapons and patents and medicines. 490 00:31:39,240 --> 00:31:44,200 Speaker 2: This is their job. And I think that when we say, well, 491 00:31:45,320 --> 00:31:49,520 Speaker 2: let's just substitute it for kicking the can down the 492 00:31:49,600 --> 00:31:53,160 Speaker 2: road and letting someone else decide or see what happens, 493 00:31:53,960 --> 00:31:58,760 Speaker 2: that's really I think malpractice, and we should be willing 494 00:31:59,320 --> 00:32:04,800 Speaker 2: to actually hold our leaders more accountable to get more done, 495 00:32:05,560 --> 00:32:06,920 Speaker 2: even if it's tricky. 496 00:32:09,160 --> 00:32:12,440 Speaker 1: So let me ask this, did you ever try to 497 00:32:12,480 --> 00:32:15,680 Speaker 1: regulate or look under the hood of an algorithm that 498 00:32:15,840 --> 00:32:18,719 Speaker 1: was used to decide, you know, how much credit somebody 499 00:32:18,840 --> 00:32:24,880 Speaker 1: was was qualified for? And if you did, what was what? 500 00:32:25,640 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 1: How did the tech companies respond? 501 00:32:29,120 --> 00:32:32,840 Speaker 2: So the answer is yes. And there's a law in 502 00:32:32,920 --> 00:32:39,840 Speaker 2: the books that says if a lender is using some 503 00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:45,720 Speaker 2: type of third party score or data, they've got to 504 00:32:45,840 --> 00:32:49,720 Speaker 2: tell you if they deny you that loan, a clear 505 00:32:49,840 --> 00:32:54,160 Speaker 2: statement of reasons as to why. And we would come 506 00:32:54,560 --> 00:33:00,239 Speaker 2: up against some financial firms who they themselves didn't know 507 00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:04,880 Speaker 2: how to interpret the algorithm themselves, and the answer was, 508 00:33:05,160 --> 00:33:08,280 Speaker 2: then you can't use it. And this is what is 509 00:33:08,280 --> 00:33:13,160 Speaker 2: happening throughout the entire economy. And as AI, which to 510 00:33:13,240 --> 00:33:15,680 Speaker 2: me always has been a little bit of a marketing term. 511 00:33:15,720 --> 00:33:18,840 Speaker 2: You should think of AI or an algorithm. There's really 512 00:33:18,920 --> 00:33:23,960 Speaker 2: just a complex set of mathematics that is generating some 513 00:33:24,160 --> 00:33:29,040 Speaker 2: sort of decision or content. And we've had that in le. 514 00:33:29,320 --> 00:33:32,600 Speaker 1: Probably I always say it's a probability model. Yeah, this 515 00:33:32,680 --> 00:33:36,120 Speaker 1: is an intelligence. It's just a probability model, and we've 516 00:33:36,160 --> 00:33:38,960 Speaker 1: had it for a long time. We in financial services. 517 00:33:39,040 --> 00:33:43,200 Speaker 1: It's called a Fiico score. There's all sorts. 518 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:47,719 Speaker 2: Of these algorithms, and to me, they have to have 519 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:51,640 Speaker 2: some degree of accountability. When you are using those algorithms 520 00:33:51,680 --> 00:33:56,600 Speaker 2: and you cannot explain why someone is being denied alone, 521 00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:58,800 Speaker 2: then you have to be accountable for that. 522 00:33:59,400 --> 00:34:04,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, how would you deal with AI pricing? You know, 523 00:34:04,680 --> 00:34:09,600 Speaker 1: when I am, I wish Delta airlines flew to more 524 00:34:09,640 --> 00:34:12,200 Speaker 1: places because of the major airlines I sort of feel 525 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:15,839 Speaker 1: like that they're the most consumer friendly, and yet I'm 526 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:19,000 Speaker 1: upset at them because they're the ones that have although 527 00:34:19,040 --> 00:34:20,920 Speaker 1: I guess to their credit, they're at least admitting that 528 00:34:20,960 --> 00:34:23,640 Speaker 1: they want to do this. They want to lean in 529 00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:26,920 Speaker 1: on AI pricing. What do I mean by that? Well, 530 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:30,359 Speaker 1: they want to maximize how much I pay versus how 531 00:34:30,400 --> 00:34:34,320 Speaker 1: much my daughter pays, right, and she's a grown adult 532 00:34:34,400 --> 00:34:37,040 Speaker 1: with her own income level. I'm a grown adult with 533 00:34:37,120 --> 00:34:41,680 Speaker 1: my own income level, and so it's pretty clear Delta 534 00:34:41,719 --> 00:34:44,600 Speaker 1: wants to treat us as different consumers. They're going to 535 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:46,759 Speaker 1: assume that I can pay more, and they're going to 536 00:34:46,840 --> 00:34:48,440 Speaker 1: charge me more. They're going to assume she can pay 537 00:34:48,520 --> 00:34:55,839 Speaker 1: less and they're going to charge her less. How's that 538 00:34:55,880 --> 00:34:59,279 Speaker 1: not discrimination? And how are we going to deal with 539 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:06,880 Speaker 1: this quote unquote probability model dictating personal pricing that you know, 540 00:35:06,920 --> 00:35:08,839 Speaker 1: what I see as a price and what you see 541 00:35:08,840 --> 00:35:11,120 Speaker 1: as a price will not be the same thing. How 542 00:35:11,200 --> 00:35:12,279 Speaker 1: is that legal? Yeah? 543 00:35:12,320 --> 00:35:16,440 Speaker 2: I actually think we need to have a moratorium or 544 00:35:16,520 --> 00:35:22,280 Speaker 2: ban of this. I was diagnosed with a serious medical 545 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:27,319 Speaker 2: issue several years ago, and, like many other people who 546 00:35:27,360 --> 00:35:33,120 Speaker 2: deal with cancer other serious issues, sometimes notice in targeted 547 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:40,920 Speaker 2: ads really stuff they wouldn't have gotten before, you know, 548 00:35:40,640 --> 00:35:44,480 Speaker 2: no health exam, life insurance, all of this stuff. And 549 00:35:45,000 --> 00:35:51,719 Speaker 2: you really got to wonder if somebody knows if you 550 00:35:52,040 --> 00:35:56,080 Speaker 2: just lost a parent, or if you are struggling with 551 00:35:56,800 --> 00:35:58,759 Speaker 2: mental health issues. 