WEBVTT - Elon's Bad Trip

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, Elon Musk gives now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled by one man, starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius. Legitimate, he says.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 3>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 3>be different. He'll vote Republican.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 4>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 4>on him.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 2>Anything he does is fascinating the people. Welcome to Elon Inc.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Where we discuss Elon Musk's vast corporate empire, his latest

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 2>gambits and antics, and how to make sense of it all.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm your host, Joel Webber, sitting in for David Papa Duplass.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It's been the talk of the town, so to speak,

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>for these last few days. On Saturday night, The Wall

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal dropped his story detailing Elon musk alleged drug

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>use over the past few years and discussed how it

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>has or hasn't impacted his businesses.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 5>After a report from The Wall Street Journal claimed legal

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 5>drug use was the cause of some of Elon Musk's

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 5>questionable behavior and executives are concerned about the impact on

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 5>his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Musk has admitted to drug use before, and of course

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>smoked weed with Joe Rogan that one time during a

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 2>taping of Rogan's podcast, so this wasn't exactly news, but

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the anecdotes raise important questions like could this impact Musk's

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>status as a federal contractor, especially given how much business

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX does with the US government. And we'll dig into

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 2>another headache for Musk and SpaceX. Last week, the National

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Labor Relations Board issued a complaint over the twenty twenty

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>two firings of SpaceX employees who were critical of Musk's tweeting.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX has since sued the NLRB in an attempt to

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>halt the case. To discuss this and more, will convene

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Lauren gret Us, Bloomberg's expert on all things SpaceX.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Lauren, Hi, thanks for having me.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Dana Hole, the world's most tenacious Tesla reporter. Hi, Dana,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>good morning. And Max Chafkin, senior reporter at Bloomberg Business Week. Hello. Okay, Lauren,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with you. What did this article

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>say and was there anything newsworthy in here? For you.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 6>I would say the biggest things that stood out to

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 6>me having covered SpaceX and this saga for some time

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 6>was an all hands meeting that occurred in twenty seventeen

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 6>in which some executives were concerned about Elon's behavior. Apparently

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 6>he was slurring, and about fifteen minutes into the all

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 6>hands Gwynn shot well, the president of SpaceX supposedly had

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 6>to step in and take over the all hands meeting,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 6>and then I think most of the article referred to

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 6>or reference the twenty eighteen Rogan podcast incident, which I

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 6>think a lot of people are familiar with, in which

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk, you know, openly smoked something on Joe Rogan's podcast.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 6>It's thought to be marijuana, And that was a little

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 6>more direct and that we all saw that happen, but

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 6>that one was well documented at the time. There was

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 6>a lot of fallout from that. SpaceX or NASA, you know,

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 6>got concerned. They did an audit of SpaceX and Boeing's

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 6>safety cultures in the wake of that incident.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you mentioned what happened on the Rogan podcast. We're

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>just going to play that episode so that everybody can

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>hear it went down.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So is that a joint or is it a siga?

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 6>It's no, okay, it's marijuana inside of tobacco.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so it's like plot tobacco.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You never had that?

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I tried one once.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Come on, man, you probably can't because stockholders.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, I mean it's legal, right.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we call that a blunt Dana. So, Dana,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>how do you feel like Wall Street journal reporting and

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>story compares to the incident that Elon waded through when

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>he was on that Rugan podcast.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, the timing of this is very interesting to me.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, twenty eighteen, Elon's companies were in a very

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 3>precarious position. SpaceX had not yet flown astronauts to the

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 3>space station. Tesla was struggling to ramp up the Model three,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>and the guy was like exhausted trying to keep both

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 3>businesses afloat. It was like a really precarious time. And

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>then the Joe Rogan thing was just like the stupidest

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>thing he could have done. Five years later, he's like

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the richest man in the world. Both companies are doing great.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is the dominant launch provider, Tesla is like the

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 3>best selling ev maker in the world. Next to BYD.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 3>From where I sit, like Musk amplifying anti Semitism had

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 3>a far more severe market impact in terms of like

