WEBVTT - TikTok's Problematic "Challenges"

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in silicon vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Jack in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg technology. Coming up in the next hour. TIKTOK

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is under fire over a challenge that involves cooking chicken

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with NAI quill. N Have the details on the stunt

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that led to a warning from the F D A.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Will slayer hippo is looking for the next big thing

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>after closing two million dollars in new funding. I'll talk

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to Eric Hippo about their next move. And first on Bloomberg,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>outgoing CEO, crack of crack, and Jesse Powell talks about

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>why he is stepping down. Also, we'll ask what you

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>thinks about JP morgans. You, Jamie diamond, calling crypto tokens

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>decentralized ponzi schemes. Turning to the two big stories regarding Tiktok,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the F D A has issued a warning that a

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>new tiktok challenge could be dangerous, the so called sleepy

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>chicken challenges, when people cook their chicken in Ni Quill. Meantime,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>TIKTOK will ban fundraising and all other money making opportunities

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for politicians and government accounts on the platform here to

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>discuss Bloomberg's Alex barrinkle. Let's start with the challenge. How

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>big did this one have to get for the F

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.639
<v Speaker 1>D A to weigh in? It got big enough for

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>parents and folks to complain, which is typically what happens

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with these companies. Um, the social platforms will play a

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of whack a mole Um searching down these challenges,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>these fads. We saw it with a really dangerous tide

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pod challenge of a few years ago on some of

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the other social platforms. But this one, emily, Um, the

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sleepy chicken challenge, it does seem like tiktok snuff this

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>one out. If you search for that term right now

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the APP, it sends you to a warning basically

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about dangerous challenges and dangerous fads. I will say there

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of kind of Um, scary type challenges,

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>weird information that POPs up on the platforms that doesn't

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>always get folks like the FDA to get involved. So

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>clearly this was one that they felt like they needed

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to jump in on. And Emily, I will say you

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>search for sleepy chicken. Those posts have been taken down.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You search for some names that are misspelled or you

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>had a few letters in there and those words are

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>still up, which I just think illustrates the challenge these

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>platforms have when it comes to locking down a misinformation

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like this. Yeah, we found some of them but decided

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not to show them to our viewers for obvious reasons.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Um and and perhaps even bigger news, this decision on

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>politicians and governments and not allowing them to make money

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. Can you explain how this works? Sure,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of course. TIKTOK came out today basically with a pretty

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>significant expansion of its ban on political ads political content

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the U S midterms. In in the past, historically,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Tiktok has banned political advertisements from governments, from politicians. Now

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's taking that a step further and saying these individuals

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>also cannot fund raise. So there is no soliciting of

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>campaign donations, there's no asking for money if you're a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>politician or you're a government or government entity. They also

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are banning these accounts from accessing any of the money

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>making tools on the platform. That can be things like

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>tipping from users or gifting or things like the Creator Fund,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a fund Um that pays out users with

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of followers for the number of views and

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>engagements they get on the APP. So you've heard this

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>argument before, Emily from TIKTOK. You heard Tiktok CEO in

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>front of a Senate panel make this argument last week.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Tiktok likes to attest that they are an entertainment platform,

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not a place for politics. Some of these Um

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>prohibitions and moderating of the of this type of content

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of backs that up. Um, but it is a

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>very notable kind of piece of News, particularly in this

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>election season and as we start to get fired up

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about the next presidential election, which will come closely on

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the heels of the mid terms this year and quickly.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>How does this compared to what Meta, instagram, you know, twitter,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>have done in terms of their stance on politicians making money?

