1
00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:12,400
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

2
00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:15,880
Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

3
00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:18,959
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

4
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:21,239
Speaker 1: tech Are Yet, it's time for us to cover the

5
00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:24,480
Speaker 1: tech news for the week ending on March twenty ninth,

6
00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:29,520
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, and our first story is that FTX

7
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:36,800
Speaker 1: cryptocurrency exchange and Alameda Research founder Sam Bankman freed AKASBF

8
00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:40,920
Speaker 1: faced sentencing for his multitude of crimes relating to playing

9
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:44,320
Speaker 1: fast and loose with a whole lot of people's money.

10
00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,160
Speaker 1: SBF had sought a light sentence of just a few years,

11
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:52,400
Speaker 1: while prosecutors were hoping for a forty or fifty year sentence.

12
00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:55,760
Speaker 1: He could have faced a maximum of one hundred and

13
00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:59,600
Speaker 1: ten years in the jailhouse, but Judge Lewis Kaplan has

14
00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:03,200
Speaker 1: decided on a twenty five year sentence, not as heavy

15
00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,200
Speaker 1: as what prosecutors wanted, but way the heck more than

16
00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:09,399
Speaker 1: what SBF was hoping for. The judge said that the

17
00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:14,679
Speaker 1: defense had put forth a pretty lousy effort, plus SBF

18
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:19,120
Speaker 1: had engaged in witness tampering, which affected the judge's decision.

19
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:21,680
Speaker 1: Now of course, this isn't the end of it all.

20
00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:26,880
Speaker 1: SBF does plan to appeal both the decision and the sentence, though,

21
00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:29,920
Speaker 1: considering the issues of witness tampering and such, I think

22
00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:34,120
Speaker 1: he probably faces an uphill battle on that one. He

23
00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:37,520
Speaker 1: has done himself very few favors. In the wake of

24
00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:42,399
Speaker 1: his empire collapsing. An English data company called Savanta conducted

25
00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:47,120
Speaker 1: a poll judging American's opinions about banning TikTok, and the

26
00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:51,400
Speaker 1: results are unsurprising. So according to savantah only around twenty

27
00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:54,360
Speaker 1: eight percent of all respondents favored a ban on TikTok,

28
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:58,880
Speaker 1: and one of the questions they included asked if respondent's

29
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:02,920
Speaker 1: friends would try to find ways to continue to access

30
00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:05,440
Speaker 1: TikTok even if it were to be banned in the

31
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:10,720
Speaker 1: United States. That particular question got a sixty percent affirmative response.

32
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,600
Speaker 1: I guess this was actually Savanta's way of saying, look, mate,

33
00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:17,080
Speaker 1: I'm not saying you'd break the law, right, I'm not

34
00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,160
Speaker 1: saying that, but your friends. Right, there's some shady characters,

35
00:02:20,200 --> 00:02:22,640
Speaker 1: any of them likely to slip around the corner, maybe

36
00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:25,760
Speaker 1: log into a little VP, maybe do a little scrolling

37
00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:30,080
Speaker 1: on TikTok. A anyway. Like I said, the results are unsurprising,

38
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:32,920
Speaker 1: but they might very well provide the US Senate with

39
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,560
Speaker 1: some food for thought, as that body now has the

40
00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:39,080
Speaker 1: responsibility to take up this issue or to you know,

41
00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:41,160
Speaker 1: not take it up. They could do that too, They

42
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:44,280
Speaker 1: could just not consider it. I still think it's likely

43
00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:46,639
Speaker 1: that the Senate is not going to pass this bill

44
00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,520
Speaker 1: into lab because the perception is it would be very

45
00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:52,360
Speaker 1: harmful to their chances of getting re elected, and that

46
00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:57,480
Speaker 1: seems to be a pretty big driver in politics these days. Meanwhile,

47
00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:00,880
Speaker 1: TikTok has invested more than two million dollars in an

48
00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,760
Speaker 1: ad campaign in an effort to pressure the Senate to

49
00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:07,760
Speaker 1: drop the proposed ban legislation, and they've targeted the ads