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>stockholders being upset, pension funds writing letters, the stock actually moving. Then,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Like this story about drug use, and I mean, I

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 3>hate to be to break it to like the school

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 3>arms and the audience, but a lot of people in

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 3>tech and finance do drugs like a lot. It is

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 3>a thing like and it's and I'm not trying to

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 3>excuse the behavior, but you know, like Steve Jobs openly

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about how doing LSD like helps him become this

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>creative genius. And I think that for Musk's fans, the

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 3>fact that he is running all these companies while potentially

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>being on drugs is like another sign of how he's

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 3>this like incredible genius and blah blah blah, and it

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>just sort of feeds into his aura.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so there's you know, things that he've used before

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that had been known the ambience, the cannabis, but max LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, mushrooms, ketamine,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 2>some of which are you know, keine in particular, he

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 2>seems to have a prescription to help him do his

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>thing with but aren't those isn't that a different nature

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 2>of drug use when we were going into some illegal

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>territory there.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think kind of what Dan is getting at, like,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>none of this is outside of the norm in Silicon Valley.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>And if the Texas as described by the Wall Street Journal,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a handful of isolated incidents, a Rogan he

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>smoked a doobie on the Rogan podcast, he like takes

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>some ketamine. There was a party at Art Basel, It

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't that much. And I think they're really like two

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>possibilities here. One is Elon Musk is doing a lot

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of weird stuff online and we talk about it all

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, and some of this stuff is damaging, and

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one way to talk about that if you are a

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla board member, a SpaceX board member, or a critic,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is to blame something like drug use. The other possibility

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is maybe there's more to this story that was unreported,

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and like that's kind of what Dana is hinting at. Like,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the other possibility, but as it exists now,

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't seem all that damning.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to bring up his response, which he posted

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>on X on Monday, whatever I'm doing, I should obviously

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>keep doing it. And then he responded to himself a

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit later or actually just another user, and said,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.679
<v Speaker 2>if drugs actually helped improve my net productivity over time,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I would definitely take them. So let's see, he is

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>a drug user and is using them a lot. How

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>does this go over with his people? I mean, the

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>way you read that's funny.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like he said as he took a long

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>drag from a healthy joint.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.119
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to say.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think he's we should also proviso like

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it is not good to violate federal contracting rules if

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you are a federal contractor. But on the other hand,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to see the US government taking any

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of serious corrective action because, of course, as we've

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about many times, they need SpaceX and and people

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily calling into question rockets. And also, newsflash,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not a huge surprise that Elon Musk is not respecting laws, norms,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>or regulations.

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Dan, do you think there's any version of key man

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>risk here? Key man risk being a term that we

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>talk about in corporations a lot around corporations, right, if

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>if there is a CEO who can no longer or

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>do his job or her job, perhaps the company that

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>puts the company at risk. Do you think that there's

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>any version of this that key man risk plays out

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>over this scenario.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, so you know Tesla and their regulatory filings always

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about key man risk. I mean they always say

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>we are highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 3>who was not our full time CEO and runs several

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>other companies. And so yeah, I will like roll over

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>if like the next you know ten if the ten

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>K says and like our CEO is a drug addict

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and there's a key man risk that he might go

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to rehab and we'd be without like a CEO. I

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 3>mean that would be amazing. Elon is just not a

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>typical CEO, And I think that the trap that a

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of journalists frankly fall into is like we're trying

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 3>to like establish these norms for him when he has

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 3>broken all the norms and been wildly successful at it,

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and investors care about one thing and that is the

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>return on their money. Like since he smoked pot on

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the Joe Rogan Show, which we all know was like

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 3>a big deal, that really like hurt his reputation hurt

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>his standing with NASA caused this big fear, Like the

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>stock has returned I didn't even check. I don't know,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>like what like twelve hundred percent. I mean so like

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally his the investors are like they are used to

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 3>him being a weird guy.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I love that Dana is a four twenty friendly money manager.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Over here saying.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Ever since he started smoking weed, is the performance has improved?