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so. TIKTOK and twitter both have completely banned political ads.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So there is no kind of money making there. On

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>metas platform, facebook and Instagram, those ads are still able

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to be up there. I've still seen content on those

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>platforms soliciting donations. So it does seem like Tiktok is

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>taking a step further than some of its big tech peers. Um.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as this evolves in social media platforms

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>tend to exchange ideas. It will be a place that

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll certainly be watching them more closely, particularly if there's

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>any kind of duff steps with facebook or instagram in

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>this election season. All right, Bloomberg's Alex Barenka. Thank you

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>very much, Claire. Hippo, one of New York's top venture

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>capital firms, just announced plans to invest two thirty million

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars across a couple of fun that seed at earlier stages.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Ben Lair is also back as a full time investor.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He Co founded the firm before becoming the CEO of

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>group nine media, which sold to Fox media. Joining me out,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Eric Hippo, managing partner at Lara Hippo. Eric, great to

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. Curious with the fundraising environment

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was like for these two funds, given a very challenging

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomic backdrop. Yes, hi, emily, good to be with you.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The majority of these new funds were in fact ways

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh and uh, and you know we have

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this is our twelfth year. Were these our fund aid

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and select force or early stage on late stage number eight,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>late stage number four. So we we we've done quite

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>well and we have very loyal lps. We've we've been

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>able to capture some new LPS as well. So it

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been really it's it's it hasn't been exceptionally hard. Um,

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that today for new funds it would

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be pretty difficult. So how is the changing macro environment

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>changing your strategy and where you're going to place your bats?

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So we, we have are quite well known for our

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer companies, companies like what we parker and Casper and

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all birds and glassier and many others, Um and, but

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in the in the more recent years, we've also been very,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>very focused on B two B, on enterprise software. We're

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>less known for that, but we do over half of

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>our investments in those areas and those are at the

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>moment very exciting and we're looking forward to kind of

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>balancing our humor business with our with our B Two

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>B business. Now venture capitalists are announcing big funds left

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and right, but it seems like there's not a lot

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of places to put this money. I mean, is there

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of dry powder sitting on the sidelines. That's,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, piling up. You know, while valuations come down

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and the economy resets, there is, there is a record

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of dry powder. As you say. What we're finding

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is that funding at the seed and Prese level, which

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is our specialty, uh, you know, continues and the normal,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>normal pace series a as well, is Um. You know,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>our companies are getting funded at the series there, but

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>where things are much slower is in the later stages,

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>series B and beyond, and that's going to do with

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that late stage investors, Um, are really not

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sure about how the price, how the value companies. But

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as soon as the market kind of settles in the

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>later stage, they be plenty of money to be put

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to work. So are you waiting for valuations to come down?

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that sort of what I hear you're saying? In

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in where we invest at the seed valuations have moderated.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They haven't yet come down to uh, kind of three levels.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we we take the very long view, uh,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we invest in a good year and a

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bad year. You know our companies are going to start

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>maturing years down the road. Um. So we um, you know,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we we we find valuations to be more attractive to them,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But more importantly, we have more time to

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>do our work. There isn't a frenzy than existed last

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>year where people wanted to close their rounds in a

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of days. Now we're back at being able to,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, close around in a matter of weeks, giving

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>US plenty of time to do our work and our

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>due diligence. So what's your take on you know, I

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>mean another reading from the Fed? Great like seemed to

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be continuing. How is that impacting your outlook? The biggest

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>impact for, you know, venture capital at the moment it

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the fact that that the I

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>P O market is is dead in the water Um,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>and so companies that wanted to go public this year

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>are postponing that particular event, and that always has an

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>effect on the M and a market as well. If

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if the I P O market is slow, the M

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and a market is slow as well. So, uh, you know,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>last year we saw a record amount of liquidity. We

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>returned an absolute record of uh back to our limited partners.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>This year is much slower, but again, we take the

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>long view. You'll have a down year, you'll have an

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>up here it over a period of time. Uh, it

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter. Hi, uh, Eric Capo of Laro Harpo.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Always going to have you here, Eric. Thank you all right.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, crack and see you. Jesse Powell stepping down.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for the future of the CRYPTO exchange?

