WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Bair, Gorsky, Vakil

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals. The financial stories that

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>cheap our world fed action to con concerns over dollar

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest people

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Through the eyes of the most influential

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, star Ward CEO

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman J Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Be careful what you

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wish for. More vaccines and seamulus point toward recovery, but

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's going to be a bumpy ride.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. Maybe

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the most important development of the week, not just for markets,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but for all of us was Johnson and Johnson joined

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the elite club of approved vaccine providers, adding its millions

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of doses to the battle against COVID. We talked to

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>J and J chairman and CEO Alex Gorski about how

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they did it and how fast they can get that

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccine into people's arm. Look. From the very beginning, we

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to look at how could we design a the

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>very best possible vaccine in terms of safety, efficacy, dosing,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and and frankly administration and logistics and UH. And we

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>had a platform that had been used in more than

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand patients that gave us a lot of

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>confidence that the safety profile was very strong. We tested

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it thoroughly. And what's really important about our test, David,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>our clinical trials was we didn't start until September, and

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so just as we had come out of what I

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>would say the low point over the summer and we

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>started seeing cases increased, certainly across the United States, but

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>more importantly around the world, that's when our trial began.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So we were really into, you know, the the heat

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of the of the virus spread. Number two UH of

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>our patients were in the United States, but we had

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about in Latin America, and we had about fifteen percent

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're actually in South Africa, so where you know,

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the most difficult strains of the South African straint.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, of the fifteen thousand patients that

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we were working on, there are those that were infected

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>actually had the South African variant UH, and so it

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gave us a lot of data, and what we saw

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>were still very strong effectiveness rates in fact in serious

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>cases and a hundred percent of the time as far

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as kept patients out of the hospital and kept them

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from dying. UH. So we know that this is going

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a really important tool for healthcare providers around

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. And so go forward and take give us

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense of where you're headed. Do you envision a

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>world in which we have different versions of vaccine for

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>different variants or do you think we know enough now

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to think we'll be able to have one version that

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>will be good enough for all the variants. Well, David, look,

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think all of these vaccines work extremely well, and

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we've seen these kind of results from

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>three different platforms now is very encouraging. UM. And my

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>recommendation is everybody needs to get a shot as soon

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as they possibly can, because every time this virus spreads,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's transmitted and UH it could has the potential to

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>mutate to cause another variant, and so the faster we

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can get people vaccinated to stop that from happening, the

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>likely better outcome we're going to have. But the good

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>news is also is because of these new platforms that

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we have that are so much more adaptable, adaptable that

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>right now companies and ours included as working on next

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>generation should that be necessary. So we're gonna have to

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>see how this plays out over the next sixth the

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>next nine months. We could be in a situation where

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we see a precipitous decline in the virus. We could

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>see some surgeons in the fall that we need to

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stay protective of, or we could see where we could

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>need a booster shot or another shot further down the road,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>similar to what you do with the flu shot. But

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that being said, we're in a much better place today

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>based upon all the great science, research and engineering that

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've been doing. But Alex, when you have the

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>four million or who do you call to say worship

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ship them? Well, right now it's directly to the government.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So in the United States, the government determines it goes

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>from basically our our distribution facility and ups trucks to Macksson,

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the government works very closely to distribute it

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to the states. They're working closely with the governors as

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>well as with some of the large retail chains. And

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the good news is, David, I think now

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have a third vaccine out there, and and

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, kudos to Fiser and Maderna for also

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>significantly increasing their output. I would predict that in the

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>second quarter we're no longer going to be near as

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>supply constraint, and as we get more doses out, we're

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to open up some of the

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>requirements and restrictions regarding who can get the vaccine and

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who can't, And as a result, our throughput will go up.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're going to see a big difference

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>about the number of patients being vaccinated in the second

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>quarter around our country, let alone the world. Finally, Alex,

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I know you know you think strategically, and it's become

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a commonplace for all us to say the world's never

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>going be the same as it was pre pandemic. But

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what about for Johnson and Johnson for your industry. Can

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you see ways in which you're going to make different

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions about deployment of capital employment going forward? Does it

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>change the nature Johnson Johnson's business, what we've been through

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>here with this pandemic. We look, I said, there's a

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>few things that are very important strategic considerations for us