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's not to say that the I mean, clearly,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 3>it seems like the board has concerns. So you know,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I would love to know more about, like what exactly

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>were the concerns. But I mean, obviously I'm not trying

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to be like, do drugs. Drugs are great, But I'm

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 3>just saying that, like a lot of people in power

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>use drugs, and a lot of people in power also

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>use alcoholic as though.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>If the financial performance turns around, then the story changes completely.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And Danna Strander wrote a story about this the other

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>day and made the point that like this is going

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to wind up in shareholder lawsuits and Andy by going

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>around talking about how fun it is to mix red

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>wine and ambient, you're essentially giving ammunition to critics. If

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the stock ever takes a dive. Right now, We've got

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a great Now, anyone who wants to explain why companies

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't performing well, if they stop performing well, has a

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>great story to tell.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you'd have to really prove that it was

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 3>because of the drug use. You'd have to like prove that,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>like he made a critical decision that was bad for

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the company because he was on drugs at the time.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Laurena, I want to bring it back to you because

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>if there were one company that seemed like it might

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with this a little bit more than

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>anybody else, it would probably be SpaceX because of the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>federal contracts the company has. And one thing that's different

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 2>now than in the broken episode was that, as I

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>think Dani alluded to earlier, this is how the US

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>gets astronauts to the International Space Station. So what might

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 2>happen and unfold at SpaceX or between SpaceX and you know,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>any sort of drug testing that might have to go down.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think you kind of pointed out there's two

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 6>key things that I want to bring attention to, and

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 6>why it's different now and why I think the response

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 6>will be different. Back in twenty eighteen, SpaceX hadn't launched people.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Yet, so there was still concern about whether.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Or not this was a good idea using commercial companies

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 6>to actually launch astronauts in the International Space Station. And

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 6>so when he took that drag, you know, they were thinking, Okay,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 6>maybe we do one last gut check in terms of

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 6>this space the safety culture at these companies, and so

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 6>that was really what prompted it. Now SpaceX has proven

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 6>that it can safely deliver astronauts to and from the

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 6>International Space Station on a routine basis, so giving up

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 6>that capability is going to be extremely difficult.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that I think is different is.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 6>That we saw him take the hit on the Joe

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Rogan podcast, like we had direct evidence that he did that,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Whereas with this Wall Street Journal story, they're referencing that

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen all hands meeting and they even said in

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 6>the story it could.

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Not be determined if the reason for his slurring was.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Drugs, And SpaceX did post what appears to be the

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 6>all hands that was referenced in the Wall Street Journal article.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 6>And having covered Elon for a long time, I watched

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 6>that video and it seemed pretty standard awkward public speaking

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 6>Elon to me, But I you know, I can't determine

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 6>what was going on before he took the stage in

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 6>that video.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 4>But point being, I don't think we have a direct.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Piece of evidence as we did with the Joe Rogan

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 6>podcast to prompt another substantial audit like NASA did back

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 6>in twenty eighteen.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it clear if Elon has ever taken a drug

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>test and or passed or failed a drug test? Max

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>they've said he has.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think our assumption is that he has and he's passed.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>If I'm wrong, please correct me.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Jenna.

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 3>He tweeted that he has right. He tweeted that he

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 3>like was tested randomly tweeted or x X I'm sorry

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>X that he's okay, okay, randomly drug tested at SpaceX

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>for three years and always passed with flying colors. I mean,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't know how. I don't know when

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>the most recent test was. I have no idea.

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Now we're going to focus on SpaceX and some

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>dueling stories that involve the National Labor Relations Board. The

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>NLRB issued a complaint about SpaceX and a labor situation there,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and is scheduled to hear that case in March. SpaceX

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 2>has since sued the NLRB, saying the agency is unconstitutional

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and the suit should be dismissed. All of this relates

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>to a story that Lauren Grush broke for The Verge

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>before she joined Bloomberg. So Lauren, we're going to start

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So that was a very intense week back in

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two. Basically I was going home for the day,

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 6>which is when you get your best tips, you know,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 6>and someone leaked to me that there was an internal

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 6>letter going around within SpaceX and it was a letter

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 6>posted to their Microsoft Teams channels, and that it was