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Our conversation with him coming up next. This is Bloomberg.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick check of the markets again. I want

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring back our Ed Ludlow, who's been watching a

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>few more things. And what else is catching your iron? Yeah,

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was just so much that happened on

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday afternoon. As a reminder, the Fed did raise rates

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>by seventy five basis points, and the Hawk isher prize

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was where rates go from here. Officials saw four point

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>three percent by the end of four point six PC,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>terminal rate going into three or in. And behind me

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>US some kind of the corners of the technology market.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Right was the mega caps and some of the U

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>S shares of Chinese list of tech companies that fell

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the most all told. Look at the NYC Fan Class Index,

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>down two point six percent. And then we talked about

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>why do we keep going on about interest rates and

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>why every day do I stand in front of you

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and say rates are projected to do this, because higher

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>rates discount the present value of future profits. For a

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of these tech companies, including the mean stocks, including

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofitable sector corners of the tech market, they haven't

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>got any profit anyway. They're trading at very high multiple.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So that was an area of the market that we

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>look to. A really interesting part of the market as well.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday was aerospace and defense. You heard President Putin of

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Russia talking about mobilizing troops and talk about an excitation

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of certain parts of Ukraine. Of course that war ongoing.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>At first defensive in aerospace stocks have been much, much higher,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but actually post fed paired their gains to be to

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a decline of nine percent. Some breaking headlines crossing the

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal in the last few minutes from salesforce, one

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the companies you and I do discuss more often

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>m which is up now three in after hours, the

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>company saying it has a four year revenue target of

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars. Why does that matter? Well, to give

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you some context, in four year twenty one salesforce had

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue of around thirty five billion dollars. So it's part

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of their invested day presentation in the Bay area in

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and Wednesday they've been telling investors kind of

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what their longer term expectations are, and that expectation is

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to boost revenue, revenue on a four year basis in

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a very meaningful way, to have fifty billion dollars of

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sales by four year, twenty six, and I know over

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the coming days and weeks we'll keep a close eye

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on that stock end absolutely. I'm actually interviewing salesforce coast

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>at your Mark Benny off tomorrow at Dream Force. We're

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get his thoughts on the market moves and

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>his broader outlook. I'm also curious what he thinks about

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the big FIGMA deal, Adoba buying Figma for twenty billion

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the middle of a downturn, and it'll be

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting to get his thoughts, given salesforce butts black for

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven billion dollars, which I believe was the biggest

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>tech deal ever at the time. Um and and and

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and certainly will be interesting to get his thoughts as

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed continues to make these decisions. Yeah, well, he's

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not a guy that's short of opinions. Mzy I mean,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, he's got an opinion and everything, but

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he's no stranger to M and a either. Not just

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that deal that you mentioned, but I think that's a

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>mule soft right. And actually salesforce gone a little bit

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>quiet in recent weeks and months. You and I used

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to cover them quite a lot pre pandemic period and

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>entering the during the pandemic period, because this is obviously

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a company that has decent sales, but also it's a

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>really high margin business and at the same time, Benioff

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is a man of many passion projects and I'm sure

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you'll discuss those of him too. Absolutely it's going to

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>be a great one coming up on Thursday show Ed.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Meantime, as climate week is in full swing

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York, California Governor Gavin newsom spoke about the

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>state's climate challenges and how to avoid blackouts like those

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it in past years here in the state.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>He spoke with my colleague David Weston from the sidelines

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of United Nations climate action, race to zero and the

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>resilience form supported by Bloomberg Phil anthropies. Take a listen.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>We were distress tests in the most extreme had no blackouts.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We were challenged, but we kept our wits and we're

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>keeping our agenda and we're maintaining our policy principles. That,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, will allow us more resilience in the future.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So No, I don't think you have to sacrifice one

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for the other. I would argue not. Transitioning is the

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger risk in the bigger soccer. Transition is an important

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>word in that sentence. It's not all of one or

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>all the others, because a lot of experts sake. Yes,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly we have to get to renewables, but you can't

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just give up, for example, on natural gas that that

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually part of the path for the transition. You

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with that? Under percentage bact we were

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>able to keep the lights on because we kept a

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of our ones through cooling plants online. We were

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>able to do backup generators. We are not naive about

