WEBVTT - Leading Off April 14th, 2025 (Ep. 975)

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Out here, there's no one way of doing things, no

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>one written rules, and no shortage of adventure, because out

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here the only requirement is having fun. Bank of America

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>invites kids six to eighteen to golf with Us for

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a limited time. Sign them up for free one year membership,

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>giving them access to discount to tee times at thousands

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of courses. Learn more at Bankofamerica dot com slash golf

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with Us.

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>What would you let the power to do?

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Restriction supply CPA dot com slash golf

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with Us for complete details copt right twenty twenty five.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy pros MLB. This is leading

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>off Live. It is me, Joey Pjop's APPEA with me,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>of course is the Welsh, and it's all of you,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the Peanuts and the cracker Jacks here on a Monday morning.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So much to talk about, so much baseball. We've got

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>prospecting with the Welsh, We've got injuries, we've got big performances,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>we've got big hair from the Welsh. And a weird

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>weekend of home run calls. According to the Wonky Penguin

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and apparently over the weekend, just one home run from everybody.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>How could that be Welsh? How could that be? How

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't for me?

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you because it was. No judges, no

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>o Tawnis. That's probably why everybody doing the Joe piece

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Apia School of home runs just put one of the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>top two best home run hitters for the entire week

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>in in perpetuity and try to go with it. It

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>didn't work. Didn't work.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 2>It did not work. Also not working. The top story

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>today in the headlines the Justin Steel's elbow, it's not.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Working arms of an angel.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Justin Stealing four will not be pitching again this season.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 2>He will undergo the traditional Tommy John procedure or the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>internal brace. We don't know which one we're going to

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 2>get yet, but his twenty twenty five is done and

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>it's April, which means that we're probably looking somewhere around

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>what like mid twenty twenty six that we get Justin

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Steel back. So brutle loss for or fantasy managers everywhere,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but I honestly also a bigger loss to the Cubs,

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>because although the Milwaukee Brewers' rotation so far has been poop,

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>you can look ahead, and you see Myers on the horizon,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>You see Woodroff on the horizon. You see a prospect

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna talk about today that we've already mentioned last

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>week on the horizon. They're gonna figure it out. I

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>think this now becomes the Brewer's division to lose again.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Cubs with Imanaga and the rest

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of those Jebbronis in that rotation can compete well. Sho

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>am I overreacting.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Uh No, I think like that he's the ace, he's

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>the top guy of their staff. It already was kind

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of like a little bit of a looser rotation. If

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>they were to go and make a move, it would

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>have made sense for the pitching. I will say this,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 3>we are going to talk about a Cubs pitching prospect

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in prospecting with the Welsh that could potentially be a guy.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 3>But that's it, Like this is this one guy I'm

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about's kind of like the guy. They've got a

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>ton of hitting trading assets. We're gonna do it. Marlin's Cubs.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>They should have an nice, good phone conversation because you've

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 3>got Kevin Alcantra, James Treanto's Moises Ballastero's. They've got hitting

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 3>prospects above hitting prospects, just not a ton of pitching.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's where there could be a home. But yeah,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>this is a brutal blow to the Cubs. I think

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>they need to be aggressive in that division because not

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 3>only like you were saying, kind of poopy for the Brewers,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>they got guys looming. The division is very obtainable right now,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and losing a guy like Justin Steel, you could lose

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>that division. So I wouldn't be surprised that they don't

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>start making some calls and try to get whoever is available.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 3>That's the other tricky thing, like we just know Al Contra,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>we don't really know anybody else that's available. But very

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>very sad for Friend of the Show.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Justin front of the show, we wish him well. Is

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>a shame too, because you started to turn things around.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>The last start was really good, and then that second opinion, well,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>it's never good. It's never good. Let's turn our attention

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>to something that was really good yesterday, and that thing

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>was Garrett Crochet. He got really close to a no hitter. Ironically,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Chase Mydrath, who was part of the deal for Garrett

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Crochet with the Red Sox, who, by the way, as

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>a four to twenty five career OBP. I was just

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>looking more deeply into him because I picked him up

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 2>in my home league this weekend. If you're an OBP league,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you got to pick up the skit. He's playing second

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>base two, He's doing a little bit of everything he is.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 2>He gonna hit for power, no, the little stone bases, maybe,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 2>but he's gonna get on base in points leagues. OBP

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>leagues pick him up. But anyway, this is about Crochet

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>seven and a third innings was toying with a no hitter,

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>eleven strikeouts. It was against his old teams, against the

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>White Sox, and it was such a stunning performance and

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>so moving that our own Mike Mayer was moved because

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>he had basically had it with all of the negativity

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Welsh was throwing and all the raised eyebrows

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>about potentially what Garrett Crochet mayor nine looked at early

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>in the season. So let's take a live look here

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>at Mike Mahyer returning serve here after Garrett Crochet's near

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>no hitter in brilliant performance.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 4>Happy Monday, America, or should I say Happy Monday to

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>everybody except Welsh. And I say that on behalf of

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Garrett Crochet, who went out there on Sunday and shoved

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 4>And when I say shoved, I mean shoved it in

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Welsh's face, because Welsh came on here last week trashing

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:25.559
<v Speaker 4>Garrett Crochet. I'm worried about Garrett Crochet. He doesn't look great,

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't have the fastball, the change up, doesn't look good.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 4>The guy at a one point four or five era,

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and Welsh came on here last week talking about him

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>like he's Paul Blackburn. Get out of here. Oh, isn't

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>good enough for me? Eight shutout hittings against Oriols doesn't

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 4>good enough for me? Get out of here, man, ridiculous.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 4>How about flirting with a no hitter? Is that good

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 4>enough for you? Is that gonna do it for you?

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Welsh?

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Flirting with a no hitter? Or are you gonna have

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 4>some excuse about how he didn't look good in this

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 4>start too? You know what, Cally, who makes all of

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 4>our lovely graphics with all the jay's in him that

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 4>we all love, Let's have a new spelling change for

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the season.

