WEBVTT - Dee, John Dee: Codename 007?

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of Shonda Land Audio in

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>partnership with I Heart Radio. He was a Cambridge educated

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>polly math and adviser to Queen Elizabeth the First, and

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>he also conversed with the angels. Welcome to Criminalia work

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Today we'll be talking about the celebrated mathematician and alchemist

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>John Dee. I'm Maria tre Marquis and I'm Holly Fry.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>The influence of prophecy and astrology have an important place

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fifteenth and sixteen centuries, so it was no

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise that the ideas were important to King Henry the Seventh,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>who ruled England from August until his death in April

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen o nine. The importance of those things remained

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>strong through the Tutor period, which began the same year

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Henry took the throne and came to an end in

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen o three. Not only was he fascinating by the occult,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that fascination continued through generations of his family. His son,

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Henry the Eighth was obsessed with the practices, as was

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth the First. Henry the eighth daughter enter the man

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>named John D. John d. Is there anything he wasn't interested?

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>In let's start with his personal life. John D was

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>born in July to Rowland and Joanna D who were

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of Welsh descent. Rowland was a tailor and a mercer.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>A mercer was a merchant who dealt with fabrics, usually

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>expensive fabrics. And just in case we have any stitchers

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd and your brain has made the connection

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to the phrase mercer at cotton, which comes up in

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of thread and occasional sewing textiles. Coincidental and unrelated.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That is named for a process of treating fabrics so

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they upticked die more readily, but it is named for

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>John Mercer, who invented it several hundred years after the

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>events were talking about today, which puts us in the

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>mid eighteen hundreds. And we could thank Holly for this

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ditchery and sewing information. I immediately thought of mercerized cotton.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I knew would didn't didn't want any confusion to be there.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So back to John D. John was married at least

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>twice and possibly three times. Here's what we've got. John's

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>first wife was Katherine Constable. The couple had no children.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>There may have been a second wife after Katherine, but

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that is unclear. Again, if there was a marriage, there

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>were no children. John was we know, married to Jane Fromond.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Jane had been a lady in waiting to the Countess

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of Lincoln. It suggested that Jane's connections could have helped

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>her new husband's career and his finances in his later years. Now,

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>also depending on what you read, John and Jane had

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>either one child or they had eight children, pretty wide margin. Uh.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>In the scenario where the couple is described as having

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one child, that child was a son named Arthur, and Arthur,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>like his father, was an alchemist who was also a

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>physician to King Charles the First of England, and is

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>are Michael the First of Russia. The version of the

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>story where they had eight children kind of falls out

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like this. There were four boys and four girls, and

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that at least two of their daughters died

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of plague. Let's switch this focus to John's work. John

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 1>really was a genius. If you look at the word

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Polly Math in the dictionary, you could possibly see a

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>picture of John d He was a person who was

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>genuinely curious about our world and what might be beyond

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>our world. So John, as you'll get to know was

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was really quite a character, But we can't talk about

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>all the things about his life in this episode. He

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was a force of nature, and our show just isn't

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>big enough to contain him. So if there's something about

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>his life that we skip over, we probably didn't want to.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We know about De's education because he told us about it.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>In fifteen ninety two, he recounted how, at age fifteen,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he attended St John's College, Cambridge, where he wrote he

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>studied for at least eighteen hours a day. He received

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>his undergraduate degree in fifteen forty five and a master's

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>degree in fifteen forty eight, both from St John's. In

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen forty six, John was elected a fellow at the

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>newly founded Trinity College. He also spent time studying at

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the University of Luven. Note that here we're talking about

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>old University of Luvin, not the newer Catholic University of Luven,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>which was established in eighteen thirty five, and it is

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>at university where John d met, in his words, some quote,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>learned men. These learned men included mathematicians Gema Frisius, Gerardis Mercator,

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and Gaspar America. By fifteen fifty John was living in

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and lecturing around Paris, and went on to work for

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>King Henry the second of France, as well as the

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>un Diversity of Paris. D's understanding of chemistry and physics

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was extraordinary, and he's said to have used these skills

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to produce some pretty impressive stage effects during his time

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>at Cambridge. Here's one great example of his mathematical antics.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>He was involved in a production of Aristophanes's Athenian play

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Packs or Peace, a comedy that was first staged in

