WEBVTT - Trump's "Dangerous" Iran Policy

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.876
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background the show

0:00:22.916 --> 0:00:25.916
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.316 --> 0:00:31.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Is Donald Trump leading US into war

0:00:31.196 --> 0:00:35.396
<v Speaker 1>with Iran? One of the signature accomplishments, maybe the signature

0:00:35.396 --> 0:00:38.796
<v Speaker 1>accomplishment of Barack Obama's administration in foreign policy, was a

0:00:38.876 --> 0:00:42.796
<v Speaker 1>complex multi party deal between the United States and Iran

0:00:43.196 --> 0:00:46.756
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately guaranteed that the United States would increasingly allow

0:00:46.796 --> 0:00:50.996
<v Speaker 1>a normalization of international relations for Iran in exchange for

0:00:51.116 --> 0:00:55.396
<v Speaker 1>Iran holding back on its nuclear ambitions. Donald Trump came

0:00:55.436 --> 0:00:58.756
<v Speaker 1>into office having intensely criticized that plan, and since then

0:00:58.836 --> 0:01:02.316
<v Speaker 1>he's adopted a systematic strategy intended to put the screws

0:01:02.356 --> 0:01:06.356
<v Speaker 1>on Iran. But what options does that leave Iran? In

0:01:06.476 --> 0:01:12.356
<v Speaker 1>response to discuss this extremely pressing and worrisome topic, I'm

0:01:12.396 --> 0:01:16.036
<v Speaker 1>thrilled to have with me. Vali Nasser Vali is a

0:01:16.076 --> 0:01:19.596
<v Speaker 1>Middle East scholar, a foreign policy advisor, and a commentator

0:01:19.596 --> 0:01:23.676
<v Speaker 1>on international relations. From twenty and twelve until twenty nineteen,

0:01:23.836 --> 0:01:25.636
<v Speaker 1>he was the dean of the John Hopkins School of

0:01:25.676 --> 0:01:29.276
<v Speaker 1>Advanced International Studies in Washington, DC, and he was a

0:01:29.276 --> 0:01:32.956
<v Speaker 1>special advisor before that in the Obama administration focusing on

0:01:33.196 --> 0:01:37.036
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan and Pakistan policy. There's nobody that I can think

0:01:37.076 --> 0:01:40.596
<v Speaker 1>of better qualified to talk about these issues. VALI welcome,

0:01:40.796 --> 0:01:43.316
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. So I want to start by asking you

0:01:43.916 --> 0:01:46.596
<v Speaker 1>how bad do you think things are at this moment.

0:01:47.996 --> 0:01:51.876
<v Speaker 1>I think they are. They are bad largely because the

0:01:52.036 --> 0:01:56.636
<v Speaker 1>President's strategy with their on at one level looks like

0:01:56.756 --> 0:02:00.876
<v Speaker 1>very it's very clear. At another level it actually is

0:02:01.196 --> 0:02:04.716
<v Speaker 1>somewhat rather less so. President Trump walked away from the

0:02:04.836 --> 0:02:08.396
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal and very successfully put a tremendous amount of

0:02:08.396 --> 0:02:13.156
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Europeans, Chinese, Indians, Russians to stop trading with

0:02:13.196 --> 0:02:18.556
<v Speaker 1>Iran and to try to crush Iran's economy. It wasn't

0:02:18.596 --> 0:02:21.436
<v Speaker 1>clear what the purpose is. He said, well, the purpose

0:02:21.436 --> 0:02:23.716
<v Speaker 1>that the maximum pressure is to bring Iran to the

0:02:23.796 --> 0:02:28.356
<v Speaker 1>table so that they would negotiate. His national security advisor

0:02:28.476 --> 0:02:31.596
<v Speaker 1>and his Secretary of State seemed to be suggesting that

0:02:31.596 --> 0:02:34.436
<v Speaker 1>the goal is something much bigger. You know, there words

0:02:35.276 --> 0:02:40.276
<v Speaker 1>expelling Iran literally from Middle East, out of Iraq's area, Afhanistan,

0:02:40.996 --> 0:02:45.596
<v Speaker 1>the Persian Gulf, Yemen, but even further, perhaps pushing for

0:02:45.756 --> 0:02:49.876
<v Speaker 1>regime change in Iran. Trump seems to be essentially talking

0:02:49.876 --> 0:02:52.436
<v Speaker 1>from the both side of his mouth, escalating pressure very

0:02:52.516 --> 0:02:56.516
<v Speaker 1>dangerously narrowing the field for diplomacy, and yet saying that

0:02:56.596 --> 0:02:59.436
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want war and he wants to talk. But

0:02:59.516 --> 0:03:03.116
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, he hasn't created any way in which

0:03:03.436 --> 0:03:06.796
<v Speaker 1>the two sides can literally climb down from the tree

0:03:07.196 --> 0:03:12.916
<v Speaker 1>and engage. In fact, Secretary Pompeo and President Trump as rhetorics,

0:03:13.396 --> 0:03:17.756
<v Speaker 1>continuously makes it almost impossible to engage in any kind

0:03:17.756 --> 0:03:21.996
<v Speaker 1>of fruitful talks. So you mentioned, and I think you're

0:03:22.036 --> 0:03:24.556
<v Speaker 1>completely right that the administration sounds like it has two

0:03:24.556 --> 0:03:28.236
<v Speaker 1>different Iran policies. Trump says that he wants to do

0:03:28.356 --> 0:03:30.836
<v Speaker 1>something very similar to the policy that he's tried to

0:03:30.876 --> 0:03:33.236
<v Speaker 1>pursue with everybody else in the world, namely, up the

0:03:33.276 --> 0:03:36.596
<v Speaker 1>pressure on them to get the renegotiation of some pre

0:03:36.676 --> 0:03:39.516
<v Speaker 1>existing deal that he doesn't like. And you know, that's

0:03:39.556 --> 0:03:43.756
<v Speaker 1>Trump talking about NAFTA, that's Trump talking about trade with China,

0:03:43.836 --> 0:03:46.276
<v Speaker 1>that's Trump talking about North Korea. I mean, that's just

0:03:46.356 --> 0:03:48.716
<v Speaker 1>his If he has a vision of how to do

0:03:48.836 --> 0:03:52.276
<v Speaker 1>things in life, that's the vision. But that, of course,

0:03:52.316 --> 0:03:56.316
<v Speaker 1>as you say, implies actual deal making at the end

0:03:56.356 --> 0:04:01.716
<v Speaker 1>of the process. And then you have the Bolton Pompeo view, which,

0:04:01.756 --> 0:04:04.436
<v Speaker 1>as you say, sometimes seems like it's even varying to

0:04:04.436 --> 0:04:06.836
<v Speaker 1>the point of calling for regime change, where the punchline

0:04:06.916 --> 0:04:09.956
<v Speaker 1>is not we talk to you. The punchline is the opposite,

0:04:09.996 --> 0:04:11.756
<v Speaker 1>We want you to come, we want you to be

0:04:11.916 --> 0:04:14.916
<v Speaker 1>to be brought down. Now, I want to ask whether

0:04:14.956 --> 0:04:21.276
<v Speaker 1>that incoherence is seen in in your mind as genuine incoherence.

0:04:21.356 --> 0:04:23.596
<v Speaker 1>Is it the result of just Trump thinking something different

0:04:23.836 --> 0:04:26.076
<v Speaker 1>from what is national security advisor and his secretary of

0:04:26.116 --> 0:04:29.116
<v Speaker 1>State think, or is it more sophisticated than that. Is

0:04:29.116 --> 0:04:32.516
<v Speaker 1>it a kind of two pronged approach where Trump knows

0:04:32.636 --> 0:04:36.636
<v Speaker 1>that the hard line from Bolton and Pompeo strengthens his threat,

0:04:36.716 --> 0:04:39.236
<v Speaker 1>makes him more credible as a threat, and hopes that

0:04:39.276 --> 0:04:41.516
<v Speaker 1>he can then say to the Iranians, Look, you know,

0:04:41.516 --> 0:04:43.876
<v Speaker 1>I have to deal with my Secretary of State of

0:04:43.916 --> 0:04:46.196
<v Speaker 1>my national security advisor, so I have to stay tough

0:04:46.196 --> 0:04:48.956
<v Speaker 1>with you, but look, I will intervene and do a

0:04:49.036 --> 0:04:50.676
<v Speaker 1>deal with you. Do so, do you think the US

0:04:50.716 --> 0:04:53.876
<v Speaker 1>side is incoherent or that Trump is crazy like a fox?