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Let's start spelling.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Welsh's name differently, Let's do lowercase W, lowercase capital L

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 5>for Garrett Crochetes L, lowercase S, lowercase.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 4>H, because you have to own the L here. My man,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 4>you were wrong, dead wrong. He came out there, looked phenomenal,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 4>flirted with a no hitter, eleven strikeouts. I don't know

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 4>what you're gonna say about this one, but I'm sure

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna have something to say that he didn't look good.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 4>And I just got to say, get out of here,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Get out of here.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to go home, but get the heck

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 4>up out of here with that nonsense.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Wow, you just got lowercase by Mike Mayer. Angry Mike Mayer,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>who had had enough after watching Garrett Crochet's near no

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>hitter bid Well, it's tough to get lowercase. And if

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you look right now on the graphic below you you'll

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>see it's happened. You are now, Chris Tell.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Actually it's kind of lowercase.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, lowercase W, E, upper case L, lowercase SH there,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>so that happened real fast. What's it like to get

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>lowercase on a Monday morning? By Mike Mayor.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, do you remember the movie Office Space

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>where it walks around, they say where whatsoever his name goes.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>You ever had somebody tell you it's a case of

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the Mondays, Like, oh, hell no, that was a case

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of the Mondays right there. That was How long was

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>that video, Kelli? Could you tell me the exact time,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>because if it was sixty two seconds, it was sixty

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>seconds too long. The things we've actually ever done, I

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>can appreciate the pick on about questioning. I mean, I

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 3>forgot we're here on a minut at forty three minute,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>forty one too long. I forgot. We're on a show

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>where we don't actually question anything tangible. We just look

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>at everything surface level, like make me maybe Mike Mayer

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>does on the cycle, and we just look at surface

0:07:58.120 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>stats and we just say, this is the best thing.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 3>But Garrett Crochet had not been great. This is also

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>coming from the guy that is Garrett Crochet at four

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>in his overall rankings this year and was the biggest

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Crochet guy. And they're almost as stupid no hitter

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>against the White Sox. I'm all here for Garrett Crochet.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm the number one Garrett Crochet guy. But it was

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>right to question things look kind of weird with Garrett

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Crochet early on, but it was cold. We mentioned that

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>probably rightfully to answer some or ask some questions. But okay,

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the l if.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's the question. Are you still concerned all

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>those concerns now gone away?

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Listen if you? Okay, a couple of things. First off,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Like Garret Crochet is my guy, Garrett Rach, I'll I mean,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 3>if there's an L to own, I'll totally own it.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Garrettkrousche is my guy.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>But like that's true.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think like almost no hitting the White Sox

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 3>is something to be like, hey guys, he almost no

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>hit the White Sox. Everything is okay now, like no,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 3>but the start was like freaking great. It was incredible

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>as fastball was back, big wift percentages, Sinker was doing

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 3>some business. Why socks hand hit fastballs. I love me

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>some Garret Crochet. I will take whatever l this is

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be. But I also had Garrett Crochet higher

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>than anybody on Fantasy pros, so suck it.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I thought I was the angry one,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>too bead, but apparently it's Mike Mahyer nowadays. So Monday morning,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Mayor the mayor Bear was a little upset there. Good times,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>so we'll see.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Well worth the segment on the show definitely made the

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 3>show better.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh hilarious.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I thought I laughed the whole time.

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>You laughed on the inside. All right, let's talk about

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>some aces that looked really good. Michael King another rarity,

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>complete game shoutouts. Well, we had one Sunday the Rockies.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you know, not great opponents, but who cares

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>because the Padres are in first place? And Nick Pavetta too,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to lose the Pavetta start on Saturday.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Ten strikeouts from him. Also fantastic, Nick Pavetta, What is

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>going on? I'm telling you, man, the Padres get their

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>hands on a picture. You draft that guy. Logan Gilbert

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 2>also fantastic. Seven strikeouts, five innings, two three eight ERA points,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 2>sixty six whip thirty two strikeouts, just four walks in

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty two winnings. Cold Reagan's also great. Struck out ten

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>and seven two thirds against the Guardians one hundred green

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 2>seven shoutout innings, got more one hundred mile an hour

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>fast balls than anybody else in baseball. He struck out

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>eight against the Pirates outside of Garret Crochet. Of the

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>rest of these performances, which one was your favorite? Which

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 2>one stood out the most to you?

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Welsh Nick Pavetta. But you know, I mean again, you

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 3>gotta be careful because if we just look at the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>cycle surface stats here, Nick Favetta is a cy young

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>potential winner because he was so good.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Dragon worm into this, This is this is just Mayor.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm sorry, yeah, I don't want to.

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to unfairly drag the worm into this.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>This is all Mike Mayor. So far is a far

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who was holding the camera. It looks

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>like it was just on a tripod.

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just saying, but Nick, Nick Pavetta, But it

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 3>was against the Rockies. Like, let's also caveat some things

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 3>when they're worth caveating. Nick Pavetta was absolutely incredible, but

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 3>it was against the Rockies. But it doesn't take away that,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>like he has been great. He's giving up a lot

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 3>of barrels right now, which is something to watch. But

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>his strikeouts are about on par where they were last year.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 3>He's just not giving up a whole lot of runs.

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 3>He's great in San Diego. It's kind of everything that

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 3>we were kind of hoping for. But you know, take

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 3>this start move it forward, as like you can feel

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>very comfortable with him. I don't think there's any type

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 3>of cell or anything like that, but as far as

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>like what you weren't expecting necessarily like Pavetta's Pavetta's early

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>onset of the season should like have everybody pretty excited

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.599
<v Speaker 3>because he was kind of free ninety nine. You know,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 3>he's probably like sp like oh yeah, five or six

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>or something like that.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>League winner. Right now, here's one from link. Would you

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>start Carlos Estevez er job versus case in a weekly

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 2>points league, wins or three quality stars are five, saves

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 2>are seven. If I'm just sitting in forgetting for a week,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take my shots with Estevez. I actually like

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the Royals today against the Yankees with Lugo in the

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>mound against Carrasco. So that's seven points right there for

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a save. I'm thinking, So I'm going to Stevez, how

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>about you?