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>four b C. D's contribution was this a giant mechanical

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>scarab beetle used as a prop to make it appears

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>though a character was flying through the air while riding

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the insects back the performance, it was reviewed, was so

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>lifelike and astonishing to the audience that many believed d

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>must have conspired with the devil to make such a thing.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And these thoughts, well we quote him here and for

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>these and such like marvelous arts and feats naturally mathematically

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and mechanically rock contrived, any student and modest Christian philosopher

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be counted and called a conjuror. As a student at

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Trinity College, he gained a reputation as a magician. We're

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a break for a word from our sponsor,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and when we're back we will talk about the crime

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>of calculating. Welcome back to Criminalia. Let's talk about John

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>d astrologer to the royals. It is said that John

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>turned down a mathematical professorship at the University of Paris

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen fifty one and another similar position at the

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>University of Oxford in fifteen fifty four, all in the

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hope that he would be able to score an official

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>position with the Crown. And he did, and then he

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>got arrested. He was arrested and charged with the crime

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of something called calculating. It was in reference to what

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was considered an act of treason on his behalf, casting

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>horoscopes for Queen Mary and her younger sister Elizabeth, who

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>would go on to become Elizabeth the First. He was

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>then interrogated by the Star Chamber, which was an English

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>court that sat in the Palace of Westminster. He was

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>exonerated by the common law judges in that court, but

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he later was examined by Edmund Bonner, Bishop of London

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and infamous heretic hunter the outcome may not have been

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you expect, though D. N. Bonner became friends

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and that marked the end of any further investigation. Later

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>found among these books was one inscribed in Latin quote

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the house of my singular friend, a reference to a

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>stay at Bonner's home. John d did work for the

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>royal family, and he became famously known as the conjuror

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to Queen Elizabeth the First, but d was a just

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>astrologer to the royals. He had clients and students outside

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of the royal family, including Francis Bacon, promoter of a

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>new idea called the scientific method, un to the astronomer

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Diggs, who believed the universe to be infinite. Not

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to be missed two is Dee's library, which is kind

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of a character in and of itself. It was not

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your ordinary home bookshelves, and it was known to have

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>contained as many as three thousand to four thousand books.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It became a hub a sort of scholarly network that

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he often imagined expanding into an international research institute. Occultism

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in these types of practices were actually pretty normal for

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the period, and the occult sciences enjoyed a kind of

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance in later Elizabethan England, as print and translation made ancient, Medieval,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and earlier Renaissance texts available to would be English adepts,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>writes academic Paul S. Sever Dee didn't view any of

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>his study as heresy. He saw the practices as a

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>way to learn more about the world and the cosmos.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>He spent much of his time on the ideas of alchemy, divination,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and hermetic philosophy, and he known for his accuracy in

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what was at the time the newly emerging science of physics,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and for his interest in exploration of chemical compounds. But

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>here is a problem. That d and his peers ran

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>into math made people suspicious. D was up against a

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>society that considered math disreputable. It was thought to be

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in league with the practices of witchcraft and the dark arts.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You're manipulating the counting of things that is scary. Nicolas

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Copernicus is the Revolutionibus, published in fifty three, for instance,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was scandalous because of its heliocentric theory of the solar system.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that he used mathematics to deduce the

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>things he couldn't directly see was also problematic. During the

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Tutor period, math books were often destroyed, usually burned for

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>being and we're quoting conjuring books. A few decades after

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>D's death in sixteen fifty one, biograph for John Rawleigh

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was accused of conjuring when he used basic geometry to

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>calculate the height of a steeple. So alchemy could and

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was confused with witchery from time to time or often,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and at this time, as we've seen, such as with

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Cornelia's Agrippa as well as Nostrodamus, when your work and

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>interests fall into what's considered to be beyond our physical world,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you begin to kind of tell the line between an

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>afternoon discussion about horoscopes in the queen's court to being

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>punished by death for heresy. In six hundred, just a

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>few years before John's death, astronomer Giordano Bruno was executed

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>because well, I mean, actually it depends on which historian

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you ask, because this is debated. The Roman Inquisition condemned him,

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>at least partly because of cosmology. Bruno argued there were

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>many worlds, and he was formally accused by the Church

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not of heresy but of blasphemy thirteen times in ten

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>depositions by six witnesses. These out of world ideas lead