552 00:35:58,360 --> 00:36:01,640 Speaker 1: Or if you're airline so you have a death in 553 00:36:01,680 --> 00:36:03,640 Speaker 1: your family, you're gonna have to buy this ticket. 554 00:36:04,840 --> 00:36:08,320 Speaker 2: They should not be able to use that information at all. 555 00:36:08,719 --> 00:36:11,920 Speaker 2: And I don't care how they try and justify it. 556 00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:15,040 Speaker 1: What is the legal justification that they're using. What's what's 557 00:36:15,239 --> 00:36:15,920 Speaker 1: have you heard of good? 558 00:36:16,280 --> 00:36:20,440 Speaker 2: Their legal justification is that it's not illegal. And it 559 00:36:20,560 --> 00:36:23,400 Speaker 2: is true that there are some things that are considered 560 00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:27,040 Speaker 2: off limits. We have anti discrimination laws that cover race 561 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:29,640 Speaker 2: and other protected classes. 562 00:36:30,520 --> 00:36:34,040 Speaker 1: But is socioeconomic status something that's a protected class? 563 00:36:34,080 --> 00:36:36,719 Speaker 2: Though, no, it's not. And in fact, one of the 564 00:36:36,760 --> 00:36:39,799 Speaker 2: best consumer protections I think that is out there is 565 00:36:39,840 --> 00:36:43,759 Speaker 2: the price tag, because you know how much it is 566 00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:47,560 Speaker 2: before they know anything about you. And I think we 567 00:36:47,600 --> 00:36:52,440 Speaker 2: should be seriously worried about the shift in even brick 568 00:36:52,480 --> 00:36:57,000 Speaker 2: and mortar retail that are moving toward digital price tags 569 00:36:57,120 --> 00:37:00,160 Speaker 2: or where you have to scan a code to figure 570 00:37:00,160 --> 00:37:01,279 Speaker 2: out the price for you. 571 00:37:02,000 --> 00:37:04,880 Speaker 1: I think I think it's pretty obvious this is happening 572 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:09,239 Speaker 1: with Uber and Lyft, but I don't know. 573 00:37:09,200 --> 00:37:09,840 Speaker 2: How to curve it. 574 00:37:09,880 --> 00:37:13,200 Speaker 1: Fact right, I have to say, you know where they're 575 00:37:13,239 --> 00:37:15,480 Speaker 1: just you know, if I use the black car service, 576 00:37:15,520 --> 00:37:18,279 Speaker 1: somebody else doesn't. You know, the black car price might 577 00:37:18,280 --> 00:37:20,280 Speaker 1: be lower for somebody that doesn't use it as often 578 00:37:20,320 --> 00:37:23,640 Speaker 1: as maybe I do because I'm willing to use it. 579 00:37:24,160 --> 00:37:29,400 Speaker 1: You know. It just it It feels powerless as a consumer, 580 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:32,560 Speaker 1: and it's just like, great, this is only going to 581 00:37:32,560 --> 00:37:35,880 Speaker 1: get this is going to get abuse, and I just 582 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:38,359 Speaker 1: worry that Congress doesn't even understand how to stop it. 583 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:42,400 Speaker 2: Well, that's why if they don't, the states should pass laws. 584 00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:45,080 Speaker 2: To Bannon, I think this is something we have to 585 00:37:45,200 --> 00:37:48,280 Speaker 2: keep pushing on because that is turning into a world 586 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:53,239 Speaker 2: where AI is not going to really help people. It 587 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:56,800 Speaker 2: is just going to help companies exploit people. 588 00:37:57,160 --> 00:37:59,840 Speaker 1: Well, and what it'll do is those that are truly 589 00:38:00,200 --> 00:38:04,640 Speaker 1: they will create false personas that make them seem poor. 590 00:38:04,800 --> 00:38:08,080 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, people will hack that system and 591 00:38:08,120 --> 00:38:10,040 Speaker 1: it will actually be self defeating. 592 00:38:10,440 --> 00:38:13,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, well maybe. I mean sometimes it's hard to even 593 00:38:13,000 --> 00:38:15,120 Speaker 2: figure out how to avoid some of this. You know, 594 00:38:15,160 --> 00:38:17,840 Speaker 2: they say, oh, you get different prices. If you're checking 595 00:38:17,880 --> 00:38:20,640 Speaker 2: on something, checking a price with an iPhone versus an 596 00:38:20,640 --> 00:38:24,200 Speaker 2: android versus a desktop. I mean, I don't want to 597 00:38:24,280 --> 00:38:27,400 Speaker 2: waste all my time to thinking about all this. I 598 00:38:27,440 --> 00:38:29,520 Speaker 2: want it to just be fair. Just like I don't 599 00:38:29,520 --> 00:38:33,000 Speaker 2: want to walk onto an airplane and have to inspect 600 00:38:33,040 --> 00:38:35,759 Speaker 2: some sort of records to determine if it's safe. It 601 00:38:35,800 --> 00:38:39,440 Speaker 2: should just not crash when I walk on that plane. 