50
00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:12,160
Speaker 1: and battleground states where Democrat senators could face a pretty

51
00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:15,520
Speaker 1: darn tough reelection campaign if the public were to be

52
00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:19,760
Speaker 1: totally cheesed off at them. Specifically, they are running ads

53
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:24,800
Speaker 1: in Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Montana, and Nevada, And when you

54
00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:27,360
Speaker 1: know it, each one of those states has a Democrat

55
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,520
Speaker 1: senator who's running for reelection this year. So I think

56
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,000
Speaker 1: senators are already a little worried about the repercussions they

57
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:36,520
Speaker 1: would face if they tried to push this bill into law.

58
00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:40,120
Speaker 1: But this sort of really drives that threat home. And

59
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:42,320
Speaker 1: I have yet to see one of these ads, but

60
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,000
Speaker 1: to me, they kind of sound like the super sad

61
00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:48,760
Speaker 1: ads you would see for the ASPCA that feature Sarah

62
00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:51,480
Speaker 1: McLaughlin singing about how the puppies are now in the

63
00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 1: arms of an angel or something, Except these ads show

64
00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:58,040
Speaker 1: supposed TikTok users talking about how the world would really

65
00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:00,640
Speaker 1: suck if there weren't a TikTok. Also, I'm a little

66
00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:05,640
Speaker 1: extra snarky today, speaking of politics, the Biden administration announced

67
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:08,520
Speaker 1: some new policies regarding AI and its use by the

68
00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:12,280
Speaker 1: federal government. Those policies are that federal agencies are now

69
00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:14,920
Speaker 1: tasked with ensuring that their use of AI does not

70
00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:18,080
Speaker 1: put the rights and safety of American citizens at risk,

71
00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:22,200
Speaker 1: which sounds totally reasonable, but it also sounds like it's

72
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:25,520
Speaker 1: ding dang hard to put into practical use, because we've

73
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,080
Speaker 1: already talked about how there are challenges of just gauging

74
00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:32,800
Speaker 1: risk and danger with AI before you actually deploy it.

75
00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:36,479
Speaker 1: Sometimes you only find out after it's too late. Anyway,

76
00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:39,920
Speaker 1: the second of the three policies announced is that any

77
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:44,040
Speaker 1: agency that is using AI has to disclose that use

78
00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:47,839
Speaker 1: as well as to publish a risk assessment report in

79
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:51,479
Speaker 1: order to maintain transparency, which also seems reasonable to me,

80
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:54,440
Speaker 1: though I do suspect some agencies will maybe be a

81
00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:58,400
Speaker 1: little less transparent than others based off history cough cough.

82
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,919
Speaker 1: The FBI, and finally, each federal agency must create the

83
00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:07,280
Speaker 1: position of chief AI Officer. And further, the person in

84
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:10,160
Speaker 1: that position has to be knowledgeable in the field. So

85
00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:13,320
Speaker 1: no hiring your cousin Bobby so that he has a

86
00:05:13,320 --> 00:05:17,080
Speaker 1: cushy government job unless you know Bobby is also an

87
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:19,760
Speaker 1: authority in the field of AI. Now I'm having a

88
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:21,800
Speaker 1: bit of fun with all this, but I do think

89
00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:24,080
Speaker 1: it is a decent start. It's just going to be

90
00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:26,360
Speaker 1: a really long road ahead of us, and it's hard

91
00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:29,160
Speaker 1: to predict if these measures are going to be adequate

92
00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:33,080
Speaker 1: to mitigate future harm caused by AI. In fact, let's

93
00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:36,800
Speaker 1: actually talk about how AI can cause harm. There's a

94
00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:39,920
Speaker 1: piece by Colin Letcher or Leecher. I'm not sure how

95
00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:42,359
Speaker 1: to say your last name. I apologize. It's in the

96
00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:46,120
Speaker 1: markup and it really raised my eyebrows. So late last

97
00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:49,640
Speaker 1: year the Mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, announced

98
00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:53,200
Speaker 1: that an AI powered chatbot tool would help New York

99
00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:56,440
Speaker 1: businesses operate in a way that worked within New York law.