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to his death. Eventually, John d left the Queen's service

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to seek deeper knowledge of the occult and the supernatural.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>In doing so, though, De aligned himself with individuals who

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>were or who were once considered to be con artists

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and Charlatan's and frankly frauds. These gadgets and devices may

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>have seemed magical to the untrained eye, but they were

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actually mathematical instruments. The children near his home in Mortlake

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>quote dreaded him because he was accounted a conjurer. But

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you see, John was a conjurer. D closely studied codes

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and cryptography discussed in Stenographia by the German abbot Johannes Trithemius, who,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was suspected of diabolical wizardry. Steinographia described

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the practice of concealing a message within another message or

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a physical object, basically the art of encrypting messages, and

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the book that turned d on the idea of

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>angelic communication. John spent years scrying for angels and spirits

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>with a man named Edward Kelly, who was an English

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance occultist and self declared spirit medium. Scrying is a

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>form of divination that involves staring into a reflective surface,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>such as a crystal ball or a mirror, or maybe water,

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and looking for visions of things to come in the future.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>John and Edward were seeking and we quote angelic conversation

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>d and Kelly claimed they've discovered an angelic language called

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>an opian and we're being taught the alphabet and words

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>by the angels themselves. So we have to talk about

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this part because the story here takes a pretty big turn.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a version of John and Edward's story where

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Edward claims the angels wanted the men to swap wives.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Depending on the version, this situation may have happened in Poland. Also,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the version, they did swap wives and shortly

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>after parted ways. Some versions do, while others do not

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>claim that. In one of these journals, he writes, Kelly

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>may have fathered one of his sons. You know, regardless

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of which adventure here that you choose, the two men

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>did part ways. We are going to take a break

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>here for a word from our sponsor, and when we're back,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the idea that John D.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Was a spy. Welcome back to Criminalia. So is John

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>D a scientist or is he a sorcerer? Let's discuss.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>John had set his more scientific and mathematical work aside

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for the crystal ball and obsidian mirror. Upon returning home

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to England, def that his home and that enormous and

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>enviable library we mentioned had both been broken into, pillaged

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and vandalized. John did return to the Queen's service when

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth the First appointed him Warden of Manchester College in

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen ninety six, but he found himself out of royal

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>favor when the Queen was succeeded by James the First.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>The end of John's life was overwhelmed by poverty and isolation.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>History has long said that he died at Mortlake in

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>December of sixteen o eight and was buried in the

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Church of St Mary the Virgin, but over the years

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>new evidence has emerged that suggests that maybe his death

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen that way. Perhaps instead his death actually took

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>place the following March in sixteen o nine, and that

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of at Mortlake, rather it happened in the London

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.239
<v Speaker 1>home of his friend probable fellow alchemist and possible executor

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to his estate. John pontois pretty much everyone who has

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tried has founded difficult to categorize John D. Is he

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a scientist or a sorcerer. John was a fairly marginal

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>character for most of the twentieth century, and it wasn't

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteen sixties and seventies that his story began

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to re emerge, this time regarding the advances in astronomy

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy that occurred during his lifetime. A new focus

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was placed on these contributions to subjects including mathematics, geography, astronomy,

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and navigation, and his magical investigations and occult leanings were

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>de emphasized. Many of his contemporaries would have tried to

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>pin him down as a philosopher or an astrologer, or

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even a magician. All would have agreed on one thing, though,

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>John D was perhaps most of all a mathematician. In

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>his work The Mathematical Preface to the Elements of Geometry

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of Euclid and Megara, published in fifteen seventy, D argued

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that mathematics was an influence and an imported influence on

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>all other arts and sciences. This became one of John's

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>most widely and most frequently reprinted writings. And when it

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to those writings and specifically that writing, let's quote Galileo,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>The Book of Nature is written in the language of mathematics.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You probably recognize Galileo as the famous Italian astronomer, physicist,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and engineer. And there's probably a few of the things

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I could add that list as well. The two were contemporaries,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but D would have been nearly forty years old when

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Galileo was born. Galileo's point here was complicated, but it

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>boils down to really this, No true science would be

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>called a science until it had become mathematical. Natural philosophy,

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>which D had interest in studying, was the philosophical study

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of nature and the physical universe. So the idea that