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 6>pretty critical of Elon and they were saying, you know,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 6>I think the line that I kept pulling for stories

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 6>was that he was a frequent source of embarrassment for

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 6>the company and that they were calling on SpaceX to

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 6>distance itself from his public comments that they should be

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 6>better about sexual harassment.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>How did the company respond.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So it was the letter was up for about

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 6>a day and a half before they pulled it down

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 6>from the team's channels. And then after we published our report,

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 6>I started to hear that a bunch of the people

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 6>associated with the letter were getting fired. And then Gwynn

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 6>Shotwell sent out an email to the company. Really really

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 6>cule your email, in my opinion, because it was basically

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 6>saying that these rogue employees. I don't remember the exact text,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 6>but it was like these rogue employees were distracting all

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 6>of their coworkers and harassing them by telling them to

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 6>sign on to this this letter. You know, it is

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 6>a really very aggressive email painting a negative picture of

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 6>the employees.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And so it was a saga that ended.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 6>Very quickly because they swiftly fired the employees.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 4>And then after that we I spoke with some.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 6>Of the employees who were involved and they told me,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, how many people actually signed on to the

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 6>letter before it was taken down. It was hundreds of employees.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 6>But then yeah, after they were fired, they were discussing,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, whether that was actually a lawful move for

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 6>them to be terminated because they were simply expressing concerns

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 6>about their workplace conditions.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And shotwell, chief operating officer for SpaceX, what is the

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>most recent news then that's come out, because that was

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>everything that went down. There was twenty twenty two. So

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>here we are now twenty twenty four. National Labor Relations

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Board files this complaint which is technically its first move.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>What does that complaint say and how has SpaceX responded?

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so essentially it confirms what the employees were thinking

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 6>is that they were illegally fired for voicing concerns about

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 6>their workplace conditions. And given the fact that Elon Musk

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 6>is the CEO of the company, you know, what he

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 6>says and does can be considered, you know, affecting people's

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 6>workplace and how they performed that job. And then not

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 6>very long after the complaint was issued, SpaceX sued the

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 6>And this is the part where it gets a little wonky,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 6>but essentially they were saying that the way that the

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 6>NLRB is structured is unconstitutional, and so they're trying to

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 6>basically get out of it. But what was really interesting

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 6>about that lawsuit is SpaceX alleges that, you know, the

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 6>letter was a source of distraction for SpaceX employees, and

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 6>that the employees who were fired were fired for violating

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 6>various company policies. They didn't go into detail about it,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 6>but that's that is their defense. That's the biggest defense

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 6>I've seen from SpaceX since this whole thing went down.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Louren, as best as you can tell, what's the vibe

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 2>within SpaceX right now.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 6>I think the vibe, to be honest, is that everybody's

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 6>kind of putting their heads down and working. You know,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 6>this was probably the first time I had seen employees

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 6>within the company openly speaking about Elon, and it sadly

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 6>confirmed a lot of their fears, which is that if

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 6>you do that, you'll get fired. And so I think

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 6>the vibe within the company is that they're just.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Not going to do that anymore.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, if they do, I will be surprised, will

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 6>happily report on it. But yeah, I think it confirmed

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 6>most people's suspicions that, you know, you can't speak up

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 6>against the boss, You'll you'll be in trouble.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>The reaction is also just sort of classic in that

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 3>now SpaceX is suing the NLRB basically saying that what

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>they're doing is like unconstitutional overreach and really going like

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 3>guns blazing at the agency itself, which is, you know,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 3>another another sort of tactic that Elon has never shied

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 3>away from using. He thinks that regulation is run amok

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and there's too many rules, and they're going to really

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>go all out after this agency.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta say, I do think talking about these

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>two stories kind of in tanem is instructive. You mean

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the drug use plus this one hundred percent, yeah, Because

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you know, there's this kind of like divide

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where where there's like the weird stuff Elon tweets and

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff weird stuff, he says, and then the stuff

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he actually does. And I really think we spend probably

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and not just us, but investors and everybody spend probably

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>too much time talking about this, says versus the and