100
00:05:56,560 --> 00:05:59,840
Speaker 1: So if a business owner had a question, they could

101
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:03,839
Speaker 1: ask this chatbot instead of a real human being, and

102
00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:07,280
Speaker 1: the chatbot would in theory give an answer that was

103
00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:11,040
Speaker 1: in alignment with New York law, and the business person

104
00:06:11,120 --> 00:06:14,960
Speaker 1: could act on that. But Colin says that opposite is

105
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:18,200
Speaker 1: actually true, that the chatbot has in fact made suggestions

106
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:22,400
Speaker 1: that outright violate certain New York City laws, which seems

107
00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:24,520
Speaker 1: to be a big old whoop sie, and he provides

108
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:29,640
Speaker 1: examples of the chatbot encouraging some shady business practices. So,

109
00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:32,360
Speaker 1: for example, in New York City, there is a law

110
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:36,920
Speaker 1: that states landlords cannot discriminate tenants by source of income.

111
00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:41,279
Speaker 1: In most cases. There are some exceptions for very small

112
00:06:41,279 --> 00:06:44,360
Speaker 1: buildings where the landlord and their family also reside in

113
00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:47,720
Speaker 1: that building, but otherwise they're not allowed to discriminate no

114
00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:52,320
Speaker 1: matter where a renter is getting their rent money, such

115
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:56,120
Speaker 1: as if it's from a government assistance program. So the

116
00:06:56,200 --> 00:07:00,000
Speaker 1: landlord is not legally allowed to deny anyone the opportun

117
00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,120
Speaker 1: unity to rent a home based on that, but the

118
00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:05,839
Speaker 1: chatbot declared that landlords are not required to accept tenants

119
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:09,800
Speaker 1: if they're on rental assistance programs, which does sound like

120
00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:14,000
Speaker 1: that's advice that violates the law. Further, the chatbot said

121
00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,600
Speaker 1: that restaurant owners are entitled to a cut of server tips,

122
00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:20,960
Speaker 1: and that's also not true in New York City. In

123
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,800
Speaker 1: some cases, bosses can use tips to count toward minimum

124
00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:28,160
Speaker 1: wage requirements, which I would argue is sort of like

125
00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:32,400
Speaker 1: taking tips away from servers, but they can't actually dip

126
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:35,559
Speaker 1: into the tips themselves and take a cut. He also

127
00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:40,440
Speaker 1: includes several other examples in other scenarios, and he says

128
00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:44,320
Speaker 1: that in some tests the Markup did in their offices,

129
00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:48,520
Speaker 1: the bot would actually provide correct answers occasionally, so maybe

130
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:52,560
Speaker 1: it depends upon how you word the question, although that's

131
00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:56,000
Speaker 1: not entirely clear. The fact that the bot often provided

132
00:07:56,080 --> 00:08:00,840
Speaker 1: a misleading or outright incorrect response is beyond troubling, particularly

133
00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,600
Speaker 1: when city government has proclaimed that the bot is a

134
00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:07,520
Speaker 1: way for business owners to navigate government issues. City officials

135
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,240
Speaker 1: have said the bot is merely in a pilot program phase,

136
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:12,520
Speaker 1: and the whole idea is that it's going to improve

137
00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,520
Speaker 1: over time, which I sure hopes so, because right now

138
00:08:15,560 --> 00:08:17,760
Speaker 1: it sounds like it's doing the opposite of what it

139
00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,320
Speaker 1: is intended to do, which you know, it's kind of

140
00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,160
Speaker 1: hard to get around that, and it all just depends

141
00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:26,440
Speaker 1: upon how you work'd your question. Apparently New York Cities

142
00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:29,680
Speaker 1: mayor ain't stopping there with AI. However, he announced that

143
00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:32,320
Speaker 1: the city is also going to deploy a system made

144
00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:36,400
Speaker 1: by a company called Evolved Technologies, and it's an AI

145
00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:41,160
Speaker 1: powered weapons detection system that's made by a company that

146
00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:45,199
Speaker 1: has been tied with issues relating to weapons detection, namely