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>John's work was written in the language of mathematics was

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>really big, and German philosopher Emmanuel Kant backed up this

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>idea in the eighteenth century, saying, quote, there is only

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that much genuine science in any science as it contains mathematics.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>To put it all into perspective, though definitions were still

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty fluid at this point, and Kant applying the idea

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that modern science must be mathematicized, denied that chemistry was

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a science, so not all wisdom is universal to all

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>things right, it's a work in progress here, it was

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>agreed though that quote des work looks like mumbo jumbo

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and mysticism. Yet it was mathematical, and that was what mattered.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>During his lifetime, John was never rewarded for his intellectual achievements,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but his legend, his ideas and inventions, they live on

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways in literature, comics, opera, songs, and

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>video games, and even James Bond. James Bond Bond, Yes,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but first Prospero. John D and William Shakespeare were contemporaries,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and while no one can be sure if the two

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>men ever met each other, it's not unlikely that they

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.959
<v Speaker 1>knew of each other. That's all speculative, though, However, scholars

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are almost certain that Shakespeare used John as the model

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for his character of Prospero, an alchemist who uses magical

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>powers to manipulate and intimidate in the play The Tempest.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>The Tempest was probably written in sixteen ten or sixteen eleven,

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so not long after John D's death, and it is

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not just the character of Prospero that he inspired. He

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was considered to have been the inspiration for Christopher Marlowe's

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>character Dr Faustus, as well as Ben Johnson's The Alchemist.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And then there's D. John D. So we discovered a

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>long history regarding John D as a spy, and it

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>all seems to have started when seventeenth century scientist Robert

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hook suggested that D was officially employed by Elizabeth the

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>First not for his abilities as an oracle, but that

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he was really an undercover agent for the crown. Hook

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>argued that John traveled Europe as an academic, but his

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>real job was to gather information for the Queen. Hook

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>also defended John's conversations with the angels by explaining they

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>must have been encrypted intelligence messages sent from the Royal court.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>We have actually no proof of anything that Hook said

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>about D in this capacity. It just seems to be

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, sort of floating in the ether. In rumors

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>swirled that John had signed his name as double O

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>seven in his correspondence with Queen Elizabeth the First, and

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the code was rumored to mean for the Queen's eyes only.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>But again, there's nothing to see here other than rumors.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, actually there is one thing. It has

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>been said that d did actually sign memos to Elizabeth

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>with specific symbols two ohs like a pair of eyes,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>followed by a seven with its top drawn across back

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of the os. It's much more likely, though, to be true,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that d advised the Queen's director of Intelligence, Francis Walsingham,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>on issues of national security as well as on establishing

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a network of spies and codes, because remember, he was

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>competent with crying, with seeing what was to come. Much

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>more of a project manager than a field agent at

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>that point, Yes, very much so. So angel conversationalist or

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>not conjuror or mathematician. During the Scientific Revolution, that's the

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>specific period of scientific growth shortly after D's death, during

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the sixteenth and seventeen centuries, these ideas and visions began

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to be heard and taken seriously by a larger circle

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of scientists. And with a quote from John himself, We're

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna stroll over to the cauldron quote. Who does not

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>understand should either learn or be silent. So Holly, teach

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>us what's in the cauldron. Oh, surprises, surprises. I feel

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like this is one of those drinks that is either

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>going to lose half of the listeners or um or

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>delight them, or maybe it'll be But in any case,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a drink that I call angel language, because

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I was really obsessed with this idea of like, oh, yes,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're we're talking to angels. They're teaching us alphabets and

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>also instructing us to do interesting things, and so I

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just kept thinking about like what a what a strange

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and sort of wonderful thing to be, like, oh, yeah,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to angels. Later, I gotta I gonna have lunch,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but I have a meeting to the angels. I had

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with the angels at five. I'm like, so

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to come up is something that felt a

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>little angelic, and I noodled on it for a bit

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then I realized I wanted to do something with champagne.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And this one has some roots with the classic champagne

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>cocktail from the eighteen fifties, but with a twist that

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of nods to John d The classic champagne cocktail,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>which isn't what we're making here today, but I'll give

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it to you in case. Is a sugar cube that

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is then doused with angst a bitters and you drop

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it in your glass before you pour the champagne, so

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it sweetens it. Some people just use regular sugar, not

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a sugar cube, and now some people would use simple syrup.