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>he you know, here we have some like legitimately bad behavior, right,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we have credible allegations of sexual harassment. There was also

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>an earlier allegation made by some SpaceX interns of sexual

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>harassment at the company. Yes, and the response yeah, and

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the response was, you know, basically to shut it down

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to dictatorial. It's it's basically the opposite of what Elon

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Musk says. He is, you know, you had you had

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>employees who seem to be and maybe I'm maybe I'm

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>putting too much on them, but and Lauren can correct me,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>but seem to be raising number one legitimate questions in

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a way that doesn't doesn't seem from the outside to

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be not constructive. It seems like they were attempting to

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>address this real issue. And yeah, and they were and

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>they were squashed, right, And that's concerning. And I'd say

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue more concerning from like a perspective of safety

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and all the things, the other reasons you might be

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>worried about Elon must drug use. This should concern you

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because like what happens if there's a legitimate if there's

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a door faull not to you know, make the Bonweing comparison,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>but right there's the doors falling off of these Boeing jets.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what happens if there's a similar safety problem

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you have employees calling attention to it. You want to

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>have reporting mechanisms. You don't want to have a company

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that just shuts down any descent. It's really bad at

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>any company, and it seems especially bad at a company

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like SpaceX and DAN.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 2>If there is one thing that sort of linked thematically

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>some of Elon's company, it would seem to be labor

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 2>relations and sort of the poor state of them. There's

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX and X obviously when it went through the transition

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>from Twitter Tesla, we've had multiple in the LRB stories there.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 2>What about the other ones in his universe, you know,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the Neuralink and the Boring. Is there anything else out there?

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess I would just say that I think

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>that fundamentally, a lot of employees really take pride in

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 3>their work, particularly engineers. I mean, these are mission driven companies.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 2>That have within Elon's companies.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 3>In Elons companies, yeah, I mean, these are mission driven

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 3>companies and people are really drawn to the mission, and

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 3>people really like working there in general, and they where

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 3>the SpaceX jackets and the Tesla ball caps, and like

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 3>there's just like an enormous amount of pride. I think

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to separate out like working for the company

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 3>and working for Elon. But yeah, I mean these are

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 3>not unionized workforces, and like any effort to unionize or

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>criticize your leader is like completely shut down, like almost instantly,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 3>which is what we've seen at all of his companies.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I can't speak to Neural Lincoln Boring, but

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 3>like you can't criticize the boss basically.

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 6>I also think the through line through these two stories

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 6>is kind of like the double standard of when Elon's antics.

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Are a problem and then when they aren't. You know,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 4>when he smoked pot.

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, everyone was very upset because there is a

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 6>very clear clause in NASA contracts that stays that you're

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 6>supposed to have a drug free workforce.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 4>But I think what.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX tried to do after that was say, oh, you know,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 6>this wasn't a big deal. You know, look, see we

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 6>have a totally drug free workforce.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 4>It's totally fine.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 6>But then when you call out behavior about sexual harassment

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 6>and making light of sexual harassment, then they say, oh,

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 6>you can't do that. You know, Elon is SpaceX and

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX is Elon. That was something that one of the

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 6>vice presidents said. So it's like there's the moving goalpost

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 6>of when we are allowed to be upset about Elon's

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 6>behavior and when you can't criticize him at all.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Now for our final segment of the week, Feud of

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the Week, Max Chapkin, do you know who the feud

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>with between Elon and Oh Man?

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It's my favorite other billionaire slash professional wrestler who's not

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>named Mark Zuckerberg, Mark Cuban, who's kind of like the

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>original in some ways, like a pioneer of the trolling,

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, billionaire category.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think Elon took that to new heights. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 2>So what is the feud with Mark Cuban.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, so Elon Musk has been, you know, for

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason. We can debate, you know, going.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>On and on and on and on and on.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And on about you know, the woke mind virus and

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the and the evils of diversity in the workplace. Again,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this is probably a potential problem for some companies arounds,

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but let's leave that aside. Mark Cuban chimed in and

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>offered what was really like just a kind of bland

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, kind of conventional wisdom y defense of diversity,