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And the first is the importance of global

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>public health. I mean, one thing that this pandemic has

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated that if we don't have strong resilient public health

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>systems in place, we don't have national security, economics, security,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or frankly security as a society. And so making that

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>investment focusing more on durability, sustainability, and maybe even some

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>redundancy versus just maniacally on effectiveness and efficiency is going

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to be critical for us. Whether it's storing ppe, creating

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine capacity, or the way that we even think about

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>handling surgeons in hospital is some isn't a very important lesson,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe for our industry. The second one for me, David,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>is just technology, and whether it's the technology of the science,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the way we were able to collect data quickly, take

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the genomic information, apply it to a platform, have three

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccines in a period of months versus what ordinarily would

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>require years. The way we've been able to share data

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and information to understand where this virus is and it isn't.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it represents just a significant increase in the

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>way we use data and the way that we apply

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that in decision making and healthcare systems throughout the world.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>That was Johnson and Johnson chairman and CEO Alex Gorski

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>coming up Walmart as your friendly neighborhood bank. We talked

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with former f d i C head Sheila Bear about

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the risks and the opportunities. That's next on Wall Street

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. We don't care what they

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>do as a retailer, but we are concerned about the

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>safety and soundness of the financial system. And this doesn't

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just relate to Walmart. It's any commercial industrial company getting

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>into banking and the threats that could potentially caused. That

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was former Ohio Congressman Paul Gilmore in two thousand seven,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>after Walmart's failed attempt to get into banking. Fourteen years later,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Walmart maybe taking another look at taking on Wall Street,

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this time with two veterans from Goldman Sachs Consumer Finance division.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They left Goldman this week to join a fintech startup

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>backed by Walmart and Ribbit Capital. Omar Isma'il was the

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>head of Goldman's consumer bank named Marcus launched in two sixteen.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>It was meant to get Goldman into the consumer business,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's been slow to gain traction. Here's Stephanie Cohen

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of Goldman. Sachs. We want to be the leading digital

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>banking platform, and the idea behind this is that we

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.119
<v Speaker 1>can be someone's holistic bank. Later this year, we planned

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to launch checking. We really think that's the final staff

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>efforts by retailers and startups to begin offering core banking products.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Pits fintech against Wall Street. You have fintech, big tech.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You saw Walmart recently, so we just have to be

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>prepared for intensified competition. We're ready for it. We're very

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>competitive and we expect to win. That's Jamie Diamond of

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Chase. Walmart has been trying to get into

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the banking business since the late nineteen nineties. It first

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tried unsuccessfully to buy a bank in California. Then it

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>tried again in two thousand and five, applying for an

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>industrial bank charter in Utah, which had hoped to use

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to process credit and debit card transactions internally. But the

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>retailer faced a firestorm of opposition from lawmakers and banking

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>industry groups. After two years and several delays, Walmart ultimately

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>withdrew its application. Here's Walmart CEO Doug McMillan. You can

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>go away quickly if you're not moving to where the

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>customer wants to be served in the future. So what

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do here is to get people to

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be really open to embracing what's next. Sheilabart was the

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>head of the f d i C when the agency

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>temporarily suspended Walmart's banking ambitions and encouraged the retailed to

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>partner with banks instead. I asked her, what is different

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>this time around. I'm not sure much is different. There's

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a financial technology has uh created new opportunities to provide

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>financial services, especially in the payments space, with with with

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>larger returns. So it may be that Walmart used this

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>as attractive um as you say that they tried to

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>get an i LC charter in two thousand five and

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six. I was actually chair of the

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>f d i C when that was attempted. It was

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>already an ongoing issue when I came to the f

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>d i C and I placed a moratorium on their

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>application because there was so much controversy about it and

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>asked Congress to resolve this whether they really want a

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>commercial entity like Walmart to own at an I l

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>C which is essentially a bank, and Congress never really

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out with it. It's still permitted. Walmart at that point

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>decided to withdraw the application, which I think was wise.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The Great Financial Crisis was, you know, coming, and we

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>had other things to worry about at the fdi C.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the policy arguments are the same.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think financial technology perhaps makes this more attractive now

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to Walmart. I can only speculate they haven't really provided

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>much public information about what their plans are. As you say,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the regulatory agencies disfavor a commercial entity owning