147
00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:50,080
Speaker 1: problems like false positives or failure to detect. So just

148
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,079
Speaker 1: imagine that you're trying to commute to work, but then

149
00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:55,680
Speaker 1: you get stopped by New York Police because an AI

150
00:08:55,679 --> 00:08:59,960
Speaker 1: protocol running on what is essentially a surveillance system mistaken

151
00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:04,160
Speaker 1: believes you're packing. So this particular system is similar to

152
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:07,120
Speaker 1: a metal detector. It's something that commuters will have to

153
00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:09,679
Speaker 1: pass through before they can get on the subway, and

154
00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:14,920
Speaker 1: it uses quote ultra low frequency electromagnetic fields end quote

155
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:17,920
Speaker 1: to detect weapons. The New York City Police Department will

156
00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:19,840
Speaker 1: be in charge of the program, and according to New

157
00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:22,920
Speaker 1: York law, they will have to publish a report about

158
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,400
Speaker 1: the system's effectiveness and impact and sort of like a

159
00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:30,040
Speaker 1: risk assessment sort of thing once it's been in place

160
00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:33,439
Speaker 1: for a while. Okay, we're going to take a quick

161
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:35,440
Speaker 1: break and when we come back, I've got a few

162
00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:48,120
Speaker 1: more news stories to get through. We're back, So moving

163
00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:53,040
Speaker 1: on away from AI in politics. Last week, Reddit finally

164
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:56,880
Speaker 1: held its initial public offering or IPO, which means it

165
00:09:56,920 --> 00:10:00,480
Speaker 1: has now become a publicly traded company on the stock market.

166
00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:03,440
Speaker 1: And this week the company saw the stock price drop

167
00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:06,840
Speaker 1: like a rock after it had surged early on. So

168
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:11,320
Speaker 1: like initially, Reddit stocks were doing great when it launched.

169
00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:14,560
Speaker 1: The stocks price was intended to be forty six dollars

170
00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:18,440
Speaker 1: upon the stock market opening. It actually opened above that

171
00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:22,440
Speaker 1: value at nearly forty nine dollars per share, and it

172
00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:24,800
Speaker 1: closed at the end of the day at fifty one

173
00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:27,080
Speaker 1: dollars per share, So at the end of first day

174
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:31,559
Speaker 1: of trading, it was already up significantly from where you

175
00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:35,600
Speaker 1: was intended to launch at. On March twenty sixth, it

176
00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:38,800
Speaker 1: hit its high of nearly seventy five dollars per share,

177
00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:41,880
Speaker 1: but then things took a bit of a turn so

178
00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:45,920
Speaker 1: why did that happen. Well, a couple of disclosures really

179
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:49,400
Speaker 1: seemed to do a number on Reddit stock prices. One

180
00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:53,240
Speaker 1: was that some risk management companies reported that the stock

181
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:57,320
Speaker 1: was being overinflated beyond its actual value, essentially saying this

182
00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:00,440
Speaker 1: stock does not reflect what Reddit's actual value you is.

183
00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:03,200
Speaker 1: Keep in mind, Reddit, like a lot of tech companies

184
00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:06,840
Speaker 1: out there, hasn't posted a profit. It is a revenue

185
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:10,840
Speaker 1: losing business. But that doesn't always matter on the stock market.

186
00:11:10,960 --> 00:11:13,800
Speaker 1: In fact, you could say that often it seems to

187
00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:18,040
Speaker 1: have no impact on the stock market whatsoever. But another

188
00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:21,840
Speaker 1: really big set of disclosures that I think hit that

189
00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:25,600
Speaker 1: stock price hard is that a corporate filing revealed that

190
00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:30,280
Speaker 1: Reddit CEO Steve Huffman sold half a million shares when

191
00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:33,400
Speaker 1: it went public, So he cashed in big time, like

192
00:11:34,040 --> 00:11:36,800
Speaker 1: five hundred thousand shares. And I should really do a

193
00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:40,000
Speaker 1: full episode on Steve Huffman because he has an absolutely

194
00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:44,520
Speaker 1: terrible reputation among Reddit users for various reasons, and there

195
00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:47,520
Speaker 1: is a lot to go into. But more than that,

196
00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:52,520
Speaker 1: Reddit's COOO, Jennifer Wong, also disclosed selling more than five

197
00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:56,360
Speaker 1: hundred thousand of her shares in the company. And when

198
00:11:56,400 --> 00:12:00,000
Speaker 1: your corporate leaders are offloading stock, they'll keep in mind

199
00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:04,240
Speaker 1: both Huffman and Wong still own a butt load of shares. Well.