602 00:38:39,920 --> 00:38:43,719 Speaker 2: And this is why I think we have big problems 603 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:47,000 Speaker 2: on our hands when you have an administration that is 604 00:38:47,320 --> 00:38:54,240 Speaker 2: essentially defunding and destroying law enforcement that is essentially keeping 605 00:38:54,719 --> 00:38:58,600 Speaker 2: the things we want to do fundamentally safe, so that 606 00:38:58,880 --> 00:39:01,960 Speaker 2: now we have to even be worried about it. 607 00:39:02,239 --> 00:39:05,759 Speaker 1: I mean, that's it's interesting. You called it law enforcement, right, 608 00:39:05,800 --> 00:39:10,960 Speaker 1: which is basically you know, the financial police, right, And 609 00:39:11,080 --> 00:39:15,239 Speaker 1: if people saw the regulators as sort of cops, they 610 00:39:15,320 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 1: might you know, there are those that don't want the 611 00:39:18,640 --> 00:39:22,120 Speaker 1: regulators call them bureaucratic bureaucrats, and those that do call 612 00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:26,759 Speaker 1: them cops, right Like. That seems to be the messaging 613 00:39:26,800 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 1: fight that takes place when it comes to regular regulators 614 00:39:30,680 --> 00:39:34,520 Speaker 1: in general, but specifically regulators for the for the financial world. 615 00:39:34,920 --> 00:39:37,879 Speaker 2: Well, I think here's also the issue, which is that 616 00:39:38,840 --> 00:39:43,840 Speaker 2: there are people who have had experiences dealing with nonsense 617 00:39:44,440 --> 00:39:49,640 Speaker 2: red tape. And then there's I think the big financial firms, 618 00:39:49,760 --> 00:39:54,520 Speaker 2: big tech firms, others where people perceive that they seem 619 00:39:54,560 --> 00:39:58,000 Speaker 2: to be breaking the law over and over and over again, 620 00:39:58,200 --> 00:40:00,000 Speaker 2: and then there's just no consequences. 621 00:40:00,080 --> 00:40:01,400 Speaker 1: There never is any consequences. 622 00:40:01,640 --> 00:40:02,840 Speaker 2: This is something to say. 623 00:40:02,680 --> 00:40:05,440 Speaker 1: Oops, we're sorry. They'll put it an apology. 624 00:40:05,520 --> 00:40:09,040 Speaker 2: Sometimes oh and and Chuck, you will have the law 625 00:40:09,120 --> 00:40:13,359 Speaker 2: enforcement agency or the Justice department or the regulator beat 626 00:40:13,440 --> 00:40:16,600 Speaker 2: their chest about how tough they are because of the 627 00:40:16,760 --> 00:40:20,400 Speaker 2: fine they've gotten. And then you look in the stock market. 628 00:40:20,840 --> 00:40:24,239 Speaker 2: The fine is it perceived by investors as just a 629 00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:28,080 Speaker 2: tiny cost of doing business. And one of the things 630 00:40:28,120 --> 00:40:32,400 Speaker 2: that the industries have criticized me for is that I 631 00:40:32,480 --> 00:40:35,359 Speaker 2: really believe that when you have a repeat offenders like that, 632 00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:41,640 Speaker 2: fines are not a deterrent. They're sometimes an incentive. If 633 00:40:41,680 --> 00:40:44,960 Speaker 2: you're making money and just paying a fine out of 634 00:40:44,960 --> 00:40:51,280 Speaker 2: your profits, you have to face real accountability, like individuals 635 00:40:51,280 --> 00:40:54,719 Speaker 2: in the C suite. Were they calling the shots and 636 00:40:54,760 --> 00:40:58,400 Speaker 2: should they be accountable or should we put real limits 637 00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:02,560 Speaker 2: on these companies in terms of growth restrictions, or frankly, 638 00:41:03,000 --> 00:41:10,399 Speaker 2: if they're criminally convicted of massive fraud, then perhaps they 639 00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:12,440 Speaker 2: should no longer be in business. 640 00:41:13,160 --> 00:41:17,720 Speaker 1: They should somehow lose their license, or their executives should 641 00:41:17,719 --> 00:41:19,920 Speaker 1: be criminally charged or something like that. 642 00:41:19,920 --> 00:41:22,560 Speaker 2: That's right, and that's the real deterrence that I think 643 00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:27,239 Speaker 2: people know. If it's a small business, they will be 644 00:41:27,360 --> 00:41:30,920 Speaker 2: shut down, and if it's a big player, they just 645 00:41:31,200 --> 00:41:34,719 Speaker 2: skate part. And I think that lack of that two 646 00:41:34,840 --> 00:41:39,080 Speaker 2: tier justice is a very big frustration for a lot 647 00:41:39,120 --> 00:41:42,760 Speaker 2: of people and everything right, and it makes them feel 648 00:41:42,760 --> 00:41:47,800 Speaker 2: that their government is just on the side of people 649 00:41:48,520 --> 00:41:52,480 Speaker 2: who are exploiting them. It bothers me so much because 650 00:41:52,719 --> 00:41:55,000 Speaker 2: we saw it with opioids, we saw it with the 651 00:41:55,000 --> 00:41:58,480 Speaker 2: mortgage crisis. There's been so many cases, and now with 652 00:41:58,600 --> 00:42:04,839 Speaker 2: big tech companies teenly violating privacy other laws, it just 653 00:42:04,920 --> 00:42:15,920 Speaker 2: seems that there is no consequences. 