0:04:54.836 --> 0:04:57.956
<v Speaker 1>I think increasingly over the past two years, people have

0:04:58.036 --> 0:05:01.036
<v Speaker 1>come to let's say the Iranians have come to conclude

0:05:01.036 --> 0:05:09.476
<v Speaker 1>that it's incoherence that ultimately Trump has one agenda, which

0:05:09.516 --> 0:05:11.876
<v Speaker 1>is to have talks. He says he doesn't want war,

0:05:12.516 --> 0:05:16.716
<v Speaker 1>and then he's employed people who essentially are pursuing a

0:05:16.796 --> 0:05:19.316
<v Speaker 1>very different strategy. And then, you know, the Iranians compare

0:05:19.396 --> 0:05:22.836
<v Speaker 1>notes with the North Koreans, and the North Korean assumptions

0:05:22.876 --> 0:05:25.116
<v Speaker 1>is the same that you can go in a room

0:05:25.156 --> 0:05:27.356
<v Speaker 1>and make any kind of an agreement with Trump, you

0:05:27.436 --> 0:05:32.156
<v Speaker 1>come out and Pompeo and Bolton shredded to pieces. So

0:05:32.196 --> 0:05:35.236
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians have come to see that, yes, Trump doesn't

0:05:35.236 --> 0:05:38.116
<v Speaker 1>want war, but even if you met with Trump and

0:05:38.156 --> 0:05:41.796
<v Speaker 1>you had an agreement, how does this go forward when

0:05:41.876 --> 0:05:44.436
<v Speaker 1>the people who are in charge of actually carrying the

0:05:44.476 --> 0:05:47.356
<v Speaker 1>ball forward after the principles as we call him, that

0:05:47.396 --> 0:05:50.956
<v Speaker 1>the sort of heads of government's meet actually have no

0:05:51.356 --> 0:05:54.996
<v Speaker 1>desire for this to work, and Trump doesn't seem to

0:05:54.996 --> 0:05:57.556
<v Speaker 1>be able to rein him in. So now let's tack

0:05:57.636 --> 0:06:00.996
<v Speaker 1>to the side of the Iranian perspective. So you're dealing

0:06:01.116 --> 0:06:04.396
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you're, you know, advising the Iranian government, and

0:06:04.796 --> 0:06:07.916
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian government is dealing with a government in the

0:06:07.996 --> 0:06:10.676
<v Speaker 1>United States that has two different approaches that are in

0:06:10.676 --> 0:06:13.276
<v Speaker 1>contradiction with each other, and it can't really expect that

0:06:13.356 --> 0:06:15.716
<v Speaker 1>any true deal is going to come out. There won't be,

0:06:15.796 --> 0:06:20.036
<v Speaker 1>as you say, shredded by Bolton and Pompeo. So what's

0:06:20.076 --> 0:06:23.636
<v Speaker 1>the wisest strategy for Iran to pursuer? What can Iran

0:06:23.716 --> 0:06:27.396
<v Speaker 1>do faced with that set of circumstances and added to

0:06:27.476 --> 0:06:29.916
<v Speaker 1>that the part that is having a huge effect on them,

0:06:29.996 --> 0:06:36.036
<v Speaker 1>namely the significant crackdown on their trading capacities. First, let

0:06:36.036 --> 0:06:39.356
<v Speaker 1>me backtrack. So when Trump came out of the nuclear deal,

0:06:39.356 --> 0:06:42.556
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians didn't really react in a big way. There

0:06:42.636 --> 0:06:47.516
<v Speaker 1>was no uptick in anything in particular. They adopted something

0:06:47.556 --> 0:06:51.116
<v Speaker 1>they call a strategic patients. So let's see, they's waited

0:06:51.156 --> 0:06:54.636
<v Speaker 1>out and hopefully the Europeans, Chinese and the Russians will

0:06:54.716 --> 0:06:57.516
<v Speaker 1>be able to create enough trade to just keep things

0:06:57.636 --> 0:06:59.996
<v Speaker 1>going and you could kick the ball down the road.

0:07:00.476 --> 0:07:03.756
<v Speaker 1>The Europeans didn't come through. Maximum pressure proved to be

0:07:03.836 --> 0:07:08.076
<v Speaker 1>extremely effective, and the Iranians decided that that the statusco

0:07:08.236 --> 0:07:12.716
<v Speaker 1>is generally not sustainable. I mean Trump is perfectly free

0:07:12.796 --> 0:07:16.636
<v Speaker 1>to escalate pressure every five months six months, and the

0:07:16.676 --> 0:07:22.556
<v Speaker 1>Europeans and Chinese, Russians, Indians make you growl, but they're

0:07:22.556 --> 0:07:24.676
<v Speaker 1>just going to go along with the American pressure and

0:07:24.756 --> 0:07:27.956
<v Speaker 1>eventually this can either break the regime or it's going

0:07:27.996 --> 0:07:30.596
<v Speaker 1>to lead to war or something worse. So how do

0:07:30.596 --> 0:07:32.996
<v Speaker 1>you break the impast And you can do it in

0:07:33.036 --> 0:07:36.236
<v Speaker 1>two ways. You could basically show up for talks and

0:07:36.276 --> 0:07:38.796
<v Speaker 1>you hope that that actually would create a wedge between

0:07:39.316 --> 0:07:42.076
<v Speaker 1>Bolton Pompey on the one side and Trump on the other,

0:07:43.156 --> 0:07:47.356
<v Speaker 1>or that you can actually escalate in kind, bring it

0:07:47.396 --> 0:07:50.156
<v Speaker 1>to the brink of war, hoping that that also would

0:07:50.196 --> 0:07:53.996
<v Speaker 1>create a wedge between national security advisors who are happy

0:07:54.036 --> 0:07:56.556
<v Speaker 1>to go to war and Trump, who really doesn't want

0:07:56.556 --> 0:07:59.356
<v Speaker 1>to go to war. The first scenario I think the

0:07:59.436 --> 0:08:03.076
<v Speaker 1>Iranians decided was not for them because, unlike North Korea,

0:08:03.516 --> 0:08:05.916
<v Speaker 1>they actually don't have a nuclear weapon, so they don't

0:08:05.916 --> 0:08:09.076
<v Speaker 1>have much to bargain with the US right now. Whatever

0:08:09.236 --> 0:08:11.916
<v Speaker 1>they had they cashed it in to get the deal

0:08:11.996 --> 0:08:16.316
<v Speaker 1>with Obama. Secondly, they do have domestic politics, and Trump

0:08:16.716 --> 0:08:20.876
<v Speaker 1>and Pompeio have left very little room for anybody in

0:08:20.916 --> 0:08:23.916
<v Speaker 1>Iran to be able to come to the table given

0:08:23.956 --> 0:08:27.876
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric coming out of Washington and Thirdly, the irun

0:08:28.076 --> 0:08:30.596
<v Speaker 1>Is also understand that, unlike North Korea, there is a

0:08:30.716 --> 0:08:34.396
<v Speaker 1>very entrenched and powerful anti Iran and anti talking to

0:08:34.476 --> 0:08:38.356
<v Speaker 1>Iran lobby in the United States, perhaps even led by

0:08:38.516 --> 0:08:43.196
<v Speaker 1>Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahoo, who is very opposed to this idea,

0:08:43.356 --> 0:08:46.716
<v Speaker 1>and that Trump, you know, they could end up meeting

0:08:46.716 --> 0:08:51.116
<v Speaker 1>with Trump. Trump gets this photo opportunity, but there's not

0:08:51.196 --> 0:08:54.876
<v Speaker 1>going to be much American appetite for actually doing something,

0:08:54.956 --> 0:08:57.876
<v Speaker 1>so this is not really the time to talk. On

0:08:57.916 --> 0:09:01.196
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, they decided that if you escalate, if

0:09:01.196 --> 0:09:04.636
<v Speaker 1>you hit tankers, if you shot an down an American drone,

0:09:05.076 --> 0:09:08.876
<v Speaker 1>if you also talked about war, you will force Trump

0:09:08.876 --> 0:09:13.556
<v Speaker 1>to actually confront the consequences of his policy. And that

0:09:13.836 --> 0:09:17.036
<v Speaker 1>would also force first of all, would put it on

0:09:17.036 --> 0:09:20.356
<v Speaker 1>at a much higher level on his radar so that

0:09:20.796 --> 0:09:23.716
<v Speaker 1>he would actually pay attention to what his minions are doing.