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm down with that. Like job definitely looked better

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 3>in this last star. But yeah, if you're gonna get

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>seven points per seve, if it saves are more than

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 3>a win, go with it.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Hate that this is why I don't like five x

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 2>five rodal because it's like, oh, I've got Chase saves

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and something that saves three outs. It's one freakin' inning.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>It's it's three outs. I mean sometimes it's more, but

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 2>rarely nowadays. And it's just so frustrating. A win is

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>five innings at least of pitching, right, a minimum five

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>innings to get a win, and yet it's valued the

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 2>same or in this circumstance and a bad points structure

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>less than a save for its three outs. It's absolutely dumb.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I hate it. It's stupid. Now I'm mad, all right,

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 2>let me get happy again. Spencer Schreider is going to

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 2>be back on track to make his debut Wednesday against

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the Blue Jays. This is great. He looked filthy. Five

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and a third innings, thirteen strikeouts in the rehab start.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Nothing left to prove. Marcus Simeon took a spot on

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 2>the bench one of our by lows. Look it's rock

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>bottom here right now. He's getting one twenty three, one homer,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>no steals. I mean, Marcus Simeyon is good. I can't

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>think of a lower point in his career, all the

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>way back into like this, beginning of Oakland, Like that's

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the last time you could see Marcusimey in this low.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 2>So I'm buying everywhere. This is a unique opportunity Welsh

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and now it is officially rock bottom.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, yeah, how you were saying that. I wasn't

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>sure if you were like just saying like the output

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 3>is low and you're still a by or you're just.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Like the output were about twenty three and we were

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about how you know, just last week that he

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>was a by low. Now he's getting benched. You know

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 2>he's still get at the top of that order. I mean,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying Marcus Imyan. Still, this is great news if

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you're still in that market.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've I've been saying it, but yeah, everything just

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't look good. But the Rangers as a whole, you know,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Jack Berger doesn't have things going, adult East is trying

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to bounce back. Simon is one of those. Simon is

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the one that's the interesting thing about is just like

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 3>everything is low from like an underlying standpoint, Like he's

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 3>not hitting the ball as already striking out more, he's

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 3>not barreling. Like everything just looks bad. So I think

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>there's that little thing that's in people's minds. That's like,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's getting older, four years old, like when

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>is it gonna start downticking? But that offense is just

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 3>it's too it's too big. The environmentally great. He's leading

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 3>off like he's gonna he's gonna bounce back, and if

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't bounce back, then it's like, you know what,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 3>then you can keep that. You can keep that L there.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>By the way, it's kind of a nice logo, by

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the way, the we with the big L s A. Yeah,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I kind of like it. It's it's not about the

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>only thing the logo.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>The only My only critique of Mayor is that he

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>gave the L in the wrong direction when he was

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>throwing it up there. But that's hard sometimes because you

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know which way the camera's going. That's all right,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>that comes with experience.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Kelly for keeping this up. We'll keep this

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>up the rest of the show.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Then, oh, we are a couple questions about Michael Bush.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Be weezy, you pick him up, you think he stays hot.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>You have McGrady here with the question is he must

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>pick up? Any thoughts on Michael Bush's recent hot streak.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Here, Yeah, I think he is.

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Should people be chasing the hot bush? I guess that's

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the question we're asking ourselves.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.239
<v Speaker 3>I would be chasing the hot bush. But here's the problem.

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Every damn player that is really good right now is

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>like a first basement. Someone asked me on Twitter before

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the show, like, Hey, They're like, hey, Tristan Constans is

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>out there, who should I drop? Sodastrom Torque And You're

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>just like, oh my god, Like you know, they're all

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>just in a really good spot. But you know, Michael

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Bush is almost fifty percent hard hit right now, right now,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>strikeout rates going lower, launch angles up, He's barreling the

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>crap out of the ball. He's putting a pretty good

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>prime spot. I don't know, Like, if you had to rank, okay,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 3>rank Michael Bush among let's put let's put yeah, torqu

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and soda Strom. Let's just put him out there.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll take Torkals, I'll take Soderstrom, Torkalsen Bush. That's my ranking.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>But is there a tier difference? Because I think that

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>might be the right one. But is there a tear difference?

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think for me still, I think that Well, look,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the soda Strom hawstreak has been fantastic because of that ballpark.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm still gonna I'm gonna keep those two guys.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna so Stroms here. Okay, I'm gonna go give

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>me the levels. Here's the level for this is very technical.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you're watching, this is helpful. If you're not,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>if you're just listening on the podcast, it's not gonna

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>be helpful at all. Go watch on YouTube. So sod

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Frum's here, Towrklosen's right about there, and then Bush is

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit lower in this tier here, so you're

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Of sealation ginormous. How you did that, by the way, Well, no,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it's a huge tar well like you used the whole screen.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Michael Bush. I kind of know Michael Bush is not

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Spencer Torkosen was a top overall prospect at one point,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>so there's always that hope that all of a sudden

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>he figures out and becomes a star. I don't I

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think we're ever going to get that, but it

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>still exists. Michael Bush is just a nice player, Like

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I never thought Michael Busch was going to be a

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>franchise building player, whereas we all thought Torkosen would and

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Soda Strum again, it's the ballpark factor that I just

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>can't deny right now. I've got to stay locked into him.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Bush is in the corner endfield like pick

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>up twelve team corner infielder. I think you think you

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>can pick him up right And he said, nuver three

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred XBA is like right under three hundred. He's doing

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of everything great, not even pulling the

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>ball a ton in the air as much as he

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>did last year. I think he's in that range of

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>those players. He just actually might be available, you know

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 3>where Sodastrum and Torque would have already been picked up.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Want to shout out correlation first time on the twitches

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 2>here used to be on the YouTube side. Welcome Correlation.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>We love having you here again. Twitch dot tv Sash

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pros where you can watch us live every Monday

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 2>through Thursday here noon Eastern, and of course you can

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 2>always watch us back video on demand on our YouTube channel.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe trying to get to thirty thousand subscribers. Let's talk

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 2>about Mike Trout for a moment. Mike Trout up to

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>six homers, tied for the league lead. He has fourteen rbi.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 2>He is hitting just one ninety six though, with a

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>two ninety nine OVP. Now last year, right, if you

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 2>just kind of duck back a little bit, you know,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to the twenty nine games that he played in twenty

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty four he had two twenty he had ten homers

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 2>and fourteen RBI. And we started to ask ourselves in

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>mid April, is this the time to trade Mike Trout?