654 00:42:17,960 --> 00:42:20,120 Speaker 1: Look, they're singularly I don't know what happened to the 655 00:42:20,120 --> 00:42:23,360 Speaker 1: travelayers in this country, but they're singularly responsible for the 656 00:42:23,440 --> 00:42:26,560 Speaker 1: current political environment that has caused all sorts of physical 657 00:42:26,600 --> 00:42:30,200 Speaker 1: harm to people. I do think that Section two thirty 658 00:42:30,239 --> 00:42:33,719 Speaker 1: doesn't protect these tech companies the minute they create an algorithm, 659 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:37,120 Speaker 1: because the minute you create an algorithm, you have you've 660 00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:37,960 Speaker 1: become a publisher. 661 00:42:38,480 --> 00:42:41,400 Speaker 2: That's right, you are no longer some neutral pipe correct 662 00:42:41,480 --> 00:42:44,439 Speaker 2: that information is flowing from it is. 663 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:50,200 Speaker 1: I think section two thirty is doesn't matter anymore. Once 664 00:42:50,320 --> 00:42:53,239 Speaker 1: you've decided to start an algorithm and create one to 665 00:42:53,239 --> 00:42:53,640 Speaker 1: do this. 666 00:42:53,640 --> 00:42:58,920 Speaker 2: And once you are using behavioral targeting, you are not 667 00:42:59,120 --> 00:43:03,600 Speaker 2: some sort of path of billboard or telephone wire. You 668 00:43:03,640 --> 00:43:07,440 Speaker 2: are actually in the business and you should be accountable 669 00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:09,840 Speaker 2: for your content. And you know what, Chuck, we have 670 00:43:09,920 --> 00:43:13,600 Speaker 2: had a situation in our country where this complete lack 671 00:43:13,680 --> 00:43:18,719 Speaker 2: of accountability has led to many social media networks and 672 00:43:18,840 --> 00:43:25,560 Speaker 2: tech platforms being havens for crime, recruiting terrorists, and so 673 00:43:25,960 --> 00:43:30,120 Speaker 2: much harm to kids and teens. And it just feels 674 00:43:30,200 --> 00:43:34,400 Speaker 2: like if the current system persists, it will only get worse. 675 00:43:34,719 --> 00:43:40,719 Speaker 1: No, there's no and this is it is. It is 676 00:43:40,840 --> 00:43:44,399 Speaker 1: really frustrating that the tech companies are taking no responsibility 677 00:43:44,480 --> 00:43:47,600 Speaker 1: or whatsoever and they've not been held accountable. We all 678 00:43:47,760 --> 00:43:51,960 Speaker 1: know it in different ways that they're that they're sort 679 00:43:51,960 --> 00:43:58,120 Speaker 1: of you know that they're predator. They're essentially marketing predators 680 00:43:57,800 --> 00:44:02,160 Speaker 1: of using our data. Again, their predators, whether it's on 681 00:44:02,239 --> 00:44:04,960 Speaker 1: our what we watch or hear or see, or how 682 00:44:04,960 --> 00:44:05,840 Speaker 1: we spend our money. 683 00:44:06,920 --> 00:44:10,640 Speaker 2: I think that if we don't solve this, we are 684 00:44:10,680 --> 00:44:13,040 Speaker 2: going to continue to move to a darker, darker place. 685 00:44:13,080 --> 00:44:14,880 Speaker 2: I always tell people completely. 686 00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:16,480 Speaker 1: I do agree with that. I mean, when the government, 687 00:44:16,560 --> 00:44:19,439 Speaker 1: when people stop believing the government is there to look 688 00:44:19,440 --> 00:44:26,799 Speaker 1: out for them, it's the beginning of of people deciding no, 689 00:44:27,040 --> 00:44:29,280 Speaker 1: if they're not following the law, watch should I yeah? 690 00:44:29,520 --> 00:44:32,800 Speaker 2: And we that is where we're moving to. I feel 691 00:44:32,840 --> 00:44:36,600 Speaker 2: that I fear that when you have a small click 692 00:44:36,760 --> 00:44:42,319 Speaker 2: of companies that can control the flow of money and 693 00:44:42,400 --> 00:44:45,120 Speaker 2: control the flow of information, those are the two things 694 00:44:45,120 --> 00:44:49,640 Speaker 2: that a society basically rests on. And you have now 695 00:44:49,640 --> 00:44:52,680 Speaker 2: a situation where it is a small group of people 696 00:44:53,280 --> 00:44:56,680 Speaker 2: who have the power to pick winners and losers commercially 697 00:44:56,800 --> 00:44:57,600 Speaker 2: and politically. 698 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:02,960 Speaker 1: Did you get here? Not how did you get here today? 699 00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:07,359 Speaker 1: But how did you become a regulator? How did you 700 00:45:07,360 --> 00:45:10,440 Speaker 1: you know? Is that is when you went to college? 701 00:45:10,719 --> 00:45:16,120 Speaker 1: I mean, you're very impressive degrees both the Harvard and Wharton. 702 00:45:16,239 --> 00:45:18,320 Speaker 1: But how'd you end up on this path? 703 00:45:19,040 --> 00:45:19,239 Speaker 2: You know? 704 00:45:19,440 --> 00:45:21,320 Speaker 1: I I'm your origin story. 705 00:45:21,520 --> 00:45:25,319 Speaker 2: I went to business school, which really that school was 706 00:45:25,360 --> 00:45:33,400 Speaker 2: a way it has produced financers, felons, everything in between. 