0:09:24.516 --> 0:09:26.796
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, that he would create a wedge. And I

0:09:26.796 --> 0:09:30.036
<v Speaker 1>think they running strategy has worked. So when they shut

0:09:30.076 --> 0:09:33.116
<v Speaker 1>down the American drone, which was a very expensive drone

0:09:33.516 --> 0:09:36.396
<v Speaker 1>flying at thirty five thousand feet, they showed that they

0:09:36.436 --> 0:09:40.556
<v Speaker 1>both have the audacity essentially to push for what might

0:09:40.676 --> 0:09:42.876
<v Speaker 1>end up in war. But also they have capability to

0:09:42.916 --> 0:09:46.236
<v Speaker 1>inflict a lot of pain if the United States ended

0:09:46.316 --> 0:09:49.396
<v Speaker 1>up in war with Iran. And also I think they

0:09:49.436 --> 0:09:55.036
<v Speaker 1>signaled to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, America's allies in the Gulf,

0:09:55.076 --> 0:09:57.356
<v Speaker 1>that they will take the war to them as well,

0:09:57.516 --> 0:10:01.196
<v Speaker 1>and therefore this can get really ugly. And I think

0:10:01.676 --> 0:10:05.356
<v Speaker 1>they running conclusion was that this paid off. Trump came

0:10:05.396 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 1>to the edge of making a decision to punish it

0:10:08.436 --> 0:10:10.676
<v Speaker 1>on for shooting down the drone, and then decided to

0:10:10.716 --> 0:10:15.596
<v Speaker 1>walk back, and that opened the wedge between him and

0:10:16.196 --> 0:10:21.956
<v Speaker 1>his national security team, head of CIA, national Security Advisor,

0:10:22.116 --> 0:10:26.316
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, all of whom had favored America flexing

0:10:26.356 --> 0:10:29.076
<v Speaker 1>its muscles in response to the shooting down of the drone.

0:10:29.436 --> 0:10:34.116
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Iranians see benefit in enforcing Trump

0:10:34.676 --> 0:10:39.396
<v Speaker 1>to think seriously about something other than maximum pressure bringing

0:10:39.396 --> 0:10:41.916
<v Speaker 1>Iran to the table, which is actually what Iran needs.

0:10:41.996 --> 0:10:45.076
<v Speaker 1>If it is to countenance coming to the table, it

0:10:45.196 --> 0:10:49.996
<v Speaker 1>needs the United States to give it some economic benefits,

0:10:50.796 --> 0:10:54.116
<v Speaker 1>relief some of the economic pressure. So the Iranians could

0:10:54.116 --> 0:10:56.996
<v Speaker 1>even tell their own population that talks is not surrender,

0:10:57.116 --> 0:11:00.476
<v Speaker 1>but rather they're getting something in exchange. For showing up

0:11:00.516 --> 0:11:04.316
<v Speaker 1>for talks, and also that Trump would probably have to

0:11:04.516 --> 0:11:07.676
<v Speaker 1>change his the team that's going to talk to Iran,

0:11:07.796 --> 0:11:10.076
<v Speaker 1>and we already saw that he toyed with the idea

0:11:10.076 --> 0:11:12.956
<v Speaker 1>of Rand Paul playing the role of an envoy. Right.

0:11:13.076 --> 0:11:15.916
<v Speaker 1>I am skeptical that Trump will do can do all

0:11:15.956 --> 0:11:19.476
<v Speaker 1>of this in an election year, but the Iranians may

0:11:19.516 --> 0:11:23.356
<v Speaker 1>have at least bought themselves time until after November twenty

0:11:23.396 --> 0:11:27.076
<v Speaker 1>twenty to see where we go from there. I think

0:11:27.076 --> 0:11:28.996
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And you know what I would like to

0:11:28.996 --> 0:11:31.556
<v Speaker 1>do is try to break it into a simple part

0:11:31.596 --> 0:11:33.756
<v Speaker 1>and a complicated part. The simple part seems to me

0:11:33.836 --> 0:11:37.316
<v Speaker 1>that by shooting down the drone, the Iranians basically said

0:11:37.356 --> 0:11:40.596
<v Speaker 1>to Trump, we're calling your bluff. Are you actually prepared

0:11:40.636 --> 0:11:44.476
<v Speaker 1>to use force against us? And it worked because Trump

0:11:44.596 --> 0:11:46.956
<v Speaker 1>whimped out, you know. I mean, one might think that

0:11:46.996 --> 0:11:48.836
<v Speaker 1>was a good thing or a bad thing, but from

0:11:48.836 --> 0:11:52.516
<v Speaker 1>their perspective, Trump did not retaliate in the end. That

0:11:52.876 --> 0:11:56.236
<v Speaker 1>to me seems like the straightforward part. The complicated part,

0:11:56.276 --> 0:11:59.756
<v Speaker 1>and it's almost mind bendingly complicated, is so now you're

0:11:59.756 --> 0:12:03.116
<v Speaker 1>Iran and you know that although Trump's foreign policy advisors

0:12:03.156 --> 0:12:05.756
<v Speaker 1>are going to keep telling him that he should use

0:12:05.796 --> 0:12:09.636
<v Speaker 1>force against Iran, He's almost certainly not going to do it.

0:12:09.716 --> 0:12:14.756
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want actual violence, but he does want to

0:12:14.836 --> 0:12:19.916
<v Speaker 1>stick with the weaking of Iran via economic sanctions, and

0:12:19.996 --> 0:12:22.916
<v Speaker 1>maybe that arrangement is one that he's perfectly happy to continue,

0:12:22.916 --> 0:12:26.116
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even his advisers are happy to continue it.

0:12:26.316 --> 0:12:30.236
<v Speaker 1>And from Iran's perspective, there's not much obvious that you

0:12:30.236 --> 0:12:32.676
<v Speaker 1>can do in response. And this is really the crux

0:12:32.716 --> 0:12:34.876
<v Speaker 1>of what I'm trying to understand from the Iranian perspective.

0:12:34.916 --> 0:12:37.996
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they know that Trump is not likely

0:12:38.036 --> 0:12:41.236
<v Speaker 1>to compromise with them on the trade sanctions that are

0:12:41.316 --> 0:12:43.996
<v Speaker 1>hurting them so much, and they also know that he's

0:12:44.036 --> 0:12:47.916
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to use violence, what benefit do they

0:12:47.956 --> 0:12:50.756
<v Speaker 1>have in continuing to up the ante. They probably don't

0:12:50.796 --> 0:12:53.076
<v Speaker 1>have that much benefit. That they probably need to just

0:12:53.196 --> 0:12:55.676
<v Speaker 1>try to survive. Isn't that sort of the best strategy

0:12:55.716 --> 0:12:58.876
<v Speaker 1>available to them in that moment. Well, in the short run,

0:12:58.916 --> 0:13:01.076
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. But I don't think the Iranians can

0:13:01.116 --> 0:13:04.516
<v Speaker 1>sustain this situation for four years if Trump gets reelected,

0:13:05.196 --> 0:13:07.116
<v Speaker 1>So I think at some point in time they would

0:13:07.156 --> 0:13:09.876
<v Speaker 1>have to take the idea of talking to Trump seriously.