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the situational challenges, but that doesn't mean we' and accelerate.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. In areas like battery stories,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we have the largest installed battery projects on planet Earth.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It was two fifty megawats. Two and a half years ago,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>close to four thousand megawats. Say It's our largest power

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>plant today. That's just in two and a half years.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Look at what we can do in five, ten, fifteen years.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are naively assuming we're not capable

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of doing so much more with the Innovation and entrepreneur

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>spirit that finds the best of this country. Enormous growth

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in your battery capacity. You said where you could go.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Where do you need to go in order to get

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to zero emissions? I mean, look, we have very ambitious

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>goals to carbon neutrality, not in at zero. Carbon neutrality

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is five. We've established interim goals of clean energy on

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our electricity grid by five and of course we have

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the ZV man date, which is the most aggressive of

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>any jurisdiction, certainly in the United States one of the

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>few in the world. So we have to do multiple

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it is probably six gigawatts a year uh to move

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>things along. And here's how we do it. It's not

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just putting unprecedented money to back up these technologies and

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>tax and centers, which we have. That the four billion

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars of new incremental investments, setting the most aggressive policies

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to get the private sector to invest and fill the gaps,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but also the biggest issue that we face. It's time

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two project deliver, not just from a supply chain perspective,

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but permitting perspective. The NIMBIISM huge issue, and so we

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>did something profound this year. We have completely knocked out

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>all of those barriers and we put in rigid timelines

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to get projects permitted and go through a judicial process

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at their challenge, and that, we think, is a game changer.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Anything I read about this says carbon capture is critical,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's an important part of your strategy.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, how we're really taking carbon capture

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to scale, to the sale? You needed to be particularly

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the air. Not yet. We have direct our

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>capture a number of companies in California. In fact, they're

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating that in Wyoming as we speak. We worked with

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the oil industry. You never believe that, since I just

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to referendum against our efforts on our setbacks, health and

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>safety setbacks. But now carbon capture, sequestration. We want to

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>invest in that and, by the way, that's an important

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>point you're making. We were able to find some balance

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in that space a few years ago our mental justice community.

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Others were like no, we don't want to have that conversation.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Green hydrogen didn't even want that conversation. So we've been

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>accelerating on all fronts. Recognize that we need a d

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>risk including, by the way, extending the life of our

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear plant for five years in order to stress test

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this grid as we transition, and D risk and look

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at the issue cost, which is profoundly important. California Governor

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom there with Bloomberg David Weston some other stories

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we're watching, India is wooing chip makers to the country.

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Under a new ten billion dollar plan, the government will

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>increase financial incentives for manufacturers upwards of a project's total cost.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>India is the world's second biggest fobal phonemaker, and one

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>music is tapping a youtube veteran to head the world's

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>third largest record label. Robert Kinkel will become co CEO

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in January and soul CEO in February. Kinkel has spent

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of his career at Youtube, where he led

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>creative and commercial partnerships and helped launch a subscription service.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>He was also part of the team and Netflix that

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>introduced original streaming programming and beyond. Meat has suspended Chief

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Operating Officer Doug Ramsey. He was arrested on charges that

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>he bit a man's nose during a fight after a

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>college football game in Arkansas. This is another blow for

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the plant based Protein Company, which cut its revenue forecast

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>last month. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and Emily Chang

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. When it comes to the digital revolution,

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Latin America is catching up fast. The venture capital firm Atlantic,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which backs pre scale in American companies, just published a

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>report showing how the digital economy in that part of

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the world has skyrocketed as a result of the pandemic.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's dive deeper into all of this with Atlantico Venture

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Partner Hugo Bara. He was also vice president of product

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for Android at Google, worked at chaw me at facebook

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hugo, you've worn so many hats Um, so

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your perspective is really valuable. What are some key highlights

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that you learned from this report about the Latin American

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Digital Economy? I'm curious what surprised you, hiamily, nice to

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>see you. There's definitely a lot to unpack in this

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Um report that we just published yesterday. Probably the key story,