707 00:45:34,320 --> 00:45:39,239 Speaker 2: And finance was actually to me a place that was 708 00:45:39,320 --> 00:45:45,279 Speaker 2: supposed to be about creating companies, creating opportunities. And when 709 00:45:45,400 --> 00:45:53,160 Speaker 2: I witnessed the financial crisis and the extraordinary failure of 710 00:45:53,920 --> 00:45:59,800 Speaker 2: federal law enforcement and regulators, I really became so disillusioned 711 00:46:00,760 --> 00:46:04,319 Speaker 2: with how the system was working. And I think the 712 00:46:04,360 --> 00:46:07,920 Speaker 2: only answer to it was really to choose a different 713 00:46:08,040 --> 00:46:15,240 Speaker 2: path and in some ways taking on these concentrated corporate 714 00:46:15,280 --> 00:46:20,080 Speaker 2: interests who want to see the regulators as lap dogs 715 00:46:20,920 --> 00:46:25,839 Speaker 2: rather than watchdogs. That's what we have to stop. And 716 00:46:25,920 --> 00:46:29,200 Speaker 2: I think that lots of people around this country. I 717 00:46:30,200 --> 00:46:34,600 Speaker 2: really spent a lot of my professional life a decade 718 00:46:34,640 --> 00:46:37,960 Speaker 2: ago on confronting these big student loan companies. 719 00:46:38,640 --> 00:46:40,080 Speaker 1: Where were you doing that? 720 00:46:40,120 --> 00:46:42,360 Speaker 2: How are you doing When I was at the CFPB 721 00:46:42,520 --> 00:46:46,520 Speaker 2: before I was director, and after the mortgage crisis, discovered 722 00:46:46,560 --> 00:46:51,759 Speaker 2: that there was a aftershock all of those families who 723 00:46:51,840 --> 00:46:55,279 Speaker 2: were unable to afford college for their kids because they 724 00:46:55,320 --> 00:47:00,400 Speaker 2: lost everything, All of those states and cities that lost 725 00:47:00,480 --> 00:47:05,920 Speaker 2: all their tax based tuition searched, student debts searched, and 726 00:47:06,080 --> 00:47:10,600 Speaker 2: you had a whole crop millions and millions of people 727 00:47:11,280 --> 00:47:15,720 Speaker 2: who were owing a trillion dollars. For a few years, 728 00:47:15,760 --> 00:47:19,600 Speaker 2: there was I think over a million people each year 729 00:47:19,719 --> 00:47:23,560 Speaker 2: defaulting on their student loans, and this was basically a 730 00:47:23,840 --> 00:47:32,360 Speaker 2: total and complete, just travesty for the society. Young people 731 00:47:33,560 --> 00:47:38,440 Speaker 2: owing that much money, graduating into a horrible economy in 732 00:47:38,520 --> 00:47:43,640 Speaker 2: two thousand and nine twenty ten, and would never The 733 00:47:43,719 --> 00:47:47,200 Speaker 2: data shows that some of them never catch up. And 734 00:47:47,239 --> 00:47:51,120 Speaker 2: now you see a response to that financial crisis that 735 00:47:51,200 --> 00:47:55,360 Speaker 2: has pushed up asset values and no one even thinks 736 00:47:55,400 --> 00:47:58,640 Speaker 2: they can really buy a home when they have that 737 00:47:58,800 --> 00:48:01,880 Speaker 2: much debt. So I think that this is part of 738 00:48:02,080 --> 00:48:05,359 Speaker 2: a generational piece too, which is that it feels that 739 00:48:05,520 --> 00:48:11,000 Speaker 2: prior generations were able to have the benefit of a 740 00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:18,320 Speaker 2: country that actually gave them affordable college, lots of pathways 741 00:48:18,880 --> 00:48:22,680 Speaker 2: to be able to have a stable financial life to 742 00:48:22,880 --> 00:48:26,200 Speaker 2: raise a family. And now we just don't live in 743 00:48:26,239 --> 00:48:29,520 Speaker 2: that country. We live in a place where it is 744 00:48:29,960 --> 00:48:35,319 Speaker 2: basically a treadmill that you run faster and faster on 745 00:48:36,120 --> 00:48:40,399 Speaker 2: just to afford the basics. And that is not what 746 00:48:40,440 --> 00:48:40,960 Speaker 2: we want. 747 00:48:41,640 --> 00:48:46,399 Speaker 1: Rab Emmanuel was famously said, and a sort of one 748 00:48:46,440 --> 00:48:51,120 Speaker 1: of these after post Obama presidencies, conversations that I remember 749 00:48:51,200 --> 00:48:54,440 Speaker 1: him saying, he goes because he was an advocate against 750 00:48:54,440 --> 00:48:57,439 Speaker 1: pursuing Obamacare at the time, or the Affordable Care Act, 751 00:48:57,800 --> 00:49:02,960 Speaker 1: and his argument was the public so, you know, hurting 752 00:49:03,120 --> 00:49:07,080 Speaker 1: from the financial crisis, that really the better politics would 753 00:49:07,080 --> 00:49:12,239 Speaker 1: have been some old Testament justice, right, and the you know, 754 00:49:12,239 --> 00:49:14,560 Speaker 1: when people think back to the financial crisis, it is 755 00:49:14,600 --> 00:49:20,719 Speaker 1: always nobody got frog marched, nobody got held criminally accountable 756 00:49:21,680 --> 00:49:27,919 Speaker 1: or destroying, frankly pieces of the global economy. So let's 757 00:49:27,960 --> 00:49:32,719 Speaker 1: say there had been old Testament justice who deserved to 758 00:49:32,840 --> 00:49:35,359 Speaker 1: be brought up on criminal charges. You know, I think 759 00:49:35,400 --> 00:49:38,799 Speaker 1: about this because you know, with during the first couple 760 00:49:38,840 --> 00:49:41,600 Speaker 1: of years of this century, we had the en Run. 761 00:49:43,160 --> 00:49:45,480 Speaker 1: Enron was sort of the poster child for a handful 762 00:49:45,520 --> 00:49:48,799 Speaker 1: of companies that were ripping people off, and we put 763 00:49:48,800 --> 00:49:50,920 Speaker 1: the n Roun guys in jail, and I think in 764 00:49:50,960 --> 00:49:54,680 Speaker 1: some ways it was symbolic, but it made I think 765 00:49:54,680 --> 00:49:57,440 Speaker 1: it sort of served its purpose. Right, somebody paid a 766 00:49:57,480 --> 00:50:01,680 Speaker 1: price with the financial so nobody paid a price. Well, 767 00:50:02,080 --> 00:50:04,759 Speaker 1: actually a lot of people paid a price, but not 768 00:50:04,840 --> 00:50:07,799 Speaker 1: the people that were the perpetrators. If you could go 769 00:50:07,920 --> 00:50:11,000 Speaker 1: back in time, who would you have brought up on charges. 