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a bank. There is an exception in this industrial bank

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of an interesting phenomenon. What are the risks from

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not having the full regulatory force applied to something like

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a Walmart? So yeah, so I think so their concentration

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of power. I think the traditional prohibition we've had on

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>this is the concentration of power of commercial, very large

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>commercial entities, you know, being able to build banking empires

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to That's that's a lot of concentrated power. So I

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's an issue. Also the impact on community banks,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, given Walmart you know, could provide a lot

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of competition. Uh. I think there's a fear there that

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they could really hurt community banks. So that's really uh

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the policy arguments against it, um but it's you know,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of safety and soundness. The other difference with

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the regular bank charter is that there's no holding company supervision.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So with an i l C, for a regular bank

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's owned by another entity, the FED exercises authority regulatory

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>supervisory authority over that holding company. With an i l C,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that. However, in the case of Walmart,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure that's an issue. First, the f

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>D i C always when they prove these I l

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>C charters contractually require the parent to provide financial support

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to to the i l C. And also, obviously Walmart

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has very deep pockets, so it's hard to imagine the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>situation where a bag of theirs would would get in

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble for one of the ability of the parent to

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>support it. So I think safety and sands is less

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of an issue in this content X, but certainly consumer

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>protection and the impact of the competition are very, very

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.479
<v Speaker 1>very real issues you mentioned shield of the possible squeeze

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on local and community banks. If the Walmarts of this

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>world get into that business, could there also be a

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>squeeze on the bigger banks as a practical matter, as

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>more and more big commercial energies come into their neighborhood

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and compete with them, for example, for a deposit taking, Well,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they could very well be And you know again it's

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that may be a benefit. It's uh one you know

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we've had with this terrible pandemic. We've had an accelerating

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>trend towards you know, a lot of branches closing remote

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>provision of financial services. It's less cost, it doesn't involve

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people personally interacting with each other, which has become an

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>issue with this pandemic. But there are still a lot

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of people who want a physical location to go to

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for their banking services. And Walmart can provide that with

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>all its stores of elderly people, you know, people lowering

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>some people who don't have access to the internet. The

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the ability of also provide not just technology to allogically

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>remote services, but also a physical location, I think is

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>an advantage that that Walmart could provide in a benefit

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to that segment of the population that still wants wants

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>an actual banking physical space to go to. So yes,

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and in that context, their their vast array of stores

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>could be highly competitive with these larger banks branch operations.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So as you're right, it's not clear that it would

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just be an impact to community banks. Well, you raise

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting possibility. I think we have talked for

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some time about the unbanked and the underbanked in the

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>United States, typically in poor communities, suggest and how we

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>address that. We haven't been successful terribly in doing that.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Could a Walmart moving in actually help address that problem

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>in the country. Well, I think they could. I mean,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think lower income and lower middle income Americans are

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>are are very big part of Walmart's UH customer base,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and so they're coming to those stores already. So yeah,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we need to know what Walmart plans.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>They just plan to, you know, fatten their profit margins. Well,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>good for them, but you know, that's not really a

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>public policy reason to provide the charter a group the charter.

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But if yeah, if they can leverage that reach that

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>they have with the unbank and undermank populations to provide

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a fuller panic ply of financial services at low cost,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at mainstream cost. Right, So people can go to payday

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>lenders and pawn shops now and get financial services that

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are very high cost. But if Walmart can democratize for

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the democratized credit and banking services and provided the same

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>cost that you and I get, and I think that

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would be hugely beneficial. So, you know, we need to

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned in terms of what Walmart is, what the

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>value proposition is that they're contemplating, But there's certainly a

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of potential there. That was Sheila Bear, former head

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the f d i C, coming up what broke

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain on chips just when we needed it most.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked with supply chain expert Ndia Vakil of Wrestling.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberth. This is

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The world's manufacturing supply chains are showing signs of strain,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and semiconductors or chips, are among the hardest hit. The

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>combination of the pandemic, policy decisions and the growing demand

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for electric vehicles created a perfect storm for the industry.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's GM CEO Mary Bara, this is an industry issue.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we're working every single day with a cross

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>functional team to look for opportunities of how do we

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>minimize the impact. In January, Honda said it will cut