0:13:10.236 --> 0:13:11.796
<v Speaker 1>But what if he just doesn't want to talk. What

0:13:11.876 --> 0:13:14.796
<v Speaker 1>if he actually wants to say about talk about talking,

0:13:15.076 --> 0:13:17.876
<v Speaker 1>but Trump actually doesn't want to talk. I mean, one

0:13:17.876 --> 0:13:19.556
<v Speaker 1>thing that you have to keep in mind about Trump,

0:13:19.636 --> 0:13:21.476
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I'm sure the Iranians do think about this,

0:13:21.556 --> 0:13:24.356
<v Speaker 1>is he doesn't do foreign policy the way you and

0:13:24.396 --> 0:13:26.516
<v Speaker 1>I were brought up to think about foreign policy, where

0:13:26.556 --> 0:13:28.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were taught and we teach our students

0:13:28.716 --> 0:13:31.396
<v Speaker 1>choose your objective and then find the rational strategy to

0:13:31.396 --> 0:13:34.236
<v Speaker 1>pursue your objective. But Trump doesn't always do it that way.

0:13:34.316 --> 0:13:36.956
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes he just wants a perception to be created out there, say,

0:13:37.156 --> 0:13:41.996
<v Speaker 1>a perception of toughness aimed primarily to domestic audience. And

0:13:42.316 --> 0:13:44.116
<v Speaker 1>you know, his only constraint is he doesn't want to

0:13:44.116 --> 0:13:46.396
<v Speaker 1>be in a war. Then he does want to look tough,

0:13:46.436 --> 0:13:50.036
<v Speaker 1>and so in that sense, he's not very clearly pursuing

0:13:50.036 --> 0:13:52.116
<v Speaker 1>an objective. You know, you might give him a low

0:13:52.156 --> 0:13:54.156
<v Speaker 1>grade if he were teaching him in foreign policy, but

0:13:54.196 --> 0:13:55.956
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. He's the president of United States and

0:13:56.036 --> 0:13:59.436
<v Speaker 1>this is the policy that he's pursuing. Well, that's exactly

0:13:59.476 --> 0:14:04.156
<v Speaker 1>why this becomes very dangerous because ultimately you have to say, Okay,

0:14:04.156 --> 0:14:07.676
<v Speaker 1>what are Iran's options if Trump doesn't want to talk

0:14:07.676 --> 0:14:09.716
<v Speaker 1>to them and he just wants to apply pressure. So

0:14:09.756 --> 0:14:12.556
<v Speaker 1>either they have to say voluntarily we're going to dismantle

0:14:12.636 --> 0:14:16.276
<v Speaker 1>the regime, which is not likely to happen, right, or

0:14:16.316 --> 0:14:20.236
<v Speaker 1>that they actually, you know, go down the path of

0:14:20.276 --> 0:14:24.236
<v Speaker 1>trying to force Trump to choose between war and diplomacy,

0:14:24.796 --> 0:14:27.276
<v Speaker 1>so they get it to a point that even hanging

0:14:27.276 --> 0:14:29.036
<v Speaker 1>tough would mean that he has to go to war

0:14:29.116 --> 0:14:32.996
<v Speaker 1>with Iran or that he has to talk to them.

0:14:33.036 --> 0:14:35.716
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, you could say, the tables get turned.

0:14:36.316 --> 0:14:39.196
<v Speaker 1>So it's Trump that was originally putting maximum pressure to

0:14:39.196 --> 0:14:41.756
<v Speaker 1>get them to the table, and it could become Iran

0:14:41.836 --> 0:14:44.956
<v Speaker 1>that's putting maximum pressure on Trump to come to the table.

0:14:45.676 --> 0:14:48.956
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's exactly why the way in which

0:14:48.996 --> 0:14:53.556
<v Speaker 1>Trump does foreign policy is so dangerous, because you know,

0:14:53.636 --> 0:14:59.196
<v Speaker 1>he plays with fire without actually wanting to use force

0:14:59.316 --> 0:15:01.276
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to it. I think the point that

0:15:01.316 --> 0:15:03.796
<v Speaker 1>you're making, Valley is is hugely significant, and I think

0:15:04.076 --> 0:15:06.716
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been made clearly enough in the

0:15:06.756 --> 0:15:09.636
<v Speaker 1>minds at least of most Americans, even those who followed

0:15:09.636 --> 0:15:12.796
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy pretty closely. So let me say it. Say

0:15:12.796 --> 0:15:14.036
<v Speaker 1>it back to you and see if you tell me

0:15:14.036 --> 0:15:16.316
<v Speaker 1>if I'm getting it right. What I hear you saying

0:15:16.556 --> 0:15:19.836
<v Speaker 1>is that by pursuing this policy, Trump hasn't really taken

0:15:19.836 --> 0:15:22.836
<v Speaker 1>into account that he may push Iron to the point

0:15:22.876 --> 0:15:26.036
<v Speaker 1>where it feels it has to provoke a war, it

0:15:26.076 --> 0:15:27.916
<v Speaker 1>has to come very very close to provoking a war,

0:15:28.036 --> 0:15:31.676
<v Speaker 1>maybe actually provoke a war, just in order to get

0:15:31.716 --> 0:15:35.276
<v Speaker 1>Trump to negotiate and there by to put the power

0:15:35.316 --> 0:15:38.196
<v Speaker 1>in there on their side. And I guess the question

0:15:38.236 --> 0:15:41.156
<v Speaker 1>I have for you there is is that plausible from

0:15:41.156 --> 0:15:43.756
<v Speaker 1>me Iron's perspective? I mean, wouldn't a war? Of course

0:15:43.756 --> 0:15:46.276
<v Speaker 1>they could inflict damage on American allies, They could inflict

0:15:46.436 --> 0:15:48.796
<v Speaker 1>damage on the United States, They could inflict damage on

0:15:49.196 --> 0:15:52.316
<v Speaker 1>Israel and on Saudi Arabia and on the UAE. But

0:15:52.436 --> 0:15:56.516
<v Speaker 1>could they survive a genuine war? And if they couldn't,

0:15:57.276 --> 0:16:00.396
<v Speaker 1>then how much are they going to be willing to

0:16:00.476 --> 0:16:06.716
<v Speaker 1>risk going down that path? Well, you know, the dilemma

0:16:06.836 --> 0:16:09.636
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has created is that if you give Iran

0:16:10.036 --> 0:16:12.276
<v Speaker 1>only bad choices, they're going to pick one of the

0:16:12.356 --> 0:16:16.956
<v Speaker 1>bad choices. I mean, you know, I don't see this

0:16:17.036 --> 0:16:21.316
<v Speaker 1>region voluntarily dismantling. And now it's sort of a body

0:16:21.316 --> 0:16:23.956
<v Speaker 1>into the idea that you could force Trump to blink,

0:16:24.316 --> 0:16:26.556
<v Speaker 1>so they can go down that path of trying to

0:16:26.956 --> 0:16:30.116
<v Speaker 1>have him blink again and again, and they may make

0:16:30.156 --> 0:16:32.916
<v Speaker 1>a mistake or go one step too far and actually

0:16:33.036 --> 0:16:35.436
<v Speaker 1>end up getting a war. I think, you know, the

0:16:35.476 --> 0:16:38.116
<v Speaker 1>irony here is that neither the United States, or at

0:16:38.156 --> 0:16:42.156
<v Speaker 1>least neither Trump nor Iran want war right but there

0:16:42.276 --> 0:16:45.596
<v Speaker 1>is no room right now for anything else. You know,

0:16:45.636 --> 0:16:48.756
<v Speaker 1>as the Trump says the pathway to talks are there,

0:16:48.836 --> 0:16:53.956
<v Speaker 1>but that's not really the case. And therefore, you know,

0:16:53.996 --> 0:16:56.676
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the Iranians have very few options left

0:16:56.716 --> 0:17:01.676
<v Speaker 1>before them other than basically sitting and watching their country

0:17:01.716 --> 0:17:06.036
<v Speaker 1>come apart. And there are those within Iran's hardliners who

0:17:06.116 --> 0:17:07.716
<v Speaker 1>argued that, look, if we're going to end up in

0:17:07.716 --> 0:17:09.836
<v Speaker 1>a war with the United States, it's better we do