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember this conversation we had last mid April

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>where he was starting to get hot with the homers

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and we thought, up, he's back. Do you want to

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 2>get out from Mike Trout? So twofold question here is

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 2>it time to get out from Mike Trout? And second

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>question Welsh? Can you get out from under Mike Trout

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>if you want to?

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean you know the answer for me, it's gonna

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>be no. You hate Mike Trout. I love Mike Trout.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 3>I was Trout well, I mean you were like, you

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 3>don't draft. I mean I had him so much higher

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>than any of you guys, Like Mike Trout was on

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 3>my All Welsh team for this year. I'm a big

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 3>buyer on him, regardless of the stupid injury stuff.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Can hold on it's not stupid injury stuff. One hundred

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and thirty four games in twenty nineteen. He has only

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>played Okay, we had the short season in twenty twenty,

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 2>then thirty six games one hundred nineteen eighty two, twenty

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 2>nine and fifteen so far this year. So it's not stupid,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it's relevant and it's real. Just saying, I mean, I

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 2>dismissed it, say it was.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm it felt.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 2>A little dismissive of it. I feel like a little

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>bit where like all the silly injury stuff, it's not silly.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a reality for this guy. Oh it sucks,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's true.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>So I am a buyer of Mike Trout as I

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 3>was and I still am. If you want to sell him,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>you could. It's probably not a great time he had.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>The average is low, but he's got a one thirty

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 3>two babbit. His expected adding average is around two seventy.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 3>He's hitting the ball super hard. We're gonna get average.

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>That's gonna come back. But that silly or big injury stuff.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 3>If that, if that's the thing that you want to

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 3>push for, that's okay. I understand that. Because you got

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>screwed last year. Just like you said, but you need

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 3>to wait a little bit. You need to wait for

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 3>the average to come up. That's great that he's up

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 3>on homers, but people are still going to hold you

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>back once he's around like two forty two to fifty.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 3>If you want to get out, get out. But I'm

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>still in the place where if I'm getting one hundred

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred and twenty games out of Mike Trout,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think the return is going to make

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>sense because any single person like you're doing is going

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>to throw the injury caveat in a trade, and what

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 3>you can get from a production standboy to me is

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 3>going to make more sense. But you know, let's see

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>what the returns are if you guys want to get out,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 3>But this is not the time to trade Mike Trout

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 3>right now now when he's hitting under two hundred.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, A good job by somebody putting in the

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>chat there too. The XB A sixty nine, I think

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 2>also real quick Jacob de Gram after three starts as

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a four to three ERA and a six point two

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 2>one whip excuse me, six point two one fip not whip,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 2>pardon me? So so far the Jacob de Gram results

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 2>have not been good either, just putting that out there,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>not been great, not being great. Beat. There's a question here,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Strider or Pepio, Boston and New York and that Bogus

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Ballpark weekly lineups, and I'm loaded with two star guys

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>this week. Look, I'm gonna take the two starts from Pepio.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 2>He's been so good. I'm just gonna lock that up.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I want to get both these guys in the lineup.

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. I guess, well, she's kind of

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 2>rocking a hard place here.

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Points league gets pretty easy. I'd go with Pepio. Boston's

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>offense has just been so blah. Yeah, I mean, you're

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you're probably gonna have Strider on some type of a cap.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit it's it's also a little bit

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 3>of a tougher matchup, and Bed said it is points,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, go with Pepio.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Michael King at Houston or Peralta versus the Athletics. I think,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I got go Michael King here. Like it's

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>just been crazy. He's been crazy good.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>He's doing his like he's doing like back and forth,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 3>he's doing like weird back and forth right now. But

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I would go with Michael King. Like one starts good,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>one's bad.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go down the farm real quick. Here

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the Orioles prospect, Kobe Mayo hit a solo home run,

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>so that's good, little signs of life for him. Ben

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Williamson called up by the Mariners. And I believe I'm

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>saying this right. Audiel Amador recalled by the Rockies from

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 2>TRIPAA to play second base. But you know what that means,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>we start talking about the youngsters. It's time for prospecting

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>with the Welsh. That's right. Every week the Welsh goes

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>deep into the minor league prospects and brings us some

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>names that you need to know. So Welsh, let's start

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>here with Nick Kurtz, because he just does not stop

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 2>hitting home runs every single day, more and more home runs.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>He's up to seven out, hitting three sixty with a

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve hundred ops. And you saw Brent Rooker move to

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Alfield for the weekend. A couple starts there. You saw

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Sodashirm taking grounders at third. I think Nick Kurtz is

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>coming sooner than later. He's only rostered fifty percent of

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>leagues right now.

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 3>He's the number one guy. This is these first two

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 3>guys are kind of like should be the no brainers

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of peace. But these are our updates.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 3>So this is the Nick Kurtz update, of course, the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 3>most important thing, and we got to monitor how it's

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 3>going to go this week. I think this is going

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>to be critical to how aggressive they push it. But

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 3>we saw Brent Rooker play right field over the weekend,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 3>by the way, which was interesting. You would assume more

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of a left fielder. Lawrence Butler was getting the day off.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 3>They put Shae Lang the leers in at DH. It

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of opens up a path, but then they went

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>right back to Rooker playing DH on Sunday. Let's monitor

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 3>this week. If Rooker does have at least even one

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 3>more outfield game, I just don't know how much longer

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 3>they can keep him down there. He has more homers

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 3>than anybody in professional baseball right now, so that is

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 3>major leagues or minor leaguers. He is just continuing to

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 3>smash the ball, big exit velocities, consistent exit velocities. He