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic output at one of its Japanese factories, while Nissan

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is adjusting production of its note hatchback model. GM announced

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this week that it's extending temporary shutdowns that's three of

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>its North American plants because of the ongoing semiconductor shortage. Well,

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter we have had some disruptions and idled

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>some of our plants, but it is still a volatile situation.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That's diner CEO Ola COLLINEUS. It's not just harmmakers. A

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>shortage of chips affects everything from five G phones to

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>medical devices. Here's Whahwei's Andy Perdy combination of a coronavirus

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and the the impact on not to be two technical

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the entity list, but the ability of American companies to

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sell the lesson others. It's really had a very negative

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>effect on us. The shortage has gotten so bad that

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>President Biden stepped in this week with an executive order

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>directing a government wide supply chain review for critical goods.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We need to make sure these supply chains are secure

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and reliable. I'm directing senior officials and my administration to

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>work with industrial leaders to identify solutions to this semiconductor shortfall.

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The problem has been brewing since two thousand nine, and

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump's trade war with China also played a

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>part in the supply crunch. Roughly ten percent of the

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>world's chip production comes from s m i C, a

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor company that's partially owned by the Chinese government. In

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twenty, the US restricted American companies from

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>selling to sm i C. So by dealing with the

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>availability of high tech, particularly semi conductors, to AWE and

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to ZE, we've slowed that down. That was former Commerce

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Wilburt Ross. To get a better sense of just

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>how bad the problem is and what can be done

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. We talked with Benda Vakil, CEO of Resiling,

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the leading provider of supply chain mapping services, and she

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>said that the problem has been a long time coming.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>This has been building since last year, and now we

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are looking at an extremely constrained environment. It started with

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two big battery fires at Japanese semiconductor plants, one in July,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>one in October. Then there were some labor strikes that

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ship making facilities in Europe, and then you combine that

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>with the upheaval from COVID. We had fired in California

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>record hurricane season winter storm to continue issues that we

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>have experienced container shortages. And then we saw Boeing seven

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>seven seven grounding, which grounds, which affects airshipment capacity. And

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>just last week we heard that in Taiwan there is

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a water shortage that is creating constrained water supplies which

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are very essential for way for fabrication assembly operations. So

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a very interesting situation. Well and is it just

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a fluke I mean? Or were there fundamental underlying weaknesses

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and the supply chain because what you just described sounds

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>like who could have predicted all those things would come

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>together at one time. Um, the world of supply chain risks,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, is it is a constant thing.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>There are in a given year resuling monitors over three

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred factory buyers alone. Add to that supply chain risks

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>due to hurricanes, arthquakes, labor strike, transportation issues, and what

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you have is a situation and supply chain where normal

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is is disrupted. Now we have the bud imustration saying

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get our arms around this. We're gonna start

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>with information, making sure we know what's going on something

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you may have some insight into and resoling.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that the right first step? Absolutely? In fact, I

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>would say the direction that the government is going with

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain right now. They first most critical. They have

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>caused supply chain resilience a matter of national security. This

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is the first thing that they needed to do and

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they have finally done it. Um Understanding the supply chain landscape,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>who the critical players are, what are the global sites

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and regions that are critical to the supply chain. This

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is the first step in helping us make informed decisions

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 1>about what are those sources of constraint supply that we

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>need to address, where we need to hold back up supplies,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where we need to hold extra inventory, and what it

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we need to do to avoid the similar

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>problems that we experienced in ppech shortages last year that

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>brought the healthcare industry to their needs. So it's really

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>criticals and and mapping supply chains and understanding those global

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>dependencies is the first step have we been spending too

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>little on our supply chain, because as I listened to

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you and as you talk about increased inventories, increased capacity,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like money that we in fact, we've been

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>running a two tight a tolerance. Absolutely. But the FoST

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>thing we did in the last twenty years is we

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>went overseas and globalized. Not the wrong thing to do.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>You not only globalize your supply chain to take advantage

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of lower cost supplies, you take advantage of emerging markets

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and the demand there as well. That has been vacill

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of residents. Coming up, we wrap up the week

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as always with our special contributor Larry Summers of Harvard.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio, and we're

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna conclude our week as we do every single week,

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with our special contrainion Larry Summers of Harvard. So Larry,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for being back. One of the big