0:17:09.876 --> 0:17:12.236
<v Speaker 1>it now when we're still strong, than do it twenty

0:17:12.316 --> 0:17:14.676
<v Speaker 1>years from now. Has happened with Saddam, where nothing is

0:17:14.756 --> 0:17:18.676
<v Speaker 1>left of our institutions. And I think, you know, if

0:17:18.716 --> 0:17:22.676
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets reelected, the Iranians have to look at four

0:17:22.796 --> 0:17:26.356
<v Speaker 1>more years of the same policy, and then they have

0:17:26.436 --> 0:17:29.236
<v Speaker 1>to sort of calculate can they survive four more years

0:17:29.276 --> 0:17:34.196
<v Speaker 1>of the same thing, where every six months Trump keeps escalating,

0:17:35.196 --> 0:17:38.396
<v Speaker 1>or are they going to really force, you know, try

0:17:38.436 --> 0:17:41.756
<v Speaker 1>to force their way out of this situation. Either by

0:17:41.876 --> 0:17:44.916
<v Speaker 1>there are two ways of doing it. They audaciously give

0:17:44.996 --> 0:17:48.436
<v Speaker 1>him an offer of talks that that he can't refuse

0:17:49.756 --> 0:17:52.356
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see that happening under this supreme leader.

0:17:53.316 --> 0:17:56.116
<v Speaker 1>Or they have to force Trump to really think about

0:17:56.156 --> 0:17:59.036
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the danger of war is imminent and

0:17:59.076 --> 0:18:02.356
<v Speaker 1>he needs to find a way out. So I want

0:18:02.396 --> 0:18:05.996
<v Speaker 1>to ask about what this means for moderates in Iran.

0:18:06.036 --> 0:18:09.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you describe the position that the hardliners take, namely,

0:18:09.996 --> 0:18:13.076
<v Speaker 1>betterify the war now when we have real leverage, then

0:18:13.156 --> 0:18:16.276
<v Speaker 1>at some later time. If you're an Iranian moderate and

0:18:16.276 --> 0:18:21.476
<v Speaker 1>you supported the deal with Obama and you thought that

0:18:21.556 --> 0:18:24.436
<v Speaker 1>Rohanni had done a good job by brokering that deal,

0:18:25.356 --> 0:18:27.316
<v Speaker 1>now do you have a leg to stand on. I mean,

0:18:27.356 --> 0:18:30.836
<v Speaker 1>I have moderates in Iran just been completely discredited by

0:18:30.876 --> 0:18:35.116
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the Trump policy. Yes, I think that's

0:18:35.156 --> 0:18:38.876
<v Speaker 1>one of the that's one of the tragedies of Trump's

0:18:38.876 --> 0:18:42.556
<v Speaker 1>policy towards Iran. So all the moderates have either been

0:18:43.196 --> 0:18:47.796
<v Speaker 1>marginalized or have been radicalized. Even the moderates are trying

0:18:47.836 --> 0:18:53.956
<v Speaker 1>to distance themselves from the nuclear deal, and in fact,

0:18:54.076 --> 0:18:57.916
<v Speaker 1>even in the past year, there was hope that still

0:18:57.956 --> 0:19:01.556
<v Speaker 1>the Moderates could sustain themselves if Europe actually had stood

0:19:01.596 --> 0:19:04.716
<v Speaker 1>up to Trump and tried to protect doing business with

0:19:04.796 --> 0:19:09.036
<v Speaker 1>Iran even at the risk of sanctions. And Europe folded completely.

0:19:09.876 --> 0:19:13.196
<v Speaker 1>There was no appetite in Europe in any way to

0:19:13.316 --> 0:19:18.156
<v Speaker 1>do something through central banks or governments and actually do

0:19:18.316 --> 0:19:20.956
<v Speaker 1>business with Iran in a way that would keep the

0:19:21.236 --> 0:19:28.196
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal genuinely alive, so that the moderates really don't

0:19:28.196 --> 0:19:32.156
<v Speaker 1>have anything to offer. And I think some presidential elections,

0:19:32.156 --> 0:19:38.196
<v Speaker 1>parliamentary elections, they're going to be completely sidelines. And in

0:19:38.236 --> 0:19:42.316
<v Speaker 1>a way, in an ironic way, Trump has achieved regime

0:19:42.396 --> 0:19:45.716
<v Speaker 1>change in Iran, except the wrong regime change. He's handed

0:19:45.716 --> 0:19:50.236
<v Speaker 1>Iran to militaristic hardliners who would be now very difficult

0:19:50.236 --> 0:19:53.596
<v Speaker 1>to dislodge going forward. I wanted to ask about the

0:19:53.636 --> 0:19:57.156
<v Speaker 1>Europeans and why they did fold so immediately and completely.

0:19:57.196 --> 0:20:00.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, when when the obaministration was putting the finishing

0:20:00.956 --> 0:20:04.076
<v Speaker 1>touches on the Iran Deal, one of the structures that

0:20:04.596 --> 0:20:08.516
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be actually desirable was that even if the

0:20:08.636 --> 0:20:11.196
<v Speaker 1>United Dates were to back out of the deal in

0:20:11.196 --> 0:20:15.396
<v Speaker 1>a future administration, it was still nominally up to Europe

0:20:15.836 --> 0:20:18.276
<v Speaker 1>to continue to make its own judgment about whether Iran

0:20:18.316 --> 0:20:20.596
<v Speaker 1>had renected on the deal and therefore to continue trade.

0:20:21.036 --> 0:20:23.276
<v Speaker 1>And the theory at the time many people believe this,

0:20:23.316 --> 0:20:25.276
<v Speaker 1>I certainly thought it at the time was that this

0:20:25.356 --> 0:20:28.156
<v Speaker 1>was a good failsafe measure in the deal that even

0:20:28.156 --> 0:20:29.956
<v Speaker 1>if the United States backed out, it wouldn't really matter

0:20:29.996 --> 0:20:32.476
<v Speaker 1>the United States had backed out because Iran could still

0:20:32.476 --> 0:20:35.076
<v Speaker 1>do business with Europeans. But as you noted, the Trump

0:20:35.076 --> 0:20:39.236
<v Speaker 1>administration applied some pressure and the Europeans completely backed down.

0:20:39.836 --> 0:20:42.836
<v Speaker 1>Why is that just because they have so many of

0:20:42.836 --> 0:20:44.516
<v Speaker 1>their own worries about Trump that they don't want to

0:20:44.516 --> 0:20:47.236
<v Speaker 1>annoy him about Iran or is it based on any

0:20:47.276 --> 0:20:51.876
<v Speaker 1>actual attitude towards Iran. I think they may hide behind

0:20:51.956 --> 0:20:55.756
<v Speaker 1>attitude towards Iran, like you know, because Iran has missiles

0:20:55.796 --> 0:20:57.956
<v Speaker 1>or his bola, this makes it difficult for us to

0:20:58.596 --> 0:21:01.156
<v Speaker 1>abide by the nuclear deal. But but the reality of

0:21:01.156 --> 0:21:05.396
<v Speaker 1>it is that Trump showed with Europe that the emperor

0:21:05.476 --> 0:21:08.676
<v Speaker 1>has no clothes, you know, as the Europeans have no

0:21:08.756 --> 0:21:11.356
<v Speaker 1>will of their own and there are not really independent

0:21:11.436 --> 0:21:15.796
<v Speaker 1>international actors. That Europe, for all practical purposes, is a

0:21:15.916 --> 0:21:20.076
<v Speaker 1>vestige of American foreign policy, even though Trump looks down

0:21:20.116 --> 0:21:24.236
<v Speaker 1>on Europe and likes to weaken Europe, but in reality

0:21:24.276 --> 0:21:28.556
<v Speaker 1>has also shown that Europeans really are not independent of

0:21:28.636 --> 0:21:31.636
<v Speaker 1>US foreign policy. Now, this has much broader implications. It's

0:21:31.636 --> 0:21:34.796
<v Speaker 1>not about Iran. If you're China, if you're Russia, if

0:21:34.796 --> 0:21:38.276
<v Speaker 1>you're any other country around the world sitting and watching this,

0:21:39.476 --> 0:21:42.476
<v Speaker 1>you basically come to the same conclusion that you know,

0:21:42.556 --> 0:21:46.356
<v Speaker 1>if there is an international deal that the Europeans step

0:21:46.436 --> 0:21:49.116
<v Speaker 1>in and say, well, you're we're the brokers, as a

0:21:49.156 --> 0:21:55.036
<v Speaker 1>big unit in international affairs, as protectors of rule of law, multilateralism.