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the big headline, which sort of underlying investing, is that

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic tech boom has been sticky in Latin America.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge deal because in the US we

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>saw a bit of a reversal of the historical trend Um,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, or back to the historical trend in in tech,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>or as in Latin American particularly Brazil, we've we seem

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to have sort of jumped ahead of Brazil. E commerce,

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for instance, is three years sort of ahead of the plan.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 1>You know that that sort of growth curve has shifted

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>up three years Um and that obviously has driven a

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of activity and acceleration in tech there. And

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>there are some some pretty interesting and borderline absurdum stats

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that I think are worth talking about. So one of them,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of part of the the e commerce branch,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is is grocery delivery. So groceries delivery

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in Um in Brazil, as sort of measured by I food,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the largest player locally, saw a six times jump,

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like right at the beginning of the pandemic, uh, and

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>then since that it's grown an extra ten times. Right,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>so sixty times jump between the beginning of the pandemic

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and now, and that's basically a sustained sort of new level.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Another big one is telemedicine, which is obviously pretty understandable,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>but virtual appointments in Brazil is measured by one of

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the League players, a company called connects, the salvaging uh

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ten next in the first year of the pandemic and

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>then doubled since that. Right, so it's like a twenty

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>x jump from from the beginning of times, and these

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are sustained new levels, which is really exciting interesting. You know,

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how this is influencing where you and Atlantico

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>are placing your bets, because you're learning about these new trends.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>At the same time we're going into a massive macroeconomic

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>downturn and I wonder how that's uniquely impacting Latin America. Yeah,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think a few things are shifting and I

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>would probably look at the venture investing scene Um specifically.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know without a doubt investment has gone down

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as compared to what happened in and UH in Um

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as a result of sort of this new economic reality Um,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so investments slowed down. In Latin America in particular, we've

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>noticed that foreign investors. They remained active in the region,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're pulling back a little. But what's happened is

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that the local funds are sort of making up the difference, right,

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is directly in response to this sort of

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lasting tech boom, post pandemic. It's sort of the excitement remains,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will. So valuations have gone down, Um, but investments,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly in an earlier stage companies, uh, you know, continues.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a few other unique things happening that I think

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue to do the fuel investment in

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>a big way. You know, Fintech and left Ham is

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>extremely well developed, I would argue, in some ways much

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>more than in North America. Uh. There's a couple of

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>examples worth mentioning, you know. First off, we saw, you know,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the most successful Fintech come needs, the largest

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>neo bank in the world, new bank, go public recently. Uh. That's,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, a world class story. And there's another stat

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that I think also relates to to the investment climate,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what's happening with mobile payments in Brazil. Uh,

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and and it's IT'S A it's a skyrocketing example. So

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the central bank launched, launched these sort of new instant

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>payment rails a couple of years ago. It's called picks, uh,

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and picks is in some ways very similar to U

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>P I in India, which everybody talks about. But what

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>happened in Brazil that was interesting and different is picks

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>got to a billion transactions per month in just under

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>a year, which was the quarter of the time it

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>took up I to get to that same billion a month.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>You know transaction level in China, forgive me. In India

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to have six times the population of Brazil. Right.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 1>So that changes consumer habits. It makes it a lot

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>easier for e commerce and you know, an offline to online,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>online to offline sort of patterns to play out. So

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that has affected the rate at which uh, that the

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fintech sector is growing, and it also affects investing in

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Fintech specifically. You know, given that you've worked at so

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>many big tech companies and you were more recently the

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>head of virtual reality, uh facebook, now Meta. You know,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this big shift in the public markets. Um

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Investors seem to be really skeptical, skeptical about this whole

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>metaverse thing. FACEBOOK's market cap is now one six of apples,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's a very different story when you

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>worked there. Do you think this whole metaverse pivot was

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the right call for Mark Zuckerberg? It's a obviously hugely

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>important question and I am biased because I do believe

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that virtual and augmented reality are really uh, in the

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>future as sort of the next major competing paradigm. Um.