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>events of the week was Fitchair J. Pale, speaking in

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a Wall Street Journal event. Talked about a lot of things,

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>including the body yield things like that, but one of

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the things he addressed was inflation, and he admitted is

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>how they're keeping a close eye on it maybe because

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of some of the things you've said, frankly, uh, and

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that they are not going to repeat the mistakes of

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the sixties and seventies as here before I do it.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>What does he need to do to avoid that. I

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sure hope they don't repeat the mistakes to the sixties

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and seventies, because they were hugely important, not just for inflation,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>not just for macroeconomics stability, but for the whole politics

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and attitude of the country. They're gonna need to look

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in hardheaded ways and to be prepared to not make

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>excuses each month pointing to a different factor when inflation

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ficks up, and they're gonna need to remember that their

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>priority is the macro economy. When I see them say

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they won't raise rates until UM diversity groups unemployment rates

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are appropriate, I get nervous because the FED can't really

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>control those issues. Those are issues for antidiscrimination law, those

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are issues for fiscal policy, UH, those are issues for

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>labor market UH programs. And so if the FED sets

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>out to target the unemployment rate of particular groups without

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>regard to inflation, that would be a good way to

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>make really serious uh inflation. If they take inflation seriously,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they monitor closely, and they're prepared to cause pain, they

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>will be able to control inflation. But if instead they say, oh,

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got credibility inflation, expectations are anchored and inflation is

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not something we have to worry about. Ironically, the more

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>optimistic they are about inflation being under control, the less

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>likely it is to actually be under control. So fed

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Cherrich Powell gave us a little bit of a hint

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about how he's going to approach this because he addressed

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. He said, some of the upticking

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>prices that we're expecting is going to be base effects,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>as there's a reopening effect as people come back. And

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>also there may be some particular choke points in the

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. We're not going to pay much attention to

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>those because that's transient. How do you tell the difference

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>between transient inflation something more troubling. That's why they've got

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a staff of a few hundred economists and precisely to

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>make those distinctions, and they got to look at all

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the data they can. What I'm worried about when I

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>hear that kind of talk is not that it isn't right.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>He's right about the base here, effects he's right about

0:23:54.160 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>specific sectors. But every great inflation is made by central

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>bank that dismisses it as due to transient factors. And

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>so at a certain point, when you start having a

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>transient factor every month, then you maybe got a permanent

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>factor going over going overall. So it takes a lot

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of worry about inflation to make their not be uh inflation.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a classic example of self denying prophecy. The

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more the fat is fearful of inflation, the more likely

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>they are to avoid it. The more the fat is

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>complacent about inflation, the more likely they are to have

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So Larry, one of the things that's a big item

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in the agenda now as we are working our way

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>through the stimulus package is infrastructure. President Biden has said

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that he wants to go onto that. He had meetings

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at the White House this week to talk about it.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked in the past about the stimulus package,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:57.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe what should have been done, what could have been

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>done before we get started. I FRA structure. Give us

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some advice. How do you do it the right way

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and how do you do it the wrong way. Here

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to broad principles, UH, David. One is Democrats are right

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that we need much more money on infrastructure, and Republicans

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are right that we need much more efficient regulation, much

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more rapid environmental approvals, and much more efficient procurement. And

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to do the politics of both add rather

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>than either or when it comes to infrastructure. The other

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>thing is this is an area where the public sector

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and the private sector have to UH collaborate. Some infrastructure

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>is public repairing the potholes and the roads in New

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>York City. Some is private building out a five G

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>wireless UH system. Some is UH joint UH toll roads, bridges,

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>electric utility, these UH and the like. We've got to

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>find creative ways to bringing the public and private sectors

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>together around the infrastructure UH issues. And we need to

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>understand that infrastructure is much more than bricks and mortar.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So infrastructure is good for all of us because it

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>makes our lives better presumently, but there's another purpose as well,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>which is increased productivity as we go forward. It's future growth. Essentially,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we're investing in a lot of us haven't had the

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>experience you've had being a macro economist in the US government,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>we've run companies or parts of companies. When we make

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a decision about capital investment, we take a look at

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the payback. When do we get the payback, what's the

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>long what's the prospects of payback? Do you look at