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 3>will thrive in that ballpark. We did a breakdown last week.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember if it was here, I think it

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 3>was on the live stream. We did on Wednesdays four

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>pm Eastern if you guys want to hang out. Not

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 3>with Piece of Pa this week, but me and Joe

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Rico we did a breakdown of the ballpark factors this

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>year year and that A's minor league ballpark. There's just

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 3>no doubt about it. So Kurtz is going to absolutely

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 3>thrive when given the opportunity. They're showing us little tiny

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 3>baby signs of what it could look like where Rooker

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>would play left, you'd have Butler and right Bledet in

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the outfield. Right now, Miguel and you are is the

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 3>one holding Nick Kurtz back a little bit, and I

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 3>just don't think the A's are going to allow it

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>too much longer. So Kurtz your number one hitter that

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you should be stashing.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's no doubt about it. I think it's going

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to be this week, Welsh, I really do. I got

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 2>a feeling in my bones about it. Hopefully I'm right.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Bubba Chandler. He had another good start

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>at TRIPAA, so when White might we possibly see him

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>back again with the Pirates.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's got to be soon. The only

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 3>thing is in this last start, I kind of thought

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>they would push the pitch count up a little bit.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>So his first start was pretty wonky. He was he

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 3>walked three, he only had fifty two pitches fastball, slider.

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Second start, he looked phenomenal. Even when he's off though.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>His fastball and slider just they generate big whiffs, you know.

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Bubba Chandler like a high nineties VLO guy. Eight strikeouts,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>four innings, two walks. His next start, he just had

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 3>four innings. He gave up his first couple earned runs,

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 3>his first homer, struck out six, didn't walk any. Batting

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 3>average is low, but they didn't push the innings. I

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 3>think he's got to have minimum one more start, and

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I think they got to push him to seventy and

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 3>then I think he's on the clock, so I think

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 3>sometime in late April early May. That's why, if you've

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 3>got the ability to you should stash a guy like

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Bubba Chandler. Not all prospects are like, even if they

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 3>come up, are worthy of getting out there. Bubba Chandler

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 3>is a guy that right out the shoot you're gonna

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 3>want to get in. He's gonna have high strikeouts, Hopefully

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the walks are gonna be maintained, but I think that's

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>what they're looking for. No one's getting a good batting

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 3>average off of him, and I think it's going to

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 3>be one more start after this where we could see him.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>So both Bubba Chandler and Nick Kurtz could be anywhere

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 3>from a week and a half to I mean you

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 3>go much further, but like within the next two weeks.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 3>I think both of them really, really, really could be

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>on the major league teams.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>All right. With the injury to Justin Steel, that means

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 2>open spot in the rotation. So for the Cubs, what's

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the internal options look like? Is there somebody maybe you

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>have her mark that could get an opportunity sooner than later.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So from the minor league standpoint, we've got to stare

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 3>at KD Horton. So that's gonna be a guy that there. Yeah,

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if in the like immediate while they're

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out what's going on, if they're going

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>to throw him in there, but with these injury issues,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I think it is something they're going to look at.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Kate Horton's got two starts so far with the Triple

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 3>A Cubs in the miners A one, two, three, Era

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 3>twelve strikeouts, little bit walky, that's going to be his problem.

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 3>He has seven walks in seven innings pitch, but he's

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 3>also struck out twelve. He's also kind of on the

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Bubba Chandler pushing the innings. He would be very fantasy interesting,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>but we've got to see, like what that consistency's going

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to look like. Cate Horton's like a top prospect as well.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 3>He's just had some injury problems for the last kind

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of year and a half, not getting tons and tons

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 3>of work. But I don't know if they'll throw him

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 3>in right out the shoot. They may have some just

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 3>like weird internal option, maybe look into the free agent market.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 3>But I do think we should pay attention to Kate

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Horton because there's some good strikeout potential and great offensive support,

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 3>and I think he's about one of the only actual

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 3>viable They might have another option or two, but he's

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 3>one of the viable options that they could go to

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>now that Justin is going to be out.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>For the year. They're up against it, though, I'm telling

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you the Cubs are in a bad spot. They could

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's three guys they couldn't afford to

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 2>lose this year Ibanaga Tucker obviously, and then Steal and

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 2>this just puts the Cubs in a bad spot. No

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>offense to Horton here, he can hear all the whos

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 2>he wants. There's no way he's going to replace Justin Steele.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>He just can't do it. So maybe give you a

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>couple starts, maybe you know, can get the walks under control.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 2>That would be nice. There is a picture that I

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 2>am excited about. Now, maybe it's going to get a

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit more complicated for Logan Henderson to make it

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>to that rotation with Woodruff getting another rehab start this

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>week and Tobias Meyer's working his way back. But regardless,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 2>you have to look at the work so far that

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Logan Henderson has done this year. Fourteen innings, twenty four

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts for him three point two. I talked about him

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 2>on the Sunday TV Show quite a bit. This is

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the guy that I want to stash on my bench

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in deeper leagues because I do think at some point

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be ten to twelve starts to be had

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>for Logan Henderson because if you keep pitching like this

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and now all of a sudden there's an opening in

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 2>this division that maybe, just maybe the Brewers are like, Okay,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>we're right back in this thing. We can fix some

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of the things have gone wrong. Yes, the rotation has

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 2>been rough to start the year. But Logan Henderson could

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 2>be one of the answers.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 3>Wellsh I do think he could be the I mean

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 3>they've also got Jacob Mizerowski, who I really think when

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Miserowski comes up, he's probably gonna if it's this year,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 3>it would be in some form of like relief. There's

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 3>still some like you know, like walk questions with him.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Logan Henderson had that a little bit early on, but

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 3>his last start really picked it back up. He's now

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 3>got a three era. He's striking out everybody I've mentioned,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, cause I watched him a lot last year.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 3>He's a command guy, and I think he is best

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 3>suited because that's the other thing. Miserowski's kind of the

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 3>bigger fantasy talent. But I think Logan Henderson's best suited

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>to jump into a rotation and maybe hold it for

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 3>a bit. But like you said, there's weird questions about