0:21:55.196 --> 0:21:58.116
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put our name to this deal. It's meaningless.

0:21:59.036 --> 0:22:01.316
<v Speaker 1>And one of the outcomes of this entire thing is

0:22:01.796 --> 0:22:06.956
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has basically shredded European legitimacy and shown Europe

0:22:06.996 --> 0:22:09.956
<v Speaker 1>to be vassals of the United States. And that has

0:22:10.036 --> 0:22:13.796
<v Speaker 1>broad implications if you would, for the great power rivalry

0:22:13.836 --> 0:22:19.436
<v Speaker 1>that is likely to unfold going forward between Russia, China,

0:22:19.516 --> 0:22:22.436
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. And again, I think a folly

0:22:22.476 --> 0:22:27.276
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's foreign policy is that if that's really the case,

0:22:27.676 --> 0:22:31.196
<v Speaker 1>if it's really the big game of big power is

0:22:31.236 --> 0:22:35.236
<v Speaker 1>between you and China and Russia, it always would have

0:22:35.276 --> 0:22:38.116
<v Speaker 1>benefited the United States to have Europe as a foil,

0:22:38.196 --> 0:22:41.076
<v Speaker 1>as a fourth partner there that looks like, you know,

0:22:41.236 --> 0:22:43.796
<v Speaker 1>is an independent actor, and then you know, would benefit

0:22:43.876 --> 0:22:50.116
<v Speaker 1>the United States interests. By completely shredding Europe's credibility, Trump

0:22:50.116 --> 0:22:53.356
<v Speaker 1>has ended up i think, weekend in America's hand internationally

0:22:53.396 --> 0:22:57.356
<v Speaker 1>because the Europeans won't matter to the great power rivalry anymore. Well,

0:22:57.556 --> 0:22:59.316
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to also ask you about a really interesting

0:22:59.356 --> 0:23:02.036
<v Speaker 1>piece that you wrote where you argued in The Atlantic

0:23:02.556 --> 0:23:07.316
<v Speaker 1>that Trump's Iran policy is a gift to China. That's

0:23:07.356 --> 0:23:10.276
<v Speaker 1>not intuitive at all, and you make a pretty complex

0:23:10.476 --> 0:23:12.316
<v Speaker 1>and interesting argument. So I wonder if you would just

0:23:12.316 --> 0:23:15.636
<v Speaker 1>describe that argument. Well, you know, we we often when

0:23:15.636 --> 0:23:18.476
<v Speaker 1>we think about China and rivalry with China, we only

0:23:18.516 --> 0:23:23.116
<v Speaker 1>think about East Asia in the vestige of America's old

0:23:23.156 --> 0:23:26.116
<v Speaker 1>thinking that we think of China as a pacific power.

0:23:26.676 --> 0:23:31.836
<v Speaker 1>China is increasingly a continental power. Its interests are moving westwards.

0:23:32.596 --> 0:23:37.476
<v Speaker 1>It's even population and industries are moving westwards. And the

0:23:37.636 --> 0:23:41.036
<v Speaker 1>entire idea of the new sale crowd that Shishimping has

0:23:41.036 --> 0:23:43.276
<v Speaker 1>put on the table, or the Belt and Road as

0:23:43.276 --> 0:23:46.876
<v Speaker 1>it's more popularly known, is the one that would connect

0:23:47.036 --> 0:23:51.476
<v Speaker 1>Asia to Africa and then to Europe. I mean, the

0:23:51.556 --> 0:23:55.996
<v Speaker 1>Chinese have a conception of Eurasia, which is essentially from

0:23:56.516 --> 0:23:59.716
<v Speaker 1>eastern China all the way to Ireland, as being a

0:24:00.276 --> 0:24:03.156
<v Speaker 1>zone of influence, economic influence for the Chinese, and the

0:24:03.196 --> 0:24:06.596
<v Speaker 1>Middle East and Iran are big pieces in the middle

0:24:06.636 --> 0:24:09.476
<v Speaker 1>of this, and the Chinese have been pushing into the

0:24:09.516 --> 0:24:14.516
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, into Saudi Arabia, into UAE, into Pakistan, into Afghanistan,

0:24:14.716 --> 0:24:18.516
<v Speaker 1>and into Iran in a big way. And the United

0:24:18.596 --> 0:24:22.556
<v Speaker 1>States sort of conducts policy with Iran and the Middle

0:24:22.556 --> 0:24:24.916
<v Speaker 1>East as if we are still in the Bush era?

0:24:25.516 --> 0:24:29.356
<v Speaker 1>What is the United States is the only outside actor

0:24:29.476 --> 0:24:33.556
<v Speaker 1>that matters, and increasingly when it comes to diplomacy, nowadays,

0:24:33.636 --> 0:24:36.356
<v Speaker 1>Russians are the ones that matter. And when it comes

0:24:36.356 --> 0:24:40.996
<v Speaker 1>to economics, it's the Chinese that matter. And ultimately, if

0:24:41.236 --> 0:24:43.636
<v Speaker 1>the United States going to contain China, it would have

0:24:43.676 --> 0:24:48.196
<v Speaker 1>to contain it globally, not just with trade or in

0:24:47.596 --> 0:24:51.356
<v Speaker 1>the eastern part of China in the Pacific. It has

0:24:51.396 --> 0:24:54.516
<v Speaker 1>to think about how do you contain China's influenced in

0:24:54.556 --> 0:24:56.956
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, and how do you make sure that

0:24:57.076 --> 0:25:01.356
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese don't become or the Iranians don't become essentially

0:25:01.676 --> 0:25:05.556
<v Speaker 1>an extension of China's foreign policy and China's economic policy,

0:25:05.916 --> 0:25:09.876
<v Speaker 1>and isolation of Iran from the West essentially eventually turn

0:25:09.956 --> 0:25:13.036
<v Speaker 1>irund in the direction of China. The Chinese will end

0:25:13.116 --> 0:25:17.436
<v Speaker 1>up developing Iran's gas fields one now that total left,

0:25:17.476 --> 0:25:22.276
<v Speaker 1>they will end up developing Iran's infrastructure, Iran's oil fields.

0:25:22.316 --> 0:25:25.316
<v Speaker 1>And even now, the Chinese are perhaps the only ones

0:25:25.356 --> 0:25:29.036
<v Speaker 1>that are continuing to buy Irani aoid. You know, you're

0:25:29.036 --> 0:25:32.676
<v Speaker 1>making decisions about Iran without thinking about the broader ramifications

0:25:32.676 --> 0:25:36.276
<v Speaker 1>of what this means for the bigger fight against China.