770 00:50:13,760 --> 00:50:17,680 Speaker 2: I think there's a long list of investigations that were 771 00:50:17,800 --> 00:50:24,919 Speaker 2: never even completed. I'm sorry, I'm misspeaking, never even started. Yeah, 772 00:50:24,920 --> 00:50:28,080 Speaker 2: I can't remember what, you know, like the credit default swaps? 773 00:50:28,200 --> 00:50:29,800 Speaker 2: Like where how did this start? 774 00:50:29,960 --> 00:50:33,879 Speaker 1: Right? Should there have been an investigation to figure it out? 775 00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:36,480 Speaker 1: Like where did this financial instrument start? And where did 776 00:50:36,520 --> 00:50:38,440 Speaker 1: it come from? And who thought it was a good 777 00:50:38,440 --> 00:50:41,160 Speaker 1: idea and who who noticed the flaw the first time 778 00:50:41,200 --> 00:50:43,239 Speaker 1: they realized, uh, oh, these are going to turn into 779 00:50:43,239 --> 00:50:44,080 Speaker 1: really bad loans. 780 00:50:44,400 --> 00:50:48,600 Speaker 2: Yeah. And you know what often is the excuse is 781 00:50:48,640 --> 00:50:53,680 Speaker 2: to push the blame on frontline employees or others. Maybe 782 00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:57,879 Speaker 2: they're not, you know, low paid, but to say, well, 783 00:50:58,040 --> 00:51:02,400 Speaker 2: was a rogue actor within within the bank or within 784 00:51:02,440 --> 00:51:06,680 Speaker 2: the financial institution and chuck. This is not just true 785 00:51:07,000 --> 00:51:10,720 Speaker 2: of the financial crisis. This has been true of many 786 00:51:10,840 --> 00:51:15,880 Speaker 2: other big corporate scandals too. And I think that once again, 787 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:21,160 Speaker 2: we are supposed to be a nation of laws where 788 00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:24,160 Speaker 2: people are supposed to adhere to those laws, and if 789 00:51:24,200 --> 00:51:29,160 Speaker 2: they don't, they are held accountable. And I think when 790 00:51:29,200 --> 00:51:33,600 Speaker 2: you don't have that, that is just another signal that 791 00:51:33,760 --> 00:51:38,279 Speaker 2: maybe the answer isn't to follow the law. Maybe it 792 00:51:38,480 --> 00:51:43,120 Speaker 2: is to push the envelope so far and then deal 793 00:51:43,160 --> 00:51:46,839 Speaker 2: with figure out how political power to lobby yourselves out 794 00:51:46,880 --> 00:51:47,120 Speaker 2: of it. 795 00:51:47,200 --> 00:51:52,600 Speaker 1: I mean, I could easily picture somebody at a financial 796 00:51:52,600 --> 00:51:56,919 Speaker 1: institution saying, by the time they figure it out, we're 797 00:51:56,960 --> 00:51:59,920 Speaker 1: going to be so much further down the road financially 798 00:52:00,080 --> 00:52:04,920 Speaker 1: that we're too big to fail, we're too big to punish, 799 00:52:05,000 --> 00:52:07,680 Speaker 1: we're too big to bring charges on. I mean, do 800 00:52:07,719 --> 00:52:10,239 Speaker 1: you think it feels like that was the mindset? 801 00:52:10,480 --> 00:52:16,240 Speaker 2: Well, in fact, there was concerns about this with Attorney 802 00:52:16,360 --> 00:52:20,919 Speaker 2: General Holder at the time about concerns, and he said 803 00:52:21,000 --> 00:52:25,000 Speaker 2: it about concerns about prosecuting some of these large financial 804 00:52:25,000 --> 00:52:32,360 Speaker 2: institutions because of potential market disruptions. So when too, there's 805 00:52:32,400 --> 00:52:35,880 Speaker 2: too big to fail, too big to jail, and the 806 00:52:35,960 --> 00:52:39,359 Speaker 2: list goes on and Chuck, I will tell you that 807 00:52:40,080 --> 00:52:45,840 Speaker 2: the accountability isn't just for those firms. Yeah, there is 808 00:52:45,880 --> 00:52:49,399 Speaker 2: also a sense, I think this is true in both 809 00:52:49,440 --> 00:52:57,600 Speaker 2: political parties, that senior officials, politicians, cabinet secretaries who were 810 00:52:57,640 --> 00:53:03,200 Speaker 2: involved in supposed to policing all of this, and in 811 00:53:03,280 --> 00:53:07,040 Speaker 2: fact they just seem to keep getting jobs and keep 812 00:53:07,080 --> 00:53:11,160 Speaker 2: holding positions of power. There is no question that under 813 00:53:11,160 --> 00:53:15,560 Speaker 2: the George W. Bush administration, the deregulation was a pivotal 814 00:53:15,880 --> 00:53:20,920 Speaker 2: reason for the financial crisis, But even those of us 815 00:53:20,960 --> 00:53:24,479 Speaker 2: who identify as Democrats would admit that in the late 816 00:53:24,560 --> 00:53:29,239 Speaker 2: nineteen nineties the choice by top Treasury officials and the 817 00:53:29,280 --> 00:53:35,600 Speaker 2: Clinton administration to massively deregulate, of course, had a major 818 00:53:35,800 --> 00:53:40,440 Speaker 2: role in the financial system melting down and destroying trillions 819 00:53:40,440 --> 00:53:43,640 Speaker 2: of wealth. And I hope that we keep that in 820 00:53:43,760 --> 00:53:49,880 Speaker 2: mind when we determine who should be the stewards of policymaking. 821 00:53:50,960 --> 00:53:55,839 Speaker 1: Are you making the case that basically because because there 822 00:53:55,840 --> 00:53:59,000 Speaker 1: were bad actors in both parties, that in some ways 823 00:53:59,080 --> 00:54:02,279 Speaker 1: it was easier to move on than do nobody want. 824 00:54:02,640 --> 00:54:07,120 Speaker 1: Nobody wanted to see where these investigations would go, because 825 00:54:08,400 --> 00:54:12,200 Speaker 1: there were too many friends that might get scooped up 826 00:54:12,200 --> 00:54:14,319 Speaker 1: in this swooped up in this investigation. 