200
00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,920
Speaker 1: If the leaders are starting to sell off large numbers

201
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:11,439
Speaker 1: of shares, that can really shake investor confidence. I mean

202
00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:13,880
Speaker 1: it seems to send the message of hey, if the

203
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:19,280
Speaker 1: people in charge are offloading their stake in the company,

204
00:12:19,800 --> 00:12:24,679
Speaker 1: why am I staying in. So shares dropped down to

205
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:27,920
Speaker 1: forty nine dollars thirty two cents per share by the

206
00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:31,959
Speaker 1: end of yesterday, which was below the closing price that

207
00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:36,080
Speaker 1: they traded at on opening day. Now, today is good Friday,

208
00:12:36,360 --> 00:12:39,160
Speaker 1: so the stock market is not open today and we'll

209
00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:41,839
Speaker 1: have to see next week where things go from there.

210
00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:45,920
Speaker 1: But over on Reddit there are a lot of armchair

211
00:12:46,520 --> 00:12:50,080
Speaker 1: stock analysts who are essentially saying told you so, or

212
00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:54,520
Speaker 1: they're saying this is just desserts. Mashables Matt Binder reports

213
00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:57,880
Speaker 1: on a study that was conducted by censor Tower, and

214
00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:02,040
Speaker 1: this study claims that x formerly known as Twitter, has

215
00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:06,720
Speaker 1: seen a sharp decline in daily mobile app user numbers

216
00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:10,839
Speaker 1: since Elon Musk took control back in November twenty twenty two.

217
00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:13,720
Speaker 1: And by sharp decline, I mean a twenty three percent

218
00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:17,880
Speaker 1: drop in app usage, so nearly a quarter of all

219
00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:21,320
Speaker 1: users have dropped off if you were looking at it

220
00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:25,120
Speaker 1: from that perspective, and that mobile app usage in general

221
00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:28,240
Speaker 1: is down eighteen percent year over year here in the

222
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:32,520
Speaker 1: United States. So in this regard, X slash Twitter is

223
00:13:32,559 --> 00:13:35,880
Speaker 1: really leading the way among social platforms, because no other

224
00:13:35,960 --> 00:13:39,280
Speaker 1: social platform has seen that large of a decline over

225
00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:42,760
Speaker 1: that same amount of time. X has posted a rebuttal

226
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,679
Speaker 1: to this report saying that sensor Tower doesn't have access

227
00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:50,120
Speaker 1: to all of X's data and thus the conclusions are wrong.

228
00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:54,360
Speaker 1: The reports I've seen have said that since Tower does

229
00:13:54,559 --> 00:13:59,760
Speaker 1: have access to the data about mobile apps but not website,

230
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:03,000
Speaker 1: if you were to go through your browser on your

231
00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:05,880
Speaker 1: phone and go to X that way, they don't have

232
00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:08,319
Speaker 1: access to that information, but they do have access to

233
00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:11,920
Speaker 1: the information of people who are using the actual app

234
00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:17,000
Speaker 1: to access the service. And meanwhile, X is also not

235
00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:20,240
Speaker 1: providing any evidence to back up their own statement that

236
00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:23,400
Speaker 1: this is all off. So it's kind of a he said,

237
00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:26,920
Speaker 1: she said situation. At the moment, there's certainly been the

238
00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:31,160
Speaker 1: perception that usage on X has dropped, at least among

239
00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:36,960
Speaker 1: traditional users, and that the service has largely devolved into

240
00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,720
Speaker 1: a hive of scum and villainy. That may be my

241
00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:43,040
Speaker 1: own personal bias coming through. Actually, let's not say that.