0:25:36.356 --> 0:25:38.476
<v Speaker 1>And I think another thing that we're not paying attention

0:25:38.556 --> 0:25:42.996
<v Speaker 1>to is that as we're isolating Iran, the Russians are

0:25:43.116 --> 0:25:47.276
<v Speaker 1>deepening their strategic partnership with Iran. Yeah, and that means

0:25:47.316 --> 0:25:51.476
<v Speaker 1>that Iran and Russia in Syria have built a deep

0:25:51.556 --> 0:25:57.556
<v Speaker 1>state to deep state relationship, intelligence, security, military relationship. They

0:25:57.596 --> 0:26:01.476
<v Speaker 1>have successfully prosecuted a war jointly. We may think, oh,

0:26:01.516 --> 0:26:03.756
<v Speaker 1>they don't like each other, they don't agree their interests

0:26:03.756 --> 0:26:07.196
<v Speaker 1>are different. That is, looking at the glass as half

0:26:07.196 --> 0:26:09.876
<v Speaker 1>empty half full. Sight of it it is now you

0:26:09.956 --> 0:26:15.276
<v Speaker 1>have close to a decade of very successful military intelligence

0:26:15.316 --> 0:26:22.516
<v Speaker 1>cooperation that extends to now increasingly meetings between Revolutionary Guard

0:26:22.636 --> 0:26:28.556
<v Speaker 1>commanders and Russian FSB and military commanders, coordination of policy

0:26:28.596 --> 0:26:32.436
<v Speaker 1>on Afghanistan, for instance, between Iran and Russia, coordination of

0:26:32.516 --> 0:26:37.236
<v Speaker 1>policy on Syria. And Iran, because it no longer has

0:26:37.356 --> 0:26:41.196
<v Speaker 1>absolutely any relationship with the United States, it's kind of

0:26:41.556 --> 0:26:45.876
<v Speaker 1>a potential future base for Russia. I mean, you could

0:26:45.876 --> 0:26:48.316
<v Speaker 1>see the Russians may think that ten years from now

0:26:48.636 --> 0:26:51.996
<v Speaker 1>they may be selling Iran advanced military aircraft s, four

0:26:52.076 --> 0:26:55.396
<v Speaker 1>hundred missiles of the kind that's just sold Turkey. They

0:26:55.436 --> 0:26:59.156
<v Speaker 1>may get basis in Iran. And the United States is

0:26:59.156 --> 0:27:04.116
<v Speaker 1>not only handing over Iran to China economically and weakening

0:27:04.676 --> 0:27:07.876
<v Speaker 1>China's competitors in Asia by cutting them out of Iran,

0:27:08.236 --> 0:27:11.476
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually ending Iran over to Russia as well.

0:27:11.996 --> 0:27:15.436
<v Speaker 1>And so the Russians don't want war, but the Russians

0:27:15.436 --> 0:27:18.196
<v Speaker 1>are very happy to see Iran alienated from the West

0:27:18.196 --> 0:27:20.276
<v Speaker 1>because in the future the only place Iran will have

0:27:20.356 --> 0:27:23.636
<v Speaker 1>to go will be to Russia. Well, I think that's

0:27:23.676 --> 0:27:26.356
<v Speaker 1>a good summary really of your analysis, Valley. I mean

0:27:26.876 --> 0:27:33.316
<v Speaker 1>Trump's approached generally by isolating and alienating Iran first, gives

0:27:33.316 --> 0:27:36.556
<v Speaker 1>Iranians an incentive to up the ante and look to war,

0:27:36.996 --> 0:27:39.756
<v Speaker 1>and that might involve a situation where we actually get

0:27:39.756 --> 0:27:42.956
<v Speaker 1>into a war with Iran. As a fallback to that,

0:27:43.316 --> 0:27:48.636
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing Iran into China's arms economically and into Russia's

0:27:48.716 --> 0:27:52.356
<v Speaker 1>arms militarily. If there's a more thoroughgoing condemnation of a

0:27:52.396 --> 0:27:55.716
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy than that, I can't really imagine it. So

0:27:56.356 --> 0:27:59.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm very grateful to you for that very penetrating and

0:27:59.716 --> 0:28:02.316
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful analysis. I think it's a wake up call to

0:28:02.436 --> 0:28:06.916
<v Speaker 1>think about how this relationship is developing. And if Trump

0:28:07.036 --> 0:28:09.036
<v Speaker 1>is reelected, it seems as though there's a high problem

0:28:09.356 --> 0:28:11.436
<v Speaker 1>that that's the direction which which things will go. I

0:28:11.436 --> 0:28:14.076
<v Speaker 1>think it's hard to see a likely mid course correction

0:28:14.116 --> 0:28:16.476
<v Speaker 1>from Trump on those things. So here, again, as on

0:28:16.556 --> 0:28:19.996
<v Speaker 1>many other issues, so much depends on what happens in

0:28:19.996 --> 0:28:23.436
<v Speaker 1>our next election exactly. Let's hope for the best. Let's

0:28:23.476 --> 0:28:25.596
<v Speaker 1>hope for the best. Thank you so much for I

0:28:25.636 --> 0:28:28.236
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate your time and your insight. Thank you as

0:28:28.276 --> 0:28:45.516
<v Speaker 1>good being with you since I talked to Valinasser. John

0:28:45.556 --> 0:28:49.236
<v Speaker 1>Bolton has actually left his post as National Security Advisor,

0:28:49.956 --> 0:28:53.276
<v Speaker 1>which leads me to our Sound of the Week. Bolton

0:28:53.436 --> 0:28:55.996
<v Speaker 1>was on the guidance to be here, so we're YouTube

0:28:56.116 --> 0:28:59.916
<v Speaker 1>blindsided by what occurred today that he's no longer with

0:29:00.036 --> 0:29:02.756
<v Speaker 1>the administration. Was it news to you today because last

0:29:02.836 --> 0:29:08.156
<v Speaker 1>night you were. I'm never surprised that Secretary of State

0:29:08.236 --> 0:29:11.236
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pompeo not a close friend of the outgoing National

0:29:11.316 --> 0:29:14.916
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor, answering questions from reporters at a press conference

0:29:14.916 --> 0:29:18.716
<v Speaker 1>he held with Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchen on Tuesday, right

0:29:18.796 --> 0:29:22.276
<v Speaker 1>after John Bulton's departure was made public. Now it is

0:29:22.396 --> 0:29:25.236
<v Speaker 1>unclear whether Bolton resigned or was fired. It depends on

0:29:25.316 --> 0:29:28.676
<v Speaker 1>who you believe. Trump tweeted that he had fired Bolton.

0:29:28.956 --> 0:29:33.756
<v Speaker 1>Bolton tweeted that he had offered his resignation voluntarily either way,

0:29:34.036 --> 0:29:37.276
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, who really cares. Here are my thoughts on

0:29:37.316 --> 0:29:40.916
<v Speaker 1>what the departure means for US foreign policy at large.

0:29:42.076 --> 0:29:44.956
<v Speaker 1>The hiring of John Bolton was, from the beginning a

0:29:45.076 --> 0:29:48.836
<v Speaker 1>very strange thing for Donald Trump to have done. Donald

0:29:48.836 --> 0:29:52.156
<v Speaker 1>Trump did not run as a neo conservative, the kind

0:29:52.196 --> 0:29:55.356
<v Speaker 1>of politician who thinks the United States should promote global

0:29:55.436 --> 0:30:00.076
<v Speaker 1>interests in democracy and human rights by force if necessary. Instead,

0:30:00.196 --> 0:30:02.916
<v Speaker 1>he ran as a kind of isolationist and as someone

0:30:02.916 --> 0:30:05.876
<v Speaker 1>who said that he liked to do deals economically, not

0:30:05.956 --> 0:30:09.956
<v Speaker 1>to fight wars. Indeed, since becoming president, Donald Trump has

0:30:09.956 --> 0:30:15.116
<v Speaker 1>been notably cautious about using force in almost any place

0:30:15.316 --> 0:30:19.236
<v Speaker 1>around the globe, including under circumstances when most prior presidents,

0:30:19.316 --> 0:30:23.716
<v Speaker 1>Republican and Democratic alike, probably would have at least fired

0:30:23.756 --> 0:30:28.276
<v Speaker 1>off some missiles. So it was very, very surprising when

0:30:28.276 --> 0:30:31.556
<v Speaker 1>he hired in John Bolton, a national security advisor who

0:30:31.636 --> 0:30:35.236
<v Speaker 1>was well known within the George W. Bush administration, not

0:30:35.316 --> 0:30:37.956
<v Speaker 1>to mention the earlier administrations he worked for as being

0:30:38.276 --> 0:30:41.916
<v Speaker 1>the most pro intervention, the most shoot him up, the

0:30:41.956 --> 0:30:47.396
<v Speaker 1>most aggressive guy in the entire administration. Sure, Trump had

0:30:47.436 --> 0:30:50.436
<v Speaker 1>heard Bolton talking tough on Fox News, but the kind

0:30:50.476 --> 0:30:52.876
<v Speaker 1>of tough talking that Bolton was doing was not an

0:30:52.876 --> 0:30:55.836
<v Speaker 1>obvious fit for the policies that Trump was trying to adopt.