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was the right call. I think

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the rate of investment, Um, you know, is, I think,

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>where we could spend some time debating. You know, should

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it have been half of the investment level, for example,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that it's been so far? Um. But but I have

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>no doubt because kind of history has has kept us Um,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, objective here that we as a society are

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go through a competing paradigm shift in the next,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten to fifteen years Um, and the companies

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that have made the early investments, uh, you know, in

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in in the platforms, in some of the core technologies,

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the ones, you know, that have,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the winning horses in the next major

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>platform race. And and the thing about Meta is that Meta, uh,

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, is starting from much further behind than, you know,

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Google or apple, because they don't have sort of an

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>operating system of major platform investment in the current competing paradigm,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which is mobile and sort of the smartphone economy. Um.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So it does require, to a reasonable degree, a disproportional

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of investment. Like I said, I think that you

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>can the rate of investment, but I think, Um, you know,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Strategically Thinking Twenty Years Forwards, Um, I think this will

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have been the right call. And you know what brought.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You've worked in so many different markets. You know, China, India,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know. Now your focus is on Latin America and

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, of course, Um, you were closer to lot

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in America earlier in your career. You know, there's a

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of concern about the global economy. There's a lot

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of concerns about the smartphone market in particular. There's a

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>new iphone out. Do you think people are going to

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>upgrade right now, when you're paying so much more for

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>literally everything from gas to groceries? Are you concerned about

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the health of the smartphone market? Um, I am, and

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I have been for a couple of years, because I

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>think the industry has sort of rent out of things

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to to to do. You know, have sort of run

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>out of innovation space, Um, and I'm I'm sort of

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>dying for uh, you know, Google and apple to jump

0:26:55.760 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>on the folding, you know folding phone bandwagon, because I think, Um,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that sort of unlocks potential with a new form factor. Um.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's an interesting, pretty high risk that

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see stagnation, as you've said, in terms

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of upgrades for the next couple of years until we

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>see the next major wave of innovation. So, yes, concerned

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and watching it closely. All right, appreciate it, Um, and

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you for bringing us those new numbers from Latin America,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic partner and also the CEO of detect, Hugo Barra.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you back. All right. Coming up the

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 1>TESTOS CO founder on the ethereum merge and what it

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>means for her blockchain, which is about to get an

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>upgrade of its own. This is Bloomberg. In the coming

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks there will be another big upgrade for or blockchain.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The test as protocol approve of state network, widely considered

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a direct competitor of the Theorem, will undergo its eleventh upgrade.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now Kathleen Brightman, Co founder of Teso. So

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen how will your upgrade be different from the ethereum merge?

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh Um. Well, fundamentally, test this is a cryptocurrency that

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>as a formal mechanism, um, for proposing and ratifying upgrades

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the protocol, meaning Um upgrades happen seamlessly and without the

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>use of a hard fork, which is, you know, why

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the etherory merge took so long. It was basically like,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in their own words, hurting cats, um with TESSOS. The

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>reason it's been able to upgrade ten times, largely seamlessly, Um,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is because basically the blockchain was made with upgrading itself

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in mind. So there's a furmal mechanism that makes this process, Um,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward and pretty seamless. So Um, tenth time, eleventh,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully hitting this Friday. Um. What kind of technical issues

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are you preparing for, um? and I wonder if perhaps not,

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because there was all this concern about the eutherium emerge

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and whether it would go off as plan and it

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>seems to have been kind of a non event. Yeah,

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this has been an excellent marketing effort on

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>behalf of etheroriums most vocal promoters to make listen to

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a big kerfuffle Um but actually, if you, if you

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>prepare these things, they tend to go quite smoothly and uh,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they'll learn that on their third or

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fourth time that they upgrade. Are How substantial are your

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>upgrades compared to the etherium, or even that you've done

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this ten times? Um. Yeah. So, I mean one are

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of Tessa's as kind of a philosophy, in

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a way of approaching um innovation is that when you

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have when you have upgrades that happened on a pretty