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, you've got tobias and you've got Woodruff coming

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 3>here soon. But it doesn't mean they're not going to

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 3>need the help. Logan Henderson's last really good start kind

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>of activates that clock as well. So he's a tier

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 3>under the guys we've been talking about. I mean, I

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 3>think he's Him and Kate Horton are kind of in

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the same general vicinity Kurtz and Chandler. You just got

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>to do it. These guys, they might be really interesting

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 3>spot stars or more interesting to hold if they are

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 3>given like a long term look at a rotation. But

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I expect Logan Henderson and Kate Horton to probably get

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 3>a look in the very near future.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 2>All Right, one more guy for the Marlins you want

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 2>to talk about. It's actually a catching prospect.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Augustine Ramirez, former New York Yankee. I love Augustine

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Ramirez big hard hit numbers. He's he's super weird too,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's just minor league career because he's one of

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 3>those guys, like, first off, we don't see big stolen

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>based numbers from catchers, and you kind of always assume

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 3>they're going to go back down. Still twenty two bases

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>last year, hit twenty five homers year before that, he's

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>stole twelve year before that, he's stole thirteen power has

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 3>increased four straight minor league seasons, and so far in

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Triple A he's hitting two to eighty with a three

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>forty five OBP. He's stolen four bases again, He's got

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 3>two homers eight of his eight of his fourteen hits

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>or extra base variety. And this guy is consistently hitting

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the ball hard. There's some strikeout stuff with him, but

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I kind of thought he might get a look here

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>soon because Nick Foortes went on the IL and they're

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>running up two lefty catchers. They've got Liam Hicks and

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 3>I think Rob Brantley. I think with also what the

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 3>DH situation is looking like there with like Jonah Bride

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and how gross that is that you might see Augustine

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Ramirez come in and do some DH and catching here

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 3>in the very near future. So I think he would

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 3>be kind of two catcher league fantasy relevant with those

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 3>big homers. So I take a look at Augustine Ramirez

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 3>or Augustin Ramirez.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Great question here from rip my WiFi is Kurtz is

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 2>so good they'd be willing to drop Torko center Ben Rice.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>That is a tough but I think This is you

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>know what people can start asking themselves. They're going to

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 2>look at their roster and say, who do I want

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>to drop for Nick Kurtz. I have a tough time

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>dropping Rice for him, and Torkosen's performed very well. It's

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 2>probably a no for me on those two. But Welsh,

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>this is tough. Maybe I don't want to drop a

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 2>one for one first basement of those are the types

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of guys though, that are the bottom of your roster.

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>You might not have a choice. So would you drop

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Rice or Torkelsen for the lottery ticket of Kurtz?

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I would. There's a little part of

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 3>me that doesn't buy what Torklsen's gonna do all season long.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 3>His strikeout rates still really really high. But I think

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 3>I would not make that move quite yet, because it's

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 3>also it's still in question. We just don't know about

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Nick Kurtz and when he's actually going to be up.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>We're just playing speculation. So to drop like really really

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 3>productive players right now, I don't think so.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's prospecting with the Welsh. Everybody make sure

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 2>you subscribe to the Fantasy pros Mlbutube channel ring the

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>belt to that goes day, and of course drop your

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>comments below, because somebody's gonna win a Nico Horner jersey

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>from Pristine Auction when they do so again. Prospecting with

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh every single Monday here on Leading Off Live,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>or you can catch it video on demand on YouTube.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the three up and three down. Oh,

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 2>there we go. I was worried for a second there.

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I felt so unclothed. All right, up, Pete crow Armstrong.

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>According to Cubs fans, look, I'm giving the Cubs some

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of positive two home runs for him. You know,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the Cub fans are not feeling good. Wonky's very mad

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>at me for telling her that the Cubs are in

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a bad spot. There, Code I Senga seven innings, four hits,

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Mets shout out the Athletics, eight nothing, jung Huli two

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 2>home runs yesterday four Ribby's great win for the Giants

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 2>over the Yankees. Three down. Carlos Rodan not good. That

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>era is at five four eight. Now, this is interesting

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>because he was kind of cruising here and then the

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>wheels just kind of fell off for him. Five and

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>two thirds innings for him. The Jung Huli homer was

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the one that kind of you know, really tanked him there.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Chris Sale allowed four runs, just three earned, four and

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>third innings, But I'd be buying on Sale. His ERA

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is at six point sixty three right now, his ex

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>FIP is at three point three to two. He still

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>got twenty four strikeouts and nineteen innings. This is a

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>great by low opportunity. I know Sales a little older,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>so or always con Okay, are we getting to a

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>spot where maybe you know something's wrong? I don't think

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 2>it is. I think the Braves are just off to

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a weird collective start. And then Zach Wheeler another big a.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So these are three big pitching names having bad weekends.

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Four runs and six innings for him. Who are you

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>most concerned about? Wheeler, Sale, Rodin.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh Radon with like out a question those other guys,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm really not. Redon's walks are way up right now,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 3>even though he does have a three two two expected era.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, so it's he's just uh in the wrong direction,

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>overly performing. The expected batting average against is really low

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 3>as well, but I don't love the walk rate. The

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 3>ballpark also just doesn't feel super great, and the back

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>half of the of his starts are starting to become

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of a question. And also you pair them with Zach Wheeler,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 3>who's the top five SP and then you pair it

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 3>with Chris Sale cy young Winner. If I have to

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>pick between them, it's not even remotely close. It's Carlos

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>for don. But I'm with you. I'm buying if I

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 3>don't think there's anything with Wheeler for anybody. But if

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 3>someone was looking at those starts with Sale one hundred percent,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 3>by right now.

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you're trying to manage all your leagues,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>let us help you with my playbook from Fantasy Pros.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a suite of powerful tools that help you make

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>better decisions, manage lineups, and win your leagues, because that's

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>what we're here for. You can import your team, sink

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>your leagues for free, and get custom Fantasy Baseball news, rankings,

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and analysis. So do it today at fantasypros dot com,

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>slash MLB my Playbook or download Fantasy Baseball My Playbook

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>app right now. Sink your leagues for free and start

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>letting my playbook help you dominate all your leagues. Here's

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 2>some good ones here. I'm gonna run through these. We

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>drop Shaw for Kurts, I say yes, what's say you?