242
00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:45,600
Speaker 1: Maybe that's my own personal bias coming through, and I

243
00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:49,040
Speaker 1: fully admit that, And honestly I can only anecdotally talk

244
00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:53,320
Speaker 1: about this because I got off Twitter last year. Anyway,

245
00:14:53,760 --> 00:14:56,240
Speaker 1: there's no denying the access encounter more than a few

246
00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:59,720
Speaker 1: roadbumps since Musk took over the company. Obviously, the excess

247
00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:04,760
Speaker 1: can continued to struggle with landing advertisers and partners in

248
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:09,280
Speaker 1: the wake of some of the more controversial decisions. Aw

249
00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:13,720
Speaker 1: Olheiser has an article on vox dot com titled the

250
00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:16,920
Speaker 1: slow Death of Twitter is measured in disasters like the

251
00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:21,200
Speaker 1: Baltimore Bridge collapse, and it seems to provide some anecdotal

252
00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:25,600
Speaker 1: support for censer Tower's findings. So Olheiser argues that in

253
00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:29,200
Speaker 1: the good old days, breaking news would proliferate across Twitter

254
00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:32,200
Speaker 1: in real time, so folks would learn about world events

255
00:15:32,320 --> 00:15:36,320
Speaker 1: shortly after they happened, and news would spread incredibly far

256
00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,400
Speaker 1: and wide in just a matter of hours, if not minutes.

257
00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:45,280
Speaker 1: But Olheiser says something different happened when the cargo ship

258
00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:49,760
Speaker 1: hit the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, causing

259
00:15:49,800 --> 00:15:54,240
Speaker 1: that bridge to collapse. So rather than lots of messages

260
00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:58,640
Speaker 1: posted to X linking to articles about the disaster, Olheiser

261
00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:03,080
Speaker 1: says that X was bombarded with conspiracy theorists and folks

262
00:16:03,080 --> 00:16:06,920
Speaker 1: trying to capitalize on the tragedy through engagement baiting. And yeah,

263
00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:09,600
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff also happened in the good old

264
00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:13,320
Speaker 1: days of Twitter as well, Like that's not like unheard

265
00:16:13,320 --> 00:16:16,000
Speaker 1: of back then, But back then, all of that was

266
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:20,120
Speaker 1: kind of a layer that was beneath the legitimate reporting

267
00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:24,360
Speaker 1: on world news that was proliferating across the platform. Now,

268
00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:28,800
Speaker 1: Olheiser says, this underlying layer has sort of been promoted

269
00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:33,320
Speaker 1: above everything else. It's dominating conversation, and beyond that things

270
00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:38,000
Speaker 1: got really ugly. Olheiser ends up quoting several Twitter accounts

271
00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:42,120
Speaker 1: that pushed outright racist narratives in relation to the disaster.

272
00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:45,800
Speaker 1: I do recommend reading the whole piece on box. It

273
00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:51,000
Speaker 1: is pretty compelling. Again, the title of the pieces, the

274
00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:54,160
Speaker 1: slow Death of Twitter is measured in disasters like the

275
00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:58,560
Speaker 1: Baltimore bridge collapse. Turning to video games, the publisher Take

276
00:16:58,640 --> 00:17:01,760
Speaker 1: two Interactive, which c really it's a holding company. It

277
00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:05,200
Speaker 1: owns a couple of other publishers and developers. They own

278
00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:08,600
Speaker 1: rock Star that's the company behind the Grand Theft auto franchise.

279
00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,600
Speaker 1: They also own two K, which is a publisher that

280
00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:16,960
Speaker 1: publishes a ton of different games, including like WWE games

281
00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:19,080
Speaker 1: that speak to my heart, although I haven't played one

282
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,680
Speaker 1: in a few years anyway. They've acquired another video game company,

283
00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:25,800
Speaker 1: a historic one, a storied one. That is, they have

284
00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:31,760
Speaker 1: acquired Gearbox from Embracer Group. So Gearbox is the developer

285
00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:35,479
Speaker 1: behind the Borderlands series of video games, among other things.

286
00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,200
Speaker 1: Borderlands is going to have its own live action film

287
00:17:38,240 --> 00:17:40,679
Speaker 1: coming out in theaters later this year, so this timing

288
00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,560
Speaker 1: is kind of interesting. The deal was for four hundred

289
00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:48,720
Speaker 1: and sixty million smackaroos, which is a princely sum. It's

290
00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:52,320
Speaker 1: not a done deal yet, right, These acquisitions always have

291
00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:55,560
Speaker 1: to go through a process. The deal is set to

292
00:17:55,680 --> 00:18:01,240
Speaker 1: close in June, assuming that regulators don't object to the transaction.

293
00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:05,639
Speaker 1: Since Embracer Group is kind of like the Kirby of

294
00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:09,040
Speaker 1: video game companies out there, meaning it gobbles up pretty

295
00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:12,480
Speaker 1: much every company it sets its sights on, I think

296
00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:16,919
Speaker 1: regulators might be inclined to see a property, leave embracer

297
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:22,199
Speaker 1: groups you know embrace and finally to cover a weird

298
00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:26,359
Speaker 1: story about butts and bosoms. Butts and bosoms sounds like

299
00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,680
Speaker 1: a raunchy role playing game when I say it that way,

300
00:18:28,720 --> 00:18:31,159
Speaker 1: but you know games are involved in this story. I

301
00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:34,760
Speaker 1: am talking about Twitch, the streaming service that started off

302
00:18:34,800 --> 00:18:37,760
Speaker 1: as a way for gamers to stream themselves playing games

303
00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:40,680
Speaker 1: live on the Internet to their adoring fans, and these

304
00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:43,000
Speaker 1: days Twitch does a lot more than that, but games

305
00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:45,880
Speaker 1: are still at the core of the servants, and recently

306
00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:48,760
Speaker 1: the company had to create a few new policies to

307
00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:53,400
Speaker 1: fight back over some innovations in the streaming space, namely

308
00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:57,680
Speaker 1: that certain Twitch streamers are wearing green or blue clothing

309
00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:03,120
Speaker 1: so that they can reject their gameplay on their bodies,

310
00:19:03,359 --> 00:19:08,119
Speaker 1: typically their butts or their chest. This was the case

311
00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:11,040
Speaker 1: with Twitch streamer morg Pi, who also came up with

312
00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:14,560
Speaker 1: a very clever work around where she created a green

313
00:19:15,359 --> 00:19:19,280
Speaker 1: shirt that had the chest region cut out of it,

314
00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:23,840
Speaker 1: so that when she keyed out the color, only her

315
00:19:23,920 --> 00:19:28,400
Speaker 1: head and chest showed up on screen as the player

316
00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:32,879
Speaker 1: view and everything else was showing the gameplay of the

317
00:19:32,880 --> 00:19:35,840
Speaker 1: game she was actually playing on stream, So Twitch is

318
00:19:35,920 --> 00:19:38,080
Speaker 1: now saying that this is against their policy and that

319
00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:42,080
Speaker 1: quote content that focuses on intimate body parts for a

320
00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:45,919
Speaker 1: prolonged period of time will not be allowed. Quote. Twitch

321
00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:49,000
Speaker 1: has had a very long history of trying to balance

322
00:19:49,040 --> 00:19:53,280
Speaker 1: out what is popular among users and streamers on the

323
00:19:53,320 --> 00:19:57,560
Speaker 1: service with what is popular among advertisers, and to that end,

324
00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:01,600
Speaker 1: the company has made several moves, sometimes humorous consequences, to

325
00:20:01,680 --> 00:20:05,160
Speaker 1: tamp down on the more salacious streamers who are out there.

326
00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:08,600
Speaker 1: What a world. All right, that's it for this week.

327
00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:11,440
Speaker 1: I hope all of you are well, and I'll talk

328
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:21,920
Speaker 1: to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

329
00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:27,240
Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

330
00:20:27,359 --> 00:20:29,320
Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.