827 00:54:14,719 --> 00:54:17,319 Speaker 2: I don't know. I think it's more of that law, 828 00:54:17,320 --> 00:54:21,359 Speaker 2: and there's lots of federal agencies that give white glove 829 00:54:21,440 --> 00:54:25,239 Speaker 2: treatment to these big firms and big law firms. But 830 00:54:25,360 --> 00:54:28,759 Speaker 2: I also think there's a piece of this where we 831 00:54:28,840 --> 00:54:34,959 Speaker 2: should not have key officials who were supposed to be 832 00:54:35,000 --> 00:54:41,160 Speaker 2: guarding against the financial crisis guarding against these major breakdowns 833 00:54:41,920 --> 00:54:45,400 Speaker 2: to continue to wield lots of power in our system. 834 00:54:45,800 --> 00:54:47,879 Speaker 2: And I think that is what we are seeing right 835 00:54:47,920 --> 00:54:52,520 Speaker 2: now happening in our politics, that people are feeling like 836 00:54:52,600 --> 00:54:57,000 Speaker 2: there is a click of companies and individuals who just 837 00:54:57,560 --> 00:55:01,600 Speaker 2: don't face any consequences. And I think that's what people 838 00:55:01,680 --> 00:55:02,560 Speaker 2: want to move past. 839 00:55:02,840 --> 00:55:05,920 Speaker 1: Oh, I think there's another populist firestorm coming. You know, 840 00:55:06,000 --> 00:55:09,719 Speaker 1: if you could argue that Trump was a cultural populist, 841 00:55:10,280 --> 00:55:12,680 Speaker 1: it was not an economic populist, even though he wants 842 00:55:12,719 --> 00:55:15,920 Speaker 1: to claim he's want But I wonder if there's going 843 00:55:16,000 --> 00:55:20,560 Speaker 1: to be this sort of Teddy Roosevelt like revolt right now. 844 00:55:20,719 --> 00:55:24,920 Speaker 1: I mean, it does feel like we're repeating, at least 845 00:55:25,000 --> 00:55:28,520 Speaker 1: or rhyming with some of the late nineteenth century early 846 00:55:28,560 --> 00:55:33,080 Speaker 1: twentieth century relationships a government and industry had. 847 00:55:33,560 --> 00:55:36,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, and this is what the challenge is going forward. 848 00:55:36,400 --> 00:55:41,240 Speaker 2: We need I am the first to say, we want 849 00:55:41,280 --> 00:55:46,520 Speaker 2: there to be lots of businesses, lots of enterprise, lots 850 00:55:46,520 --> 00:55:50,560 Speaker 2: of new companies, but we don't want them to be 851 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:56,520 Speaker 2: so big and concentrated that they take over from politics, 852 00:55:57,080 --> 00:55:59,520 Speaker 2: and that they are not subject to the laws of 853 00:55:59,600 --> 00:56:01,719 Speaker 2: the land, and that each and every one of us 854 00:56:01,800 --> 00:56:02,520 Speaker 2: is opposed to it. 855 00:56:02,600 --> 00:56:10,120 Speaker 1: Here too well roh, hen I feel more informed and 856 00:56:10,160 --> 00:56:13,879 Speaker 1: more angry. So well done, I guess well. 857 00:56:13,920 --> 00:56:18,440 Speaker 2: You know, anger isn't always bad, but you have to 858 00:56:18,560 --> 00:56:21,239 Speaker 2: channel it into doing something. And I think too many 859 00:56:21,280 --> 00:56:24,440 Speaker 2: people right now are tuning out because they are mad, 860 00:56:25,080 --> 00:56:26,320 Speaker 2: but they actually need. 861 00:56:26,200 --> 00:56:27,920 Speaker 1: To do I kind of think they've lost trust in 862 00:56:27,960 --> 00:56:29,920 Speaker 1: both parties to do the right thing. And I don't 863 00:56:29,960 --> 00:56:32,480 Speaker 1: blame them, because when the chips were down, did the 864 00:56:32,480 --> 00:56:34,560 Speaker 1: parties do the right thing? The answer is no. 865 00:56:35,480 --> 00:56:38,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, they've lost trust in the media, They've lost trust 866 00:56:38,200 --> 00:56:42,520 Speaker 2: in so many institutions. But again, tuning out is not 867 00:56:42,640 --> 00:56:46,200 Speaker 2: the answer. It is to fix the system, no matter 868 00:56:46,239 --> 00:56:47,080 Speaker 2: how rotten it is. 869 00:56:47,600 --> 00:56:50,040 Speaker 1: And you think we have all the agencies we need, 870 00:56:50,440 --> 00:56:57,200 Speaker 1: We just need more resources and teeth, you know want. 871 00:56:57,280 --> 00:57:01,120 Speaker 2: I don't want Americans have to learn the alphabet soup 872 00:57:01,160 --> 00:57:05,799 Speaker 2: of agencies. I just want people to feel they have 873 00:57:05,920 --> 00:57:12,480 Speaker 2: control over their government to prosecute law breaking and to 874 00:57:12,640 --> 00:57:17,520 Speaker 2: protect people from these abuses, and frankly, so that their 875 00:57:17,560 --> 00:57:24,040 Speaker 2: government is responsive when dealing with the unbelievable challenges we face, 876 00:57:24,120 --> 00:57:28,440 Speaker 2: whether it is technology and AI or the high prices 877 00:57:28,480 --> 00:57:32,200 Speaker 2: that people are paying for college and for groceries and 878 00:57:32,240 --> 00:57:35,200 Speaker 2: they haven't seen that. And the way to do that 879 00:57:35,360 --> 00:57:40,680 Speaker 2: is to make sure the politicians and leaders are standing 880 00:57:40,760 --> 00:57:43,120 Speaker 2: up to these concentrated corporate interests. 881 00:57:43,400 --> 00:57:49,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, it does feel as if it is even if 882 00:57:49,680 --> 00:57:53,439 Speaker 1: the regulation is taking place, the public doesn't quite see it. Right. 