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Would you drop casses for rice? Yes? One thousand percent?

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably?

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And would you drop cruise for Kurts? Mmmm, that's tricky.

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Do what about cosses for Kurts? That trick here? I'm

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna say no too. Okay, this is good. This is

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>how we're we're trying to get to, you know, a

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>little sense of what's available here, what's uh, what we

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>should be dropping, what we shouldn't be in order to

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>pick up the process. So injuries George Springer day to day.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>X rays on the leftist came back negative, but I

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine he's going to be out for a couple of days.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Breton Doyle absent for the lineup again Sunday he has

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 2>a quad issue. Richard fitz goes on the fifteen day

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 2>il with the PEX strain. That's not good, but on

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the good side. Zach Netto with the shoulder, played nine

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 2>innings at shortstop in his rehab start on Sunday, so

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 2>we expect him to be activated this week. Tobias Meyers

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>won five innings and the second minor league rehab start,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 2>three runs, six hits. Liam Hendricks a scoreless sitting for him.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if he works his way back this week.

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Lance mccullor is the name we haven't talked about in

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a very long time. He's gonna make another minor league

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 2>rehab start this weekend for the Double A Corpus Christie team.

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Clark Schmidt will make his debut on Wednesday, So Schmidt

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>comes back, Spencer Schreider comes back Wednesday, and then Terry

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Francona still hasn't made a decision about activating Alexis Diaz,

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>so at least some help is on the way with pitchers.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know we've been through a long winding

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 2>road here with Lance mccullors over the years. If you're

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 2>in a deeper league and you're kind of hurting for pitching,

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 2>would you speculate on mccolors. I wouldn't.

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 3>I have no interest in Lance mccullar's he's okay, he's

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 3>always injured. I mean, there's a guy more injured reprone

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 3>than Mike Trout. It would probably be Lance mccullors. So

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 3>I have almost no interest in Lance McCall he's let's

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>see him do it. There's so many more interesting players

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>out there. I would probably rather have a stream spot

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 3>open to stream out guys than I would hold on

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 3>to Lance.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Mccullor's let's talk about mydraft for a second here too.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I kind of touched on him earlier. I don't expect

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a law from this guy, but if you're in a

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>fifteen team league, especially OBP, you should grab him. He's

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 2>gonna hit at the top of the order. The White

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Sox have no reason out to play him every day.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Teal should be up pretty soon too. This is kind

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of crazy. I thought he was going to get the

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 2>call when they catcher injury happened. He didn't, So I'm

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 2>not expecting a great season from him. But if you're

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in a points league or OBP, I think he has

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 2>some value. Welsh, what do you think of him as

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a prospect?

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in points league, I've never been super big on

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 3>my draft, but like, he's kind of kind of Jacob

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 3>wilsony where. Yeah, I don't think he's in a strikeout

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 3>super ton. He's gonna get on base. I mean he's

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 3>sucking a decent amount right now. He hits for a

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of average. It's going to be empty ish ish

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 3>from the power and speed department. Not like to really

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 3>big degrees, but like you said, he's gonna probably end

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 3>up moving a little bit higher. I picked him up

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 3>in a played in like the sixteen team league, his

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 3>head to head crazy league. I swooped him right up

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>because he's going to get regular playing time between short

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 3>and second, and I think they're committed to him. And

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 3>that was something I had said with Brooks Baldwin. When

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Brooks Baldwin started playing some outfield, it was like, Oh,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 3>they're just clearly opening up this spot, so my draft

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 3>could move between both positions. So really good for your

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 3>batting average, Probably not going to be great for a

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of other things. OBP plus points plus All.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's that time, boys and girls, the time for

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the best bets of the day with Joey P and

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh. I'm going for some games today. That's right,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 2>moneyline Monday for Joey P. And oh oh no, look

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>at that. The Welsh is still the capital L in

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 2>the lowercase here too. I love a good running joke,

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that's what I can say. Oh, I'll give you the

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 2>money line today for the Kansas City Chiefs plus one

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>sixteen on the road against the Yankee Seth Lugo in

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the mound against Carlos Cookie Carrasco. I know which way

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that cookie crumbles, and it crumbles with a lot of

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 2>runs typically, So I'll take the better picture on the

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 2>mound and take my chances. Yankee offense kind of scuffling

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit over the last couple of days. Give

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>me the money line for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers against

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 2>the Buccaneers. I've been doing football all day, not the Buccaneers,

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.959
<v Speaker 2>the Tampa Bay Rays, the Rays, my bad, and the

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Boston Red Sox today minus one sixteen Shane Bos who

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>got bumped a healthy bump yesterday. There's nothing wrong with him.

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>They just moved him a day. I don't know what's

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 2>because they, you know, are somehow gonna drop latel out

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>of the rotation or what. I don't know what's going

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 2>on there. We didn't really did you see anything about

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 2>why Bos got bumped yesterday?

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean at younger pictures they pushed They also they

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>put in Joe was Joe Boyle, who was really good,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 3>and they might end up wanting to keep in the rotation.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think it might have been setting up proper

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>rotational stuff. So no, the answer is no. I didn't

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 3>see like an official word for it, but I don't

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 3>really worry about young pictures getting pushed like a day.

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 3>And then also it aligned with Boyle being really good

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 3>and them talking about keeping him in the rotation.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Look anything to keep Lttel out of it. And we

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 2>don't know when mclodahn comes back, but regardless, give me

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the money line for Tampa with bos on the Mount.

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Boz over his last ten starts going back to last

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 2>year has been fantastic and I don't think enough people

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 2>were taking notice of it. And then Houston money Line.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 2>My boy friend Bervaldez. He's going against Sunny Gray. Probably

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the only picture that I fear even remotely in Saint Louis,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 2>but I don't feel Saint Louis is up to task.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 2>So give me Houston money Line, Tampa money Line, and

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Casey Royals not the Chiefs on the money line. Welsh, Oh,

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 2>where are you're going here? I've got NFL Draft on

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the brain. I guess where are you going? For your

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 2>best bets of the day.