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>equity and inclusion in companies. Mark Cuban saying essentially, hey,

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like this allows us to you know, overcome some of

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>our biases to hire from more verse pools of people

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>get considered new perspectives. It also should say, Mark Cuban

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a big time libertarian, right, you know, too much for

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, and he's basically essentially spent the next few days,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, calling Mark Cuban a racist cringe, you know,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially using Mark Cuban as a punchline for his conservative followers, which,

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, it's not that hard to do that

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Cuban. I mean, there is a lot that

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is obnoxious and cringe and so on about Mark Cuban.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So so it's kind of like easy pickens. And we

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have what essentially is like a professional wrestling match between

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two billionaires.

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Which you know, we've we've seen this unfold before. How

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>has Cuban responded so far?

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>He's continue to offer sensible And I can't believe I'm

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>saying this because again, like this is a guy who

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, is famous for getting fined by the NBA,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and is you know, a shark tank judge. Like I'm

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be careful, but it has not always behaved like

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the most serious figure, but has generally attempted to like

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>defend DEI in libertarian friendly ways and is essentially just

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>getting shouted down by you know, Elon and his his buddies.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like both are kind of riding the

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>engagement wave on this.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Dana, I'm gonna ask for an impartial view of

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>feud of the weeks. How does this one rink compared

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to other feuds of the week that Elon Musk has had.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I would call it a mid level feud.

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, like a simmering five, Like, is it

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 2>like rolling boil yet? Yeah?

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 3>I think what's interesting to me is that, Okay, you

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 3>have to remember that Tesla is currently being sued by

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the EEOC and the State of California for anti black

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>racism at its factory in California. And you know, Tesla

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 3>has an incredibly diverse workplace, and the company releases first

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 3>ever DEI report in twenty twenty. Now, the DEI stuff

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 3>is always part of the annual impact report. So you

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 3>have this company that has made in enormous strides in

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of DEI as a corporation, and now the CEO

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>is basically crapping all over DEI saying that it's reverse racism.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So I just really wonder, like, is Tesla going to

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 3>have a DEI report for twenty twenty three or not?

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Like is that work being dismantled? Like what exactly are

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>they doing at the company level here?

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to sort of laugh at this.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like two you know, billionaires barking at each other loudly.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Texas billionaires.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but if you're if you are like a person

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of color at one of these companies, like it would

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty bad to have to like have, you know,

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>basically a very pretty sensible explanation of like why it

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to not hire an exclusively white male workforce,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and to just have that kind of laughed off, Like

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing is like it isn't good for

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of regulatory reasons, but also just for like morale

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>reasons and so on.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>It strikes me as not great.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 6>I also want to point that, if you know, given

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 6>my experience with SpaceX and when I know about SpaceX,

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 6>it does fly in the face of at least past experience,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 6>because they do have dei efforts, They have women's groups

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 6>within the company that they celebrate. You know, Gwynn has

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 6>also spoken publicly about trying to do better in terms

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 6>of boosting diversity within the company. So I don't know

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 6>if that's going to change, but I at least know

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 6>past efforts that SpaceX have tried to, you know, make

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 6>that a priority.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Som Branding to this feud of the way, I will say,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like Dan is right, it's like a

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>mid tier feud. This is not like, this is not

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>your like you know, Michelin Star eleven course tasting menu

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a feuds. This is like, I mean, the solid right

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean like solid midweek date night.

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like a farm to table restaurant.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like pretty good, but like not, you know, nothing,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>nothing out of the ordinary.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Max Chafkin, Lauren Grush, Dana Hole, thanks so much for

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>joining us on Elon Inc.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Always a pleasure.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Naomi Shaven and

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Rayhan Harmanci are our senior editors. The idea for this

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>very show also came from Rayhan Blake Maple's Handles Engineering,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott. Our

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 2>supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. That Elon Inc. Theme is

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>written and perform by Taka Yazazawa and Alex Segura. Saige

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcast and our executive producer.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber. David Pappadopolis will finally be back next week.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 2>If you have a minute, please rate and review our show.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll help other listeners find us. See you next week.