883 00:57:54,000 --> 00:57:57,240 Speaker 1: Do you think what advice would you give a future 884 00:57:58,680 --> 00:58:01,000 Speaker 1: head of CFPB. Would you tell them that they've got 885 00:58:01,040 --> 00:58:04,400 Speaker 1: to sort of be more of a public person, that 886 00:58:04,400 --> 00:58:06,600 Speaker 1: they got to explain their actions more, they got to 887 00:58:06,600 --> 00:58:12,040 Speaker 1: bring people in. I mean, it feels like now every 888 00:58:12,160 --> 00:58:14,520 Speaker 1: entity has to have a communications strategy if you want 889 00:58:14,560 --> 00:58:17,880 Speaker 1: to sort of protect your financing or protect your credibility. 890 00:58:18,440 --> 00:58:20,480 Speaker 1: And I hate that, you know, in some ways, I 891 00:58:20,480 --> 00:58:24,040 Speaker 1: don't want our regulators to become well known because in 892 00:58:24,080 --> 00:58:28,520 Speaker 1: many ways that might undermine their ability to regulate an 893 00:58:28,560 --> 00:58:31,880 Speaker 1: industry where a person gets singled out and gets turned 894 00:58:31,880 --> 00:58:38,280 Speaker 1: into a political weapon in order to cover up what 895 00:58:38,320 --> 00:58:40,600 Speaker 1: it is that person's looking for. But it does feel 896 00:58:40,600 --> 00:58:43,480 Speaker 1: as if you do kind of need to let the 897 00:58:43,480 --> 00:58:46,200 Speaker 1: public know what this agency is supposed to be doing. 898 00:58:46,920 --> 00:58:52,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's really a push, especially for whoever 899 00:58:52,200 --> 00:58:57,120 Speaker 2: will be president next and after that if they are 900 00:58:57,320 --> 00:59:04,200 Speaker 2: not energetically explain how if they are pushing to improve 901 00:59:04,240 --> 00:59:08,760 Speaker 2: people's lives. I think that's been true for centuries, and 902 00:59:08,800 --> 00:59:12,680 Speaker 2: those who succeed are the ones who let the public 903 00:59:12,840 --> 00:59:16,440 Speaker 2: know what they are doing and who they are up against. 904 00:59:16,600 --> 00:59:18,400 Speaker 1: Let say, I see it state. I used to joke 905 00:59:18,440 --> 00:59:21,680 Speaker 1: that AG was short for aspiring governor if you were 906 00:59:21,680 --> 00:59:25,640 Speaker 1: a state AG. But you know what the state ags 907 00:59:25,720 --> 00:59:29,560 Speaker 1: that became governor, it's because they were explaining to the 908 00:59:29,560 --> 00:59:30,520 Speaker 1: public what they were doing. 909 00:59:31,280 --> 00:59:32,720 Speaker 2: That's exactly right, vanity they. 910 00:59:32,600 --> 00:59:36,680 Speaker 1: Were going on, and usually it was consumer protection that 911 00:59:36,800 --> 00:59:39,000 Speaker 1: was at the heart, and that's the most bipartisan thing 912 00:59:39,040 --> 00:59:39,440 Speaker 1: you could do. 913 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:45,080 Speaker 2: I think that I feel pretty proud that the CFPB 914 00:59:45,440 --> 00:59:51,840 Speaker 2: helped to eliminate billions and billions of dollars in junk fees, 915 00:59:51,960 --> 00:59:56,720 Speaker 2: whether it's illegal overdraft fees or being nickeled and dime 916 00:59:56,840 --> 01:00:02,480 Speaker 2: wherever you are. But you're right, it does mean that 917 01:00:04,480 --> 01:00:09,240 Speaker 2: presidents others they need to explain everything that they are doing. 918 01:00:09,560 --> 01:00:12,760 Speaker 1: Now they do. I mean it, You know you can't. Yes, 919 01:00:12,880 --> 01:00:17,080 Speaker 1: citizenship comes with some responsibility, but people have other things 920 01:00:17,080 --> 01:00:19,680 Speaker 1: in their lives and you can't expect them to do 921 01:00:19,720 --> 01:00:20,000 Speaker 1: all the. 922 01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:23,960 Speaker 2: Research that's exactly right. They are just trying to run 923 01:00:24,040 --> 01:00:27,280 Speaker 2: on that treadmill to stay afloat, and it's our job 924 01:00:27,320 --> 01:00:29,080 Speaker 2: to slow that treadmil. 925 01:00:28,800 --> 01:00:32,120 Speaker 1: What are you doing now? What does a former regulator 926 01:00:32,160 --> 01:00:33,720 Speaker 1: do when they're in the private sector. 927 01:00:34,040 --> 01:00:36,960 Speaker 2: I'm not in the private sector. I am still trying 928 01:00:37,000 --> 01:00:40,520 Speaker 2: to figure out what do we do to make sure 929 01:00:40,560 --> 01:00:44,680 Speaker 2: that we fix this broken economy. And I'm spending a 930 01:00:44,680 --> 01:00:47,720 Speaker 2: lot of time helping out people in the States, whether 931 01:00:47,760 --> 01:00:51,480 Speaker 2: it's state ags and others do their part to fix it. 932 01:00:52,840 --> 01:00:55,480 Speaker 1: Robi Choprah, Like I said, I feel smarter about it. 933 01:00:55,640 --> 01:00:58,040 Speaker 1: And that's what I was hoping my listeners would get 934 01:00:58,040 --> 01:01:00,320 Speaker 1: out of this and viewers and just understand day and that, 935 01:01:01,600 --> 01:01:04,800 Speaker 1: you know, I think I think one of the mistakes 936 01:01:04,800 --> 01:01:08,920 Speaker 1: that journalism has made is not enough consumer fronting investigations. 937 01:01:08,960 --> 01:01:13,280 Speaker 1: There's too many investigations that are about getting famous people 938 01:01:13,920 --> 01:01:19,680 Speaker 1: in you know, attention, rather than like, you know, just 939 01:01:19,760 --> 01:01:22,960 Speaker 1: helping people save money or not get ripped off. And 940 01:01:23,560 --> 01:01:26,040 Speaker 1: whether you're in government or you're in media, if you're 941 01:01:26,080 --> 01:01:30,400 Speaker 1: focused on consumer protection, that's how you're in trust. You're here, 942 01:01:31,040 --> 01:01:32,640 Speaker 1: all right, my friend, I appreciate the time. 943 01:01:32,800 --> 01:01:33,439 Speaker 2: Thanks so much.