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It's delightful. However, this one, I'm telling you it's a

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>little weird. But come with me, something very fun happens.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend using a coupe for this one rather

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>than a fluted champagne glass because, uh, it helps with

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a thing that I will describe. It does the thing

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>for you. You're gonna build this, like I said, in

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the glass, so it's not something you shake and then

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>pour in. You want to go ahead and build it

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in the glass. So it's gonna start with a blourb

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's an official measurement. Um. I've seen it popping up

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in cookbooks recently, like a spoonful of marshmallow cream. Well,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this is starting interestingly, I know, I told you, And

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna toss that in your glass, and then on

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>top of that, you'll pour a half ounce of creme

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>de violette. If you don't like violet cordial, you could

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>use almost any other cordial here that you prefer, and

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>then an ounce of whipped cream or vanilla vodka whatever.

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I had whipped cream vodka on hand, but vanilla vaca

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>would work just fine here. And then you're gonna top

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all that with champagne. And so what happens is your

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>marshmallow fluff um or your marshmallow cream, whichever you've bought,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to start to break apart and dissolve a little,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and it makes these beautiful little cloud shapes in the glass.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And it's got that kind of In my case, the

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>crammed a violette added a little pink hue, so it

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>looks almost like a pretty sunset, and it gets sweeter

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>as you drink it because more and more of the

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>marshmallow fluff has broken down, and it's just very beautiful.

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You could, even if you wanted to play John de

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fun could say that you were reading the fluff clouds

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as they break apart, like one would divine tea leaves

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or something. There's no real thing going on there. It's

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just delicious sugar breaking into pieces. But this is uh

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>drink that tastes like candy and surely packs a wallop.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I described it, as I was work shopping it,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I was tweeting a little about it, and I said

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it was like being slapped around by kittens, so yummy,

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, oh, it's a very dessert e drink.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But because I mean you have vodka and a liquor

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and champagne, the only thing that's not an alcohol in

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there is marshmallow flow, so I have to die you

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I I grew up with marshmallow fluf fluff for Nutters,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>where um, and I have this association with marshmallow fluff

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and peanut butter, so like, I'm so glad that you've

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>broken fluff out for me into a different world because

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I was never really a fan and a fluff for nutter,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but I have a fan and I'm not keeping your drink,

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'd much rather have that. And I do like

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>marshmallow flavored everything, so um yeah, I kind of wanted

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to do something that tasted a little like Angel food cake,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which it does, and it is light because of the champagne,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of like an Angel food cake e

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>nod as well. Here's how you would do the mocktail

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>version of this. Marshmallow cream or marshmallow fluff obviously fine.

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Instead of your cordial, you can just do a flavored syrup,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever variety you like. I wanted to do a rose syrup,

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm trying not to be a predictable beast um.

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But also I mean, if you like a raspberry syrup,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>like any syrup that you like, would be fun to

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>try here. Obviously you can't do the vodka. Here's what

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I would do a little bit of cream soda, and

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>then you're ginger ale on top of that. I would

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>do one or both of those in a low sugar

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or sugar free version. Otherwise it's going to be pretty cloying.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you like super sweet, then go for it.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>The other funding that happens that I didn't mention with

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the alcoholic version is that when you pour the champagne in,

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it really reacts with the marshmallow fluff and does this

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>like kind of explode. E does have a chemical chemical

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>react a little bit. I mean it just it has.

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You have a big moment initially, so definitely pour it slowly,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>don't just like because it's gonna expand pretty quickly and

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you may have an overflow under your counter like I did.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It happens tools of the trade. So it's a fun

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>little dessert sparkler, And like I said, it's called angel Language.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I want to make I would have

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>had too, but I workshop them sometimes in the morning

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>before we record, and I didn't need to come to

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this recording like Stumbalina. I would have been really not

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not holly in the corner right, I've been like, where

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>do you be? John. It wouldn't have been very good

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. So nobody needs that. So if you make

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a little angel language, I hope it's delightful for you.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope that you meet us back here next week

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>where we will have yet another episode of Criminalia, and

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I hope that you have enjoyed this one, and I

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you for spending this time with us.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Criminalia is a production of Shonda land Audio in partnership

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from Shonda land Audio,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>please visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.