0:30:56.756 --> 0:31:00.636
<v Speaker 1>The consequence of having a national security advisor whose policy

0:31:00.636 --> 0:31:04.316
<v Speaker 1>approach was so different from the presidents was not what

0:31:04.476 --> 0:31:08.596
<v Speaker 1>you might imagine for meeting dars Kern's Goodwin's team of rivals.

0:31:09.196 --> 0:31:12.036
<v Speaker 1>This was not Donald Trump as Abraham Lincoln, trying to

0:31:12.076 --> 0:31:15.396
<v Speaker 1>balance the impulses that he himself might have against different

0:31:15.436 --> 0:31:19.116
<v Speaker 1>impulses of thoughtful members of his advisory group, so that

0:31:19.156 --> 0:31:22.076
<v Speaker 1>they would balance each other. Hear different opinions and read

0:31:22.156 --> 0:31:25.876
<v Speaker 1>some moderate middle To the contrary, Trump just continued to

0:31:25.956 --> 0:31:29.236
<v Speaker 1>run foreign policy his own way, while Bolton made every

0:31:29.276 --> 0:31:33.636
<v Speaker 1>effort to rein him in. The President would meet with

0:31:33.716 --> 0:31:37.396
<v Speaker 1>the president of North Korea, and John Bolton would try

0:31:37.396 --> 0:31:40.396
<v Speaker 1>to undercut the meeting. At one moment. In order for

0:31:40.396 --> 0:31:43.436
<v Speaker 1>Trump to actually cross into North Korea, Bolton had to

0:31:43.476 --> 0:31:46.236
<v Speaker 1>be sent off on a mission to Mongolia. I mean,

0:31:46.236 --> 0:31:49.396
<v Speaker 1>you can't make this stuff up. The effect of this,

0:31:49.796 --> 0:31:52.436
<v Speaker 1>and you heard this in my conversation with Bali, is

0:31:52.436 --> 0:31:54.836
<v Speaker 1>that countries around the world are trying to figure out

0:31:55.116 --> 0:31:57.916
<v Speaker 1>what is the policy of the United States under circumstances

0:31:57.956 --> 0:32:00.556
<v Speaker 1>when the President and the National Security Advisor are aiming

0:32:00.596 --> 0:32:05.676
<v Speaker 1>in what appeared to be almost exactly opposite directions. A

0:32:05.836 --> 0:32:09.036
<v Speaker 1>president who no longer is burdened by a national secure

0:32:09.276 --> 0:32:13.796
<v Speaker 1>advisor who is contradicting him would ordinarily be a good thing.

0:32:14.356 --> 0:32:16.836
<v Speaker 1>It would ordinarily mean that the president would not have

0:32:16.876 --> 0:32:20.036
<v Speaker 1>to spend his time arguing with his chief foreign policy adviser.

0:32:20.436 --> 0:32:23.556
<v Speaker 1>It would also ordinarily mean that other countries trying to

0:32:23.596 --> 0:32:26.276
<v Speaker 1>suss out what US policy is would not have to

0:32:26.276 --> 0:32:30.756
<v Speaker 1>spend their time on the palace intrigue of conflict and contradiction.

0:32:31.716 --> 0:32:35.316
<v Speaker 1>The question is, when the president is Donald Trump, does

0:32:35.396 --> 0:32:38.036
<v Speaker 1>greater clarity of his foreign policy make us think the

0:32:38.116 --> 0:32:40.916
<v Speaker 1>United States will be better off than it was otherwise.

0:32:41.876 --> 0:32:44.196
<v Speaker 1>To be sure, I am not saying that it would

0:32:44.196 --> 0:32:46.356
<v Speaker 1>have been better if John Bolton had gotten his way.

0:32:46.796 --> 0:32:50.356
<v Speaker 1>His aggressive policies have a reasonable probability of getting the

0:32:50.436 --> 0:32:54.156
<v Speaker 1>United States into violent confrontations that it frankly does not need,

0:32:54.196 --> 0:32:56.956
<v Speaker 1>at least not in my view. So it's not really

0:32:56.956 --> 0:33:00.036
<v Speaker 1>a question of whether Bolton's policies would have been better

0:33:00.076 --> 0:33:03.116
<v Speaker 1>than Trump's in every instance. Rather, it's a question of

0:33:03.116 --> 0:33:06.036
<v Speaker 1>whether Trump is a better president and I use those

0:33:06.076 --> 0:33:09.596
<v Speaker 1>words in scare quotes when he's being constrained and limited

0:33:09.716 --> 0:33:12.716
<v Speaker 1>by anyone who disagrees with him, then he is. When

0:33:12.716 --> 0:33:16.996
<v Speaker 1>he's following his own impulses, whatever those may be. My

0:33:17.076 --> 0:33:20.316
<v Speaker 1>own view is that despite the enormous costs of having

0:33:20.356 --> 0:33:23.236
<v Speaker 1>a national security advisor and a president whose views were

0:33:23.236 --> 0:33:27.556
<v Speaker 1>so fundamentally opposed, there was an accidental side benefit. And

0:33:27.596 --> 0:33:30.476
<v Speaker 1>the accidental side benefit was that a president whose national

0:33:30.476 --> 0:33:34.036
<v Speaker 1>security advisor disagree with him couldn't do much of anything.

0:33:34.476 --> 0:33:36.916
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to Donald Trump and foreign policy,

0:33:37.716 --> 0:33:40.436
<v Speaker 1>the best outcome with the world can hope for, the

0:33:40.436 --> 0:33:42.596
<v Speaker 1>best outcome the United States can hope for is that

0:33:42.636 --> 0:33:46.236
<v Speaker 1>we do no harm. The less the president can do,

0:33:46.676 --> 0:33:49.796
<v Speaker 1>the fewer agreements he can reach, the fewer wars he

0:33:49.836 --> 0:33:53.196
<v Speaker 1>can enter. The less the president can do, the safer

0:33:53.436 --> 0:33:56.436
<v Speaker 1>we all are. And I don't mean just we Americans,

0:33:56.596 --> 0:33:59.996
<v Speaker 1>I mean we people who live in the world. So

0:34:00.116 --> 0:34:01.876
<v Speaker 1>when I say that it's a bit of a sad

0:34:01.916 --> 0:34:04.436
<v Speaker 1>thing that John Bolton is no longer the National Security Advisor,

0:34:04.756 --> 0:34:07.116
<v Speaker 1>believe me, I'm not saying a single good thing about

0:34:07.196 --> 0:34:10.436
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton. What I'm saying is that if Trump were

0:34:10.596 --> 0:34:14.876
<v Speaker 1>to manage his own foreign policy unconstrained and unlimited, the

0:34:15.116 --> 0:34:21.436
<v Speaker 1>random walk of his impulses and approaches could potentially endanger everybody.

0:34:21.796 --> 0:34:24.436
<v Speaker 1>Departure of John Bolton is not the kind of event

0:34:24.716 --> 0:34:27.116
<v Speaker 1>that makes you weep or cry for the man who's

0:34:27.156 --> 0:34:29.956
<v Speaker 1>left his job. On the other hand, it does make

0:34:30.036 --> 0:34:32.556
<v Speaker 1>me just a little bit more nervous for what's going

0:34:32.596 --> 0:34:38.916
<v Speaker 1>on with foreign policy in the United States. Deep Background

0:34:38.996 --> 0:34:41.596
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is

0:34:41.676 --> 0:34:45.596
<v Speaker 1>Lydia Geancott, with engineering by Jason Gambrell and Jason Rostkowski.

0:34:45.876 --> 0:34:48.956
<v Speaker 1>Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme music is composed

0:34:48.996 --> 0:34:52.836
<v Speaker 1>by Luis GERA special thanks to the Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell,

0:34:52.996 --> 0:34:56.156
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Loebell. I'm Noah Feldman. You can

0:34:56.196 --> 0:34:59.316
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. This is

0:34:59.396 --> 0:35:00.196
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background.