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 3>On Monday, I'm gonna jump into a strikeout prop. We're

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna go with Terry Scouobel going up against the Milwaukee Brewers,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee Brewers higher up there on the strikeout marker, especially

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 3>against lefties, So Terreke's scouble at seven feels pretty good.

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Handful the guys this weekend. This gun shy right now

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 3>with how some of this stuff has been going. But

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 3>just everybody this weekend was just chalking up. It was

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>just Crochet striking out, Reagan striking out. We're gonna get

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 3>back with Trig Scuoble and a pretty good matchup here

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Lefty on Brewer, So that's a little bit juiced up,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 3>might even be worse this morning, but Treg Scuble over

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>six point five strikeouts, Toronto first five money line, and

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I am backing our boy Lucas. I'm on the Toronto side.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Let me get the match up here up against Atlanta.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.959
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta has absolutely struggled against lefty, so Easton's out there.

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 3>I like them on the push or obviously on the win,

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 3>so first five innings for them to be winning, I'll

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 3>either push or take that. They've also been scoring through

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the first five. Atlanta's offense has just been really struggling,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>So Easton, Lucas, I'm backing here and Pittsburgh Washington Nurphy,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Paul Skins is back in and the Lord, I am

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Lord Lord, Lord, Lord Brad Lord has been sneak good too.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 3>The organization really does like him and I think this

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 3>is a good, good matchup to start the day for

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 3>a no run through the first inning. So Toronto first five, Pittsburgh, Washington,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Nurphy and Terry Scooble over six and a half strikeouts.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>So those are my picks.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, and remember when you're making your bets,

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 2>make sure you use the Betting Pros app because right

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 2>now you get a free seven day trial of Betting

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Pros Premium if you download it today wherever you get

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 2>your apps, and use that promo code leading off to

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 2>unlock exclusive betting tools including the MLB prop bit cheat sheet,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 2>the betting systems and the same game parlay builder using

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>sharp Ai and so much more. Download the BP app

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 2>today for Betting Pros, use the promo code leading off

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and use the premium this week to start betting smarter,

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 2>not harder, and also make the most of your bets.

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Go to fantasypros dot com slash leading off where at

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 2>FanDuel new customers can bet just five bucks and get

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>two hundred bonus bets if they win once again. That's

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Fantasybros dot Com slash leading off. Let's go to the

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 2>home run board, boys and girls, and you got lowercase

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 2>here too. Oh my goodness. But it doesn't matter because

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:00.479
<v Speaker 2>you're on this board and I don't see Mike Mayor

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 2>on this board, Welsh. So maybe you could record a

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 2>video looking for him in different places around your house

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 2>or you know, in the mailbox or in the dryer.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Where's Mike Mayor on the home run board? I don't know.

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I've only got two. I'm miserable so far. But nobody

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 2>had any home runs this weekend. It was a very

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 2>weird weekend. One home run all weekend. I'm gonna go ahead,

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 2>and this is not piggybacking the Welsh. I put this

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in there, and then I realized after I put it in,

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 2>and I want to change it that Bobby Witt was

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 2>my pick today in Yankee Stadium. So Bobby Wit is

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>my guy, Welsh, where are you going with your home

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 2>run call for today?

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, Bobby Wit was my guy, so I was the

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 3>first one to have Bobby Witt. But so I'm not

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>going off with the guy that I picked Chicken, So

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm also used to there with Bobby Witt.

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so well, should I are picking the same guy

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 2>where hopeing that Bobby Wit HiT's a home run? I

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know who everybody else out there is hoping hits

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 2>home runs today. But you can go to our Discord

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>fantasypros dot com slash chat. And remember when you subscribe

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>using Amazon Prime, you get access to the home run channel.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And since nobody pulled away this weekend, that Sami Sosa

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Jersey is still very much up for grabs. Somebody ask

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a good question here too, it's Rip Agan. Would you

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 2>drop Ben Rice for Soderstrom? Somebody dropped Soderstrom for torkal

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 2>sin on the way we wire.

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 3>I love Ben Rice too. I think I've Ben Rice

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 3>over even Soderstrom right now. So no, I wouldn't drop

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Ben Rice.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, there you go. So a lot of things

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 2>going on in Major League Baseball world. I know, before

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about Trout, I mentioned Jacob de Gram

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 2>in passing any patnic about Jacob de Gram at all.

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Curiosity A little worried.

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm absolutely a little bit worried. I gotta be

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 3>careful about being worried about anything here, because that'll blow up.

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I have some fun never.

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little worried about Decron. I am a little

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 3>bit worried.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe Rico will be here tomorrow. I want you to

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 2>press him about Jacob de Grom because it was nobody

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 2>more Jacob deGrom than Joe Rico going into the season,

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>so I want to hear his take on it. I'm

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna be on vacation for a couple of days visiting

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 2>family cousin Donnie's house. Kids are going to hang out together,

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 2>and I say kids are all teenagers now, and hopefully

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday, we'll be doing Leading Off Live together Welsh

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and myself from the same room. That'll be super fun.

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping that works out. But Joe Rico will be

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 2>picking it up for me this week, So shout out

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to Joe Rico. Be nice to Joe Rico. Everybody, don't

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 2>lowercase Joe Alrico all caps for that guy. Giving me

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days off here before the NFL Draft

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 2>comes next week. And as you can see, I called

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the raise the Buccaneers, which means Joey p needs a

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 2>vacation for a couple of days. Spring break. Who Welsh

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 2>any final thoughts for today before we close things out.

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Nope, I'm gonna go work on making a super super

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 3>awkward video that has nothing to do with anything I'm

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna have for the next couple of shows. So I'm

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna go on, Now, what's the length of that video?

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Gonna be minute forty four just so it could be one

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 3>second more awkward than all.

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, that'll do it for us, but the story of

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the game goes on for the Welsh I'm Joey p.

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 6>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 6>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 6>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 6>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB