WEBVTT - At The Money:  Is SpaceX IPO Breaking Capitalism?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, and the Times.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Gave change, and so Gat walks them as.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Once upon a time, companies went public to raise money.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>You'd go on a roadshow to pitch your story and

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>drum up interest. You'd float a big pile of stock,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>and then you're off to the races to go build

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 3>your company. Turns out that's not really the case anymore.

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm Barry Retolts, and on today's episode of At the Money,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about the upcoming I p o

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>s for trillion dollar companies like SpaceX, Anthropic, and open Ai.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>To help us unpack all of this and what it

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 3>means for your portfolio, let's bring in Dave Nadig. He

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 3>is president and director of research at ETF dot com,

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and he shares with us how investors should be navigating

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 3>not only these IPOs, but what they're going to mean

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>for various indexes like the Nasdaq one hundred and the

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred. So, Dave, you wrote a

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>fascinating piece and essentially you claimed SpaceX is breaking capitalism

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 3>and indexing. What is exactly broken? Is it the IPO process,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the index process, or both.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>I gotta say, I think it's both. Sadly, I think

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 4>it's both. The IPO process, I think most people can

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 4>understand steam's pretty broken.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 4>We now live in a world where the private equity

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 4>space is where most of the growth in capitalism is captured.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 4>If I had a great idea, if Berry, if you

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 4>and I were going to just launch a company tomorrow,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 4>go raise a bunch of money and do something, we

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't go to Wall Street. We would go to some

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>private equity firm and we would say, hey, we've got

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 4>this great idea, and they would say, awesome, give us

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>seventy five percent of your company for a couple million bucks,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 4>and we'd be off to the races. And then when

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 4>we need more money, we would go back to that

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 4>same private equity person, who would probably connect us to

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 4>their favorite private credit person who would then loan us

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 4>another fifty million dollars for us to do the next

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>stage of our business, and so on until we had

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>accumulated so many shareholders, so many mouths to feed that

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>if eventually we have to go public so that all

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 4>those people can get paid. That is the reality of

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the modern IPO market, which works out pretty well for

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 4>the private equity capital, but no longer really rewards the.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Public as a public market the way it used to.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about that contrast between old IPOs that

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>raised growth capital. You very much imply in your piece

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is breaking capitalism and indexing, which, by the way,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I stole that opening paragraph of you very much imply

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>that modern IPOs essentially exist to provide insiders and early

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>investors with liquidity. So first, when did this shift occur?

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 3>And second is it an issue? Is it a structural problem?

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>I think we can trace this back to pretty much

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 4>every IPO since the Great Financial Crisis. I mean, I

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>think any IPO in the last fifteen or twenty years

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 4>has followed a pretty similar pattern. We've seen the steady

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 4>growth of the size of IPOs. They're bigger and bigger

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 4>and bigger companies. Now we're talking about trillion dollar IPOs.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 4>So when I went in the dotcom era, the average

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>IPO was about one hundred and twenty million dollars. That

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 4>was the value of the company post IPO, and the

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>amount being floated averaged around thirty or forty percent. So

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 4>big chunks of these companies went public, people could assess them,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 4>they traded for a significant period of time, sometimes profitable,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 4>sometimes not profitable, and then they would end up in

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 4>the hands of the public in an indexes and that

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 4>was a that was a lengthy process. It took, you know,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 4>a year or two of being a public company for

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 4>people to get familiar with you.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's all.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 4>That's all gone now and so now what we have

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 4>are these sort of headline making IPOs of big companies,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>whether they're you know, a Karna or a Reddit or

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>now a SpaceX. And so everybody now feels like these

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>are lottery tickets that you want to get in super

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>early on the ipo, get some purported pop, which no

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 4>longer really happens, and that that is your key to riches. Increasingly,

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>what actually happens is the op deposite. Companies come public,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>they trade down initially, sometimes they ramp up. Tesla famously

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 4>had a great first year after the initial selloff. So

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not that all IPOs go this way, but it

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 4>is no.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Longer like the dot com era.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned SpaceX. People have described this company as

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of unique, in part because it involves commercializing space,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in part because Elon Musk still despite the past couple

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 3>of years, has a cult following courtesy of his work

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 3>at Tesla, and then also because it's just an immense valuation.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>What makes SpaceX unique.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Or is it not unique?

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't want this to be about whether SpaceX

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 4>good or SpaceX bad. SpaceX is unique for a bunch

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 4>of structural reasons. It is already a multi business conglomerate.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty rare we see a multi business conglomerate come

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 4>out as an IPO that tends to be what you

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 4>do after UIPO and start accumulating new companies. So inside

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 4>the SpaceX wrapper, we've got Twitter X, We've got Grock

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 4>and Xai, which is increasingly now a data center story,

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 4>I guess unless a development of AI story. We've got

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the providing commercial internet right nine million startlink subscribers. That's

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a very real business that makes real money. And then

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the near monop monopoly on at least United States Space

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Launch is virtually completely monopoly now for SpaceX. So whether

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 4>that's a great business or not, that makes it a

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>bit unique already out of the gate. But more unique

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 4>is how it's coming to market. It's only floating five

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 4>percent of its stock, so ninety five percent of this

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 4>company will still be privately held after they float the IPO.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 4>And yet despite that very very thin float, it's getting

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 4>accelerated entry into the NASTAQ one hundred and is being

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 4>considered for accelerated entry into the S and P five hundred.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 4>So we're breaking all sorts of rules.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about the Nasdaq one hundred. If you've

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>been an investor in the queues as they're known, uh,

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq one hundred index ETF, you have done tremendously

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>well over the past fifteen years outperform the S and

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>P outperformed just about every historical period, including the nineties,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>where the cues were just you know, a giant home

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>run except for that little, you know, eighty three percent

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>crash at the end. So, so, what what did Nasdaq

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>do wrong in admitting SpaceX to the cues and what

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>should they have done instead?

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, so what they did was over the spring they

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 4>did what's called the consultation, which is they go to

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 4>all the people who actually pay for the index. I mean,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 4>it's important to point out Nasdaq's in a business. They

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 4>licensed the Nasdaq one hundred two folks like the investco

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 4>to run the cues products that people know and so

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>they went out to all the people who licensed that

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>index and said, would you be okay if we did

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>this thing? And everybody said yes, and so now we

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 4>have new rules. What the new rules did was accelerate

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 4>how quickly a company can get in if they're very large,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 4>to fifteen days. It used to be six months. And

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>they've also changed how they think about the float. It

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 4>used to be if you really floated a very thin

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 4>amount of stock, they just wouldn't consider you at all. Now,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 4>at five percent float, they're going to pretend that your

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 4>float is fifteen percent or three x, just because reasons.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 4>And then over time, as the float increases, as shares

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 4>come off lock up and more shares trade, that will

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 4>ramp until thirty three percent of the fund the company

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>has floated, at which point it receives full weight in

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 4>the index. Because the Nasdaq one hundred, unlike most other indexes,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>is not free float adjusted. So normally, if they didn't

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 4>do anything and they let SpaceX in, it would come

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>in at one point seventy five trillion. Instead, it's going

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 4>to come up at fifteen percent of that when it

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 4>finally launches, and then that will increase with every unlock

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 4>The percentage that the funds need will go up, and

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>so it creates this kind of ramp that as more

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 4>shares come out, there's more guaranteed buying, which I gotta

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 4>say feels like bad liquidity for the insiders.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, what motivates them to do this?

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what harm would befall the index or the

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 3>IPO or NASDAK generally if they waited the six months

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that they're supposed to wait for every other IPO.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, basically none.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 4>The only argument you can make is that by having

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX in the ETFs in the index itself, that people

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>will be more attracted to that index, and therefore people

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 4>will put more money in those funds, and ultimately that's

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 4>what people really care about. They want money tracking those funds.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 4>From a performance perspective, it's not like every human being

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 4>on the planet won't be able to buy these shares

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 4>the day after at IPOs. They'll be If you want

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>to go buy one hundred shares the day after the.

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>IPO, therebore the day of the IPO. You don't even

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>have to wait till the KAY.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 4>There'll be a price. Anybody will be able to buy it.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>So it's not like it is this rarefied thing that

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>can only be bought through this index. It's going to

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 4>be everywhere. It's going to be like applestock, It'll be

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>easily tradable all over the world. So all this is

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 4>doing is guaranteeing the existing money that is tracking that

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 4>index will have to sell a whole bunch of other

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 4>things in order to buy this new slug of SpaceX,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 4>which will be something like seven ish billion dollars on

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 4>that one day that they have to buy it all.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>So they're just going to be a big whale buyer

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 4>in the market on one day. Guess which way the

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 4>price will go? Honestly, who knows? Because who everybody knows this,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 4>So it's gonna get front run. So do you buy

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>it the day before this? Do you wait until after this?

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be one of those get the popcorn

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 4>moments and markets?

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Is this an attempt to get ownership of SpaceX in

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 3>an index before the S and.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>P five hundred.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Sure, it's a chance to build a pool of assets

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 4>with a reasonable weight before the rest of the index

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 4>world is piled on. Although we should point out SMP

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 4>is now considering accelerating their rules too, to include a

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>company like SpaceX after six months not nearly as egregious,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 4>And the SMP has a committee that could say no,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>and they always free float weight everything, so even if

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 4>they did let it in early, it's only going to

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 4>be in at five percent of its nominal real value.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 4>So what could happen in the SMP is much less dramatic, thankfully,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 4>than what could happen in the queues.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>So really this raises the question is this just a

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>one off, one time technical distortion or is this going

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>to be a recurring tax on index ownership for people

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>who don't want to play the ipo game, don't want

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to play the stock picking game.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, historically, I should point out the academic research would

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>suggest that getting IPOs into your index earlier is bad

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>for the in the investor who's standing there before the transaction.

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So oddly, Vanguard's CRISP indexes from the Chicago Research Center

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 4>for Pricing, those indexes have some of them are accelerated

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>to five day intra induction after the IPO, and there's

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 4>been a study around that and it says that's kind

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 4>of a bad idea. You're very likely to be buying

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 4>the pop and then sort of sitting on a long,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 4>slow decline back to what becomes some market value market

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>fair value, but the index tends to be the top tick.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very easy to create.

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 4>A scenario where you could see something like that in

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 4>the cues as these IPOs get added. But again, given

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 4>that everybody knows precisely when the trade's going to happen,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>which is market on clothes, fifteen days after the IPO,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 4>you're probably going to see the ramp up well before

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 4>that because everybody's going to try to be the one

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 4>selling into that index buying.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>So how do you solve this problem. Is it simply

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 3>a matter of adjusting this for the full float. Hey,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>you're only going to put five percent out right, that'll

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>be reflected in in the waiting or do you just

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>follow your existing rules in terms of how soon we

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>add an IPO to the index after it goes public,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>so SpaceX has to wait the usual six months.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, the question is the should here is

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for who? Right?

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 4>As an as an investor, as a lowly end investor.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 4>What this is doing is creating more differentiation between indexes

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 4>than we have previously seen. Right, So we're going to

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 4>look at the world as it is now, well, now

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 4>the cues. The NASDAQ one hundred is for sure the

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 4>hyper ipo get everything in fast, get everything in big.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 4>As long as it's listed on NASDAK and it's not

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 4>a financial company, you're going to get it in the cues,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 4>and so that's going to be the go go go

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 4>S and p is Somewhere in the middle, they're they're

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 4>sort of trying to acknowledge this reality of the broken

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 4>IPO market and maybe do things a little sooner. I

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 4>would say most investors can probably ignore most of that

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>because they're adults in the room. And then institutions, I

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 4>should point out, aren't playing with any of the stuff.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 4>They all use MSCI indexes, right, and those have very

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 4>static rule books that are very carefully adjudicated, and nobody's

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 4>even talking about MSCI changing their rules about this stuff.

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 4>So what this means is we're going to have much

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 4>more differentiation between what passive means, and as an investor,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 4>that means you can no longer just say I'm index,

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm fine, You're gonna have to have an opinion.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Huh. Really really fascinating. I'm deeply concerned about the everybody

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 3>knows massive buying cloth on clothes for SpaceX. What does

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>this mean for price discovery? What does this mean in

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 3>terms of distorting the true demand and supply relationship.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's hugely distortive.

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 4>And the problem is that normally what you could say

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 4>is something like, all right, we'll let this transaction get

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 4>out of the way, and then things will calm down,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and then everything will be and then we'll find out

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 4>what prices really are like when natural buyers and sellers

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 4>actually show up in the market and have to think

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 4>about it. The problem is that implies there's some future

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 4>time when we can say things are now normalized. I

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>would usually have said something like, ah, three to six months,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 4>things will settle down, because in markets three months is

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 4>a long time, But I should point out six months

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 4>after this IPO, we get two things happening at the

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>same time. Traditionally, when a lot of stock unlocks, right,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and eighty days is a very common unlock window.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 4>And second, Nazac's gonna have to rebalance the index again,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 4>and if those things time perfectly, we're gonna end up

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 4>with a bunch of shares unlocking, meaning the flight float

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>might go from say five to fifteen percent. At the

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 4>same time, NASAK will have to take theirre from fifteen

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 4>percent to save forty five percent because they're gonna be

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>three x whatever the float is on that read balance.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna have the exact same problem all over

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>again as shares unlock and the index rebalances.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I assume the three x was just for the thin

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>IPO float. If that goes to fifteen percent or twenty

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 3>five percent, it's three x again.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>That's until it until it.

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Hits a third, at which point obviously you're at one

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent r right. So but that's that's the way

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 4>it happens linearly. But as float unlocks, three times that

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>amount gets added to the index until.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's the motivation for that?

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Because the as TEK one hundred has never been free

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 4>float adjusted. Now, it hasn't usually mattered because nobody really

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 4>cares that Nvidia's ninety five percent float and Apple is

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 4>ninety two percent float, but the index has always just

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 4>included them at.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, It's only it's only a problem when it's very

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 4>very small. So what historically there's been as a floor.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 4>If only ten percent of your shares are floating, you

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 4>don't get to play at all, that's what they're getting

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 4>rid of to replace it.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>With this sort of weird multiplier effect.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>It seems like, you know, we're talking about an index.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It seems like this isn't a passive decision, and it's

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>coming from the folks at Nasdaq are making a very

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 3>active bet. Hey, this Elon guy with Tesla was a

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 3>giant win and SMP was late to the party adding them.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's not make the same mistake with SpaceX. Is that

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 3>the thinking.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's exactly what's going on. It will

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 4>for sure be a marketing tool for the index, certainly

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 4>if SpaceX tears out of the gate, which with all this.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Buying you know is more likely now.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 4>It definitely puts some tailwind behind the price of the

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 4>stock when you have these known buyers, that's going to

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 4>just take some time to roll through. And look, I

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 4>think it makes it a very active index.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It already was.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 4>It has weird selections all through it, like non financials

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 4>only on Nasdaq. It's a bizarre set of rules, and

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 4>now it's got this weird timed trading thing that you

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 4>just mentioned. I think this makes it very tough for

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 4>anybody to think of this as a long term buy

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 4>and hold investment where everything will just work out in

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>the long run.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's now making some very active trading bets.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, So I'm gonna make you the philosopher king

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 3>of index inclusion rules. What does that look like in

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of waiting period, minimum flow, profitability, governance, and just

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 3>do we have different rules from mega IPOs than regular IPOs.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 4>I if I was running the universe, if it was

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Dave Noddig's index company, companies would have to trade for

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 4>a year. They would have to have a year of

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 4>trailing profitability, which is what the S and P currently has.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 4>They're talking about getting rid of that too. I would

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 4>free flow adjust everything without question, all the way down

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 4>to nothing. Like you can float one percent of your

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 4>stock and you get a one percent presence Like, I

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 4>think that's fine, And I would not count non voting shares.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>At all period. Huh.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating fascinating stuff. So for investors interested in the SpaceX ipo,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>there are gonna be a lot of trading anomalies around

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 3>this IPO. It seems like the structure is very much

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>set up by Nasdak and others to goose the price higher.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 3>If you're a holder of cues. Well, maybe this has

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 3>some impact around the edges. Some of it's going to offset,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>some of it could drive prices higher. But regardless, the

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>IPO of SpaceX is going to impact your passive index.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm Barry Riddolts. You're listening to Bloomberg's at the Money,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 3>any ti