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it that way? I mean, how do you decide which

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>projects are the most likely to really increase productivity and

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>increase growth in the outyears. And if you've got to

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the overall social return. Some of that is

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the extra money that's going to get produced. Some of

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the carbon that's going to get mitigated that

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would have a substantial uh social costs. Some of

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that is the incremental business activity that's going to be enabled.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of that is and it's not always easy putting

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a valuation on amenities that people are going to enjoy.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Central Park is a kind of infrastructure. Very hard to

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>put a price on Central Park, but even harder to

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine New York City than out Central Park. And so

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to think very broadly as we think about

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of infrastructure. There's a spack frenzy some people

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>think of the country right now, and so we treat

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you as an expert, which you certainly are. But let's

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>treat you as a fact witness the way I used

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to when I put witnesses on in the courtroom. You

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>actually have gotten involved in this. Back here, as I understanding,

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you're an investor in a company that now is being

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>acquired by us. Back tell us about It's called the

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>States Title Right, I'm on the I'm on the board

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and have been uh an investor for a number of years.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Our company has the potential to transform title insurance, the

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>type of insurance where most of the time there's the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>highest ratio of premiums paid two benefits paid out. And

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>this company is going to transform its sufficiency by using

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. It's a huge business opportunity ultimately to transform

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the process of buying a house and make it pleasant

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and fast rather than excruciating and slow. This is the

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>most exciting thing that I've been part of in the

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fintech area, in the business area since I was on

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the board of Square before it became a unicorn. And

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a similar possibility for financial innovation, not

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit of money, but for the benefit of

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>making people's lives better and at at all important juncture

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for all of us when uh we're buying a home.

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think the spack is going to enable this

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>company to raise more capital, more quickly, for more growth

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and more transformation than ever would have been possible even

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>several years ago. So let's wrap this up with a

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire. Summer says Number. When we talked about j.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Powe the Federal Research here earlier, do you expect him

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to be reappointed? He should be. He certainly should be.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>He's done a great job and continuity in that role

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is a very important thing. On the other side, we

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>learned this week that Near Attendon's nomination to be the

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Director of Office Manage a Budget has been withdrawn. You

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>know her, Who do you expect to succeed her? Nobody

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>who will be able to do that job as well

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as uh she could have. She is a formidable uh talent,

0:29:54.840 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a person of great intellectual capacity, great editor, energy and spirit,

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and I am just really disappointed that the nation's not

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have her in that role. But knowing how

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>resilient she is, I know she will go on to

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>serve and to serve with great distinction UM in President

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Biden's administration. And finally, A Larry what's the future of

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the minimum wage. It looks like it's not gonna be

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>part of this stimulus package. What's the future? My guesses

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>will have a minimum wage that will be way above

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seven but won't reach fifteen dollars, and I think that's

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>probably the right kind of prudent compromise. Okay, thank you

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so much, Larry. That's Larry Summers, our special contributor, and

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of course he's from Harvard. Finally, one more thought. We

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>lost a giant this week, and by we, I mean

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>those who walk the corridors of power in Washington, those

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>who sit in the boardrooms of our corporations, those who

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>care about racial justice, those of us who care about

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>our country. Vernon Jordan did it all or all it

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that truly matters, and he changed it all. First as

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a civil rights lawyer and leader at the nub A

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>c P, the United Negro College Fund, and the National

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Urban League, and then when he saw we needed changing

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from the inside, he became an influential lawyer and lobbyist

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, an investment banker in New York, a corporate

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>board director, and a close advisor to presidents. He was

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>larger than life in every way. In his stature, in

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>his deep baritone voice, and measured tones in that twinkle

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in his eye, but most of all in his quiet

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>moral authority he brought to every gathering and to every decision,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And for those of us blessed to witness it firsthand,

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it was sometimes as much how he did it as

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what he did, A loyal and true friend, always there

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to listen, to remind us of our true north. At

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a time of so much division, so much bickering, we

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>need a Vernon Jordan more than ever the grace, the wisdom,

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and most of all the respect act he showed everyone,

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>respect for those he agreed with, and every bit as

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>much for those with whom he could not agree. Yes,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we lost a giant this week. I fear we will

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not see his like again, but I so hope that

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, for all of our sakes. That does it

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. See you next week.