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>regular cadence or can be proposed a pretty regular cadence,

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to to use consulting speak, boil the

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ocean in one go, Um, and so these types of

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>things can happen Um, piecemeal. What I mean to say is,

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the testas consistus Algorithm has been changed wholesale twice,

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Um and and uh, and has also had a number

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of different improvements. That of edge towards Um Scaling, which

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be the next big challenge, Um,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for any blockchain, uh, you know, including ethereum of course. Um.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, a lot of these networks don't scale very well,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning they can't handle a lot of the transactions which

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is why you see different things like Um congestion and

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and fees rising, because the cost of Um, you know,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>going on the blockchain and having computation there is, I guess,

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>higher as more people use it Um. So scaling and

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>having an approach to scaling Um is something that we've

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>incorporated in the last two upgrades with test this and

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Inde Kathman do the one that's hitting on Friday. Um

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>introduces some some concepts and some technical capabilities that lean

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>forwards having a lot more people use the blockchain. Now

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it is climate week and we've been talking a lot

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>about cryptos energy problems. How much energy does Tesso's use

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and how have you been working to combat its carbon footprint?

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The tests blockchain has been proof of stake since he

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is an eighteen, meaning well, it was launched with proof

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of steak, which has a lot less energy usage and

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of smaller carbon footprint um than proof of

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>work that works, such as Bitcoins, notably Um ethereum transition

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, the proof of steak Um with with their

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>merge Um, and so I think that's been a huge

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>relief because I think it's it's been a fact about

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the industry which has antagonized a lot of people who

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise be neutral Um. And hopefully with ethereum's transition

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to proof of steake, that part of the conversation at

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>least starts to dissipate and we can focus on more

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions about the crypto crazy space. All right, well,

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching out for your eleventh upgrade soon. Taso's

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>CO founder, Kathleen Brightman, are we're going to have you, Kathleen.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for stopping by. Jesse Palell, the outspoken, in controversial

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Crypto Exchange Krack and, is stepping down

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>as CEO. Pal is known for his bold predict is

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about the future of Crypto, some of them right here

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on our show. He's also encouraged any, quote, woke employees

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>at crack and who don't align with the company's culture

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and values to leave. Um. He's gonna be replaced in

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>coming months by C O O David Ripley. He'll become

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the company's chair h and this is the first interview

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>since the announcement outgoing CEO of cracking, Jesse Powell, with

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>us now. So, Jesse, how did you come to this decision?

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Stepping up, not down? As you say. Yeah, I like

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to think of it. As you know, I'm taking a

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>higher level role, at the chairman level. Uh, you know

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how ultimate oversight over the whole company. Um, Dave Ripley

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>will be doing all the hard work for me. So

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Thanks, Dave. Um. So yeah, you know, I'm

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>excited for this next chapter. I'm extremely confident in David

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Ripley and his ability to to lead this company. You know,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he's been with us since we were fifty people six

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago, all the way up to, you know, mid

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>three thousand's right now. Um, so you know he's seen

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it all and I'm just super glad that we have

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>such a deep bench and someone able to to step

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>up from the inside. And you know, we we came

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>back around to David after running an external search and

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>talking to over a dozen other people and you know,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>he's still clearly the frontrunner after all that. So I

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's in really great hands and and I'll still

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be actively involved day to day. Hopefully this will give

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>me more time to go deeper on the product and

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>user experiences, which is what I really enjoy doing. Now,

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're in the middle of a massive broader market downturn.

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely bleeding into crypto kraken's market share, according to

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>some estimates, has shrunk by a third. Um. Did that

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>play at all into your moving aside up, uh, stepping up,

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as you say, at this time? Definitely not. This is

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>something we've been thinking about for over a year. Um.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a long time coming. I just felt

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like the time was right with the company being in

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a very good position right now in terms of our culture,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>our engagement of our employees, you know. So after the

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Jet Ski Program which you mentioned, and all the woke

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>employees left, you know, we ran a survey internally and

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if people are happier and more engaged and more satisfied

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>than ever. So I think the company is in a

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>great spot. We've we've recently aligned on our five year strategy. Um.

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's just it's just a good time for me

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to step away. Um, you know, after planning this for

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Of course they'll be a transition period.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're we're looking to hire a new CEO

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to backfill Dave. So they'll be a bit of a

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>handoff period. Um, but you know, every everything is great.

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I hate to go out at the bottom

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of the market. You know, I mean Dave's performance is

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>going to look amazing when things bounce back and I

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>won't get credit for that. But Um, you know, there's

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>never there's never a perfect time. So let's go back

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to those woke employees, as you called them. Of course,

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this was very controversial at the time that you said it,

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious if you faced any backlash or you're

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about facing any black backlash in your future endeavors.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Not at all actually. You know, after that whole thing happened,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we had a tremendous amount of support come in, record

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>breaking numbers of job applications coming in and you know,

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people were just waiting for

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody to say it and they're looking for a place

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>where where they can be themselves and not have to

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>walk on eggshells and, you know, they're looking for a

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>place where they can just get to work and work

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on important things and not be distracted by, you know,

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>little petty grievances that people have. And so, you know,

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually attracts people and and deters the

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>wrong kind of people that, you know, are really not

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cut out to be working in a professional environment. Now,

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Jamie diamond just had this to say about crypto. Take

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick listen. I'm a major skeptic on crypto tokens,

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>which you call currency, like bitcoin. They are decentralized ponzi schemes,

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>decentralized ponzi schemes. What's your reaction to that? I feel

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's better than the centralized Ponzi scheme, which is

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock market and national currencies. You know, I mean

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an upgrade right. We should be asking the question

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>is it and is it an improvement? You know, you

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>can point out problems with anything, and the question really is,

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is it not perfect, but is it an improvement over

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the existing system? And crypto helps a tremendous number of

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. There are tons of unbanked people

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world. It might be hard for Jamie diamond

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to understand that running a bank in the United States,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are people, billions of people all over the

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>world that don't have bank accounts or access to financial services,

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and Cryptos a real lifeline to those people. Now I

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have to revisit some of your predictions that you made

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>right here. One bitcoin, per Lambeau, I believe you said,

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the moon, infinity and beyond. You know

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't gotten there. And how do you reflect on that?

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.919
<v Speaker 1>And do you think it still will get there? And

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know just how much farther off is a

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand? I do think we'll get there. I look

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at this Rainbow Chart for Bitcoin. You know we're at

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. We're at the, you know, extreme buy territory

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, I bought in again at eighteen thousand.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm still very long term Wi ish. I

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>still haven't sold a share of my cracking stock in

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>eleven years. I'm extremely bullish on the company. I'm extremely

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bullish on Crypto. So, you know, I think the fundamentals

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just keep getting stronger for crypto. Uh, the user adoption

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps growing, the networks get more secure. You know, we

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>keep proving that we can do these upgrades to to

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>these networks in a secure, uh, in orderly fashion, and

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so everything just keeps looking better over time. You know,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the macro environment is playing a big role

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in what's happening with crypto now. You know, people don't

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>know if they're gonna be able to afford gas or

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>groceries next week. So that certainly affects one's discretionary income or,

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, ability to invest long term. But you know,

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>aside from the speculative value of Crypto, you know again

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's solving real problems for people. It does have

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a functional use case in in many parts of the world,

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, I think we should look at

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it more from that perspective, like what is the good

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>will that this is doing? Can we measure this value

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that the crypto brings to the world by some other

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>means besides like the financial value, you know, the appreciation

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the asset, but you know, what problems is it

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>really solving for people? Um, Jesse Powell, outgoing CEO of

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>crack in, Um, we'll be watching you in your chairman role, Um,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatever else you do next. Thank you for joining us.

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Coming

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>up Thursday I'll be interviewing Mark Bennie off at Dream Force,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the salesforce co CEO, and I will be with you live,

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and also the CEO of impossible foods as well. This

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg